Careone At Evesham

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 516 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 177 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 106.0 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  COMPLAINT #2083729, 2805511 Based on interviews, review of medical records and pertinent facility documentation on 5/1/26, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a fall after the resident reported to staff that their injury, which the facility labeled as injury of unknown origin was sustained from a fall. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for falls and was evidenced by the following:Resident #2 was no longer at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: discitis (an infection of the intervertebral disc space) of the lumbar region, cirrhosis of liver, and difficulty walking. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 3/14/26 indicated that Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 indicating that the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 31 residents reviewed. (Resident #63). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A review of Resident # 63's admission Recorded revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with the following but not limited to diagnosis, unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction. (stroke)A review of Resident # 63's Electronical Medical Record (EMR) revealed physician's orders for escitalopram oxalate oral tablet 20 milligrams (MG) (a medication used to treat depression and anxiety). The EMR also revealed a physician's order for valproic acid 250mg/5 milliliters (a medication that can be prescribed to manage mood disorders) was to be given three times a day for mood.A review of Resident #63's Care Plan (CP) revealed a focus stating At risk for changes in mood related to diagnosis of depression with an initiated date of 07/07/2025.A review of Resident # 63's admission Minimal Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nutritional formula connected to a feeding tube (surgically placed tube into the stomach to provide nutritional formula) was accurately labeled for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) reviewed for tube feeding. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 08:25 AM, the surveyor observed a bottle of nutritional formula hanging from a pole that was connected to a feeding pump attached to Resident #7's feeding tube while he/she was in bed. The feeding pump was operating. At that time, the surveyor observed that the bottle was not labeled with the residents, name, start time or the amount that was to be infused. A review of Resident #7's admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated [DATE], revealed that he/she had a feeding tube while a resident in the facility. A review of Resident #7's physician orders located in the electronic medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NJ Complaint: #360874 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the prescriber's orders and acceptable professional standards and principles by administering medications past the required time frame. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for being free of significant med errors. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident #121's admission record reflected that this resident had diagnosis which included but not limited to: surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin and heart failure (a weakened heart muscle). A review of Resident #121's physician's orders revealed the following orders but not limited to: 2/14/25 Aspirin tablet chewable 81 MG (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for coronary artery disease, Plavix tablet 75 MG give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for coronary artery disease, gabapentin 300mg give 1 capsule by mouth three times a day for neuropathy. A review of Resident #121's Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an orderly physical environment for 2 of 2 facility units (100 & 200) reviewed under the Environmental Task. The deficient practice is evidenced by the following: On 04/11/2024 at 10:20 AM during a tour of the 100 Unit communal shower room, the surveyor observed a shelf on the wall adjacent to the shower stall. On the shelf was an unpackaged incontinence brief, a hairbrush with hair entangled in the bristles, and various hygienic bottled toiletries. The room also emanated a foul odor. On the same date at 10:27 AM during a tour of the 100 Unit common area across from the nurses station, the surveyor observed a table that had food debris and two partially consumed beverages left on top. On the floor under the table was a single, blue slipper. The surveyor observed Residents participating in an activities exercise in the same common area at the time of the observation. On the same…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NJ Complaint # NJ00169132, NJ00171624 Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) obtain a physician's order for residents to be discharged from the facility prior to discharge, b). change a central line catheter dressing as ordered by the physician (Resident #84), c.) follow physician orders to offload a residents heels while in bed (Resident #467), d.) follow physician order to check for helmet placement every two hours (Resident #468), and e.) maintain medication records that were complete with staff signatures according to professional standards of clinical practice for Resident #35, 1 of 29 residents reviewed for professional standards. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #88, #34 and #46) on 2 of 2 nursing units (100 and 200 units) and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level 1 assessment after a resident was newly diagnosed with a mental illness. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRRs (Resident #54) and was evidenced by the following: On 04/15/2024 the surveyor reviewed Resident #54's electronic medical record (EMR) which included review of the PASRR level 1 completed on 06/21/2019, which was negative and marked no for any diagnosis of mental illness. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 07/15/2019, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7/15, indicating severe cognitive impairment and review of section I did not include any psychiatric diagnoses. A review of the annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder, and schizophrenia noted in Section I. A review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident with pain. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #27, 1 of 24 residents reviewed for care plans and was evidenced by the following: On 04/10/24 at 10:06 AM, during the initial tour of the facility Resident #27 told the surveyor he/she had right hip pain and left foot pain. The surveyor asked if he/she received pain medication and the resident replied, Oh they are so busy. The surveyor asked the resident to rate the pain on a zero to 10 scale and the resident said it was a seven, meaning moderate pain level. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #27 had medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to sciatica (pain affecting back, hip, and outer side of leg), fibromyalgia (long term condition that involves body pain and tiredness), depression, anxiety, and low back pain. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 03/31/24, indicated the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safety device used to prevent residents from elopement was in place for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #35). This deficient practice was evidenced by: According to the admission record Resident #35 was admitted with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, paranoid schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. The surveyor reviewed the 1/20/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, and observed that the facility had identified Resident #35 as not being cognitively intact. The MDS reflected that Resident #35 had no wandering behavior during the lookback period and he/she used an elopement alarm daily. During initial tour on 04/10/24 at 10:45 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 35 in the activity area painting. According to the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) Resident #35 utilized an elopement alarm. On 04/11/24 at 10:27 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #35 in the room ambulating. The resident did not have an elopement alarm to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient services based upon current standards of practice and the resident's comprehensive care plan to document urinary output in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 72) investigated for Urinary Catheter or UTI. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 72's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 03/16/2024 under section, H revealed that he/she had an indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra to allow urine to drain from the bladder for collection). A review of Resident # 72's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed under the section, Diagnoses that he/she was diagnosed with Paraplegia (paralysis typically of the lower body) and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder (lack of lack bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord or nerve problem). A review of Resident #…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ