CareOne At Moorestown

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 664 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 172 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 61.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.20 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 for one resident (Resident (R) 87) of two residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 31 residents. This failure had the potential to negatively impact all residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility provided admission Record indicated that R87 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and hallucinations. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/05/25, indicated that R87 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine of 15 which indicated R87's cognition was moderately impaired. Further review indicates that R87 had no behaviors. Review of the facility provided Individual Statement Form given by R87 dated 12/25/25 indicated, Time 1:15 PM 12/25/25-I was standing beside my bed to get into my…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0555 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's admission Agreement and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide information regarding a resident's right to choose an attending physician for one (Resident (R)1) of three sampled residents reviewed for facility's admissions process in a total sample of 21 residents. This had the potential R1's rights not to be upheld and honor his/her right to have a physician of his choice.Review of the facility's policy titled, admission Agreement dated 08/18, indicated, Policy statement All residents must have a signed and dated admission agreement on file. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. At the time of admission, the resident (or his/her representative) must sign an admission agreement (contract). 2. The admission agreement (contract) will reflect all charges for covered and non-covered items, as well as identify the parties that are responsible for payment of such services . 4. A copy of the admission agreement is provided to the resident or his/her representative (sponsor), and a copy placed in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a hazard free environment for one of five residents (Resident (R) 8) reviewed for accidents out of a total sample of 21 residents. During a staff assisted transfer R8 suffered harm when the metal frame of his/her bed which had exposed openings with rough edges cut his/her leg and resulted in a large laceration which required sutures at a hospital emergency room (ER) to close the wound.Review of the facility's policy titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents dated 07/21, indicated, Policy statement Our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. Policy Interpretation and Implementation Facility Oriented Approach to Safety . 2. Safety risks and environmental hazards are identified on an ongoing basis through a combination of employee training, employee monitoring, and reporting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered in a sanitary manner for two of five (Residents (R)18 and R20) observed during medication administration out of a total sample of 21 residents. This failure could lead to potential resident infections due to contamination.Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications revised April 2019 revealed . 25. Staff follows established facility infection control procedures e.g., handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for the administration of medications, as applicable.1.During an observation on 08/05/25 at 8:20 AM of R18's medication administration revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)2 dropped a furosemide (a diuretic) tablet on the top of the medication cart and then put the tablet in the administration cup and administered the furosemide tablet to R18.During an interview on 08/05/25 at 8:30 AM LPN2 stated that because the pill only dropped on the medication cart, she put it in the administration cup. When asked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain daily weights for 7 out of 20 daily weights ordered for a resident with congestive heart failure that required daily weights to monitor fluid retention. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #302), and was evidenced by the following: On 9/23/24 at 7:39 PM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #302 in their bedroom lying in bed watching television. Resident #302 was receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula (tubing that administers oxygen through the nose). On 9/25/24 at 11:16 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #302. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission record) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to; acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (body cannot get rid of carbon dioxide which prevents blood cells from carrying oxygen), asthma (inflammation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) store nebulizer equipment in a manner to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #302); and b.) administer and accurately document breathing exercises using an incentive spirometer tool as ordered by the physician for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for incentive spirometry therapy (Resident #5, Resident #401, and Resident #402). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 9/23/24 at 7:39 PM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #302 in their bedroom lying in bed watching television. The surveyor observed the nebulizer machine with attached face mask and tubing lying directly on the resident's nightstand. The nebulizer tubing and face mask were not in use, and not placed in a bag which exposed both to air and contamination. On 9/25/24 at 11:16 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct yearly performance reviews of Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) to provide specific education based on the outcomes of the reviews. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 5 CNAs reviewed for education (CNA #1, #2, #3, and #4), and was evidenced by the following: During entrance conference on 9/23/24 at 6:55 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) to provide a list of all the facility's CNAs with their date of hire. On 9/25/24 at 12:10 PM, the surveyor requested from the LNHA to provide all education from 2023 and the most recent performance evaluation for five selected CNAs (CNA #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5). On 9/26/24 at 9:40 AM, the surveyor reviewed the performance evaluations provided by the LNHA which revealed the following: CNA #1 was hired on 9/23/20. The last performance evaluation was completed 2022, and signed by the employee with no date of signature documented. CNA #2 was hired on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) ensure the accountability of the narcotic shift count logs were completed; b.) accurately account for and document the administration of controlled medications; and c.) ensure medications were stored appropriately in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage, and was evidenced by the following: 1. During medication storage review on 9/24/24 at 10:08 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1), reviewed the [NAME] nursing unit's medication cart's August and September 2024 New Jersey Control Drug Index (a shift-to-shift controlled substance and narcotics (narc) count sheet signed by the incoming and outgoing nurses each shift) which revealed the following: The narcotic counts Cards, Packs, Bottles and nursing signatures were blank for the incoming nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by ensuring all newly hired employees were screened for potential abuse by conducting criminal background checks prior to hire. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 10 staff (Staff #4) reviewed for newly hired employees, and was evidenced by the following: A review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy with an edited date of 4/5/18, included .as part of the resident abuse prevention, administration will: 1. Protect our residents from abuse by anyone, including but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies, family members, legal representatives, friends, visitors, or any other individual. 2. Conduct employee background checks and will not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has a. Have been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property or mistreatment, by a court of law; b. have had a finding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) initiate an investigation at the time a facility acquired pressure ulcer was discovered on 9/18/24, to rule out neglect. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions and pressure ulcers (Resident #402), and was evidenced by the following: Reference: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2650/table/ch12.t2/ National Pressure Ulcer Staging System: Deep Tissue Injury: A pressure-related injury to subcutaneous tissues under intact skin. Initially, these lesions have the appearance of a deep bruise, and they may herald the subsequent development of a Stage III-IV pressure ulcer, even with optimal treatment. Definition: Purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure and/or shear. Characteristics: The area may be preceded by tissue that is painful, firm, mushy, boggy, warmer, or cooler, as compared to adjacent tissue. Deep tissue injury may be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAREONE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ