New Iberia Manor North
1803 Jane Street, New Iberia, LA 70563 · For profit - Corporation · 101 certified beds · (337) 365-2466 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.1% | 17.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.0% | 5.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 1.2% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 2.3% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.7% | 17.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.9% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.4% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.5% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.0% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.3% | 22.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.4% | 3.1% | 1.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.0% | 76.3% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.1% | 28.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.0% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.79 | 2.56 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.68 | 2.74 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 52.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.8–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 2.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.5–13.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 76.7 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.14 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.12 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles as evidenced by having medication labels and physician orders that did not reflect the correct route of administration for 2 (#28, #54) out of 2 (#28, #54) residents whose physician orders and medication labels were reviewed. Findings: Resident #28 Review of resident #28's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Dysphagia, Aphasia, and Gastrostomy Status. Review of resident #28's medical record revealed a Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 01/29/2025, which read in part . Section K. Nutritional Approaches .Feeding Tube .was indicated. Review of physician orders dated May 2025 for resident #28 revealed the following: 1. Atorvastatin Calcium Tablet 20 mg (milligrams), give 20 mg by mouth at bedtime 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen, as evidenced by: 1. Equipment: A. Build-up of debris and brown substance inside the conventional oven and the inside of the oven doors. 2. Food storage: A. Walk-in Refrigerator 1. A container of Roux (thickening agent for cooking) not labeled with the date it was opened. 2. A container of chopped garlic with an expiration date of 03/17/2025. B. Walk-in Freezer 1. A bag of beef patties not labeled with the date it was opened. C. Dry Storage 1. One dented canned good. 2. A bag of pasta not labeled with the date it was opened. D. Main Kitchen: 1. Three bags of bread were not labeled with the date it was opened. 3. S4DC (Dietary Cook) without a hair restraint while in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 75 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings: A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Sanitization, with a last revision date of 01/2024, revealed, in part, the food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner . 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed accurately for 1 (#40) of 1 resident investigated for hospice services out of a finalized sample of 33 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #40's electronic health record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #40's current May 2025 physician's orders revealed an order dated 04/04/2025 to admit to Hospice provider related to protein cal (calorie) malnutrition dx (diagnosis). Review of the resident's significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed under Section J-Health Conditions, prognosis - Does the resident have a condition or chronic disease that may result in a life expectancy of less than 6 months, was answered No. On 05/14/2025 at 3:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S6MDS (Minimum Data Set Nurse) who verified Resident #40 started hospice services on 04/04/2025 and should have been coded under Section J…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for 1 (#72) out of 1 (#72) sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care by: 1. Failing to follow physician's orders for changing nebulizer treatment tubing every week; and 2. Failing to follow physician's orders for respiratory prior and after orders when administering nebulizer treatments Findings: On 05/14/2025, a review of facility's policy, titled Administering Medications through a Small Volume (Handheld) Nebulizer, with a last revision date of October 2010, revealed in part .Documentation .The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record .2. The date, time, and length of treatment .5. Pulse, respiratory rate and lung sounds before and after the treatment .8. The resident's tolerance of treatment . Review of Resident #72's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#44) out of 33 sampled residents. The facility had a census of 78. Findings: Review of the facility's policy with a revision date of February 2018 titled, Fingernails/Toenails, Care of read in part, Purpose: the purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections .General Guidelines, 1. Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming. Review of Resident #44's clinical record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses include, in part, Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, Diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, Tracheostomy and gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #44's annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (#34) indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was positioned off the floor for 1 (#34) out of 2 (#34 and #48) residents investigated for urinary catheter. The total census was 78 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy with a review date of 01/01/2024 and a revised date of March 2024, titled, Catheter Care, Urinary read in part .Infection Control: .2. b. be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Record review revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses in part, Encounter for palliative care, Encounter for prophylactic measures, unspecified, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #34's care plan revealed she was care planned for indwelling catheter. On 05/13/2025 at 11:00 a.m., Resident #34's urinary catheter drainage bag was observed out of the blue privacy bag on the floor under the resident's bed. On 05/13/2025 at 11:05 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure there was a sufficient number of Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) and Shower Aides to provide services in accordance with resident care plans for 1 (Resident #2) of 4 (Residents #1 - #3, and R1) sampled residents. The facility's census was 76. Findings: On 04/15/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting with a revision date of 03/2018 read in part, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good .grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care) . Resident #2 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for 1 (Resident #1) out of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #R1, and Resident #R2) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Findings: On 12/03/2024, a review of the facility's manual titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy with a last revision date of 05/17/2024, read in part: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and financial abuse. The policy also indicated verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging or derogatory terms to resident or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Review of Resident #1's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Cerebral Infarction, Aphasia, and Dementia. Review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and adequately intervene when the resident reported his pain medication was not treating his pain effectively for 1 resident (#326) out of 1 sampled resident (#326) for pain. Findings: Review of Resident #326's electronic record revealed an admission date of 05/07/2024 with diagnoses that included Pain Unspecified, Other Chronic Pain, and Chronic Venous Hypertension (Idiopathic) with Ulcer of Bilateral Lower Extremity. Review of Resident #326's MAR (Medication Administration Record) for May 2024 revealed the resident was ordered and received: Acetaminophen Tablet 650 mg (Milligrams). Give one tablet by mouth three times a day related to Other Chronic Pain, started on 05/07/2024. Gabapentin Capsule 300 mg. Give 1 capsule by mouth three times a day related to Other Chronic Pain, started on 05/07/2024. Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Tablet 7.5-325mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain, started on 05/07/2024. Review of his MAR indicated the resident had been receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-15 · tag F0710 — patternObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Nurse Practitioner (NP): 1. Re-evaluated Resident # 66's urinary tract infection symptoms after lab (laboratory) results were received for 1(#66) of 3 residents (#66, #35, #52) investigated for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection); and 2. Responded to staff reporting a change in medical status for 2 (#66, #326) of 2 residents (#66, #326) investigated for UTI and Pain. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 73 residents that reside at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #66 Review of Resident #66's electronic record revealed an admission date of 01/09/2024 with diagnoses that included Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #66's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. Review of a S15NP's Progress Note dated 03/26/2024 revealed that Resident #66 was assessed for a chief complaint of frequency with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that their medication error rate was less than five percent, by failing to administer medications at the right time for 4 of 4 (#16, #41, #53, and #67) residents observed during morning medication pass. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 74 residents. Findings: On 05/15/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications with a revision date of 04/05/2024, read in part: Policy heading: Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed .3. Staffing schedules are arranged to ensure that medications are administered without unnecessary interruptions .7. Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified . A review of the facility's medication pass schedule revealed Med Pass Times: Culture Times .BID (twice a day): 6 a.m. (before noon) - 11 a.m., 7 p.m. (after noon) - 10 p.m. TID (three time a day): 6 a.m. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident was treated with respect and dignity as evidenced by the facility failing to keep a resident's urine collection bag covered and private for 1 (Resident # 35) of 3 residents (# 35, # 52 and # 66) investigated for urinary catheter or urinary tract infection. Findings: Review of Resident # 35's electronic medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, in part: Urinary Tract Infection, Other Retention of Urine, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia without Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Review of Resident # 35's current physician orders for May 2024 revealed, in part: 03/19/2024- Foley Catheter Care Q (every) Shift and PRN (as needed); Privacy bag or covering over urine collection bag for dignity every evening and night shift. Review of Resident # 35's care plan revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter with an intervention of privacy bag or covering over urine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed accurately for 1 (#31) out of 35 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #31's electronic clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included in part Hypertension, Angina Pectoris, Cerebral Infarction and Venous insufficiency (Chronic) (Peripheral). Review of the resident's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 02/14/2024 revealed under Section N-Medications, the resident was coded for the use of an anticoagulant (blood thinner). Review of the resident's active physician order as of 05/15/2024 revealed no order for an anticoagulant medication. On 05/15/2024 at 2:53 p.m., a review of Resident # 31's MDS dated [DATE] and current physician orders was conducted with S9RMDS (Regional MDS). S9RMDS stated that according to the physician orders, Resident #31 was not ordered any anticoagulant medications. She confirmed that the resident's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a newly diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 2 (Resident #37 and #57) of 2 (#37 and #57) residents investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 35 residents. Findings: Resident #37 A review of Resident 37#'s medical record revealed an admission date of 03/01/2024. Further review revealed he was diagnosed with Unspecified Psychosis on 03/13/2024. Further review of Resident #37's medical record revealed a Level 1 PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) dated 03/01/2024. No PASARR Level II was noted in Resident #37's record. On 05/15/2024 at 12:43 p.m., an interview was conducted with S11SSD (Social Service Director) and S1ADM (Administrator) regarding resubmission for a Level II PASARR after a diagnosis of Unspecified Psychosis. S1ADM stated she would look into the matter, and would update when available. On 05/15/2024 at 3:45 p.m., an interview was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a qualifying mental disorder, was not admitted to the facility before a preadmission screening by the State Office of Behavioral Health (OBH) was completed or obtained for 1 (#33) of 4 (#31, #33, #37, and #57) residents investigated for PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) out of 34 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Major Depressive Disorder and Psychotic Disorder with Delusions Due to Known Physiological Condition. A review of the resident's quarterly MDS (Minimun Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 03/18/2024 revealed under section I: Primary Medical Condition, that the resident had diagnoses which included Depression and Psychotic Disorder. A review of the resident's current plan of care revealed: 1)The resident was physically aggressive. On 05/03/2023 the resident had a physical fight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for 2 (#37 and #66) out of 2 residents investigated for care plans out of a total sample of 35 residents by: 1. failing to follow physician's orders for completing wound care for Resident #37, 2. failing to request a urine C/S (culture and sensitivity) from the laboratory after order was received for Resident #66 Findings: 1. Resident #37 Review of Resident #37's electronic medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: Cerebral Infarction, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Contracture of Left Hand, and History of Falling. Review of Resident #37's nurse's notes revealed the resident had a fall on 04/21/2024 that resulted in a skin tear above his right eyebrow. Review of Resident #37's April 2024 physician's orders revealed the following order dated 04/25/2024: Skin tear right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to perform daily wound care as ordered by the physician and failed to provide weekly wound assessments for 1 (#48) of 3 (#17, #35 and #48) residents investigated for pressure ulcers. Findings: Review of Resident #48's electronic health record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Cerebral Ischemia, End Stage Renal Disease, Arteriovenous Fistula, Atherosclertoic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, Moderate Protein Malnutrition, and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. Review of Resident #48's May 2024 physician's orders revealed the following: orders dated 04/13/2024: Right big top of toe, clean with normal saline, pat dry, apply betadine, leave open to air, every day until healed; Right foot inner heel, clean with normal saline, pat dry, apply betadine and cover with dressing, every day until healed. Further review revealed the following orders dated 05/01/2024: DTI (deep tissue injury) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that a resident (#62) with limited range of motion received the appropriate treatment and services by failing to implement recommendation by the physical therapy department for the restorative nursing program for 1 (#62) of 1 resident investigated for position/mobility in a total sample of 35 residents. Findings: Review of the resident's electronic record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses in part: Cerebral Vascular Accident, Unspecified Myoneural Disorder, Muscle wasting and atrophy, right and left thigh and lower leg, and Lack of coordination. On 05/13/2024 at 10:52 a.m., Resident #62 stated she received 3 to 4 days of therapy after she was admitted , but she was no longer receiving therapy because her insurance would not pay for the therapy. When asked if she was on a restorative program, she replied No. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 04/11/2024 revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from accidents for 1 (#37) of 2 (#37 and #61) residents investigated for accidents. Findings: Review of Resident #37's electronic health record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Cerebral Infarction, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Contracture of Left Hand and History of Falling. Review of Resident #37's significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 04/11/2024, revealed he had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 8, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #37's care plan revealed he was at risk for falls and for an actual fall. Further review of the plan of care revealed Resident #37 had actual falls on 03/02/2024, 03/05/2024, 03/09/2024 and 04/21/2024. Interventions included in part .staff assist back to bed when ready. A review of the facility's investigative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received necessary respiratory care and services as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure the resident was assessed for respiratory therapy and 2. Failing to obtain a physician's order for respiratory therapy. This deficient practice was evidenced for 1 (Resident # 35) of 3 residents (# 35, # 50 and # 71) investigated for respiratory care. Findings: On 05/14/2024 a review of the facility's Policy and procedure titled, Oxygen Administration, with a revision date of February 2023, revealed in part: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration .Verify that there is a physician's order .Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident .Before administering oxygen, and while the resident is receiving oxygen therapy, assess for the following: .4. Vital Signs . Documentation: After completing the oxygen setup or adjustment, the following information should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility as evidenced by failing to change the physician's order to reflect dialysis treatment days for 1 (#48) out 1 (#48) resident investigated for dialysis. Findings: Review of Resident #48's electronic health record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Arteriovenous Fistula, and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. Review of Resident #48's care plan read in part . The resident needs hemodialysis r/t (related to) ESRD with Pulmonary Edema/Congestion .new order noted: Resident to receive dialysis 3 days a week on M, W, F (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) at dialysis center. Review of the Resident #48's nurses notes dated 05/10/2024 at 2:35 p.m. revealed, pt (patient) will have a new day and time starting 5/13/2024. Chair time will be at 11:15 MWF notified van driver. Review of Resident #48's May…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a RN (Registered Nurse) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours per day for 7 days per week. Findings: Review of the facility's PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 1, 2024 (October1 - December 31), revealed a One Star Staffing Rating. Review of Time Card Reports and RN (Registered Nurse) clock in hours for the months of October 2023 to December 2023 revealed an RN did not work a total of 8 hours for the following dates in October 2023: 10/13, 10/16, 10/17, 10/30, and 10/31. Further review revealed an RN did not work a total of 8 hours for the following dates in November 2023: 11/13, 11/14, 11/15, 11/20, and 11/22. On 05/14/2024 at 2:50 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with S1PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) who confirmed that the facility did not have an RN for 8 hours per day for the dates mentioned from October and November of 2023.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for 2 (#27, #37) residents out of 3 (#27, #30, #37) residents who received pureed diets. Findings: Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: Unspecified Dementia and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease. Review of Resident #27's physician's orders revealed a diet order dated 08/04/2022 that read in part: Regular diet, pureed texture, thin consistency. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: Other Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease. Review of Resident #37's physician's orders revealed an order dated 04/03/2024 that read in part: Reduced Concentrated Sweets diet, pureed texture, nectar thickened consistency. Review of the facility's menu for 05/13/2024 revealed breakfast consisted of the following food items: Cereal Cream of Wheat, Scrambled Egg, Bacon Strip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident received a mechanically soft chopped meats diet as ordered for 1 (# 61) of 3 (# 61, # 66, and # 71) residents investigated for food concerns in a final sample of 34 residents. Findings: Review of Resident # 61's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, in part . Sequelae Cerebral Infarction, Potential for Malnutrition, Other Speech and Language Deficits Following Cerebral Infarction. Review of the resident's physician orders for May 2024 revealed an order dated 02/01/2024, Mechanical soft texture, thin consistency, chop meats, no grapefruit products Review of the resident's care plan revealed Focus: Dietary Concern Speech Deficits, Protein Calorie Malnutrition Interventions included: Mechanical soft texture, thin consistency, chop meats, no grapefruit products. On 05/13/2024 at 8:55 a.m., an observation was made of Resident # 61 sitting up on the side of his bed feeding himself…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service and ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen by failing to: 1. Ensure cooked food items were not stored on the same shelf as raw food items; 2. Remove expired food items from the kitchen's walk in cooler. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage with a last reviewed date of January 2023 read in part: 12. Uncooked and raw animal products and fish will be stored separately in drip-proof containers and below fruits, vegetable and other ready-to-eat foods. On 05/13/2024 at 6:30 a.m., an observation was made of the kitchen's walk in cooler with S5DM (Dietary Manager). Observation of the cooler revealed a bottom shelf to the right of the cooler. There were 2 rolls of uncooked ground beef defrosting in a pan on the bottom shelf, and uncooked sausage and raw chicken defrosting in a second pan. In between the two pans, was a large pan covered in foil labeled with a date of 5/11 and pinto beans. S5DM stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by failing to ensure clean laundry and linen was not stored on the contaminated side of the laundry department. Findings: A review of the facility's environmental services policy with a last revised date of 10/2023, read in part: Laundry Flow .After washing, clean linens should be transported from the washing area to the drying area .Linen Storage .Clean linen must always be kept separate from contaminated linen through the use of separate rooms, closets, or other designated spaces with a closing door as the most secure methods for reducing the risk of accidental contamination. On 05/13/2024 at 10:29 a.m., an observation was made of the laundry department. S12Laundry was observed on the contaminated side of the laundry department placing soiled linen into the washing machines. She stated that clean laundry could not be stored on the contaminated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to have a plan in place to ensure how treatments were going to be completed when the treatment nurse resigned. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 75 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Upon entry to the facility on [DATE] at 9:00 a.m., S10LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she was a prn (as needed) staff and helped the facility with completing treatments. She pulled up the facility's list of resident's with current wound and skin treatments, which failed to include Resident #2. On 11/28/2023 at 9:30 a.m., S11LPN was asked to provide surveyor with names of current residents on her assigned hall who currently received wound and skin treatments. S11LPN stated Resident #2 had an unstageable pressure ulcer. Record review of sampled residents' October 2023 and November 2023 electronic Treatment Administration Records (eTARs) revealed there was no documentation to indicate the treatments were completed as ordered. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure the resident's care plan and physician's orders were followed for 6 (#1, and R1-R5) out of 8 (#1-#3, R1-R5) sampled residents as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure a floor mat was at the bedside for Resident #1 and; 2. Failing to ensure skin and wound treatments were completed as ordered for Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Care plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered read in part .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measureable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses in part: Flaccid Hemiplegia Affecting Right Dominant Side, Unspecified Non-displaced Fracture of Surgical Neck of Right Humerus, Repeated Falls, and Generalized Anxiety. Review of Resident #1's November 2023 physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was accurately updated with the appropriately identified problem areas and interventions to reflect the resident's current wound status for 2 (#2, and #3) out of 8 (#1, #2, #3, R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, read in part .8. The comprehensive, person centered care plan will: .g. Incorporate identified problem areas .further review of facility policy .13. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition change. Resident #2 Review of the Resident #2's electronic medical record revealed he was admitted to facility on 08/20/2021 with the following pertinent diagnoses: Spinal Stenosis-Lumbar Region with Neurogenic Claudication, Spinal Stenosis-Thoracic Region, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Lymphedema…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide weekly wound assessments and failed to perform daily wound care as ordered for 2 (#2 and #3) out of 2 (#2 and #3) residents investigated for pressure ulcers out of a final sample of 8 residents (#1-#3 and R1-R5). Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention Program, revealed in part: Standard: All residents will be assessed for risk of pressure injury development at the time of admission, on a quarterly basis, and upon significant change in condition thereafter. Each resident will also receive a weekly skin check to identify new areas of concern or the development of new pressure injuries to ensure a timely adjustment to the resident's change in condition/risk level. 6. Weekly Wound Assessment a. Each identified skin issue/area is assessed weekly in electronic medical record for: Size Stage (staged by RN (Registered Nurse) or PT (Physical Therapist)) Location Drainage amount If odor is present Signs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary, environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by failing to remove contaminated gloves and perform hand hygiene during wound care for 1 (#3) resident out of 7 (#2, #3, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5) residents investigated for wound/skin treatments. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Washing and Hand Hygiene, read in part .7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations . g. Before handling clean or soiled dressings, gauze pads, etc .i. After contact with a resident's intact skin. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses in part .Other Cord Compression, Myotonic Muscular Dystrophy, Unspecified Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Pressure Ulcer of Right Hip Stage 3, and Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region Stage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment by failing to ensure a resident's urine was properly disposed of in order to prevent the overly pungent odor of urine for 1 (#2) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Homelike Environment revealed, in part, the following: Policy Statement: Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment . Policy Interpretation and Implementation .2. The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: a. clean, sanitary and orderly environment .pleasant, neutral scents . Review of Resident #2's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following pertinent diagnoses= Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Lumbar Region, Major Depressive Disorder-Recurrent, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews the facility failed to ensure their grievance policy and procedure was followed. The facility failed to initiate grievances that were voiced for 1 (#2) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) sampled residents. Findings: Record review of the policy titled, Filing Grievances/Complaints read in part, Our facility will assist residents, their representatives .in filing grievances .when such request are made .2. Grievances may be submitted orally or in writing .6. The Administrator has delegated the responsibility of grievance and/or complaint investigation to the grievance officer. 7. Upon receipt of a written grievance .the grievance officer will review and investigate the allegations and summit a written report of such findings to the administrator within 72 hours of receiving the grievance. 10. The Administrator will review the findings with the Grievance Officer to determine what corrective action .to be taken . 13. The results of all grievances filed, investigated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service and ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen by failing to: 1. Ensure kitchen staff wore hair coverings while in the kitchen; 2. Ensure expired food items were removed from the cooler; 3. Ensure expired food items were removed from the dry goods storage room; 4. Ensure food items were labeled with the date and time it was opened; 5. Ensure the refrigerator was clean; 6. Ensure beverages that were not for residents were not stored the refrigerator; and 7. Ensure air conditioning vents were free of dust and debris. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 70 residents who consumed food and beverages from the kitchen. The facility's census was 73. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Refrigerators and Freezers read in part .The facility will ensure safe refrigerator and freezer maintenance, temperatures, and sanitation, and will observe food expiration guidelines .7. All food shall be appropriately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment by failing to ensure the window air conditioner (AC) unit was working for 1 (#3) of 5 (#3, #28, #33, #42 and #53) residents investigated for environment. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Homelike Environment revealed, in part, the following: Policy Statement: Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment . 2. The facility staff and management maximized, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting . h. comfortable temperatures. Review of Resident #3's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Cerebral Infarction, Epilepsy, Hypothyroidism, Shortness of Breath, Body Mass Index 45.0-49.9 and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Review of Resident #3's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews the facility failed to ensure their grievance policy and procedure was followed. The facility failed to initiate grievances that were voiced for 2 (#21 and #57) of 2 ( #21 and #57) residents investigated for grievances Findings: Record review of the policy titled, Filing Grievances/Complaints read in part, Our facility will assist residents, their representatives .in filing grievances .when such request are made .2. Grievances may be submitted orally or in writing .3. Actions on such issues will be responded to in writing, including a rational for the response .6. The Administrator has delegated the responsibility of grievance and/or complaint investigation to the grievance officer. 7. Upon receipt of a written grievance .the grievance officer will review and investigate the allegations and summit a written report of such findings to the administrator within 72 hours of receiving the grievance. 10. The Administrator will review the findings with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan by failing to follow physician order to document a resident's (#177) meal intake percentages for 1 (#177) of 2 (#64, #177) sampled residents for nutrition. Findings: Review of the facility document titled Charting and Documentation read in part, policy Interpretation and Implementation: .2. The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: a. Objective observations .; f. Progress toward or changes in the care plan goals and objectives. Record review revealed Resident #117 was admitted on [DATE]. Further review of the record revealed, in part, diagnoses of Anorexia, Chronic kidney disease, Iron deficiency anemia, Vitamin deficiency, and Unspecified protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the resident's monthly weights revealed: 10/07/2022 - 179.0 11/07/2022 - 165.2 12/07/2022 - 159.4 01/07/2023 - 151.4 02/14/2023 - 154.4 03/07/2023 - 151.8 Review of physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#45) of 3 (#45, #53 and #71) residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide toenail care for Resident #45. Findings: Review of Resident #45's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Cerebral infarction, Aphasia, and Flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side. Review of physician orders dated 08/04/2022 read in part, podiatry consult for complaint of overgrown thick and painful toenails. Review of care plan dated 03/29/2023 read in part, nail care as needed; nurse to cut nails since diabetic. On 04/17/2023 at 11:27 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #45's toe nails. The resident's family stated that his toe nails were too long and needed to be cut. Upon Further observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing as evidenced by the staff failing to follow physician's orders for wound care for 2 (#51, #126) out of 4 (#20, #43, #51, #126) residents investigated with pressure ulcers out of a total sample of 36 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #51 Review of Resident #51's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Other Encephalitis and Encephalomyelitis, Osteomyelitis, Bacteria Infection, Type Two Diabetes Mellitus, and Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Review of Resident #51's current physician's orders list revealed an order on 03/21/2023 Left bottom of foot: Clean with wound cleanser, pat dry apply non-adherent dressing cover with ABD (abdominal) wrap with kerlix and secure with tape daily until resolved every day shift. A review of Resident #51's April…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interview the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 (#45) of 2 (#33, #45) resident reviewed for position and mobility. The facility failed to ensure resident #45 wore a splint 4 hours daily for a right hand contracture and received restorative services as ordered. Findings: Review of Resident #45's electronic medical record revealed an admit date of 10/22/2020 with diagnoses that included Cerebral vascular accident, Flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, and Aphasia. Review of Resident 45's physician orders dated 10/12/2022 read in part, restorative nursing program 6-7 days a week for bed mobility; active range of motion (AROM) related to muscle weakness. Review of Resident 45's care plan dated 3/29/2023 read in part, risk for loss of range of motion right dominant sided hemiplegia secondary to cerebral vascular accident. Intervention included the following: nursing staff to perform range of motion (ROM) with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to minimize the risk of contamination of a resident's tube feeding for 1 resident (# 73) investigated for tube feeding out of a total sample of 36 residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 6 residents who received tube feedings in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Enteral Feedings- Safety Precautions read in part .2. The facility will remain current in and follow accepted best practices in enteral nutrition. Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy, Aphasia, Dysphagia Following Cerebral Infarction, and Flaccid Hemiplegia Affecting Right Dominant Side. Review of Resident #73's MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed she received 51% or more of total calories and 501 cc's (Cubic Centimeters) per day or more of fluid intake by tube feeding. Review of Resident #73's April 2023 physician's orders revealed an order dated 03/23/2023 that read:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure nasal cannulas were stored in plastic bags as required by their policy for 1 (#176) of 4 (#59, #70, #71, #176) residents investigated for respiratory care. Findings: Record review of policy titled, Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) Prevention of Infection read in part, Purpose .prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy .8. Keep the oxygen cannulae and tubing used PRN (as needed) in a plastic bag when not in use. Record review revealed Resident #176 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Lobar Pneumonia, Cardiac Arrest, Pneumonitis, Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure, Hypoxia, Chronic Kidney disease, Chronic Systolic Heart Failure, Iron Deficiency Anemia, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, and Transient ischemic Attack. Record review of Resident #176's active Physicians Orders read in part, 02 (Oxygen) at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula PRN (as needed) Keep O2 sats (Saturation) > (greater…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 (#53) resident in a final sample of 36 residents. The facility failed to ensure nurses' medication administration documentation was accurate for Resident #53. Findings: Review of Resident #53's Electronic Health Record revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses in part: .[NAME] Syndrome, Ileostomy Status, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Obesity, Rash and Other Nonspecific Skin Eruption. Review of March 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an order dated 03/30/2023 for Betamethasone Dipropionate Augmented External Gel 0.05%- Apply to back rash topically two times a day for rash for 14 days. Further review of the MAR revealed the medication was documented as administered on 03/31/2023 by S15LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-19 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to make an appointment with a dentist for 1 (#21) of 3 (#21, #45 and #176) residents investigated for dental care. Findings: Record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with accumulative diagnoses including Dysphagia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Symbolic Dysfunctions, Cochlear Implant, Major Depressive, Repeated Falls, Muscle weakness, Need for assistance with personal Care, Lack of Coordination, Anxiety and Parkinson's disease. Record review of Resident #21's Care plan read in part, The resident has oral/dental health problems r/t (Related to) has dentures but they are loose for resident .Coordinate arrangements for dental care .Document/Report PRN (as needed) any .dental problems needing attention .loose .in mouth. On 04/17/2023 at 10:21 a.m., an observation revealed Resident #21's upper dentures were loose and falling down while she spoke. At this time, Resident #21 stated her dentures were brand new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-19 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service by failing to have a certified dietary manager on staff. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 70 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 73. Findings: On 4/17/2023 at 7:10 a.m., S6DM (Dietary Manager) was asked to provide her certification for food service management and safety. S6DM stated that she completed trainings but did not have a certification. She further stated that she has been the dietary manager for 2 years and was not certified. She stated the registered dietitian, who made rounds at the facility once a month, was supposed to schedule the class for her, but she did not. On 4/17/2023 at 8:44 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1Adm (Administrator) who stated that the facility was in the process of ensuring S6DM was certified. He stated S6DM completed online trainings, but failed the test. On 04/18/2023 at 10:04 a.m., an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an accurate record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. The facility failed to accurately document temperatures on Resident # 3's Personal Refrigerator Temperature Log for April 2023. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, titled Charting and Documentation revealed, in part, the following: Policy Interpretation and Implementation: . 3. Documentation . will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate. Review of Resident #3's Personal Refrigerator Temperature Log on 04/17/2023 revealed no temperatures documented on April 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, 2023. Review of Resident #3's Personal Refrigerator Temperature Log on 04/18/2023 revealed 42 degrees documented on April 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17, 2023 with S10CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistant) signature for those dates. On 04/18/2023 at 8:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with S10CNA. S10CNA stated she was the designated personnel to document on Resident #3's Personal Refrigerator Temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-19 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with a hospice agency to ensure residents had a Hospice Plan of Care for 2 (#17, #378) out of 2 residents reviewed for hospice services in a total investigative sample of 36 residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 2 residents receiving hospice services as documented on the facility's Resident Census and Conditions form (CMS-672). Findings Review of the facility's policy titled Hospice Program read in part .12. Our facility has designated .to coordinate care provided to the resident by our facility staff and the hospice staff.d. Obtaining the following information from the hospice: 1. the most recent hospice plan of care specific to each resident .13. Coordinated care plans for residents receiving hospice services will include the most recent hospice plan of care as well as the care and services provided by our facility. Resident #17 Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NEXION HEALTH — 51 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 50 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 50; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEXION HEALTH OF OHI INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 12/31/2006 |
| NEXION HEALTH LEASING, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/15/2002 |
| NEXION HEALTH, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/15/2002 |
| BOLT, BRETTON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/15/2002 |
| KIRLEY, FRANCIS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/15/2002 |
| BREAUX, JR., ALVIN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/09/2014 |
| DANIEL, LISIMBA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/25/2021 |
| HERDRICH, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 02/01/2012 |
| RINER, MEERA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2012 |
| LEE, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2012 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $477K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195328. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.