No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rockville Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center,

50 Maine Avenue, Rockville Center, NY 11570 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 66 certified beds · (516) 536-8000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (516) 536-8000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 10 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
200 N Village Ave · (516) 764-7300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
30 Hempstead Ave · (516) 764-6161 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
80 N Park Ave · (516) 608-2200 · Call to confirm hours
Park
11 Maine Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
96 N Centre Ave · (516) 764-8311

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.5%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.5%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.3%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.1%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.4%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.3%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.0%19.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.9%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.6%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.3%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.1%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.681.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.381.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 237 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
79.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.90U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.45hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.38hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 79.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 153 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.90 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.2%CMS range 46.9–61.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 8.2–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge79.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge86.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge80.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.7–9.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.331.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.61
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
33.3%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 64.3 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-27)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-22)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/23/2025 and completed on 6/27/2025, the facility did not ensure services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, met professional standards of quality. This was identified for one (Resident #58) of four residents observed during Medication Administration. Specifically, Resident #58 had a Physician's order for 150 milligrams of Topiramate (a medication to treat migraine headaches) daily. From 6/4/2024 to 6/25/2024, multiple medication nurses did not ensure the resident received the correct dosage of Topiramate 150 milligrams. Multiple nurses administered 100 milligrams and inaccurately documented that they administered 150 milligrams of Topiramate, 1.5 tablets. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Medication Administration and Documentation-General, dated 1/2024, documented that medication administration and documentation shall occur in a timely and accurate manner. The nurse assesses all medications that are due for administration at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/23/2025 and completed on 6/27/2025, the facility did not ensure it provided pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident. This was identified for one (Resident #58 of four residents reviewed for Medication Administration. Specifically, on 6/3/2024, Resident #58 had a new Physician's order for Topiramate 100 milligram tablet, give 1.5 tablet (for 150 milligrams) one time a day for a diagnosis of headaches. During the medication pass observation on 6/24/2024, it was revealed that the Topiramate 1.5 tablet (150 milligrams) order was never delivered by the pharmacy, and the resident continued to receive the discontinued dose of 100 milligrams of Topiramate for approximately 20 days. The finding is: The facility policy titled Provider Pharmacy Requirements, dated 8/2020, documented that regular and reliable pharmaceutical service is available to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/23/2025 and completed on 6/27/2025, the facility did not ensure that it maintained all patient care equipment in a safe operating condition. This was identified for one (Resident #161) of two residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #161 had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin loss, where the damage extends into the subcutaneous tissue) and had a care plan intervention for the use of an air mattress. There were multiple observations of the low-pressure light flashing on the air mattress pump before the facility staff replaced the air mattress. The finding is: The facility's undated policy titled Use of Low Air Loss Systems/Air Mattress documented that low air loss systems are medical devices designed to prevent and manage pressure ulcers by providing air circulation to reduce pressure and moisture on the skin. Low-air-loss systems should be installed according to the manufacturer's guidelines and checked by facility staff for compliance with safety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00326729) initiated on 12/19/2023 and completed on 12/22/2023, the facility did not ensure each resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was identified for one (Resident #68) of three residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #68 was assessed to be at a moderate risk for developing pressure ulcers. On 8/26/2023 the resident's Physician ordered a wheelchair gel cushion as a pressure relieving device. There was no documented evidence that the resident received the gel cushion until 10/19/2023. The resident was identified to have a Stage 2 sacral pressure ulcer on 10/19/2023. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment dated January 2022 and last revised January 2023, documented that new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 12/19/2023 and completed on 12/22/2023, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (Resident # 317) of four residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #317 was administered oxygen therapy without a Physician's order since the resident's admission to the facility on 9/28/2023 until 12/19/2023. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Oxygen Administration, last revised on 10/20/2023 documented that oxygen use must be documented in the medical record. Oxygen therapy is administered by way of an oxygen mask, nasal cannula, and /or nasal catheter. Before administering oxygen. While the resident is receiving oxygen therapy, an assessment must be documented for signs or symptoms of hypoxia and cyanosis. Resident#317 was admitted with Diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 12/19/2023 and completed on 12/22/2023, the facility did not ensure that a physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist provide orders for each resident's immediate care and needs. This was identified for one (Resident #318) of seven residents reviewed during the Medication Administration task. Specifically, Resident #318 had a Physician's Order to administer Midodrine (medication used to treat low blood pressure); however, the order did not include blood pressure parameters regarding when to hold the medication and when to call a Physician. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Medication Administration/Physician Orders, last revised on 7/24/2023 documented that vital signs are recorded in the Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR). The eMAR shall serve as the source from which all medications are documented and to use prudent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and the Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00261362) completed on 12/9/2021 the facility did not consult with the resident's Physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical or mental status for one (Resident #205) of one resident reviewed for Choices. Specifically, Resident #205 had a Physician's Order to monitor Blood Pressure (BP) weekly, and to call the Physician for a Systolic BP less than 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or greater than 140 mmHg. On 7/23/2020 the resident's BP was documented as 83/46 mmHg and there was no documentation in the resident's medical record that the resident's Physician was made aware of the resident's low BP. The finding is: Resident #205 has diagnoses which include Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Malignant Neoplasm of the Colon. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) The facility's policy, titled Pressure Ulcer-Prevention and Care, effective 5/1/2021, documented that aseptic technique is used for all dressing changes unless otherwise ordered. Resident #158 was admitted with diagnoses including left heel unstageable Pressure Ulcer and Metabolic Encephalopathy. The admission Nursing assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident had an unstageable left heel ulcer and a Stage 3 ulcer to the left lateral lower leg. A physician's order dated 12/3/2021 documented to apply Betadine Topical Solution, one applicator full by topical route once daily to the left heel after cleaning with Normal Saline and pat dry for diagnosis of Pressure Ulcer of left heel. During an observation of Resident #158's left heel wound care, performed by LPN #1, on 12/6/2021 at 10:08 AM LPN #1 placed a barrier under the left leg, removed the existing dressing from the left heel, and allowed the heel to rest directly on the barrier. The left heel was observed with an eschar (dead skin tissue). LPN #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 12/9/2021 the facility did not ensure that each resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (Resident #158) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, Resident #158 had an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel and had a physician's order to offload the heels. On two separate observations, the heels were not offloaded. Additionally, a wound consult recommended bilateral heel boots on 12/2/2021; however, the care plan and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) accountability record were not updated to include the heel boots until 12/6/2021. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Pressure Ulcer-Prevention and Care, effective 5/1/2021, documented that nursing interventions are added as needed to prevent pressure ulcers and to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and the Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00255243) completed on 12/9/2021, the facility did not ensure that each physician provided orders to meet the resident's care needs timely. This was identified for one (Resident #105) of one resident reviewed for Pain. Specifically, Resident #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had orders to receive Dolophine (Methadone - Opioid Analgesic) for Abdominal Pain. The medication Methadone was not available in the facility until 8/22/2019 (6 days after the Physician's order) due to a delay in the Pharmacy not receiving a narcotic prescription from the resident's Physician until 8/21/2019. Additionally, Resident #105 was not administered Methadone on 8/27/2019 and 8/28/2019 when the emergency supply of Methadone delivered to the facility on 8/22/2019 ran out and a standing narcotic prescription was needed from the Physician. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENJAMIN LANDA — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.4+1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.5+1.5 vs chain
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Christian Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePembroke, KY 1 of 5Golden Gate Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterStaten Island, NY 1 of 5River Haven Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPaducah, KY 1 of 5Salyersville Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterSalyersville, KY 1 of 5Silver Healthcare CenterCherry Hill, NJ 2 of 5Brookwood Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing CenteHomestead, FL 2 of 5Cumberland Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterSomerset, KY 2 of 5Elizabethtown Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterElizabethtown, KY 2 of 5Golfview Nursing CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 2 of 5Homestead Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterNewton, NJ 2 of 5Southern Pines Nursing CenterNew Port Richey, FL 2 of 5The Five Towns Premier Rehabilitation & Nursing CeWoodmere, NY 2 of 5Westside Oaks Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Bay Breeze Rehabilitation By HarborviewGulf Breeze, FL 3 of 5Brookhaven Rehab & Health Care Center L L CFar Rockaway, NY 3 of 5Franklin-Simpson Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterFranklin, KY 3 of 5Golfcrest Nursing CenterHollywood, FL 3 of 5Hardinsburg Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHardinsburg, KY 3 of 5Henderson Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHenderson, KY 3 of 5Ormond Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterOrmond Beach, FL 3 of 5Pinnacle Multicare Nursing and Rehabilitation CentBronx, NY 3 of 5Premier Nursing and Rehab Center of Far RockawayFar Rockaway, NY 3 of 5Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterStanton, KY 4 of 5Campbellsville Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterCampbellsville, KY 4 of 5Fordsville Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterFordsville, KY 4 of 5Graceville Rehabilitation By HarborviewGraceville, FL 4 of 5Grand Boulevard Health And Rehabilitation CenterMiramar Beach, FL 4 of 5Gulf Valor Rehabilitation By HarborviewPensacola, FL 4 of 5Irvine Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterIrvine, KY 4 of 5Marianna Nursing And Care CenterMarianna, FL 4 of 5Middleburg Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterMiddleburg, FL 4 of 5Orange Park Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterOrange Park, FL 4 of 5Specialty Health And Rehabilitation CenterPensacola, FL 4 of 5Spring Creek Rehabilitation & Nursing Care CenterBrooklyn, NY 4 of 5Surrey Place Nursing CenterLive Oak, FL 4 of 5The Grandview Nursing and Rehabilitation FacilityCampbellsville, KY 4 of 5Woodcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterElsmere, KY 5 of 5Arcadia Health And Rehabilitation CenterPensacola, FL 5 of 5Bayside Health And Rehabilitation CenterPensacola, FL 5 of 5Chautauqua Springs Health CenterDefuniak Springs, FL

Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LICHTSCHEIN, TEDDYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 01/01/1999
TELLER, MITCHELLIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 01/01/1999
WELGE, SUSANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/24/2012

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 39%Medicare 39%Other / private 21%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$542per resident / day
operating cost
$16,474per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$554per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335747. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next