Great Oaks Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 175 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 47.0 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.53 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident, staff, and family interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment and provide adequate supervision and equipment to prevent accidents for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1. Specifically, staff removed the resident's bed rails without a safety assessment and as a result, the resident rolled out of bed, during care and sustained a head laceration, suffered pain and required emergency room treatment, including x-rays and stitches. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Fall Prevention Program with a review date of 6/10/24 revealed under, Policy: All residents will be assessed for the risk for falls at the time of admission, on a quarterly basis, and upon significant change thereafter. Based on the results of this assessment, specific interventions will be implemented to minimize falls, avoid repeat falls and minimize falls resulting in significant injury. Record review of the NSG (Nursing): Device Evaluation dated 11/26/24 revealed under, Fall History . Fell…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and transmitted within CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) required time frames for one (1) of 14 MDS assessments reviewed. Resident #30.Findings Include:Record review of CMS Version 3.0 Manual revealed under Chapter 5, Submission and Correction of the MDS Assessments.5.2 Timeliness Criteria. For all non-admission OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) and PPS (Prospective Payment System) assessments, the MDS Completion Date must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD).For Entry and Death in Facility tracking records, the MDS Completion Date must be no later than 7 days from the Event Date.An interview with the Administrator on 5/19/26 at 10:21 AM revealed the facility did not have a policy regarding the timely encoding and transmission of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and stated staff followed the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual for guidance.Record review of Resident #30's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the provider to clarify missing orders for previously established interventions following a resident's return from the hospital. This resulted in a lapse in continuity of care for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for hospital readmission. Resident # 1.Findings Include: Record review of July 2025 Order Summary Report for Resident #1 revealed an abduction pillow, and nutritional supplement was ordered prior to hospital transfer on 8/15/25. Review of the After Visit Summary dated 8/18/2025 showed no mention of these interventions. Upon readmission, the facility did not contact the provider to clarify whether the interventions should be resumed, and the interventions were not reinstated. During an interview on11/6/25 at 8:15 AM, with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) she stated the facility only re-enters what the hospital sends back after clarification with the provider. She verified they did not seek clarification about pre-hospital interventions of the abduction pillow or nutritional supplement.In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency (SA) as required for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for injuries. Resident #1.Findings Include:Record review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition Policy revealed: The Abuse Coordinator will report such allegations to the state agency in accordance with the state law .The Abuse Coordinator will report .injuries of unknown source with serious bodily injury within two (2) hours of the allegation. Review of the facility's investigation, provided by the Administrator (ADM), revealed that on 5/28/25, Resident #1 experienced a syncopal episode and was transferred to the emergency room (ER). The Responsible Party (RP) later informed the facility that when Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transferred the resident from bed to stretcher on 5/28/25, the resident yelled out in pain and that EMS was not gentle. The investigation file included no documentation of staff witness statements, no record of conversation with the RP prior…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to conduct a prompt and thorough investigation of an injury of unknown origin to determine whether abuse, neglect, or a clinical cause contributed to the injury for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for injuries. Resident #1.Findings Included: Record review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition Policy revealed: Investigation: 1. The facility will thoroughly investigate all alleged violations and take appropriate actions. 5. Investigations will be prompt, comprehensive, and responsive to the situation and contain founded conclusions.Review of the facility's investigation, provided by the Administrator (ADM), revealed that on 5/28/25, Resident #1 experienced a syncopal episode and was transferred to the emergency room (ER). The Responsible Party (RP) later informed the facility that when Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transferred the resident from bed to stretcher on 5/28/25, the resident yelled out in pain and that EMS was not gentle. The investigation file included no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record was maintained when a verified exercise order was not entered into the electronic medical record, resulting in an incomplete clinical record for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed for medical record accuracy .Resident #1.Findings Included: Record review of a Return to Work/School form provided by the Orthopedic Physician's office for Resident #1 revealed and order, dated 7/18/25, for work on passive exercises for lower extremity due to patient non weight bearing status for 1-2 times a week. Work on active range of motion for upper extremity to ensure tone and minimalize stiffness for 1-2 times a week. The form was initialized and dated 7/22/25. Review of Resident #1's physician orders for July 2025 revealed no documentation that the new exercises were ordered. As a result, the services were not initiated as ordered. During an interview on 11/5/25 at 12:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the nurse practitioner (NP) verified the order for therapy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify a resident and/or a legal representative of the risks and benefits of using a psychotropic medication for four (4) of 42 residents reviewed for psychotropic drug use. Resident #8, #13, #21, and #23 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Psychotropic/Psychoactive Medication Policy with a revision date of 6/24/25 revealed under, Policy Implementation: . 5. All residents have full rights to participate or refuse treatment. Before initiating or increasing psychotropic medication the resident and or responsible party must be notified of and have the right to participate in their treatment, including the right to accept or decline the medication. The risk and benefits should be clearly explained . Resident #8 Record review of Resident #8's Order Summary Listing revealed the following orders: - Dated 3/06/25: Buspirone HCL (hydrochloride) oral tablet 5 MG (milligrams) give 1 (one) tablet by mouth three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a residents call light was accessible for one (1) of 50 residents in the facility. Resident #155 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Call System with a revision date of 3/28/23 revealed under, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor . An observation of Resident #155 on 6/23/25 at 9:26 AM revealed she was lying in bed with the call light on the floor under the bed. During an interview, Resident #155 voiced this happens often. She stated, The staff walk out and don't give me my call light, and I don't have any way to call them. She explained she prefers her room door left open so she can call out to staff if needed. An observation and interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 on 6/23/25 at 9:36 AM confirmed Resident #155's call light was on the floor. CNA #1 stated the call light…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a resident with a wheelchair in good repair for one (1) of 50 residents requiring a wheelchair in the facility. Resident #49 Findings Include: The facility provided a statement on letterhead that read, (Proper name of facility) does not have a policy specifically regarding wheelchair good repair/condition. During an observation of Resident #49 on 6/23/25 at 10:38 AM, he was propelling himself in his wheelchair down the hallway and into his room. Both arm rest were in disrepair, torn and tattered with the white foam visible and a silver screw head exposed on both sides. An observation and interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 on 6/24/25 at 7:55 AM confirmed Resident #49's wheelchair arm rest were in poor condition and stated he could get injured or scraped. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/24/25 at 9:10 AM revealed the wheelchair for Resident #49 was provided by the facility when he was admitted . She confirmed his chair should be in good repair and stated the resident could…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (1) of 16 residents' MDS reviewed (Resident #52). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, MDS Coding Policy, last reviewed 6/02/2025, revealed, Proper Name affiliated facilities utilize the most up to date Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for determination of coding each section of the Resident Assessment, timely, and accurately. Review of the Interdisciplinary Discharge Summary revealed Resident #52 was discharged to Proper Name Health and Rehab on 3/26/25. Review of the Admission/Discharge MDS for Resident #52 revealed Section A2105 - Discharge Status was coded 04 - Short-Term General Hospital. During an interview with the MDS nurse on 6/24/25 at 12:00 PM, she confirmed after review of the Admission/Discharge MDS that it was not accurately coded because Resident #52 was discharged to another rehabilitation facility and not to the hospital. She stated the purpose of accuracy of the MDS is to ensure there is an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment by not preventing hazardous substances from being stored in a resident's room, thereby creating the potential for accidental ingestion and harm. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent a resident's family from placing two homemade containers of ant bait (containing boric acid) in the resident ' s room, which remained accessible to Resident #15 and potentially to other cognitively impaired, wandering residents. This deficient practice affected one (1) of fifty (50) residents reviewed (Resident #15). Findings Include: Review of the typed statement on facility letterhead revealed the facility did not have a policy regarding storing hazardous materials in residents rooms and was signed by the Administrator. During an observation and interview in Resident #15's room on 6/23/25 at 12:00 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, she confirmed the presence of two (2) four-ounce, white, round, wide-mouth…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-05-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXION HEALTH — 51 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $488K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS