No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadowview Health & Rehab Center

400 Meadowview Drive, Minden, LA 71055 · For profit - Corporation · 182 certified beds · (318) 377-1011 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (318) 377-1011 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
431 Homer Rd · (318) 377-8855 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.1 mi
214 Homer Rd · (318) 371-9837 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
214 Homer Rd · (318) 707-2749 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.8%17.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.5%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.5%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.1%17.9%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.5%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.7%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.3%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.3%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%3.1%1.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine63.9%76.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.4%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.8%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.692.561.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.192.741.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
31.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 31.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.5%CMS range 32.5–61.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.9%CMS range 8.6–18.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge31.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge29.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified4.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.5%CMS range 4.8–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.411.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
1.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
43.8%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 182 beds and averages 113.9 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-05-15)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free from psychosocial harm and physical restraints used for the purpose of discipline or convenience that were not required to treat the residents' medical conditions for 2 (#1, #2) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) sampled residents. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings:Review of the facility's policy title: Facility Policy on PSDs (Personal Safety Devices) -Enablers-Side Rails-Restraints-Involuntary Seclusion Revised March 2026 revealed, in part:Restraint Policy Intent:Patients/Residents have the right to be free from any physical restraint imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and when not required to treat the patient's/resident's medical condition. Patients/Residents have the right to function at their highest practicable level in the least restrictive environment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure staff reported alleged violations of abuse for the use of physical restraints to the administrator immediately or within 2 hours for 2 (#1, #2) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) sampled residents. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings:Review of policy titled Abuse Prohibition Policy reviewed and revised 02/26/2026 revealed, in part:INTENT:This protocol was intended to assist in the prevention of abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property.Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and financial abuse.POLICY:1. The facility will prohibit neglect, mental or physical abuse, including involuntary seclusion and the misappropriation of property or finances of residents.DEFINITIONS:Abuse means the willful infliction of injury,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. The facility failed to ensure oral care was provided for 1(#2) of 3 sampled residents.Findings:Review of Resident #2's record revealed an initial admission date of 02/04/2025 with the following diagnoses in part, other sequelae of cerebral infarction, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, aphasia, encounter for attention to tracheostomy and encounter for attention to gastrostomy.Review of Resident #2's care plan revealed in part: ADL self-care performance deficit related to a diagnosis of cardio vascular accident and respiratory failure with hypoxia. Further review of Resident #2's care plan revealed interventions which included oral care routine in the morning and at night: Brush teeth, clean gums with toothette and rinse mouth with wash.Review of Resident #2's MDS (Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a pressure ulcer received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents.Findings: Policy:Pressure Injury Prevention Program (Reviewed and Revised date of 06/27/2025)Standard: All residents will be assessed for the risk of pressure injury development at the time of admission, on a quarterly basis, and upon significant change in condition thereafter. Each resident will also receive a weekly skin check to identify new areas of concern or the development of new pressure injuries to ensure a timely adjustment to the resident's change in condition/risk level. Based on the results of these assessments, specific interventions will be implemented to prevent the development of avoidable pressure injuries, or, to treat new/existing pressure injuries.3. The following is a list of commonly used interventions to possibly prevent the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was seen face to face by a physician at least once every 60 days for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled records reviewed.Findings:Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included, in part: Chronic respiratory failure, osteomyelitis of vertebra, lumbar region, complete paraplegia, pressure ulcer to the sacral region and an encounter for attention to a tracheostomy.Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed one face to face physician visit dated 05/06/2025 from the admission date on 04/11/2025 to discharge date on 11/22/2025. Further review of Resident #1's medical record found no other documentation of a face to face physician visit with Resident #1.During an interview on 01/06/2026 at 3:18 p.m. S1 DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed Resident #1 only had one face to face physician visit from 04/11/2025 to 11/22/2025. S1 DON acknowledged a face to face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the provider failed to ensure ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Care was completed for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents. Findings:Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged from the facility on 09/02/2025. Resident #1's diagnoses included Multiple Sclerosis, muscle weakness, seizures, lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy, altered mental status, restlessness and agitation, polyosteoarthrits, Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance for bathing. The definition of substantial/maximal assistance meant the helper does more than half the effort. Helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort. Resident #1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 15, which would indicate the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#1) of 13 sampled residents reviewed was free from unnecessary drugs. The facility failed to monitor Resident #1's edema while receiving a diuretic. Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical records revealed an admit date of 01/30/2025 with the following diagnoses, including in part: acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, other pneumonia/unspecified organism, acute kidney failure/unspecified, and heart failure/unspecified. Review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan revealed: resident has hypertension - monitor for and document any edema/notify Medical Director. Review of Resident #1's Physician's orders revealed an order dated 01/30/2025 for Furosemide oral tablet 40mg (milligram); give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to edema. Review of Resident #1's February MAR (Medication Administration Record) failed to reveal edema was monitored while receiving diuretic. During an interview on 03/25/2025 at 2:10 p.m. S7 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) while reviewing Resident #1's February MAR, acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with a discharge instruction form. Findings: Review of Facility's - Transfer or Discharge, Facility Initiated (2001) Policy and Procedure: Policy Statement - Once admitted to the facility .require resident/representative notification and orientation, and documentation as specified in this policy. Orientation for Transfer or Discharge (Planned) - 1. A post-discharge plan is developed for each resident prior to his or her transfer or discharge. This plan will be reviewed with the resident, and/or his or her family, at least twenty-four (24) hours before the resident's discharge or transfer from the facility. Review of Resident #1's medical records revealed an admit date of 01/30/2025 and discharge date of 02/20/2025 with the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#2) out of 3 sampled residents reviewed received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers. The facility failed to: 1. Complete a head to toe assessment prior to discharge to hospital, and 2. Notify staff of change in skin status/injury. Findings: Review of Facility's Skin Integrity Prevention and Treatment Program Policy and Procedure revised 09/2024: Standard: All residents will be assessed for the risk of pressure development at the time of admission, on a quarterly basis, and upon significant change in condition thereafter. Procedure: All residents will have a head to toe assessment (skin check) completed on a weekly basis by the licensed nurse. 5. If a pressure injury/skin breakdown is identified, the following will be done - a. if pressure injury - complete new wound evaluation/assessment. d. notify RP or family . Review of Facility's Investigation Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to have documented evidence of turning and repositioning resident #1 to help prevent pressure ulcers. Findings: Review of the facility`s policy and procedure related to pressure injury prevention with a revision date of 09/2024 revealed in part: 3. The following is a list of commonly used interventions to possibly prevent the development of pressure injuries- a. Turning and positioning to include but not limited to: during and after care- activities of daily living, skin audits/dressing changes, transfers between surfaces and as needed. Record review for resident #1 revealed an admission date of 10/13/2023 with diagnoses including other displaced fracture of second cervical vertebra, acute chronic systolic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of injuries of unknown source with serious bodily injury was reported immediately, or within 2 hours of the allegation to the state agency for 1 (#2) of 2 (#1 and #2) residents sampled with facility incident reports. Findings: Review of the Abuse Prohibition Policy and Procedure with revision date of 05/17/2024 revealed the following, in part: Reporting/Response: 2.) The facility will report all allegations and substantiated occurrences of abuse, neglect or misappropriation of resident property to the state agency and to all other agencies as required by law and will take all necessary corrective actions depending on the results of the investigation. The Abuse Coordinator will report all allegations of abuse, neglect with serious bodily injury, mistreatment with serious bodily injury, exploitation with serious bodily injury, and injuries of unknown source with serious bodily injury immediately or within 2 hours of the allegation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (#2) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the record revealed resident #2 had an admission date of 10/13/2023 with diagnoses including other displaced fracture of second cervical vertebra, acute chronic systolic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, contusion and laceration of cerebrum without loss of consciousness, traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, degenerative disease of nervous system, muscle wasting and atrophy, spinal stenosis, syncope, chronic kidney disease, history of fractures, unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 (#2) of 3 (#2, #4, and #5) residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure fall risk assessments were completed quarterly, specific interventions were implemented based on the results of the risk assessments, and careplan interventions were implemented on readmission on [DATE]. Findings: Review of the facility's Fall Prevention Program Policy and Procedure, last revision dated 06/10/2024, policy and procedure revealed in part the following: Policy: All residents will be assessed for the risk for falls at the time of admission, on a quarterly basis, and upon significant change in condition thereafter. Based on the results of this assessment, specific interventions will be implemented to minimize falls, avoid repeat falls, and minimize falls resulting in significant injury. A. Procedure 1. All residents will be screened for risk for falls utilizing the Fall Risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff had appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing care to assist resident safety and maintain the highest practical physical, mental, and psychological well-being of each resident for 1 (#2) of 3 (#2, #4, and #5) residents sampled for accidents. The facility`s failed practice was evidenced by a Certified Nurse Aide's (CNA) failure to follow the facility's Incident/Accident policy and procedure when resident #2 was found on the floor on 08/06/2024. Findings: Review of the Policy for Resident Incident and Visitor Accident Report, revised 07/23/2018, reviewed June 2024, revealed the following, in part: B. Resident Incidents/Accidents: 1. If you witness an incident/accident, you must: -Immediately summon help -DO NOT move the resident until he/she has been assessed by a licensed nurse Review of the record revealed resident#2 had an admission date of 10/13/2023 with diagnoses including other displaced fracture of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-15 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #98 Based on record review and interviews the facility failed ensure a discharge assessment was completed for 1 (Resident #98) of 4 (Residents #6, #98, #103, #106) residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Findings: Record review of Resident #98's progress notes from 04/24/2024 revealed the following: General Nurse's Note- Writer notified by Wound Care NP (Nurse Practitioner) that Resident #98 needs to go to ER (Emergency Room) to be evaluated at this time due to worsened wounds and abnormal vital signs . General Nurse's Note- Ambulance arrived and transported Resident #98 to acute hospital . Record review of Resident #98's MDS (Minimum Data Set) failed to reveal a discharge assessment was completed after Resident #98 was sent to an acute hospital on [DATE]. During an interview on 05/14/2024 at 4:30 p.m. S12 MDS RN (Registered Nurse) verified she did not do a discharge assessment for Resident # 98 when he was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. During an interview on 05/14/2024 at 4:35 p.m. S2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 2 (#102,#118) of 3 (#10, #102,#118) residents reviewed for position and mobility. The facility failed to apply splints for Resident #102 and Resident #118 as ordered. Resident #102 Review of Resident #102's Medical Records revealed an admit date of 10/12/2023 with the following diagnoses, in part: anoxic brain damage/not elsewhere classified, muscle wasting and atrophy/right upper arm/left upper arm, contracture of muscle, and personal history of sudden cardiac arrest. Review of Resident #102's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section G Functional Status - total dependence/2 person - bed mobility, toilet use, eating, and transfer. Review of Resident #102's Physician's Orders revealed orders dated 05/03/2024 for resident to receive restorative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications from enteral feeding by failing to change enteral feeding container at appropriate interval for 1 (#37) out of 3 (#37, #42, #67) residents reviewed for tube feedings. Findings: Review of medical diagnosis revealed the following: Cerebral infarction Facial weakness from cerebrovascular accident Dysphagia Lack of coordination Unspecified dementia Review of resident #37's physician's orders revealed an order for Enteral feeding: every night shift give Jevity 1.5 or equivalent formula at 60 cc (cubic centemeter) per peg tube (1080 calories, 46 grams protein and 1656 cc fluid) order dated 04/27/2023. An observation on 05/13/2024 at 8:30 a.m. revealed peg tube feeding tubing and enteral feeding Jevity 1.5 were dated 05/09/2024. During and interview on 05/13/2024 at 9:00 a.m., S4 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) acknowledged resident #37's enteral feeding was dated 05/09/2024 and should have been changed every 24 hours. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-15 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a performance review had been completed at least every 12 months for 3 (S5CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant], S6CNA, S7CNA) of 5 (S5CNA, S6CNA, S7CNA, S8CNA, S10CNA) personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of S5CNA's personnel records revealed a hire date of 08/09/2022. Further review of S5CNA's personnel records failed to reveal evidence that a performance review had been conducted every 12 months. Review of S6CNA's personnel records revealed a hire date of 02/23/2023. Further review of S6CNA's personnel records failed to reveal evidence that a performance review had been conducted every 12 months. Review of S7CNA's personnel records revealed a hire date of 02/28/2023. Further review of S7CNA's personnel records failed to reveal evidence that a performance review had been conducted every 12 months. During an interview on 05/15/2024 at 4:40 p.m. S1Administrator reported she could not find evidence that performance reviews had been conducted every 12 months for S5CNA, S6CNA, or S7CNA.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to accommodate the needs of 1 (#38) of 39 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38 had a call light within reach. Findings: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included, in part, Alzheimer's disease unspecified, essential (primary) hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, other seizures, non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis. Review of Resident #38's 02/06/2024 Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed Resident #38 had a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) of 09 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #38's Care Plan revealed Resident #38 had an alteration in musculoskeletal status including interventions, in part, anticipate and meet needs and be sure call light is within reach and respond promptly. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure garbage was disposed properly. Findings: Observation on 05/13/2024 at 8:40 a.m. with S13 Maintenance Director revealed multiple trash bags and loose trash were scattered all around the perimeter of the dumpster outside of the facility. Lids to the dumpster were not closed. During an interview on 05/13/24 at 8:41 a.m. S13 Maintenance Director verified the trash should not be outside of the dumpster and dumpster lids should be closed.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) residents out of a total sample of 5 received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by: 1. Failing to provide needed care and services when a resident's physical condition changed, and 2. Failing to notify the resident's attending physician of emergency transfer. Findings: Review of the facility's Transfer or Discharge, Emergency Policy revealed in part: Policy Statement: Emergency transfers or discharges may be necessary to protect the health and/or well-being of the resident(s). Policy Interpretation and Implementation 4. Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital or other related institution, our facility will implement the following procedures: a. Notify the resident's attending physician. During an interview on [DATE] at 6:14 p.m. resident #1's RP (responsible party) reported when she arrived to the facility [DATE] 2:00 between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance was provided to prevent accidents. The facility failed to implement the plan of care for 1(#57) of 4(#27, #57, #102, #104) residents reviewed for accidents. Findings: Review of the facility's Incident Log revealed Resident #57 had an unwitnessed fall on 05/18/2023. Review of Resident #57's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 04/25/2023 revealed the functional status of the resident required support with two person physical assistance with transfers between surfaces including to or from the bed. Review of Resident #57's Care Plan dated 04/18/2023 revealed Resident #57 has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit due to a cerebral vascular accident and hemiplegia. As of 04/25/2023, Resident #57 needs 2 persons assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Further review of Resident #57's care plan revealed Resident #57 was at risk for falls. Review of the Incident Description dated 05/18/2023 revealed S12 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary condition by having a leak in the apple juice concentrate tubing of the drink station. This had the potential to affect 118 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 06/05/2023 at 11:00 a.m., an observation of the drink station in the kitchen revealed there was old clear tape wrapped around the tubing about five inches below where it connects to the apple juice concentrate bag. The apple juice concentrate bag was inside the manufactures cardboard box that was sitting on a stainless steel shelf under the drink station. Further observation revealed apple juice concentrate had pooled on the stainless steel shelf and also on the tile floor in front of the stainless steel shelf. On 06/05/2023 at 12:35 p.m., interview with S3 Dietary Manager revealed she was aware of the leak in the apple juice concentrate tubing yesterday, but thought it had stopped leaking. S3 Dietary Manager confirmed that the apple juice concentrate tubing was still leaking and needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations of abuse and misappropriation of resident property were reported no later than 24 hours to the State Survey Agency for 2 (#32 and #36) of 3 (#32, #36, #104) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy dated 03/2023, in part: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, withholding or misappropriating property or money, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Physical abuse includes, hitting, slapping, kicking, shoving, pinching, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. The facility will thoroughly investigate all alleged violations and take appropriate actions. The Abuse Coordinator will report such allegations to the state agency in accordance with state law. The Abuse Coordinator will report all allegations of abuse, neglect with serious bodily injury, mistreatment with serious bodily injury,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation of funds/exploitation for 1 (#36) of 3 (#32, #36, #104) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy dated 03/2023 revealed, in part, the facility will thoroughly investigate all alleged violations and take appropriate actions. Procedure for the investigation will include, but is not limited to the following: interviews and or written statements from individuals, (residents, visitors or staff), who may have firsthand knowledge of the incident. Written statements should be in the handwriting of the witness, signed, and dated. Review of the medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, psychosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, convulsions, incomplete C1 - C4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences for 2 (#67, #119) of 5 (#61, #67, #72, #119, #233) residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #67's wheelchair had leg rests in place. 2. Resident #119's right hand assist rail was tightly secured to the bedframe and the left hand assist rail was not present. Findings: 1.) Review of Resident #67's diagnoses revealed the following, but not limited to, generalized muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy, lack of coordination, and abnormal posture. Review of admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/22/2022 revealed Resident #67 used a wheel chair for mobility. Observation on 5/16/2022 at 11:30 AM revealed Resident # 67 sitting up in wheel chair with feet not touching the floor. Further observation of Resident #67 sitting up in wheel chair failed to reveal leg rests on wheel chair. Observation on 5/18/2022 at 12:00 PM revealed Resident # 67 sitting up in wheel chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was followed for 2 (#51 and #101) of 3 (#51, #94, #101) residents reviewed for position and mobility. The facility failed to ensure residents #51 and #101 wore splint devices according to their plan of care. Findings: Resident #51 Review of resident #51's medical record revealed a diagnosis of, but not limited to, Cardiovascular Accident; Traumatic brain injury; protein calorie malnutrition, Dysphagia, Unspecified convulsions Review of resident #51's May 2005 Physicians Orders revealed an order for Occupational Therapy to treat 3 times a week for 4 weeks for range of motion, simple reaching with left upper extremity splinting and restorative nurse program education. Review of resident #51's Occupational Therapy's Evaluation and Plan of Treatment revealed the following; Current Referral: Occupational Therapy to address splinting needs on left upper extremity and right hand. Objective Progress/Short-Term Goal: Patient will tolerate 2 hours of wearing L extension splint with no redness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was revised for 1 (#51) of 3 (#51, #94, #133) residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility failed to ensure resident #51's plan of care was revised to reflect new onset seizures. Findings: Review of resident #51's nurses notes dated 3/9/22 revealed resident #51 was transferred to a local hospital due to being found unresponsive with hands clinched and in an altered mental state. Review of resident #51's nurses notes dated 3/10/2022 revealed the facility was notified of resident #51's diagnosis of Recurrent Seizures via a phone call from a local hospital. Further review revealed resident #51 returned to the facility on 3/11/2022. Review of resident #51's hospital records from a local hospital revealed the following: [AGE] year old nursing home patient with .and new onset seizures continue Keppra for new onset seizures, to return to the nursing home on tomorrow. Review of resident #51's Comprehensive Plan of Care failed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal hygiene for 3 (#95, #101, #234) of 3 (#95, #101, #234) residents observed for ADL care in a total sample of 49 residents. The facility failed to (1) ensure Resident # 101 and Resident #234's fingernails were trimmed and clean, and (2) Resident #95's face was clean. Findings: Resident #101 Review of resident #101's medical record revealed a diagnosis of but not limited to, Multiple Schlerosis. Observation on 5/16/2022 at 8:30 am revealed resident 101 had long dirty finger nails on his right hand with a dark brown substance underneath nail beds. Observation on 5/18/2022 at 8:50 am with S10 LPN revealed resident 101 had long dirty finger nails on his right hand with a dark brown substance underneath nail beds Review of resident #101's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed resident #101 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided for 1 (#72) of 5 (#61, #67, #72, #119, #233) residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to conduct an elopement assessment utilizing the Wander Data Collection Tool each quarter for Resident #72, as per facility policy. Findings: Review of the facility's Wanderer Management, Monitoring System & Resident Elopement Protocol revealed: Purpose -To monitor safety of residents at risk for elopement. -To provide a system to alert staff that a resident may be attempting to leave the facility. Policy -It is the policy of this facility that all residents are afforded adequate supervision to provide the safest environment possible. . Procedures Identification & Prevention of Elopement 1. Elopement risk is determined by use of the Wander Data collection tool. The assessment should also include review of the resident's medical and social history. The Wander Data collection tool is to be completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident being fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services by failing to label a resident's feeding bag properly according to facility policy for 2 (#21, #55) of 2 (#21, #55) resident's reviewed for tube feeding. Findings: Review of Facility Policy Enteral tube feeding via continuous pump revealed in part: -Initiate Feeding: --5. ON the formula label document initials, date and time the formula was hung/administered, and initial that the label was checked against the order. Resident #21: Observation on 5/16/22 at 11:30 am revealed resident #21's Isosource enteral feeding infusing per pump at 60 milliliters per hour. Further observation of the Isosource feeding bag label failed to reveal documentation of the initials of the nurse that hung/administered the feeding. Resident #21's medical record revealed an admit date of 2/17/2022 with diagnoses that included, in part, cardiac arrest, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, convulsions, cerebral edema, gastrostomy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by: 1.) Having food items in the dry pantry that were not labeled with date when opened. 2.) Having food items in the dry pantry that contained insects. 3.) Failing to ensure dishwasher was in proper working order through temperature/chemical check. This had the potential to affect 89 resident who received trays out of the kitchen as per S11 Dietary Manager. Findings: 1.) Review of Food Receiving and Storage policy revealed: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Policy and Interpretation . 7. Dry foods that are stored in bins will be removed from original packaging, labeled and dated (use by date). Such foods will be rotated using a first in -first out system. Observation of dry storage area on 5/16/2022 at 9:15am revealed the following items were open and not labeled with any date: -Large rolling metal bin filled approximately 1/4 full with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXION HEALTH — 51 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
The other 50 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bay Ridge Healthcare CenterLa Porte, TX 1 of 5Claiborne Healthcare CenterShreveport, LA 1 of 5Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCorinth, MS 1 of 5Crystal Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGreenwood, MS 1 of 5Duncanville Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterDuncanville, TX 1 of 5Flatonia Healthcare CenterFlatonia, TX 1 of 5Gonzales Healthcare CenterGonzales, LA 1 of 5Green Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Grenada Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGrenada, MS 1 of 5Holly Springs Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHolly Springs, MS 1 of 5Indianola Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterIndianola, MS 1 of 5Lily Springs Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterLampasas, TX 1 of 5New Iberia Manor SouthNew Iberia, LA 1 of 5Patterson Healthcare CenterPatterson, LA 1 of 5Picayune Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPicayune, MS 1 of 5Pierremont Healthcare CenterShreveport, LA 1 of 5Prairie Meadows Rehabilitation and Healthcare CentFloresville, TX 1 of 5The Bluffs Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterVicksburg, MS 1 of 5Village Creek Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterLumberton, TX 1 of 5Willow Park Rehabilitation Health Care CenterClifton, TX 1 of 5Woodlands Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterClinton, MS 1 of 5Yazoo City Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterYazoo City, MS 2 of 5Great Oaks Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterByhalia, MS 2 of 5Kaplan Healthcare CenterKaplan, LA 2 of 5Many Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterMany, LA 2 of 5New Iberia Manor NorthNew Iberia, LA 2 of 5North Star Ranch Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenBonham, TX 2 of 5Willow Park Rehabilitation And Care CenterWillow Park, TX 3 of 5Barton Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterAustin, TX 3 of 5Cedar Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterPilot Point, TX 3 of 5Columbia Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterColumbia, MS 3 of 5Cross Timbers Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterFlower Mound, TX 3 of 5Delta Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCleveland, MS 3 of 5Golden Creek Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterNavasota, TX 3 of 5Lakeview Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterWinnsboro, TX 3 of 5Lone Star Ranch Rehabilitation and Healthcare CentKingsville, TX 3 of 5Midwestern Healthcare CenterWichita Falls, TX 3 of 5Natchez Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterNatchez, MS 3 of 5Ridgecrest Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterForney, TX 4 of 5Arbor Hills Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterEagle Lake, TX

Showing 40 of 50; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NEXION HEALTH OF OHI INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/14/2005
NEXION HEALTH LEASING, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/15/2002
NEXION HEALTH, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/15/2002
BOLT, BRETTONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/15/2002
KIRLEY, FRANCISIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/15/2002
MYLES, REBECCAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/13/2014
HERDRICH, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2012
LEE, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2012
RINER, MEERAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$883K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 8%Other / private 12%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $883K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$345per resident / day
operating cost
$10,502per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$326per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195281. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next