Care One At Weymouth

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 802 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 332 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 154.4 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly -0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), who was newly admitted related to his/her need for skilled nursing services, the Facility failed to ensure it provided treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of quality care, when during two separate Physician's visits, his/her provider indicated there were new treatment and/or medication orders for Resident #1, however they were not transcribed and entered as a Physicians order in a timely manner.Findings include:Based on the Facility Policy titled Medication and Treatment Orders, dated as last revised 07/2016, indicated orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing.The Policy further indicated the following;-Medications shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duty licensed and authorized to prescribe such medication in this State;-Drugs and biological orders must be recorded on the Physician's Order sheet in the resident's chart; and-All drugs and biological orders shall be written,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #2), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate medical/treatment records when nursing documentation nursing on his/her Medication Administration Record (MAR) and/or Treatment Administration Record (TAR) were omitted, with some care areas left blank.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Charting and Documentation, dated as last revised July 2017, indicated that all services provided to the resident, progress towards the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the residents medical record, The Medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the residents condition and response to care.The Facility indicated medication administration and treatments or services performed must be documented in the resident's medical record.Resident #2 was admitted to the Facility in 11/2025 diagnoses include a urinary tract infection, status post…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen for one Resident (#56), from a total sample of 28 residents, was free of unnecessary drugs. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure two oral antibiotic medications (Doxycycline and Amoxicillin/Clavulanate) were not given in excessive duration resulting in the Resident receiving five unnecessary doses of oral antibiotics while on intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors, last revised June 2025, indicated but was not limited to:-A medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not accordance with provider's orders, manufacturer's specifications, or accepted professional standards and principles of the professional(s) providing services.-Examples of medication errors include: -unauthorized drug- a drug administered without a provider's order. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control practices. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure proper cleaning of resident shared equipment between resident use; and2. Ensure effective hand hygiene practices and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) were utilized when entering and exiting resident rooms, including residents on transmission-based precautions (implemented in addition to standard precautions in order to prevent or control infections.), to prevent the potential spread of infection. Findings include:1. Review of the facility's policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment, last revised September 2022, indicated but was not limited to:-Resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment will be cleaned and disinfected according to current CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) recommendations for disinfection and the OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) Bloodborne Pathogens Standard.-Reusable items are cleaned and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Resident's Physician or Nurse Practitioner about a medication error to re-evaluate the potential need to alter the treatment plan for one Resident (#56), from a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the Physician or Nurse Practitioner of Resident #56 receiving five doses of two antibiotics.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors, last revised June 2025, indicated but was not limited to:-A medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not in accordance with provider's orders, manufacturer's specifications, or accepted professional standards and principles of the professional(s) providing services.-Examples of medication errors include:-unauthorized drug- a drug administered without a provider's order.-Promptly notify the provider of any significant error or adverse consequences. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with diagnoses including acute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC-a flexible tube inserted through a vein in one's arm and passed through to larger veins near the heart, used to deliver medications intravenously (IV)), consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#56), out of a total of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to change the PICC dressing per professional standards. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Changes, last revised June 2025, indicated but was not limited to the following:- The purpose of the procedure is to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy, including catheter-related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled, or well dressings.- Maintain sterile dressing (transparent semi-permeable membrane (TSM) dressing or sterile gauze) dressing for all central vascular access devices.- Change the dressing if it becomes damp, loosened or visibly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#18), in a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assist Resident #18 in their request for discharge planning. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Discharge Summary and Plan, revised in March 2025, indicated the following:-every resident has an individualized discharge plan, which begins at admission and is part of the comprehensive care plan-the discharge plan is based on the resident assessment, the goals for care, the desire for discharge and the resident's capacity for discharge-residents are periodically assessed for their interest in returning to the community-if the resident indicates an interest in returning to the community, the facility determines if appropriate and adequate support is in place-the facility makes referrals to local agencies, the local ombudsman, and support services that can assist in accommodating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when one of two nurses observed during the medication pass failed to follow physician orders for an antiseizure medication. Specifically, for Resident #66, with a history of epilepsy (a brain disease that causes repeated seizures due to abnormal electrical signals in the brain), Nurse #1 failed to administer the correct dose of his/her anticonvulsant medication (drugs that control or prevent seizures by calming excessive electrical activity in the brain). Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, dated as revised April 2019, indicated but was not limited to:-Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders Review of Up To Date (an evidence-based clinical resource), Antiseizure medication maintenance therapy and drug monitoring, dated as revised 12/29/2025, indicated but was not limited to:-Studies have shown that those taking therapeutic doses of Levetiracetam have levels in the order of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained complete and accurate medical records for one Resident (#153), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #153, the facility failed to ensure his/her medical record included his/her weight results.Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated as revised March 2022, indicated but was not limited to:-Weights are recorded in each individual's medical record Resident #153 was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with diagnoses which included bacteremia (bacteria in the bloodstream) and sepsis (the body's reaction to extreme infection). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/23/25, indicated Resident #153 was 71 inches tall, weighed 155 pounds, and had no weight loss or gain. Review of Resident #153's Physician's Orders indicated but were not limited to:-weight every Monday for three weeks, start date 12/22/25 Review of Resident #153's December 2025 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) indicated but was not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of four sampled residents (Resident #4), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained Resident #4's right to privacy and confidentiality related to his/her Protected Health Information (PHI), when one of Resident #4's provider progress notes, which contained (PHI) was included in another resident's discharge paperwork and the Facility only became aware after the discharged residents' family member called and notified the Facility.Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Use and Discloser of Health Information, dated as last revised 09/12/2013, indicated that the Center respects the importance of its residents' personal privacy, and understands the sensitive nature of its residents' health information. The Policy further indicated that the Center also recognizes that Federal and State laws require that individually identifiable health information must be safeguarded against improper use or disclosure. During a telephone interview on 11/25/25 at 10:08…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA