Lily Springs Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
901 Central Texas Exp, Lampasas, TX 76550 · For profit - Individual · 116 certified beds · (512) 556-8827 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $86,207 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-12)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 37.2% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 3.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.9% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 33.9% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.1% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.7% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.5% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 37.8% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.0% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.3% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.10 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.78 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.8%CMS range 44.5–71.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.6%CMS range 8.0–18.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 67.6 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (resident #51) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to provide safe transport for Resident #51 on 01/17/25 that resulted in a fall and fracture to the right femur. This has led to anxiety around shower times, and a reduced quality of life. An IJ was identified on 05/02/2025 at 4:30 PM. The initial IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:38 PM. While the IJ was removed on 05/04/25 at 12:21 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at the scope of isolated and a severity of no actual harm due to the injury sustained by Resident #51. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #51's face sheet dated 04/16/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified fracture of the right femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(a disease that makes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, which included measurable objectives and timeframes that met a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a care plan which reflected Resident #1's Advanced Directive was full. Resident # 1 expired at the facility on [DATE] and there was no CPR performed . An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE]. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 3:11 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with a potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems . This failure could place residents at risk of injury, harm, impairment or death to a resident receiving care in this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-03 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide basic life support, including CPR, to a resident requiring emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and related physician orders and the residents advance directives for one of seven (Resident #1) residents reviewed for CPR . The facility failed to update Resident #1's records to reflect he requested a change in his code status on [DATE] from DNR (do not resuscitate) to Full Code. As a result, basic life support measures, which included CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) were not provided to Resident #1 when Resident #1 fell back in his bed while talking to Emergency Medical Services and expired on [DATE]. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE]. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 3:11 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with a potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, inter, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for three (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of seven residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to: 1) - Provide treatment and services to heal Resident #2's PUs on the gluteus, sacrum, and left heel and the wounds became larger. - Provide treatment and services to prevent infection to Resident #2's sacral PU and it became infected. An IJ situation was identified on 03/18/24.L The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:40 PM. While the IJ was removed on 03/19/24 the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity of potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective actions. 2) - Provide treatment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and failed to protect and promote the rights of the residents for one of four residents (Residents #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed ensure CNA A and CNA B identified themselves and explained or asked permission to perform a mechanical lift transfer and incontinent care for Resident #1 on 06/13/24. This failure led to Resident #1 exhibiting nonverbal signs of fear and/or pain including widened eyes, an open mouth, and facial grimacing during the procedure. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a decline of their sense of dignity, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free of discrimination from the facility in exercising his or her rights and to be supported by the facility to exercise his or her rights for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 had a place to have private telephone conversations when she did not consent to her roommate having electronic monitoring that included audio monitoring. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 gave permission before her property was searched by staff. These failures could place residents at risk of loss of privacy and loss of the ability to communicate privately which could result in a decline in their psychosocial well-being and quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section A (Identification Information) reflected a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to have a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #1 to address herbehavior of banging on the wall of her room that occurred on 05/05/2026 and two other times, dates unknown. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet individualized, behavioral, medical and nursing needs.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, undated, revealed a ninety year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive neurodegenerative brain disorder and the most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to be treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1 and 2 were spoken to with dignity by LVN A on 01/07/2026 during their smoke break. This failure placed residents at risk of anger and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), schizophrenia, and history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the admission MDS for Resident #1 dated 11/11/2025 reflected a BIMS score of 12, indicating only mildly impaired cognition. Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #2 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included anxiety disorder, vascular dementia, and depression. Review of the quarterly MDS for Resident #2 dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 call light was within reach on 11/12/2025.This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met.Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 11/12/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease (progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that makes it hard to breathe due to airflow obstruction and lung damage), lack of coordination (inability to perform smooth, controlled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided care and services to carry out activities of daily living to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of life.The facility failed to provide showers to Resident #2 in compliance with her shower schedule.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of decline in overall health.Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's admission record, dated 11/12/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia (memory loss and problems with thinking and reasoning), generalized anxiety disorder (mental health condition characterized by excessive and uncontrollable worry about everyday things), and major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest, making it hard to function in daily life). Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the residents' freedom retain and use personal possessions for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for personal property.The facility failed to allow Resident #1 to have a powered wheelchair because she had display aggressive behaviors.This failure could place resident at risk of not being able to retain personal property, at risk of feeling disrespected, having reduced dignity and diminished quality of life.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's undated Clinical sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (damage occurred in the right side of the brain, as the brain's right hemisphere controls the left side of the body), heart failure, unspecified (a general diagnosis of heart failure without further detail about its type or cause), muscle weakness (generalized) (a decrease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for care plans, in that: The facility failed to care plan Resident #1's history of refusal of Nystatin Powder medication from 06/13/25 to 08/12/25. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving goals and interventions for the residents' individual needs for person-centered care.Findings included:Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/22/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (paralysis (hemiplegia) or weakness (hemiparesis) of one side of the body, resulting from the damage to the brain by a lack of blood flow), mood disorder due to known physiological condition with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident # 24) reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Five staff (LVN D, LVN E, CNA, ADON, and ADM) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure hand hygiene practices were used when passing resident lunch trays to residents in the dining room. These failures could place residents at risk of transmission of disease and infection. Findings include: Observation on 07/10/2025 at 12:15 PM. During lunch service in the dining room, four staff members were getting food trays for the residents. LVN E, LVN D, and CNA were not sanitizing their hands between handing out food trays to residents in the dining area. Not once did LVN E, LVN D, and CNA sanitize their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the preferences of each resident, activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 5 of 5 confidential residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide activities to meet the residents' interests on Saturdays and Sundays for 5 confidential residents. The facility failed to provide activities to support the mental and physical wellbeing of the residents in the secured unit. These failures could place residents at risk for decline in quality of life, social and mental psychosocial wellbeing. Findings Include: Observation on 04/14/25 at 10:30 am in the hallways of the secured unit revealed 3 residents in the hallway walking in and out of open rooms. The ACT was conducting an activity with two residents and was walking in and out of the doorway watching the 3 wandering residents. Observation on 04/14/25 at 2:30 pm in the main room of the secured unit revealed the ACT was the only staff member visible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-05 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and review, the facility failed to have sufficient staff who provide direct services to residents to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 14/14 residents that reside in the secured unit. The facility failed to adequately staff the secured memory care unit (600 hallway) which resulted in a disproportionate number of incidents affecting the 600 hallway. This failure could place residents at risk for accidents with major injuries, boredom, depression, and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident #60 Record review of Resident #60's face sheet dated April 15, 2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease with late onset (a late onset of brain degeneration that include cognitive and memory functions), Dementia, and unspecified lack of coordination. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #116 and Resident #55) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNAs were conducting hand hygiene when changing gloves when providing peri-care to Resident #116 The facility failed to ensure CNAs were following Enhanced Barrier Precautions by donning a gown with gloves when providing care to Resident #116 and Resident #55. The facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was being conducted with glove changes during Resident #116's wound care. These failures could place residents at risk of transmission of disease and infection. Findings included: Resident #116 Record review of Resident #116's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations to meet the needs and preferences for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accommodations. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #47 had the call light device in reach while lying in bed. The facility failed to accommodate Resident #47 with a call light device that would meet their individual needs. This deficient practice could affect and diminish the resident's quality of life by potentially placing the resident at risk of injury, not receive timely care or receive nursing interventions to meet the resident's needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #47's Face Sheet dated 04/16/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Sepsis (condition that occurs when the body's response to an infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs), Kidney Failure (condition where the kidney reaches advanced state of loss of function. This causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement abuse reporting policies for one (Resident #51) of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to implement policies that required reporting of major injury after an incident on 01/17/25 where Resident #51 fell out of the shower chair while transporting back to his room from the shower and sustained a fracture to the right femur. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of continued abuse and neglect if abuse policy is not properly implemented. Findings included: Record review of Resident #51's face sheet dated 04/16/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified fracture of the right femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(a disease that makes it hard to breath and causes lung deterioration, morbid obesity, fall from non-moving wheelchair, and osteoarthritis (arthritis of the bones which causes widespread generalized pain.)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, or serious bodily injuries were reported immediately but not later than 24 hours after the allegation was made for one (Resident #51) of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report to the State Agency an incident on 01/17/25 where Resident #51 fell out of the shower chair while transporting back to his room and sustained a fracture to the right femur. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of abuse and neglect. Findings included: Review of Resident #51's face sheet dated 04/16/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified fracture of the right femur fall from non-moving wheelchair, and osteoarthritis (arthritis of the bones which causes widespread generalized pain.) Review of Resident #51's MDS updated March 2, 2025 indicated he needed extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's RP when there was a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) reviewed for change in condition. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's RP was notified when his medication Ativan (anxiety) was discontinued by the Doctor on 02/24/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of their responsible party not being involved in the communication of medication no longer being taken by the resident. Findings included: A record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/11/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses were anxiety disorder (feelings of worry and fear), major depressive disorder (sadness), and primary hypertension (abnormal high blood pressure). A record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/11/2025, reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 7, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. A record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0839 — patternEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable state laws for 4 of 7 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure Med Tech M had a current and active license. Med Tech M provided medications to Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4 while her Med Tech license was expired from [DATE] through [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care and/or services. Findings include : 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated [DATE], reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included heart failure (heart does not pump as well as it should), diabetes (body have trouble controlling blood sugar energy) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 14, which indicated intact cognition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the state Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities, in accordance with State law through established procedures for one of seven residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect . The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an incident when Resident #1's Advanced Directive was not followed, and CPR was not administered to Resident # 1. Resident #1 expired on [DATE] at the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse or and neglect. Findings include:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 7 residents (Residents #2) reviewed for medications and pharmacy services The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received his hospital ordered medications when it was not documented whether Levofloxacin (a medication used for treating infections) and Metronidazole (a medication to treat various infections) were ordered when Resident # 2 discharged from the hospital to the facility on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medication or care to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, printed on 02/28/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop policies and procedures to ensure each resident was offered an influenza immunization October 1 through March 31 annually, unless the immunization was medically contraindicated or the resident had already been immunized during this time period and before offering the pneumococcal immunization, each resident was offered a pneumococcal immunization, unless the immunization was medically contraindicated or the resident had already been immunized for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #3 Resident #4) reviewed for immunizations . The facility failed to document the flu vaccine for Resident #3 and Resident #4 which resulted in double flu vaccinations. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary medical care and hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 03/01/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-08 · tag F0620 — patternNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an admissions policy that did not request or require residents to waive potential facility liability for loss of personal property for three (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for inventory of personal property. The facility to have a completed inventory of personal property lists for Residents #1, #2, and #3. This failure could place residents at risk of not having personal property replaced in the event of damage or loss. Findings included: Review of the facility's undated admission packet reflected the following: 21. PERSONAL BELONGINGS. Resident/Resident Representative shall complete and sign Facility's written inventory form listing Resident's personal belongings at the time of admission. An original inventory shall be retained by Resident/Resident Representative as a receipt and a copy will be kept with the Resident's records . Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one of one medication room reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the medication room was kept locked or under direct supervision of authorized staff on 10/08/24. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized staff having access to their medications, and accessing and ingesting medications that could cause clinically significant adverse consequences necessitating hospitalization to stabilize residents,. Findings included: An observation of the medication room on 10/08/24 at 11:10 a.m. revealed the medication room door was unlocked. There was no staff directly supervising the unlocked medication room. Residents were rolling their wheelchairs passed the unlocked medication room. During an interview on 10/08/24 at 11:12 a.m., when asked why the medication room was unlocked, the ADON stated there was a nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one resident (Resident #1) out of five residents reviewed for the development of the comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a comprehensive person-centered care plan. This deficient practice places the resident at risk for not receiving the necessary and appropriate care. Findings included: A record review on 08/21/2024 of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/12/2024 reflected admission to the facility on [DATE]. She is a [AGE] year-old male. The residents' diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (an irreversible brain disease that destroys memory, thinking and the ability to carry out daily activities), polyarthritis (refers to a joint disease that involves at least 5 joints, inflammation, pain, movement restriction, warmth, swelling and redness can occur) and dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions such as memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological's were in locked compartments and inaccessible to unauthorized staff, visitors, and residents for one (Med Cart #1) of six medication carts reviewed for medication storage in that: The MA failed to lock and secure Med Cart #1. This failure could allow residents, visitors and unauthorized staff access to prescription and over-the-counter medications. Findings Included: Observation on 08/21/2024 at 9:04 am revealed, Med Cart #1, sitting in the hallway near nurses' station, was unsupervised and unlocked. Review of the cart's contents revealed prescription and over-the counter medications and ointments, glucometer supplies, insulin pens, and insulin syringes. The MA assigned to the cart was not within eyesight. Another staff member shouted the MA's name down the hall and quickly locked the cart. There were numerous staff and residents in the hallway around the nurse's station. In an interview on 8/21/2024 at 4:00 PM with the MA, she stated she had worked at the facility for ten years and the most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one resident (Resident #1) out of five residents reviewed for the development of the comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a comprehensive person-centered care plan. This deficient practice places the resident at risk for not receiving the necessary and appropriate care. Findings included: A record review on 08/21/2024 of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/12/2024 reflected admission to the facility on [DATE]. She is a [AGE] year-old male. The residents' diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (an irreversible brain disease that destroys memory, thinking and the ability to carry out daily activities), polyarthritis (refers to a joint disease that involves at least 5 joints, inflammation, pain, movement restriction, warmth, swelling and redness can occur) and dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions such as memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs for one resident (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan was completed upon admission and revised or updated to reflect changes in Resident #1's care needs for falls, medications (antibiotics, anti-hypertensive, anti-depressant), Cognition. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met in a timely manner and communicated to providers and could result in a decline in physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet date 07/19/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder (mental health disorder having episodes of psychological depression,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for of five residents three (Resident #2, Resident #3 and Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide showers to Residents #2, #3 and #4 in compliance with their shower schedules. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a decline in hygiene, at risk of skin breakdown, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #2's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included unspecified intellectual disabilities, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and difficulty in walking. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/20/24, reflected a BIMS of 14, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for mobility . The facility failed to apply a hand contracture cushion to Resident #1's contracted hand. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest practicable well-being. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia , generalized muscle weakness, and osteoarthritis (a type of generative joint disease). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/19/24, reflected a BIMS could not be conducted due to her rarely/never being understood. Record review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 (500 hall cart and 100 hall cart) of 4 medication carts, 1 (500 hall linen cart) of 3 linen carts, and 2 (Resident #5 and Resident #6) of 5 residents reviewed for medication storage. 1) The facility failed to ensure a medication cup, with 3 types of unidentified cream, was not left unattended on a linen cart . 2) The facility failed to ensure a bottle of medicated shampoo and two tubes of a wound care cream were stored in a secure place. 3) The facility failed to ensure a medication cup, with 3 types of unidentified cream, was not left unattended at Resident #5's bedside. 4) The facility failed to ensure eyedrops were not left at Resident # 6's bedside. These failures could place residents at risk for misappropriation of medications, misuse of medications, and potential side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received regular showers. These failures placed resident at risk of poor personal hygiene. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet for Resident #1 dated 4/4/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Legal Blindness, as defined by USA, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Unspecified Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Pain in Unspecified Joint, Morbid (Severe) Obesity, Unspecified Osteoarthritis, Unspecified, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Mixed Hyperlipidemia, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease, Cardiomyopathy, Unspecified, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Weakness, Muscle Weakness Generalized, Unspecified lack…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible in 2 of 6 resident hallways (Hall 1 and secured hall 6). The facility failed to keep the linen carts free of items that could be dangerous to residents. This failure could result in residents experiencing accidents, injuries, loss of dignity , and diminished quality of life. Findings included: On 4/3/2024 at 10:40am during walk through observation of secured Hall 6, the linen cart contained a non-aerosol MedLine odor eliminator spray, a tube of MedLine Remedy Antifungal Ointment, a tube of Coloplast Hydrophilic Wound Dressing, a bottle of MedLine Remedy Cleansing Foam, a tube of MedLine Soothe and Cool Barrier ointment, and an opened package of disposable razors. On 04/03/2024 at 10:55am, during interview with CNA, she stated the cart should only be stocked with linens and briefs. She said wipes, creams and razors should not be on the linen cart and it is the CNA's responsibility to check the cart when they start their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review; it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, for 3 of 19 residents reviewed for Resident rights (Resident #167, Resident #10, and Resident #19). Facility failed to provide dignity and respect for Resident #19 by providing privacy while transporting resident down the hall. Facility failed to provide dignity and respect for Resident #10 by providing privacy while incontinent care. Facility failed to respect Resident #167's rights;resident did not receive a bath before leaving facility to attend dialysis. The facility's failure could place residents at risk of not being treated with respect, dignity, and care in a manner that protects and promotes the rights of the residents. Findings include: Resident #19 Record review of Resident #19's clinical record revealed that Resident #19 was a [AGE] year-old man who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior and clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition for 10 of 23 (Resident #3, Resident #20, Resident #22, Resident #25, Resident #26, Resident #30, Resident #50, Resident #62, Resident #116 and Resident #167) residents reviewed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to regularly change the sheets of Residents #20, #22, #30, 50, #116 and #167. The facility failed to put a bottom sheet on Resident #25's bed. The facility failed to keep the floors of the facility clean. The facility failed to keep Resident #62's urinals clean and empty. The facility failed to keep the bathrooms of Residents #3 and #22 clean. The facility failed to provide Resident #26 with unstained towels for his shower. These failures could place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good personal and oral hygiene for 4 (Resident #20, Resident #167, Resident #35, and Resident #116) of 19 residents reviewed for ADLs. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20 received a shower regularly or changed her sheets. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #167 received a shower regularly. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34 received a shower regularly. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #116 received a shower regularly. These failures could place residents at risk of poor hygiene and grooming and thereby decrease their quality of life. Findings Included: 1. Record review of Resident #20's face sheet, dated 01/30/2024, revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, heart disease, localized edema, muscle weakness,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment for one of one facility reviewed for sufficient staff. The facility failed to have sufficient staff available to provide resident care. This failure could put residents at risk of not receiving necessary care to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings Included: Resident #16 Record review of Resident #16's admission record dated 01/31/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communication diseases and infections for 4 (Resident #10, Resident #5, Resident #1, and Resident #35) of 19 Residents in that: 1. CNA M did not perform hand hygiene before, after, or during incontinent care of Resident #10. 2. CNA N did not perform hand hygiene before, during, or after incontinent care of Resident # 5. 3. MA Q did not perform hand hygiene before or after administering ear drops to Resident #1. 4. MDS LVN did not perform hand hygiene before or after administering insulin injection to Resident #35. 5. Medication room did not have paper towels available to perform hand hygiene. These failures had the potential to affect residents in the facility by placing them at risk of contracting, spreading, and/or exposing them to bacterial or viral infections that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a significant change of condition assessment within 14 days of determining or should have determined that there had been a significant changed in a resident physical or mental condition for 1 (Resident #55) of 19 residents review for significant changes of condition. The facility failed to complete a significant change of condition MDS assessment when Resident #55 was admitted to hospice. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for not receiving correct care and services leading to deterioration in their condition. Finding include: Record review of Resident #55's face sheet dated 01/30/2024 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified axillary vein, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, malignant neoplasm of sigmoid colon, major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #49 and Resident #59) of 28 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. 1. Resident #49's MDS indicated she was rarely/never understood and able to answer a question about pain despite not being an active participant in the MDS process. 2. Resident #59 was discharged from the facility on 09/29/23 but did not have a discharge MDS in her EHR. This failure could place residents at risk of being inaccurately assessed and therefore not receiving necessary care. Findings Included: 1. Record review of Resident #49's admission record revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance (breakdown of thought process causing disruptive behavior), muscle weakness, senile degeneration of brain (a state of mental, emotional, and social deterioration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident #49 and Resident #55) of 19 residents reviewed for care plans. 1. Resident #49's care plan did not address pain or the pain medications she was prescribed. 2. Resident #55's care plan listed him as full code when he was DNR. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving desired and necessary care and treatment. Findings Included: 1. Record review of Resident #49's admission record revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents do not receive psychotropic drugs pursuant to a PRN order unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record and PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Except if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order for one (Resident #22) of 19 residents reviewed for PRN orders for psychotropic drugs. Resident #22 had two active PRN orders for the same anti-anxiety medication (Lorazapam) with order start dates of 12/12/23. Neither order had an end date. Resident #22 did not have a diagnosis of anxiety in her clinical record. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications with possible medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles 1. 20 loose pills were found in the Hall 100 medication cart. 2. 1 loose pill was found in the Hall 400 medication cart. These failures could result in residents not receiving doses of medication as well as not being maintained at their best therapeutic level. Findings include: Observation on 01/30/24 at 10:04 AM revealed Hall 100 medication cart had 20 lose pills in the bottom of medication cart drawer. LVN O could not identify pills. LVN O discarded medication into a Drug disposal solution and did not mention who to notify when medications are found lose. Interview on 01/30/24 at 10:16 AM revealed LVN O stated that a negative outcome of having lose pills in the bottom of the medication cart drawers would be that If we don't know who the pills belong to an inaccurate count of medication will be in the system. Then we might not be able to get a medication if we need it, because the pharmacy will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #116 FTag Initiation Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area, for 2 (Resident #116 and Resident #41) of 19 residents reviewed for call system functioning. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #116's call light button was functioning and within reach. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #41's call light was within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to call for assistance from staff. The findings included: Record review of Resident #116's clinical record revealed Resident #116 was a [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease, state 5, aftercare following joint replacement surgery, chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 meal . The facility failed to ensure the resident trays were not served cold. This failure placed residents at risk for of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. Findings include: An interview was conducted on 11/28/2022 at 10:20 AM with Resident #49. She had a complaint that the food was always served cold, and the eggs are rubbery when they get to her. An observation conducted on 11/28/2022 at 11:51 AM of the kitchen serving lunch trays. The regular lunch tray included a piece of fried chicken, okra, roasted potatoes, cornbread and a coffee cake and drinks included coffee, tea, or water. The [NAME] started to plate trays for residents who eat in their bedrooms. Serving container was not a heated container where the trays were being placed. Completed with trays at 12:10 PM and placed in dining room. They were left in the dining room area until 12:15 PM then the tray cart was taken out into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-30 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food that accommodates resident preferences for 2 of 2 (Resident #49 and #36) reviewed for food preferences. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's likes and dislikes were honored when serving her lunch tray on 11/28/22. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their choices and food preferences accommodated, possible weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's face sheet showed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had diagnoses of wedge compression fracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Her last weight was 92.6 pounds taken on 11/09/2022. An observation and interview conducted at 11/28/2022 at 3:18 PM, Resident #49 was sitting in bedroom and requested to talk with surveyor about lunch tray. Resident #49 informed surveyor with her lunch tray ticket which provided her meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure: - Raw chicken was not left out in kitchen. - Items not dated when opened. - Dented cans of food in regular pantry area. These failures could place residents at risk of food-borne illness and food that is contaminated or expired. Findings include: An observation conducted on 11/28/2022 at 09:35 AM, of the kitchen revealed, Raw chicken in a container open to air in the middle of the kitchen not covered. Hand wash station with cold water only and no paper towels. Dirty dishes laying on counter with cooling food and personal food items. Dented cans noted in the pantry area. Eggs wrapped with foil with no date on item. An observation conducted on 11/28/2022 at 11:35 AM, revealed a Milk container open with no open date on container. Personal drinking items located on puree counter area. An interview conducted on 11/28/2022 at 09:40 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to dispose of garbage properly for 2 of 2 (Dumpster #1 and #2) garbage dumpsters reviewed. The facility failed to ensure: Side door of Dumpster #1 was not left opened. 3 garbage bags were left on the floor next to the dumpster. These failures could result in providing harborage and breeding areas for insects, rodents and other pests which could infest the facility. Findings included: Observation on 11/28/22 at 4:18 PM, Dumpster #1's side door was left opened. 1 black garbage bag was left on the floor in the middle of both dumpsters and 2 white garbage bags were left on the floor on right side of Dumpster #2. During an interview on 11/30/2022 at 10:21 AM, the Dietary Manager said the process for trash disposal is the staff are aware the trash was to go inside the trash bin located outside. The DM said dietary was not the only department that throws out trash. She said that she would remind the dietary staff to throw trash inside the bin located outside. Interview on 11/30/22 at 04:25 PM, the DON stated nurses sometimes do throw…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 11 of 11 employees reviewed for infection control. A. The facility failed to ensure wash hands and dispose of dirty gloves while handling food. B. The facility could not provide flu consents for employees: CNA B, CNA C, LVN D,LVN E, CNA F, LVN G, CNA H, RN I, Med Aide J, Med Aide K, and Social worker. These failures could have placed residents at risk for food borne illness and influenza. Findings include: During an observation on 11/28/2022 at 11:38 AM, cook and dietary aide in kitchen area preparing for lunch services. [NAME] preparing and cooking raw chicken, no gloves worn while handing chicken. [NAME] washed hands after placing chicken in frying pot. Went to handle the items for the pureed tray. Placed items in the puree machine, food handled with no gloves. At 11:54 AM, the cook with gloves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-30 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on, interview and record review the facility failed to Include dementia management training for 6 of 7 nursing staff reviewed for dementia training. A. The facility could not provide dementia training for 6 of 7 nursing staff. This failure could have placed residents with dementia diagnosis at risk of not receiving proper dementia care. Findings included: Review of DON's Dementia training revealed completion date 11/30/22 and date of hire was 10/17/22. Review of CNA B Dementia training revealed completion date 11/30/22 and date of hire was 12/08/2020. Review of CNA C Dementia training revealed completion date 11/30/22 and date of hire was 9/2/22. Review of LVN D Dementia training revealed completion date 11/30/22 and date of hire was 11/16/22. Review of LVN E Dementia training revealed completion date 11/30/22 and date of hire was 8/5/22. Review of CNA F Dementia training revealed completion date 11/30/22 and date of hire was 11/25/22. Interview and record review on 11/30/22 at 3:00 PM, HR stated the facility was in the process of switching all files to electronic files. HR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-30 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 (Resident #47) of 2 residents reviewed for PASSAR in that: -Resident #47 was diagnosed with Schizophrenia after PASSAR Level I was completed and was not further evaluated for Level II. This failure could cause a decline in mental health by not receiving available services for residents not evaluated accurately. Findings included: Review of Resident #47's face sheet showed a [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had diagnoses of bipolar disorder (extreme mood swings) and depression. It also showed she was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder on 02/18/22. Review of History and Physical dated 02/09/22 confirmed Resident #47's diagnoses of depression and bipolar disorder. Review of Psychiatric note dated 11/11/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions and expiration date when applicable for 1 of 3 (500 hall) medication carts reviewed for expired medications in that: The facility failed to ensure the 500 hall medication cart did not contain expired medications, Centrum Adult Vitamin bottle had no open date and an expiration date of 2/22. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of decline in health if medication was to be administered to them. Findings included: Observations of the 500 hall medication cart on 11/29/22 at 10:35 AM, with RN A, revealed a bottle of Centrum Adult Vitamins opened with an expiration date of 2/22. In an interview on 11/29/22 at 10:42 AM, RN A said we are all mindful of our own medication carts and supplies. The staff checks their own cart. She said the medication should not have been in the cart because it was expired and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented for 1 (Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for physician's orders. A. Resident #2 had active physicians' orders for full code and do not resuscitate. This failure could place residents at risk for delayed treatment due to inaccurate documents that could result in harm or actual death. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 11/30/22 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #2's history and physical dated 10/12/22 revealed a diagnosis of benign brain tumor status post-surgical removal. Review of Resident #2's out of hospital do not resuscitate order dated 1/24/17 revealed Resident #2 and physician both signed on 1/24/17. Review of Resident #2's nursing facility to hospital transfer form dated 5/25/22 revealed code status- do not resuscitate. Review of Resident #2's care plan summary dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$86,207 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-04-12
- $42,563 — penalty dated 2025-03-03
- $35,363 — penalty dated 2024-03-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NEXION HEALTH — 51 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 50 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 50; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEXION HEALTH OF OHI INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/09/2020 |
| NEXION HEALTH LEASING, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/09/2020 |
| NEXION HEALTH, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/09/2020 |
| BOLT, BRETTON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2020 |
| KIRLEY, FRANCIS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2020 |
| MASSOODI, HOSHEM | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2020 |
| HERDRICH, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/01/2020 |
| LEE, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2020 |
| RINER, MEERA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $313K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455889. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.