CareOne At Madison Avenue

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 377 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 124 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 178 beds and averages 109.5 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) failed to ensure that the dish machine logs were completed and failed to ensure the dish machine was properly functioning and, b.) failed to maintain the kitchen environment and equipment in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination from foreign substances and potential for the development a food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/3/25 at 11:14 AM, in the presence of the Food Services Director (FSD) and the Culinary Director (CD), the surveyor observed the following: 1. The surveyor observed the low temperature dish machine and the FSD used a test strip to measure the Parts Per Million (PPM) for the sanitizer portion of the machine. The FSD attempted to use the test strip and he was unable to use the test strip correctly, then the CD instructed the FSD with how to measure the PPM for the dish machine. The FSD stated that he should have known how to perform this test on the machine and he was covering today for his food service…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow Center for Disease Control recommendations and guidelines for Hand Hygiene for 2 of 2 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), b.) failed to dispose of waste appropriately in 1 of 3 residents rooms reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) (Resident # 95) and, c.) failed to have signage for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for TBP (Resident # 95). Reference: According to the U.S. CDC guidelines for Transmission-Based Precautions dated 4/13/24, included the following recommendation details: -Contact Precaution; Use personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately, including gloves and gown. Wear a gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the patient or the patient's environment. Donning PPE upon room entry and properly discarding before exiting the patient room is done to contain pathogens. -Droplet Precaution; Use personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately. [NAME] mask upon entry into the patient room or patient space.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ 00174418 Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to respond to residents' requests for assistance in a timely manner for 5 of 5 residents in attendance at the resident group meeting (Resident #8, 37, 51,60, 97) and 1 of 20 Residents (Resident #254) observed during a tour of the first floor Nursing Unit. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor conducted the resident group meeting on 4/7/25 at 10:30 AM. All 5 of 5 residents stated that the call bell response was slow on all shifts. The residents stated they wait between 30 minutes to an hour. The surveyor interviewed resident # 254 on 4/7/25 at 12:50 PM. The resident stated that on 4/6/25, they waited from 9:00 PM to 10:30 PM for their call bell to be answered. The resident stated that they were incontinent and were dependent on staff for personal care. A review of minutes from past resident council meetings included a 2/10/25 comment from residents stating that they would like to see faster call bell responses. On 4/7/35 at 2:45 PM, the surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #NJ 00174418 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility-provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that incontinence care was provided to dependent residents in a timely manner for a.) 1 of 20 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care (Resident #254) and b.) 4 of 4 residents (Resident #17, 90, 255 and 256) observed for incontinence care on 1 of 3 Units (1st-floor Nursing Unit). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/7/25 at 12:50 PM, during a tour of the 1st floor Nursing Unit, Resident #254 stated that on 4/6/25 at 9:00 PM, the resident was incontinent of his/her bowels and used the call bell to summon staff for assistance. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) did not respond until 10:30 PM. The Resident was in a soiled brief for 1.5 hours. A review of Resident #254's admission Record reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The surveyor interviewed Resident #13 on 4/3/25 at 11:07 AM and on 4/7/25 at 10:25 AM in their room. The resident discussed their long term pain management for 3 herniated discs. The resident stated there was a time in October 2024 when a newly prescribed physician's order of oxycodone was not administered to the resident for 2 days. A review of the resident's medical record revealed the following information. The resident's admission Record included diagnoses of cervical disc degeneration, polyneuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pain, and Parkinson's disease. The 2/19/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool indicated the resident had no cognitive deficits, utilized a manual wheelchair, experienced pain in the previous 5 days occasionally limiting day to day activities. The worst pain the resident experienced on a 0-10 scale (no pain to worst pain) in the previous pain was 3. The resident was coded to have taken opioid medicatons during the previous 7 days. The care plan for pain,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a physician's order for peritoneal site care and the assessment for sign and symptoms of infection for precaution. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the closed record for Resident #26. 1. A review of the Resident admission Record (admission summary) reflected that Resident #26 was admitted , with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, and peritonitis. A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 2/27/25 reflected the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact and on admission, the resident was received PD. A review of the electronic Treatment Administration Record (eTAR) included a physician's order for Peritoneal Catheter (PC) site care every shift. Assess for signs and symptoms of infection every shift for precaution…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure a.) disposition (destruction), reconciliation, and accountability of the returned controlled dangerous substance (narcotic; medications, with high potential for abuse, were tracked with detail) for 1 of 1 automatic dispensing system (ADS), b.) opened saline solution bottle was dated, to indicate expiration, which was identified during an observation of a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), and c.) a medication was stored in accordance with manufacturer's specifications identified in 1 of 4 medication carts inspected. On [DATE] at 11:24 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing stated that she had access to the website to review different types of reports. The DON stated she compared the reports and destroyed the returned narcotic medication with another nurse.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. On 4/7/25 at 12:20 PM, on the lower level (LL), the surveyor observed that in the bathroom of 2 unsampled residents in rooms #17, and #21, the emergency calling device's pull cords were wrapped around the grab bars. At 12:38 PM, the surveyor showed the concerns to the Registered Nurse (RN). The RN stated that the pull cords should not be wrapped around the grab bars and the paper product should not be placed inside the call device. The RN stated that the resident's on the LL mostly require assistance with toileting and showering and would not be in the bathroom without a staff member. 3. On 04/07/25 at 12:45 PM, on the first floor, the surveyor observed that in the bathroom of an unsampled resident's room, (room116), the emergency calling device cord above the toilet was missing. At 3:15 PM, the surveyor showed the CNA the concern. The CNA stated that the cord should be there. At 3:20 PM, the surveyor showed the concern to the Registered Nurse/ Unit Manager (RN/UM). The RN/UM confirmed that the cord should be there so that the residents could use it to summon help. NJAC 8:39-31.8…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the dignity of an unsampled resident on the 3rd floor. This deficient practice was found with 1 of 2 Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) observed on the 3rd floor during the survey. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/8/25 at 12:14 PM, the surveyor observed an unsampled resident who self-propelled in their wheelchair down the hallway, the surveyor then overheard the CNA say to the unsampled resident, you can't be moving around in the hallway because people are eating in their room, and then the CNA went behind the resident's wheelchair and push their wheelchair down the hallway toward the unsampled resident's room. At 1:00 PM, the surveyor interviewed the CNA, who stated that he was not regularly on the unit and was concerned that the resident might try to enter other resident's rooms while they ate their lunch. At 1:35 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), who stated that the unsampled resident was allowed to self propel around the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's executed living will and durable power of attorney for health care was maintained in the same section of the resident's medical record readily retrievable by any facility staff, follow up on a New Jersey Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form, and determine the code status. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #52), and was evidenced by the following: On 4/3/25 at 10:18 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #52 asleep wearing a short sleeve shirt, the right upper arm had a small bandage near the arteriovenous (AV) fistula (surgically created connection between the artery and the vein primarily used for hemodialysis). On 4/4/25 at 9:10 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #52 laying on their side, asleep. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #52. A review of the Resident admission Record (admission summary) reflected that Resident #52 was admitted , with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $942K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ