Emerald Pointe Health And Rehab Ctr
100 Michelli Street, Barnesville, OH 43713 · For profit - Corporation · 64 certified beds · (740) 425-5400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.6% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.8% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.1% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.5% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.9% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.70 | 1.73 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.56 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.0%CMS range 44.3–65.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.5%CMS range 8.8–17.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.2–11.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 61.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #62 received all medication doses a physician ordered intravenous (IV) antibiotic. This affected one (Resident #62) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 61. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute pyelonephritis, sepsis, bacteremia, urinary tract infection (UTI), acute kidney injury (AKI), anemia, polyneuropathy, hyperlipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), obstructive and reflux uropathy, and calculus of kidney with calculus of ureter. Resident #62 was discharged on 11/22/25.Review of facility November 2025 infection control log revealed Resident #62 was receiving IV antibiotics beginning 11/11/25 and ending on 11/22/25.Review of Resident #62 history and physical completed by Medical Director #600 on 11/12/25 revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility to continue antibiotics…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician notification of a resident's blood pressure when outside of listed blood pressure parameters. This affected one resident (#27) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 63. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including breast cancer, chronic kidney disease, cardiac murmur, atrial septal defect, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency and urinary tract infection. Review of the nurse practitioner Nurse's Note dated 06/08/23 revealed to discontinue amlodipine 5 milligrams (mg) due to edema. Continue atenolol 50 (mg) and lisinopril 10 (mg) daily. Monitor blood pressure (BP) and consider increasing lisinopril if greater than (>) 130/80 mmHg with close monitoring of BMP. Continue atorvastatin 20 (mg) and will obtain echocardiogram due to murmur. Review of the cardiology advanced practice professional Progress Note dated 08/21/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to develop comprehensive and individualized care plans. This affected one resident (#3) of two residents reviewed for Communication-Sensory concerns. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end-stage macular degeneration and cerebral infarction. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making, had highly impaired vision (object identification in question but eyes appear to follow objects) with corrective lenses and had obvious, likely cavities or broken natural teeth. Review of the Eye Care Chart Note dated 12/04/24 revealed the resident complained of right eye poor vision for many years and glasses help the left eye a little. The resident's visual acuity of the right eye was 20/80 and his visual acuity of the left eye was 20/30. On 02/24/25 between 3:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure identification, assessment, and appropriate interventions were put in place to achieve [NAME] bowel function for Resident #13, Resident #46, and Resident #51. This affected three residents (#13, #46, and #51) out of four residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. Facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, asthma, cognitive communication, acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease stage 4, and urinary retention. A care plan dated 11/07/24 revealed Resident #13 was at risk for constipation. Interventions included to administer medication as ordered and monitor for constipation and causes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact, occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. Resident #13 required substantial/maximal assistance for toilet hygiene and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive unnecessary medication when a resident was administered antibiotics not at the ordered dose. This affected one resident (#27) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 63. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including breast cancer, chronic kidney disease, cardiac murmur, atrial septal defect, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency and urinary tract infection. Review of the Progress Note dated 02/06/25 revealed facility had received a call from Resident #27's urology office stating the urinalysis done at their office showed the resident had an UTI. The physician office sent in an order for Bactrim DS (antibiotic) twice a day to be administered for 10 days. A Physician order was written and the antibiotic was started on 02/07/25 and administered through 02/17/25. Review of the electronic Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, and interview with staff revealed the facility failed to ensure safe storage of medications. This affected one resident (#7) of five residents reviewed for accidents. Finding included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of the T5 and T6 vertebra, fracture of one rib, ankylosing spondylitis of the thoracic, acute respiratory failure, muscle weakness, dysphagia, pneumonia, hemothorax, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular, hyperglycemia, gout, vertigo, osteoarthritis, chronic pain syndrome, chronic rhinitis, major depressive disorder, hypertension, hypothyroidism, insomnia and a pacemaker. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had intact cognition. Review of the February 2025 physician's order revealed Resident #7 had an order for Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Suspension 50 micrograms,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's nephrologist was notified of abnormal laboratory results. This affected one resident (#27) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 63. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including breast cancer, chronic kidney disease, cardiac murmur, atrial septal defect, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency and urinary tract infection. Review of the Comprehensive Metabolic Panel dated 07/26/24 revealed BUN (blood urea nitrogen) was 28 (normal 7-17 mg/dL), creatinine 1.40 (normal 0.5-1.0 mg/dL), BUN/Crea ratio was 20 (normal was 6-20) and estimated GFR was 41 (normal >60 mL/min/L). Physician #279 ordered to follow-up with Resident #27's renal physician (nephrologist) regarding the above lab results. Review of the Comprehensive Metabolic Panel dated 01/02/25 revealed abnormal laboratory findings including: BUN was 37 (normal 7-17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate and thorough medical records were maintained. This affected three residents (#13, #18, and #34) of 19 residents sampled. The census was 63. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, anemia, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, cellulitis, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, arthritis. Record review of the minimum data set 3.0 (MDS) assessment completed on 01/20/25 revealed a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of 14, which indicated Resident #34 was cognitively intact. Record review of the MDS section N for medications completed on 01/30/25 revealed Resident #34 was on antibiotics. Record review revealed an order placed on 01/29/25 by the Medical Director for antibiotic oral capsule 500 milligram (mg) (Cephalexin) to be given 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for right hand cellulitis for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the medical record and interview with staff the facility failed to appropriately monitor a resident experiencing signs and symptoms of a contagious respiratory illness and failed to implement contact isolation precautions for a resident with an infectious microorganism in the urine. This affected one resident (#21) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care and one resident (#27) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic usage. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, asthma, acute respiratory failure, schizophrenia, psychosis, hypertension, fibromyalgia, sleep apnea, migraine, generalized anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, and insomnia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had intact cognition and refused the influenza vaccine. Review of the February Medication Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were not ordered without meeting the required criteria for Resident #32. This affected one resident (#32) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic use. Facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, hydronephrosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, type 2 DM, urinary tract infection, acute kidney failure with tubular necrosis, and paraplegia. A care plan dated 08/09/24 revealed Resident #32 was at risk for infection related to suprapubic catheter, type 2 diabetes, and urinary retention. Interventions included to administer antibiotics as ordered and monitor of signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection. A health status note dated 12/23/24 at 3:22 A.M. revealed Resident #32 reported testicle pain. Resident #32 reported he usually had a urinary tract infection when he felt testicle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview, review of camera footage, employee statement review and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services, including appropriate supervision levels, to prevent resident neglect. This affected one resident (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for neglect. The facility census was 58. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, muscle weakness, osteoporosis, vertigo, anxiety, and restlessness and agitation. Review of Resident #10's care plan, dated 05/23/23, revealed the resident was at risk for alteration in comfort with interventions including to reposition the resident for comfort. Further review revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to weakness, poor safety awareness, osteoporosis, glaucoma, vertigo,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of camera footage, employee statement review, self-reported incident review, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident neglect to the state survey agency This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for neglect. The facility census was 58 Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, muscle weakness, osteoporosis, vertigo, anxiety, and restlessness and agitation. Review of Resident #10's care plan, dated 05/23/23, revealed the resident was at risk for alteration in comfort with interventions including to reposition the resident for comfort. Further review revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to weakness, poor safety awareness, osteoporosis, glaucoma, vertigo, and anxiety with interventions including to encourage and remind the resident to ask for assistance and to monitor/anticipate/intervene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a medication error report and the facility's related investigation, resident interview, staff interview, review of employee personnel files, and policy review, the facility failed to have competent nurse staffing to ensure medications were administered to residents to meet professional standards of nursing. This affected two residents (#41 and #44) of four residents reviewed. Findings include: 1 a.) Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic ischemic heart disease, hypertension (HTN), and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. She was not known to have displayed any behaviors or reject care during the seven days of the assessment period. Review of Resident #44's physician's orders revealed she received the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bathing and showers were provided as requested. This affected one resident (#14) of three residents reviewed for showers. The census was 58. Findings include: Review of Resident #14's record revealed a 10/29/20 admission with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease, depressive disorder, vitamin D deficiency, pruritus, chronic pain syndrome, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety disorder, dementia, and cough. Review of the 01/04/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment revealed the resident was independent for daily decision making, dependent of two or more for shower/bathing, and resident does none of the effort to complete activity. Interview on 02/26/24 at 1:35 P.M. with Resident #14 revealed she was to get a shower every Monday. She said it has been two weeks and they have not asked her if she wanted a shower. Review of shower sheets included the resident received one shower in January 2024 on 01/24/24, with no refusals noted. In February 2024 the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives and physician were notified of changes in treatment and condition. This affected two residents (#59, #61) of three residents reviewed for notification. The census was 58. Findings include: 1. Record review of Residents #61 revealed a 09/09/22 admission with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, proximal atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, sick sinus syndrome, chronic kidney disease stage four, psoriasis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, aortic aneurysm, peripheral vascular disease, anemia in chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, Anxiety, Gastroesophageal reflux disease, hemiplegia, gout, constipation, angina pectoris, overactive bladder, insomnia, Hydronephrosis, chronic pain syndrome, vitamin D deficiency, macular degeneration, cough, puritis, shortness of breath, hyperglycemia, old myocardial infarction, personal history of neoplasm with the breast, personal history of pulmonary embolism and dry eye syndrome. Review of the quarterly 01/15/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was in place related to a blister from spilled coffee. This affected one resident (#15) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions. The census was 58. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed a 07/01/18 admission with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus without complications, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, diastolic congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, essential primary hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, hyperlipidemia, arthritis, iron deficiency anemia, morbid severe obesity, hypokalemia, Gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis,allergic rhinitis, adjustment disorders with depressed mood, vitamin D deficiency, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following a surgical amputation, muscle weakness, and a personal history of Covid. Review of a quarterly 01/09/24 Minimum Data Set Assessment indicated the resident was independent for daily decision making, with lower extremity impairment on one side, Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely intervention for a resident with nausea and vomiting. This affected one resident (#61) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The census was 58. Findings include: Record review of Residents #61 revealed a 09/09/22 admission with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, proximal atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, sick sinus syndrome, chronic kidney disease stage four, psoriasis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, aortic aneurysm, peripheral vascular disease, anemia in chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, Anxiety, Gastroesophageal reflux disease, hemiplegia, gout, constipation, angina pectoris, overactive bladder, insomnia, Hydronephrosis, chronic pain syndrome, vitamin D deficiency, macular degeneration, cough, puritis, shortness of breath, hyperglycemia, old myocardial infarction, personal history of neoplasm with the breast, personal history of pulmonary embolism and dry eye syndrome. Review of the quarterly 01/15/24 Minimum Data Set Assessment included the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure reduction measures were in place as ordered. This affected two residents (#4, #15) of three residents reviewed for skin impairment. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #4 revealed a 01/24/24 admission with diagnoses including hemiplegia,hemiparesis following cerebral infarct affecting left non dominate side, protein calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, dysphasia, muscle wasting and atrophy, proximal atrial fibrillation, tremor, hypercalcemia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, pulmonary hypertension, major depressive disorder, hypertension, iron deficiency, anemia, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, pain, nausea and vomiting, urine retention, and benign prosthetic hyperplasia. Review of a 01/31/24 admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) revealed the resident was independent for daily decision making, had upper extremity impairment on one side, and required maximum assist for turning and rolling in bed. Review of a 02/15/24 Pressure Skin Grid revealed a right heel unstageable (full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate medical records. This affected two residents (#4, #15) of three residents reviewed for skin impairment. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #4 revealed a 01/24/24 admission with diagnoses including hemiplegia,hemiparesis following cerebral infarct affecting left non dominate side, protein calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, dysphasia, muscle wasting and atrophy, proximal atrial fibrillation, tremor, hypercalcemia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, pulmonary hypertension, major depressive disorder, hypertension, iron deficiency, anemia, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, pain, nausea and vomiting, urine retention, and benign prosthetic hyperplasia. Review of a 01/31/24 admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) revealed the resident was independent for daily decision making, had upper extremity impairment on one side, and required maximum assist for turning and rolling in bed. Review of a 02/15/24 Pressure Skin Grid revealed a right heel unstageable (full thickness tissue loss where the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, in room camera video review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility education review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #63 received a dignified experience during a meal service and during incontinence care. This affected one resident (#63) of three residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: A review of Resident #63's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Down's Syndrome, senile degeneration of the brain, muscle weakness, depression, and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #63's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had unclear speech and was sometimes able to make herself understood. She was sometimes able to understand others. Her vision was moderately impaired without the use of any corrective lenses. She had short and long term memory impairment and her cognitive skills for daily decision making was severely impaired. She was known to have hallucinations, physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of videos from an in room camera, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility education information, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred in a safe and orderly manner. This affected one resident (#63) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: A review of Resident #63's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Down's Syndrome, senile degeneration of the brain, muscle weakness, depression, and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #63's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had unclear speech and was sometimes able to make herself understood. She was sometimes able to understand others. Her vision was moderately impaired without the use of any corrective lenses. She had short and long term memory impairment and her cognitive skills for daily decision making was severely impaired. She was known to have hallucinations, physical behaviors directed at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on in room camera video review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were followed during feeding assistance and with the provision of incontinence care. This affected one resident (#63) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: A review of in room camera videos from Resident #63's room revealed there were nine separate videos that lasted between 14 seconds to one minute and 27 seconds in length. Six of the nine videos (videos #1, #2, #3, #4, #6, and #9) involved feeding assistance that was provided to Resident #63 by State Tested Nursing Assistant #16. Two of the nine videos were of Resident #63 receiving incontinence care as provided by State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #45 and #68. Of the six videos that showed Resident #63 being assisted with her meal, five of the videos (video #1, #2, #4, #6, and #9) had identified infection control concerns. STNA #16 was observed in those videos to be seated on the resident's bed assisting her with her meal. The aide was observed to wipe her nose with the outside of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to store foods properly to prevent spoilage and/or contamination. This had the potential to affect 51 residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (Resident #155) as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 52. Findings included: Observation on 04/10/23 at 8:15 A.M. of the kitchen revealed the following items in the walk-in refrigerator which were opened and not dated: one large bag of mixed green salad, one squeeze bag of whipped cream, and a partial ham wrapped in aluminum foil. There was also one resealable plastic bag of hot dogs, dated 04/08/23, with the seal not completely closed. Observation on 04/10/23 at 8:23 A.M. of the following items in the reach in the dining refrigerator which were opened and not dated: one large container of International Delight Amaretto coffee creamer which was one-half full. Observation on 04/10/23 at 8:25 A.M. of the cooks' reach in refrigerator revealed the following items, opened, and not labeled or dated: a five-gallon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Identification Screen was accurate. This affected one resident (Resident #3) of one resident reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 52. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/18/10. Additional diagnoses were added including generalized anxiety entered 05/15/12, major depressive disorder recurrent, unspecified entered 08/25/15, and unspecified psychosis not due to substance or known physiological condition entered 08/25/15. Review of Resident #3's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and had active diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression and a psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia). Review of Resident #3's PASARR dated 03/16/23 revealed in Section E: Indications of serious mental illness, the diagnoses of mood disorder was marked with an X.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure care planning conferences were conducted quarterly. This affected one Resident (Resident #27) of one resident reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 52. Findings included: Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 12/22/20 with diagnoses including fibromyalgia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/15/23, revealed she was moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #27's care conferences revealed care conferences were conducted on 09/23/21, 10/28/21, 05/19/22, 08/18/22 and 02/23/23 Review of Resident #27's progress notes revealed she declined a care planning conference on 11/28/22 and had a care planning conference scheduled 02/22/23. There was no documentation to confirm the care planning conference scheduled for 02/22/23 occurred. Interview on 04/10/23 at 11:20 A.M. with Resident #27 revealed she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with activities of daily living. This affected one resident (Resident #35) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 52. Findings included: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 07/17/18 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, type two diabetes, essential hypertension, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #35's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/18/23, revealed she was cognitively impaired and needed limited assistance of one person with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #35's current care plan revealed she required assistance with ADLs and may be at risk of developing complications associated with decreased ADL self-performance (weakness, pain, impaired cognition, wheelchair for mobility and non-ambulatory). Interventions included resident can groom (nails, shave,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to properly store nebulizer masks for two residents (Resident #3 and Resident #9) and failed to change oxygen tubing weekly for one resident (Resident #14). This affected three residents (Resident #3, #9 and #14) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, pneumonia, and unspecified cough. Review of current medication orders revealed Resident #9 was ordered Albuterol Sulfate inhalation solution 2.5 milligrams per three milliliters four times per day via nebulizer for unspecified cough. Observation of Resident #9, on 04/10/23 at 11:31 A.M., revealed the resident was in their room, seated in a wheelchair and receiving two liters of oxygen via nasal cannula. A nebulizer machine (used to administer breathing treatments) was sitting on a nightstand. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were discontinued per physician orders. This affected one resident (Resident #15) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 52. Findings included: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/09/22 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, chronic kidney disease - stage four, essential hypertension, and hemiplegia affecting the left nondominant side. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/25/23, revealed she was not cognitively intact and during the assessment period, received one day of an antibiotic. Review of Resident #15's progress note dated 01/24/23 at 2:58 P.M. revealed a urinalysis result was reviewed by the physician and ampicillin 500 milligrams (mg) bid (twice a day) for three days was ordered. The progress note was entered by Registered Nurse (RN) #163. Review of Resident #15's physician orders revealed an order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an appropriate diagnosis for a resident receiving an antipsychotic medication. This affected one resident (Resident #48) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 0/19/22. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia with psychotic disturbance, hypertension, muscle weakness, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/26/23, indicated Resident #48's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 04, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The resident did not have any hallucinations, delusions, physical or verbal behaviors, or rejection of care. Review of a psychiatric nurse practitioner progress note, dated 02/06/23, revealed the resident did not have behaviors or paranoia. Review of a physician progress note, dated 02/25/23, revealed the resident denied depression, anxiety, or nervousness. Review of a physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure outside garbage was contained in a receptacle. This had the potential to affect all 52 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Observation on 04/11/23 at 11:25 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #102 revealed two garbage dumpsters in the back corner of the facility parking lot. Each dumpster had two lids which could be moved to create an approximate six-inch gap between them. There was a large amount of garbage observed on the ground. The garbage started around six feet from the dumpsters and went down the hill into the woods approximately 20 yards. An interview at the time of the observation with DS #102 revealed she believed raccoons got in the dumpsters and took out items. She stated the garbage down the bank into the woods was from raccoons and the garbage had been down the bank and into the woods for quite a long time. Interview on 04/11/23 at 1:55 P.M. with the Administrator verified garbage should be in the dumpsters and not scattered down the hill.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the appropriate transmission based precautions were posted for a resident in isolation. This affected one resident (Resident #36) of one resident reviewed for transmission based precautions. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 05/04/21 with diagnoses including Guillain-Barre syndrome (a rapid- onset muscle weakness caused by the body's immune system damaging the peripheral nervous system), type two diabetes mellitus without complications, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/09/23, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #36's physician order dated 03/31/23 to 04/10/23 revealed he was on contact isolation for Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) (a staph bacteria that has become resistant to many of the antibiotics used to treat ordinary staph infections and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, Loeb's Minimum Criteria for Initiating Antibiotic Therapy review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents met the minimum criteria for initiating antibiotic use. This affected one resident (Resident #15) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 52. Findings included: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/09/22 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, chronic kidney disease - stage four, essential hypertension, and hemiplegia affecting the left nondominant side. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/25/23, revealed she was not cognitively intact and during the assessment period, received one day of an antibiotic. Review of Resident #15's progress note dated 01/24/23 at 2:58 P.M. revealed a urinalysis result was reviewed by the physician and ampicillin 500 milligrams (mg) bid (twice a day) for three days was ordered. The progress note was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-05-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the facility assessment and interview the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing levels to provide timely care and services including assistance with activities of daily living, individualized activity programs, and weekend activities. This affected 12 (Residents #9, #36, #34, #151, #26, #2, #27, #42, #5, #14, #28 and #44) and had the potential to affect all 48 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, chronic pain, osteoporosis, and cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident required extensive assistance of one person for bathing. Review of Resident #9's self-care deficit plan of care revealed interventions included to bathe per the resident's preference and to see the bathing schedule. Review of Resident #9's current shower schedule and bathing preference revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-05-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a sustainable plan of correction to correct staffing deficiencies identified and cited during previous survey activity exited 04/12/21. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of survey activity Statement of Deficiencies from a previous survey with an exit date of 04/12/21 revealed deficient practices were identified with staffing and activities of daily living. During the current survey, deficient practices were identified with staffing and activities of daily living. Review of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy, dated 11/28/17, revealed the QAPI program would address performance improvement processes and a system for tracking performance to ensure improvements were realized and sustained. The Administrator was responsible for ensuring the QAPI program was sustained during transitions of leadership and staffing, the QAPI program was adequately resourced, including ensuring staff time,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility shower schedule, review of bathing preferences, review of the facilities shower preference and shower documentation process, and interviews the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were provided showers per their schedule/preference. This affected eight (Resident #5, #14, #28, #34, #36, #41, #44, and #151) of nine reviewed for bathing/showers. The current census was 48. Findings include: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, chronic pain, osteoporosis, and cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident required extensive assistance of one person for bathing. Review of Resident #9's self-care deficit plan of care revealed her intervention included to bathe per the resident's preference and to see bathing schedule. Review of Resident #9's current shower schedule and bathing preference revealed Resident #9 requested showers twice weekly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the activity schedule, review of the facility assessment, and interviews the facility failed to timely comprehensively assess resident preferences for activities and failed to provide activities on the weekend per preferences. This affected four (Residents #2, #26, #27, and #42) and had the potential to affect all 48 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, diabetes, major depressive disorder, aphasia, hemiplegia, dysphagia, and difficulty walking. Review of Resident #26's plan of care revealed no evidence of an activity plan of care. Review of Resident #26's activity assessments revealed no evidence of an activity assessment was completed. Review of Resident #26's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed no evidence the activities and preference section F was completed. Review of Resident #26's activity documentation dated April 01, 2021 to May 19, 2021…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure prescription drugs were dated when opened and properly stored in their original packaging. This affected three residents (Resident #1, #13 and #16) whose medications were found opened and not dated and had the potential to affect all 48 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, hypertension, and vitamin d deficiency. Review of Resident #1's [DATE] physician orders revealed an order for Fluticasone propionate suspension 50 micrograms to be administered one spray in each nostril one time a day for nasal congestion. Observation on [DATE] at 2:06 P.M. of the 400 hall medication cart with Registered Nurse (RN) #62 revealed Resident #1's Fluticasone nasal spray was opened, but was not labeled with the date it was opened. Interview on [DATE] at 2:10 P.M. RN #62 confirmed than nasal spray was open and should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #200's urinary catheter bag was covered to maintain dignity. This affected one out of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident #14 and Resident #200). The facility census was 48. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #200 revealed an admission date of 05/12/21 with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, hypertension, and chronic ischemic heart disease. Review of Resident #200's May 2021 physician's orders revealed an order for an indwelling urinary (Foley) Catheter to gravity drainage related to intractable pain. Observations on 05/17/21 at 10:38 A.M. and 05/18/21 at 8:37 A.M. revealed Resident #200's bedroom door was open and the resident's Foley catheter drainage bag and tubing were exposed and visible from the hallway. Interview on 05/18/21 at 8:56 A.M. Director of Nursing (DON) #35 confirmed that Resident #200's catheter bag and tubing was exposed and visible from the hallway. Review of the facility's admission packet which contained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #24, who had indicators of serious mental illness, had a pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) completed to determine whether the resident qualified for Level II services. This affected one (Resident #24) of one reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's current mental health diagnoses include schizoaffective disorder, psychosis, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and mental disorder. Review of Resident #24's problematic manner plan of care revealed risk related to inappropriate behaviors as evidence by easily angered, irritable, unstable mood, cures at staff and family members at times, anxiousness, and repetitive concerns. The resident demonstrated difficulty adjusting to change in routine, attempted to manipulate staff/family members, and had a poor appetite at times. The resident stated feelings of sadness, little interest in group…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #32 received treatments per her physician's orders and Resident #28's skin intervention were in place. This affected two of three residents reviewed for skin conditions (Residents #24, #28 and #32). The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, diabetes mellitus type two, and dementia. Review of Resident #32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility and two person extensive assistance for transfers. Review of the facility provided skin grid documentation, dated 05/17/21, revealed Resident #32 had Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) that was first noted on 05/05/21. Review of Resident #32's May 2021 physician's orders revealed an order from 05/06/21 to 05/10/21 for zinc oxide to buttocks every six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were administered per physician orders. This affected one (Resident #26) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, cerebral infarction, Parkinsonism, type two diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #26's orders and Medication Administration Records (MAR) dated 04/2021 to 05/2021 revealed to apply zinc to right upper buttocks every six hours and as needed. There were 38 times the zinc was not signed off as administered per the orders. Review of Resident #26's alteration in skin integrity plan of care revealed the resident had pressure areas on the left heel, the right buttocks, and on the right heel. The intervention included to provide treatments per physician orders. Review of Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) wound notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to provide range of motion services to two (Residents #14 and #24) of 16 residents observed for and/or interviewed regarding range of motion. The facility identified eight residents with contractures. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), muscle spasms, and chronic pain syndrome. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact and was able to make herself understood. The MDS indicated Resident #14 had functional limitation in range of motion (ROM) to both upper and both lower extremities. There were no orders, no care plan, and no record of any ROM services. On 05/17/21 at 11:45 A.M. Resident #14 verified she had limitations in ROM of all her joints due to quadriplegia. Resident #14 reported she did not get ROM services provided, even during hands on care. On 05/18/21 at 5:16 P.M. State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure catheter care for a resident in accordance with the plan of care and physician's orders. This affected one (Resident #14) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility identified eight residents with indwelling urinary catheters. Findings include: During an interview on 05/17/21 at 11:39 A.M. Resident #14 reported she had an indwelling urinary catheter since March of 2020. Upon inquiry about catheter care, Resident #14 stated she did not receive routine catheter care. Catheter care was provided during showers once or twice a week. Resident #14 indicated she was very prone to urinary tract infections, especially since the catheter was initiated. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs) and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. On 12/04/20, a physician's order was written for Foley catheter care every shift and as necessary. A plan of care initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed during catheter care for Resident #200. This affected one of two residents reviewed for the use of indwelling urinary catheters (Resident #200 and #14). The facility census was 48. Findings include: Resident #200 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, hypertension, and chronic ischemic heart disease. Review of Resident #200's May 2021 physician orders revealed an order for an indwelling urinary catheter (Foley) to gravity drainage related to intractable pain, and for catheter care every shift. Observation on 05/19/21 at 2:45 P.M. of catheter care for Resident #200 revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #16 gathered supplies, washed her hands, and donned gloves. The Director of Nursing (DON) was present and helped position the resident. STNA #16 began by cleaning the tubing of the catheter from the point of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the infection control log, review of antibiotic stewardship log, review of Loeb and McGeer criteria, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of antibiotics. This affect two (Resident #18 and #19) of four reviewed for infections. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Closed record review revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI) and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. Review of Resident #18's progress note dated 03/31/21 revealed the resident continued to have gross hematuria (blood in the urine). The resident denied urinary pain or discomfort. Review of Resident #18's progress notes dated 04/03/21 revealed the resident returned from the emergency room with an order for Bactrim DS (antibiotic) to be given twice daily for 10 days for hematuria. Review of Resident #18's urine culture report dated 04/03/21 revealed there was no growth.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received pneumococcal immunizations timely. This affected two (Residents #151 and #200) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Resident #151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension and cough. Review of Resident #151's updated consents revealed the resident and physician had signed consents for pneumococcal consent. Review of Resident #151's medical record revealed no evidence the resident had received the pneumococcal vaccine. 2. Resident #200 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease, kidney failure, and shortness of breath. Review of Resident #200's consents dated 05/13/21 revealed the resident representative had signed consent for the pneumococcal vaccine. Review of Resident #200's medical record revealed no evidence the resident had received the pneumococcal vaccine. Interview on 05/19/21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-05-27 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and review of residents rights, the facility failed to ensure mail delivered on weekends was provided to residents in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: During a meeting with resident council members on 05/18/21 at 10:04 A.M., Residents #27 and #42 reported residents were only able to receive mail on Monday through Friday. No mail was delivered on Saturdays. On 05/18/21 at 10:14 A.M., Activity Director #31 stated when mail was delivered to the facility, the Business Office Manager sorted mail or that she (Activity Director #31) would sort through the mail for cards or items she was sure needed delivered to residents then the mail was delivered. Activity Director #31 indicated she and the Business Office Manager worked Monday through Friday. On weekends, nurses and nursing assistants would deliver newspapers. If a package was delivered for a resident on Saturday nursing staff would deliver the package but not the mail. On 05/19/21 at 11:35 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #64 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-05-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility new hire list, review of timecards, review of Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) log, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the facility maintained a comprehensive BCI log. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility new hire staffing list dated 04/20/21 to 05/20/21 revealed the facility hired 16 new staff including State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #200, Temporary Nurse Aide (TNA) #28, Hospitality Aide (HA) #201, STNA #202, Registered Nurses (RN) #203, HA #204, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #205, HA #206, STNA #207, and HA #208. Review of timecards for 05/2021 revealed STNA #200's first day providing direct care was 05/03/21, TNA #28's first day of direct care was 05/04/21, and HA #204's first day of work was 05/20/21. Review of the BCI log revealed no evidence STNA #200, TNA #28, HA #201, STNA #202, RN #203, HA #204, LPN #205, HA #206, STNA #207, and HA #208 were listed on the BCI log. Interview on 05/25/21 at 8:53 A.M., with the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 4.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLLERAN, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2019 |
| KRYSTOWSKI, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2018 |
| FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2019 |
| WOJTASEK, KYLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| PATCHA, HIMALAYA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $960K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366352. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.