Careone At Oradell
600 Kinderkamack Road, Oradell, NJ 07649 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 154 certified beds · (201) 967-0002 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $74,344 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-25)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.5% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.8% | 4.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 22.4% | 12.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.7% | 2.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.9% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.5% | 18.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.9% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.7% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.9% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.1% | 12.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 52.3% | 80.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.9% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.8% | 8.1% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.71 | 2.07 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.00 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 415 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 82.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 155 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.9%CMS range 48.9–60.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.7%CMS range 10.0–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 82.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 85.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 4.7–9.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.15 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 122.9 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-12-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers, and promote healing. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents, (Resident #197) who was identified as having a pressure right hip injury on 11/13/24, with no description of a wound, which progressed to an unstageable wound to the right hip with 30% slough (necrotic tissue that needs to be removed from the wound for healing to take place) with serosanguinous drainage. The wound measured 3 centimeters (cm) x 4 cm x 0.1 cm and was identified during routine wound rounds by a consultant on 11/20/24. The resident developed an unstageable pressure wound to the right hip on 11/20/24, which required chemical debridement when the resident was hospitalized on [DATE]. The evidence was as follows: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NJ #298824 Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the privacy for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #12, Resident #66, and 2 unsampled residents) during resident council meeting by 2 of 2 Recreation Aides and dignity of 1 of 4 residents (1 unsampled resident) during incontinence round and 1 of 4 residents (Resident #12) with regard to their personal care.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. 1.On 5/6/26 at 10:10 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) and Surveyor #2 (S #2) met with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) during an entrance conference meeting. The LNHA and DON agreed to set up the resident council meeting on 5/11/26 at 10:30 AM. The LNHA stated that he would notify Unsampled Resident #1 (UR #1) of the resident council meeting and the other residents who would be attending the meeting of the date and time. He further stated that meeting would be on the 2nd (second) floor of the small activity room. S #1 asked for copy of resident council list of residents who would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NJ #2601805, #2966040, and 2734209Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow its Grievances/Complaints, Filing policy and procedure by failing to; a.) conduct a formal investigation of a grievance filed by a resident and followed through, b.) prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident, and c.) actions on such issues responded to in writing, including rationale for the response. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 months of resident council meeting minutes.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/11/26 at 9:49 AM, the surveyor reviewed the last three months' resident council minutes (RCM) that were provided by the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) that included but were not limited to, and revealed: A review of the 2/24/26 RCM included information that Unsampled Resident #1 (UR #1) had concerns about aides being loud and disruptive and displayed the lack of consideration during the night shifts. UR #1 also had concern with 11:00 PM – 7:00 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCYComplaint NJ #2601805, #2727668, #2734209, and #2966040Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure a.) residents received timely and appropriate incontinence care for 6 of 8 residents (Residents #12, #17, #66, and Unsampled Residents #1, #2, and #4) and b.) staff responded to call bell timely for 2 of 33 residents (Residents #17 and #110) observed, to achieve their highest practical wellbeing. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/11/26 at 9:49 AM, the surveyor reviewed the last three months' resident council minutes (RCM) that were provided by the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) that included but were not limited to, and revealed: A review of the 4/21/26 RCM included information that residents had issues with: -A resident stated there was no proper communication. -Staffing at the weekend continued to be a serious issue. -A resident stated some of the care partners (also known as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-13 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a facility wide assessment was reviewed and updated to identify the required services and procedures necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all residents to ensure adequate facility resources to provide resident care and services. These failures had the potential to affect all 109 residents who currently live in the facility during the time of the survey. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the entrance conference on 12/02/24 at 10:12 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) documents to complete the survey process which included but were not limited to Facility Assessment (FA). Both the LNHA and DON stated that the facility's census (the number of residents currently under the care of a specific facility) was 109. On 12/03/2024 at 8:40 AM, the surveyor followed up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
COMPLAINT# NJ178354 Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a safe, clean, and homelike environment. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 units, (2 North and 2 South), and 1 of 22 residents, Resident #94. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/3/24 at 11:53 AM, during a tour of the 2nd floor nursing units, the surveyor observed a gray, dust or dirt like substance adhering to the air circulation vent covers on the 2 North Unit hallway. The surveyor observed 2 vent covers on the 2 North Unit. The surveyor proceeded to the 2 South unit nurses' station and observed a similar gray substance adhering to the vent cover in the ceiling over the desk area. The surveyor observed the gray dust like substance as well as stringy cobweb like material on vent covers in the hallway of the 2 South. The surveyor observed 2 vent covers on the 2 South Unit hallway. On 12/3/24 at 12:03 PM, the surveyor informed the Housekeeping Supervisor (HKS) and the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Complaint #175734 Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined the facility failed to: a.) ensure a resident's medication was available and administered as scheduled for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #66, reviewed for unnecessary medications and b.) ensure residents received medications as scheduled for 2 of 22 residents (Residents #79, 87) reviewed for quality of care, in accordance with physicians' orders, and standards of practice . This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life specifically by honoring the resident's shower schedule and preferences for 1 of 2 residents, Resident #52, reviewed for activities of daily living. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/3/24 at 9:50 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #52 sitting in a chair in their room dressed in well-fitted clothes. The resident was alert, oriented, and verbally responsive. Resident #52 stated for the last couple of weeks they only received a shower once a week. The resident stated that previously they had received a shower twice a week although they felt that was not enough. The resident stated that they were ambulatory and independent with ADLs (activities of daily living). On 12/3/24 10:02 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager about showers for residents. The RN/UM stated that residents were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of clinical practice for failing to prevent a potential medication interaction by administering two (2) potential interacting medications at the same time for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #55), reviewed during the medication pass observation. The deficient practices are evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the necessary respiratory care and services of residents that were receiving oxygen, according to the standard of clinical practice and the facility's policy and procedure. Specifically, a.) administer oxygen therapy according to the physician's order, b.) obtain a valid order for continuous oxygen use, c.) clarify the physician's order for as needed (PRN) oxygen, and d.) document the use of PRN oxygen therapy for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #19. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Complaint # 175734 Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure resident's highest practical wellbeing by failing to: a.) provide nursing assistance care to resident in accordance with the resident care plans for 1 of 22 residents, Resident #22, reviewed and b.) maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to-shift ratios as mandated by the state of New Jersey . This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/2/24 at 11:20 AM, the Resident Representative of Resident #27 requested to talk to the surveyor, who stated, They have a huge staffing issue, on Saturday 11/30/24, they had one aide on the floor, I got from a source that it was a scheduling issue and it was a common thing, these girls are working hard. On 12/3/24 at 11:11 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #22 sitting on the wheelchair in the resident's room. The surveyor interviewed the resident who stated that they attended resident council meeting every month and held a position in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accurate daily report of licensed nurses, certified nursing assistant staffing, and the resident census was posted at the beginning of the current shift for 2 of 6 days during the annual re-certification survey. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/2/24 at 9:00 AM, upon entry to the facility, the surveyor observed a Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) posted at the front desk by the main entrance. The NHRCSR posted was dated 11/30/24 with a census of 107, for the [7:00 AM to 3:00 PM] day shift. There was no NHRCSR for 12/2/24 posted. On 12/4/24 at 11:21 AM, the surveyor interviewed the covering Receptionist on the main entrance, who was also the Unit 2 South Unit Clerk (UC), regarding the posting of the NHRCSR. The UC stated, The Staffing Coordinator (SC), will print it out and give it to the receptionist to put it up. She will also print out the weekend and Monday schedules and give it to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medication for 1 of 2 medication storage areas and 2 of 3 medication carts inspected according to facility's policy and standard of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, review of medical record, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to offer residents a pneumococcal and influenza vaccines or document the refusal and reason for ineligibility for the vaccines for 4 of 22 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #42, #66, #94 and #197). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, recommends pneumococcal vaccination (PCV) for many adults based on age, having certain risk conditions, and pneumococcal vaccines already received . CDC recommends PCV15, PCV20, or PCV21 for adults who never received a PCV and are Ages 65 years or older Ages 19 through 64 years with certain risk conditions. Chronic conditions and other factors that increase someone's risk for pneumococcal disease include Chronic heart, kidney, liver, or lung disease (Chronic lung disease includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), emphysema, and asthma); Diabetes; Immunocompromising condition (having a weakened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00178451 Based on interviews, records review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 11/22/2024 and 11/25/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure and provide the correct medication for a resident (Resident #1) according to the Physician's Order when the facility's providing pharmacy sent a different medication to the facility. This deficient practice was observed in 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medications and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but was not limited to Malignant Neoplasm of Left Breast, Cerebral Infarction, Altered Mental Status, Osteoarthritis, Muscle Weakness, and Anxiety Disorder. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool that provides a comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional capabilities, dated 09/30/2024, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, indicating the Resident's cognition was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints #: NJ00163185, NJ00166154, NJ00157351, NJ00155283 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure resident's highest practical wellbeing by failing to: a.) maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to-shift ratios as mandated by the state of New Jersey (NJ) and b.) ensure that 7 AM-3 PM, 3-11 PM, and 11-7 shifts were staffed to provide the ADLs (activities of daily living) for nine (9) of 17 residents, (Residents#4, #13, #22, #23, #32, #233, #235, #312, and #263) according to facility practice, required minimum direct care staff-to-shift ratios as mandated by the state of NJ, and facility assessment. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) memo, dated 01/28/2021, Compliance with N.J.S.A. (New Jersey Statutes Annotated) 30:13-18, new minimum staffing requirements for nursing homes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint#00154889 Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) ensure written grievance decisions met documentation requirements and b) maintain evidence of the result of all grievances for no less than three (3) years from the date the grievance decision was issued according to facility practice and policy. 1. The surveyor reviewed Resident #161's medical records. The admission Record (AR; or face sheet; an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere without behavioral disturbance, essential hypertension (occurs when you have abnormally high blood pressure that's not the result of a medical condition), muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and difficulty walking. The admission Minimum Data Set (aMDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/21/22 showed a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0661 — patternEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints#: NJ00160781 and NJ00157351 Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that: a) the discharge summary provides necessary information to continuing care providers pertaining to the course of treatment while the resident was in the facility and the resident's plans for care after discharge and b) the discharge summary must include an accurate and current description of the clinical status of the resident and sufficiently detailed, individualized care instructions, for four (4) of five (5) residents (Residents #108, #109, #262, and 263) reviewed for discharge home. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #108. The admission Record (or AR; face sheet; an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility and had diagnoses that were not limited to essential hypertension (elevated blood pressure), unspecified fracture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # NJ00160781 Based on interviews and record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice that meet each resident's physical, mental and psychosocial needs. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for closed record review, (Resident #262) and was evidenced by the following: Reference: NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 13 LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY CHAPTER 37 NEW JERSEY BOARD OF NURSING 13:37-6.5 NON-DELEGABLE NURSING TASKS b) A registered professional nurse shall not delegate the physical, psychological, and social assessment of the patient, which requires professional nursing judgment, intervention, referral, or modification of care. The surveyor reviewed Resident #262's closed medical record. The admission Record (or face sheet; an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation it was determined the facility failed to: a) ensure the facility policy for Accidents and Incidents was followed to thoroughly investigate each fall, appropriately assess a resident, determine the causal factor of each fall and provide conclusion and summary, implement appropriate interventions to prevent recurrent falls, and update care plan for six (6) out of six (6) investigations, b) implement policies and procedure for reporting a fall that resulted in a major injury to State Agency in accordance to current guidelines for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #46) reviewed for falls; and c) complete an initial smoking assessment and initiate a care plan for smoking for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for smoking (Resident #93). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the N.J. (New Jersey) Admin. (Administrative) Code 8:43E-10.6 Current through Register Vol. 54, No. 41, September 5,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # NJ00160781 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for one (1) of 24 residents, (Resident #262) reviewed for MDS accuracy, and was evidenced by the following: According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Minimum Data Set 3.0 Public Reports page last modified 12/01/21, included that the MDS is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. Care Area Assessments (CAAs) are part of this process, and provide the foundation upon which a resident's individual care plan is formulated. MDS assessments are completed for all residents in certified nursing homes, regardless of the source of payment for the individual resident. MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint#NJ00157351 Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of clinical practice for a) not initialing the Electronic Treatment Administration Record (eTAR) for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident#110), reviewed for oxygen order and b) ensure that the Speech Therapist's recommendations were followed through for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #263), reviewed for nutrition. The deficient practices are evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as casefinding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care and services for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #72) reviewed for catheter. This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 8/24/23 at 10:39 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #72 sitting on a wheelchair, dressed and was conversant. The resident stated they were being discharged that morning. The surveyor observed the resident had a catheter drainage bag secured to the bottom of wheelchair without a privacy cover. The surveyor reviewed Resident #72's medical record. According to the admission Record (or face sheet; an admission summary), Resident #72 was admitted with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, sepsis (body's overactive and extreme response to an infection; is a life-threatening medical emergency) , hyperlipidemia (an abnormally high concentration of fats or lipids in the blood), indwelling ureteral stent (implanted device in the ureter to help drain urine from the kidney, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and anemia ( lower than normal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a.) tracheostomy (trach) care and services were provided according to the standard of practice for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #28) reviewed for tracheostomy care and b.) a resident received oxygen as ordered by the physician for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #58) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 8/23/23 at 11:07 AM, surveyor observed Resident #28, lying in bed with their eyes closed, tracheotomy (a surgically created hole in windpipe (trachea) that provides an alternative airway for breathing) clean, dry, and intact. The surveyor reviewed the medical records for resident #28. The admission Record (AR; or face sheet; an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to down syndrome (a congenital condition ), contact with and (suspected) exposure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the 24-hour staffing report that was posted was up to date and provided an accurate information. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/23/23 at 8:56 AM, the survey team entered the facility and observed that the 24-hour staffing report that was posted was dated 8/18/23. The staffing report was not up to date. On 8/28/23 at 6:30 AM, two surveyors entered the facility and observed that the 24-hour staffing report that was posted was dated 8/25/23 and that the census listed was 118. The staffing report was not up to date. On 8/28/23 at 7:35 AM, the surveyor asked the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) to provide a copy of Resident Census from Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and Monday. On 8/28/23 at 8:11 AM, the LNHA provided a copy of the facility census from Friday through Monday as follows: Date: 8/25/23; Census: 121 Date: 8/26/23; Census: 121 Date: 8/27/23; Census: 122 Date: 8/28/23; Census: 122 The 24-hour staffing report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to act upon the recommendations in the monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) identified irregularities of the Consultant Pharmacist's (CP's) for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #110) reviewed for closed records. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed Resident #110's medical records. The resident's admission Record (or face sheet; admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility and had diagnoses that were not limited to essential hypertension (elevated blood pressure), other seizures, type two diabetes mellitus without complications (is a chronic disease affecting blood glucose regulation), cerebral infarction unspecified (stroke), Alzheimer's disease unspecified. A review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care showed that the resident had no most recent admission MDS (aMDS) and quarterly MDS (qMDS) because the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the medication observation conducted on 8/28/23, the surveyor observed four nurses administer medications to sixteen residents. There were 25 opportunities, and two errors were observed which resulted in a medication error rate of 8%. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of three (3) residents, that was administered by one (1) of three (3) nurses. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the manufacturer's specifications for Metoprolol Tartrate (Lopressor) reflected that the medication was to be administered with or immediately following a meal. A review of the manufacturer's specifications for Potassium Chloride (Klor-Con) reflected should be taken with meals and with glass of water or other liquid. This product should not be taken on an empty stomach because of its potential for gastric irritation. During the initial tour on 8/23/23 at 10:16 AM, the surveyors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a) appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for two (2) of four (4) staff observed during meal observation and b) appropriate hand hygiene practice for one (1) of two (2) staff observed during treatment observation according to facility policy and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC, Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings, last reviewed on January 30, 2020, Hand Hygiene Guidance, The Core Infection Prevention and Control Practices for Safe Care Delivery in All Healthcare Settings recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) include the following strong recommendations for hand hygiene in healthcare settings. Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: Immediately before touching a patient Before performing an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a) the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) dedicated solely to the infection prevention and control program (IPCP) for one (1) of one (1) staff and b) the IP participated in Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) for two (2) of three (3) quarters reviewed QAPI in accordance with the facility policy and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and New Jersey (NJ) guidelines. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the NJ Executive Directive 21-012 (revised 12/22/22) included ii. The facility's designated individual(s) with training in infection prevention and control shall assess the facility's IPCP by establishing or revising the infection control plan, annual infection prevention and control program risk assessment, and conducting internal quality improvement audits. According to the CMS QSO-22-19-NH Memo dated 6/29/22 and Fact Sheet, Updated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0944 — isolatedConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure facility staff had mandatory training that outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement) program for two (2) of five (5) Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) reviewed for mandatory education. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/01/23 at 9:09 AM, the surveyor reviewed the annual in-service education hours for five randomly selected CNA files, which were provided by the facility. The Staff In-service Logs showed the following: CNA #1 had a hire date of 3/14/18. According to the Training Hours Transcripts, CNA #1 did not have QAPI training. CNA #2 had a hire date of 7/22/19. According to the Training Hours Transcripts, CNA #1 did not have QAPI training. On 9/01/23 at 10:45 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Facility Educator/Registered Nurse (FE/RN) regarding the process for CNA education. The FE/RN stated that they have 12 hours of mandatory continuing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. The surveyor observed LPN #3 administer medications to Resident #52 on 6/29/21 at 8:05 AM. LPN #3 stated she had sanitized the blood pressure machine and the cuff prior to the surveyor arriving at the medication cart. She measured the resident's blood pressure, brought the machine out of the room to the hallway, and did not sanitize the machine or cuff. LPN #3 completed Resident #52's medication administration at 8:20 AM. The surveyor asked the nurse if she had completed the medication administration. She replied that she had finished. The surveyor alerted the nurse that she had not sanitized the blood pressure machine or cuff after use. Additionally, she had not performed hand hygiene when the medication pass was completed. 5. The surveyor observed LPN #4 administer medications to Resident #41 on 6/29/21 at 8:25 AM. LPN #4 did not perform hand hygiene prior to pouring medications for the resident. LPN #4 sanitized the blood pressure machine and cuff without the use of gloves after pouring medications. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it, was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide services in a manner to preserve the dignity of 5 residents observed (Residents #10, 88, 41, 52, and 87). The evidence is as follows: 1. The surveyor observed Resident #10 awake and alert in bed watching television on 6/23/21 at 10:23 AM. The surveyor observed four handwritten 8 1/2 by 11-inch signs posted over the resident's bed indicating the resident was not to use straws due to a choking hazard. The surveyor reviewed the medical record of the resident which revealed the following. The admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The 3/27/21 Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment tool (MDS) indicated the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 13 of a possible 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was assessed to usually make self understood and to understand others. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of nursing practice for a) leaving medication unattended on a resident's bedside 1 of 2 residents (Resident #41); b) not checking medication labels three times prior to administering medications for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #41, 52); and c) not initialing the Electronic Treatment Administration Record (ETAR) for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #71). The deficient practices are evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as casefinding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$74,344 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $74,344 — penalty dated 2024-11-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.4 | -2.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 36 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THCI OF NEW JERSRY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/25/2008 |
| CARE REALTY, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/10/2003 |
| DES 2009 GST TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2021 |
| STRAUS, DANIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/17/2003 |
| BARUCH, DAVID | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2021 |
| HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2003 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315339. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.