Timberland Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 60.7 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, individualized and effective nutrition/hydration plan to prevent weight loss and dehydration for Resident #12. This affected one resident (#12) of three residents reviewed for significant weight loss. The census was 65. Actual harm occurred on 10/01/25 when Resident #12, who had moderate cognitive impairment, was at moderate risk for malnutrition, required cues and assist with eating, and had a care-planned intervention to monitor and provide hydration as prescribed, was assessed to weigh 189.4 pounds representing a 17.3 pound or 8.3 percent (%) severe weight loss in two weeks. The resident was transferred to the hospital (on 10/01/25) and admitted with a change in mental status secondary to dehydration with a five-day hospital stay requiring intravenous fluids. Prior to the hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure ongoing weight monitoring was completed and failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored. This affected nine residents (#12, #22, #25, #31, #33, #34, #40, #51, and #53). This had the potential to affected nine other residents residing on the memory care care who were independently mobile and had cognitive impairments. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Observation on 01/20/26 at 10:12 A.M. revealed a medication cart unlocked parked on the west hall. On top of the medication cart were eight medication cups with medications (pills) in each individual cup. There were letters written on each cup. There were no staff near or monitoring the medications on top of the unlocked medication cart. Observation on 01/20/26 at 10:15 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #300 approached the medication cart after exiting a resident room (Resident #1's room). LPN #300 confirmed she left the medication cart unlocked with eight medication cups…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents who were dependent on staff for toileting hygiene received timely assistance with incontinence care. This affected two (Residents #13 and #42) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 62.Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 10/03/25. Diagnoses included unspecified fracture of the lower end of the right femur, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was cognitively intact. Resident #42 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene.Review of the care plan dated 11/14/25 revealed Resident #42 had an alteration in elimination, and was completely incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interventions included to provide incontinence care as needed. Interview on 01/20/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #37's care planned interventions were implemented and skin impairments were identified and treated timely. This affected one (Resident's #37) of four residents reviewed for skin integrity. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/03/25 and diagnoses included non-infective gastroenteritis and colitis and cerebral palsy.Review of Resident #37's admission Skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had a stage I pressure ulcer (skin is intact but shows damage from prolonged pressure, appearing as a persistent red, reddish-blue, or purplish area that doesn't turn white (blanch) when pressed), the skin was intact, non-blanchable, and there was erythema (reddening of the skin caused by inflammation).Review of Resident #37's physician orders revealed on 10/04/25, an order to apply house moisture barrier…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #13's care planned interventions were implemented and failed to ensure Resident #13 had a comprehensive fall evaluation completed timely. This affected one (Resident #13) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/04/25. Diagnoses included sepsis, obesity, and type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact. Resident #13 had no impairment of the upper and lower extremities and required substantial to maximal assistance for bathing and was dependent for toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #13 required substantial to maximal assistance for the ability to come to a standing position from sitting in a chair, wheelchair or on the side of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the residents received timely and appropriate incontinence care. This affected one (Resident's #31) of four residents reviewed for skin integrity. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 06/10/25 and a re-entry date of 09/03/25. Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus without complications, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #31 required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, and personal hygiene and was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel.Review of Resident #31's care plan dated 09/14/25 revealed Resident #31 had an alteration in elimination and was frequently…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, pharmacy interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #13's physician orders were followed and her medication was available for administration. This affected one (Resident #13) of five reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/04/25. Diagnoses included obesity - class III and type two diabetes mellitus (DM) with diabetic neuropathy. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact and did not reject care during the seven-day assessment look-back period.Review of Resident #13's physician orders dated 11/05/25 revealed Zepbound subcutaneous solution 2.5 milligrams (mg) per 0.5 milliliter (ml), inject one pen needle subcutaneously one time a day every Tuesday for DM. Last week of injection, please notify the Nurse Practitioner (NP).The care plan dated 11/14/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of a manufacturer insert, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). Three errors were observed in 27 opportunities resulting in a 11.1% error rate. This affected three (Resident #14, #17 and #31) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 62. Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 09/25/20. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia.Review of the care plan dated 10/06/20 revealed Resident #14 was at risk for hypo/hyperglycemia episodes. Interventions included insulin as ordered.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact and had diabetes mellitus.Review of the physician order for Resident #14 revealed an order with a start date 09/01/22 for Novolog FlexPen solution pen injector 100 units per milliliter (ml),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interviews, pharmacist interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #101 was free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #101) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 67. Findings include:Review of Resident #101's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/08/25. Diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease without dyskinesia and anxiety. Resident #101 was discharged from the facility on 10/12/25.Review of Resident #101's admission assessment and Baseline Care Plan dated 10/08/25 included Resident #101 was confused and disoriented and unaware of safety needs. Resident #101 was anxious and received antianxiety medication. Review of Resident #101's physician orders dated 10/08/25 revealed alprazolam (Xanax) oral tablet 0.25 milligrams (mg), give one table by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety.Review of Resident #101's Medication Administration Record dated 10/08/25, 10/09/25, 10/10/25, 10/11/25 and 10/12/25 did not reveal alprazolam 0.25 mg,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care was provided for #68's wound. This finding affected one resident (Residents #68) of four residents reviewed for wounds.Findings include:Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia, chronic respiratory failure, osteomyelitis and major depressive disorder.Review of Resident #68's Skin Integrity Care Plan revealed an intervention dated 12/17/23 to assess pain and provide treatments per the physician's orders.Review of Resident #68's Quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition.Review of Resident #68's Pressure Skin Grid dated 10/18/25 revealed a vascular rear left calf wound first identified 10/18/25 which measured 3 cm length by 2 cm width by 0.3 cm depth with small serosanguineous drainage. There was no evidence treatment for the wound was put in place immediately. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained and wound care provided for Resident #28's pressure ulcer wounds. This finding affected one resident (Residents #28) of four residents reviewed for wounds.Findings include:Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility and cerebral palsy.Review of Resident #28's Alteration in Skin Integrity Care plans dated 10/10/25 revealed to assess for pain and provide treatments per the physician's order. Review of Resident #28's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #28's Wound #1 Pressure Skin Grid form dated 10/06/25 revealed the resident had a stage one sacrum pressure wound first identified 10/02/25 (earliest stage of skin damage caused by pressure with intact, non-blanchable erythema and/or pain) which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-21 for 84 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH