CareOne At Teaneck

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 709 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 190 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 83.6 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.74 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure initial and weekly weights were implemented for two out three residents (Resident (R) 26 and R92). This lack of monitoring of residents' weight loss/gain can delay in identifying potential nutritional problems.Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention dated 03/22 indicated .Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team such as: weekly for four weeks, the monthly unless otherwise indicated. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss is based on the following criteria.1 month-5 percent weight loss is significant.6 months-10 percent weight loss is significant. Review of R26's EMR titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R26's EMR titled Nutritional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to make choices about their life including interacting with family members in the community for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident (R) 78). Specifically, R78 had an outing in the community scheduled with her son; however, the resident was denied her right to leave the facility with her son. This failure violated the resident's rights, placed the resident at risk for psychosocial decline, and placed the resident at risk for a diminished quality of life.Findings include:Review of R78's undated Face Sheet located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE].Review of R78's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 06/24/25 revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect one of two residents (Resident (R) 93) from misappropriation of property. This failure has the potential to affect all residents who choose to keep money and/or private property in their rooms. Findings include:Review of a facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol, dated 03/2018, indicated .All types of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of resident property are strictly prohibited.Review of R93's electronic medical records (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the frontal lobe. Review of R93's EMR titled Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab, dated 05/26/24, indicated the resident had difficulty with understanding/communicating.Review of R93's EMR titled admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to include in the physician's order a 14-day limit for an as needed psychotropic medication for one (Resident (R)1) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. This had the potential to place the resident at a higher risk for falls, injury, and confusion.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, revised 02/25, provided by the facility revealed .3. PRN [as needed] orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. a. For psychotropic medications that are NOT antipsychotics: If the prescriber or attending physician believes it is appropriate to extend the PRN order beyond 14 days, they will document the rationale for extending the use and include the duration for the PRN order.Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 07/01/25, located in the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed an admission date of 06/18/25, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of misappropriation for one (Resident (R) 93) of two residents reviewed for abuse out of 40 sampled residents. The facility's failure to complete a thorough investigation placed residents at risk of being unprotected from misappropriation. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating dated 09/22 indicated . All allegations are thoroughly investigated. The administrator initiates investigations. interviews the resident (as medically appropriate) or the resident's representative. interviews staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident. interviews the resident's roommate, family members. documents the investigation completely and thoroughly. Review of R93's electronic medical records (EMR) titled admission Record located…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain wound treatment orders, upon admission, to provide treatment for one of two residents (Resident (R) 93) and failed to implement wound prevention measures upon admission. This failure had the potential to lead to infection and worsen the pressure ulcer.Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Prevention of Pressure Injuries, dated 04/20, indicated . Review the resident's care plan and identify the risk factors as well as the interventions designed to reduce or eliminate those considered modifiable. Review of R93's electronic medical records (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R93's EMR titled Resident Evaluation located under the Forms tab, dated 05/25/24, indicated the resident had a stage II pressure ulcer upon admission. Review of a document provided by the facility titled Resident Evaluation, dated 05/25/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication orders were followed and administered through a feeding tube according to standard of practice for one (Resident (R)103) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. This practice had the potential to alter the drug release, absorption, and/or effectiveness as well as causing discomfort.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube, revised 11/18, provided by the facility revealed The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of medications through an enteral tube. 3. Administer each medication separately and flush between medications. 4. Do not crush or split medications for administration through an enteral tube unless first checking with the pharmacy or facility approved Do Not Crush Medication List. a. Tablets that must be crushed prior to administration through an enteral tube require a specific order related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food preferences were honored for one out of two sampled residents (Resident (R) 26). The facility failed to ensure the resident was given dinner that she had ordered and strawberry ice cream. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Menu, dated 10/2017 indicated . Menus are developed and prepared to meet resident choices. Review of R26's electronic medical records (EMR) titled admission Record dated 04/22/25 initially and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an observation conducted on 07/28/25 at 11:32 AM, R26 pointed to a tray and gave permission to lift the lid to her meal. Observed a beef and Asian noodle dish. R26 explained that she had saved her dinner meal from the night before since it was not what she had ordered. The resident stated she ordered a grilled steak. During this interview the resident presented a menu titled Selection Sheet, dated 07/27/25, for the dinner meal. The resident stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 26) reviewed for assistive devices during dining out of a total sample of 40. This had the potential to cause a decrease in the resident's dietary intake. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Assistance with Meals dated 03/22, indicated .Adaptive devices (special eating equipment and utensils) will be provided for residents who need or request them. These may include devices such as silverware with enlarged/padded handles. Review of R26's electronic medical records (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Review of R26's EMR titled admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/10/25 indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 which revealed the resident was cognitively intact.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records were complete for one of three residents (Resident (R) 26) reviewed for tube feeding orders out of a total sample of 40 residents. This had the potential for the resident not to receive accurate care.Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Medication Orders dated 11/14 indicated .The purpose of this procedure is to establish uniform guidelines in the receiving and recording of medication orders. Review of R26's electronic medical records (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R26's EMR titled physician Orders located under the Orders tab, dated 06/04/25, indicated the resident was to receive Jevity (nutritional feeding) 1.2 rate 237 mL (milliliter) five times a day via bolus/gravity via a gastrostomy-tube (g-tube). This order continued until it was discontinued on 07/18/25. Review of R26's EMR titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ