Dickson Health And Rehab
901 N Charlotte, Dickson, TN 37055 · For profit - Individual · 70 certified beds · (615) 446-5171 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.3% | 14.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.3% | 6.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.8% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.1% | 13.8% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 35.9% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.4% | 31.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.7% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.2% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.0% | 16.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.7% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.0% | 79.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.6% | 22.6% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 0.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.22 | 1.67 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.78 | 1.56 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 67.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.1%CMS range 42.5–66.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.8%CMS range 5.8–12.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 67.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 67.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 67.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 73.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.1%CMS range 5.0–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 61.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care to ensure that acceptable parameters of nutritional status were maintained and dietary recommendations were reviewed and implemented for 3 of 3 (Resident #2, #6, #7) residents reviewed for weight loss. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring, revealed .Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise.The physician should be informed of a significant change in weight and may order nutritional interventions.The Registered Dietician or Dietary Manager should be consulted to assist with interventions; actions are recorded in the nutrition progress notes. 2. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow Physician's orders for 5 of 7 (Resident #8, #13, #15, #17 and #60) residents and the facility failed to have orders for oxygen administration and tracheostomy care for 2 of 7 (Resident #62 and #70) reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revealed .Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the resident's goals and preferences.Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician.Change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revealed .Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, employee time sheet review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 11 of 31 days reviewed and failed to ensure the facility had an RN that was not the Director of Nursing (DON) when the census was above 60 for 7 of 31 days reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Nursing Services-Registered Nurse (RN), dated 10/2017, revealed .It is the intent of the facility to comply with Registered Nurse staffing requirements.utilize the services of a Registered Nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days a week.The Director of Nursing may serve as a charge nurse only when the facility has average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents. 2. Review of the employee time clock sheets dated 4/25/2026 through 5/24/2026, revealed there was no RN on duty for 8 consecutive hours on the following dates: a. 5/2/2026 b. 5/3/2026 c. 5/7/2026 d. 5/8/2026 e. 5/9/2026 f. 5/10/2026 g. 5/15/2026 h. 5/16/2026 i. 5/17/2026 j. 5/18/2026 k. 5/19/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure employment of a qualified Infection Preventionist to monitor and maintain the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. This had the potential to affected 65 of 65 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Preventionist, dated 2/1/2026, revealed .The facility will employ one or more qualified individuals with responsibility for implementing the facility's infection prevention and control program.whose primary role is to coordinate and be actively accountable for the facilities infection prevention and control program to include the antibiotic stewardship program.The IP [Infection Preventionist] will physically work on site in the facility.The IP must have obtained specialized IPC [Infection Control and Prevention] training beyond initial professional training or education prior to assuming the role and must provide evidence of training through a certification(s) of completion. The facility failed to ensure there was an IP at the facility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured when 2 of 5 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A and LPN B) nurses left 2 of 6 (North Hall medication cart and North Hall treatment cart) medication storage areas unsecured and unattended. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Medication Storage, revealed .All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) under proper temperature controls.Only authorized personnel will have access to the keys to locked compartments.During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart.Narcotics and Controlled Substances.Schedule II drugs and back-up stock of Schedule III, IV and V medications are stored under double-lock and key.Schedule II controlled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain and ensure the prevention and spread of infection when 1of 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A) nurses failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes for 1 of 2 (Resident #32) sampled for wound care and when 1 of 3 (LPN B) nurses failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during enteral medication administration for 1 of 1 (Resident #62) sampled resident observed for medication administration by way of (via) percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) revealed .To implement enhanced barriers precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms .All staff receive training on enhanced barrier precautions upon hire and at least annually.An order for EBP will be obtained for residents with any of the following: wounds.feeding tubes.indwelling medical devices. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, kitchen sanitation logs, refrigerator temperature logs, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions when the kitchen floor was dirty with pieces of paper scattered on the floor, a black rubber floor mat was sticky and had crumbs and particles under it, the deep fryer had a sticky build up, the oven handles were sticky and the oven had crumbs in it, and 3 dry food storage bins had crumbs and thick sticky area in the outer edge of the lids. The facility failed to log refrigerator temperatures on the nutrition refrigerator and had an undated item in it. The facility had a census of 62 with 62 of those residents receiving a tray from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Refrigerators and Freezers, dated 10/2024, revealed .Monthly tracking sheets will include time, temperature .and initials .employees will check and record refrigerator and freezer temperatures daily . Review of the facility policy titled Sanitation, dated 10/2024, revealed .The food service area shall be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, Center for Disease Control (CDC) Guidelines, Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) Signage, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were maintained when 3 of 6 (Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) D, L, and O) staff members failed to perform hand hygiene during meal pass and placed dirty trays on the cart with clean trays and when Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was not used or contained appropriately. The facility failed to don PPE when performing wound care for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #8) of 4 residents reviewed. The findings: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Initiating Transmission-Based Precautions (TBA) (Isolation) (Contact, Enhanced, Airborne, Droplet), dated 4/2024, revealed .Transmission Based Precautions will be initiated when there is a reason to believe that a resident has a communicable infectious disease .When Transmission Based Precautions are implemented, the following is recommended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, review of facility Infection Surveillance monitoring documents, and interview, the facility failed to establish and implement a program to identify, report, investigate and control infections and communicable diseases when staff (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G) failed to track organisms being treated in the facility and monitor for outbreaks and cross contamination. This had the potential to affect 62 of 62 residents in the facility. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised 1/2024, revealed .The community Infection Prevention and Control Program is designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections .The program establishes facility-wide systems for the prevention, identification, reporting, investigation and control of infections and communicable diseases of residents, staff, and visitors . 2. Review of the undated map provided with the December 2024 Infection monitoring reports…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services guidelines and interviews the facility failed to provide a qualified Infection Control Preventionist who was responsible to monitor and maintain the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. This could have affected 62 out of 62 residents currently residing in the facility. The findings include: 1. Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services factsheet titled, Updated Guidance for Nursing Home Resident Health and Safety, dated June 29, 2022, revealed . Requires facilities have a part-time Infection Preventionist (IP) .While the requirement is to have at least a part-time IP, the IP must meet the needs of the facility . The IP must physically work onsite and cannot be an off-site consultant or work at a separate location . IP role is critical to mitigating infectious diseases through an effective infection prevention and control program .IP specialized Training is required and available . 2. During an interview on 3/5/2025 at 3:04 PM LPN G was asked, do you know the types of bacteria you would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 19 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to honor food preferences for 1 of 24 (Resident #35) residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Food Preferences . dated 10/2024, revealed .Nutritional assessments will include an evaluation of individual food preferences. Residents receive food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs, including preferences . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Morbid (Severe) Obesity, Muscle Weakness, Bariatric Surgery Status, and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease. Review of Progress Note dated 10/15/2024, revealed . Continue to honor food preferences and encourage fluid restriction compliance Review of the care plan dated 12/13/2024, revealed .at risk for impaired nutrition .Honor food preferences and update PRN [as needed] . Review of the annual Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive resident admission assessment within 14 calendar days after admission for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #215) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: 1.Review of the RAI Manual Version 3.0 dated 10/2023, revealed, .For the admission assessment, the MDS [Minimum Data Set] Completion Date (Z0500B) must be no later than 13 days after the Entry Date (A1600) . For the admission assessment, the Care Area Assessment (CAA) Completion Date (V0200B2) must be no later more than 13 days after the Entry Date (A1600) . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #215 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Wedge Compression Fracture of T7 - T8 (break in the vertebrae located at the 7th and 8th thoracic level of the spine), Wedge Compression Fracture of T11-T12 (break in the vertebrae located at the 11th and 12th…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment for 1 resident (Resident #57) of 21 residents reviewed. The findings include: 1.Review of CMS's RAI Version 3.0 Manual Chapter 2 dated 10/2023 revealed .Guidelines to Assist in Deciding If a Change Is Significant or Not .When a .Resident enrolls in a hospice program .must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Hyperlipidemia, and Hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #57's Discharge Summary from Hospital #1 dated 12/2/2024, revealed, General Information .12/2 [12/2/2024] return to LTC [Long Term Care, hospice/palliative care to follow . Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete resident assessments, using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-specific RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) process, within the regulatory time frames for 2 of 21 sampled residents (Resident #28 and #48) reviewed for completion of the MDS resident assessments. The findings include: 1. Review of the MDS 3.0 RAI Manual v (version) 1.19.1 October 2024, page 5-2 revealed . For the admission assessment, the Care Area Assessment (CAA) Completion Date .must be no later more than 13 days after the Entry Date .For the Annual assessment, the CAA Completion Date .must be no later than 14 days after the ARD 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Diabetes, Dementia, Contractures of Bilateral Lower Legs, Depression and Anxiety. Review of the annual MDS with an Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for 2 of 21 (Residents #55 and #215) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 8/2024, revealed .An individualized comprehensive centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, cultural and psychological needs is developed for each resident .Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change .if a history of trauma, interventions for care that address such based upon known interventions from qualified professions, and interventions that the staff may use to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization .Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to .Incorporate identified problem areas .incorporate risk factors associated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to update or revise the care plans for 4 of 21 (Resident #55, #56, #57, and #220) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 8/2024, revealed .An individualized comprehensive centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, cultural and psychological needs is developed for each resident .Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change . If a history of trauma, interventions for care that address such based upon known interventions from qualified professions, and interventions that the staff may use to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization .Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to .Incorporate identified problem areas .incorporate risk factors associated with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident #215) had clean and groomed fingernails. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Care of Fingernails/Toenails, dated 10/2024 revealed, .The purpose of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections .Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #215 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Wedge Compression Fracture of T7 - T8 (break in the vertebrae located at the 7th and 8th thoracic level of the spine), Wedge Compression Fracture of T11-T12 (break in the vertebrae located at the 11th and 12th thoracic level of the spine), Acute Respiratory Failure, Unspecified Cirrhosis of Liver, and Chronic Systolic Congestive Heart Failure. Review of Resident #215's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow Physician orders related to parameters for the use of as needed (PRN) pain medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #44) reviewed for unnecessary medications; and related to Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) medication administration for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #3) reviewed for medication administration, and failed to collaborate care with Hospice Services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #515) reviewed for Hospice. The findings: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration ., dated 2/2024, revealed .Prior to preparing or administering medications .Facility staff should verify that the medication name and dose are correct when compared to the medication order on the medication administration record . Review of the facility policy titled, Hospice Program ., dated 10/2024, revealed .Obtain a physician's order for Hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility policy, facility list of residents that wander, medical record review, observation and interview the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for 1 of 21 (Resident #34) sampled residents when nursing staff left razors open and unattended on a table in Resident #34's room. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Needlesticks and Cuts, dated 4/2024 revealed, .Personnel will follow our facility's established procedures to help prevent injuries caused by .sharp blades, broken glass, or other sharp instruments or devices .Staff shall place .sharp objects in puncture-resistant containers . 2. Review of the facility list of residents that wander revealed 5 residents that frequently wander within the facility. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Unspecified Systolic Congestive Heart Failure, Muscle Weakness, Unsteadiness on feet, Need for Assistance with personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to have a physician's order for a resident's dialysis treatments, failed to assess and monitor the dialysis site for a thrill (palpable vibration felt over a vessel), and infection, failed to weigh or get vital signs, and failed to have an accurate individualized care plan for 1 of 1 (Resident #48) sampled residents for dialysis. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans ., dated 8/2024, revealed .An individualized comprehensive centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's .needs is developed for each resident .Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change .Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to .Incorporate identified problem areas .incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems .The Care Planning/Interdisciplinary is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order for hospice care and a foley catheter for 1 of 21 (Resident #53) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Hospice Program ., dated 6/2021, revealed, .Obtain a physician's order for Hospice services to include diagnosis . Review of the facility's policy titled, admission Orders, Physician Orders . dated 5/2023, revealed, . Residents will have orders for their immediate care . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Pleural Effusion, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Atrial Fibrillation, and Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #53 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated that Resident #53 was cognitively intact. Resident #53 was not assessed for an indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the facility policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain Registered Nurse (RN) Coverage for 8 consecutive hours a day 7 days a week. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy review titled Nursing Services dated 3/2025 revealed .The community provides adequate staffing with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure residents safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The community will provide licensed nursing staff 24 hours a day, 7 days a week . 2. Review of facility list of RNs revealed, the facility had a Director of Nursing (DON) and 3 additional RNs on staff. Review of the December 2024 weekend Punch Detail revealed no RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours on 12/1/2024, 12/13/2024, and 12/20/2024. Review of January 2025 weekend Punch Detail revealed no RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours on 1/17/2025 and 1/31/2025. Review of the staffing clock in and out punches for 1/17/25 through 3/3/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence of a monthly pharmacist drug regimen review for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents #38 and #44) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Regimen Reviews, dated 2/2025, revealed .Provide the Attending Physician with access or a process to document in the resident's medical record that: a. The irregularity that has been reviewed; b. Action if any that has been taken to address it; and c. Rationale for no change based upon the reported irregularity . 2.Review of medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Failure, Dementia, and Hypertension. Review of the Physician's orders dated 8/30/2023, revealed .RisperDAL .37.5 MG [milligram] .Inject 2 ml [milliliter] intramuscularly at bedtime every 14 day(s) related to Dementia . Review of the Physician's orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly and securely stored when medications were left unattended on 1 of 4 medication carts (medication cart #1) and the facility failed to date an opened multi-dose vial of refrigerated Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (aids in the detection of infection) in the medication refrigerator in 1 of 2 (East) medication rooms. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications ., dated 10/2024, revealed, .The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Medications requiring refrigeration must be stored in a refrigerator located in the drug room . and be labeled accordingly. Review of the facility policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, dated 2/2024, revealed, Facility staff should not leave medications or chemicals unattended. Facility staff should enter the date opened on the label of medications with shortened expiration dates. Review of the undated package insert for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0851 — isolatedElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, Quarterly Payroll Based Journal (PBJ), and interview the facility failed maintain adequate staffing on the weekend for 3 of 4 Quarters in 2024. The facility failed to maintain higher than a One Star Staffing Rating for 4 of 4 Quarters. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy review titled Nursing Services dated 3/2025 revealed .The community provides adequate staffing with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure residents safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The community will provide licensed nursing staff 24 hours a day, 7 days a week . 2. Review of the Quarterly PBJ dated January 1 - March 31, 2024, revealed the facility Triggered for One Star Staffing Rating and Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. Review of the Quarterly PBJ dated April 1 - June 30, 2024, revealed the facility Triggered for One Star Staffing Rating. Review of the Quarterly PBJ dated July 1 - September 30, 2024, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to promote and maintain residents' dignity when staff failed to provide a privacy bag for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #9 and #17) reviewed with indwelling urinary catheters. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Indwelling Urinary Catheters, dated 5/2021, documented, .Cover the urine bag to provide privacy .Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #9 had diagnoses of Paraplegia, Neuralgia, and Neurogenic Bladder. Review of the Physician's Order dated 12/9/2020, revealed Resident #9 had an indwelling urinary catheter. Observation in the resident's room on 6/28/2021 at 12:23 PM and 3:14 PM, and on 6/29/2021 at 8:10 AM and 10:30 AM, revealed Resident #9's urinary drainage bag was uncovered and seen in the doorway. Observation in the hallway on 6/30/2021 at 9:34 AM and 2:09 PM, revealed Resident #9 propelled herself in her wheelchair and her urinary drainage bag was uncovered. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, employee file review, payroll time punch review, and interview, the facility failed to implement and follow their abuse policies when employee background checks were not performed for 2 of 8 staff (Registered Nurse (RN) #1 and Dietary [NAME] #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The findings include: The facility's Employee Background Checks (Screening) policy last approved on 5/2021, revealed .The community will not employ or otherwise engage individuals whom have been found guilty of abuse, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by court of law, entered into the State nurse aide registry or against the professional license they hold with the state licensure body .The facility administration and employees are committed to protecting resident from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff .staff from other agencies providing services to our .residents .Background checks are completed .on each employee . Review of the employee personal files revealed RN #1 had a hire date of 5/21/2021. Review of the payroll…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to properly store and maintain medications safely when 1 of 3 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2) left medications unattended and out of sight for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #18 and #34) observed during medication administration. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medication F 761, revised 4/2007, revealed .Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received .The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage AND preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner . Observation outside the resident's room on 6/29/2021 at 8:30 AM, revealed LPN #2 prepared medications for Resident #18. LPN #2 placed Seroquel, Coreg, Gabapentin, Xanax, Diltiazem, finasteride, Lisinopril, Oxybutynin Chloride, Protonix, Polyethylene Glycol, Flomax, and thiamine in a open medication cup and took a Humalog KwikPen Solution into Resident #18's room. LPN #2 placed the medications on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Guidelines review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #17) reviewed in isolation when the resident was observed out of the room and with other residents, and when 1 of 1 nurse (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1) failed to perform hand hygiene during wound care. The findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance titled, .Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Nursing Homes, dated 3/29/2021, revealed .new admissions and readmissions should be placed in a 14-day quarantine . Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Washing/Hand Hygiene F 880, dated 5/2021, revealed .This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections .Employees must wash their hands for at least twenty (20) seconds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES — 30 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 29 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBD LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 01/01/2015 |
| BARRES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2015 |
| T AND C CAPITAL ASSETS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2015 |
| WINDWARD HEALTH PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2015 |
| CRINO, BRYAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2015 |
| FEUER, SCOTT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2015 |
| LINDEMAN, STUART | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2015 |
| PASSERO, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2015 |
| YOAKUM, JAMIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/19/2024 |
| MISSION HEALTH OF GEORGIA, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| BARNES, MICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $357K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445477. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.