Care One At Randolph
49 Thomas Patten Drive, Randolph, MA 02368 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 168 certified beds · (781) 831-0354 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.7% | 16.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.3% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.5% | 15.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.9% | 19.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.0% | 94.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 4.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.8% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.7% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 37.9% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.5% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.9% | 11.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.19 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.60 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 410 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 139 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.5%CMS range 50.1–59.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 9.6–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 92.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 91.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 5.8–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 168 beds and averages 141.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-05-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and prevent a left knee contracture from developing after resident completed the initial course of physical therapy for one Resident (#106), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings include: Resident #106 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with a diagnosis of stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis) of the left side. The Resident's Health Care Proxy (HCP) was activated on 11/5/22. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/25/23, indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15 which indicated the Resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Section G0400 Functional limitation in range of motion for the lower extremity: No impairment. During an interview on 5/21/23 at 3:27 P.M., Family Member (FM) #1 said Resident #106's left leg has become more and more contracted. FM #1 said Resident #106 received physical therapy until January 2023 and it was stopped because the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Resident Council Minutes, a resident group meeting, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure grievances brought forward from the Resident Council were addressed and promptly resolved to ensure the residents felt their concerns were acted upon timely and included the facility response to the group.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Council, last revised February 2021, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The purpose of the Resident Council is to provide a forum for: -residents, families and resident representatives to have input in the operation of the facility; -discussion of concerns and suggestions for improvement; -consensus building and communication between residents and facility staff; and -disseminating information and gathering feedback from interested residents.-A Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. The facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the item(s) of concern.Review of the facility's policies titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP)/Resident Representative timely of a change in condition for three Residents (#71, #132 and #24), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #71, to notify the Physician/NP: a. when the Resident had a new onset of auditory hallucinations and alleged suicide attempt (pulled out dialysis fistula - a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein, typically in the arm, used to provide access for hemodialysis (a treatment that filters waste from the blood when the kidneys fail) during dialysis treatment at an outpatient dialysis center, and b. when the Resident pulled out his/her dialysis arterial needle (used to draw blood from the patient's arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or graft, and then venous needles return the purified blood) at an outpatient dialysis center; 2. For Resident #132, to notify the Physician that the Resident accessed a stairwell with 26 stairs and exited the facility to the parking lot where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for three Residents (#1, #5, and #8), out of a total sample of 32 residents, resulting in the Residents being admitted to the facility without the determination of whether they screened positive for intellectual disability (ID)/developmental disability (DD) or serious mental illness (SMI) requiring further evaluation. Findings include:Review of the Nursing Facility Bulletin 169: Updates to Nursing Facility Regulations: PASRR for Intellectual Disability (ID), Developmental Disability (DD), and Serious Mental Illness (SMI), dated October 2021, indicated the following:A Level I Screening identifies whether an applicant for admission to a nursing facility has, or may have, ID, DD, and/or SMI (i.e. a positive Level I Screening). Effective October 29, 2021, a Level I Screening must be conducted using the revised Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screening Form, PASRR-L1 (10/21). If the individual has a positive Level I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and individualize comprehensive care plans for three Residents (#71, #33, and #8), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #71, to develop and implement a person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes: a. to address recent onset of auditory hallucinations and self-injurious behavior/alleged suicide attempt; andb. to address the use of Sertraline (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used to treat anxiety) and Lorazepam (antianxiety) that identified resident specific targeted behaviors, non-pharmacological interventions, and measurable goals of treatment;2. For Resident #33, to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address the use of Risperidone (antipsychotic) and Mirtazapine (antidepressant) that identified resident specific targeted behaviors, non-pharmacological interventions, and measurable goals of treatment; and 3. To ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address Resident #8's chronic left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of practice for seven Residents (#28, #43, #39, #5, #4, #71, and #1), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #28, to ensure vital sign parameters were adhered to prior to medication administration as per physician's orders;2. For Resident #43, to ensure his/her left built-up palm guard was implemented per physician's orders;3. For Resident #39,a. To ensure hospital medication reconciliation was completed and medications were implemented, andb. To ensure his/her air settings and right heel off-loading boots were implemented per physician orders;4. For Resident #5, to ensure his/her right-hand carrot orthotic and left-hand palm guard were implemented per physician's orders;5. For Resident #4, to ensure physician's orders for opioid administration were followed for Resident #4;6. For Resident #71, to ensure the physician's order for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#39), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure his/her wound (non-pressure related) recommendations were implemented.Findings include:Resident #39 was admitted to the facility in March 2025 with diagnoses which included necrotizing fasciitis (bacterial infection that destroys skin and soft tissue, including the connective tissue surrounding muscles and organs), cellulitis of right lower limb (skin infection that affects the deeper layers of the skin and underlying tissues) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD, a condition where the blood vessels in the arms, legs, and other extremities become narrowed or blocked). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/8/25, indicated Resident #39 did not have impaired memory and he/she made reasonable and consistent decisions. Review of Resident #39's care plans indicated but was not limited to:-Resident #39 was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#33 and #7), in a sample of 32 residents, were seen by the Physician at least every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter, with alternate visits by a Nurse Practitioner (NP) as indicated. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #33, to ensure the Resident was seen by the Physician or NP at least every 60 days after the first 90 days after admission; and2. For Resident #7, to ensure the Resident was seen and evaluated by a Physician or NP at least every 60 days. Findings include:1. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses including malnutrition, dementia and hypertension. Review of the Physician's Progress Notes indicated Resident #33 was seen by the Physician for an initial visit in March 2024. The Physician's Progress Notes indicated that the Resident was not seen by the Physician again until 12/26/24. All interval visits between March 2024 and November 2024 were conducted by the NP. Further review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with acceptable professional standards for one Resident (#39), of 32 sampled residents and in four of five medication carts observed. Specifically, the facility failed to:1.For Resident #39, ensure Dakins Solution (a dilute solution of sodium hypochlorite (bleach) historically used as an antiseptic for wound cleaning) was stored in a locked compartment;2. On the 3 East Unit, ensure the medication cart was locked and secured while unattended; and3. Ensure that medications and biologicals were stored in accordance with professional standards of practice in three of four observed medication carts.Findings include:Review of the facility’s policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage, dated as revised February 2023, indicated but was not limited to: -Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing medications and biologicals are locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Properly label and date food products and maintain safe/clean equipment in four of four unit nourishment kitchenettes; and2. Handle ready-to-eat food (food which does not require cooking or further preparation prior to consumption) utilizing proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination (transfer of pathogens from one surface to another). Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Foods Brought by Family/Visitors, dated October 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following:- Food brought to the facility by visitors and family is permitted. Facility staff will strive to balance resident choice and a homelike environment with the nutritional and safety needs of residents.- Food brought by family/visitors that is left with resident to consume later will labeled (sic) and stored in a manner that is clearly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed:1.To maintain an infection prevention and control program which included a complete and accurate system of surveillance to identify any trends or potential infections; 2. For Resident #10, to ensure the tubing for a gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a feeding tube inserted through the abdominal wall) was not in contact with the tubing for a urinary catheter;3. For Resident #17, to ensure nasal cannula (NC) tubing for oxygen delivery through the nose, was stored in a sanitary way to prevent the possibility of contamination from germs when not in use; 4. For Resident #101, to ensure handheld nebulizer (HHN) tubing and mouthpiece set up, as well as a non-rebreather oxygen delivery device were stored in a sanitary way to prevent them from possible contamination from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide education, assess eligibility, and offer influenza (flu) vaccinations and pneumococcal vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for four Residents (#28, #39, #9, and #90), out of a sample of five residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:1. Staff offered, assessed, and provided education on the CDC recommended pneumococcal vaccines (an active immunizing agent used to prevent infection caused by certain types of pneumococcal bacteria) for Residents #28, #39, #9, and #90; and2. Staff administered the seasonal influenza vaccine to Resident #90 who had a signed consent form to receive the vaccine. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, dated as last revised in October 2023, indicated the following:-all residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections-upon admission, residents are assessed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#132) had the right to participate in his/her discharge planning process, in a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility involved the family member of Resident #132 in the discharge planning and did not involve Resident #132 who remained his/her own healthcare decision maker. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Discharge Summary and Plan, dated as last revised in March 2025, indicated: -Every resident has an individualized discharge plan, which begins at admission and is part of the comprehensive care plan-The discharge plan is developed by the care planning/interdisciplinary team with the assistance of the resident and the representative to develop interventions to meet the resident's discharge goalsReview of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, dated as last revised in February 2021, indicated but was not limited to:-These rights include the resident's right to self-determination and be supported by the facility in exercising his/her rights Resident #132…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#71), out of a sample of 32 residents, that informed, written consent was obtained for the administration of psychotropic medications, which include providing the Resident with information related to the risks and benefits of the medications, prior to administering them.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use, dated as last revised February 2025, indicated but was not limited to:-Prior to the use of, increasing the dose of, or switching to a different psychotropic medication, the staff and physician will review the following with the resident/representative prior to obtaining documented consent or refusal:-Non-pharmacological alternatives;-Indications and rationale for the recommendation;-Potential risks and benefits (including possible side effects, adverse consequences, and black box warnings); and-The resident's/representative's right to accept or decline the treatment.Resident #71 was admitted to the facility in May 2025 and had diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to promptly resolve a grievance for a missing delivery for one Resident (#17), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances/Complaints, Filing, dated as revised April 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Residents and their representatives had the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff- the Administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and/or representative- upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the grievance officer will review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report of such findings within 5 working days of receiving the complaint/grievance- the resident filing the grievance, will be informed (verbally and in writing) of the findings of the investigation and the actions that will be taken to correct any identified problems- the Administrator will make such reports orally within 5 working days of the filing of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#33), from a total sample of 32 residents, that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications to promote or maintain the Residents' highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #33, to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was attempted, unless documented by the prescriber as clinically contraindicated in the medical record.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use, revised February 2025, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Residents on psychotropic medication receive gradual dose reductions (coupled with non-pharmacological interventions), unless clinically contraindicated, to determine whether the continued use of the medication is benefitting the resident, to find an optimal dose, or in an effort to discontinue the medication.-Psychotropic medication management is an interdisciplinary process that involves the resident, family, and/or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#101), out of a total sample of 32 residents, that footcare was provided in accordance with professional standards to help prevent potential foot problems. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Foot Care, dated as revised October 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: - residents receive appropriate foot care and treatment in order to maintain foot health- residents are provided with foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice- trained staff may provide routine foot care (e.g., toenail clipping) within professional standards of practice for residents without complicating disease processes- residents with foot disorders or medical complications associated with foot complications are referred to qualified professionals. Foot disorders that require treatment include nail disorders. Resident #101 was admitted to the facility in May 2025 with diagnoses including: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a group of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards for one Resident (#132), in a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify and intervene when the facility staff were writing secure keypad codes on door frames, including a stairwell where Resident #132, who was at risk for falls, at risk for wandering, at risk for eloping, and was experiencing confusion, accessed and descended 26 concrete stairs which lead to an alarmed exit door.Findings include:Resident #132 was admitted to the facility in May 2025 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF) and alcohol use disorder. Review of the care plans indicated Resident #132 was at risk for wandering and/or elopement, initiated 5/31/25 with interventions including implementing a scheduled toileting program, implementing scheduled hydration and schedule time for regular walks/appropriate activity. An additional care plan indicated Resident #132 was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary Behavioral Health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#71), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #71's Behavioral Health Services providers were informed and provided appropriate psychiatric follow-up when the Resident was sent to the emergency room from the dialysis center for a concern of a suicide attempt after hearing auditory hallucinations, verbalizing wanting to die, and pulling out a dialysis line. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Monitoring, revised February 2025, indicated the following:- Behavioral Interventions refers to individualized, nonpharmacological approaches to care that are provided as part of a supportive physical and psychosocial environment, directed toward understanding, preventing, relieving, and/or accommodating a resident's distress or loss of abilities, as well as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) were communicated to the physician and addressed in a timely manner for two Residents (#33 and #15), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #33, to ensure April 2025 consultant pharmacist recommendations were provided to the physician/nurse practitioner (NP) for review and response to the recommendation; and2. For Resident #15, to maintain the facility policy of documenting monthly MRR in the medical record, ensure the physician documented review of the April 2025 irregularity in the medical record and ensure the irregularity was addressed timely.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Reviews, last revised in May 2019, indicated the following: -The consultant pharmacist performs a medication regimen reviews (MRR) for every resident in the facility receiving medications -Within 24 hours of the MRR, the consultant pharmacist provides a written report to the attending physicians for each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory results were reported and acted on timely for one Resident (#9), out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report his/her 6/12/25 and 6/20/25 sodium (a vital electrolyte that helps regulate fluid balance, blood pressure, nerve and muscle function with a reference range of 136 to 145 milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L) levels to the provider resulting in a delayed hospital transfer on two occasions.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Lab and Diagnostic Test Results, dated as revised 11/2018, indicated but was not limited to:-When test results are reported to the facility, a nurse will first review the results. If staff who first receive or review lab and diagnostic test results cannot follow the remainder of this procedure for reporting or documenting the results and their implications another nurse in the facility should follow or coordinate the procedure-A nurse will identify the urgency of communicating with the attending physician based on physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for two of six sampled residents (Resident #5 and #6), who were alert, oriented, and able to make their own health care decisions, the Facility failed to ensure that they obtained signed written consent for the administration of psychotropic medications, which include providing each resident with information related to the risks and benefits of the medications, prior to administering them. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy Psychotropic Medication Use, dated as last revised 02/2025, indicated prior to the use of, increasing the dose of, or switching to a different psychotropic medication, the staff and physician will review the following with the resident/representative prior to obtaining documented consent or refusal; -Non-pharmacological alternatives; -Indications and rationale for the recommendation; -Potential risks and benefits (including possible side effects, adverse consequences, and black box warnings); and -The resident's/representative's right to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews, and observations for three of five sampled residents (Resident #1, #2 and #4) and three non-sampled residents (NS RT #A, #B and #C), the facility the Facility failed to ensure 1) that the call bell system button was accessible and within reach for residents to call for assistance and 2) that staff responded to sounding call bells in a timely manner, per facility policy. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Answering the Call Light, dated as last revised 9/2022, indicated that the purpose of answering a call light is to ensure timely response to the resident's requests and needs. The Policy further indicated that staff are to ensure that the call light is accessible to the resident when in bed, on the toilet, in the shower or bathing facility. 1) During a tour of the facility on 05/27/25, Surveyor #1 observed the following: -9:42 A.M., room [ROOM NUMBER], NS RT #A was in bed, the call bell was hanging on the wall, out of his/her reach -9:43 A.M., room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of six sampled residents, (Resident #3 and #5), the facility failed to ensure that upon admission, nursing developed and implemented baseline care plans with interventions, treatments, goals and outcomes that addressed the residents' overall immediate care needs. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Baseline Care Plans, dated as last revised 03/2022, indicated that a baseline care plan will be developed for each resident within 48-hours of admission to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs. The Policy further indicated the baseline care plan will be used until the staff can conduct the comprehensive assessment and develop an interdisciplinary person-centered comprehensive care plan. The baseline care plan is updated as needed to meet the residents' needs until the comprehensive care plan is developed. 1) Resident #3 was admitted to the Facility in May 2025, diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, Stage Four(IV, full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), who had experienced a change in condition related to an incident of elopement, the Facility failed to ensure that nursing notified Resident #2's Health Care Agent (HCA, Family Member #3 aka, his/her Resident Representative), when on 02/21/25 at approximately 5:45 A.M., an individual that had dropped off a staff member for work, found a person (later identified as Resident #2) outside the Facility sitting on the pavement in the middle of the facility's driveway, and Family Member #3 was not made until much later that day (around 2:00 P.M.) when she came into visit Resident #2 and questioned staff about the areas of bruising to Resident #2's knees. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated as last revised February 2021, indicated that the Facility promptly notifies the resident, his/her attending physician, and the resident's representative of changes in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews and for two of three unit kitchenettes, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a pest free environment, when live and dead cockroaches were observed during an environmental tour on the units. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Pest Control, dated as revised May 2008, indicated the Facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Review of the Pest Control Site Inspection Report, dated 11/01/24, indicated that there were cockroaches: -on monitors (location not specified); -behind the freezer (location not specified); -by the cart storage area (location not specified). Review of the Pest Control Invoice, dated 11/26/24, indicated that the following were treated for cockroaches: -room [ROOM NUMBER] on the Two [NAME] Unit; -room [ROOM NUMBER] on the Two East Unit; -the Activities Office; -room [ROOM NUMBER] on the Three [NAME] Unit had cockroaches on the monitors and in the bathroom.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and received two oral hypoglycemic medications daily, the Facility failed to ensure nursing developed and implemented an individualized comprehensive care plan with interventions, treatment goals and outcomes that addressed Resident #1's risk for hyper/hypoglycemia (high/low blood sugar). Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled, Care Plans Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated as revised December 2106, indicated the following: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; -the comprehensive person-centered care plan will incorporate identified problem areas, risk factors associated with identified problems, aid in preventing or reducing decline…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and received two oral hypoglycemic medications daily, the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff provided care and services that met professional standards of quality related to monitoring and assessment of Resident #1 for signs and symptoms of hyper/hypoglycemia (high/low blood sugar). Findings include: Standard Reference: Standard of Practice Reference: Pursuant to Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L), chapter 112, individuals are given the designation of registered nurse and practical nurse which includes the responsibility to provide nursing care. Pursuant to the Code of Massachusetts Regulation (CMR) 244, Rules and Regulations 3.02 and 3.04 define the responsibilities and functions of a registered nurse and practical nurse respectively. The regulations stipulate that both the registered nurse and practical nurse bear full responsibility for systematically assessing health status and recording the related health data. They also stipulate that both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had an activated Health Care Proxy (HCP), the Facility failed to ensure nursing immediately notified his/her Health Care Agent (HCA) and physician, when on 09/20/24, Resident #1 was found sitting on the floor after an unwitnessed fall. Resident #1 was noted with a closed, swollen, puffy right eye several hours later and was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated as revised February 2021, indicated the following: -our facility promptly notifies the resident's attending physician, the resident representative of change in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status; -the nurse will notify the resident's attending physician when there has been an accident or incident involving the resident, discovery of injuries of unknown source; -a nurse will notify the resident's representative when the resident is involved in any accident or incident that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Plans of Care indicated that he/she required the physical assistance of one staff member with transfers and ambulation, the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff consistently implemented and followed interventions identified in their Plans of Care, when on 09/20/24, a short time after Resident #1 had been found on the floor by staff after an unwitnessed fall, Nurse #1 witnessed Resident #1 walking in his/her room, unassisted, and did not intervene to assist him/her, did not notify a staff member that he/she was ambulating in his/her room without assistance and proceeded to leave the facility and go home. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, dated as revised December 2016, indicated the following: -an comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -the Facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was severely cognitively impaired, required supervision to substantial/maximal assistance from staff to meet his/her care needs, and was assessed by nursing as being at high risk for falls, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided nursing care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, when on 09/20/24, after Resident #1 was found lying on the floor in his/her room by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 after an unwitnessed fall, CNA #1 proceeded get him/her up off the floor, walk him/her to the bathroom and then transfer him/her back to bed, before informing and having nursing assess him/her for any potential injury. After being made aware of Resident #1's unwitnessed fall, Nurse #1 did not assess Resident #1 for injuries, did not document the incident, did not complete an incident report, did not report the incident to his/her physician, or the oncoming shift nurse. Findings include: Standard Reference: Standard of Practice Reference: Pursuant to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was severely cognitively impaired and was assessed by nursing at high risk for falls, the Facility failed to ensure staff provided quality of care consistent with professional standards of practice, when on 09/20/24, after finding Resident #1 lying on the floor in his/her room after an unwitnessed fall, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 got him/her up off the floor, proceeded to walk with him/her to the bathroom and transfer him/her back to bed, before informing and having the nurse assess him/her for the potential for physical injury, and as a result, Resident #1 was found in bed the next morning with a swollen, puffy, closed right eye and was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation. Findings include: Review of a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Job Description, dated 2003, indicated the following: -the primary purpose of your job position is to provide each of your assigned residents with routine daily nursing care and services in accordance with the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to honor a choice of smoking for two Residents (#424 and #425), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Smoking Policy; Residents, revised 10/25/22, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Prior to, and upon admission, residents are informed of the Center's smoking policies including the location of designated outdoor smoking area(s) if any, and the extent to which the Center can accommodate their smoking or non-smoking preferences. -If the Center permits outdoor smoking in designated areas and time, then residents who express a desire to smoke are evaluated to determine their ability to make informed decisions regarding smoking, accepting liability for any smoking-related harm(s) and follow safety protocols, with or without supervision. -Matches, lighters, electronic cigarettes, and vaping devices are not stored in resident rooms regardless of a resident's level of cognition. The purpose of this policy is to: -Ensure that residents who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, test tray results, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff served food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature for 2 out of 2 test trays conducted. Findings include: During initial resident screening on 8/8/24, the residents expressed the following concerns about the food served at the facility: -Food that was served was not often hot -The food was served cool to warm -The food was sometimes cold -The food was not palatable and was ice cold most of the time. On 8/12/24 at 1:40 P.M., the residents at the Resident Group Meeting expressed concern regarding the palatability of the food served at the facility with concerns that included but was not limited to: -The food leaves a lot to be desired -Some of the food looked like vomit -The portions were terrible reports that he/she received one chicken wing cut in half as their protein serving -Chicken with pieces of bone in it had been served During an interview on 8/12/24 at 11:20 A.M., Resident #22 said over the weekend the food was terrible. Resident #22 said on 8/11/24 the residents were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff accommodate food preferences for two Residents (#18 and #37), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #18, the facility failed to offer preferred food and portion size requested by the Resident, which included scrambled eggs and double meal portions. 2. For Resident #37, the facility failed to honor the Resident's preferences and served the Resident foods that he/she disliked, including coffee and oatmeal, on a daily basis. Findings include: 1. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive and ileostomy status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/9/24, indicated Resident #18 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated the Resident had the ability to make his/herself understood and had the ability to understand others with clear comprehension. The MDS also indicated the Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to follow their policy and professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure two of four-unit kitchenettes were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition; and 2. Ensure food items were properly labeled, dated, and stored four of four-unit kitchenettes. Findings include: 1. Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -3-305.11 (A) Except as specified in paragraphs (B) and (C) of this section, food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food (1) in a clean, dry location. -4-602.11 (D) Equipment is used for storage of packaged or unpackaged food such as a reach-in refrigerator and the equipment is cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. -6-501.12 (A) Physical facilities shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four Residents (#59, #104, #1A, and #74) of 25 sampled residents and for three of four units in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #59, ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) as required for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes) while providing direct care to a Resident requiring tube feeding; 2. For Residents #104 and #1A, ensure staff wore PPE as required for contact precautions (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of infections) while providing care; and 3. For Resident #74, ensure staff wore PPE as required for Isolation Precautions (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of infections) while in his/her room. Findings include: Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were reviewed and followed-up on for one Resident (#44), out of 25 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the wishes for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) were pursued as legally allowed for Resident #110. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Advanced Directives, dates as revised in [DATE], indicated the following: -Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)- indicates that, in case of respiratory or cardiac failure, the resident, legal guardian, health care proxy, or representative has directed that no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or other life-sustaining treatments or methods are to be used. - Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident, his/her family members and/or his or her legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives -The plan of care for each resident is consistent with his or her documented treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Physician/Practitioner was notified of a change in treatment for one Resident (#59), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Physician/Practitioner was notified when an antibiotic prescribed to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) was not available from the pharmacy and administered as ordered. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled Miscellaneous Special Situations, Unavailable Medications, dated February 2019, indicated that medications used by residents in the Nursing Facility may be unavailable for dispensing from the pharmacy on occasion. The Policy indicated that the Facility must make every effort to ensure that medications were available to meet the needs of each resident. The Policy indicated that nursing staff shall notify the attending Physician of the situation and explain the circumstances, expected availability, and optional therapy/therapies that are available. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 and diagnoses including a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff developed a baseline or comprehensive care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission, which included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for two Residents (#424 and #425), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #424, to develop a baseline care plan for the Resident's diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and sarcoidosis; and 2.For Resident #425, to develop and implement a baseline care plan related to falls. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy title Care Plans - Baseline, last revised March 2022, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy Statement: A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. -The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care and must include the minimum healthcare information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care and services consistent with accepted standards of clinical practice for two Residents (#59 and #47), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #59, a. the Physician's order for antibiotics to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) was implemented timely which resulted in a delay in treatment and was administered for the duration of the order; and b. the Physician's order was followed for tube feeding (a medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth, are unable to swallow safely, or need nutritional supplementation) and measuring gastric volume; 2. For Resident #425, care and treatment to the Resident's implanted cardiac pacemaker met professional standards of quality. Findings include: 1. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 and diagnoses including a history of a stroke, chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#65), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to fully develop and implement interdisciplinary care plans related to his/her dominant language of Cantonese and failed to implement their Limited English Proficiency policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Communication with Persons with Limited English Proficiency, last revised October 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: - It is the policy of this Center to: -take reasonable steps to ensure that persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) have meaningful access and an equal opportunity to participate in our services, activities, programs and other benefits. -All interpreters, translators and other aids needed to comply with this policy shall be provided without cost…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview for one Resident (#276) of 25 sampled residents the facility failed to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status were maintained. Specifically, for Resident #276 a resident with nutritional risk factors, the facility failed to timely obtain a reweigh when significant weight loss was identified. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated as revised March 2022, indicated but was not limited to: -residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team such as: weekly for four weeks, then monthly unless otherwise indicated or as ordered -weights are recorded in each individual's medical record -any weight change of 5 pounds or more in a patient weighing more than 100 pounds or of 2 pounds in a patient weighing less than 100 pounds since the last weight assessment will be retaken for verification. If the weight is verified, nursing notifies the dietitian -the dietitian will respond timely to a verified significant weight change -the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews and observations for one of four sampled resident care units (2 East), the Facility failed to ensure food and beverages provided to the residents were served at safe and appetizing temperatures, when on 05/28/24, results of test trays observations indicated that the food items were not served at appetizing temperatures, and some foods items were not palatable. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Food Temperatures, undated, indicated that hot foods should be maintained at a minimum of 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and cold foods should be maintained at a maximum of 40 degrees F. Review of the Facility Policy titled Food Safety, undated, indicated temperatures of food will be monitored daily and be in compliance with the Department of Public Health Guidelines in the fold service department. Review of the Resident Council Group meeting minutes held on 04/16/24 at 1:30 P.M., with eight residents in attendance, indicated the residents voiced complaints about food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed, interviews and observations for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure nursing provided care and services that met professional standards, when on 05/28/24, nursing failed to follow acceptable standards of practice related to medication administration. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Administrating Medications, dated as last revised 04/2019, indicated that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. The Policy further indicated the following; -The individual administering the medication verifies the resident's identity before administering any medication; -The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dose, right time and right method of administration before giving the medication; and -Medications ordered for a particular resident may not be administered to another resident, unless permitted by State law and facility policy, and approved by the Director of Nurses. Resident #1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nourishment kitchenettes were maintained in a clean sanitary manner to prevent potential foodborne illness for 4 out of 4 nourishment kitchenettes. Findings include: On 5/22/2023 at 3:37 P.M., the surveyor toured the four kitchenettes and made the following observations: 3 East Unit nourishment kitchenette: -Shelves that stored the bottles of juices and soda was sticky with a thick layer gelled type of liquid. -Styrofoam take out container on top of the microwave, not labeled or dated. -Floor was sticky with visible food particles and dirt. 3 [NAME] Unit nourishment kitchenette: -Beside the refrigerator was a sticky pest trap with a cockroache and sugar pack stuck to it and paper trash. -Behind the refrigerator was plastic silverware, empty water bottles, sugar packets, butter containers and the floor was visible dirty. -Microwave front panel was rusting out along bottom portion. -Inside the microwave, the top and right side was dirty with food debris. -Under the sink there was a quarter filled bottle of apple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a medication cart was locked, 2) medications were stored (refrigerated), and dated once opened, according to manufacturer's guidelines in three out of seven medication carts and 3) medication room was maintained according to facility policy. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, dated as revised November 2020, indicated but was not limited to: - Medication Labeling: Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial.) - Multi-dose vials that are not opened or accessed are discarded according to the manufacturer's expiration. Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated as revised August 2022, indicated but was not limited to: - The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. - Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and test tray results, the facility failed to ensure foods and beverages were prepared by methods which conserved nutritional value, flavor, appearance, palatability, and appetizing temperatures for one of two test trays observed. Findings include: During an interview on 5/21/23 at 8:51 A.M., Resident #114 said the food was not so good, no flavor and was cold. During an interview on 5/21/23 at 8:26 A.M., Resident #276 said the food was terrible, the hot dog last night wasn't even cooked, it was cold. During an interview on 5/21/23 at 10:29 A.M., Resident #56 said the food was bad, same old stuff all the time pasta and chicken. He/she said the hamburger was cold and the cheese wasn't even melted. During an interview on 5/21/23 at 10:47 A.M., Resident #21 said the food was plain and the temperature was terrible. During an interview on 5/21/23 at 2:03 P.M., Resident #34 said the food was not even luke warm. During an interview on 5/21/23 at 2:10 P.M., Resident #62 said the food was most often cold. On 5/23/23 at 7:35 A.M., the surveyor observed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were informed and given necessary information to make health care decisions including the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications prior to their use for one Resident (#20) out of a total sample of 28 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychopharmacologic Medication Policy, last revised on 9/6/2018, indicated but was not limited to: - Prior to administering [a listed/specified] psychotropic medication, a facility shall obtain the informed written consent of the resident, the resident's health care proxy (HCP) or the resident's guardian. - Written informed consent must be obtained each time a new or renewed prescription falls outside the dosage to which the resident or the resident's legal representative previously consented, or once a year, whichever is shorter. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on January, 2022, with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented for two Residents (#33 and #4), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) For Resident #33 implement bilateral quarter side rails used for mobility and security; and, 2) For Resident #4 ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for a resident receiving Dialysis treatment. Findings include: 1. Resident was admitted to the facility 12/19/2019 with diagnosis which included, schizophrenia, conversion disorder with seizures/convulsions, and stroke. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/28/2023, indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #33's care plan indicated the following: -Activity of daily living self-care deficit related to physical limitations related to decline in functional mobility initiated 12/30/2019. -Interventions, bilateral quarter side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medication which met professional standards of care for one Resident (#21) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, staff failed to follow the Physician's order, and administered medication when the Resident's blood pressure was outside the Physician's ordered parameters. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, dated 5/21/19, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. -The policy indicated medications are administered in accordance of physician's order. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility April 2023 with diagnoses which included heart failure and orthostatic hypotension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/1/23, indicated Resident #21 could make self understood and understood others. Review of the Physician's order, dated 5/15/23, indicated: -Midodrine (medication used to treat low blood pressure) HCl Oral Tablet 2.5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided appropriate care and services related to indwelling urinary catheter drainage bags for one Resident (#120) who required an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube placed through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, dated as revised August 2022, indicated but was not limited to: -To prevent urinary catheter-associated complicates, including urine tract infections to be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Resident #120 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnoses which included cerebral infraction, sepsis, muscle weakness, urinary tract infection, hypertension, anxiety and urine retention. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/4/23, indicated Resident #120 required an indwelling urinary catheter. On 5/21/23 at 9:10 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #120's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag. The catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure enteral nutrition provided via a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a feeding tube in the abdomen used to provide nutrition) was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#120 and #52), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, 1.) For Resident #120, nursing administered an enteral nutrition formula which was not correct, the bottle was undated and therefor unable to ensure the enteral nutrition was not expired and 2.) For Resident #52, the enteral bottle was undated and therefor unable to ensure the enteral nutrition was not expired. Review of the facility policy titled, Enteral Feedings - Safety Precautions, dated as [DATE], indicated but was not limited to the following: -To ensure the safe administration of enteral nutrition: *Preparation 1. All personnel responsible for preparing, storing and administering enteral nutrition formulas will be trained, qualified and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of an intravenous catheter, consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#227) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #227, the facility failed to flush his/her intravenous device to maintain patency. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Maintaining Patency of Peripheral and Central Vascular Access Devices, dated 8/16, indicated, but was not limited to: -All vascular access devices should be flushed routinely when not in use to maintain patency. Review of the facility policy titled, Infusion Therapy Procedures Flush Chart, dated 8/16, indicated but was not limited to: -For a tunneled Catheter at a minimum should be flushed with 10 milliliters (mL) of saline pre- use, post-use, every eight hours and as needed. Resident #227 was admitted to the facility May 2023 with diagnoses which included laminectomy (a surgical procedure performed on the spine) and surgical wound infection. Review of the medical record indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment according to professional standards of practice for 1 Resident (#120) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings include: Resident #120 was admitted to the facility April 2023 with diagnoses which included cerebral infraction, sepsis, muscle weakness, urinary tract infection, hypertension, anxiety and urine retention. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/4/23, indicated Resident #120 had no speech, was rarely/ never understood and could rarely/ never make self-understood. Review of the MDS indicated Resident #120 required tracheostomy care and oxygen administration. On 5/22/23 at 6:42 A.M., 5/22/23 at 10:59 A.M. and 5/22/23 at 3:36 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #120's oxygen tubing attached to the wall with oxygen flowing to his/her tracheostomy. The tubing was in a basin on the floor and was intertwined with an indwelling urinary catheter bag with urine in the bag. Review of the physician's order, dated 4/5/23, indicated: -Cool mist aerosol via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when 2 out of 3 nurses observed made 2 errors out of 25 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 8%. Those errors impacted 2 Residents (#115 and #21) out of 3 residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, dated 5/21/19, indicated, but was not limited to the following: -Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The policy indicated medications are administered in accordance of physician's order and the individual administering the medication will verify the dose. On at 5/22/23 at 8:00 A.M., the Surveyor observed Nurse #1 prepare and administer medications for Resident #115 including: -Miralax (medication used for constipation), mixed in 4 ounces of water. Nurse #1 measured the dose in the cap up to the first line. Further review indicated Nurse #1 did not measure to the line in the cap with the arrow indicating a full dose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#276) was free from a significant medication error, out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, Resident #276 was administered the physician's ordered antibiotic daily at 9:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M., and 5:00 P.M.; for 26 doses instead of every eight hours as indicated by the hospital discharge summary. Findings include: Resident #276 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with diagnoses which included diabetes, gangrene and bacteremia (infection in the blood). Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/17/23, indicated Resident #276 required intravenous therapy. Review of the hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE] , indicated for nursing to administer Cefepime (antibiotic medication) 2,000 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) every eight hours. Review of the nursing note, dated 5/12/23, indicated [cefepime] not arrived from the pharmacy, rescheduled time and notified physician. Review of the Physician's order dated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed facility policy for proper Enhanced Barrier Precautions in an effort to help prevent the possible transmission of diseases and infections, such as multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) for two Residents (#73 and #115) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated August 2022, indicated the following: - Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. - Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring use of gown and gloves for EBPs include dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care of use (central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator, etc.) and wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in the main kitchen in working order. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the dishwasher sanitation rise temperature reached 180 degrees Fahrenheit as required for sanitation process to be completed; and, 2. Ensure the steam oven was repaired in a timely manner. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 5/22/23 at 1:32 P.M., the Food Service Manager (FSM) said the dishwasher was a high temperature machine. He said the wash cycle should be 160 Fahrenheit (F) and the the sanitation temperature is 180 degrees F. On 5/22/23 at 1:40 P.M., the surveyor observed the dietary staff operating the dishwasher for lunch service dishes. The wash temperature was observed to be 160 degrees F and the sanitation was observed to 160 degrees F. The surveyor reviewed the dishwasher temperature logs, which indicated the wash cycle consistently at 160 degrees F and the sanitation was consistently 180 to 183 degrees F. The surveyor observed a total of five sets of dishes run through the dishwasher with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-08-14 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written documentation related to transfer discharge notices and bed hold upon hospitalizations or discharge for three Residents (#142, #143, and #9), out of a total of 32 sampled residents and 3 closed records.Findings include: Review of the facility’s policy titled Transfer or Discharge Notices, dated as revised March 2025 indicated but was not limited to: A. Notice of Transfer or Discharge (Anticipated) - under the following circumstances, the notice of transfer is given as soon as it is practicable but before the transfer or discharge: The health and/or safety of individuals in the facility would be endangered due to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident; the resident's health improves sufficiently to allow a more immediate transfer or discharge; an immediate transfer or discharge is required by the residents urgent medical needs; or a resident has not resided in the facility for 30 days -The resident and representative are notified in writing of the following information: The specific reason for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.4 | -2.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 36 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THCI OF MASSACHUSETTS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2003 |
| CARE REALTY, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/30/2002 |
| DES-I 2016 GRAT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2021 |
| STRAUS, DANIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2003 |
| BARUCH, DAVID | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2021 |
| HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2003 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225356. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.