Veranda Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 86.4 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-10-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews with staff, residents, and a family member, facility document review, and review of the Facility Assessment, the facility failed to ensure designated and consistent staffing was provided on one (500-Hall) of five total halls in the facility to ensure sufficient staff to provide needed care and services to the 13 residents that resided on the 500-Hall. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious injury, harm, impairment and/or death, when observations during the survey on 10/07/24 and 10/08/24 revealed times where the residents were left unattended on the 500-Hall with no staff members in the area. Staff reported there was no process in place to coordinate supervision, monitoring, or assistance for the residents on the 500-Hall. In addition, the call system on the 500-Hall only illuminated on the annunciator panel located on that hall; therefore, in the event of an emergent need, when no staff were present on the 500-Hall, the residents were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on medical record review, review of the hospital record, review of the facility investigation, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance while providing a resident incontinence care resulting in an avoidable fall. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #13 on 07/26/25 when staff rolled the resident away from them during care, the resident began to shake the side rail, the side rail gave way during care and the resident fell from the bed onto the floor. Resident #13 was subsequently transferred to the hospital for treatment for a head laceration requiring sutures. This affected one (#13) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 89.Findings Included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, schizoaffective disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-20 · tag F0572 — widespread
  Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to review Resident Rights with the residents on an ongoing basis both in writing and orally. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 82. Review of Resident Council Minutes for the past twelve months (December 2024 through December 2025) revealed a discussion of resident rights was not on the agenda nor discussed at monthly meetings.Interview on 01/21/26 at 2:08 P.M., Resident #47 stated he had recently received a copy of the Resident Rights document from the local Ombudsman who had come to their January resident council meeting. After reading the document, he began sharing it with other residents including the Resident Council President (Resident #16). Resident #47 stated he had not seen the Resident Rights information before. Interview on 01/21/26 at 2:17 P.M., Resident #16 stated she had not read the Resident Rights document until Resident #47 had brought it to her recently. Interviews on 01/26/26 at 2:00 P.M. to 3:45 P.M., Resident #20, #26 #41, and #70 stated they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect 80 out of 82 residents as the facility identified two Residents (#87 and #09) with a diet order of nothing by mouth. The facility census was 82. Observation of the kitchen's dry storage room on 01/12/26 at 8:50 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #235, revealed a bag of baking cocoa with an open date of 07/12/25 and no discard date. Further observation revealed an open bag of egg noodles and penne noodles without a date. Interview with DS #235 at the same time, verified that the baking cocoa should have had a discard date for six months after opening and that both bags off pasta did not have an open date or a discard date.Continued observation of the kitchen on 01/12/26 at 8:54 A.M. with DS #235 revealed a pumpkin pie without a date or name being stored in the refrigerator in the main dining room. Interview with DS #235 at the same time, stated the refrigerator is for food that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to include residents and families for care planning and care conferences. This affected three Residents (#54, #47, and #16) out of four residents reviewed for care planning and care conferences. Facility census was 82. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed the resident was admitted to facility on 05/13/22. Diagnosis included cerebral infarction, chronic pain, stenosis of bilateral carotid arteries, depression, anxiety, aphasia following cerebral infarction, diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and hyperlipidemia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #54 dated 12/15/25 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition with moderate depression. Interview with Resident #54 on 01/13/26 at 9:31 A.M. revealed he could not remember ever having a care conference with the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to discuss care concerns or his care plan.Interview on 01/13/26 at 4:10 P.M., Resident #54's Guardian…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure trash cans in the kitchen were properly covered. This had the potential to affect 80 out of 82 residents as the facility identified two Residents (#87 and #09) with a diet order of nothing by mouth. The facility census was 82. Observation of the kitchen on 01/12/2026 at 8:39 A.M. Dietary Supervisor (DS) #235 revealed a trash can in the food prep area and in the dish washing area that did not have a lid. Interview with DS #235 at the same time, verified the trash cans were not covered. DS #235 attempted to cover both trash cans but was only able to locate one lid. Interview on 01/14/2026 at 11:27 A.M., Dietician #351 verified all trash cans should be covered when they are not in active use.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of Resident Council Minutes, resident interviews, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide responses to resident's expressed concerns. This had the potential to affect seven of seven that regularly attend Resident Council meetings. The census was 89. Findings included: Review of the Resident Council Meeting minutes dated March 2024, revealed the section titled Follow-up from last meeting / Action Taken / Current status: was blank. The minutes revealed the section titled New Questions / Comments: indicated the residents had concerns with nursing, dietary, housekeeping, laundry, and activities. Review of the Resident Council Meeting minutes dated April 2024, revealed the section titled Follow-up from last meeting / Action Taken / Current status: included Follow up from March reviewed [with] no further follow up needed. The minutes revealed the section titled New Questions / Comments: indicated the residents had concerns with nursing, dietary, housekeeping, laundry, and activities. Review of the Resident Council Meeting minutes dated May 2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-12 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their personal funds after hours and on weekends. This affected two (#3 and #31) of three residents reviewed for personal funds with the potential to affect 70 residents who had a personal funds account. The facility census was 89. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/16/14. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/09/24, revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Interview on 10/09/24 at 8:52 A.M.,with Resident #3 stated the resident was only able to access their personal funds on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays, until 3 P.M Resident #3 stated the resident had been informed if the Business Office Manager (BOM) was not working, they were unable to get any funds from the facility. Resident #3 stated the resident had asked the Social Worker,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, facility document review, staff interviews, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure diuretic medication was accurately coded on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected one (#32) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 89. Findings included: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/07/12 and most recently admitted the resident on 08/20/21. Diagnoses for Resident #32 included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, presence of cardiac pacemaker, and hypertension. Review of Resident #32's care plan included a focus area, initiated 08/16/12, indicated the resident was at nutritional risk due to factors that included routine diuretic therapy. Review of Resident #32's Medication Administration Record (MAR), for June 2024, revealed the transcription of an order,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were maintained in a safe and secure manner. This affected one (#61) of two sampled residents reviewed for accidents. This faciliy census was 89. Findings included: Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/16/23. Diagnoses for Resident #61 included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchopneumonia, anxiety, polyneuropathy, insomnia, malignant neoplasm of the lung, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperlipidemia, essential hypertension (HTN), heart failure, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and interstitial pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/20/24, revealed Resident #61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #61 received antianxiety, hypnotic, and hypoglycemic medications during the assessment period. Review of Resident #61's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-12 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
  Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure urostomy (an abdominal wall opening to allow urine to drain from the body) tubing was secured. This affected one (#53) of three residents reviewed for catheter care. The faciliy census was 89. Findings included: Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/14/19 and most recently admitted the resident on 08/23/23. Diagnoses for Resident #53 included: neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, urinary retention, and stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacral region. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 07/09/2024, revealed Resident #53 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. According to the MDS, the resident had an ostomy, and their urinary continence was not rated, because the resident had a catheter, urinary ostomy, or no urinary output during the seven-day look-back period. Review of Resident #53's care plan included a focus area initiated on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to clean oxygen concentrators in accordance with physician's orders and the facility's policy for two (Resident #31 and Resident #61) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 89. Findings included: 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #31 on 07/23/12. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/10/24, revealed Resident #31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #31 experienced shortness of breath when lying flat and had not used oxygen therapy during the assessment look-back period. Resident #31's care plan, included a focus area initiated 10/07/23, that indicated the resident had respiratory deficiencies or abnormalities of pulmonary function related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$44,730 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,015 — penalty dated 2025-11-18
• $30,715 — penalty dated 2024-10-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $668K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH