Prairie Meadows Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cent

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 59.8 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a residents' mental, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan that addressed Resident #1's wound on his left buttock identified as a stage 3 pressure ulcer (a bed sore which is an open wound that extends through the skin down into the fatty tissue, appearing as a deep crater but the bone, tendon or muscle are not exposed) by the Wound Care NP A on 11/20/2025 until 12/31/2025, 41 days later; did not address his refusals of skin assessments or wound care in the care plan and incorrectly listed the wound on his right buttock instead of his left. On 12/24/2025 maggots were observed in the stage 3 pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care, consistent with professional stands of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #95) reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. The facility failed to implement the Wound Care NP recommendations for 8 days when Resident #1 was identified with a stage 3 pressure injury to the left buttock from 11/20/2025 to 11/28/2025. Resident #1 refused wound care 22 times from 11/28/2025 to 12/24/2025, and refused further assessment of the wound from the Wound Care NP. On 12/24/2025, Resident #1 had maggots in his wound and the wound had increased in size from 4 cm x 5 cm x 0.2 cm on 12/10/2025 to 6 cm x 3.5 cm x 2 cm on 12/24/2025. An IJ situation was identified on 01/02/2026. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 09:13 PM. While the IJ was removed on 01/04/2026, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolation and severity level of no actual harm with potential for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that it was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pest control program. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not found with maggots in his left stage 3 buttock wound on 12/24/25. An IJ was identified on 1/1/26. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 1/1/26 at 8:25 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 1/3/26 at 7:24 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because the facility's need to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of its Plan of Removal. The failure could place residents with wounds at risk for infection or infestations from pests. The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that: The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents when Resident #1 was confused and required assistance to ambulate. A fall mat was not in place and the bed was not in a low position, and Resident #1 fell out of bed and sustained a left femoral neck hip fracture. An IJ was identified on 11/26/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:50 PM. While the IJ was removed on 11/27/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because the facility needed to monitor the implementation of the plan of removal. These failures placed the resident at risk for accidents and serious injuries. Findings included: Record review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for assessments: The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's Annual MDS dated [DATE] indicated she was PASRR positive. These failures could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments.Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 06/23/2026 revealed an admission date of 03/28/2024, with diagnoses that included: Epilepsy (condition that causes recurring seizures) , Insomnia (sleep disorder), Impulse disorder (psychiatric conditions characterized by an inability to resist urges or impulses), Intellectual disabilities (condition characterized by significant limitations in intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior), Hyperlipidemia (condition of high cholesterol or fats in the blood) and, anxiety disorder (worry that are difficult to control and interfere with day-to-day activities).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 17 residents (Residents #17) reviewed for infection control, in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA A sanitized his hands and changed gloves between residents and while providing incontinent care for Resident #17. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. Findings included: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 06/25/2026, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and, readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: Dysphagia (Difficulties swallowing), Dementia (Pattern of mental decline), Malignant neoplasm of brain (Brain cancer) and. Hypertension (High blood pressure), Record review of Resident #17's Quarterly MDS, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to accurately perform a head-to-toe-readmission assessment of Resident #1 on 12/11/25 and did not identify and assess a peripheral IV catheter located on the resident's chest until 12/14/25. This failure placed the resident at risk for complications including infection, infiltration (leakage of IV fluid or medication into the surrounding tissue instead of the vein, which can cause swelling, pain, and tissue damage), and dislodgement (movement or accidental removal of the IV catheter from the vein, which can cause bleeding, injury, or infection).Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 2/18/26, revealed an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #2, and Resident #4) reviewed for incontinent care: 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A wiped between Resident #2's labia folds during incontinent care. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's catheter bag was not touching the floor during incontinent care. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's catheter bag was not touching the floor. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices.1. Record Review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 2/20/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage (brain injury caused by lack of oxygen resulting in impaired neurological function), contracture of muscle, right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's medication administration report did not contain blanks. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of delayed or improper care due to inaccurate medical records.Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 2/18/26, revealed an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rhythm that can increase the risk of stroke and decreased cardiac efficiency), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition in which the body does not effectively use insulin, resulting in elevated blood glucose levels), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) (a digestive disorder in which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure personal privacy for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for privacy, in that: LVN J provided tracheostomy care for Resident #8 with the resident room door open, curtain separating A and B bed open and window blinds open. This failure could affect residents receiving tracheotomy care by resulting in loss of dignity and low self-esteem. The findings were: Record review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed Resident #8 was a [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage (complete lack of oxygen to the brain leading to brain damage), dementia (a general term for impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions) and tracheostomy status (surgical procedure that creates an opening through the neck into the windpipe that helps maintain an airway for a person who has difficulty breathing). Record review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for infection control in that: LVN J did not wear a gown when providing direct care to Resident #8 who had a tracheotomy and was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This failure could affect residents on enhanced barrier precautions and place them at risk for infection. The findings were: Record review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed Resident #8 was a [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage (complete lack of oxygen to the brain leading to brain damage), dementia (a general term for impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions) and tracheostomy status (surgical procedure that creates an opening…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure a case of cinnamon rolls was properly sealed in the reach-in freezer. 2. The facility failed to ensure the interior of the ice machine in the kitchen was free of dirt and debris. 3. The facility failed to ensure opened bags of graham cracker crumbs, cookie pieces, cake mix and frosting mix were sealed in the dry storage room [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility failed to ensure opened bag of snacks and cookies were sealed in the kitchen. 5. The facility failed to record the chemical sanitizing solution concentrations of the dish machine on the log sheet in the dish room. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Observation on 08/26/2025 at 10:44 AM revealed one 28-lb. case of mini cinnamon rolls in a chest freezer in the middle of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that for a resident with urinary incontinence, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility must ensure that a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 12 residents (Residents #49 and #52) reviewed for indwelling catheters and perineal/incontinent care, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's and Resident #52's indwelling catheter tubing were not attached to leg straps to prevent pulling or tugging on the urethra on 08/26/25. These failures could place residents at risk for discomfort, urethral trauma (injury to the duct in which urine is transported out of the body from the bladder), and urinary tract infections due to improper care. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #49's face sheet, dated 8/16/25, revealed an [AGE] year old male admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 3 the residents (Resident # 49) reviewed for oxygen in that: The facility failed on 8/26/2025to ensure that Resident #49's nebulizer tubing was bagged. This deficient practice could place residents who received oxygen therapy at risk for an increase in respiratory complications. The findings included: Record review of Resident #49's face sheet, dated 8/16/25, revealed an [AGE] year old male admitted to facility on 3/1/2025 with the diagnosis that included: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ( an enlarged prostate ), Type 2 diabetes ( is a chronic condition where your body either doesn't use insulin properly, leading to high blood sugar levels) and Pleural effusion,(is the buildup of excess fluid in the pleural space between the lungs and chest wall) Record review of Resident #49's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$33,059 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $19,432 — penalty dated 2026-01-04
• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-11-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXION HEALTH — 51 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX