Careone At Livingston
68 Passaic Avenue, Livingston, NJ 07039 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (973) 758-9000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (11% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.2% | 8.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 4.6% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.9% | 0.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.7% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 50.9% | 12.1% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 2.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.4% | 8.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.5% | 18.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 11.7% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.1% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.5% | 12.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.4% | 80.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.6% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.3% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.00 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.16 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 297 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 136 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.77 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.5%CMS range 48.8–62.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 9.3–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 93.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 5.8–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 66.8 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 53 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 11% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ # 2599517 Based on interview and review of medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure there was no delay in implementing a physician recommendation for a burn treatment, and failed to ensure the treatment was ordered for the physician recommended frequency. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for treatment orders (Resident #1) and was evidenced by the following:On 10/23/2025 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for Resident #1 which revealed the following: The admission Record (an admission summary) Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to; alcohol abuse with intoxication, anxiety disorder, bariatric surgery, burns, skin grafts on 79% total body surface area (TBSA) for 2nd and 3rd degree burns. The admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool dated 8/14/25, indicated that Resident #1 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Basic Interview for Mental status which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) a resident who was identified as being at Low Risk for developing pressure ulcers did not develop a pressure ulcer, and b) upon the identification of a facility acquired pressure ulcer, a documented wound assessment was completed and new interventions were implemented to prevent further skin breakdown. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wounds/skin treatments (Resident #3) and was evidenced by the following:On 10/23/25 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the Electronic Medical Record for Resident #3 which revealed the following: A Nursing Progress note dated 7/28/25 at 15:02 (3:02 PM), documented Resident #3 had blanchable thick hard indurated skin on the Left buttock. The skin was not open and no pain was present. The Physician and family were made aware. There was no documented wound assessment completed upon identification of the wound. A Progress Note documented by the Advanced Practice Nurse as a Late Entry and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI manual), the facility failed to ensure that three residents out of three resident (Resident (R) 28, R50 and R67) out of 22 sampled residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted in a timely manner.Findings include:Review of Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-term Care Facility Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/23 revealed, Chapter 2: Assessments for the Resident Assessment Instrument, 2.6: Required OBRA Assessments for the MDS.RAI OBRA-required assessment summary for.discharge return not anticipated assessment.MDS completion date (Z0500B) no later than discharge date + 14 calendar days.Transmission date no later than MDS completion date + 14 calendar days.for annual assessment.MDS completion date no later than Assessment Reference Date (ARD) + 14 calendar days.Transmission date no later than care plan completion date + 14 calendar days.for quarterly assessment.MDS completion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 22 sampled residents (Resident (R)4) was provided with a meaningful, individualized activity program. R4 was not further assessed when the Minimum Data Set (MDS) triggered and indicated she had little interest/pleasure in doing things. The MDS indicated a care plan would be developed to address the care area of activities; however, this was not completed. R4's interests were not fully assessed and she did not have an activity program in place based on her interests and needs. This created the potential for R4 to have a decreased quality of life.Findings include:Review of the facility's Activity Evaluation policy dated February 2023 and provided by the facility revealed, In order to promote the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of residents, an activity evaluation is conducted and maintained for each resident at least quarterly and with any change of condition that could affect his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one out of five residents (Resident (R)70) reviewed for nutrition out of a total of 22 residents was provided with a therapeutic minced and moist diet texture as prescribed by the Physician. R70 was served regular texture food which created the potential for choking or aspiration (accidentally inhaling food or liquid into the airway).Findings include:Review of the facility's Therapeutic Diets policy dated October 2017 and provided by the facility revealed, Therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care and in accordance with his or her goals and preferences.Review of the undated admission Record in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Review of the EMR revealed that as of the survey, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of six residents (Residents (R) 72) reviewed for medication administration out of a sample of 22 residents received medications from the pharmacy as ordered by the physician for administration. This failure had the potential to cause residents to have unmet care needs. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication and Treatment Orders, dated July 2016 revealed, Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing.Drugs and biologicals that are required to be refilled must be reordered from the issuing pharmacy not less than three (3) days prior to the last dosage being administered to ensure that refills are readily available.Review of R72's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Face Sheet tab revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including wedge compression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate for two out of two residents (Resident (R)4 and R71) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLS) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Neither R4 nor R71 had received a tub bath or shower since admission; their medical records indicated they had received tub baths and/or showers. This created the potential for residents not to receive necessary care because their records indicated they had already received the care.Findings include: Review of the facility's Charting and Documentation policy dated July 2017 and provided by the facility revealed, All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facility communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) electronically transmit the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care of all residents, within 14 days of completing the resident's assessment and in accordance with the Center's for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 24 residents (Resident #25, 26, and #39), and b.) complete the discharge assessment for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #48) reviewed for resident assessment. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 3/4/24 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 out of bed in a wheelchair, alert and oriented, sitting in the activity room. The surveyor reviewed Resident #25's medical record. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) (AR) documented that Resident #25 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards by not ensuring administration of a medication, (Procrit)(an injectable medication used to stimulate bone marrow to produce more red blood cells), according to a physician's order. This occurred for one (1) of five (5) residents, (Resident #21), reviewed for medication management. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the medication administration observation on 3/6/24, the surveyor observed four (4) nurses administer medications to six (6) residents. There were 25 opportunities, and three (3) errors were observed which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 12%. This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of six (6) residents, (Resident #26 and an unsampled resident), that were administered medications by two (2) of four (4) nurses that were observed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 3/6/24 at 7:56 AM, during the medication administration observation, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN #1) preparing to administer medications to an unsampled resident which included a tablet of Glipizide 5 milligrams (mg) (a medication used to treat diabetes). The surveyor observed LPN #1 administer the medication to the resident and observed there was no meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 7 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0620 — isolatedNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C: #NJ00166633 Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/8/23, 11/9/23, 11/13/23, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the facility's policy titled, admission Agreement (AG). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 (Resident #3) residents reviewed as evidenced by the following: According to the facility admission Record (AR), Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Spinal Stenosis, Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes. Resident was discharged on 8/11/2023. The facility was unable to provide Resident #3's AG. On 11/9/23 at 11:59 a.m., the surveyors interviewed the facility's admission Director (AD) who stated, AG for Resident # 3 can't be found. On 11/9/23 at 1:23 p.m., the surveyors interviewed the Administrator (LNHA) and AD. LNHA stated, I'm unable to locate Resident # 3's AG. The AD stated, there should be an AG done, but I can't to find it. A review of the facility's policy titled, admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY COMPLAINT # NJ00166633 Based on interviews, and review of medical records (MR) and other facility documentation on 11/8/23, 11/9/23, and 11/13/23, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident's representative (RR) a 30-day written notice in advance of an impending discharge prior to the facility-initiated discharge. In addition, the facility failed to follow their policy on Discharging the Resident and admission Agreement who was discharged on 8/10/23 and 8/14/23 for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #3 and #4) reviewed for discharge. This deficient practice is evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed facility 8/1/23 to 11/8/23 Discharges on 11/8/23. The 8/2023 Discharges revealed that Residents #3 was discharged from the facility (F1) to another facility (F2) on 8/10/23 and Residents #4 was discharged from the facility (F1) to another facility (F3) on 8/14/23. Review of the facility policy titled Discharging the Resident, edited on 4/28/17, reflected Purpose The purpose of this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/8/23, 11/9/23, 11/13/23, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care. This deficient practice was identified for one 1 of 6 (Resident #3) residents reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission record (AR), Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 8/10/23, with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Dementia and Difficulty in Walking. A review of Resident #3's care plan documented Resident #3 is a long-term care (LTC) resident, initiated on 4/29/21. A review of the Progress Notes (PN) dated 5/3/23 at 11:08 a.m. documented under Care Conference Note, Resident #3 remains appropriate for LTC. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (Q/MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated 7/23/23, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for oxygen therapy for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care, Resident # 32. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/13/21 at 10:39 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #32 sitting in the hallway in a wheelchair by the window looking out. The resident was wearing oxygen via a nasal cannula (a tube in the opening of the nostrils that delivers oxygen). The surveyor was unable to see the setting on the portable oxygen concentrator. On 12/14/21 at 10:04 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #32 in the doorway of their room, seated in a wheelchair, without the nasal cannula on, it was hanging off one ear. The surveyor asked the resident if they needed help putting it on. The resident said no, I can do it, it just takes time. On 12/14/21 at 10:19 AM, the surveyor observed the resident sitting in their wheelchair at the end of the hall looking out the French doors to the outside field. The resident was wearing the nasal cannula at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store medication at the appropriate temperature and failed to store controlled substances in a manner that would prevent loss or diversion. This was found with 1 of 2 medication refrigerators inspected. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/14/21 at 11:31 AM, the surveyor inspected the Medication refrigerator in the med room on the Sub Acute unit with Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN #1). There was an unopened box that contained one single dose pre-filled syringe of Invega Sustenna (an extended-release injection used to treat schizophrenia). On the box the storage instructions read: Store at room temperature 77 degrees Fahrenheit. The temperature in the refrigerator was 42 degrees. LPN #1 confirmed that the Invega should not have been stored in the refrigerator. Further inspection found a locked narcotic box attached to a shelf that was removable. LPN #1 did not have the key to the narcotic box. LPN # 2 opened the narcotic box. Inside of the box was an unopened 30 ml bottle of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-04 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide coordination between facility staff and hospice agency staff to meet the resident's nursing needs. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #136) reviewed for hospice/end of life care and was evidenced by the following. On 12/13/21 at 11:47 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #136 awake and alert in bed. A review of the resident's hybrid medical record revealed the following information: According to the admission Record the resident was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to esophageal cancer and status post feeding tube insertion. The 11/30/21 admission Minimum Data Set assessment tool indicated the resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 and was enrolled in a hospice program. The 12/4/21 facility hospice care plan included interventions to provide comfort and supportive care and hospice staff visitation to provide care, assistance, and evaluations. The resident's paper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate measures to prevent and control the spread of infection. This deficient practice was observed with 1 of 1 Lab Technician and 1 of 1 dietary aide and was as evidenced by the following: On 12/14/21 at 9:10 AM, the surveyor observed a Lab Technician (LT) enter a resident's room wearing two surgical masks and no eye protection. The LT placed a large bag which contained her supplies on the bed next to the resident. The LT put gloves on her hands with no hand hygiene first and then drew the resident's blood. The LT then took her cell phone out of her pocket with her gloved hand and put it to her face to answer a phone call. The LT placed the phone back into her pocket and removed her gloves. The LT did not perform hand hygiene when she removed her gloves. The LT took the bag of supplies and walked down the hallway to another resident's room. At 9:15 AM, the surveyor observed the LT enter another resident's room, still wearing two surgical masks and no eye protection. The LT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 36 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARE ONE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/01/2004 |
| STRAUS, DANIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/09/2001 |
| DES 2009 GST TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2021 |
| DES HOLDING CO., INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 24% | since 09/01/2004 |
| DES-C 2009 GRAT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 21% | since 10/26/2009 |
| BARUCH, DAVID | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2021 |
| CARE ONE MANAGEMENT, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2004 |
| HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/28/2008 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315479. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.