McNaughten Pointe Nursing And Rehab
1425 Yorkland Road, Columbus, OH 43232 · For profit - Individual · 124 certified beds · (614) 751-2525 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 30.4% | 30.1% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.1% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.8% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.9% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.1% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 71.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.9% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.80 | 1.73 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.3%CMS range 31.8–66.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.8–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 34.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 25.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 83.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.6–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 110.0 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.79 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, review of a fall investigation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide timely and effective pain management as well as adequately monitor resident pain. Actual harm occurred on 01/11/24 when Resident #65 fell, complained of pain to her right ankle, was not provided effective pain management, and was subsequently unable to get out of bed on 01/12/24 due to increased pain associated with the fall. The resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] at 6:52 P.M. (approximately 24 hours after the fall occurred) with complaints of right ankle pain. The resident required Oxycodone-Acetaminophen for pain. Upon assessment, the resident's ankle was resting in an extremely plantarflexed position (top of the foot pointed away from leg) with mild swelling and tenderness to palpation (indicates objective painful symptoms) about the medial and lateral ankle (the inside and outside portions of the ankle). The x-ray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, staff and resident interview, review of facility policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, the facility failed to appropriately obtain consent and timely administer a flu and pneumococcal immunizations. Actual harm occurred on 02/29/24, when Resident #104 was diagnosed with pneumonia and was hospitalized for ten days for treatment including intravenous antibiotic therapy. The resident's representative gave permission for the resident to receive the pneumococcal vaccination on 02/01/24 (admission); however, the facility failed to administer the vaccination to the resident. This affected two (Residents #89 and #104) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 117. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an original admission date of 02/01/24. Resident #104 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted back to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were not prepared and removed from the original packaging prior to time of medication administration. This affected eight (Residents #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and #11) of the eight residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 122. Findings include:Observation completed on 06/23/26 from 3:51 A.M. through 4:11 A.M. of five medication carts revealed medication for eight residents (#3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and #11) residing on the East unit had been pulled from their original package provided by the pharmacy and placed in a medication cups for administration at a later time. An interview on 06/23/26 at 3:58 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #202 confirmed medication for eight residents (#3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and #11) had been pre pulled from their original package and placed in medication cups to be administered at 5:00 A.M. The actual medication administration time was at 6:00 A.M. for most of the residents, but they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the practitioner was timely notified of ongoing symptoms of nausea and holding of tube feeding administration for Resident #118. This affected one (Resident #118) of three residents reviewed for tube feeding management. The facility census was 116.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #118 revealed an admission date of 10/08/25 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, dependence on respirator status, dependence on renal dialysis, osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral, and sacrococcygeal region, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, and gastrostomy status. Resident #118 discharged from the facility on 10/24/25.Review of Resident #118's physician orders for October 2025 revealed an order dated 10/09/25 for Novasource Renal (an enteral nutrition formula) at 40 ml per hour (ml/hr) over 22 hours via g-tube (gastrostomy tube) and 10 ml/hr water flush over 22 hours; may be held every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper incontinence care was completed for Resident #40. This affected one of four residents reviewed for incontinence care (Resident #15, #25, #20 #10). The census was 118.Findings include:Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/20/24. Diagnoses include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, memory deficit following other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, generalized muscle weakness, unqualified visual loss right eye and normal vision to left eye.Review of Resident #40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09. Review of Resident #40's functional abilities revealed Resident #40 was dependent on staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered wound care treatments were accurately followed. This affected one (Resident #28) out of four residents reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of Resident # 28's medical record revealed that he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cervical 5 to cervical 7 incomplete quadriplegia, chronic pain syndrome, congestive heart failure, dysphagia, contracture of right hand, contracture of left hand, depressive disorder and insomnia. Review of Resident # 28's care plan dated 06/30/21, revealed a focus for alteration in skin integrity as evidenced by pressure ulcer present at the right buttocks with staff intervention to provide treatment(s) per physician order(s). Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #28 was non ambulatory and dependent on staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation and root cause analysis regarding falls for Resident #59 and failed to ensure adequate supervision, a thorough investigation and root cause analysis were completed for Resident #92 who fell while on an unknown (to facility staff) leave of absence by himself. This affected two residents (#59 and #92) out of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 112.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #59 was admitted on [DATE] and re-entered on 03/18/25 with diagnoses including right heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea, dysphagia, gastrostomy status, personal history of sudden cardiac arrest, anemia, Down syndrome, restlessness and agitation, constipation, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to obtain cultures and sensitivities prior to administering antibiotics for multiple episodes of urinary tract infections (UTIs) for Resident #36. This affected one (Resident #36) of three residents reviewed for UTIs. The facility census was 112.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 08/27/19 with diagnoses that included morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (unspecified), dysuria, and lower abdominal pain (unspecified).Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance including wheelchair use, setup for eating and oral hygiene, total dependence for toileting, bathing, lower-extremity dressing, and putting on/off footwear; maximal assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the American Nurse's Association standards of professional nursing practice, the facility failed to ensure specified parameters were obtained and recorded during medication administration. This affected one resident (#121) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 117.Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #121 revealed an admission date of 04/22/25 and discharge date of 05/15/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to Tracheostomy, chronic respiratory status, dependence on ventilator, dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, gastrostomy, epilepsy, pleural effusions, vascular dementia, Down Syndrome, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and depression.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not able to be completed because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of resident council minutes, review of audio/video footage, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was afforded privacy and dignity during care. This affected one resident (#46) of four residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/11/25 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, dependence on a ventilator, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction unspecified side. Review of Resident #46's admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was rarely or never understood and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Review of audio/video footage taken from Resident #46's room via an audio/video monitoring camera that was placed in the resident's room with the video time stamp dated 03/17/25 at 2:36 P.M. revealed the resident to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of audio/video footage and review of Centers for Disease Control Guidelines for Enhanced Barrier Precautions, the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were implemented to prevent the spread of infection. This affected one Resident (Resident #46) of four residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/11/25 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, dependence on a ventilator, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction unspecified side. Review of Resident #46's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be rarely or never understood and to be dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #46 had an enteral feeding tube and a tracheostomy. Review of audio/video footage taken from Resident #46's room via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to offer/complete therapy orders as expected. This affected one (Resident #64) of three resident medical records reviewed. The census was 125. Findings Include: Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, type II diabetes, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, anemia, congestive heart failure, hyperlipidemia, mild cognitive impairment, insomnia, anxiety disorder, age related nuclear cataract, macular degeneration, and hyperkalemia. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/13/24, revealed she had a mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #64 physician orders, dated 10/15/24, revealed she was ordered physical therapy three to five times per week, for 30 days. Review of Resident #64 physical therapy notes, dated 10/15/24 to 10/31/24, revealed her rolling week of therapy was from Tuesdays to Monday. During the first week of ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medication storage refrigerator daily temperature logs, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication storage refrigerators were maintained at an appropriate temperature and the temperature was routinely monitored. This affected one (South Unit) medication storage room out of three medication storage rooms in the facility and had the potential to affect all 25 residents (#1, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, #11, #12, #13, #15, #19, #20, #38, #39, #56, #57, #59, #64, #78, #85, #87, #91, #92, #98, and #108) who received medications from the South Unit medication storage room. The census was 117. Findings include: Review of the South Unit medication storage refrigerator daily temperature log for January 2024 and February 2024 revealed four daily temperature entries for the entire month of January 2024 and no daily temperatures for the entire month of February 2024 Observation of the medication storage room located on the South Unit on 03/06/24 at 11:10 A.M. revealed the medication storage refrigerator daily temperature log…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of meal choice sheets, the facility failed to ensure residents were consistently offered meals according to their choices and preferences. This affected two (Residents #34 and #46) out of two residents reviewed for food choices and had the potential to affect all eight Residents (#33, #34, #46, #52, #89, #95, #97, #107) living on the North Hall who receive meals from the kitchen. The census was 117. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 06/13/23. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, vent dependence, diabetes, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #34's physician orders, dated 08/22/23, revealed an active order for a regular textured diet with low concentrated sweets and no added salt. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/08/24, revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 and required set up assistance for eating. Review of the Plan of Care, dated 02/11/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment was provided for two Residents (#8 and #9) of two reviewed for homelike environment. Facility census was 117. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 12/29/21. Diagnoses included quadriplegia c5-c7 incomplete, respiratory failure, dysphagia, and contracture of multiple unspecified sites. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 and required substantial/maximum assistance dependence on staff for mobility and hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated 02/14/24 revealed resident had oral intake with help of tube feeds with interventions to provide tube feeding as ordered, dressing changes to the tube site and flushes as ordered. Observation and interview on 03/04/24 at 10:49 A.M. revealed resident had a metal cart with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and record review ,the facility failed to ensure care conferences were held with members of the interdisciplinary team including resident participation. This affected two Residents (#57 and #64) of three reviewed for care conferences. Facility census was 117. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 04/18/23. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, diabetes, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 and required substantial/maximal assist and dependence on staff for activities of daily living. Review progress notes dated 01/09/23 revealed a care conference was held with son upon request as well as a meeting on 02/07/23. Progress note dated 06/30/23 revealed family was sent an invitation to schedule a care conference. Progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and record review, facility failed to ensure a resident with hand contracture's was provided with nail trimming and care. This affected one Resident (#8) of one reviewed for nail care for dependent residents. Facility census was 117. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 12/29/21. Diagnoses included quadriplegia c5-c7 incomplete, respiratory failure, dysphagia, and contracture of multiple unspecified sites. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 and required substantial/maximum assistance dependence on staff for mobility and hygiene. The MDS also revealed resident had an upper extremity impairment. Review of the plan of care dated 02/14/24 revealed resident required total assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) due to decreased self-performance with diagnoses of spinal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of skin grid assessments, review of the wound Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) notes, review of an After Visit Summary, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete timely and accurate skin grid assessments, implement treatment changes timely, and follow up on the wound CNP recommendations timely for one resident (Resident #71). The facility also failed to follow up on discharge recommendations as indicated in the After Visit Summary following a hospitalization for one resident (Resident #71). This affected one resident (Resident #71) of one reviewed for non-pressure skin care. The facility census was 117. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an initial admission date on 01/29/24 and a discharge date on 03/08/24. Medical diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, asthma, dependence on respirator (ventilator) status, tracheostomy status, anoxic brain damage, and persistent vegetative state.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, observations, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure accurate and timely wound assessments and care was provided for three residents (#51, #71, and #89) out of four residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 117. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #51, revealed an admission date of 10/20/23. Diagnoses included: moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychosis disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, and end stage renal disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of resident is rarely/never understood. The resident was assessed to be dependent with all bed mobility. Review of nursing admission skin assessment for Resident #51 dated 10/20/23 revealed three wounds. Wound #1 was sacrococcygeal moisture-associated skin damage (MASD), wound #2 was a left heel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #85) out of two residents reviewed for falls. The census was 117. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of 12/07/22. Diagnoses included hypercholesterolemia, osteoporosis, mild cognitive impairment, artificial right and left hip joints, insomnia, and muscle weakness. Review of the progress note, dated 12/20/23, revealed Resident #85 was observed on the floor in a sitting position. The STNA informed the nurse who came to assess the resident. Resident #85 had reported she was coming from the bathroom and wanted to get in bed. An assessment was completed and no injuries were identified. The new intervention was for a call don't fall sign. Resident #85 was educated to ask for assistance when going to the bathroom. Review of the fall investigation, dated 12/20/23, revealed Resident #85 was found sitting on her bottom on the floor in her room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure ventilator setting checks were completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #71) out of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility also failed to ensure respiratory equipment was clean and changed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #83) out of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 117. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an initial admission date of 01/29/24 and a discharge date of 03/08/24. Medical diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, asthma, dependence on respirator (ventilator) status, tracheostomy status, anoxic brain damage, and persistent vegetative state. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/10/24, revealed Resident #71 was in a persistent vegetative state with no discernible consciousness. Resident #71 was totally dependent on one to two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #48) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 117. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM), heart disease, congestive heart failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #48's signed physician order, dated 06/01/22, revealed an order for insulin lispro solution (fast acting insulin) inject five units subcutaneously before meals for DM. The medication was to be held for blood sugar (BS) less than 120. Review of Resident #48's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated January 2024, revealed on 01/01/24 at 11:00 A.M. Resident #48's BS reading was 117 and five units of insulin lispro was administered, on 01/03/24 at 4:00 P.M. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to maintain infection control, related to personal protective equipment (PPE) use, proper hand hygiene, and glove use. This affected two residents (Resident #67 and Resident #220) with the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #220 revealed an admission date of 03/18/22 and the diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, Parkinson disease, insomnia, muscle weakness, ataxic gait, malaise, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #220 was alert and oriented, but confused, and her lungs were clear with a regular respiratory rate. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 indicating impaired cognition and the resident required extensive two staff assistance for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor Resident #22, Resident #38, Resident #59, Resident #80, and Resident #102's preferences in getting in and out of bed. This affected five (Resident #22, Resident #38, Resident #59, Resident #80, and Resident #102's ) of five residents reviewed for choices. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 10/30/21. Diagnoses for Resident #59 included spondylosis, cervical region, spinal stenosis, cervical region, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neuralgia and neuritis, major depressive disorder and dependence on wheelchair. Review of the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #59 was noted to require extensive assistance of two staff for transfers. Review of the plan of care dated 01/31/22, revealed Resident #59 required total assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Interventions included to assist with bathing, grooming and incontinence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #52 and Resident #59 received sufficient bathing assistance, Resident #3 and Resident #59 received assistance with nail care, Resident #71 received assistance with dressing, Resident #119 received assistance with hair washing, and Resident #21 received assistance with personal hygiene. This affected six residents (Resident #3, Resident #21, Resident #52, Resident #53, Resident #59, and Resident #118) of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) care. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 10/30/21. Diagnoses for Resident #59 included spondylosis, cervical region, spinal stenosis, cervical region, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neuralgia and neuritis, major depressive disorder and dependence on wheelchair. Review of the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #59 to have mildly impaired cognition. Resident #59…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, review of activity calendar, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities based on the resident preferences and comprehensive assessments. This affected six residents (Resident #12, Resident #22, Resident #66, Resident #80, Resident #102, and Resident #118) of seven residents reviewed for activities. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 08/27/21. Medical diagnoses included traumatic brain dysfunction. Review of Resident #66's care plan dated 08/29/21, revealed the resident was unable to to pursue her interests due to her physical condition. The resident was willing to interact with others and participate in activities as her condition allowed. The following interests were important to the resident: arts and crafts, bingo, computer activities, gardening, music, religious activities, and spending time outside. Interventions were to offer activity program directed toward specific interests and needs of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #25 and #44's oxygen tubing was dated or changed per physician orders, failed to ensure Resident #44's respiratory medications were available and able to be administered per physician orders, and failed to ensure a Ambu breathing bag was placed in Resident #66's room. This affected two residents (Resident #25 and Resident #44) out of two residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, and one Resident (Resident #66) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 11/11/21 and the diagnoses of dementia with lewy bodies, need for assistance with personal care, morbid obesity, depression, and acute and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, observation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to food was properly stored. This had the potential to affect 85 residents who received meals from the kitchen, as 31 residents in the facility received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Observation on 03/21/22 at 7:44 A.M. revealed an opened, unsealed, undated, frozen bag of [NAME] dean sausage links. Interview at this time with Diet Technician #302 confirmed the observation. Observation on 03/21/22 at 7:49 A.M. of the walk-in refrigerator revealed an open and unsealed bag containing heads of lettuce. Observation on 03/21/22 at 7:52 A.M. of the free-standing refrigerator revealed an open and undated gallon of orange pineapple drink and unlabeled and undated yellow liquid in pitcher. Observation on 03/21/22 at 7:53 A.M. of the other side of the free-standing refrigerator revealed opened and undated cottage cheese and chicken salad. Interview on 03/21/22 at 7:54 A.M. with Dietary Manager #290…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of infection control logs, review of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) information, review of a HealthDay News Study, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate justification for the use of antibiotics as a treatment measure for COVID-19. This affected 13 residents (#11, #13, #15, #24, #33, #34, #43, #59, #224, #225, #226, #227, and #228) out of 31 residents who tested positive for COVID-19 from December 2021 through February 2022. Findings include: Review of the infection control logs and medical record reviews from December 2021 through February 2022 revealed 13 residents (#11, #13, #15, #24, #33, #34, #43, #59, #224, #225, #226, #227, and #228) in December 2021 and January 2022 who tested positive for COVID-19 were prescribed Azithromax/Azithromycin. Interview on 03/29/22 at 10:40 A.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) and the Infection Preventionist/Registered Nurse #293 revealed their COVID-19 positive protocol included Zinc, Vitamin C, Pepcid, an antibiotic, and a steroid. They stated their normal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, resident interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #21 and Resident #119's chosen advanced directives in the residents' medical records. This affected two residents (Resident #21 and Resident #119) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #119 revealed an admission date of 08/24/20. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), pressure ulcer, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), stable burst fracture of the fourth lumbar vertebra, type two diabetes mellitus (DM2), chronic kidney disease, seizures, atrial flutter, noncompliance with other medical treatment and regimen, disorder of kidney and ureter, chronic pain, hyperlipidemia, hypertension (HTN), and other symptoms and signs concerning food and fluid intake. Review of Resident #119's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/07/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-30 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, resident interview, observation, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assist Resident #57 with her communication needs due to her hearing impairment. This affected one resident (#57) of three resident reviewed for communication/sensory needs. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 06/24/21. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), heart failure, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia without behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/07/21, revealed the resident had moderate difficulty with the use of a hearing aid or other hearing appliance. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident was sometimes understood and sometimes understood verbal communication. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/07/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure range of motion was provided for Resident #118 who had impairment to her upper extremities, and failed to ensure Resident #3's splint devices were in place as ordered. This affected two residents (Resident #3 and Resident #118) out of seven reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #118 revealed an admission date of 11/07/19. Medical diagnoses included a traumatic spinal cord dysfunction. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #118 developed impairment in her upper extremities for the first time since admission into the facility. Review of MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #118 was rarely or never understood. Functional status was total dependence for bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toilet use. She had impairment to her upper extremities. Review of Resident #118's restorative passive range of motion (PROM) nursing program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the failed to ensure Resident #29's urinary tract infection (UTI) was identified and treated promptly. This affected of one resident (Resident #29) of two residents reviewed for UTI's. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #29 included major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, obesity, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the physician progress note dated 11/16/21 revealed Resident #29 was seen by a nurse practitioner (NP) for altered mental status and multiple recent falls. Labs, including basic metabolic panel (BMP), complete blood count (CBC), arterial blood gases (ABG), and a urine analysis culture and sensitivity (UA C&S) were ordered for Resident #29. A UA C&S is a urine culture to check for UTI. Review of the lab results dated 11/17/21 revealed no concerns. However, the UA C&S was not available in the medical record. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-30 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #80's peripherally inserted central (PICC) line dressing was changed before it was charted as completed in the Treatment Adminstration Record (TAR). This affected of one resident (Resident #80) one reviewed for PICC line dressings. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 11/04/20. Medical diagnoses included traumatic brain dysfunction. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #80 was moderately impaired. His functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, independent for eating, total dependence for toileting, and transfers did not occur on this assessment. He was coded for oxygen, suctioning, tracheostomy, and ventilator treatment. Review of physician orders dated 03/21/22 revealed to change the PICC line dressing every seven days. Review of Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 03/21/22 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-30 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to monitor for psychotropic side effects and provide planned behavioral health interventions for Residents #29. This affected one resident (Resident #29) of two residents reviewed for mood and behavior. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #29 included major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #29 to have intact cognition and did not note any concerns with mood or behaviors. a. Review of the plan of care dated 01/05/22 revealed Resident #29 to be at risk for adverse effects related to psychoactive medication use for depression and anxiety. Interventions include to assess for adverse effects including sedation and non-drug approaches to deal with problem behaviors report changes in behavior or mood.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, resident interview, observation, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication was secured at all times. This had the potential to affect two residents (Resident #23 and Resident #58) of two residents reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 07/26/17. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, type II diabetes mellitus (DM2), hyperlipidemia, hypertension (HTN), generalized anxiety disorder, and unspecified psychosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/07/21, revealed Resident #23 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment). His behaviors included other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others. The resident was independent with all activities of daily living (ADL's) except required supervision and set up for bed mobility and eating. He did not require any mobility devices. He was always continent of bowel and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-30 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were drawn for Resident #76 and Resident #118. This affected two residents (Resident #76 and Resident #118) out of six residents reviewed for labs. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 01/29/19. Medical diagnoses included debility and cardiorespiratory conditions. Review of Resident #76's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #76's physician orders dated 02/27/22 revealed Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Complete Blood Count (CBC), and Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) labs were to be collected on the first Wednesday of the month. Review of standing order daily log dated 03/02/22 revealed Resident #76's BMP and CBC labs were drawn on 03/02/22. The was no evidence the TSH lab was drawn and no evidence the results of CBC and BMP lab draws were reported. Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/28/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 4.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLLERAN, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2019 |
| KRYSTOWSKI, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2018 |
| FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2019 |
| FATICA, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/26/2018 |
| CHU, VINCENT | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365195. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.