No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gonzales Healthcare Center

905 West Cornerview Road, Gonzales, LA 70737 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (225) 644-5358 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$92,032 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $92,032 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-14)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
13201 Highway 73 · (225) 673-2088 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
12506 Highway 73 · (225) 677-7607 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
12513 Highway 73 · (225) 673-6504 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Arrowhead Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
12189 River Walk Dr · (504) 450-6688

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.3%17.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.2%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.2%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%2.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened30.1%17.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.3%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%5.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.4%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.1%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%3.1%1.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.8%76.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission43.0%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.3%14.8%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
24.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 24.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.5%CMS range 31.5–54.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 8.1–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge24.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge32.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge16.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.2–13.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.091.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.19
RN hours/ resident / day
1.54
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.84
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
43.5%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 85.0 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-13)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-07)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly secure residents in the facility's transportation vehicles for 2 (Resident #5 and Random Resident #6) of 2 (Resident #5 and Random Resident #6) sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 08/22/2024 at 11:47 a.m. for Resident #5 when S6Driver failed to properly secure the resident in a forward facing direction in the facility's transportation bus, Resident #5's wheelchair tipped over backwards during transport, and caused Resident #5 to strike the back of her head. Resident #5 was transported to the hospital where she was assessed as having an abrasion to the back of the head and had to receive pain medication. The IJ continued on 09/03/2024 at 12:30 p.m. for Random Resident #6, when S4ActivitiesDirector (AD) was observed failing to secure Random Resident #6 into the facility's transport van using both the lap belt and the shoulder strap and left the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-09-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently by failing to have an adequate system in place to ensure residents were properly restrained in the facility's transportation vehicles, vehicle transportation logs were completed as required for the facility's transportation vehicles, and the facility's transportation drivers were competent on the use of the facility's van and bus restraint systems prior to transporting residents. This lack of administrative oversight resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 08/22/2024 at 11:47 a.m. for Resident #5 when S6Driver failed to properly secure the resident in a forward facing direction in the facility's transportation bus, Resident #5's wheelchair tipped over backwards during transport, and caused Resident #5 to strike the back of her head. Resident #5 was transported to the hospital where she was assessed as having an abrasion to the back of the head and had to receive pain medication. The IJ continued on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident remained free from neglect and psychosocial harm when nursing staff failed to provide care and services to a newly admitted resident for 1 (Resident #5) of 19 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #18, and Resident #19) reviewed for neglect. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm on 02/08/2024 at 10:00 p.m. when S6Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and S7Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) both arrived to work at 10:00 p.m. and failed to receive a nursing report (a verbal report on a residents current medical condition and care needs) from the off-going nursing staff that the facility had a new admit, Resident #5. Resident #5 was discovered on 02/09/2024 at approximately 3:00 a.m. sitting alone in her wheelchair in a dark…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an allegation of physical abuse for 2 (Resident #21 and Resident #60) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. Findings:Review of the facility's Training on Resident-to-Resident Abuse Prevention and Response policy and procedure revised on 10/22/2025 revealed, in part, the facility would conduct a thorough investigation and document all findings and actions taken. Review of the facility's documentation of the investigation sent to the state agency on 04/29/2026 revealed, in part, Resident #60 was the reported victim and Resident #21 was the reported accused for an allegation of physical abuse. S1Administrator further wrote the incident was witnessed by staff and residents. Resident #21 Review of Resident #21's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/10/2026 revealed, in part, Resident #21 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 15, which indicated Resident #21 was cognitively intact. In an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an ordered nutritional supplement was provided for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for nutritional supplements.Findings:Review of Resident #5's clinical record revealed Resident #5 had diagnoses which included Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition.Review of Resident #5's May 2026 physician orders revealed an order for a Mighty Shake nutritional supplements to be given to Resident #5 with lunch and supper.Review of Resident #5's Care plan with implementation date of 10/16/2025 revealed to provide Resident #5 with nutritional supplements as ordered.Observation on 05/11/2026 at 12:01PM revealed Resident #5's lunch meal tray did not contain the ordered Mighty Shake supplement.Observation on 05/12/2026 at 12:10PM revealed Resident #5's lunch meal tray did not contain the ordered Mighty Shake supplement.In an interview on 05/13/2026 at 9:29AM, S3Assistant Director of Nursing indicated Resident #5 was to receive Mighty Shake supplements from dietary with his lunch and supper meal tray. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to:1. Ensure a Personal Protective Equipment gown was used during intravenous central line (tube placed in a large vein for medication administration) medication administration (Resident #5); and,2. Ensure proper hand hygiene during nephrostomy tube (catheter inserted into the kidney to drain urine) site care (Resident #55).This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #55) of 29 sampled residents observed and/or investigated during the medication administration and/or the infection control tasks. Findings:1. Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy and procedure, last reviewed on 03/03/2026 revealed, in part, applying personal protective equipment for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions was based on the activity provided and/or assistance needed while in the resident's room. Further review revealed Enhanced Barrier Precautions are used when there is an indwelling medical device such as central lines.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to: 1. ensure expired medications were not available for resident use on 2 (Medication Cart c, Medication Cart e) of 2 (Medication Cart c, Medication Cart e) medication carts observed; 2. ensure expired medications were not available for resident use in 2 (Medication Room h, Medication Room g) of 2 (Medication Room h, Medication Room g) medication rooms observed; and, 3. ensure food items were not stored in the medication room for 1 (Medication Room g) of 2 (Medication Room h, Medication Room g). Findings: Observation on 05/07/2025 at 9:19AM, revealed a bottle of Fish Oil 1000 milligrams (mg) capsule which expired on 02/2025 available for resident use on Medication Cart c. In an interview on 05/07/2025 at 9:20AM, S3Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicated the above mentioned medication should not have been on the Medication Cart. Observation on 05/07/2025 at 9:33AM revealed a half-eaten cake on the counter in Medication Room g. In an interview on 05/08/2025 at 9:36AM, S4Registered Nurse indicated the cake should not have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 2 (Resident #6, Resident #12) of 4 (Resident #6, Resident #12, Resident #37, Resident #51) sampled residents investigated for accommodation of needs. Findings: Review of the facility's Resident Call System policy, dated 10/2022 , reviewed on 03/28/2025 , revealed, in part, each resident will be provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor. Resident #6 Review of Resident #6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/06/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #6 required substantial and/or maximal assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) from staff. Observation on 05/05/25 at 11:11AM revealed Resident #6 was lying in bed and Resident #6's call light was noted out of reach, lying underneath the bed. Resident #12 Review of Resident #12's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/22/2025 revealed, in part,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan intervention for a low air loss mattress to bed was in place for 1 (Resident #6) of 2 (Resident #6, Resident #30) sampled residents investigated for pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device). Findings: Review of the facility's Quality Assurance (QA) Meeting Minutes dated 04/29/2025 revealed, no documentation that wound management or missing medical equipment was discussed or tracked as part of the facility's QA monitoring. Review of Resident #6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/06/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #6 had a diagnosis of a Stage IV Pressure Ulcer (PU) (a wound that extends into deep tissues including muscle, tendons, and ligaments). Review of Resident #6's Weekly Wound Observation Tool dated 04/29/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #6 had a Stage IV PU to the sacrum. Review of Resident #6's active May 2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident remained free from neglect when nursing staff failed to provide peri-care for 1(Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for neglect. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated 05/17/2024, revealed, in part, neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of, good or services that a resident(s) requires but the facility fails to provide them to the resident(s), that has resulted in or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review of Resident #3's medical records revealed, in part, Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dysphagia following cerebral infarction,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement the facility's abuse policy by failing to ensure staff reported an allegation of abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy and procedure, revised on 05/17/2024, revealed in part, each resident had the right to be free from abuse and mistreatment. Further review revealed verbal abuse was defined as use of oral language that willfully included derogatory terms to residents. Further review revealed any employee who became aware of an allegation of abuse should report the incident to the abuse coordinator immediately. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/17/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15, which indicated Resident #1's cognition was intact. In an interview on 03/03/2025 at 11:21AM, Resident #1 indicated S7Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was disrespectful to her last night and told her to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse and/or neglect to the State Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy and procedure, revised on 05/17/2024, revealed in part, mental abuse was defined as humiliation and threats of depravation, examples of verbal/mental abuse included denying food or care. Further review revealed the facility would report all allegations of abuse to the State Agency immediately or within two hours of the allegation. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/17/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated Resident #1's cognition was intact. Further review revealed Resident #1 had a diagnosis of cerebral palsy (a condition that affects muscle control and causes deficits in functional mobility), impaired range of motion in her bilateral upper extremities, and was dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to provide sufficient evidence that ongoing monitoring and evaluations were implemented to ensure corrective actions were put in place after many allegations of abuse and neglect were identified in 2024. Findings: Review of the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) policy and procedure last reviewed on 01/2024 revealed, in part, the QAA committee would develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified deficiencies. Review of the facility's Immediate Plan of Improvement: Abuse and Neglect record dated 01/05/2025 revealed, in part, the facility identified a concern of having many abuse and neglect allegations in 2024. Further review revealed the corrective actions implemented by the facility were to initiate staff in-services on types of abuse and the importance of reporting suspected abuse or neglect immediately to the abuse coordinator (S1Administrator). Further review revealed the facility would implement a monthly in-service on abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to keep a resident free from staff to resident verbal abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy Revised 01/01/2024 revealed, in part: Intent: This protocol was intended to assist in the prevention of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Policy: The facility will prohibit neglect, mental or physical abuse, including involuntary seclusion and the misappropriation of property or finances of residents. Definitions: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, withholding or misappropriating property or money, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Verbal Abuse is defined as the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging or derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional for 1 (S4Former Activities Director) of 1 (S4Former Activities Director) staff personnel files reviewed for activities director qualifications. Findings: Review of the facility's job description for the Activities Director revealed, in part, the following education and experience requirements: Education: must possess, as a minimum, two years of college. Degree preferred but not necessary. Experience: Must be a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who is licensed by this state and is eligible for certification as a recreation specialist or as an activities professional; or Must have a minimum two year experience in a social or recreation program within the last five years, one of which was full time in a patient activities program in a health care setting; or Must be a qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant; or Must have completed a training course approved by this state. Review of S4FAD's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the investigation of an allegation of neglect was reported to the State Survey agency within the required time frame for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated. Findings: Resident #1 Review of the Health Standards Incident Report (HSIR) dated 09/03/2024 at 9:18 a.m. revealed, in part, a an allegation of neglect involving Resident #1 was reported to the State Survey Agency on 09/03/2024 at 9:18 a.m. Further review revealed a final investigation report was due on 09/10/2024 at close of business. Review of S2Interim Administrator's email dated 09/10/2024 at 4:12 p.m. revealed, in part, S2Interim Administrator emailed a State Survey Agency Program Manager to request an extension for the due date to report the results of the above mentioned investigation. Review of an email dated 09/10/2024 at 4:31 p.m. revealed, in part, an extension was granted for 09/12/2024 by close of business. Review the HSIR dated 09/10/2024 revealed, in part, S1Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an allegation of neglect for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled resident investigated for neglect. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition last reviewed on 05/17/2024 revealed, in part, the facility will thoroughly investigate all alleged violations of neglect and take appropriate actions. Further review revealed the facility was to conduct interviews and/or obtain written statements from individuals, (residents, visitors, or staff) who may have firsthand knowledge of the incident. Review of the Health Standards Incident Report (HSIR) revealed, in part, there was an allegation of neglect involving Resident #2 for timely incontinence care. Resident #2 Review of S5Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 's witness statement pertaining to an investigation regarding an allegation of neglect involving Resident #2 revealed, in part, the witness statement was a photocopy of an alleged conversation between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to provide sufficient evidence that ongoing monitoring and evaluations were implemented to ensure corrective actions were put in place after identification of residents not receiving incontinence care as needed. Findings: Review of the facility's policy title, Quality Assurance Policy and Procedure last revised on March 2023 revealed, in part, the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee would regularly review and analyze data collected and make improvements. Further review revealed the QAA committee would develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. Review of the facility's QAA Plan of Action and Implementation record revealed, in part, a plan of action was implemented for timely documentation for activities of daily living (ADL) on 04/18/2024 as a result of deficient practice cited on a prior complaint survey conducted on 03/14/2024. Review of Quality Assessment and Assurance Plan of Action and Implementation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by staff. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy review dated 05/17/2024 revealed, in part, verbal abuse was defined as the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging or derogatory terms to the residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Review of the facility's documentation related to an incident dated 07/26/2024 revealed an anonymous bystander from Resident #1's physician's office and staff from Resident #1's physician office reported to the facility that they witnessed S4Transportation Driver (S4TD) refuse to assist Resident #1 with filling out his paperwork and yelled nothing was wrong with his hands…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report the results of an investigation to the required state agency within 5 working days of a reportable incident for 1 (Resident #6) of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7) residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. Findings: Review of Resident #6's Facility Reported Incident entered on 05/30/2024 revealed an allegation of neglect. Review of the Facility Reported Incident log documentation revealed Resident #6 had an incident reported on 05/30/2024 and the investigation report was due to the state survey agency on 06/06/2024. In an interview on 06/13/2024 at 1:45 p.m., S4Corporate Clinical Specialist stated the results of Resident #6's investigation were submitted to the state survey agency on 06/07/2024 and should have been submitted by 06/06/2024. .

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alleged incident of neglect was thoroughly investigated by the facility for 1 (Resident #4) of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7) residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. Findings: Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/30/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated Resident #4's cognition was intact. Further review revealed Resident #4 required substantial/maximal assistance from staff for toileting and partial/moderate assistance from staff for toilet transfers. Review of the Resident #4's facility incident report dated on 05/29/2024 revealed, in part, an investigation was initiated for Resident #4 with an allegation of neglect. Further review revealed Resident #4 reported problems receiving timely care from the night staff. S1Administrator documented Resident #4 was not forthcoming with information and provided no specific date or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received timely incontinence care for 1 (Resident #5) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) sampled residents investigated for incontinence care . Findings: Review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/22/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #5 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated Resident #5 had moderately impaired cognition. Further review revealed Resident #5 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and dependent on staff for toileting. Review of the facility's incident report dated 05/29/2024 revealed, in part, the report was initiated for an allegation of neglect. Further review revealed Resident #5 reported on 05/30/2024 she was not changed by the day shift Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 05/29/2024. Further review revealed the facility identified S7CNA as the accused associate with the allegation and obtained a verbal statement from S7CNA on 05/31/2024. Further review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #239 for 1 (Resident #75) of 8 (Resident #11, Resident #37, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #75, Resident #239, Resident #20, and Resident #23) sampled residents investigated for abuse and neglect; 2. Protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #43 and Resident #47 for 2 (Resident #43 and Resident #47) of 8 (Resident #11, Resident #37, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #75, Resident #239, Resident #20, and Resident #23) sampled residents investigated for abuse and neglect; 3. Protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse and neglect by S11Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) for 1 (Resident #37) of 8 (Resident #11, Resident #37, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #75, Resident #239, Resident #20, and Resident #23) sampled residents investigated for abuse and neglect; and, 4. Protect a resident's right to be free from neglect by S16CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to administer a resident's tube feeding water flush as ordered for 1 (Resident #50) of 1 (Resident #50) sampled residents investigated for tube feeding. Findings: Review of Resident #50's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/10/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #50 had dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and required nutrition and hydration through a feeding tube. Review of Resident #50's May 2024 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order for Resident #50's tube feeding water flush at 150 milliliters (mL) every 6 hours. Review of Resident #50's tube feeding care plan revealed, in part, an intervention for staff to administer Resident #50's tube feeding flush at 150mL every 6 hours. Observation on 05/13/2024 at 10:15 a.m. revealed Resident #50's tube feeding pump was programmed to administer a water flush of 125mL every 4 hours. Observation on 05/14/2024 at 10:57 a.m. revealed Resident #50's tube feeding pump was programmed to administer a water flush of 125mL every 4 hours. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for 1 (Resident #43) of 8 (Resident #11, Resident #20, Resident #23, Resident #37, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #75, and Resident #239) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Findings: Review of Resident #43's record revealed an admit date of 10/04/2023 with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with late onset. Review of Resident #43's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/24/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #43 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 6 which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed there were no documented behaviors. Review of Resident #43's Progress Notes revealed a nurse's note written on 04/19/2024 at 10:15 a.m. by S6Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) that revealed S10Certfied Nursing Assistant (CNA) informed S6LPN that Resident #43's left cheek and left corner of her lip was swollen and red. In an interview on 05/15/2024 at 10:00 a.m., S6LPN stated on 04/19/2024 upon assessment of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for 1 (Resident #43) of 8 (Resident #11, Resident #20, Resident #23, Resident #37, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #75, and Resident #239) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Findings: Review of Resident #43's record revealed an admit date of 10/04/2023 with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with late onset. Review of Resident #43's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/24/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #43 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 6 which indicated Resident #43's cognition was severely impaired. Review of Resident #43's Progress Notes revealed a nurse's note written on 04/19/2024 at 10:15 a.m. by S6Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) that revealed S10Certfied Nursing Assistant (CNA) informed S6LPN that Resident #43's left cheek and the left corner of Resident #43's lip was swollen and red. In an interview on 05/15/2024 at 12:10 p.m., S10Certfied Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated on 04/19/2024 she notified S6LPN regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not have an order for administration of a psychotropic medication (drugs that affect one's mental state) on an as needed basis (PRN) without a physician's documentation of the specified duration of the order for 1 (Resident #46) of 5 (Resident #16, Resident #46, Resident #47, Resident #64, and Resident #82) sampled resident investigated for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of Resident #46's admission record revealed, in part, Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified mood disorder and bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings of extreme excitement or extreme depressive feelings). Review of Resident #46's May 2024 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order with a start date of 11/20/2023 for Lorazepam (a psychotropic medication used to treat anxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety related to bipolar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to administer a medication for hypertension as ordered by the physician for 1 (Resident #14) of 22 (Resident #11, Resident #14, Resident #16, Resident #21, Resident #37, Resident #43, Resident #46, Resident #47, Resident #48, Resident #50, Resident #52, Resident #54, Resident #57,Resident #62, Resident #64, Resident #69, Resident #75, Resident #82, Resident #87, Resident #88, Resident #239, and Resident #440) residents investigated in the sample. Findings: Review of the manufacturers prescribing information for Clonidine revealed, in part, application of a new system to a fresh skin site at weekly intervals continuously maintains therapeutic plasma concentrations of clonidine. If the patch is removed and not replaced with a new system, therapeutic plasma clonidine levels will persist for about 8 hours and then decline slowly over several days. Over this time period, blood pressure returns gradually to pretreatment levels. Resident #14 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to obtain a resident's most recent hospice Plan of Care, recertification of terminal illness, and documentation of hospice services provided for 1 (Resident #50) of 1 (Resident #50) sampled resident reviewed for hospice. Findings: Review of Resident #50's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/12/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #50 had diagnoses which included stroke, seizure disorder, and malnutrition. Further review revealed Resident #50 received hospice care while a resident in the facility. Review of Resident #50's May 2024 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order to admit Resident #50 to the Contracted Hospice Agency on 02/23/2022. Review of the facility's agreement with the Contracted Hospice Agency dated 02/04/2022 related to Resident #50's hospice services revealed, in part, the following: -The hospice interdisciplinary team, in consultation with the facility, shall review and revise Resident #50's individualized Plan of Care as frequently as Resident #50's condition required, but no less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) completed hand hygiene during incontinence and catheter care for 1 (Resident #57) of 1 (Resident #57) residents reviewed for catheter care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, reviewed on 01/24/2024 revealed, in part, staff should perform hand hygiene before and after direct contact with residents, before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care, after contact with bodily fluids, and after removing gloves. Further review revealed the use of gloves does not replace hand washing/hand hygiene, and glove use along with routine hand hygiene was recognized as the best practice for preventing healthcare-associated infections. Review of Resident #57's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/27/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #57 had a urinary catheter (a device that sits in the bladder and collects urine), was always incontinent of bowel, and had a urinary tract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following an allegation of neglect for 6 (Resident #2, Resident #6, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, and Resident #17) of 19 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #18, and Resident #19) residents investigated for neglect. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy with a revision date of 11/07/2023 revealed, in part, each resident had the right to be free from neglect and the facility will prohibit neglect of residents. Further review of the investigation component of the Abuse Prohibition policy revealed, in part, the facility will complete a thorough investigation to include where and when the incident occurred and interviews and/or written statements from individuals (residents, visitors, or staff), who may have firsthand knowledge of the incident. Further review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff answered call bells to assist residents timely with toileting and/or incontinence care for 6 residents (Resident #2, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, and Resident #17) of 19 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, and #19) sampled for incontinence care and toileting Findings: Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/12/2024 revealed, in part, a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 15. A BIMS score of 15 indicated Resident #5 was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #2 was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan with a revision date of 02/13/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #2 had an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit with impaired mobility. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an incontinent resident dependent on staff for incontinence care received timely incontinence care for 1 (Resident #14) of 19 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #18, and Resident #19) sampled residents investigated for incontinence care. Findings: Resident #14 Review of Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 01/12/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #14's cognition was intact, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and dependent on staff for toileting. Review of the facility's investigation documentation for Resident #14 revealed, in part, on 02/11/2024, S13CNA reported Resident #14's bed linens were found wet with brown spots. Further review revealed the accused, S12CNA, reported Resident #14 never indicated she needed to be changed, and S12CNA did not check under the bed covers to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was developed for a resident identified as being at high risk for falls for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) sampled residents in which the care plans were reviewed. Findings: Review of Resident #1's record, revealed an admit date of 12/06/2023, and had the following diagnoses: Displaced Bi-malleolar (ankle) fracture of right lower leg, and subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Date Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/13/2023, revealed Resident #1 was mildly cognitively impaired, and was dependent on staff for toileting, sit to stand and transfers, putting on/taking off footwear, and lower body dressing. Review of Resident #1's Nurse's Notes revealed on 12/06/2023, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility after a stay at a local hospital due to a fall at home in which he sustained a broken right ankle. Further review revealed a late entry note written on 12/27/2023 that a fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a dependent and incontinent resident with a history of urinary tract infections was provided incontinence care per the facility's policy and procedures for 1 (Resident #2) of 4 Residents (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled. 2. Ensure a resident who completed self-catheterization was monitored for urine output and signs and/or symptoms of urinary tract infections for 1 (Resident #4) of 4 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled. Findings: 1. Review of facility's policy and procedure on Perineal Care revealed, in part, the purpose of this procedure is to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation. Further review revealed staff should use a wet wash cloth to clean perineal area and wash from front to back. Review of the Resident #2's EMR (electronic medical record) revealed, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of stress incontinence (the sudden, involuntary loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Protect residents (Resident #10 and Resident #12) from resident to resident physical abuse; and, 2. Ensure a resident (Resident #5) was free from neglect by failing to provide incontinence care timely. This deficient practice was identified for 3 (Resident #10, Resident #12, and Resident #5) of 13 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, and Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for abuse and neglect. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy, revised 11/07/2023 revealed, in part, each resident has the right to be free from abuse. Resident #10 Review of Resident #10's record revealed, in part, diagnoses of personal history of transient ischemic attach, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of Resident #10's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/17/2024 revealed, in part, a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property/financial abuse/Exploitation for 1 (Resident #3) of 13 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, and Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for misappropriation of resident property. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy revealed, in part, misappropriation of property/financial abuse/Exploitation was defined as taking advantage of a resident for personal gain through the use of manipulation, intimidation, threats or coercion. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Data dated 12/01/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 which indicated being cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #3 had a diagnosis of Syringomyelia and Syringobulbia (a disease affecting the spinal cord causing pain), Disease of the spinal cord, and Lower back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident neglect were reported to the state agency within 24 hours of the allegation for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #10) of 13 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, and Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for neglect. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy revealed, in part, the facility will report all allegations of neglect without serious bodily injury within 24 hours of the allegation. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/13/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #4 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, stress incontinence and displaced bimalleolar (a bone in the ankle) fracture of the right lower leg. Further review revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 08, which indicated Resident #4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following allegations of neglect for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #10) of 13 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, and Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for neglect. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy revealed, in part, any allegations of neglect made by residents shall be reported to the Abuse Coordinator and investigated immediately. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/13/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #4 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, stress incontinence and displaced bimalleolar (a bone in the ankle) fracture of the right lower leg. Further review revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08, which indicated Resident #4 had moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation of physical abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 1(Resident #4) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #R5) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of Resident #4's S6Social Services Director's written notes or Review of Resident #4's written social service notes dated 11/30/2023 at 9:10 a.m. revealed, in part, BIMS assessment completed with no cues needed. Further review revealed, Resident #4 stated an aid treated me very badly. Review of Resident #4's nurse's note dated 11/30/2023 at 6:18 p.m. by S2Director of Nursing (DON) revealed, in part, head to toe skin check done by S3Assistant Director of Nursing. Further review revealed, Resident #4 was noted with a small discoloration to the left side temporal area with complaints that her head hit the wall and pain to the right rib area. Further review revealed the physician was notified and received new order for right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #4) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #R5) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy revised 11/07/2023 revealed, in part, the facility will thoroughly investigate all alleged violations and take appropriate actions. Further review revealed, investigations will be prompt, comprehensive, and responsive to the situation. Further review revealed the procedure for the investigation will include interviews and/or written statements from individuals (residents, visitors or staff) who may have firsthand knowledge of the incident. Further review of the procedure for investigation revealed, examination of the resident alleged to have been abused for appropriate interventions (medical, psychosocial, etc.). Review of Resident #4's nurse's note dated 11/30/2023 at 6:18 p.m. by S2Director of Nursing (DON) revealed, in part, head to toe skin check done by S3Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to immediately notify a resident's physician of a change in a resident's ability to tolerate an enteral feeding (a way of delivering nutrition directly to the stomach or small intestine through a tube) for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for enteral feedings. Findings: Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 07/18/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 15 which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Further review revealed, Resident #1 received 51% or more of calories through a feeding tube (a medical device inserted into the stomach used to administer enteral feedings). Review of Resident #1's nutrition/dietary note dated 08/02/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #1's enteral feeding was Osmolite 1.5 Cal (a tube feeding formula that provides complete, balanced nutrition with high calories and protein) 300 milliliters (ml) four times a day (QID). Further review revealed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to enhance a resident's tolerance of enteral feedings (a way of delivering nutrition directly to the stomach or small intestine through a tube) for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for enteral feedings. Findings: Review of the facility's Enteral Nutrition Policy revealed, in part, the dietitian would monitor residents who were receiving enteral nutrition and make appropriate recommendations for interventions to enhance a resident's tolerance of enteral feedings. Further review revealed, the nursing staff should monitor the resident for signs and symptoms of inadequate nutrition, altered hydration or electrolytes, and worsening conditions. Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 07/18/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 15 which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Further review revealed, Resident #1 received 51% or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance from staff with toileting received timely assistance to maintain personal hygiene per professional standards. This deficient practice was identified for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #5) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings: Review of the facility's Perineal Care Policy revealed, in part, the purpose of this procedure is to prevent infections and skin irritation. Review of steps in the procedure revealed, in part, wash hands and apply gloves; clean perineal area; change gloves; reposition; apply thin layer of skin barrier. Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedure revealed, in part, hand hygiene is the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Further review of the Policy Interpretation and Implementation of applying and removing gloves revealed, in part, perform hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have the nurse staffing information posted on a daily basis. Findings: Observation on 08/08/2023 at 9:44 a.m. revealed no posted staffing in the facility. Observation on 08/09/2023 at 9:05 a.m. revealed no posted staffing in the facility. Observation on 08/09/2023 at 12:45 p.m. revealed no posted staffing in the facility. Observation on 08/09/2023 at 3:30 p.m. revealed no posted staffing in the facility. Observation on 08/10/2023 at 9:55 a.m. revealed posted staffing dated 08/09/2023. In an interview on 08/10/2023 at 10:20 a.m., S2Director of Nursing (DON) stated nurse staffing data should be posted daily. S2DON acknowledged nurse staffing data was not posted on 08/09/2023. S2DON further acknowledged nurse staffing data posted on 08/10/2023 was not current. In an interview on 08/10/2023 at 11:05 a.m., S6Human Resources (HR) stated she was responsible for posting staffing daily. S6HR confirmed she did not post staffing on 08/08/2023. S6HR also confirmed she posted staffing on 08/09/2023 at the end of the day on 08/09/2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$92,032 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $84,014 — penalty dated 2024-08-14
  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-01-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXION HEALTH — 51 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 50 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bay Ridge Healthcare CenterLa Porte, TX 1 of 5Claiborne Healthcare CenterShreveport, LA 1 of 5Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCorinth, MS 1 of 5Crystal Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGreenwood, MS 1 of 5Duncanville Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterDuncanville, TX 1 of 5Flatonia Healthcare CenterFlatonia, TX 1 of 5Green Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Grenada Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGrenada, MS 1 of 5Holly Springs Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHolly Springs, MS 1 of 5Indianola Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterIndianola, MS 1 of 5Lily Springs Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterLampasas, TX 1 of 5Meadowview Health & Rehab CenterMinden, LA 1 of 5New Iberia Manor SouthNew Iberia, LA 1 of 5Patterson Healthcare CenterPatterson, LA 1 of 5Picayune Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPicayune, MS 1 of 5Pierremont Healthcare CenterShreveport, LA 1 of 5Prairie Meadows Rehabilitation and Healthcare CentFloresville, TX 1 of 5The Bluffs Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterVicksburg, MS 1 of 5Village Creek Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterLumberton, TX 1 of 5Willow Park Rehabilitation Health Care CenterClifton, TX 1 of 5Woodlands Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterClinton, MS 1 of 5Yazoo City Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterYazoo City, MS 2 of 5Great Oaks Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterByhalia, MS 2 of 5Kaplan Healthcare CenterKaplan, LA 2 of 5Many Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterMany, LA 2 of 5New Iberia Manor NorthNew Iberia, LA 2 of 5North Star Ranch Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenBonham, TX 2 of 5Willow Park Rehabilitation And Care CenterWillow Park, TX 3 of 5Barton Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterAustin, TX 3 of 5Cedar Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterPilot Point, TX 3 of 5Columbia Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterColumbia, MS 3 of 5Cross Timbers Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterFlower Mound, TX 3 of 5Delta Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCleveland, MS 3 of 5Golden Creek Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterNavasota, TX 3 of 5Lakeview Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterWinnsboro, TX 3 of 5Lone Star Ranch Rehabilitation and Healthcare CentKingsville, TX 3 of 5Midwestern Healthcare CenterWichita Falls, TX 3 of 5Natchez Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterNatchez, MS 3 of 5Ridgecrest Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterForney, TX 4 of 5Arbor Hills Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterEagle Lake, TX

Showing 40 of 50; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NEXION HEALTH OF OHI INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 12/31/2006
NEXION HEALTH LEASING, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/15/2002
NEXION HEALTH, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/15/2002
BOLT, BRETTONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/15/2002
KIRLEY, FRANCISIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/15/2002
JANUARY, YIESHAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/04/2019
OUBRE, WENDYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/02/2014
HERDRICH, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2012
REID, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/03/2018
RINER, MEERAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2012
LEE, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/15/2002

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$562K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 4%Other / private 30%

This home reported $562K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$293per resident / day
operating cost
$8,898per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$290per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195327. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next