Careone At Parsippany

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 401 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 101 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 97.9 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the dignity of 2 unsampled residents during the lunchtime meal in the 2 of 3 dining rooms observed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. 1.The surveyor observed the lunchtime meal in unit 2 dining room on 12/15/25 at 12:44 PM, there were seven residents and Certified Nursing Aide #1 (CNA #1). CNA #1 at that time was standing while feeding Resident #44 (unsampled resident) with use of a weighted spoon. The resident had three compartment dish plate. On that same date, the surveyor went to the nursing station just across the dining room, to find a nurse, and the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) was at the phone at that time. The Unit Clerk (UC) then assisted the surveyor, both the surveyor and the UC went back to the dining room and both observed CNA #1 still standing while feeding Resident #44. Outside the dining room, both the UC and the surveyor observed CNA #1 standing and continued to feed the resident. The UC acknowledged that CNA #1 was standing while…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1 of 18 resident's (Resident #9) call bell was within reach and able to use to accommodate the residents' needs. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 12/15/25 at 11:20 AM, while conducting the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #9 in their room, and in bed. The surveyor also observed the call bell was on the floor, not on the bed, and not within the reach of the resident if needed to use. The surveyor then asked the resident if they used the call bell if they needed help and if the staff came to help, and the resident shrug their shoulders. At this time, a Certified Nurses Aide (CNA), came into the room and notices the surveyor looking for the call bell device. The CNA then placed the call bell device on the bed next to the resident, after surveyor's observation. The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (eMR) of Resident #9, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly complete in writing the issued required beneficiary notice for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification, (Residents #7 and #44). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1.On 12/17/25 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor reviewed the provided Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification (SNFBPN) Review completed by the facility for Resident #44, and revealed: -The SNFBPN Review indicated Resident #44 last covered Medicare A day was 12/3/25, and Resident #44 remained in the facility. The SNFBPN Review further revealed that a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) form with blanks (no information provided) for the following information to be filled out in the form:=care(s) area that no longer occurring daily (to determine why the services were to stop for Medicare A coverage),=the estimate cost in dollar amount per day per item or service,=the options to check to determine what…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint NJ #409369Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to; a.) ensure that the acute transfer must be documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information was communicated to resident or resident representative (RR) including the reserve payment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #106) reviewed and b.) ensure the discharge summary must include accurate information of the resident and was acknowledged by the RR to ensure safety and orderly discharge for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #110) reviewed.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 12/16/25 at 9:43 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) reviewed the hybrid medical records (combination of electronic and paper medical records) of Resident #106, and revealed: A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/9/24 and 11/28/25, reflected that the resident had an unplanned transfer to acute hospital. A review of the electronic medical record, under forms, there were two Notice of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise a comprehensive care plan to reflect the current status of the residents, a.) with regard to appropriate infection control precautions for 1 of 4 residents, (Resident #83) reviewed for infection control and b.) specifically discontinue a care plan for a resident with discontinued indwelling catheter for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for urinary catheter. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/15/25 at 10:09 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) observed Resident #4 sitting up in bed. S #1 interviewed Resident #4, in the presence of the resident representative (RR), who stated that when they first were admitted to the facility that they had an indwelling catheter but that it was removed and that they were recently hospitalized . A review of Resident #4's admission Record or face sheet (AR; an admission summary) reflected that the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accurate daily report of licensed nurses, certified nursing assistant staffing, and the resident census was posted at the beginning of the current shift for 2 of 5 days of observation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 12/15/25 at 9:00 AM, the survey team entered the facility, and the surveyor observed the Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) posted at the front desk by the receptionist. The NHRCSR posted was dated 12/15/25 with a census of 85, for the [7:00 AM - 3:00 PM] day shift. On 12/15/25 at 9:41 AM, in the presence of the survey team, the License Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided a copy of the alphabetical census (total number of residents) with the total census listed as 90. LNHA confirmed the total census of residents in the facility and stated, The census is 90. On 12/16/25 at 9:00 AM, the NHRCSR posted in the lobby of the facility documented the current Resident census as 90. The LNHA then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident did not receive an unnecessary medication for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #113) observed on the medication pass observation. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 12/16/25 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor, while conducting the medication pass (med pass) observation, observed the Registered Nurse (RN) assigned to the medication (med) cart administer medications (meds) to Resident #113. The resident told the RN that they had leg pain and that it was a level 4. At that time, the surveyor observed the RN prepare and administer acetaminophen (a med commonly used to treat pain, commonly known as Tylenol), 325 mg (milligram), 2 tablets (tabs).The surveyor concluded the med pass observation. The surveyor reviewed Resident #113's electronic medical record (EMR), which revealed an Order Summary report (OSR) and an electronic medication administration record (eMAR) each of which reflected the following physician order (PO):…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medication per manufacturer specifications and standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 emergency medication kits (e-kit) on 1 of 1 medication storage areas observed in the facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling, and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. On [DATE] at 11:48 AM, the surveyor began to inspect selected medication (med)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a facility wide assessment was reviewed and updated to identify the required services and procedures necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all residents to ensure adequate facility resources to provide resident care and services, specifically a contingency plan for staffing and the mandatory staffing ratios. These failures had the potential to affect all 90 residents who currently live in the facility during the time of the survey. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:During the entrance conference on 12/15/25 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and both the LNHA and DON (Director of Nursing) stated that the facility's census (the number of residents currently under the care of a specific facility) was 90 plus 1 bed hold (1 resident was in the hospital) and their licensed bed number (the number of beds the facility has to admit residents) was 118. On 12/15/25 at 11:45…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete, accurate, and readily accessible medical records for a resident's History and Physical. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 21 residents reviewed, Resident #109.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #109, and revealed that the resident was in the facility for respite care (temporary relief for family caregivers by providing short-term substitute care for a loved one). A review of the diagnoses included but not limited to anoxic brain damage not elsewhere classified and depression. \ A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool which facilitates the plan of care, with an assessment reference date of 10/8/25, revealed short term memory problem and cognitive skills for daily decision making-moderately impaired. On 12/16/25 at 10:11 AM, the License Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the closed record-paper chart for Resident #109 for review,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ