No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Care One At Redstone

135 Benton Drive, East Longmeadow, MA 01028 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 254 certified beds · (413) 695-7866 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (413) 695-7866 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited Aug 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$16,720 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,720 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-22)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
265 Benton Dr · (413) 224-2727 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
55 Deer Park Dr · (413) 525-5700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
696 Bliss Rd · (413) 372-8486 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1161 Williams St · (413) 565-4160 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1280 Williams St · (413) 567-3210

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.3%16.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.1%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.8%15.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.5%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.4%15.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.8%19.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.0%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.3%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.5%21.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.4%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.2%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%11.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.791.881.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.911.501.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 436 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
17.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.50U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 188 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.0%CMS range 45.6–56.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF17.1%CMS range 14.3–19.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.2%CMS range 6.9–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
1.28
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
46.8%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 254 beds and averages 186.8 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 67 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-20)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-10-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews, and observations for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1) who had a known food allergy to onions, the Facility failed to ensure his/her diet was free from allergens, when on 09/15/25, Resident #1 was served a meal that contained onions, Resident #1 consumed some of the meal, developed signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction, and was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation of anaphylaxis (a severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction) where he/she was admitted for further treatment.Findings include:Review of the Facility's Policy titled Food Allergies and Intolerances, dated as revised August 2017, indicated the following:- Food allergies are immune system responses to allergens (foods).- Residents are assessed for a history of food allergies and intolerances upon admission and as part of the comprehensive assessment.- Severe food allergies are noted on the face of the chart (in the form of a sticker or permanent marking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2023-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, policy review, and record review, the facility and its staff failed to ensure quality care and services were provided to one Resident (#161) out of a total sample of 37 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: A) monitor and notify the Physician of critical lab values consistent with hypernatremia and acute kidney injury resulting in a hospitalization, and B) identify, address and monitor an unplanned, significant weight loss by failing to re-check weights timely, monitor enteral (a liquid form of nutrition delivered into the digestive system) intake consistently, and implement nutritional interventions to prevent further significant weight loss. Findings include: Resident #161 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including: Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia with gastrostomy tube placement (g-tube: a surgically placed device used to give direct access to a resident's stomach for supplemental feeding, hydration or medicine). Review of the most recent Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-02-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff prevented one Resident (#58), of 10 applicable residents, from developing two pressure injuries/ulcers (injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin), out of a total sample of 37 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: a) accurately assess the Resident's risk for developing pressure injuries while at the facility for post-operative care after spinal surgery, and b) also accurately assess, document and treat the Resident's pressure injuries. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol, revised April 2018, indicated the following: - The nursing staff and practitioner will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure ulcers. - The nurse shall describe and document/report the following: >full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-02-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff identified, addressed and monitored significant weight loss of one resident (#82) with unplanned, significant weight loss, out of a sample of 37 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify a Physician or Nurse Practitioner of Resident #82's change in condition, recheck weights timely, weigh resident at the frequency ordered by the Physician and implement nutritional interventions to prevent further significant weight loss. Findings include: Resident #82 was admitted to the facility in September 2018, with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Insulin Dependent Diabetes, and Dysphagia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/31/22, indicated: -Resident #82 was rarely/never understood -non-ambulatory -dependent with eating -was 60 inches tall (5 feet) and weighed 76 pounds The MDS further indicated that Resident #82 had a significant weight loss and was not on a Physician prescribed weight loss regime. Further review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1) who required laboratory work for a urine culture and sensitivity test (test used to identify bacterial infection and determine the most effective antibiotic), the Facility failed to ensure nursing promptly notified the Physician, Physician Assistant, or Nurse Practitioner of the abnormal laboratory result, when Resident #1's laboratory results were sent to the facility on [DATE], but the provider was not made aware until 01/28/26, five days later resulting in a delay in treatment.Findings include:Review of the Facility policy titled Lab and Diagnostic Test Results- Clinical Protocol, date revised November 2018, indicated the laboratory, diagnostic radiology provider, or other testing source will report test results to the facility. The Policy indicated a Facility nurse will contact the Physician to report abnormal test results and document information about when, how and to whom the information was provided and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#157), out of total sample of 33 residents, was free from the use of physical restraints. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #157's Velcro self-releasing seatbelt was released during supervised activities and failed to evaluate Resident #157's ability to self-release the Velcro seatbelt every shift, restricting his/her ability to move freely when the Resident had a history of attempting to stand up from a seated position. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Use of Restraints, revised April 2017, indicated the following: -Restraints should only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried successfully. -Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom(s) and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls. -When the use of restraints is indicated, the least restrictive alternative will be used for the least amount of time necessary, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#175 and #4) out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, for Resident #175 and Resident #4, the facility failed to reorder the Residents' medications resulting in the facility staff borrowing other Residents' medications to administer the prescribed dosages. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Ordering and Receiving from Pharmacy, revised January 2018, indicated: -Medications and related products are received from the dispensing pharmacy on a timely basis. The facility maintains accurate records of medication order and receipt. - If not automatically refilled by the pharmacy, repeat medications (refills) are written on a medication order form, by placing a re-order portion of the prescription label in the appropriate area on the order form provided by the pharmacy for that purpose. - The nurse who re-orders the medication is responsible for notifying the pharmacy of changes in directions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#14) received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health, out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #14 received timely foot care and treatment in order to prevent potential and actual complications when Resident #14 was identified as being high risk due to a diagnosis of Diabetes, having elongated toenails that were affecting his/her balance and mobility, experiencing discomfort during physical therapy treatments, and received toenail care on 8/15/25, 73 days after the initial identification of need on 6/3/25.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Nursing Care of the Older Adult with Diabetes, revised November 2020, indicated the following:-Complications associated with Diabetes can be attributed to: (1) uncontrolled hyperglycemia and subsequent damage to vasculature; over treatment of diabetes resulting in hypoglycemia; or (3) common co-morbidities of diabetes.-Hyperglycemia and vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services related to an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine outside the body) for three Residents (#1, #2 and #3), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Residents #1 and #3, to ensure staff followed the Physician's orders relative to the Foley (type of indwelling urinary catheter) catheter size, increasing the Resident's risk for indwelling urinary catheter complications; and 2. For Resident #2, to ensure the Resident's Foley catheter was secured with a securement device to reduce friction and movement at the insertion site. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary, dated 2001, indicated: -Purpose is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications including urinary tract infections. - Review the resident’s care plan to assess any special needs of the resident. - Ensure the catheter remains secured with a securement device to reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#95), out of a total sample of 33 residents, had the ability to make choices about their daily preferences. Specifically, for Resident #95, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's preference to receive a peanut butter and jelly sandwich for dinner was honored. Findings include:Review of the Resident's Right Policy and Procedure, dated February 2021, indicated that federal and state law guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: -self-determination. -be informed of, and participate in, his or her care planning and treatment. Resident #95 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses that included Glaucoma and Gastric Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/3/25, indicated Resident #95: -was moderately cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15. -was able to make him/herself understood -was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to prevent the potential spread of infection on two Units ([NAME] and [NAME]), out of five Units observed. Specifically, on the [NAME] Unit, the facility failed to ensure:1. Staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing incontinence care to a resident who was on contact precautions; [NAME] the [NAME] Unit, the facility failed to ensure:2. Contaminated gloves were disposed of properly and appropriate hand hygiene was performed after removal of contaminated gloves, increasing the potential spread of healthcare-associated infections.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Isolation- Categories of Transmission Based Precautions, last revised September 2022, indicated the following: -Transmission-based precautions are initiated when a resident develops signs and symptoms of a transmissible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a diagnosis of Epilepsy (seizures) and had a Physician's Orders for anti-convulsant medications (used to treat seizures), the Facility failed to ensure nursing notified the Provider when he/she did not receive the anti-convulsant medication as ordered. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised February 2021 indicated: -The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a (an): -need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly. -refusal of treatment or medication two (2) or more consecutive times. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in February 2025, diagnoses included but was not limited to Epilepsy. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders for the Month of April 2025, indicated it included orders for, but not limited to the following: A) 8:00 A.M.-Oxcarbazepine (anti-convulsant medication used to treat epilepsy) oral tablet, 300 milligrams (mg) give one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #1) who had a diagnosis of Epilepsy (seizures) and had a Physician's Orders for anti-convulsant (used to treat seizures) medications, the Facility failed to ensure they obtained, and Resident #1 was provided the medication as ordered by his/her Provider. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled, Pharmacy Services Overview, revised April 2019, indicated but was not limited to: -Residents have a sufficient supply of their prescribed medications and receive medications (routine, emergency or as needed) in a timely manner. -Nursing staff communicate prescriber orders to the pharmacy and are responsible for contacting the pharmacy if a resident's medication is not available for administration. -Medications are received, labeled, stored, administered and disposed of according to all applicable state and federal laws and consistent with standards of practice. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in February 2025, diagnoses included but were not limited to Epilepsy. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a diagnosis of Epilepsy (seizures) and had a Physician's Orders for anti-convulsant (used to treat seizures) medications, the Facility failed to ensure the resident was free from significant medication errors when he/she was not administered the medication as prescribed, placing him/her at risk for seizures. Findings include: Review of the Facility policy titled, Administering Medication, revised 2019, indicated the following: -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. -Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed times, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in February 2025, diagnoses included but were not limited to Epilepsy. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders for the Month of April 2025, indicated it included orders for, but not limited to the following: A) 8:00 A.M.-Oxcarbazepine (anti-convulsant) oral tablet, 300…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), who had a history of Hypokalemia (low potassium levels in the blood) and had a Physician's Order for potassium supplements, the Facility failed to ensure nursing notified the Provider when he/she did not receive the supplement as ordered. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised February 2021 indicated: - The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): - need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly. - refusal of treatment or medication two (2) or more consecutive times. Review of Resident #3's Hospital Discharge/Transfer Note, dated 03/12/25, indicated his/her medication orders included (but was not limited to) the following: - Potassium Phosphate-Sodium Phosphate 250 milligrams (mg) -280 mg-160 mg oral powder, administer by mouth two times per day for 14 days. Further review of Resident #3's Hospital Discharge/Transfer note indicated lab work was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), who had a history of Hypokalemia (low potassium levels in the blood) and a Physician's order for Potassium Sodium Sulfate (a supplement that can help maintain a therapeutic potassium level in the body), the facility failed to ensure they obtained and Resident #3 was provided the medication, as ordered by his/her Provider. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled, Pharmacy Services Overview, revised April 2019, indicated but was not limited to: - Residents have a sufficient supply of their prescribed medications and receive medications (routine, emergency or as needed) in a timely manner. - Nursing staff communicate Prescriber orders to the pharmacy and are responsible for contacting the pharmacy if a resident's medication is not available for administration. Resident #3 was admitted to the Facility in March 2025, diagnoses included Hypokalemia, Metabolic Encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood), Influenza, and Respiratory Syncytial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to properly follow sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the risk of foodborne illness in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure resident food was prepared and distributed to prevent potential for cross contamination. 2. Ensure beard nets were worn in the food preparation area. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Preventing Foodborne Illness- Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, revised December 2008, indicated Food Service employees shall follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. The policy also included the following: -Employees must wash their hands: >after handling soiled equipment or utensils >during food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks >after engaging in other activities that contaminate the hands -Gloves are considered single-use items and must be discarded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to notify the Physician of a need to alter treatment for two Residents (#130 and #73), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically: 1) For Resident #130, the facility failed to notify the Physician/ Provider timely for an emergency order and/or alternative pain medication when the ordered pain medication was unavailable from the pharmacy to address the Resident's pain. 2) For Resident #73, the facility failed to notify the Provider when the ordered pain medication regimen was determined to be ineffective in managing the Resident's pain. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Pain Assessment and Management, with an edit date of 11/10/22, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Pain management is a multidisciplinary care process that includes the following: >monitoring for the effectiveness of interventions >and modifying approaches as necessary. -The medication regime is implemented as ordered. -Results of the interventions are documented and communicated directly to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#66 and #71), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #66, the facility failed to: a)complete PICC device dressing changes as ordered by the Physician, b)complete external catheter length measurements as ordered, c)notify the Provider timely when changes in external catheter length and arm circumference measurements were identified for a Resident with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC: a thin, soft tube that is inserted into a vein in the arm, for long-term antibiotics, nutrition, medications, and blood draws. The PICC is a type of CVAD [Central Vascular Access Device] catheter) placing Resident #66 at risk for undiagnosed infiltration (when fluid or medication given by an intravenous [IV] device exits the vein and enters the soft tissues) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT: a blood clot in a deep vein). 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide pain management consistent with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#130 and #72), of two applicable Residents reviewed for pain, out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically: 1) For Resident #130, the facility failed to provide pain medication as ordered for severe pain reported by the Resident. The facility also failed to contact the Physician/ Provider for an emergency order and/or alternative pain medication to aid in managing the Resident's pain when the ordered pain medication was unavailable from the pharmacy to be administered. 2) For Resident #73, the facility failed to appropriately monitor the Resident for effectiveness of prescribed pain medication, and notify the Physician/ Provider for evaluation and modification of the pain medication regimen as needed. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Pain Assessment and Management, with an edit date of 11/10/22, indicated but was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#24) out of a total sample of 29 residents, was afforded the ability to review/sign documents pertaining to his/her medical care. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #24, who was identified as his/her own person and was able to make his/her own decisions, was able to review and sign documentation relative to Advanced Directives (life sustaining measures that can be taken when a person's heart stops or they fail to breathe on their own) and ancillary services that could be provided while at the facility. Findings include: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with a diagnosis including Cerebral Infarction (Stroke: occurs when the blood flow to the brain is disrupted causing tissue damage) without residual effects. Review of the Resident's clinical record included the following: -Request for Services Form for consent or declination for audiology (hearing services), eye care, podiatry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- screen to determine if a resident had an intellectual or developmental disability (ID or DD) and/or serious mental illness (SMI) and needed further evaluation) for one Resident (#112), out of a total sample of 29 total residents. Specifically, for Resident #112 the facility failed to accurately complete a Level I PASRR indicating that the Resident had a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, and received Behavioral Health Services within the last two years in the community, resulting in a Level II PASRR Evaluation (an evaluation conducted to determine if an individual who screened positive for an SMI or ID/DD requires specialized services) not being completed as required. Findings include: Resident #112 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with the following diagnoses: Bipolar Disorder (a mental illness that causes extreme mood swings, from high to low, that affect your energy, thinking and behavior) and Adjustment Disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident and/or Resident Representative was provided the right to participate in the care plan process for two Residents (#2 and #122), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) For Resident #2, ensure that quarterly care plan meetings were conducted as required. 2) For Resident #122, ensure that an admission and subsequent care plan meetings were conducted as required. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, revised 4/25/22, included the following: -Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. -IDT includes: the Attending Physician, a Registered Nurse who was responsible for the resident, a nurse aide who is responsible for the resident, a member of food and nutrition services staff, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that an audiology (hearing services) appointment was arranged for one Resident (#10), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #10 was provided with audiology services as required, when the Resident voiced a concern about being able to hear adequately. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Physician Orders for Consultation dated 9/30/15, indicated the following: -To ensure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities, the facility must, if necessary, assist the resident- 1. In making appointments, and 2. By arranging for transportation to and from the office of a Practitioner specializing in the treatment of vision or hearing impairment or the office of a professional specializing in the provision of vision or hearing assistive devices. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in December…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#106) out of a total sample of 29 residents received trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, for Resident #106 who had a history of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD: a mental and behavioral disorder that developed from having experienced a traumatic event, causing flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety), the facility failed to complete an assessment and develop a care plan that included the Resident's identified PTSD triggers (certain stimuli that bring back strong memories from a traumatic event, these can include but are not limited to sounds, smells, physical actions, and thoughts, that can cause an adverse reaction). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Trauma-Informed and Culturally Competent Care, edited 12/29/22, indicated the following: *Resident Screening: -Perform universal screening of residents, which includes a brief, nonspecialized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist recommendations were responded to timely for two Residents (#71 and #58), of five applicable residents reviewed, out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #71, implement two Consultant Pharmacist recommendations directed to Nursing staff when the Resident was prescribed an antipsychotic medication (used to manage psychosis or severe mental condition when thought and emotions are affected and some contact with reality is lost). 2. For Resident #58, implement the Consultant Pharmacist recommendation to clarify the administration orders of a prescribed inhaler. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Regimen Review (MRR), effective February 2019, indicated the Consultant Pharmacist performs a comprehensive review of each resident's medication regimen and clinical record at least month. The policy also included the following: -The MRR involves a thorough review of the resident records, and may include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#73) out of a total sample of 29 residents was free of significant medication errors. Specifically, for Resident #73, the facility failed to ensure two nurses (Nurse #10 and Nurse #9) administered the correct opioid pain medication (a drug class of strong pain medications) as ordered by the Physician on two separate occasions, placing the Resident at risk for sedation (medication induced calm and/or sleepiness) and respiratory depression (slowing of breathing that can include stopping breathing all together). Findings include: Review of the Professional Standards of Practice in the Lippincott Nursing Procedures 9th Edition (2023) manual, safe medication administration is included but was not limited to the following: -Follow the five rights of medication administration: the right patient, the right medication, the right dose, the right time and the right route. -Some literature indicates use of nine rights which adds the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in a sanitary manner on two units (Kensington and [NAME]) out of five units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the medication refrigerators on the Kensington Unit and the [NAME] Unit were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Labeling and Storage, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. On 6/5/24 at 9:20 A.M., the surveyor and Unit Manager (UM) #1 conducted an inspection of the Kensington Unit medication room refrigerator. The surveyor and UM #1 observed a wet, reddish brown substance dripping down the interior back wall of the refrigerator onto a shelf where medications were stored. UM #1 said the refrigerator was dirty and definitely needed to be cleaned. On 6/5/24 at 10:30 A.M., the surveyor and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Physician Ordered lab work and diagnostic testing was obtained for one Resident (#2), of five applicable residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review, out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain yearly lab work and diagnostic testing for Resident #2 who was prescribed an antipsychotic medication (used to treat mental disorders) and had a history of breast cancer. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in January 2012 with diagnoses including Schizoaffective Disorder-Bipolar Type (condition that includes hallucinations or delusions as well as Depression or periods of excitement/euphoria), Morbid Obesity (disorder of having too much body fat), and history of Breast Cancer. Review of the June 2024 Physician's orders included the following: -Abilify (antipsychotic medication) 20 milligrams (mg) daily, initiated 10/28/22 -Electrocardiogram or EKG (a test to record the electrical signals in the heart) annually due to Abilify use, ordered 1/24/19 -Annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one Resident (#30) out of a total sample 29 total residents. Specifically, for Resident #30, the facility failed to maintain accurate and consistent medical records relative to Advanced Directives (written instructions that are provided for medical care and the individual's health care wishes i.e: MOLST [Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatments]). Findings include: 1. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with a diagnosis of Dementia. Review of the facility policy titled Advanced Directives, undated, indicated the following: -The Director of Nursing Services (DNS) or designee notifies the Attending Physician of Advance Directives (or changes in the Advanced Directives) so that appropriate orders can be documented in the resident's medical record and plan of care. Review of a MOLST form signed by the Resident on 3/18/24, indicated the following: -Do Not Resuscitate (DNR - a legally recognized order signed by the Physician at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, observations, and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who sustained two unwitnessed falls, and was later diagnosed with a C1 cervical fracture which required a cervical collar to be worn at all times, the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record when nursing failed to 1) document scheduled neurological checks following both unwitnessed falls and 2) failed to transcribe the order to wear a cervical collar at all times to prevent a high spinal cord injury, upon discharge from the hospital. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, titled Falls - Clinical Protocol, dated March 2018, indicated the following: -The staff, with the physician's guidance, will follow up on any fall with associated injury until the resident is stable and delayed complications such as late fracture or subdural hematoma have been ruled out or resolved. -Delayed complications such as late fractures and major bruising may occur hours or days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-06 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and records reviewed, for 4 of 9 sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4) who resided on a unit that the Facility intended to close for renovations on an undetermined future date, the Facility failed to ensure that prior to discharging Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4 from the Facility, that they were made aware of their right to 30 days notice of intent to discharge, that they had the right to appeal the discharge and should have been permitted to remain in the Facility until the appeal hearing was held. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated, dated October 2022, indicated that each resident will be permitted to remain in the Facility and not be transferred or discharged unless: - it is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the Facility, - it is necessary because the resident's health has improved sufficiently that the resident no longer needs the services of the Facility, - the safety of other individuals in the Facility is endangered, the health of other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and records reviewed for 4 of 9 sampled residents (Residents #1, 2, #3 and #4) the Facility failed to ensure they provided appropriate advanced written Notice of Transfer and Discharge to the Resident and/or Resident's Representative at the time the Facility initiated discharges for Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4, in accordance with the Facility Policy. Findings Include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated, dated October 2022, indicated that each resident will be permitted to remain in the Facility and not be transferred or discharged unless: - it is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the Facility, - it is necessary because the resident's health has improved sufficiently that the resident no longer needs the services of the Facility, - the safety of other individuals in the Facility is endangered, the health of other individuals in endangered, - the resident has failed to pay or submit the necessary paperwork for third party payment, or, - the Facility ceases to operate. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility and its staff failed to provide: 1) sufficient nursing staff (including Certified Nurse Assistants [CNAs]) for its Residents, and 2) staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the facility assessment, for five out of five units observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, revised August 2023, indicated the following in part: -Our facility provides sufficient number of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. -Staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff are determined by the needs of the residents based on each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-07 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — widespread
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff conducted regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment on five out of five units. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Bed Safety and Bed Rails, revised August 2022, indicated the following in part: -Maintenance staff routinely inspects all beds and related equipment to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks. During an interview on 2/1/23 at 1:53 P.M., the Director of Maintenance said that they had not completed a full house inspection of side rails since 2019 but should have as it is required to be completed annually. He further said that the facility staff utilize the Bed Safety Entrapment Kit (kit used to assess the risk of entrapment in hospital beds) to conduct an assessment that would identify areas of possible entrapment. He said they use the kit when changing out mattresses but was unable to provide documentation relative to any recent assessments that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-07 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff: 1) provided a written Notice of Transfer and Discharge to the Resident and/or Residents Representative at the time of discharge for seven Residents (#17, #79, #160, #77, #133, #143, and #126), and 2) notified a Representative in the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman when a resident was transferred from the facility for four Residents (#79, #160, #36, and #126), out of a total sample of 37 residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated, dated October 2022, indicated the following: -Notice of Transfer is provided to the resident and representative as soon as practicable before the transfer and to the Long-Term care Ombudsman when practicable . 1. For Resident #17 the facility policy was not followed as staff failed to ensure the Resident and/or the Resident's Representative was provided with a Notice of Transfer and Discharge at the time of discharge or shortly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-07 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided written notification of the Bed- Hold Policy to the Resident and/or the Resident's Representative for seven Residents (#17, #79, #160, #77, #133, #143, and #126) out of a total sample of 37 residents, who were transferred to the hospital. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Bed-Holds and Return, dated October 2022, indicated the following: -All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state Bed-Hold Policies .at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). 1. For Resident #17, a written copy of the Bed-Hold Policy at the time of discharge or shortly thereafter was not provided to the Resident and/or the Resident Representative. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in May 2022. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated the resident was discharged from the facility and admitted to the hospital in December…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff implemented the plan of care for five Resident's (#160, #95, #134, #133 and #143) out of a sample of 37 total residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last revised December 2016, indicated the following in part: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan .is developed and implemented for each resident. 1. For Resident #160 the facility failed to ensure its staff implemented a care plan relative to falls safety. Resident #160 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, Dementia, anxiety, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and difficulty walking. Review of the fall care plan indicated the following: -Maintain the bed in low position, initiated on 1/10/2023 -Bed alarm in place when the Resident is in bed. -Check for placement and function of bed alarm, initiated on 1/20/2023 Review of the Kardex (a tool…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the body to allow urine to flow) care and services relative to: 1) proper positioning of a urinary draining bag to prevent the backflow of urine into the bladder, 2) proper infection control practices for catheter care specifically ensuring catheter bags were kept off the floor to prevent infection, and 3) documented post void residuals (the amount of urine retained in the bladder after a voluntary void) and straight catheter output (the amount of urine that is voided) amounts as ordered by the Physician, for four Residents (#62, #134, #159 and #36), of six applicable residents with urinary catheters, out of a total sample of 37 residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary, dated September 2014 indicated the following: -Input/Output .Maintain an accurate record of the resident's daily output, per facility policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and in-service documentation review, the facility failed to ensure that the nursing staff received the appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary for the care and treatment of residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure annual competencies were completed and documented for two out of two certified nursing assistants (CNAs), and five out of five licensed nurses whose education records were reviewed. Findings include: According to the Board of Registration in Nursing, 244 CMR 9.00 &10.00: Standards of Conduct, Definitions and Severability; a competency is defined as the application of knowledge and the use of affective, cognitive, and psychomotor skills required for the role of a nurse licensed by the Board and for the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted standards of practice. Competency is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that its staff secured the emergency medication kits (E-kits), and that all medications were accounted for, in four out of five medication storage rooms reviewed. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 2/3/23 at 11:57 A.M., with Nurse #4 on the Kensington Unit, the surveyor observed the Emergency Combo Insulin Kit #16 to be open with items missing. Nurse #4 said she did not know when the kit was opened and could not provide any evidence that the kit had been re-ordered. During an observation and interview on 2/3/23 at 12:15 P.M., with Nurse #6 on the [NAME] Unit, the surveyor observed Emergency Combo Insulin Kit #4 to be open with items missing. Nurse #6 said she did not know how long the kit had been opened and could not provide any evidence that the kit had been re-ordered. During an observation and interview on 2/3/23 at 12:30 P.M., with Nurse #7 on the [NAME] Unit, the surveyor observed the Emergency Combo…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility and its staff failed to ensure the drug regimen for residents was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for four Residents (#103 and #92, #141 and #95), out of a total sample of 37 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) ensure PRN (as needed) orders for the psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days, and a renewal rationale documented for Resident #103, 2) ensure AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) testing was completed and side effects were monitored for the daily use of an antipsychotic medication for Resident #92, and 3) ensure PRN orders for the psychotropic medications including Trazodone were limited to 14 days, and were not renewed without prescriber rationale for the appropriateness of that medication for an extended duration for Residents #141 and #95. Review of the facility's policy titled Psychopharmacologic Medication Policy, last revised September 2018, included but was not limited to the following: - Residents who receive psychopharmacological medications have been appropriately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided meals that were palatable, and of appropriate temperatures on four out of four units observed, and ensure policies/procedures were in place for the safe reheating of food and beverage items in three out of the five unit kitchenettes observed. Findings include: During the initial pool process conducted by the survey team on 1/31/23, the following food concerns were identified by Residents/Resident Representatives: - numerous concerns that hot meals were served cold - food was inedible - chicken and potatoes were always served - the bread that sandwiches was served on were often stale and the temperature, taste and lack of alternatives were issues at the facility - the staff have to reheat everything, which makes the meat difficult to eat and the vegetables mushy or rubbery - too many carbohydrates and too much salt - gravy was very salty - no communal dining and the meals are brought served on meal trays A) On 2/6/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility and its staff failed to ensure a homelike environment was provided for two Residents (#1 and #36), out of a sample of 37 residents. Specifically, lack of functional window shade and privacy curtains. Findings include Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in August 2013. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in November 2022. During an observation and interview on 2/1/23 at 2:00 P.M., the surveyor observed both Resident #1 and Resident #36 lying in bed. The window shade next to Resident #1's bed, was drawn, with several missing slats within the middle of the window shade allowing the room to be visible from the outside and outside light to enter the room. A white pillowcase was observed hanging over the upper and lower slats on the left side of the shade. The surveyor also observed that the privacy curtain around Resident #1's bed was pulled around the left side and bottom of the bed, but did not provide privacy on the right side of the bed where the window within the room was located. During an interview at this time,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its staff initiated a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for two Residents (#77 and #143), out of a sample of 37 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to initiate baseline care plans relative to falls for both residents with previous history of falls. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans- Baseline, revised March 2022, indicated: a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight hours of admission and includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident. a) Resident #77 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses of muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of a clinical note dated 12/30/22 at 22:25 (10:25 P.M.) indicated that the resident had an unwitnessed fall and complained of bilateral pelvic pain. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-07 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff developed a discharge plan for one Resident (#17) out of a sample of 37 residents. Findings Include: Review of the facilities job description for a Social Worker indicated the following: -Coordinates discharge planning and assists with developing an organized discharge plan for all residents. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in May 2022. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #17 scored a 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment indicating that he/she was cognitively intact. During an interview on 1/31/23 at 9:52 A.M., Resident #17 said his/her plan was to transfer to another skilled nursing facility but that he/she had not heard any more from the Social Worker regarding the transfer. Review of the Resident's medical record indicated no Social Work documentation regarding discharge planning since 6/3/22 when the Social Work note indicated the Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided foot care for one Resident (#36), out of a total sample of 37 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure diabetic foot care was provided to maintain good foot health per facility policy and professional standards. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Foot Care, revised 10/2022, indicated that residents will receive appropriate care and treatment in order to maintain mobility and foot health. The policy also included the following: -residents are provided with foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. -overall foot care includes the care and treatment of medical conditions to prevent foot complications from these conditions (for example: diabetes (condition that results in high levels of sugar in the blood), immobility .) Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) article titled 'Diabetes and Your Feet', dated 6/20/22, indicated that nerve damage can occur with diabetes which most often…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained an environment that remained free of accident and hazards. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1) safely maintain unlocked and unattended medication and treatment carts, and 2) appropriately monitor and secure medications, on two (Kensington and [NAME]) of five units. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications, revised November 2020, indicated the following: -the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe and secure manner and administer medications have access to locked medications -compartments containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use -unlocked medication carts are not left unattended. 1. During an observation on 2/1/23 at 8:37 A.M., the surveyor observed an unlocked treatment cart in the corridor across from the nurse's station on the Kensington Unit. During an observation on 2/1/23 at 10:44 A.M., the surveyor observed that the treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure its staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with their policy and manufacturer recommendations on two out of five units. Specifically, the facility: 1) failed to remove expired medication from the medication cart, 2) failed to properly label medication when opened, and 3) failed to ensure an unopened insulin kit was refrigerated. Review of the policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated [DATE], indicated the following: -Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls. -Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. -Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. -Medications requiring refrigeration are stored in a refrigerator located in the drug room at the nurses' station or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided documented evidence of the ongoing assessment of an Arteriovenous Fistula (AV- connection between artery and vein that is used to provide dialysis) site for one Resident (#17) receiving dialysis (a procedure where a machine filters waste and toxins from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly), out of a total of 37 sampled residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Hemodialysis Pre and Post Care, revised 3/2010, indicated the following: -Routes of hemodialysis treatments will be monitored for potential complications or infections . -Treatment sites are to be assessed regularly . -Access sites should be inspected for signs and symptoms of inflammation or infections process; bruit and thrills . Ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for one Resident (#15), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure timely repair of a cracked second floor bedroom window for Resident #15 when it had been reported to the facility 84 days prior.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Homelike Environment, revised February 2021, indicated the following:-Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.-The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting.Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses including Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Depression, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). During a telephone interview on 8/14/25 at 4:16 P.M., Resident Representative (RR) #2 said that Resident #15 had a large crack in their bedroom window on the second floor. RR #2 further said he/she had asked the facility staff in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · No revisit needed

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,720 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,720 — penalty dated 2025-10-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 36 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Care One At MillburyMillbury, MA 1 of 5Care One At RandolphRandolph, MA 1 of 5Careone At OradellOradell, NJ 2 of 5Care One At BrooklineBrookline, MA 2 of 5Care One At NewtonNewton, MA 2 of 5Care One At WeymouthWeymouth, MA 2 of 5CareOne At Hanover TownshipWhippany, NJ 2 of 5Careone At MiddletownAtlantic Highlands, NJ 2 of 5Rehab & Nursing Ctr Greater PittsburghGreensburg, PA 3 of 5Care One At LexingtonLexington, MA 3 of 5Care One At LowellLowell, MA 3 of 5Care One At New BedfordNew Bedford, MA 3 of 5CareOne At Madison AvenueMorristown, NJ 3 of 5CareOne At MoorestownMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5CareOne at New MilfordNew Milford, NJ 3 of 5Careone At East BrunswickEast Brunswick, NJ 3 of 5Careone At Ridgewood AvenueParamus, NJ 3 of 5Careone At WellingtonHackensack, NJ 4 of 5Care One At ConcordW Concord, MA 4 of 5Care One At Essex ParkBeverly, MA 4 of 5Care One At NorthamptonNorthampton, MA 4 of 5CareOne At TeaneckTeaneck, NJ 4 of 5CareOne at The HighlandsEdison, NJ 4 of 5Careone At CresskillCresskill, NJ 4 of 5Careone At EveshamMarlton, NJ 4 of 5Careone At LivingstonLivingston, NJ 4 of 5Careone At ParsippanyParsippany Troy Hill, NJ 4 of 5Careone At Somerset ValleyBound Brook, NJ 5 of 5Care One At HolyokeHolyoke, MA 5 of 5Care One At PeabodyPeabody, MA 5 of 5Care One At WilmingtonWilmington, MA 5 of 5CareOne At WallWall, NJ 5 of 5Careone At HolmdelHolmdel, NJ 5 of 5Careone At ValleyWestwood, NJ 5 of 5Careone At WayneWayne, NJ 5 of 5River Glen Health Care CenterSouthbury, CT

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THCI OF MASSACHUSETTS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2003
CARE REALTY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/30/2002
DES-I 2016 GRATOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2021
STRAUS, DANIELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2003
BARUCH, DAVIDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021
HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2003

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-19.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.9M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 11%Other / private 23%

This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$398per resident / day
operating cost
$12,107per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$332per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225299. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next