No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

CareOne at New Milford

800 River Road, New Milford, NJ 07646 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 236 certified beds · (201) 967-1700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (201) 967-1700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$15,334 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (13% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,334 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-06)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
880 River Rd · (201) 225-2101 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
880 River Rd · (201) 225-2101 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Park
550 Riverside Way · (201) 599-6295 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.8%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%4.6%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.2%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.8%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.3%18.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.1%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.6%12.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%80.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.6%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.9%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.522.071.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.681.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 158 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 128 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.0%CMS range 49.6–64.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.2–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 5.1–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.481.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.62
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.60
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.76
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
13.1%
Total nursing turnover
10.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 236 beds and averages 182.8 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 53 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.76 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.546 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.60 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.92 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 13% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-06)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ: #166361; #173486 Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately assess a cognitively impaired resident, with a history of elopement as an elopement risk, and implement interventions to prevent the resident from exiting a secured unit, subsequently the facility, which resulted in the resident eloping on 7/29/23. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for elopement (Resident #123). On 7/29/23, Resident #123 who was cognitively impaired and ambulated independently with a history of elopement, eloped from the facility and was last seen by staff at 5:30 PM, in the television (TV) room. At 6:00 PM, the Registered Nurse (RN #1) could not locate the resident, and a code gray was called, and the facility began to search for the resident. The local police department and the police department from the adjacent town were called. The police from the adjacent town went to the resident's last known home address to conduct a wellness check and located the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure staff signed the resident's medical records as medications and treatments provided for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #47). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/24/26 at 9:50 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #47 lying in bed with enteral feeding in place. On 6/25/26 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #47. A review of the admission Record or face sheet (an admission summary) revealed diagnoses which included, but were not limited to; late effects of cerebral infarction, aphasia following cerebral infarction, dysphagia, dementia, epilepsy, hypertension, and gastrostomy status. A review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/5/26, indicated the resident was rarely or never understood, and had a tube feeding (TF). A review of the physician orders, dated as of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: 2712392, 2983958 Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to ensure a criminal background check (CBC) was completed prior to hire for one of three staff (Business Office Manager) reviewed for CBCs. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 05/15/2026, the surveyor reviewed three employee files which revealed the following: Review of the employee file for the Business Office Manager (BOM) revealed a date of hire (DOH) of 04/22/2013. Further review of the BOM's employee file revealed a CBC dated 05/07/2026. An interview was conducted with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) on 05/15/2026 at 3:55 PM. The LNHA stated that the facility's BOM was hired in 2013 and transferred to the facility from another facility in the network. The LNHA stated that a CBC should have been done on the BOM before she was hired but it could not be located, so one was completed on 05/07/2026. The LNHA stated that it would make sense to have someone in the role of BOM with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a safe, clean, and homelike environment. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 32 residents, (Residents #41, #56, and #107), observed during environmental tour and medication administration. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. During the initial tour of the 2nd-floor unit on 2/24/2025 at 10:49 AM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) observed Resident #107's room with no privacy curtain and the ankle-foot orthosis (AFO, is a hard brace worn on the lower leg that improves overall walking safety and efficiency for people with certain medical conditions) in the windowsill. At that same time, the surveyor observed the resident lying on the bed and informed S#1 that they had weakness to the left side of their body due to stroke and claimed difficulty with walking. S#1 reviewed the medical records of Resident #107 and revealed: A review of the admission Record (AR, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ#166361 Complaint NJ#173486 Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) and the Ombudsman's office when a resident eloped from the facility in a timely manner and submit the facility's investigation within 5 days for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for elopement (Resident #123). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to F689 On 2/25/25 at 8:43 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) of Resident #123. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility that included diagnoses but were not limited to; unspecified dementia, low back pain, and chronic pain related to neoplasm (abnormal growth of tissue). A review of comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment a tool, with an assessment reference date of 7/21/23, reflected a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for 2 of 35 residents (Resident #72 and #110), reviewed for MDS accuracy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: A review of the latest version of the MDS 3.0 Manual (updated October 2024), Chapter 3-page K-4, under steps for assessment revealed: This item compares the resident's weight in the current observation period with their weight at two snapshots in time: -At a point closest to 30-days preceding the current weight. -At a point closest to 180-days preceding the current weight. 1. On 3/3/25 at 9:17 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) of Resident #72. A review of the admission Record (AR; an admission summary) revealed that Resident #72 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to; Parkinson's disease, cerebral infarction (stroke), and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plans (CP) for 1 of 35 residents reviewed (Resident #63). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/24/25 at 10:59 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 63 was seated in a wheelchair (w/c) in front of their room, repeatedly stated, why, I am here, come here. The resident was able to self propel their w/c in short distance. The surveyor reviewed Resident #63's medical records and revealed: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #63 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses which included but not limited to; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, other forms of scoliosis (is a medical condition characterized by a sideways curvature of the spine), thoracolumbar region, other specified persistent mood disorders, unspecified psychosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility provided documentation, the facility failed to ensure that the recommendations of the Consultant were followed and reviewed by the Primary Care Physician for 1 of 6 residents, (Resident #32), reviewed for use of psychoactive medications according to the standard of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling, and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. On 2/24/25 at 11:06 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #32 seated in a wheelchair in front of the elevator with other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to; a.) ensure that the fall and pain evaluations were done as part of fall investigation, b.) care plan (CP) intervention was followed, and c.) CP intervention was in place for each fall and revised to reflect current condition of the resident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents, (Resident #107), reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ #176146 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to; a.) determine the cause, implement a new intervention, and start treatment to prevent further pressure injury/pressure ulcer (PI/PU) for a facility acquired PI/PU for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PU, (Resident #102), b.) follow the recommendations of the wound care consultant physician for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PU, (Resident #102), c.) follow a physician order for Braden Scale assessment for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for PU, (Resident #102 and #302), and d.) clarify multiple physician orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PU, (Resident #302). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/24/25 at 10:19 AM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) observed Resident #102 seated in a wheelchair and the resident's legs were wrapped with ace bandages. S#1 interviewed Resident #102 who stated that they did not think they had any wounds or PI/PU. On 2/25/25 at 10:25 AM, S#1 interviewed Resident #102's Certified Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards by adjusting medication times of administration to accommodate for dialysis scheduled times. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents, (Resident #22), reviewed for dialysis services and was evidenced by the following: On 2/24/25 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor observed the Resident #22 lying in bed, who stated, I have dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. I get picked up around 11:00 AM and I get back around 5:00 PM. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) revealed diagnoses which included but not limited to end stage renal disease (ESRD-kidneys have permanently lost their ability to function adequately) and dependence on renal dialysis (procedure which removes wastes and excess fluid from the blood). A review of the resident's medications (meds) order summary revealed: -Hemodialysis Tuesday - Thursday - Saturday, chair time: 11:55 AM. -Humalog Injection Solution 100 unit/ML (milliliters) inject as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of other facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure that the physician must review the resident's total program of care and date progress notes at each visit. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 residents, (Resident #63), reviewed for physician services. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/24/25 at 10:59 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #63 was seated in a wheelchair in front of their room, repeatedly stated, why, I am here, come here. The surveyor reviewed Resident #63's medical records and revealed: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #63 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses which included but not limited to; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, other forms of scoliosis (is a medical condition characterized by a sideways curvature of the spine), thoracolumbar region, other specified persistent mood disorders, unspecified psychosis not due to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT #NJ175735 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide or obtain routine medications in order to meet the needs of each resident for 3 of 35 residents reviewed (Residents #5, #32, and #352). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/26/25 at 7:57 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN#1) prepared and administered medications (meds) of Resident #5 (from the 2nd floor unit). LPN#1 informed the surveyor that there was no available Florastor (used as a probiotic, or friendly bacteria, to prevent the growth of harmful bacteria in the stomach and intestines) 250 mg (milligrams) in the medicine (med) cart. LPN#1 stated that she would check later in the back up machine for Florastor. LPN#1 did two residents for med pass observation. The surveyor did not observed LPN#1 went to get the Florastor or notified the physician of unavailable med. The surveyor reviewed the medical records for Resident #5. A review of the admission Record (AR, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring for the use of psychoactive medications (meds). This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for psychoactive meds used (Residents #32 and #63), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/24/25 at 11:06 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 32 seated in a wheelchair (w/c) in front of the elevator with other residents. The resident afterward was propelled by Recreation Aide #1 (RA#1), who informed the surveyor that the resident will be going down for lunch. The surveyor reviewed the medical records for Resident #32. A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that Resident #32 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but not limited to; Parkinson's disease (a chronic and progressive movement disorder that initially causes tremor in one hand, stiffness or slowing of movement)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications securely and appropriately according to facility's policy and standard of clinical practice. The deficient practice was identified in 1 of 4 medication carts inspected on 3 of 3 units. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling, and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. On 3/3/25 at 12:04 PM, the surveyor entered the 1st floor nursing unit. The surveyor observed a medication storage cart (medcart) that was unlocked as evidenced by the locking button…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete, available, accurate, and readily accessible medical records. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of the 35 residents reviewed (Residents #107). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the 2nd-floor unit on 2/24/2025 at 10:49 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #107 lying on bed. On that same date and time, the resident informed the surveyor that they had weakness to the left side of their body due to stroke and claimed difficulty with walking. The resident further stated that they had incidents of falls in the facility, and unsure when and where in the facility the fall incidents happened. The resident's bed was not in a low position. The surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #107 and revealed: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to other sequelae of cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) practices for 1 of 3 staff (Licensed Practical Nurse) and follow appropriate infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, standards of clinical practice, and the facility's policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers dated 02/27/24 revealed: Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: Immediately before touching a patient . Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient . After touching a patient or the patient's immediate environment After contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces Immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0944 — isolated
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure facility staff had mandatory training that outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement) program for 1 of five 5 Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) reviewed for mandatory education. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/3/25 at 9:13 AM, the surveyor reviewed the annual in-service education hours for five randomly selected CNA files, which were provided by the facility. The Staff In-service Logs showed the following: CNA #1 had a date of hire (doh) of 1/25/18. According to the Transcript, CNA #1 did not have QAPI training. CNA #2 had a doh of 11/20/07. According to the Transcript, CNA #2 did not have QAPI training. On 3/3/25 at 12:16 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Facility Educator (FE) regarding CNA education and mandatory topics. The FE stated that she tracked their education based on their anniversary date. She added that if a mandatory topic was done…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00162219 Based on record review staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported to appropriate entities in a timely manner for one of eleven residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for abuse of 21 sample residents. R1 experienced an injury to her finger and the incident was not reported to the local Ombudsman, the family, or the State Agency. Findings include: Review of R1's admission Record, dated 01/26/24 and found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Admissions tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/05/22 and found in the EMR under the MDS tab, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15 which indicated R1 had severe cognitive impairment. The assessment indicated the resident exhibited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C#: NJ00169205, NJ00162219 Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted related to injuries of unknown origin for two of eleven residents (Residents (R) 1 and R4) reviewed for abuse of 21 sample residents. R1 experienced an injury to her finger and R4 had a broken clavicle; these incidents were not investigated by the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of R1's admission Record, dated 01/26/24 and found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Admissions tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/05/22 and found in the EMR under the MDS tab, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15 which indicated R1 had severe cognitive impairment. The assessment indicated the resident exhibited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) follow a physician's order with regards to the use of an assistive device for one of three residents, Resident #5 reviewed for the limited range of motion (ROM); b) utilized the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk (a standardized, evidence-based assessment tool commonly used in health care to assess and document a patient's risk for developing pressure ) for two of four residents, Residents #15 and #83 reviewed for pressure ulcers; c) follow a physician's recommendation and discontinuing a wound treatment for a healed wound in a timely manner for one of four residents (Resident#136) reviewed for wounds. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-18 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) received performance review for four of five CNA files reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/12/23 at 12:50 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) the education, competencies and performance reviews for five CNA's. On 01/13/23, the facility provided the education and competencies for four of the five CNA's. The facility indicated that one of the five CNAs had resigned. The facility did not provide performance reviews for the five CNAs. On 01/17/23 at 01:45 PM, the surveyor, in the presence of the survey team and the Director of Nursing (DON), asked the LNHA to provide the performance reviews for the four CNAs. The facility did not provide performance reviews for the five CNAs. On 01/18/23 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the survey team, asked the DON and LNHA for the performance reviews for the five CNAs. The DON stated that she would have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure a) expired narcotic medications were removed from active inventory b) dispensed and received medication from the pharmacy were reconciled for accuracy which resulted in the wrong dosage stocked in the active inventory c) expired biological from 6/22 were removed from active inventory This deficient practice was identified for one of one of the electronic emergency (backup) machine [name redacted] observed and was evidenced as follows: 1. On 01/17/23 at 9:59 AM, the surveyor received the [name redacted] Inventory report from the Director of Nursing (DON). On 01/17/23 at 10:14 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) stated that as a supervisor, she was responsible for the reconciliation of the narcotic medications stored in the backup machine (cycle counts) with another supervisor. The Supervisors alternate days as assigned. The UM/RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-18 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the interview and review of the facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the care planning (care conference meeting) was scheduled and that the resident's representative (RR) was provided sufficient notice in advance of the meeting according to the facility practice and policy for one of three quarters care conference reviewed for Resident#83. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/11/23 at 8:58 AM, the RR informed the survey team that he/she visits Resident #83 almost every day. The RR had a concern that care planning meetings stopped since August 2022 and no invitation was provided to the RR. On 01/11/23 at 11:04 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #83 seated in a wheelchair, clean and well-dressed. The surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #83. The resident's admission Record (or face sheet; admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Unspecified Dementia with other behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, peripheral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, the facility failed to ensure that the method for filing a grievance was consistent with the facility's practice and policy. This deficient practice was identified for three of four grievance incidents of Resident #83. The evidence was as follows: On 01/05/23 at 10:42 AM, during the Entrance Conference of the surveyor with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON), the LNHA stated that he started working at the facility three months ago. The DON stated that she started working on 12/15/22, the same time when both the previous DON and Infection Preventionist Nurse left the facility. On 01/11/23 at 8:58 AM, the resident representative (RR) informed the survey team that he/she visits Resident #83 almost every day. The RR stated that he/she complained to the previous administrator about the resident's arms discoloration and was told that it was taken care of and that the resident had fragile skin. The RR further stated that he/she had an issue with the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan to address the actual skin impairments for one of four residents (Resident #15) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/05/23 at 10:42 AM, during the Entrance Conference of the surveyor with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated that she started working on 12/15/22, the same time when both the previous DON and Infection Preventionist Nurse (IPN) left the facility. The DON further stated that the IPN was also the Wound Nurse (WN). On 01/05/23 at 12:20 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) who informed the surveyor that she was not sure if Resident #15 had facility-acquired wounds. On 01/05/23 at 12:28 PM, the surveyor observed the resident seated with left foot dressing. The surveyor reviewed Resident #15's medical record. The admission Record (or face sheet; an admission summary)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a) initiate a baseline care plan which included at risk for falls within 48 hours of admission and thoroughly and completely investigate a fall to include the addition of interventions to prevent a fall for one of four residents reviewed for falls, Resident #321; and b) failed to follow and maintain fall prevention interventions as written on the resident's plan of care for one of four residents reviewed for falls, Resident #132. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 01/05/23 at 12:05 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #321 in a reclined chair in the day room of the third floor unit. The resident's right side of the upper face was bruised. On 01/09/23 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #321's electronic medical record. The admission Record (AR; or face sheet; an admission summary) indicated that the resident had diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Registered Nurse (RN) had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/05/23 at 12:20 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) who informed the surveyor that she was not sure if Resident #15 had facility-acquired wounds. On 01/05/23 at 12:28 PM, the surveyor observed the resident seated with left foot dressing. The surveyor reviewed Resident #15's medical records. The admission Record (AR; or face sheet which included the admission summary) showed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Diabetes mellitus (a disorder in which the body does not produce enough or respond normally to insulin), chronic kidney disease (a gradual loss of kidney function over time), and peripheral vascular disease (a blood circulation disorder that causes the blood vessels outside heart and brain to narrow,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner as evidenced by the following: On 01/06/23 at 11:31 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen on the second day with Food Service Director (FSD). The surveyor observed the food prep area with open food and kitchen staff preparing the lunch meal trays. Above the prep area were two kitchen tiles in between two air vents with an accumulation of black debris. At that time, the FSD stated that the black debris was an accumulation of dust. The surveyor asked the FSD regarding the cleaning schedule of air vents and above kitchen tiles. The FSD informed the surveyor that the air vents and above tiles should be cleaned once a month by the night shift kitchen staff and that there was a log for cleaning. In addition, the surveyor asked the FSD to show the cleaning log and when was the last time it was cleaned. On that same date and time, the FSD was not able to provide documentation and log that the air vents and tiles were cleaned. The FSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) perform hand hygiene appropriately for two of eight staff and, b) properly dispose of PPE (personal protective equipment) for one of two staff observed in TBP (transmission based precautions) room in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for infection control to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the U.S. CDC guidelines Hand Hygiene Recommendations, Guidance for Healthcare Providers (HCP) for Hand Hygiene and COVID-19, page last reviewed 1/8/2021 included that the HCP should perform hand hygiene before and after direct contact with the residents and immediately after glove removal. In addition, when cleaning your hands with soap and water, wet your hands first with water, apply the amount of product recommended by the manufacturer to your hands, and rub your hands together vigorously for at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to complete a wound treatment in accordance with the physician's order. This was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Residents #135) reviewed for wounnd treatments. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statues, Annotated Title 45, Chapter. Nursing Board The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and well being, and executing a medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-01-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of Oxygen and failed to maintain safe cleaning and storage of BiPAP (a Bi-level positive pressure airway ventilation machine to improve oxygenation) equipment according to professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was observed for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #21 and #177) reviewed for oxygen use and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/19/21 at 11 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #21 in bed awake and alert to person, place and date. The resident was receiving Oxygen 2 liters per minute (LPM) via a nasal cannula. The surveyor observed the tubing was dated 1/18/21. During the interview, the surveyor observed a BiPAP machine on top of the resident's dresser. The surveyor asked the resident about the use of the BiPAP machine. The resident stated that the 3-11 shift nurse places the face mask and connects the tubing to the machine each night to help her breathe easy as he/she sleeps and the 11-7 shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,334 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,334 — penalty dated 2025-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 36 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Care One At MillburyMillbury, MA 1 of 5Care One At RandolphRandolph, MA 1 of 5Careone At OradellOradell, NJ 2 of 5Care One At BrooklineBrookline, MA 2 of 5Care One At NewtonNewton, MA 2 of 5Care One At RedstoneEast Longmeadow, MA 2 of 5Care One At WeymouthWeymouth, MA 2 of 5CareOne At Hanover TownshipWhippany, NJ 2 of 5Careone At MiddletownAtlantic Highlands, NJ 2 of 5Rehab & Nursing Ctr Greater PittsburghGreensburg, PA 3 of 5Care One At LexingtonLexington, MA 3 of 5Care One At LowellLowell, MA 3 of 5Care One At New BedfordNew Bedford, MA 3 of 5CareOne At Madison AvenueMorristown, NJ 3 of 5CareOne At MoorestownMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5Careone At East BrunswickEast Brunswick, NJ 3 of 5Careone At Ridgewood AvenueParamus, NJ 3 of 5Careone At WellingtonHackensack, NJ 4 of 5Care One At ConcordW Concord, MA 4 of 5Care One At Essex ParkBeverly, MA 4 of 5Care One At NorthamptonNorthampton, MA 4 of 5CareOne At TeaneckTeaneck, NJ 4 of 5CareOne at The HighlandsEdison, NJ 4 of 5Careone At CresskillCresskill, NJ 4 of 5Careone At EveshamMarlton, NJ 4 of 5Careone At LivingstonLivingston, NJ 4 of 5Careone At ParsippanyParsippany Troy Hill, NJ 4 of 5Careone At Somerset ValleyBound Brook, NJ 5 of 5Care One At HolyokeHolyoke, MA 5 of 5Care One At PeabodyPeabody, MA 5 of 5Care One At WilmingtonWilmington, MA 5 of 5CareOne At WallWall, NJ 5 of 5Careone At HolmdelHolmdel, NJ 5 of 5Careone At ValleyWestwood, NJ 5 of 5Careone At WayneWayne, NJ 5 of 5River Glen Health Care CenterSouthbury, CT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THCI OF NEW JERSRY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/25/2008
STRAUS, DANIELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/10/2003
CARE REALTY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/10/2003
DES-I 2016 GRATOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2021
BARUCH, DAVIDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021
HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2003

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.4M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 12%Other / private 12%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$360per resident / day
operating cost
$10,955per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$365per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315306. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next