Kaplan Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 113 beds and averages 72.5 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-11-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided nursing services and care that adhered to accepted standards of quality. Nursing staff failed to reconcile and administer the resident's prescribed anticoagulant medication for 39 days which jeopardized the resident's health and safety for 1 (#37) of 1 residents investigated for nursing services in a final sample of 31 residents. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #37 on 07/29/2024 when S3LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) failed to resume the resident's anticoagulant Eliquis 5 mg (milligrams) twice daily after undergoing a same-day scheduled procedure at HC1 (Hospital Center) to remove an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter. On 09/06/2024, the nurse observed Resident #37 confused and lethargic with swelling to the left lower extremity. Resident #37 was transferred via ambulance to Hospital A's emergency room (ER) for evaluation on 09/06/2024 at 3:52 p.m. Upon admit to the ER,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided according to professional standards of practice resulting in harm for 1 (Resident #37) resident out of 31 final sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #37 on 07/29/2024 when the facility's process for medication reconciliation failed as evidenced by: 1.S3LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) failed to reconcile Resident #37's medications when the resident was readmitted to the facility following discharge from HC1 (Hospital Center) to remove an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter on 07/29/2024. The resident's discharge orders from HC1 included administration of the anticoagulant Eliquis 5 mg (milligrams) twice daily. -S6ADON and S11LPN further failed to follow the facility's standard of practice to conduct an additional review of Resident #37's medications reconciled by S3LPN. The resident's order for Eliquis 5 mg (milligrams) twice daily had not been resumed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-03 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results of the facility were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. The facility's census was 71.Findings:On 12/02/2025 at 9:05 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing). S2DON stated the survey results were pinned on the bulletin board in a packet outside of social service's office door only. S2DON confirmed the last survey results from 10/01/2025 were not in the packet and should have been posted in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, or legal representatives.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-03 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing information posted daily was accurate and current. The facility's census was 71.Findings:On 12/02/2025 at 9:00 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing). S2DON confirmed that the nurse staffing data was posted on a whiteboard upon entry into the facility at the nurse's station. S2DON stated the nurse staffing data was from 12/01/2025. S2DON confirmed the nurse staffing data should have been updated daily and was not.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 (Resident #2, Resident #27, Resident #31) out of 35 sampled residents. Resident #27 Review of Resident #27's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included but not limited to polyosteoarthritis, neuropathy, vertebrogenic low back pain, muscle spasm of back, and cutaneous abscess of left lower limb. Further review of Resident #27's medical diagnosis did not reveal a diagnosis for left drop foot. Review of Resident #27 quarterly (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/08/2025 revealed BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 14 which indicated Resident #27 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #27's Medical Progress Note dated 05/14/2025 revealed a diagnosis of left foot drop.An interview was conducted on 12/01/2025 at 10:15 a.m. with Resident #27. Resident #27 stated she had left drop foot and had a brace to help her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care between the physical therapy department and nursing services for a resident who had leg prosthetic devices that no longer fit for 1 (#4) out of 35 sampled residents reviewed for quality of care.Findings:Review of Resident #4's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed, in part, Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included complete traumatic amputation at level between knee and ankle, left lower leg and right lower leg, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated of 10/18/2025 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 14 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Functional Abilities and Goals (GG) revealed ADL (activities of daily living) as self care deficit and lower extremity impairment on both sides.Review of Resident #4's care plan revealed bilateral (both sides) BKA (below knee amputation), with the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen, as evidenced by: 1. Equipment: A. Build-up of debris and brown substance inside the ice machine. B. Build-up of debris and food particles inside the microwave.2. Food storage: A. Walk-in Refrigerator 1. [NAME] and fuzzy patches on the inside and outside of a honey mustard container. 2. A container of lemon juice with an expiration date of 09/28/2025. B. Stand-up Refrigerator 1. A bag of bread not labeled with the date it was opened. 2. A piece of pie not labeled with the date it was prepared. C. Dry Storage 1. A bag of rice bag opened with an expiration date of 04/23/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 68 residents who ate out of the kitchen.Findings:A review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage with a last review date of 06/23/2025, reads in part, All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated ( use by date).A review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitization with a last review date of 08/2025, reads…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code a resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for 1 (Resident #14) out of 1 (Resident #14) investigated for resident assessments.Review of Resident #14's EHR (electronic health record) revealed she was admitted to the facility 07/14/2022 with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder.Review of Resident #14's most recent MDS (significant change) dated 09/11/2025 revealed under Section A1500 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was coded as no to the question Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or related condition?Review of Resident #14's PASRR Level II Evaluation dated 09/16/2024 under the determination results section revealed Serous Mental Illness present. On 12/02/2025 2:30 p.m., an interview with S6MDS/LPN. During the interview, she reviewed Section…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. This was evidenced by 1 (Resident #62) having untrimmed and unclean fingernails out of 2 Residents #61 and #62) investigated for ADLs. Findings:Review of Resident #62's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere; and unspecified osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/15/2025 revealed in Section GG that the resident required partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene.Review of Resident #62's care plan revealed in part, the resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit, with an intervention that read:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan to remove the AV (arteriovenous) shunt pressure dressing for 1 (Resident #28 ) out of 1 (Resident #28 ) resident reviewed for dialysis.Findings:Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of right middle cerebral artery, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis.Review of Resident #28's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/21/2025 revealed in Section C that the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident had normal thinking and memory.Review of Resident #28's December 2025 physician's orders revealed an order written on 12/15/2023 which read in part, dialysis M-W-F (Monday-Wednesday-Friday).Review of Resident #28's care plan revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a mechanically altered diet as ordered by the physician for 1 (#21) out of 5 (#1, #21, #31, #56, #67) residents reviewed for dining.Findings: Review of Resident #21's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, non-infective gastroenteritis and colitis, dysphagia and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of Resident #21's December 2025 physician's orders revealed an order dated 04/02/2025 that read, NAS (No Added Salt) diet, Chopped Meat Texture, Thin Consistency, Bite sized Meats. On 12/02/2025 at 11:41 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #21's meal tray. Resident #21's meal tray revealed a piece of rotisserie chicken leg. The meat item was not chopped or bite sized. On 12/03/2025 at 8:08 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #21's meal ticket and meal tray. Resident #21's meal ticket read in part, Chopped Meat. Meal tray…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation across the resident's record that the resident was discharged from hospice services for 1 (#6) out of 35 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #6's electronic medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and cachexia. Review of Resident #6's December 2025 physician's orders revealed an order dated 09/10/2025 that read, Admit to contracted hospice provider related to CVA (cerebrovascular accident) dx (diagnosis. Further review of physician's orders revealed an order dated 09/11/2025 that read, Accucheck (blood sugar check) daily. Notify contracted hospice provider nurse if greater than 200. Review of Resident #6's October 2025 progress notes revealed a nurses note dated 10/16/2025 that read in part.resident seen by facility's medical director today post hospice D/C (discharge). On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,508 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $17,254 — penalty dated 2024-11-06
• $17,254 — penalty dated 2024-11-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXION HEALTH — 51 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $431K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA