No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

New Iberia Manor South

600 Bayard St, New Iberia, LA 70560 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (337) 365-3441 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (337) 365-3441 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 actual-harm citation$8,169 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,169 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-08)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
806 Jefferson Ter · (337) 365-4945 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1104 E Main St · (337) 365-8048 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
421 Fontelieu Dr · (337) 364-7769 · Call to confirm hours
Park
300 Parkview Dr · (337) 369-2337 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.6%17.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.7%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.2%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened45.4%17.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication39.7%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%5.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.6%15.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table38.9%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.2%3.1%1.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.3%76.3%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.1%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.1%14.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.222.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.272.741.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 44.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.6%CMS range 58.3–77.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.8%CMS range 9.5–17.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified15.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 4.0–13.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.12
RN hours/ resident / day
1.50
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
44.4%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 81.9 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.12 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.12 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-23)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-02-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse from other residents for 1 (#1) out of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) sampled residents. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from being bit by Resident #4. This deficient practice resulted in actual physical harm for Resident #1 on 12/23/2023 at 1:00 p.m. when S4CNA and S3LPN failed to protect Resident #1 from Resident #4 who was known to be verbally and physically aggressive. Both S4CNA and S3LPN observed Resident #4 in an agitated state when she kept repeating that Resident #1 had her baby. S4CNA and S3LPN allowed Resident #4 propel her wheelchair down the hallway towards Resident #1. Ten minutes later, S4CNA heard screaming down the hallway and observed Resident #4 hitting Resident #1 in the face while screaming she has my baby! Resident #4 hit Resident #1 multiple times in the face causing redness to her forehead, right eye, and cheek. Findings: A review of the Facility's Abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0742 — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to document behaviors of a resident diagnosed with mental disorders, to ensure the resident attained the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) out of 8 (#1- #8) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and dementia. Review of Resident #1's January 2026 Physician's Orders revealed the following in part: - busPIRone HCl (Hydrochloride) Oral Tablet 10 MG (milligrams) (Buspirone HCl)- Give 10 mg by mouth three times a day for anxiety. Ordered 12/09/2025 -OLANZapine Oral Tablet 5 MG (Olanzapine) Give 5 mg by mouth two times a day for dementia. Ordered 06/28/2025. -Venlafaxine HCl ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 75 mg- Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. Ordered 06/1/2024. - Behavior monitoring Anti-Psychotic Q Shift:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff provided services reflecting accepted standards of quality care as evidenced by medications being left at the bedside for 3 residents (#17, #84 and #90) out of a finalized sample of 36 residents. Resident #17:Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to history of falling and allergic rhinitis.Review of Resident #17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating the resident's cognitive function was intact.Review of physician's orders revealed an order written on 07/14/2025 for Zyrtec allergy oral tablet 10 mg (Cetirizine HCL [hydrochloride]) give 10 mg (milligrams) by mouth one time a day for allergic rhinitis.On 07/21/2025 at 10:38 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #17. An oval shaped white pill was observed on the resident's bed. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' environment remained free of accident hazards, by failing to lower and lock beds for 2 (#17 and #84) of 3 (#10, #17, and #84) residents investigated for accidents.On 07/23/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Prevention Program with a last review date of 06/18/2025, read in part.All residents will be assessed for the risk for falls at the time of admission, on a quarterly basis.Based on the results of this assessment, interventions will be implemented to minimize falls, avoid repeat falls and minimize falls resulting in significant injury. 3. The following is a list of commonly used interventions that may be considered to minimize falls and injury.c. Bed maintained in low position.Resident #17:Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to history of falling, fracture of left pubis, and aftercare following joint replacement surgery.Review of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for 1 (#37) of 1 (#37) resident investigated for dialysis.On 07/23/2025, a review of the facility's dialysis protocols with a reviewed date of 07/11/2025 read in part.2. Implement dialysis communication regarding plan of care. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #37's July 2025 Physician's orders revealed an order written on 06/30/2025 for Resident #37 to receive dialysis 3 days a week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at a dialysis provider center. Review of Resident #37's dialysis communication sheets between the facility and the dialysis provider revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served to residents that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 3 (#4, #7, #37) out 3 (#4, #7, #37) residents investigated for food out of a total sample of 36 residents1. Resident #4. On 07/21/2025 at 11:43 a.m., the resident stated that he did not like the way the food was prepared. On 07/22/2025 at 10:10 a.m. during the resident council meeting, the resident stated the food was served cold and the portion sizes were too small. 2. Resident #7. On 07/21/2025 at 12:47 p.m., the resident stated the food was not good, not seasoned, the meat was tough, and the portion sizes were for a child. On 07/22/2025 at 8:55 a.m., S14CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was observed picking up the resident's breakfast tray out of his room. On 07/22/2025 at 9:08 a.m., an interview was conducted with S14CNA. She stated the resident did not eat his meals because he did not like the food that was served. 3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service, and ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen as evidenced by: opened food items in the walk in cooler not labeled with the date and time; thick layer of debris and food residue on the deep fryer cooking oil collection area; andexposed facial hairThe facility had a census of 84 residents.Findings:On 07/21/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, with a last revision date of 06/23/2025, revealed in part. Policy Statement: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Policy Interpretation and Implementation:.8. All food stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated ( use by date).On 07/21/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Refrigerator and Freezer, with a last reviewed date of 06/25/2025, revealed in part.Policy Statement: This facility will ensure safe refrigerator and freezer maintenance, temperatures, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the grievances the resident group voiced in regards to the food that was being served were acted upon and resolved. Review of the monthly resident council meeting minutes dated from 01/13/2025 to 07/03/2025 revealed there were complaints that the food was cold, improperly cooked, and portion sizes were small. On 07/22/2025 at 10:10 a.m. during the resident council meeting, the residents in attendance stated the food issues were not addressed and was worse. The residents complained the food was served uncooked, cold, and the meat was tough. The residents in attendance were Resident #4, #11, #16, #39, #50, #66, #69, #85, #87, and #90. During the resident council meeting on 07/22/2025 at 10:10 a.m., S15AD (Activity Director) was present during the meeting per the residents' request. S15AD confirmed the complaints about the food had been ongoing since 01/13/2025 to present date.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that Resident #7's grievance was reported and investigated for 1 (#7) out of 36 sampled residents. Resident #7. On 07/21/2025 at 12:41 p.m., the resident stated that about 6 months ago when he was admitted to the facility his wallet was stolen. The resident stated that his wallet contained 350 dollars, driver's license and social security card. The resident stated he reported it to the administrative staff. The resident stated that no one has followed up with him concerning his stolen wallet. The resident stated that he does not know if there was an investigation.Review of the resident's general nurses notes dated 10/27/2024 at 11:30 a.m. revealed, Resident reported theft of a wallet (containing: bank card, social security card, driver's license, insurance card and $350.00 cash) and a pair of sunglasses. He says that this occurred the first week he got here . On 07/23/2025 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S16RN (Registered Nurse). S16RN stated she remembers the resident reporting to her that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement physician's orders by failing to change the dressing on a peripherally inserted central catheter site for 1(#56) of 5 (#9, #11, #43, #56, and #58) residents investigated for infections.Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, urinary tract infection, extended beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance, and enterococcus as the cause of diseases.Review of physician's orders revealed an order written on 07/11/2025 to change midline dressing following technique and apply BIO (round antimicrobial dressing used to prevent infections at catheter insertion sites) patch every day shift every Fri (Friday).On 07/21/2025 at 10:54 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #56. The resident had a midline catheter with an exit site on her left arm which was dated 07/11/2025. Further observation revealed a sign taped over the residents bed which read, midline was inserted 07/11/2025.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents received all care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to inform the resident's physician/nurse practitioner that resident (#4), who has a diagnosis of Heart Failure, was having difficulty breathing and had a low O2 sat (oxygen saturation- the amount of oxygen circulating in blood) reading of 88% for 1 (#4) out of 4 (#4, #7, #13, #92) residents investigated for hospitalizations out of a total sample of 36 residents.Resident #4. Review of the resident's electronic clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, Heart Disease, Heart Failure, Hepatitis C, and Diabetes. Review of the resident's significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 06/12/2025 revealed the resident's BIMS score was 14 for being cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary and homelike environment for 1 (#9) out of 36 sampled residents.Resident #9. On 07/21/2025 at 10:23 a.m., the resident was observed siting up in bed in his room. During this observation, a suction canister was observed on the resident's dresser. There was drainage noted in the canister. The resident stated that the suction canister had been on the dresser for days. On 07/21/2025 at 10:24 am, S17LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) entered the room and observed the canister on the dresser. S17LPN stated she did not know how long the canister had been on the dresser and that it should have been discarded. On 07/23/2025 at 10:33 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing). S2DON stated the facility did not have a policy and procedure on suction equipment but stated the canister should have been changed out.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents right to be free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, for 1 (#2) of three (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by Resident #2's use of a wheelchair seat belt the resident was unable to remove. Findings: On 04/30/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled Facility Policy on PSDs (Personal Safety Devices) -Enablers-Side Rails & Restraints with a last revised date of 02/2025, read in part .Restraint Policy Intent: Patients/Residents have the right to be free from any physical restraint imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and when not required to treat the patient's/resident's medical condition. Patients/Residents have the right to function at their highest practicable level in the least restrictive environment possible. Policy: 1. Restraints will not be used unless the facility's Interdisciplinary Team has completed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the State Long Term care Ombudsman of a facility-initiated transfer for 1 (#3) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents sampled. Findings: A review of Resident #3's admission record revealed an initial admission date of 08/29/2024 and a re-admission date of 04/15/2025 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, End Stage Renal Disease and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. A review of Resident #3's nurse's notes revealed on 03/30/2025 at 11:45 a.m., the resident was transferred to the hospital. Further review of the nurse's notes revealed that on 04/15/2025 the resident returned from the hospital back to the facility. A review of the Emergency Transfer Log for March 2025 and April 2025 revealed Resident #3's transfer to the hospital on [DATE] was not identified on the list. On 04/30/2025 at 1:49 p.m., an interview and record review were conducted with S5SSD (Social Service Director). S5SSD stated she is responsible for completing and sending the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an assessment and ongoing communication with the dialysis facility by using dialysis communication forms for 1 (#3) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents sampled. Findings: A review of the facility's agreement with the Contracted Dialysis Agency with an effective date of 02/15/2019 read in part, Responsibilities of Long Term Care Facility (LTCF): LTCF healthcare staff will make an assessment of each patient's physical condition and determine whether the patient is stable enough to be dialyzed on an outpatient basis . This assessment and communication will occur prior to each and every transfer of a patient to the contracted dialysis agency for hemodialysis on an outpatient basis regardless of the number of time any particular patient may be transferred and dialyzed . A review of Resident #3's admission record revealed a re-admission date of 04/15/2025 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, End Stage Renal Disease and Dependence on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a yearly performance review was completed on every Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) for 1 (S8CNA) of 4 (S8CNA - S11CNA) CNAs personnel records reviewed. Findings: During an interview with S8CNA on 04/29/2025 at 5:25 a.m., the CNA stated she had not received a performance evaluation since she started working at the facility. Review of S8CNA's personnel records revealed a Personnel Action Form with a hire date of 06/06/2023. Further review of the CNA's personnel records revealed no performance evaluation. During an interview with S2DON (Director of Nursing) on 04/30/2025 at 12:04 p.m., she stated that S8CNA is a PRN (as needed) staff and had not received a performance evaluation because she did not receive raises. During an interview with S1ADM (Administrator) on 04/30/2025 at 3:55 p.m., she stated that she was not aware that performance evaluations were required for PRN staff.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents complaining of pain for 1 (Resident #3) out of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. This had the potential to affect the 82 residents that resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/25/2025 a review of the facility's policy titled, Pain Management Program Policy, with a revised and reviewed dated of 01/2025 read in part . The facility will ensure that residents receive the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan and the resident's choices, related to pain management. If pain is identified, the following steps are initiated:-Created a Pain Care Plan using standardized pain assessment tools, obtain orders for pharmaceutical and/or non pharmaceutical interventions. Nurses will assess residents' pain every shift using the appropriate pain evaluation tool and document the effectiveness of interventions. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was available for 1 (Resident #3) out of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. This had the potential to affect the 82 residents that resided in the facility. Findings: Review of Resident #3's electronic clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: atrial septal defect as current complication following acute myocardial infarction, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system, presence of aortocoronary bypass graft (CABG), spastic cerebral palsy, paraplegia, spastic hemiplegia, chronic systolic congestive heart failure and dysarthria following cerebrovascular disease. Review of Resident #3's March 2025 physician's orders revealed an order dated 03/11/2025 for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325 mg (milligrams) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's comprehensive plan of care was implemented for 2 (#1, #3) residents out of 6 (#1-#6) sampled residents. The facility failed to: 1. Monitor a hematoma and perform wound care for a laceration as ordered for Resident #1; and 2. Perform wound care as ordered for Resident #3's surgical incisions. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's electronic health record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Cerebral Infarction, End Stage Renal Disease, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, Diabetes Mellitus, Severe Protein Malnutrition, and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. Review of Resident #1's October 2024 physician's orders revealed the following orders dated 10/18/2024: Monitor Hematoma to Left Eye daily for changes every day shift for Hematoma from fall; Wound #4-Laceration to Left Eye: Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry and leave open to air daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent and treat pressure ulcers for 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) residents of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) sampled residents investigated for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to provide wound care as ordered by the physician for Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 and Resident #5; and monitor proper functioning of a low air loss mattress for Resident #1 per the resident's plan of care. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's electronic health record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Cerebral Infarction, End Stage Renal Disease, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, Diabetes Mellitus, Severe Protein Malnutrition and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. October 2024 Review of Resident #1's October 2024 physician's orders revealed the following orders dated 10/07/2024: -Wound #1 Pressure Injury to the Left Ankle: Apply Gentian [NAME] daily every day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-23 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post daily nursing staffing that included the facility name, date, census, and the total number and actual hours worked by staff responsible for resident care in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings: On 07/22/2024 at 3:30 p.m., an observation was made throughout the entire facility, and there was no evidence that the daily nursing staffing was posted. On 07/22/2024 at 4:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S6Corp (Corporate Nurse) who confirmed that the census should be posted daily. She stated that staff had been posting it on Hall B. At that time, an observation was conducted with S6Corp on Hall B. A white dry-eraser board was observed located under the TV against the back wall. A closer observation revealed that the board did not contain any information. S6Corp stated that the board should have the census, the number of staff, and the total number and actual hours worked. She also confirmed that the board was not and should have been in an area where it was visible for all residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that menus were followed for residents. This had the potential to affect a census of 80 residents. Findings: On 07/21/2024 at 12:05 p.m., an observation was made of the meal service during lunch. The residents were served [NAME] Pilaf, Glazed Ham, Baked beans, Pureed Ham, Chopped Ham, [NAME] Mashed Potatoes, Pork Chops with Gravy, Pureed [NAME] Beans, Dinner Rolls, and Lemon Cake. There was no pureed dinner rolls or cornbread available. Review of the facility's lunch menu revealed the residents should have received: Glazed Ham, Baked sweet potato, Braised cabbage, Cornbread, and Frosted cake. On 07/21/2024 at 1:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5Cook. She confirmed there was a difference in what was served from the scheduled menu. S5Cook also confirmed that she did not prepare and serve pureed bread for residents receiving pureed meals. S5Cook stated she should have checked the menu. On 07/22/2024 at 2:08 p.m., an interview was conducted with S8RD (Registered Dietician) who stated the kitchen staff should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service and failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen by failing to: 1. Clean the kitchen fryer, fryer baskets, floor beside fryer and oven; 2. Label refrigerated foods and discard expired foods in the refrigerator; 3. Monitor refrigerator and freezer temperatures; 4. Monitor dishwasher temperature and chemicals; and 5. Ensure staff wore hair restraints in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 80 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings: On 07/22/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Sanitization with a revision date of 01/2024, read in part, Policy Statement: The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .1. All kitchens, kitchen areas and dining areas shall be kept clean .11 B. Fixed Equipment .1. Fixed equipment will be routinely cleaned and maintained .3. Food contact equipment will be cleaned and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-23 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results of the facility were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. The facility's census was 80. Findings: On 07/21/2024 at 10:23 a.m., an observation was made of a clear plastic file holder mounted to the wall outside of the human resources office door near the facility's main entrance. A clear colored binder containing licensing surveys was observed inside the plastic file holder, and inside the binder were survey results and plan of corrections from the annual surveys and complaints conducted in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021. There was no evidence of the last three year's of annual or complaint surveys in the folder. On 07/23/2024 at 12:44 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON (Director of Nursing) and S11Adm (Administrator). They stated the results for the survey were posted at the entrance of the nursing home in a clear binder holder outside of the human resources office, but nowhere else. S11Adm confirmed the annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care for each resident as evidenced by: 1. failing to follow the plan of care to address Resident #33's elevated blood sugar; and 2. failing to ensure Resident #1 had enabler bars attached to the bed as ordered. Findings: 1. Resident #33. Review of the resident's electronic clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Review of the resident's physician's orders dated revealed an order for Humulin R inject as per sliding scale 60-150 mg/dL (milligram per deciliter): 0 units, 151-200 mg/dL: 2 units, 201-250 mg/dL: 4 units, 251-300 mg/dL: 6 units, 301-350 mg/dL: 8 units, 351-400 mg/dL: 10 units, 401 mg/dL: 12 units, recheck blood sugar in 2 hours if still greater than 400 call the physician. Review of the resident's June 2024 MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-23 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that recipes were followed for 4 of 4 (#11, #34, #45, and #55) residents who received pureed diets, by failing to follow a recipe for mashed potatoes. Findings: On 07/22/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Therapeutic diets with a revision date of 06/12/2024, read in part, Policy Statement: Therapeutic diets are prescribed by the Attending Physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care .Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 4. A therapeutic diet is considered a diet ordered by a physician, practitioner or dietitian as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, to modify specific nutrients in the diet, or to alter the texture of a diet, for example .d. Altered consistency diet. A review of Resident #11's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and records reviewed the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program and implement accepted infection control practices to help prevent and control the spread of an infectious communicable disease, COVID-19, as evidenced by staff: 1. Failing to remove Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to exiting a positive COVID-19 room and perform hand hygiene upon removing PPE; and 2. Failing to ensure housekeeping staff used gloves and performed hand hygiene while handling a dirty mop. Findings: On 07/22/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program with a revision date of 01/01/2024, read in part, Policy Statement: An infection prevention and control program (IPCP) is established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .11. Prevention of Infection a. important facets of infection prevention include: 3. educating staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity by failing to provide a covering for a urinary catheter bag for 1 resident (#428) out of 35 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #428's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Kidney Disease and Heart Failure. On 07/21/2024 at 9:00 a.m., an interview and observation was made of Resident #428 with S12RNS (Register Nurse Supervisor). Resident #428's urinary catheter drainage bag was observed containing urine and there was no covering for the drainage bag. S12RNS confirmed that the catheter bag did not have a privacy cover. She was unsure of the policy on covering catheter drainage bags, but stated that she thought the bag should be covered. On 07/23/2024 at 11:42 a.m., an interview with S6Corp was conducted. She confirmed that a privacy cover should have been placed on Resident 428's urinary drainage bag.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by failing to ensure clean bed linen was provided to 1 (#23) out of 2 (#23 and #33) residents investigated for a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The final sample size was 35 residents. Findings: On 07/22/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment with a last reviewed date of 07/08/2024, read in part .The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include .e. clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition. Review of Resident #23's electronic health record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Cerebral Infarction, Muscle Weakness, Unspecified Lack of Coordination and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. On 07/21/2024 at 11:04 a.m., an observation was made of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's EMR revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was diagnosed with Schizophrenia on 01/22/2018. Further review of Resident #1's EMR (electronic medical record) revealed a Level 1 PASARR screening dated 05/07/2018 that was completed at another facility. Section 3 titled Mental Illness, was checked yes, and only Major Depression Disorder was checked. On 07/22/2024 at 1:13p.m., an interview was conducted with S6Corp. She stated Resident #1 was diagnosed with Schizophrenia on 01/22/2018. S6Corp confirmed the Level 1 PASARR screening was not answered correctly because Schizophrenia was not checked. She confirmed no other PASARRs were found and was unable to confirm a corrected submission was sent. Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level 1 screening was completed accurately for 2 (#1, #43) out of 2 (#1, #43) residents investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 35 residents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff demonstrated specific competencies and skill sets necessary to provide care to meet the residents' needs safely to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 1 (#428) of 35 sampled residents. This was evidenced by S18LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) leaving Resident #428's medication at the bedside. Findings: On 07/08/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, with a review date of July 8, 2024, revealed in part .27. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Resident #428 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Chronic Kidney Disease and Heart Failure. Review of the resident's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) performed on 07/18/2024 revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that were in order and accounted for the drug record reconciliation of all controlled drugs during shift changes for 1(Medicine Cart 1) MC1 of 3 Medicine carts reviewed during their annual survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 80 residents residing in the facility. On 07/23/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substances, with a review date of July 8, 2024, revealed in part .4. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty make the count together and document and report any discrepancies to the director of nursing services. On 07/22/2024 at 09:09 a.m., an interview and review of the July 2024 Controlled Drugs-Count Record for MC1 was conducted with S19LPN (Licensed Practice Nurse) and S20ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing). Both S19LPN and S20ADON stated that the off going nurse for each shift should have reconciled the narcotics in each medicine cart with the oncoming nurse. Both S19LPN and S20ADON confirmed that there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly store drugs as evidenced by 1. Loose pills found in the bottom drawers of 1(MC2 (Medicine Cart 2) out of 3 medication carts reviewed. 2. Failure to label a multi-use vial found in 1(MS1) out of 2 medicine storage rooms reviewed This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 80 residents residing in the facility. Findings: On 07/23/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, with a review date of 07/08/2024, revealed, in part, the following: Policy Statement: The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner .3. Nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. On 07/22/2024 at 9:57 a.m., an interview along with an observation of MS1 (Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER], 100 hall) was conducted with S22LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). A multi-use vial of flu vaccine was observed open, with no labeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident was adequately supervised and monitored while exiting off the transportation van's wheelchair ramp resulting in the residents sustaining injuries for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents sampled for accidents. Findings: The facility did not have a policy or procedure for unloading residents from the facility's van wheelchair ramp. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to Bipolar, Depression, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 04/05/2024 revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's incident report dated 06/10/2024, written by S6LPN (License Practical Nurse), read in part resident was lowered to the ground on ramp on van outside after returning from a doctor's appointment. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 1 resident (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. Findings: On 06/25/2024 , a review of the facility's policy titled Quality of Life- Dignity with a last revised date of February 2020 read in part .1. Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times .7. Staff speak respectfully to residents at all times . Review of Resident #1's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Other Post Procedural Complications of Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue, Encounter for Attention to Colostomy, and Anxiety. Review of section C- Cognitive Patterns of Resident #1's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating that her cognition was intact. Review of a facility investigation revealed that on 05/23/2024, Resident #1 gave the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to notify the Physician and Responsible Party, immediately after an accident involving the resident for 1(#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 82 residents residing at the facility. Findings: On 03/26/2024 at 1:30 p.m., a review of the facility's policy titled Policy for Resident Incident and Visitor Accident Report with a review date of 01/2023, revealed in part: Policy. The facility will conduct an investigation of all incidents involving residents of the facility .B. Resident Incidents/Accidents: 1. If you witness an incident/accident, you must .2. Licensed nurse must .e. notify the physician, family, legal representative. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Left Femoral Vein, Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Repeated Falls. On 03/21/2024, a review of a health standards intake form of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a person centered care plan for 2(#1, #2) of 3(#1, #2, #3) sampled residents, by failing to ensure the residents received nutritional supplement as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 27 residents who were ordered nutritional supplements. Findings: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Left Femoral Vein, Unspecified Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Repeated Falls. A review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed an order written on 02/22/2024 at 12:06 p.m. for Ensure Plus before meals for Anorexia/Malnutrition. On 03/26/2024 at 9:17 a.m., an interview and observation of the rehab unit refrigerator was conducted with S2LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). She stated that supplements were kept in the refrigerator. An observation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews the facility failed to provide accurate documentation that the resident's nutritional supplement was offered for 1 (#3) out of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the 82 residents that resided in the nursing home. Findings: Review of Resident #3's admission record revealed she was admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included in part, Cerebral ischemia, Dementia, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, right upper arm, right and left shoulder, Pressure ulcer of sacral region-Stage 3, Pressure-induced deep tissue damage of left heel and Vitamin D deficiency. Review of the resident's order summary report of active orders as of 03/01/2024 revealed an order with an order date 02/14/2024 for staff to encourage intake of supplements brought by family in resident's room every shift. On 03/26/2024 at 9:50 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S5LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). S5LPN was asked if she was aware that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service and failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen by failing to: 1. Remove expired food item from the refrigerator; 2. Label food items with the date and time they were opened; 3. Label cooked items with the date they were cooked; 4. Appropriately label food items taken out of original containers; 5. Remove dust buildup from the kitchen ceiling; 6. Remove dust from the refrigerator blower; and 7. Maintain kitchen equipment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 83 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 89. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Refrigerators and Freezers read in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation .7. All food shall be appropriately dated to ensure proper rotation by expiration dates .Use by dates will be completed with expiration dates on all prepared food in refrigerators. Expiration dates on unopened food will be observed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure hand hygiene was performed between distributing each resident's meal tray for 3 (#197, #198, #199) residents out of a final sample of 55 residents and ; 2. Failing to provide a lidded container to dispose used PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) used for a resident on Contact Precautions out of a final sample of 55 residents. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing - Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedures, read in part .7. Use an alcohol based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or alternatively soap (antimicrobial or non - antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: .b. before and after direct contact with residents. l. After contact with objects (e.g., medical equipment) in the immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the easy touch call light device was within reach for 1 (#71) investigated for accommodation of needs in a final sample of 55 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Answering The Call Light revealed, in part the following: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's request and needs. Steps in the Procedure: . 11. Place the call light within reach of the resident. Review of Resident #71's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Palsy, Epilepsy, Scoliosis, and Fusion of Spine. Review of Resident #71's comprehensive care plan dated 09/22/2021 revealed in part that the resident had an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit related to Cerebral Palsy with an intervention to keep call light within reach. On 08/28/2023 at 10:00 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #71 in bed. The resident's easy touch call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment by failing to clean the wall which had a dried brown and red splattered substance in Room A. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Homelike Environment revealed, in part, the following: Policy Statement: Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment . Policy Interpretation and Implementation .2. The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: a. Clean, sanitary and orderly environment . Review of the facility's form titled, Housekeeping Job Routine revealed, in part, the following: complete this shift checklist daily . 6- Spot clean walls . Review of the Housekeeping Job Routine for Room A revealed all areas for the forms dated 08/25/2023 to 08/29/2022 were checked off as completed. Review of the Housekeeper Job Description revealed, in part, the following: Job Function: Clean walls . On 08/28/2023 at 8:47 a.m., an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a Significant Change in Condition MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed for 2 residents (#82, #83) out of a total sample of 55 residents. Findings: Resident #82 Review of the facility's policy tiled MDS Coding Policy read: Nexion affiliated facilities utilize the most up to date resident assessment instrument (RAI) manual for determination of coding each section of the Resident Assessment, timely and accurately. Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Non-Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Brain Stem, Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes Mellitus, and Dysphagia. Review of Resident #82's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed a Significant Change MDS Assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 08/16/2023 that was in progress. Further review of the Significant Change MDS Assessment revealed section G was not completed. On 08/29/2023 at 11:00 a.m., an in interview was conducted with S17BOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's dialysis status for 1 (#83) out of 55 sampled residents. Findings: A review of Resident #83's medical record revealed that he had diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Disease and Dependence on Renal Dialysis with an onset date of 06/29/2023. A further review of the medical record revealed Resident #83 received dialysis on 07/01/2023. A review of Resident #83's medical record revealed a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/02/2023. Section I for Active Diagnoses included in part: I1500. Renal Insufficiency, Renal Failure, or End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and I800 Dependence on Renal Dialysis. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed under Section O0100-J (Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs) the box for Dialysis While a Resident was not checked. On 08/29/23 at 2:52 p.m., an interview and a review of Resident #83's 07/02/2023 MDS was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 resident (#82) out of 1 resident investigated for hospice services. This deficient practice occurred when the facility failed to collaborate with the hospice provider to obtain discharge orders at the time the resident was discharged from hospice care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Hospice Program read in part: In general, it is the responsibility of the hospice to manage the resident's care as it relates to the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: b. changing the level of services provided when it is deemed appropriate .10. In general , it is the responsibility of the facility to meet the resident's personal care and nursing needs in coordination with the hospice representative., and ensure that the level of care provided is appropriately based on the individual resident's needs. These…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were transcribed and followed for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Scalp Contusion Status Post Fall, Acquired Absence Of Right Leg Below Knee, Acquired Absence Of Left Leg Above Knee, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Atrial Fibrillation. Review of Resident #2's Q (Quarterly) MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating his cognition was moderately impaired. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] at 3:15 p.m., revealed, in part, the following: Physician order Hold Eliquis for 48 hours. Review of Resident #2's July 2023 EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) revealed the following Eliquis Oral Tablet 5 mg (milligram)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,169 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $8,169 — penalty dated 2024-02-08
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-06 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXION HEALTH — 51 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
The other 50 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bay Ridge Healthcare CenterLa Porte, TX 1 of 5Claiborne Healthcare CenterShreveport, LA 1 of 5Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCorinth, MS 1 of 5Crystal Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGreenwood, MS 1 of 5Duncanville Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterDuncanville, TX 1 of 5Flatonia Healthcare CenterFlatonia, TX 1 of 5Gonzales Healthcare CenterGonzales, LA 1 of 5Green Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Grenada Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGrenada, MS 1 of 5Holly Springs Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHolly Springs, MS 1 of 5Indianola Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterIndianola, MS 1 of 5Lily Springs Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterLampasas, TX 1 of 5Meadowview Health & Rehab CenterMinden, LA 1 of 5Patterson Healthcare CenterPatterson, LA 1 of 5Picayune Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPicayune, MS 1 of 5Pierremont Healthcare CenterShreveport, LA 1 of 5Prairie Meadows Rehabilitation and Healthcare CentFloresville, TX 1 of 5The Bluffs Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterVicksburg, MS 1 of 5Village Creek Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterLumberton, TX 1 of 5Willow Park Rehabilitation Health Care CenterClifton, TX 1 of 5Woodlands Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterClinton, MS 1 of 5Yazoo City Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterYazoo City, MS 2 of 5Great Oaks Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterByhalia, MS 2 of 5Kaplan Healthcare CenterKaplan, LA 2 of 5Many Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterMany, LA 2 of 5New Iberia Manor NorthNew Iberia, LA 2 of 5North Star Ranch Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenBonham, TX 2 of 5Willow Park Rehabilitation And Care CenterWillow Park, TX 3 of 5Barton Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterAustin, TX 3 of 5Cedar Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterPilot Point, TX 3 of 5Columbia Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterColumbia, MS 3 of 5Cross Timbers Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterFlower Mound, TX 3 of 5Delta Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCleveland, MS 3 of 5Golden Creek Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterNavasota, TX 3 of 5Lakeview Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterWinnsboro, TX 3 of 5Lone Star Ranch Rehabilitation and Healthcare CentKingsville, TX 3 of 5Midwestern Healthcare CenterWichita Falls, TX 3 of 5Natchez Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterNatchez, MS 3 of 5Ridgecrest Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterForney, TX 4 of 5Arbor Hills Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterEagle Lake, TX

Showing 40 of 50; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NEXION HEALTH OF OHI INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 12/31/2006
NEXION HEALTH LEASING, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/15/2002
NEXION HEALTH, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2002
BOLT, BRETTONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/15/2002
KIRLEY, FRANCISIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/15/2002
DOERR, KEVINIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2018
HERDRICH, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2012
REID, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/03/2018
RINER, MEERAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2012
LEE, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/15/2002

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$620K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 10%Other / private 24%

This home reported $620K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$313per resident / day
operating cost
$9,519per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$323per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195326. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next