Care One At Peabody

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 436 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 174 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 136.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles on three of three units. Specifically, 1. The facility failed to secure drugs and biologicals on three of three units when two treatment carts and one medication room were accessible to the surveyor unsupervised. 2. The facility failed to properly label and store medications in medication carts on two of three units. 3. The facility failed to secure medications in a resident room for one (Resident #90) of 28 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage, dated as revised February 2023, indicated the following: -The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity and light controls. Only authorized personnel have access to keys. Medication Storage -Medications and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to update the care plan for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one Resident (#75) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Care Plans Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 4/25/22, indicated that assessments of the residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses including stroke and dysphagia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/27/25, indicated that Resident #75 was rarely/never understood and a staff assessment for Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated Resident #75 required partial/moderate assistance with meals, was holding food in mouth or cheeks or residual food in mouth after meals and had a mechanically altered diet. On 3/25/25 at 8:37 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #75 sitting up in bed eating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for one Resident (#494) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement a physician's order to notify provider (physician, nurse practitioner) if Resident #494's daily weight indicated an increase of greater than two pounds. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Weight Assessment and Intervention' dated March 2023, indicated the following but was not limited to: - Resident weights are monitored for undesirable or unintended weight loss or gain. Resident #494 was admitted to the facility in March 2025 with diagnoses including heart failure and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of Resident #494's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/19/25, indicated an entry tracking record and a comprehensive MDS had not been completed. Review of Resident #494's physician's orders, dated 3/19/25, indicated daily weights. Notify provider of weight of two pounds or more daily or five pounds in a week in the morning.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards including ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility for one Resident (#536), who required renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys stop working), out of 28 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate communication with the dialysis facility and failed to implement a Dietitian's recommendation to give phosphate binders (a medication to absorb phosphate from the food you eat to help prevent high phosphorus levels) that was communicated in Resident #536's dialysis communication book. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Hemodialysis Pre and Post Care revised March 2010, indicated the following but not limited to: - Document all communications in the hemodialysis communication progress note or dialysis center communication book. - Ensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staffing level reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that sufficient staffing levels were maintained to safely and adequately meet each resident's personal and cognitive care needs. Findings include: During offsite preparation, the CASPER Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, submitted by the facility for Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 1 2024 (October 1, 2023 - December 31, 2023), was reviewed. The facility's report triggered that the facility reported excessively low weekend staffing. Review of the facility assessment indicated the following: - Based on the above information and programming goals, a staffing plan has been developed to meet the professional, technical and administrative needs of the center. The plan is informed by historical experience, and projected changes. The approach takes into consideration both the type of staff (licensure or other credential) and number provided. SEE ATTACHMENT 1 - Staffing by shift. -Attachment 1 indicated the total Direct Care PPD (Per Patient Day) was .87 and Nursing PPD was 3.91. The Administrator provided…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience on the second and third floor units. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Assistance with Meals, revised March 2022, indicated the following: - Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident. - Residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort and dignity, for example: not standing over residents while assisting them with meals; avoiding the use of labels when referring to residents (e.g., feeders). Review of the facility policy titled Dignity, dated February 2021, indicated the following: - When assisting with care, residents are supported in exercising their rights. For example, residents are provided with a dignified dining experience. The surveyor made the following observations on the third-floor unit: - On 4/7/24 at 8:20 A.M., while organizing the meal carts in the hallway, staff referred to a resident as a feeder with other residents sitting nearby in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) Review of the facility policy titled Assistance with Meals, revised March 2022, indicated the following: - Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident. - Facility staff will serve resident trays and will help residents who require assistance with eating. - The nursing staff will prepare residents for eating. Resident #95 was admitted to the facility in December 2021 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), unspecified psychosis and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #95's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE] indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 out of a possible 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated that the Resident requires supervision/touching assist for eating and is dependent on staff for all other activities of daily living. The surveyor made the following observations: - On 4/7/24 at 8:13 A.M., Resident #95 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure hairnets were worn in the food preparation area, food was labeled, and dented cans of food were not stored with usable cans. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Preparation and Service, revised November 2022, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - Food and nutrition service staff wear hair restraints (hair net, hat, beard restraint etc.) so that hair does not contact food. Review of the facility's policy titled Food Receiving and Storage, revised November 2022, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 5. When food is delivered to the facility it is inspected for safe transport and quality before being accepted. -Refrigerated/frozen storage: 1. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer are covered, labeled and dated (use by date.) 7. Refrigerated foods are labeled, dated and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for four Residents (#100, #18, #41, and #61) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, 1.) For Resident #100, the facility failed to complete daily documentation for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), 2.) For Resident #18, the facility failed to ensure nursing accurately documented the presence and function of an air mattress, 3.) For Resident #41, the facility failed to ensure a nurse accurately documented a wound dressing as not completed, instead of as completed, and 4.) For Resident #61, the facility failed to ensure a physician's plan of care for liquid protein for wound healing and malnutrition was documented accurately. 1.) Resident #100 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnoses including depression, anxiety and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #100's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality to three Residents (#61, #41 and #214) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, 1.) For Resident #61, the facility failed to transcribe and implement physician's orders for changes in a pressure wound treatment, 2.) For Resident #41, the facility failed to implement a physician's order to apply a dressing to an arterial wound, and 3.) For Resident #214, the facility failed to implement a physician's order to remove sutures. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated: -Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber's that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in emergent and non-emergent situations. Licensed nurses in a management role…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA