Sycamore Run Nursing And Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 34.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 87.4 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency after the facility was made aware of the allegation. This affected one resident, (Resident #99), reviewed for abuse reporting. The facility census was 96. Findings include:Review of Resident #99's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 05/26/26. Diagnoses included multiple fractures of ribs, left side, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing; unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance; alcohol abuse; Type II Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic neuropathy; atrial fibrillation; muscle weakness; difficulty walking; cognitive communication deficit; need for assistance with personal care; depression; history of falling; dysphagia; and hypertension. Review of the complaint information revealed a complaint was filed which indicated Resident #99 was abused by facility staff. The complaint…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and medication manufacturer guideline review the facility failed to provide respiratory care following inhaled respiratory medication as administered. This deficient practice affected two residents (Resident #3 and #11) out of three residents reviewed for respiratory medication administration. The facility census was 90. 1.Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed admission date 02/27/26 with diagnoses including but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), emphysema, and heart disease.Review of Resident #11's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/04/26 for respiratory medication Ellipta 62.5 micrograms (MCG) per actuation Aerosol Powder, breath activated 1 puff inhale orally one time a day related to Emphysema, Rinse mouth with water after using.Review of Resident #11's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11had intact cognition with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored securely. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #42) out of 10 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 90.Findings Include:Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed admission date 04/14/26 with diagnoses including but not limited to type two Diabetes, vascular dementia, and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF).Review of Resident #42's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of four out of possible 15 and required assistance from staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks.Review of Resident #42's physician orders revealed an order for an insulin order Humalog Kwik-Pen 100 units per milliliter (ML) inject subcutaneously with meals related to type two Diabetes. Update physician or Nurse Practitioner for Blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to follow infection control procedures related to medication administration This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #42) of 10 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 90. Findings include:Findings Include:Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed admission date 04/14/26 with diagnoses including but not limited to type two Diabetes, vascular dementia, and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF).Review of Resident #42's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of four out of possible 15 and required assistance from staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks.Review of Resident #42's physician orders revealed an order for an insulin order Humalog Kwik-Pen 100 units per milliliter (ML) inject subcutaneously with meals related to type two Diabetes. Update MD/NP…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEYBased on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for alterations in skin integrity upon admission. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #89) out of two residents reviewed for alterations in skin integrity. The facility census was 88.Findings include: Review of Resident #89 ' s medical record revealed an admission dated 12/23/25 and a discharge date [DATE] against medical advice (AMA) with diagnoses including but not limited to urinary tract infection (UTI), spina bifida, asthma, dysphagia, and dependence on wheelchair for mobility.Review of Resident #89 ' s physician orders revealed an order dated 12/23/25 to encourage/assist to turn and reposition as tolerated every shift, a treatment order dated 12/23/25 for Mupirocin External Ointment 2% apply to chronic wounds topically every shift for chronic wounds and an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity when an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was not covered. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #48) of two reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 89. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 03/12/18 with diagnoses including but not limited to unspecified injury at unspecified level of the cervical spinal cord, type two diabetes mellitus, paraplegia and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the physician order dated 10/14/24 for Resident #48 revealed 16 French foley catheter with 10 cubic centimeter (cc) balloon to continuous drainage due to neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder; Catheter care every shift; Change foley catheter as needed for signs and symptoms of infection, obstruction, system compromise dated 09/18/24. Review of the plan of care for Resident #48 dated 11/13/24 revealed an alteration in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and review of the facility Management of Personal Funds form revealed the facility failed to have written authorization to manage Resident #54's funds. This affected one (Resident #54) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #54 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, peripheral vascular disease, type II diabetes, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Management of Personal Funds form dated 10/15/24 revealed the form was marked that Resident #54 did not wish to open a personal funds account and he would manage his own funds or have a person or entity other than the facility manage his money while at the facility. Resident #54 agreed to hold the facility harmless for any loss that occurred to their personal money. Lastly, the form was signed by Resident #54. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented. This affected two (Resident #10 and Resident #34) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and pre-diabetes. Review of the plan of care dated 08/14/23 revealed Resident #34 is at risk for falls. Interventions included: Alarming floor mat beside the bed, taped down with brightly colored tape and a Motion Sensor to the floor while the resident is in the room to alert staff to attempts of unassisted ambulation and transfers. Check function and placement every shift. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was not intact. She used a walker for ambulation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for Resident #47. This affected one resident (#47) of 16 reviewed. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 02/25/21. Diagnoses included paralytic syndrome following cerebral infarction bilateral, type two diabetes mellitus, respiratory disorders, obstructive sleep apnea, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, cognitive social or emotional deficit following cerebral infarction, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, chronic kidney disease stage three, major depressive disorder, chronic pain syndrome, gout, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, allergic rhinitis, heart disease, fibromyalgia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, polyneuropathy, cluster headache syndrome, insomnia, anxiety disorder, and epididymitis. The comprehensive list of diagnoses in the electronic medical record for Resident #47 did not include psychosis or any other severe mental health diagnoses. Review of the psychiatry notes dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of self-reported incident (SRI), review of facility investigation, review of witness statements, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the policy, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse to the Ohio Department of Health and report the allegation to the local Police Department. This affected one (#93) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Review of the SRI dated 03/14/24 at 1:12 P.M., for the category of sexual abuse, revealed on 03/14/24 at 1:30 A.M., a female resident, (Resident #93) reported that a male resident (Resident #70) who has dementia was in her bed. Staff witnessed Resident (#70) walking in the hallway fully clothed at the time of the allegation. Resident (#93) was noted to be lying in bed fully clothed and denied skin to skin contact. Upon further questioning, the female resident (#93) stated she thought he (Resident #70) was wanting to have sex with her. Immediately the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH