Garden Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 154 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 94.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 144.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY00297184) initiated on 1/5/2023 and completed on 1/13/2023, the facility staff did not effectively implement interventions to prevent an avoidable accident. This was identified for 1 (Resident #47) of five residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #47 required two-person assistance for bed mobility as per the resident's assessments and care plans. On 6/8/2022, the assigned Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 provided incontinent care to Resident #47 independently and did not seek assistance from another staff member. Resident #47 rolled out of the bed and fell to the floor and sustained a Hematoma (pool of mostly clotted blood that forms in an organ, tissue, or body space) to the frontal lobe, and Ecchymotic (bruise) areas to the left eye, nose, and face. Subsequently, Resident #47 was transferred to the hospital and was diagnosed with orbital and pelvic fractures. This resulted in actual harm to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was identified on three (3) (Unit 1, Unit 2 and Unit 3) of three (3) resident units reviewed for the Sufficient Nursing Staffing Task. Specifically, the facility triggered for the low weekend staffing metric on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report for Quarter two, Quarter three, and Quarter four of Fiscal Year 2025. A random sampling of facility nursing staffing assignments did not reflect the staffing numbers as stipulated in the Facility Assessment for Certified Nursing Assistants, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Registered Nurses. The finding is:The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year 2025, Quarter two (2) (January 1st-March 31), Quarter three (03) (April 1st-June 30th) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments. This was identified for one (1) of three (3) medication storage rooms observed during the Medication Storage task. Specifically, two medication cabinets, inside the central supply room, containing over the counter medication supply were left unlocked. The central supply room door lock was malfunctioning causing the door to remain unlocked.The finding is:The facility policy and procedure for Labeling and Storage of Drugs and Biologicals, last reviewed/revised on July 2025 documented that over-the-counter medications maintained in Central Supply shall be secured to prevent unauthorized access. The room shall remain locked when unattended. Access is limited to authorized personnel, including nursing administration and designated staff. During an observation and interview with the facility Assistant Administrator on 03/02/2026 at 01:53 PM, the central supply room located on the facility's basement floor was inspected. The basement included a resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure that it established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #124) of five (5) residents observed during medication administration. Specifically, during the medication pass observation on 02/26/2026, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 did not perform hand hygiene and administered the eye drops while wearing the same gloves they had used to administer the oral medications and respiratory treatment to the resident. The finding is:The facility policy titled Eye Drop Administration, dated 8/2025, documented eye medications will be administered in a safe and effective manner. The first step in the procedure is to put on examination gloves. The policy did not indicate to wash hands first. The policy states with a gloved finger, gently pull down the lower eyelid to form a pouch and instill the eye drops.Resident #124 was admitted with diagnoses including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/26/2024 and completed on 8/30/2024 the facility did not ensure that each resident with Pressure Ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was identified for three (Resident #38, Resident #5, and Resident #82) of eight residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, 1) Resident #38 had multiple pressure ulcers and had a physician's order to use a low-air loss mattress for pressure relief. During multiple observations, the adjustable weight setting for the air mattress, which is meant to correspond to the resident's weight, was not set accurately. 2) Resident #5 had a history of Moisture Associated Skin Damage to the left buttock. Resident #5 had an order for a low-air loss mattress. During multiple observations, the adjustable weight setting for the air mattress was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/26/2024 and completed on 8/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed for each resident prior to their admission to the facility to determine that the individual requires the level of services provided by the nursing facility and whether the individual requires specialized services. This was identified for one (Resident #29) of 26 residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). Specifically, Resident #29 was admitted to the facility in October 2023. There was no documented evidence that a Level 1 Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed prior to Resident #29's admission. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR) last revised on 6/26/2024 documented that the admission coordinator will ensure a screen is completed before admission for all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during a Recertification Survey initiated on 8/26/2024 and completed on 8/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, Resident #1 with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus had a physician's order to monitor the resident's blood glucose level as per the facility's protocol. The facility policy indicated reporting the findings to the Physician if the blood glucose levels were less than 100 milligrams/Deciliter or greater than 300 milligrams /Deciliter. Resident #1's blood glucose levels were less than 100 milligrams/Deciliter or greater than 300 milligrams /Deciliter on 27 occasions in July 2024 and on 13 occasions in August 2024 and the resident's Physician was not notified as per the facility protocol. Additionally, the insulin injection sites were not documented in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/26/2024 and completed on 8/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. This was identified for one (Third Floor) of three units observed during the initial tour. Specifically, a full oxygen E-Cylinder tank (portable oxygen tank) was observed in the third-floor day room that was not secured in a rolling safety stand or a metal rack. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled Oxygen Therapy last revised on 5/2024 documented that safety devices in valves or cylinders shall never be tampered with. Cylinders shall not be chained to portable or movable apparatus such as beds and tables. Even if they are considered empty, cylinders shall never be used as rollers, supports, or for any other purpose other than that for which they are intended by the supplier. Cylinders and containers shall not be dropped, dragged, or rolled. Cylinders shall not be supported by, and neither cylinder nor container shall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/26/2024 and completed on 8/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for two (Resident #5 and Resident #82) of two residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, 1) Resident #5 had a physician's order to continuously receive oxygen therapy at 2 liters per minute. The resident was observed receiving an inaccurate amount of oxygen therapy on 8/26/2024, 8/27/2024, and 8/28/2024. 2) Resident #82 had a physician's order to continuously receive oxygen therapy at 2 liters per minute. The resident was observed receiving an inaccurate amount of oxygen therapy on 8/26/2024, 8/27/2024, and 8/28/2024. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Oxygen Therapy revised on 5/2024 documented that oxygen therapy must be ordered by a Physician or Nurse Practitioner and the flow rate of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/26/2024 and completed on 8/30/2024 the facility did not ensure that it maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of infectious diseases. This was identified for one (Resident #67) of three residents reviewed for tube feeding. Specifically, Resident #67 had a physician's order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions for the use of a gastrostomy tube (feeding tube inserted through the stomach for artificial feeding). During an observation, Registered Nurse Supervisor #2 was observed entering Resident #67's room without the use of Personal Protective Equipment (gown and gloves) and disconnected the tube feeding from the gastrostomy tube. The finding is: The facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 5/06/2024 documented that Enhanced Barrier Precautions are indicated for residents with central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00320341), the facility failed to protect one of three residents reviewed for Accidents (Resident #1). Specifically, Certified Nurse Assistant #1 (CNA #1) failed to follow the plan of care which required two people to assist for toileting and bed mobility. CNA #1 proceeded to provide incontinet care (in the bed) alone causing Resident #1's head to strike the bedside table resulting in a laceration. The laceration required Resident #1 to be transfer to the hospital and six sutures. This was evidenced by: Resident #1 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented resident is rarely/never understood. MDS documented resident requires extensive assistance of two person for bed mobility, transfer, and toilet use. The MDS further documented the resident had limitation in range of motion in both upper and lower extremities. The policy and procedure titled Activities of Daily Living dated 1/2023 documented the Resident will have their needs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENJAMIN LANDA — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY