Cedar Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
1700 N Washington St, Pilot Point, TX 76258 · For profit - Corporation · 108 certified beds · (940) 686-5556 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.3% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.1% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.4% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.2% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.3% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 77.8% | 88.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.3% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.7% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.86 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.97 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 9.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.4%CMS range 30.9–55.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.0–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 9.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 9.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 4.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 6.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.5%CMS range 5.0–13.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 81.7 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for three of eighteen residents (Resident #10, #37, and #81) reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Residents #10, #37, and #81's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents on 03/30/2026. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings included: Resident #10 Record review of Resident #10's Face Sheet, dated 04/01/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with cerebral infarction (insufficient oxygen in the brain causing stroke) and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #10's Comprehensive MDS Assessment (assessment used to determine functional capabilities and health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-01 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an activities program directed by a qualified professional who was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activity professional for 85 of 85 residents.The facility's Activity Director was not a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional that met state licensing requirements. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life due to lack of activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident.Findings Include: Record review on 04/01/2026 at 9:00 AM, of the facility's Administrative and other licensed professional staff licensure audit, revealed the current Activity Director was not certified. Documents provided for the Activity Director included training certificates confirming the AD completed 3.5 hours of CEUs through Lifetime Wellness that were pre-approved NCCAP for Activity Directors and 7 hours of CEUs through [Employer] that were a 4-part series on Dementia Training over the last 12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for five of eighteen residents (Residents #1, #8, #18, #41, and #66) reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have a tube of zinc oxide inside his room on 03/30/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 did not have a tube of zinc oxide and topical antibiotic ointment inside his room on 03/30/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 did not have a tube of zinc oxide inside his room on 03/30/2026. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #41's eyedrops inside his room were not accessible to other residents on 03/30/2026. 5. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #66 did not have a tube of topical pain relief gel inside the room on 03/03/2026. These failures could place the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food storage, labeling, and dating. The facility failed to ensure all food items in the facility's kitchen were dated and discarded prior to their use-by date, were properly sealed, and failed to ensure the main ice machine was free of a brownish and blackish substance. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness. Finding included: During observation on 03/30/2026 between 9:10 AM and 9:45 AM in the facility's kitchen revealed: One large bag of marshmallows dated 03/19/26 with no visible expiration date. One large bag of crispy fried onions dated 03/10/26 with a use by date of 03/15/26. One large bag of graham crumbs dated 12/27/25 with no visible expiration date. One gallon bag of cherry cake mix not properly sealed and exposed to air contaminants. One…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four of eighteen residents (Resident #5, #46, #67, and #82) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA F performed hand hygiene before assisting the ADON on Resident #5's wound care on 04/01/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA D sanitized the blood pressure cuff while administering medications to Residents #46 and Resident #67 on 03/31/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA E performed hand hygiene and changed his gloves during Resident #82's incontinent care on 03/30/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 04/01/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with wounds received care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent further development of skin breakdown and infection for one of four residents (Resident #5) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure that the interim ADON did not clean Resident #5's wound with the gauze used to clean the surrounding skin of the wound on 04/01/2026. This failure could place the residents with wounds at risk of infection.Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 04/01/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with skin transplant (a surgical procedure that involves taking healthy skin and moving it to cover damaged skin) status. Record review of Resident #5's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 01/23/2026, reflected that the resident had a moderate impairment (resident may need…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' environment remained free of hazards as was possible for one of five direct staff (LVN C) reviewed for accident hazard. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN C did not leave a container of germicidal wipes on top of her cart unattended on 03/30/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure there were no germicidal wipes on the ledge of the nurse's station, unattended, on 03/30/2026. These failures could prevent the residents from having an environment that was free from toxic chemicals. Finding included: 1. During an observation on 03/30/2026 at 1:05 p.m. LVN C went inside a resident's room to administer medications. She closed the door while administering medications. She left a container of germicidal wipes (substance that destroys germs and microorganism) on top of a cart, unattended, until she finished administering medications. 2. During an observation on 03/30/2026 at 1:26 p.m. a container of germicidal wipes was observed sitting at the nurse's station ledge. It was observed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infection for one of five residents (Resident #82) reviewed for incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure that CNA E performed the right technique during Resident #82's incontinent care on 03/30/2026. This failure could place the residents at risk of urinary tract infection.Findings included: Record review of Resident #82's Face Sheet, dated 04/01/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). Record review of Resident #82's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 03/13/2026, reflected the resident had moderate impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 10. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment indicated that the resident was frequently incontinent for bladder and bowel. Record review of Resident #82's Comprehensive Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals that met the needs of each resident for two of eighteen residents (Resident #33 and Resident #46) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure LVN I did not leave Resident #33 and Resident #46's medications inside the cart on 03/31/2026, instead of administering their medications to them. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered resulting in adverse effects such as worsening conditions and inadequate disease control.Findings included: Resident #33 Record review of Resident #33's Face Sheet, dated 04/01/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with hypothyroidism (the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormones resulting in fatigue). Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's oxygen tubing (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) and nebulizer mouthpiece (device used to deliver medication in a mist form through the mouth) was properly stored when not in use on 09/30/2025.This failure could place residents at risk of respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 09/30/2025, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and COPD (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan was updated to reflect a left heel wound on 06/01/2025. These failures could place the residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services needed. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 06/18/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility 04/29/2025 and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease stage 3 (kidneys do not function properly), heart failure (heart does not pump effectively), and pneumonia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's history of falls were care planned. This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services needed. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 04/30/25, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and dizziness. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/15/25, reflected she had a BIMS score of 10 (moderate impairment). Resident required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for three (Resident #29, Resident #73, and Resident #82) of eighteen residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #29, Resident #73, and Resident #82's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the resident on 01/14/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Resident #29 Review of Resident #29's Face Sheet, dated 01/16/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #29 was diagnosed with muscle weakness and gait abnormalities. Review of Resident #29's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 12/24/2024, reflected the resident had a severe impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 00. The Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 6 (Rooms #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6) of 10 resident rooms and the hallway floors reviewed for cleanliness and sanitization. The facility failed to ensure that Resident Rooms #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life. Findings included: An observation on 01/14/25 at 10:35 AM of the Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the air condition unit had vents filled with black and brown dirt-like debris. An observation on 01/14/25 at 10:39 AM of the Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the air condition unit had vents filled with black and brown dirt-like debris. The bottom of the bedside table had red stains on it. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' bed was free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience for 4 (Resident #1, #5, #25, and #29) of 5 residents reviewed for physical restraints, The facility failed to obtain physician orders or a physician assessment as of 01/16/25 for Residents #1, #5, #25, and #29, for the usage of a scoop mattress prior to installing the mattress to assist in fall prevention. This failure could prevent residents from having an environment that was free from any physical or chemical restraints. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 01/16/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included restlessness and irritation, and cerebral palsy (movement disorder). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reflected, he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for three (Resident #36, Resident #68, and Resident #79) of fifteen residents reviewed for Care Plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36's care plan for catheter, dated 12/17/2024, had appropriate interventions. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #68's care plan for catheter, dated 10/02/2024, had appropriate interventions. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #79's care plan for catheter, dated 01/09/2025, had appropriate interventions. These failures could place the residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services needed. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #36's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 4 (Resident #16, #28, #40, and #38) of 14 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's breathing mask for her nebulizer (machine that turns liquid medication into a mist breathed directly into the lungs) was properly stored when not in use on 01/14/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #28's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) was properly stored when not in use on 01/14/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #40's nasal cannula was properly stored when not in use on 01/14/2025. 4. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #38's nebulizer mask (medication is inhaled through) was properly stored when not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food storage, labeling, dating, and kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure staff were wearing the appropriate hair and beard coverings. 2. The facility failed to ensure the food stored in the refrigerator and freezer were labeled with the date the product was received from the vendor. 3. The facility failed to ensure that the sugar and flour bins were cleaned. 4. The facility failed to ensure the ice scoop in the facility kitchen was cleaned. 5. The facility failed to ensure the food in the dry storage area was labeled with the product was received from the vendor. 6. The facility failed to ensure the food stored in the freezer was properly sealed from air-borne contaminants. 7. The facility failed to ensure foods being transported to resident rooms and the memory care unit were properly concealed from air-borne contaminants.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each residents environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible for 1 (Resident #30) of 9 residents reviewed for environmental hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30 did not have pointed scissors in his room on 01/14/2024. This failure could place the resident and other residents who came into the room at risk for injury. Review of Resident #30's Face Sheet, dated 01/16/25, reflected that resident was an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE]. Resident #30 had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following other cerebrovascular disease (condition that impacts blood vessels in the brain). Review of Resident #30's Quarterly MDS (tool to assess health and functional capabilities) Assessment, dated 01/13/2025, reflected that Resident #30 had impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 11. Section I did not reflect dementia or a mood disorder. Section I reflected Resident #30 had cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #36 and Resident #39) of eight residents reviewed for Infection Control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A and CNA B changed their gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #36 on 01/14/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA B performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #39 on 01/14/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #36's Face Sheet, dated 01/16/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #36 was diagnosed with personal history of urinary tract infections and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure confidential and personal medical records for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of two residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN A would close, lock, or minimize her laptop's monitor while administering medications to Resident #1 on 12/17/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN A would close, lock, or minimize her laptop's monitor while providing wound care to Resident #2 on 12/17/2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of exposure of their personal and medical information to unauthorized individuals which could cause a loss of dignity. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 12/17/2024, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was diagnosed with neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a form of dementia) and hypertension. In an observation on 12/17/2024 at 9:30 PM revealed RN A was passing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one cart (wound care cart) of five carts observed was kept locked or under direct observation of authorized staff in an area where residents could access it. The facility failed to ensure that RN A locked her wound care cart before providing wound care on 12/17/2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of accessing/opening the cart causing accidental overdose or misuse of medications. Findings included: Observation on 12/17/2024 at 11:17 AM revealed RN A was about to perform wound care. She prepared the things needed and went inside the resident's room. She left the wound care cart unlocked. The drawers of the wound care cart were facing the hallway. The drawers contained different types of dressings, different sizes of dressings, wound cleansers, normal saline, ointments, gauze pads, bandages, tongue depressors, and tape measures. In an interview with RN A at 11:31 AM, RN A stated the cart should not be left open everytime care was provided. She said she forgot to lock her cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for Infection Control. The facility failed to ensure that CNA B changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #3 on 12/17/2024. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 12/17/2024, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #3 was diagnosed with chronic kidney disease. Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 12/01/2024, reflected the resident had a moderate impairment in cognition with BIMS score of 08. Resident #3's Comprehensive MDS Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-30 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to employ a certified Dietary Manager or a qualified fulltime dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional for the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager met all required state guidelines or employed a full-time dietician, who also assisted in managing the facility kitchen's daily food and nutrition services. This failure could impact a resident's ability to receive acceptable and appropriated food and nutrition services. Findings include: Record review of the facility's documents for a Qualified Dietary Manager revealed the Dietary Manager had not completed qualified certification course that met the requirement of a qualified nutrition professional . The Dietary Manager and facility produced a college enrollment form for the Dietary Manager courses starting from 03/15/23 and completing on 06/20/24. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 11/30/23 at 02:05 PM, she stated she was a cook at the facility before being promoted to the Dietary Manager in March 2023. She stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for areas in the facility for 13 (Resident #'s 1, 4, 7, 10, 11, 18, 19, 22, 37, 43, 54, 59, and 69) of 27 resident rooms observed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #'s 1, 4, 7, 10, 11, 18, 19, 22, 37, 43, 54, 59, and 69's rooms were cleaned, sanitized, and maintained. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of infections and living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life. Findings included : Observation of Residents #37 and #54's room on 11/28/23 at 11:09 AM revealed the windowsill had a lot of dead gnat (too numerous to count) on the ledge on the windowsill. The top of the air-conditioned unit had dead gnats and dirt particles along the vents. The bathroom had a bag of trash sitting near a trash can and a bag of wipes were lying on the floor near the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure foods in the facility's dry storage area, refrigerators, and freezer were labeled ( labeled identifying items in the container) and dated ( the use by date was not documented) according to guidelines and in a sanitary manner. The facility failed to ensure damaged foods were discarded according to guidelines. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses. Findings included: Observations on 11/28/23 from 09:15 AM to 09:25 AM in the facility's only kitchen revealed: Six individually wrapped ham and cheese sandwiches were undated in the refrigerator. Five large pitchers of juices were unlabeled and undated in the refrigerator. One large, long tube of ground beef, in its original packaging, in the refrigerator and was undated . Seven small bowls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to obtain from hospice the most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient needs for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #59) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #59's hospice care was care planned. This failure could place residents at risk of needs not being met. Findings include : Record review of Resident #59's Face Sheet, dated 11/30/23, revealed he was a 93 -year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and Rheumatic Tricuspid Insufficiency (heart valve complications ). Record review of Resident #59's records in the facility's system of records indicated the resident was moved to hospice services on 10/12/23 . Review of Resident #59's Comprehensive Care Plan revised on 08/24/2023 reflected no care plan for hospice care. Interview on 11/30/23 at 11:45 AM with Social Services, she stated she that it was primarily the MDS Nurse's responsibility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #20 and Resident #39) of 4 residents reviewed for incontinence care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA B performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #20. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA C performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #39. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination resulting in infections. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's MDS assessment, dated 09/14/23, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her cognitive status was severely impaired. She was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. Her diagnoses included diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. An observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carryout activities of daily living received services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to provide Residents #8 with routine showers. These failures could place residents at risk for and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #8's MDS assessment, dated 10/03/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her cognitive status was moderately impaired. Her diagnoses included heart failure, renal failure, diabetes, seizure disorder, obesity. Section G of the MDS which described care required for bathing was not completed. Record review of Resident #8's Care Plan, dated 07/09/22, reflected: The resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, impaired balance, and limited mobility. Facility interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from accident and hazards to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #10) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents free of hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 had a smoking assessment completed since admission to the facility on [DATE]. This failure placed the residents at risk of accidents and hazards. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #10's Face Sheet, dated 11/30/23, revealed she was an 89 -year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included muscle wasting and atrophy, mild cognitive impairment, and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #10's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident's BIM was 05 (Severe Cognitive Impairment). Record Review of the Resident #10's Care Plan dated 10/23/23 revealed the resident was care planned for being a smoker and an intervention included evaluating the resident for safe smoking. Record review on 11/29/30 for Resident #10's smoking assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for nutrition and hydration. The facility failed to assess Residents #13's weight on a weekly basis per the resident's care plan and the resident experienced an 11% weight loss in a 3-month period. This failure could place resident at risk of experiencing a decline in health due to malnutrition. Findings included: Review of Resident #13's MDS assessment, dated 10/13/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her cognitive status was severely impaired. The resident's diagnoses included anemia, osteoporosis, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and malnutrition. Her weight was 78 pounds and 63 inches tall. The resident was on a pureed diet. Record review of Resident #13's Care plan, revised 07/27/22, reflected the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 (Residents #2) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL's. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was getting assistance with changing her brief and catheter care as needed. This failure had the potential to affect residents by placing them at risk for skin breakdown and a decline in their quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's MDS assessment, dated 08/22/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old-female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her cognitive status was moderately impaired. Her diagnoses included morbid obesity and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. She was always incontinent of bladder and bowel and had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #2's Physician's Orders, dated 09/13/23 reflected a new order (following Surveyor intervention) was written for: Change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for one (Resident #1) of three residents observed for infection control. CNA A failed to ensure Resident #1's Foley catheter did not pull or hang from the resident during incontinence care. This failure could place residents at risk for infection and or trauma at the catheter site. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected he was admitted on [DATE]. He was 72 years' old. He had a diagnosis of stroke. The resident was incontinent of urine and stool and had an indwelling catheter . An interview and observation on 09/13/23 at 11:55 AM with Resident #1 revealed he was lying in bed with his blanket pulled back. He was alert and able to answer questions. He was wearing a brief and was incontinent of a large amount of stool that was spilling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #1) of three residents observed for infection control. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene and glove changes while providing incontinence care to Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for spread of infection through cross-contamination. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected he was admitted on [DATE]. He was 72 years' old. He had a diagnosis of stroke. An interview and observation on 09/13/23 at 11:55 AM with Resident #1 revealed he was lying in bed with his blanket pulled back. He was alert and able to answer questions. He was wearing a brief and was incontinent of a large amount of stool that was spilling from his brief. He said he was waiting for staff to come…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NEXION HEALTH — 51 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 50 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 50; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEXION HEALTH OF OHI INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 10/08/2020 |
| NEXION HEALTH LEASING, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/08/2020 |
| NEXION HEALTH, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/08/2020 |
| BOLT, BRETTON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/08/2020 |
| KIRLEY, FRANCIS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/08/2020 |
| ROWAN, TERRY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/01/2020 |
| HERDRICH, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/08/2020 |
| REID, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/08/2020 |
| RINER, MEERA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/08/2020 |
| FALLON, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/08/2020 |
| LEE, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/08/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $410K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455930. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.