No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Care One At Brookline

99 Park Street, Brookline, MA 02146 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (978) 935-3525 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (978) 935-3525 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
(617) 731-1050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
99 Harvard St · (617) 731-4536 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1426 Beacon St · (617) 879-9980 · Call to confirm hours
Park
BROO-34 166 0100 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.6%16.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.1%15.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%3.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.8%15.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.1%19.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.8%94.8%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.0%21.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.5%21.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine36.7%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.1%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.2%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.181.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.201.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 282 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.56U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 157 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.1%CMS range 58.0–72.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 9.6–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting94.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.9–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
34.2%
Total nursing turnover
64.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 97.6 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-18)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a dignified existence for four Residents (#4, #20, #116 and #6) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically,For Residents #4 and #20 the facility failed to maintain a dignified experience during meals by leaving the tray in front of the Resident for an extended period of time before providing assistance and standing over the Resident while assisting with the meal.For Resident #116 the facility failed to ensure that the Resident's chest was not visible from the hallway.For Resident #6 the facility failed to ensure that the Resident's privacy was maintained when their brief was visible from the hallway.Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Dignity, dated as revised February 2021, indicated the following:-Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self- worth and self- esteem.-Residents are treated with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for three Residents (#88, #68 and #14) out of sample of 25 residents. Specifically,For Resident #88 the facility failed to properly label and store respiratory supplies and failed to administered oxygen as per the physician's orders.For Resident #68 and Resident #14 the facility failed to properly label and store respiratory supplies.Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated as revised October 2010, indicated the following: -Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders for facility protocol for oxygen administration. 1. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of Resident #88's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/11/25, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13 out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were secured on two out of three Resident units. Specifically, medication carts were unlocked on the first floor and second floor. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage dated revised February 2023 indicated that compartments (including but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts and boxes) containing medications and biologicals are locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items are not left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. 1. On 12/16/25 at 7:00 A.M., the surveyors observed two medication carts on the first-floor unit unlocked, and no nurses present within eyesight of the medication carts. 2. On 12/16/25 at 3:27 P.M., the surveyor observed an unlocked medication cart on the second-floor unit. The surveyor also observed other staff members and residents in the hall in close proximity to the unlocked medication cart. The surveyor then observed Nurse #1 enter the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment during dining on one of three Resident units. Specifically, on the second-floor unit, residents were observed eating meals on meal trays in the dining room.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Homelike Environment, dated revised February 2021, failed to indicate that meals are served in a homelike manner. On 12/16/25 at 8:45 A.M., the surveyor observed 4 out 4 residents in the second-floor dining room eating breakfast served on trays. On 12/16/25 at 1:10 P.M., the surveyor observed 3 out of 4 residents in the second-floor dining room eating lunch served on trays. On 12/17/25 at 8:55 A.M., the surveyor observed 4 out of 4 residents in the second-floor dining room eating breakfast served on trays. On 12/17/25 at 12:57 P.M., the surveyor observed 4 out of 4 residents in the second-floor dining room eating lunch served on trays. One resident was being assisted by staff On 12/18/25 at 8:47 A.M. the surveyor observed 3 out of 3 residents in the second-floor dining room eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a care plan for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, for Resident #2, the facility failed to implement a care plan for a knee immobilizer.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated revised March 2022 indicated that the care plan describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses including non-displaced fracture of the right tibial tuberosity, brain cancer and malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 is severely cognitively impaired and totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Review of the physician's orders dated December 2025 indicted an order dated to start 11/12/25 for Right Knee Immobilizer: Check skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to address recommendations from the dialysis center. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the physician of dialysis recommendations for one Resident #10 out of a sample of 25 Residents.Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Hemodialysis Pre and Post Care' with a revision date of March 2010 indicated the following:-Residents will receive appropriate care and monitoring pre and post dialysis.-To assist the residents/patient in maintaining homeostasis pre and post hemodialysis.-Document all communications in the hemodialysis communication progress note or Dialysis center communication book.-Ensure ongoing communication with dialysis center staff.Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in July 2017 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis.A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 0/15 indicating severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for three Residents (#14, #10 and #2) out of a total sample of 25 Residents. Specifically,For Resident #14, the medical record failed to accurately indicate necessary care to be provided to a tracheostomy tube.For Resident #10, the facility failed to accurately document blood pressure taken.For Resident #2 the facility failed to a. document accurately for the application of a knee brace and, b. accurately document a treatment.Findings include: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, chronic respiratory failure and dysphagia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/2/25, indicated the Resident could not participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam and was assessed by staff as having severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated the resident required suctioning and tracheostomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that concerns addressed by the Resident Council Group had sufficient follow-up to address and prevent recurrence. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Resident Council, dated as revised February 2021, indicated the facility supports residents' rights to organize and participate in the resident council. 1. The purpose of the resident council is to provide a forum for: a. residents, families, and resident representatives to have input in the operation of the facility; b. discussion of concerns and suggestions for improvement; c. consensus building and communication between residents and facility staff; and d. disseminating information and gathering feedback from interested residents. 6. A Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. The facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the items of concern. Review of the facility policy, Menus, undated, indicated that menus are developed and prepared to meet resident choices including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident protected health information (PHI) was secure and not visible to others on two of three nursing units. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy, dated February 2022, indicated the facility will protect and safeguard resident confidentiality and personal privacy. On 11/19/24 at 6:58 A.M., the surveyor observed the computer screen on a medication cart on the first floor. There was no nurse in the area and the computer screen was open displaying various residents' names, photos and identifying information. On 11/19/24 at 8:32 A.M., the surveyor observed the computer screen on a medication cart on the second floor. There was no nurse in the area and the computer screen was open displaying various residents' names, photos and identifying information. On 11/20/24 at 7:06 A.M., the surveyor observed the computer screen on a medication cart on the first floor. There was no nurse in the area and the computer screen was open displaying various…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for 5 Residents (#55, #87, #4, #252, #13) out of a total of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #55, the facility failed to implement a physician's order to offload heels and to apply waffle boots. 2. For Resident #87, the facility failed to obtain weights as ordered. 3. For Resident #4, the facility failed to ensure nursing implemented a physician's order for weights and failed to document those weights in the electronic health record. 4. For Resident #252, the facility failed to ensure physicians orders were implemented for the monitoring of a peripheral intravenous (IV) site. 5. For Resident 13, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for the care of a central line. Findings include: Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2018, indicated the following: - The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when three out of three nurses observed made seven errors out of 30 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 23.33%. Those errors impacted three Residents (#15, 22 and #48), out of three residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Oral Medications dated revised October 2010 indicated that; #6: Check the label on the medication and confirm the medication name and dose with the MAR (medication administration record). #8 Check the medication dose. Re-check to confirm the proper dose. 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with diagnoses including cancer, muscle weakness and anxiety disorder. On 11/20/24 at 8:48 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #6 give Resident # 15 the following medications: Omeprazole 20 mg (milligrams) 1 tablet Amlodipine 5 mg 2 tablets Refresh eye drops 1 drop each eye. Fluticasone nasal spray one spray each nostril Dairy aid 1 tablet Metoprolol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly secured. Specifically: 1. The facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended on medication carts, at nurses' stations and in resident rooms. 2. The facility failed to ensure a medication cart was locked when unattended on the 3rd floor. 3. The facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the bedside for Resident #4. 4. The failed to ensure medications were labeled with date opened. 5. The failed to ensure medications were not left unattended on top if the medication cart. 6. For Resident #201, the facility failed to ensure medication was not stored at bedside. Findings include: Review of the facility's Medication Labeling and Storage policy, dated February 2023, indicated: The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity and light controls. Only authorized personnel have access to keys. Compartments (including but not limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately document in the clinical records for 4 residents (#30, #67, #77 and #1) of 24 sampled residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #30, the facility failed to document diabetic foot care. 2. For Resident #67, the facility inaccurately documented O2 (oxygen) tubing changed when it was not. 3. For Resident #77, the facility inaccurately documented a hand splint/brace was on when it was not. 4. For Resident #1, the facility failed to ensure staff documented the administration of medications. Review of the Documentation of Medication Administration policy dated November 2022 indicated: A medication administration record is used to document all medications administered. Documentation of medication administration includes . date and time of administration, reason(s) why a medication was withheld, not administered, or refused (as applicable); initials, signature and title of the person administering the medication. Review of the facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#201) did not self-administer medications out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, Resident #201 was not assessed to be able to safely self-administer medication. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Self Administration of Medications, dated as reviewed February 2021, indicated that as part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate. Resident #201 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder and depression. On 11/19/24 at 8:08 A.M., and 12:30 P.M. the surveyor observed a bottle of Motrin B on Resident #201's over the bed table. During an interview on 11/20/24 11:15 A.M., Resident #201 said that he/she put the bottle of Motrin in his/her backpack. Review of the medical record failed to indicate Resident #201 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and implemented a baseline care plan for one Resident (#201) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission, which included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care to the resident which meet professional standards of quality care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans - Baseline, dated revised March 2022 indicated that a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight hours of admission. Resident #201 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), spinal abscess with drains in the back and intravenous antibiotic use. Review of the medical record failed to indicate a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission to the facility. Further review indicated that as of 5 days post…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to implement resident-centered care plans for one Resident (#77) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, for Resident #77 the facility failed to implement the use of a hand brace and failed to assist with trimming fingernails. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016 indicated that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Resident #77 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including stroke with left sided hemiplegia/hemiparesis, diabetes and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated a score of 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating intact cognition. Further review indicated that Resident #77 is totally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team for one Resident (#14) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated as revised December 2016 indicated the Interdisciplinary Team must review and update the care plan: d. At least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, anxiety disorder and depression. Review of Resident #14's clinical record indicated an MDS was completed on 10/22/24. Review of Resident #4's most recent care plan indicated a target date of 10/16/24. Further review indicated the care plan was not reviewed and had not been reviewed since 7/30/24, and target dates for all goals had not been updated . During an interview on 11/20/24 at 8:14 A.M., the Director of Nursing said that care plans are to be reviewed each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 3 dependent Residents (#14, #77 and #15) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #14, cut fingernails and remove unwanted chin hair. 2. For Resident #77, cut fingernails. 3. For Resident #15, remove unwanted chin hair. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting and dated revised March 2018 indicated that residents that are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, anxiety disorder and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #14 scored an 8 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a meaningful activity program for one Resident (#44) out of a total of 24 sampled residents Findings include: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of frontal lobe and aphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #44 is severely cognitively impaired and requires assistance with bathing, dressing and transfers. During an interview on 11/19/24 at 10:20 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #44 resting in bed. Family Member #1 said that she visits Resident #44 regularly and that Resident #44 is confused and bedbound. Family Member #1 said that she has not seen staff offer Resident #44 in room activities, turn his/her TV on or play music for him/her. Review of Resident #44's Activities Care Plan, dated 6/13/24, indicated: Focus: Resident experiences barriers to activities, especially communication and language barriers. Due to brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#67) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen filter was clean and the oxygen tubing changed as ordered. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration and dated revised October 2010 failed to indicate how often the oxygen tubing was to be replaced and how often the concentrator filter was to be cleaned. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, and kidney disease. On 11/19/24 at 8:38 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #67 lying in bed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula, attached to an oxygen concentrator. The surveyor observed the oxygen tubing to be dated 10/11/24. The surveyor also observed the concentrator filter to be covered with a gray fuzzy substance. Review of the doctor's orders indicated an order dated 10/26/22 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#4) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, for Resident #4 the facility failed to administer the correct dose of a lidocaine patch (topical pain patch that comes in different strengths) and apply the lidocaine patch to the correct location. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Pain Assessment and Management, dated as revised October 2022, indicated the purpose is to help staff identify pain in the resident, and develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and that address the underlying causes of pain. * Implementing Pain Management Strategies 5. The following are considered when establishing the medication regimen: a. Starting with lower doses and titrating upward as necessary; 6. The medication regimen is implemented as ordered. Results of the interventions are documented and communicated directly to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed develop a trauma-informed care plan to address the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for one Resident (#201) of 24 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Trauma Informed Care and Culturally Competent Care dated revised August 2022 indicated that individualized care plans are developed that address past trauma in collaboration with the resident and family as appropriate. Further review indicated to identify and decrease exposure to triggers that may retraumatize the resident. Resident #201 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), spinal abscesses with drains in the back and intravenous antibiotic use. Review of the medical record failed to indicate a baseline care plan for PTSD was developed within 48 hours of admission to the facility. Further review indicated that as of 5 days post admission, a baseline plan of care for PTSD had not been developed. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review the consultant pharmacist's recommendations for the monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) for one Resident (#4), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff and the physician reviewed the consultant pharmacist's recommendations for Resident #4 from 9/23/24 and 10/25/24. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Medication Regime Reviews, dated as revised May 2019, indicated the consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly. 8. Within 24 hours of the MRR, the consultant pharmacist provides a written report to the attending physicians for each resident identified as having a non-life threatening medication irregularity. The report contains: a. the resident's name; b. the name of the medication; c. the identified irregularity; and d. the pharmacist's recommendation. 11. If the physician does not provide a timely or adequate response, or the consultant pharmacist identifies that no action has been taken, he/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow infection control practices to prevent possible spread of infection by failing to follow infection control practices during medication pass. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Oral Medications, dated revised October 2010 indicated that for tablets or capsules from a bottle pour the desired number into the bottle cap and transfer to the medication cup. Do not touch the medications with your hands. For unit dose tablets or capsules place the packaged medications directly into the medication cup. During medication pass on 11/20/24, at 9:48 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #4 pour 5 out of 7 unit dose medications into her hand before transferring each one into a medication cup, potentially contaminating the poured medications. The surveyor also observed Nurse #4 pour 5 out of 5 medications from different bottles into her bare hand, placing some into medication cups, and returning the unused medications to the bottles, potentially contaminating these 5 bottles of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#285) received care in accordance with professional standards of practice, out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing reconciled and transcribed medications from Resident #285's hospital discharge summary accurately. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Reconciliation, dated as revised 12/11/14, indicated the Center will accurately reconcile medications of newly admitted residents to contribute to the creation of an accurate master medication list. The purpose of this policy is to: -Describe the process for creating the most accurate list possible of all medications a newly admitted patient or resident is taking -Provide correct medications to the patient or resident after transitioning to the Center's care. General Information: -Prescribing errors may occur when a patient is admitted to the hospital or transferred across the continuum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for one Resident (#2) out of a sample of 19 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide mouth care resulting in thrush on the Resident's tongue. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, 'Mouth Care', with a revision date of February 2018, indicated the following: *The purpose of this procedure is to keep the resident's lips and oral tissues moist, to cleanse and freshen the resident's mouth, and to prevent oral infection. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in September 2019 with diagnoses including dysphagia. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of a possible 15 indicating severe impairment. A review of the Resident's November physician's orders indicated the following: *NPO (Nothing by Mouth) diet, NPO texture and NPO consistency *Enteral feed every 6 hours for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure quality care was provided for 1 Resident (#29) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was in place for a resident's wound treatment. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Skin Tears-Abrasions and Minor Breaks, Care of, dated September 2013, indicated the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to guide the prevention and treatment of abrasions, skin tears, and minor breaks in the skin. -Obtain a physician's order as needed. Document physician notification in medical record. -Review the resident's care plan, current orders, and diagnosis to determine resident needs. -Check the treatment record. -Complete in-house investigation of causation. -When an abrasion/skin tear/bruise is discovered, complete a Report of Incident/Accident. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 and had diagnoses that included Type II Diabetes with Diabetic Neuropathy. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to obtain consent to receive vision services resulting in the Resident not receiving vision services since admission for one Resident (#5) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Physician Orders for Consultation, dated and revised 1/5/22, indicated the following: The purpose of this policy is to: *Ensure that consultations for specialty care or ancillary services (including podiatry, dental, optometry, audiology and physiatry services) are ordered by the attending physician to meet the medical or clinical care needs of each patient. Process: *The interdisciplinary team (including the attending physician, nurses, therapists, and social workers) will identify the need for consultative services. *The attending physician or designated practitioner will order consultative services when necessary to meet individualized medical and clinical needs of the resident. *The center will assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) was flushed in accordance of professional standards of practice for one Resident (#285) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #285, the facility failed to ensure nursing obtained physician's orders for routine flushes. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled, Central Line Catheter Flushing, dated June 2016, indicated to maintain patency of the central venous access device (CVAD). VII. To maintain the patency of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC); the catheter will be flushed every 8 hours or once per shift with 10 milliliters (ml) 0.9% preservative-free sodium chloride flush followed by 5 ml heparin 10 units/mI flush, unless closed ended or valve catheter then only 10 ml 0.9% preservative-free sodium chloride flush every 8 hours or once per shift is required to maintain patency. A. Verify physician's orders. M. Document on IV medication administration record (MAR) and/or resident's medical record. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services met the needs of each resident for one Resident (#285) in a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #285 who was admitted to the facility with clostridium difficile (infection that causes diarrhea and inflammation of the colon) and required an antibiotic medication (fidaxomicin), the facility failed to ensure they obtained his/her physician ordered antibiotic medication, as a result Resident #285 was not administered the antibiotic as ordered, and he/she missed 5 doses. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Unavailable Medications, dated February 2019, indicated medications used by residents in the nursing facility may be unavailable for dispensing from the pharmacy on occasion. This situation may be due to the pharmacy being temporarily out of stock of a particular product, a drug recall, manufacturer's shortage of an ingredient, or the situation may be permanent because the drug is no longer being made. The facility must make every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to obtain consent to receive dental services resulting in the Resident not receiving dental services since admission for one Resident (#5) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services, dated and revised December 2016 indicated the following: *Routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with resident's assessment and plan of care. *Routine and 24-hour emergency dental services are provided to our residents through: a. a contract agreement with a licensed dentist that comes to the facility monthly b. Referral to the resident's personal dentist c. Referral to community dentists or d. Referral to other health care organizations that provide dental services *A list of community dentists available to provide dental services to our residents is posted at each nurses' station and the list is also available from Service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to transcribe a physician's order accurately for one Resident (#2) out of a sample of 19 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to accurately document the medication route of administration. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in September 2019 with diagnoses including dysphagia. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of a possible 15 indicating severe impairment. A review of the Resident's November physician's orders indicated the following: *NPO (Nothing by Mouth) diet, NPO texture and NPO consistency *Enteral feed every 6 hours for dysphagia *Diflucan (medication used to treat thrush) Oral Tablet 150 milligrams (mg), give 1 tablet by mouth in the evening. During an interview on 11/21/23 at 8:14 A.M., the Director of Nurses said Residents who are NPO should not have medication orders that read, administered by mouth. He expects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-11-22 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to post nurse staffing daily, as required. Findings include: During an observation on 11/20/23 at 7:05 A.M., the nurse staffing posted at the receptionist's desk was dated 10/30/23. During an interview on 11/22/23 at 8:06 A.M., the Facility Scheduler said staffing should be posted daily. During an interview on 11/22/23 at 8:03 A.M., the Administrator said staffing should be posted every day. The posted staffing should not be three weeks old.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 36 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Care One At MillburyMillbury, MA 1 of 5Care One At RandolphRandolph, MA 1 of 5Careone At OradellOradell, NJ 2 of 5Care One At NewtonNewton, MA 2 of 5Care One At RedstoneEast Longmeadow, MA 2 of 5Care One At WeymouthWeymouth, MA 2 of 5CareOne At Hanover TownshipWhippany, NJ 2 of 5Careone At MiddletownAtlantic Highlands, NJ 2 of 5Rehab & Nursing Ctr Greater PittsburghGreensburg, PA 3 of 5Care One At LexingtonLexington, MA 3 of 5Care One At LowellLowell, MA 3 of 5Care One At New BedfordNew Bedford, MA 3 of 5CareOne At Madison AvenueMorristown, NJ 3 of 5CareOne At MoorestownMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5CareOne at New MilfordNew Milford, NJ 3 of 5Careone At East BrunswickEast Brunswick, NJ 3 of 5Careone At Ridgewood AvenueParamus, NJ 3 of 5Careone At WellingtonHackensack, NJ 4 of 5Care One At ConcordW Concord, MA 4 of 5Care One At Essex ParkBeverly, MA 4 of 5Care One At NorthamptonNorthampton, MA 4 of 5CareOne At TeaneckTeaneck, NJ 4 of 5CareOne at The HighlandsEdison, NJ 4 of 5Careone At CresskillCresskill, NJ 4 of 5Careone At EveshamMarlton, NJ 4 of 5Careone At LivingstonLivingston, NJ 4 of 5Careone At ParsippanyParsippany Troy Hill, NJ 4 of 5Careone At Somerset ValleyBound Brook, NJ 5 of 5Care One At HolyokeHolyoke, MA 5 of 5Care One At PeabodyPeabody, MA 5 of 5Care One At WilmingtonWilmington, MA 5 of 5CareOne At WallWall, NJ 5 of 5Careone At HolmdelHolmdel, NJ 5 of 5Careone At ValleyWestwood, NJ 5 of 5Careone At WayneWayne, NJ 5 of 5River Glen Health Care CenterSouthbury, CT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THCI OF MASSACHUSETTS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2003
CARE REALTY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/30/2002
DES-I 2016 GRATOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2021
STRAUS, DANIELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/13/2003
BARUCH, DAVIDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021
HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/13/2003

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 20%Other / private 21%

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$473per resident / day
operating cost
$14,368per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$415per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225509. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next