No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Careone At Ridgewood Avenue

W-90 Ridgewood Ave, Paramus, NJ 07652 · For profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (201) 652-1950 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 immediate-jeopardy citation$16,149 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • the CMS record shows $16,149 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-04)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2 Sears Dr · (973) 866-0336 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1 Kalisa Way Ste 104 · (201) 549-8895 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
404 N State RT 17 · (201) 265-9624 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Play Area0.5 mi
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
348 Evelyn St · (201) 599-8452

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.6%8.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.0%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.6%0.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms91.5%12.1%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.3%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.3%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.3%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers21.8%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control41.8%15.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.9%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.8%80.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.1%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.9%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.542.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.481.111.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 899 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.57hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.53hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 274 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 45% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.0%CMS range 62.5–70.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 7.9–11.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge89.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 5.5–10.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.321.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.93
RN hours/ resident / day
1.00
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.12
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.05
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.78
RN hoursweekends
44.6%
Total nursing turnover
36.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 105.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-04)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Part B 2. The surveyor interviewed Resident #98 on 5/30/25 at 10:58 AM. The resident was seated in a wheelchair at the bedside. The resident stated they were currently receiving chemotherapy. The resident stated they were experiencing generalized weakness and weakness of the left leg resulting in difficulty with ambulation. The resident stated they use the call bell device to request assistance getting from the bed to the wheelchair, for toileting, and for dressing. The resident stated the call bell response can be very slow. The resident described an incident which had occurred the previous week. The resident had propelled their wheelchair into the bathroom unassisted. The resident transferred themself onto the toilet and had a bowel movement. The resident rang the call bell for assistance with cleaning themself. The resident waited for one half hour, received no response, and stood up from the toilet and used the wheelchair as a rolling walker pushing the wheelchair in front of themself and ambulated to the bedside. The resident attempted to place a pillow case on the wheelchair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide pain management that is consistent with professional standards of practice, the resident's goal and preference, and ensure a.) an assessment of a resident's pain was conducted after verbalized pain, and an as needed pain medication was administered when requested (Resident #10) c.) administer the correct narcotic pain medication based on the resident's reported pain intensity and in accordance with the physician's order (Resident #47). This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents investigated for pain management and was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 6/3/25 at 9:26 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #10 seated in the dining area with other residents. The surveyor overheard the resident speaking loudly from the nurse's station, I want my pain medication. The surveyor observed the nurse's medication cart that was parked next to the nurse's station. The surveyor observed the Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure a.) disposition and removal of a narcotic medication for an Unsampled Resident who was discharged on 5/21/25, b.) consistent quality control testing was conducted for the blood glucose (bg) used for residents, c) supplies that required dating when opened were dated, d.) a blood pressure medication was administered for Resident #47, in accordance with the physician orders, e.) a narcotic medication was disposed in accordance with facility policy that allowed for accurate reconciliation and accountability (Resident #10). The deficient practices were identified on 2 of the 3 medication carts inspected, and two of two residents reviewed for pain regimen (Resident #10 and 47) and was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 6/3/25 at 12:47 PM, the surveyor and the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) began the began the narcotic medication inspection, which was stored in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the call bell within reach of the resident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 21 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #62), and was evidenced by the following: On 05/30/25 at 11:50 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #62 in his room in bed. The call bell device was located on the floor between the resident's bed and roommates' bed not within Resident #62's reach. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #62. A review of the admission Record reflected that Resident #62 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; malfunctioning of the cystostomy (medical device inserted into the bladder to drain urine) pneumonitis r/t inhalation of food and vomit, and Alzheimer's disease. A review of Resident #62's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 3/17/25 revealed Resident #62 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15 which indicated severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post the prior year's State of New Jersey (State) inspection results in an area that was readily accessible to residents, families, and the public. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/2/25 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor looked for the most recent State inspection results on the north and south Nursing Units and was unable to locate them. On 6/2/25 at 10:15 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the receptionist stated that the prior year's survey results were in a binder in the lobby but was not sure where they were located. After a search, the surveyor located the binder on the back wall of the lobby lying flat on the top shelf of a cabinet behind a decorative container not easily accessible to residents. On 6/2/25 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor conducted a group meeting with 6 alert and oriented residents chosen by the facility. Six of 6 residents stated they did not know where to find the State inspection results. On 6/3/25 at 12:16 PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a nebulizer mask was stored in accordance with infection control measures for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Respiratory therapy, Resident #41. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NJ00173564 Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurately documented and complete record for 2 of 21 records reviewed (Resident #98, 363). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor interviewed Resident #98 on 5/30/25 at 10:58 AM. The resident was seated in a wheelchair at the bedside. The resident stated they use the call bell device to request assistance getting from the bed to the wheelchair, for toileting, and for dressing. The resident stated the call bell response can be very slow. The resident described a fall incident which had occurred the previous week on 5/24/25. A review of the electronic medical record revealed the following information. The 5/2/25 admission Miniumum Data Set assessment tool (MDS) indicated the resident had no cognitive deficits as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of a possible 15. The fall care plan, initiated 4/25/25 and revised 5/29/25, indicated the resident was at risk for falls due to impaired balance and poor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the consistent coordination/communication was provided between facility staff and hospice staff to meet the resident's needs (Resident #4). This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for hospice and end of life care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/29/25 at 10:12 AM, during the initial tour, a surveyor observed Resident #4 seated in a geriatric chair (Geri chair; large, padded chair designed to assist individuals with limited mobility). At 11:30 AM, during an interview with a surveyor the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on the unit stated Resident #4 was on hospice care. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #4. According to the admission Record (AR; or face sheet, an admission summary), the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included: Parkinson's Disease (progressive neurological disorder), seizures and dysphagia (difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure food stored in the unit refrigerators on one of four units was stored in a sanitary manner. This failure had the potential to affect the 15 residents on the 1south unit with a census of 82. Findings include: Observation on 09/25/23 at 9:03 AM revealed the first floor south resident refrigerator located by the nursing station contained a container of caramel dip that was not labeled with the date it was opened and was not labeled with a resident name; a container of what appeared to be partially eaten pasta dish with Resident (R) 49's name written on it, the container was not dated to indicate when it was placed in the refrigerator. There was one four-ounce container of Ready Care mighty shake on the shelf in the door. The container was not dated to indicate when it was thawed out. The manufacturer's instructions on the container stated to be used within 14 days of thawing. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 09/25/23 at 9:30 AM at the time of the observation revealed the food should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure each Medicare resident whose Medicare therapy services were terminated received a notice including the reason the services were ending or what the options were prior to the discontinuation of therapy services. This had the potential to affect one of three residents (Resident (R)259) who were reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review. Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R259 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R259 had Medicare benefits and when she was discharged from skilled therapy services on 07/13/23, she had not exhausted her Medicare benefit days. However, the facility failed to notify her representative regarding the expiration of benefits prior to the expiration date. Further review of the EMR failed to reveal any documentation of R259 and/or R259's representative being given written notification of the discontinuation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the private health information for eleven of eleven (R49, R312, R65, R41, R311, R28, R309, R310, R35, R68 and R308) residents reviewed for resident rights out of 22 sampled residents by leaving the resident's personal and medical information exposed on an open and unattended computer screen in an area accessible to the public. Findings included: Review of a facility's policy titled, Computer Terminals/Workstations, revision date April 2014, revealed, .3. A user may not leave his/her workstation or terminal unattended unless the terminal screen is cleared and the user is logged off. Each user must log off at the end of his/her work shift . Observation of the medication cart on the 1 North Hall on 09/25/23 at 9:30 AM revealed the medication cart was observed unattended. The computer screen on the cart was open and showed R49's face, name, room number, and medications the resident received. The cart was unattended with the c until 9:33 AM when Registered Nurse (RN) 8 returned.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to clean the filter of the Oxygen concentrator for the use of delivering supplemental oxygen for one of four residents (Resident (R) 9) reviewed for Oxygen of the twenty-six sampled residents Findings include: Review of R9's Face Sheet in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease and hypertension. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) in the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/27/23 coded the resident as having a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. This represented R9 was cognitively intact. On 09/25/23 at 9:49 AM an observation was made at which time the resident was wearing the oxygen at 2liters/minute by nasal cannula. The filter had a white lint like substance on it. On 09/27/23 at 11:20 AM R9's oxygen concentrator had a white lint like substance on it. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to store medication in a locked compartment when left unattended (first floor medication cart #1), failed to have a medication label that could be read (second floor medication cart #2) as well as fail to ensure the medication cart was secure when out of the site of the nursing staff. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage with a revision date of February 2023, stated . Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing medications and biologicals are locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items are not left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others . During the Medication Pass Observation on 09/27/23 at 9:28 AM. Registered Nurse (RN)8 was preparing the pills to administer to R63. RN8 stated, There is no Tylenol in my cart, so I have to go and get it. RN8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,149 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-06-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 36 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Care One At MillburyMillbury, MA 1 of 5Care One At RandolphRandolph, MA 1 of 5Careone At OradellOradell, NJ 2 of 5Care One At BrooklineBrookline, MA 2 of 5Care One At NewtonNewton, MA 2 of 5Care One At RedstoneEast Longmeadow, MA 2 of 5Care One At WeymouthWeymouth, MA 2 of 5CareOne At Hanover TownshipWhippany, NJ 2 of 5Careone At MiddletownAtlantic Highlands, NJ 2 of 5Rehab & Nursing Ctr Greater PittsburghGreensburg, PA 3 of 5Care One At LexingtonLexington, MA 3 of 5Care One At LowellLowell, MA 3 of 5Care One At New BedfordNew Bedford, MA 3 of 5CareOne At Madison AvenueMorristown, NJ 3 of 5CareOne At MoorestownMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5CareOne at New MilfordNew Milford, NJ 3 of 5Careone At East BrunswickEast Brunswick, NJ 3 of 5Careone At WellingtonHackensack, NJ 4 of 5Care One At ConcordW Concord, MA 4 of 5Care One At Essex ParkBeverly, MA 4 of 5Care One At NorthamptonNorthampton, MA 4 of 5CareOne At TeaneckTeaneck, NJ 4 of 5CareOne at The HighlandsEdison, NJ 4 of 5Careone At CresskillCresskill, NJ 4 of 5Careone At EveshamMarlton, NJ 4 of 5Careone At LivingstonLivingston, NJ 4 of 5Careone At ParsippanyParsippany Troy Hill, NJ 4 of 5Careone At Somerset ValleyBound Brook, NJ 5 of 5Care One At HolyokeHolyoke, MA 5 of 5Care One At PeabodyPeabody, MA 5 of 5Care One At WilmingtonWilmington, MA 5 of 5CareOne At WallWall, NJ 5 of 5Careone At HolmdelHolmdel, NJ 5 of 5Careone At ValleyWestwood, NJ 5 of 5Careone At WayneWayne, NJ 5 of 5River Glen Health Care CenterSouthbury, CT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CARE ONE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2009
DES 2009 GST TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST18%since 12/01/2021
DES HOLDING CO., INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST24%since 12/16/2007
DES-C 2009 GRATOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST21%since 10/26/2009
STRAUS, DANIELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST38%since 04/21/2007
BARUCH, DAVIDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021
CARE ONE MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2007
HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2009

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$26.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 58%Other / private 42%

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$692per resident / day
operating cost
$21,022per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$803per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315426. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next