Crystal Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 75.4 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment, physician notification, and initiation of appropriate treatment for an identified pressure ulcer to prevent further deterioration and promote healing for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident #1.Findings Include:Record review of facility policy The [Proper Name of Corporation] Skin Integrity Prevention and Treatment Program revealed .Weekly Skin Integrity Checks a. Weekly assessment looking for new wounds-completed by a licensed nurse; b.Document on/in Treatment Record; c. If new area found .Notify Medical Doctor (MD) -obtain treatment orders .Record review of a Progress Note dated 1/17/25 documented by Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN #1) revealed Resident #1 was noted with an open wound to the left upper extremity below the elbow with sanguineous drainage present. The note indicated first aid treatment was initiated and that the oncoming nurse and treatment nurse would be notified; however, there was no documentation to support that a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure there was an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program, as evidenced by repeat deficiencies for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) F677 over the last three annual surveys. Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, (Proper facility name) QAPI Program with no revision date revealed under the Purpose Statement .The purpose of Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee is to create a system for improving the care for our residents . An interview on 10/24/24 at 10:54 AM with the Corporate Nurse revealed the QAPI committee met with all department heads after the last survey in 6/2023, in 7/23 they met and went over anything that was trending based on the monitoring that was put into place after the survey that resulted in deficiencies and in 9/23, they went back to reviewing normal stuff. She stated that monitoring was supposed to have continued for the deficiencies from the last survey, but she is not sure that it did. She revealed that she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to inform staff and visitors of residents that were in Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) for six (6) of six (6) positive COVID-19 residents reviewed. Residents #6, #28, #29, #38, #81, and #84. Cross Reference F882 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, COVID-19 Policy and Procedures with a revision date of 9/15/23 revealed under, Training: Signage should be posted describing ways to prevent the spread of germs and protect against COVID-19 virus. This record review revealed under Core Principles of COVID-19 Infection Prevention .Instructional signage throughout the facility and proper visitor education on COVID-19 signs and symptoms, infection control precautions, and other applicable facility practices (e.g., use of face covering or mask, specified entries, exits and routes to designated areas, hand hygiene) and appropriate staff use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). An interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist fully implemented the Infection Control Program, as evidence by failure to ensure signage was applied to resident's rooms that were under Transmission-Based Precautions and complete surveillance for the current COVID-19 outbreak for one (1) of three (3) days of survey. Cross Reference F880 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, COVID-19 Policy and Procedures with a revision date of 9-15-23 revealed under, Training: Signage should be posted describing ways to prevent the spread of germs and protect against COVID-19 virus .Core Principles of COVID-19 Infection Prevention .Instructional signage throughout the facility and proper visitor education on COVID-19 signs and symptoms, infection control precautions, and other applicable facility practices (e.g., use of face covering or mask, specified entries, exits and routes to designated areas, hand hygiene) and appropriate staff use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan for a resident that was dependent on staff for nail care and shaving (Resident #11, #13, #47, #51) and failed to implement a care plan for a resident requiring a hand splint (Resident #62) for five (5) of 29 care plans reviewed. Findings Include A review of the facility policy titled, Care Pans, Comprehensive, Person-Centered, revealed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident ' s physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident . Resident #11 - Cross Reference F677, F687 Record review of the Care Plan for Resident #11 revealed I have Diabetes Mellitus . Interventions, Refer to podiatrist/foot care nurse to monitor/document foot care needs and to cut long nails .Diabetic Nail care weekly per nurse. During an observation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide personal hygiene for four (4) of 26 sampled residents as evidenced by failure to provide nail care (Resident #11, #13, #47, and #51) and shave a resident (Resident # 47). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Supporting with a revision date of March 2018 revealed, Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Resident #11- Cross Reference F687 An interview and observation on 10/22/24 at 10:05 AM with Resident #11 revealed the resident is non-verbal but indicated that she does not receive toenail care. The resident pulled off her left sock and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' dignity was not compromised as evidence by Multi Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) signs on resident's doors for 12 of 96 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights with a revision date of 1/11/24 revealed that .Resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside Facility. Facility must protect and promote the rights of each resident, including each of the following rights: 1. Exercise of Rights .c. Resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect for the personal integrity of the individual . An observation on 10/22/24 during initial tour of the resident doors in the facility revealed there were MDRO signs on the doors of the following rooms: 110, 111, 122, 125, 128, 132, 208, 215, 218, 223, 225, and 228. An interview and observation on 10/23/24 at 8:45 AM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff and resident interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNOC) was provided for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. Resident A and Resident B. Findings included: Review of the facility policy Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNOC) CMS-10123 revealed When to deliver the NOMNOC, A Medicare provider .must deliver a completed copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNOC) to beneficiaries/enrollees receiving covered skilled nursing .services. The NOMNOC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end . A completed Beneficiary Protection Notification Review was provided by the Business Office Manager (BOM) on 10/22/24 at 2:05 PM, that indicated Resident A had a Medicare Part A stay from 6/7/24 through 7/19/24, and Resident B had a Medicare Part A stay from 6/14/24 through 6/21/24, with no supporting documentation, such as a NOMNOC or Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN). An interview on 10/23/25 at 8:05…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to secure electronic health records as evidenced by an Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) visible while the medication cart was unattended on the East Short Wing medication cart for one (1) of three (3) medication carts. Resident #13 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights with a revision date of 1/11/24 revealed, 12 . Privacy and Confidentiality. Resident has the right to personal privacy and to confidentiality of his/her personal and clinical records. An observation on 10/23/24 at 8:05 AM, of a computer that was located on an unattended medication cart on the East Short Wing revealed the computer was opened with Resident #13's EMAR information visible on the screen and the screen was visible to anyone passing by the cart. The visible information included Resident #13's name, medications, and room number. An interview on 10/23/24 at 8:08 AM, Registered Nurse (RN)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary and comfortable resident environment, as evidenced by flies in residents room (Resident # 2 and Resident #7), dirty sheet and leaking air conditioning unit (Resident # 13), a dirty personal fan (Resident # 29) and a dirty floor and foul odor in resident's room (Resident # 86) for five (5) of 25 sampled residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Building Inspections undated, revealed under, Policy: Conduct routine building inspections on a monthly basis to identify potential problems and perform any required maintenance. Review of the facility policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment with a revision date of 3/23, revealed under, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: c . (3) . Disinfection is performed with an EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)-registered disinfectant labeled for use in healthcare settings. A review of a letter on company…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, facility policy review, and Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) review, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was coded accurately for four (4) of 26 sampled residents. Resident #13, # 47, 56, and #62. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, MDS Coding Policy with a revision date of January 4, 2023, revealed, Proper facility Name affiliated facilities utilize the most up to date Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for determination of coding each section of the Resident Assessment, timely and accurately. Resident #13 Record review of the MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/12/24 revealed that Resident #13 is taking an anticoagulant medication and was not taking an antiplatelet. Record review of the August 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that Resident #13 did not receive anticoagulant medications for the month of August but did receive Aspirin (ASA) An interview with the Registered Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-12-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXION HEALTH — 51 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $604K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS