Park Health Center
100 Pine Avenue, St Clairsville, OH 43950 · For profit - Corporation · 87 certified beds · (740) 695-4925 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $17,345 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-22)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.8% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 63.5% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.8% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.4% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.7% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.1% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.4% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.1% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.3% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.62 | 1.73 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.21 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.9%CMS range 40.3–57.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.3–13.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 25.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 10.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 5.6–13.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 80.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.07 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed record review, hospital documentation review, review of a facility investigation, review of video footage, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to timely and comprehensively assess, notify a physician, and provide timely and necessary care and services to Resident #22 after she complained of hip pain as a result of a dislocated right hip. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm beginning on 07/21/25 at 1:10 A.M. when Resident #22 voiced complaints of pain and staff continued to provide personal care, assisting the resident into her bathroom and transferred the resident to bed without first assessing the resident. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #113 administered a dose of as needed narcotic pain medication but failed to comprehensively assess the resident related to the pain. On 07/21/25 at 2:01 A.M. review of video footage revealed staff entered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, policy review, facility self-investigation report review, review of police reports, resident observation, and interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an allegation of staff to resident sexual abuse. In addition, the facility failed to protect residents after an allegation of staff to resident sexual abuse when they permitted a specified perpetrator to continue to work and provide care to residents. This affected one resident (#171) of three residents reviewed for abuse, and eight residents (#102, #111, #121, #122, #124, #134, #142, and #143) who were provided care by a specified perpetrator who was the perpetrator identified in a staff to resident sexual abuse allegation and allowed to work. The facility census was 84.Findings include:Review of the medical record for the Resident #171 revealed an admission date of 02/17/24. Diagnoses included stroke, constipation, peripheral vascular disease, oxygen dependence, depression, hard of hearing, visual deficits, unspecified dementia without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, facility policy review, facility investigation file review, police report review, resident observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident sexual abuse. This affected one resident (#171) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 84. Findings include:Review of the medical record for the Resident #171 revealed an admission date of 02/17/24. Diagnoses included stroke, constipation, peripheral vascular disease, oxygen dependence, depression, hard of hearing, visual deficits, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, lung disease, arthritis, and high blood pressure.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/03/26, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of 6/15. Further review revealed Resident #171 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. Review of the behavior and mood MDS assessments revealed no behaviors since prior annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of the social services job description, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide medically related social services for a resident who had a change in her psychosocial status. This affected one resident (#171) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #171 revealed an admission date of 02/17/24. Diagnoses included stroke, constipation, peripheral vascular disease, oxygen dependence, depression, hard of hearing, visual deficits, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, lung disease, arthritis, and high blood pressure.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/03/26, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of 6/15. Further review revealed Resident #171 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. Review of the behavior and mood MDS assessments revealed no behaviors since prior annual assessment completed in November of 2025 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records, review of facility investigations, review of police reports, facility policy reviews, observations, and interviews with residents and staff the facility failed to provide effective administration when the facility's Administrator knowingly failed to report an allegation of staff to resident sexual abuse of Resident #171 and the Administrator knowingly provided false information to investigating police officers. This affected one resident (#171) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 84. Findings include:Review of the medical record for the Resident #171 revealed an admission date of 02/17/24. Diagnoses included stroke, constipation, peripheral vascular disease, oxygen dependence, depression, hard of hearing, visual deficits, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, lung disease, arthritis, and high blood pressure.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/03/26, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of 6/15. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete medical record. This affected one resident (#171) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 84. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #171 revealed an admission date of 02/17/24. Diagnoses included stroke, constipation, peripheral vascular disease, oxygen dependence, depression, hard of hearing, visual deficits, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, lung disease, arthritis, and high blood pressure.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/03/26, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of 6/15. Further review revealed Resident #171 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. Review of the behavior and mood MDS assessments revealed no behaviors since prior annual assessment completed in November of 20256 and severe depression present with no change since prior assessment. Review of the plan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, review of video footage, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity. This affected one resident (#22) of four residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 86.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #22 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified intracapsular fracture of right femur, muscle wasting and atrophy, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had impaired cognition, no behaviors, was dependent on staff for transfers, and had occasional pain of five.Review of an Authorization for Electronic Monitoring in Resident Room form dated 05/12/25 revealed Resident #22's power of attorney installed a fixed position video camera with recording in her room.Review of a video provided by Resident #22's family dated 07/04/25 at 10:51 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #162 exiting Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, review of video footage, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided the opportunity for urination in the bathroom versus being told to urinate in her incontinence brief. This affected one resident (#22) of four residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 86.Findings include:Closed record review revealed Resident #22 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified intracapsular fracture of right femur, muscle wasting and atrophy, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had impaired cognition, no behaviors, required moderate assistance for transfers, and was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel.Review of a care plan dated 04/28/25 revealed Resident #22 had an alteration in elimination related to hip fracture and revision, back pain, dementia, stroke, diabetes, overall decline in mobility, falls, and bowel and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, and prepared under sanitary conditions. This affected all the resident's in the facility except Residents #8, #63, #133, #183, #185 and #189 who do not receive nutrition from the kitchen. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Initial tour of the kitchen 03/24/25 at 08:10 A.M. with [NAME] #18 revealed: - The walk in freezer had a bag of mixed vegetables and Charbroil burgers that had been entered and not resealed exposing the contents to the freezing air. - The walk in refrigerator had 58 individual cartons of [NAME] whole milk with a sell by date of 03/12/25. - There was leftover chili in the walk in refrigerator not dated. - The walk in refrigerator had a five pound carton of [NAME] Choice sour cream that expired 03/17/25. - The scoop was on the lid of a thickener container not contained in a case or bag. - There was dust on all four pipes over the stove cooktop on the ansel system. - The shelf over the cooktop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were accurate. This affected one resident (#2) of 24 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/25/25 with diagnoses including epilepsy, atherosclerotic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, angina, Parkinson's disease, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the electronic medical record revealed on admission, the resident had Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA) orders (this status means that while full medical care is provided before a cardiac or respiratory arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and advanced life support measures are not initiated upon arrest. Instead the focus shifts to comfort measures). On 03/03/25 the physician orders included an order for the code status to be changed to a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) (only comfort measures will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure plans of care were updated to reflect the residents' preferences and medical needs. This affected two Residents (#26 and #133) of 22 residents reviewed. The census was 85 Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date 06/29/23 and readmission date of 05/02/24 with diagnoses including morbid severe obesity. chronic atrial fibrillation, dependence on renal dialysis, type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, chronic peripheral insufficiency, acquired absence of right great toe and other right toes. osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, gastro esophageal reflux disease. lymphedema, anemia, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, absence of other left toes, chronic kidney disease Stage 4 (severe), angina pectoris, hypoxemia, glaucoma and hypertension. Review of the resident's dialysis plan of care initiated 01/18/24 revealed the care plan not individualized and did not identify the resident having a fistula (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Review of Resident #70 revealed a 07/29/25 admission with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, psychotic disorder with delusions, vitamin D deficiency, type 2 diabetes, and anxiety disorder. The admission shower preference sheet dated 07/29/24 indicated a preference for three to four showers a week. Review of the 01/27/25 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making, had hallucinations, delusions, rejection of care, physical and verbal behaviors, He had upper and lower functional impairment on both sides and dependent for bathing. Interview 03/24/25 at 11:47 A.M. with Resident #70's wife revealed the facility was not brushing his teeth, showering and completing dressing changes. He was supposed to be getting showers three times a week and he sometimes doesn't get two a week. They have been better since she brought it to their attention but still doesn't get enough. Review of the shower schedule revealed the resident was a Sunday, Wednesday, and Friday dayshift shower. Review of the Certified Nurse Aide TASK in the electronic record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an anticoagulant (Eliquis) medication was administered per orders after the resident received a new diagnoses of pulmonary embolism (blockage of the main artery to the lung or one of its branches). This affected one (Resident #76) of six reviewed for unnecessary medication review. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 03/18/25 pulmonary embolism was added to the diagnosis list. Review of Resident #76's progress note dated 03/16/25 revealed the nurse at the emergency room reported the resident was being admitted for a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Review of Resident #76's hospital record dated 03/16/25 revealed the cardiologist was called due to the resident having bilateral pulmonary embolism and potential right heart strain for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of operational manual, review of policy, review of statement, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure low air loss mattress was functioning properly. This affected one (Resident #240) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #240 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pressure ulcers, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), metabolic encephalopathy, muscle weakness, anemia, and spondylolisthesis of lumbar region. Review of Resident #240's five-day Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was at risk for pressure and currently had two stage I pressure ulcers (skin intact with non-blanchable erythema) . The resident was substantial/maximal assist with rolling left to right, sit to lying and lying to sitting. Review of Resident #240's pressure ulcer assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was at high risk for pressure due to PVD and currently had pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care was appropriate for a resident receiving dialysis services. This affected one (Resident #26) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: Review of Resident #26 revealed a 06/29/23 admission and readmission [DATE] with diagnoses including morbid severe obesity. chronic atrial fibrillation, dependence on renal dialysis, type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, chronic peripheral insufficiency, acquired absence of right great toe and other right toes. osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, gastro esophageal reflux disease. lymphedema, anemia, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, absence of other left toes, chronic kidney disease Stage 4 (severe), angina pectoris, hypoxemia, glaucoma and hypertension. Review of the resident's dialysis plan of care initiated 01/18/24 revealed the care plan was generic and did not identify the resident having a fistula. Review of the physician orders included 02/11/25 1200 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction dietary 550…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the pharmacy failed to ensure medication were available timely for administration. This affected one (Resident #64) of three observed for medication administration, one (Resident #236) of two reviewed for urinary tract infections, and one (Resident #238) of one reviewed for respiratory infection. Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #64's current orders revealed Ozempic subcutaneous solution pen-injector two milligrams (mg)/1.5 milliliters (ml) subcutaneously one time a day every Wednesday for diabetes. Observation on 03/26/25 at 7:38 A.M., of Resident #64 medication administration with Registered Nurse (RN) #92 revealed the resident Ozempic was not available to administer. The RN confirmed the Ozempic was only administered once a week on Wednesday and the medication should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medication were administered per parameters. This affected one (Resident #76) of six reviewed for unnecessary medication review. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 03/18/25 pulmonary embolism was added to the diagnosis list. Review of Resident #76's cardiac plan of care dated 11/19/24 revealed to administer medication as ordered. Review of Resident #76's orders dated 03/2025 revealed the resident was ordered Midodrine 10 milligrams (mg) three times daily (rise, lunch, and bedtime) for hypotension. If the systolic greater than 110 do not give. Review of Resident #76's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 03/2025 revealed nurse had administered Midodrine on 03/02/25 at lunch and bedtime when the resident blood pressure was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the Center for Disease Control (CDC), review of infection control log, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure resident's meet criteria for antibiotics treatment. This affected one (Resident #238) of one reviewed for respiratory infection. Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #238 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and overactive bladder. Review of Resident #238's respiratory care plan dated 03/07/25 revealed diagnostic studies as ordered. Review of Resident #238's progress note dated 03/07/25 revealed the resident stated she had been coughing since yesterday, with worsening today and new symptom of slight dizziness. New order had been obtained for cough syrup and flu swab. Review of Resident #238's laboratory testing dated 03/08/25 revealed Resident #238 tested positive for Influenza A. Review of Resident #238's progress note dated 03/08/25 revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, record review, review of equipment manufacturer guidelines, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided adequate and proper assistance, following manufacturer's guidelines to reposition in a geriatric (geri) chair to prevent an accident with injury. This affected one resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility identified seven additional residents (Resident #11, #13, #15, #17, #18, #20, and #21) who utilized reclining assistive devices for mobility. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and osteoarthritis. Review of the care plan with an initiation date of 07/14/22, revealed Resident #1 required (staff) assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to store food properly, check temperatures on cold items prior to serving them, and ensure the oven was clean. This had the potential to affect 72 of 72 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified four residents, Resident #5, #29, #63, and #68 who received nothing by mouth and did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 76. Findings included: 1. Observation on 10/16/23 at 8:05 A.M. of the facility walk-in refrigerator revealed the following: One large foil pan of cubed potatoes not labeled or dated. A prepared side salad not dated. A two and one half pound bag of salad which had been opened, not dated when opened and it had a best by date of 10/08/23. A one pound bag of shredded lettuce which had been opened, not dated when opened and it had a best by date of 10/14/23. A container of sliced tomatoes not dated. Approximately one third of a tomato in a sandwich size zip lock bag not labeled or dated. Approximately four ounces of pepperoni in a one gallon size zip lock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared to the ordered consistency. This had the potential to affect five residents (#20, #26, #37,#42, and #130) of five residents who were ordered pureed meals. The facility census was 76. Findings included: On 10/17/23 at 11:30 A.M. Dietary #561 was observed preparing pureed (smooth consistency) chicken cordon bleu. Dietary #561 placed six chicken cordon bleu in the robot coup (industrial blender) and added chicken gravy. Dietary #561 pureed the chicken and after pureeing for approximately 60 seconds, tasted the puree, and reported it was ready to be served. This surveyor then tasted the chicken puree and had to chew pieces of the chicken, not providing a puree consistency. Dietary Manager #525 then tasted the chicken puree and verified she had to chew some. Dietary #561 continued to puree the chicken for an additional 30 seconds before the chicken reached a smooth consistency.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, resident record review, facility policy review and review Center for Disease Control (CDC) Guidelines, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn when care was provided to Resident #130 who was diagnosed with COVID-19. This had the potential to affect 39 (Resident #2, #3, #4, #5, #8, #9, #10, #11, #14, #15, #20, #21, #23, #24, #25, #26, #28, #30, #32, #33, #36, #37, #42, #45, #51, #53, #55, #56, #62, #63, #66, #67, #129, #130, #131, #132, #230, #229, and #231) of 39 residents residing on south wing without active COVID-19. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Review of Resident #130's medical record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #130's physician order, dated 10/14/23, identified she was to be in droplet precautions every shift for COVID until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a list of psychotropic medications provided by the facility and interview, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs) were up to date and accurate. This affected two residents (#30 and #37) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disordered (entered 02/18/22), bipolar disorder (entered 02/22/22), insomnia (entered 02/22/22), and generalized anxiety disorder (entered 11/08/22). Review of Resident #30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/18/23, revealed she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed she had active diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #30's physician order, dated 07/05/23, revealed she was prescribed clonazepam (an antianxiety agent) 0.5 milligrams (mg) to be administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents' masks and tubing for their noninvasive ventilation were cleaned every morning as ordered and failed to ensure documentation regarding cleaning was accurate. This affected two residents (#9 and #66) of five residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 76. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes, dependence on respirator, atherosclerotic heart disease, and morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation. Review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/20/23, revealed she was cognitively intact, had an active diagnosis of debility, cardiorespiratory condition, and received oxygen. Review of Resident #9's physician order, dated 07/22/22, identified she was to have her trilogy mask and all tubing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication orders were followed. This affected one resident (#20) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, essential hypertension, other specified peripheral vascular diseases, shortness of breath, and heart failure. Review of Resident #20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/22/23, revealed he was rarely/never understood and had short-term and long-term memory problems. Further review revealed he had active diagnoses of debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, coronary artery disease, heart failure and hypertension. Review of Resident #20's physician order, dated 09/27/23, identified he was to receive Midodrine HCL (an anti-low blood pressure agent used to raise the blood pressure) oral tablet three times a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure hospice visitation notes, assessments and communication were maintained in Resident #16's medical record. This affected one resident (#16) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/29/17 with diagnoses that included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure. Further review of the medical record including physician's orders revealed Resident #16 was admitted to hospice on 04/25/19. Review of the hospice records including visitation notes and assessments revealed the last visitation note and assessment in the medical record was from 07/05/23. On 10/18/23 at 8:25 A.M. interview with medical records (MR) #571 revealed she had not received any documentation from Resident #16's hospice provider for several months. MR #571 indicated she assumed Resident #16 was no longer on hospice services and did not ask or inform anyone of not receiving any hospice documentation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of an end of shift checklist, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions to prevent contamination spoilage and/or food borne illness. This had the potential to affect 74 of 74 residents who received meal trays from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#58, #74 and #475) who received nothing by mouth. Findings include: On 01/19/22 beginning at 10:37 A.M. an initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Supervisor #106 revealed the following concerns: A container of Barolta Pasta was opened, not sealed or dated when open. A container of Barolta elbow macaroni pasta was opened and not dated when opened. The walk-in freezer had beef burgers opened to air. The box was opened and the plastic bag the burgers were in was also opened and not sealed. A box of grilled chicken breast fillets was opened, the plastic bag was opened to the freezer air and not sealed. The reach in refrigerator had four rusty shelves. The reach in refrigerator had seals deteriorating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure all resident rooms were in good repair and properly cleaned. This affected four residents (#60, #35, #19 and #74) of 77 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 01/18/22 at 1:23 P.M. observation of Resident #35 and #60's shared room revealed a large gouge in the wall approximately three inches by one foot. On 01/18/22 at 2:01 P.M. interview with Resident #60 revealed concerns her room was dirty. Observation during the interview revealed dust around the base board, a piece of paper and wrappers among other dirt on the floor near the resident's television. On 01/19/22 at 8:23 A.M. observation of Resident #60 and Resident #35's room revealed the floor had not been cleaned and the same dirt as previously observed on 01/18/22 was still present. Interview with Resident #60 at the time of the observation confirmed the room had not been swept since yesterday. On 01/19/22 at 2:04 P.M. the condition of the resident's room remained the same. There was dust, pieces of rubber and papers on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure insulin and tuberculin solution were labeled appropriately after opening. This affected eight residents (#4, #479, #1, #22, #52, #175, #65 and #39 and had the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/05/20 with diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type two. Review of Resident #4's physician's orders revealed an order for Novolog insulin solution and Basaglar insulin solution for daily use. On 01/19/22 at 8:32 A.M. observation with Registered Nurse (RN) #177 revealed Resident #4's Novolog insulin solution and Basaglar solution were opened and had been used but did not include a date as to when they had been opened. Interview on 01/19/22 at 8:32 A.M. with RN #177 confirmed the medications were open, used and undated. 2. Review of Resident #479's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/15/22 with diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type two. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident room repairs and issues were addressed timely after identification from staff. This affected 36 rooms of 52 rooms in the facility. The facility census was 77. Findings include: On 01/19/22 at 3:22 P.M. interview with Maintenance #184 revealed he did a walk through the facility and had identified areas of resident rooms including walls that needed repaired. Maintenance #184 revealed he had started on the North end of the facility but had only fixed one room as of this date. Review of the Room to Room Inspection Sheets, dated 11/17/21 revealed the following environmental issues were identified that needed repaired/addressed: room [ROOM NUMBER] needed painted behind bed. room [ROOM NUMBER] needed painting in the bathroom and the toilet was leaking. room [ROOM NUMBER] the door jams needed painted and minor touch up on the walls. room [ROOM NUMBER] the paint needed touched up behind bed B and the bathroom. The door jams need touched up. room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-24 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident funds review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #3's funds were safeguarded, properly managed and not returned to the Treasurer of Ohio following stimulus money received by the resident. This affected one resident (#3) of 43 residents identified to have personal funds managed by the facility. Findings include: On 01/20/22 at 5:20 P.M. review of the resident personal fund accounts with the Administrator, who was onsite at the facility and Business Office Manager (BOM) #149 via phone revealed the following: Resident #3 was reviewed for spend down notice. Record review revealed the resident's representative, her sister was sent a spend down letter on 11/12/21. The letter indicated Resident #3's personal funds exceeded the $2000.00 Medicaid allowance. The resident trust had a balance of $3957.52. The letter advised that if the account was over the $2000.00 limit, the resident would no longer qualify for Medicaid and indicated due to the fact this balance was over the $2000.00 limit, please take the necessary steps to spend down the money immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-24 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives received bed hold notification prior to transfer to the hospital. This affected two residents (#74 and #76) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #76's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/30/21 with diagnoses including diabetes, congestive heart failure and hypertension. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident was hospitalized from [DATE] through 11/11/21. The resident returned to the facility on [DATE]. The medical record did not contain evidence the resident or resident representative were notified of the facility bed hold procedure. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident was hospitalized on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. The medical record did not contain evidence the resident or resident representative were notified of the facility bed hold policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #65 and Resident #69, who required staff assistance for activities of daily living received timely and adequate assistance with oral care and/or showers. This affected two residents (#65 and #69) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including constipation, cognitive communication disorder, dysphagia, unexpected lack of expected normal physiological development in childhood, hypertension, oxygen dependent, anemia, diverticulosis, scoliosis, angina pectoris, bilateral cataracts, Alzheimer's disease, and Type 2 diabetes. Review of the 01/18/21 Activity of Daily Living (ADL) plan of care revealed the resident may require assistance with ADL's and may be at risk of developing complications associated with decreased ADL self-performance. Interventions included I can perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure urinary drainage bags were maintained without potential for contamination to decrease the risk of urinary tract infections and/or failed to ensure resident catheter orders were comprehensive and implemented as written. This affected two residents (#7 and #60) of two residents reviewed for urinary/indwelling catheters. The facility identified six residents with urinary catheters. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/09/19 with diagnoses including hypertension, benign prostate hyperplasia (enlarged prostate gland), obstructive and reflux uropathy (a blockage in the urinary tract). Review of the alteration in elimination due to a urinary catheter related to obstructive uropathy and urinary retention plan of care initiated 08/14/19 revealed interventions including change urinary catheter as ordered and as needed. Review of the non-compliance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, review of nutritional formula information and interview the facility failed to provide the appropriate tube feeding to meet nutritional needs for one resident (Resident #475) and failed to timely address a significant weight loss for one resident (Resident #53). This affected two residents (#53 and #475) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified four residents with feeding tubes and ten residents with unplanned significant weight changes. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #53's open medical record revealed diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, anemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A weight of 195 was recorded 11/05/21 and a weight of 184 pounds was recorded on 12/07/21. A dietary assessment narrative, dated 12/15/21 at 6:00 P.M. indicated Resident #53 had a significant weight loss of 5.6% of his body weight in one month. However, Resident #53 had a significant weight gain of 10.8% in six months. The weight loss occurred post COVID-19 as the resident became more mobile. The note indicated Resident #53 was eating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #19's oxygen was delivered at the rate ordered and failed to notify the physician when the resident's rate of oxygen was increased. This affected one resident (#19) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Record review for Resident #19 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, dysphagia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery and Barrette's esophagus. Review of the care plan, dated 10/22/21 revealed Resident #19 required oxygen due to diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, tracheostomy, and respiratory failure . Interventions included administer oxygen as ordered, medication as ordered, monitor lung sounds as ordered, monitor oxygen saturation as ordered, respiratory assessment/monitoring (by nurse), observe for signs of dyspnea that was labored respirations, low oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-24 · tag F0772 — isolatedHave an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility guidance review and interview the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing for Resident #33 was obtained as ordered. This affected one resident (#33) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, major depressive disorder, dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #33's current physician's orders revealed an order for Seroquel 25 milligrams (antipsychotic) with directions to give half a tablet by mouth two times a day for dementia and an order (initiated 09/15/20) to obtain a fasting lipid panel annually in September due to the anti-psychotic medication use. Review of Resident #33's laboratory testing revealed Resident #33's last had a fasting lipid panel completed on 09/16/20. On 01/20/22 at 3:59 P.M. interview with Director of Nursing #103 confirmed Resident #33's fasting lipid panel was last done on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of Loeb Minimum Criteria for Initiating Antibiotic Therapy, review of the facility policy and procedure and interview the facility failed to ensure antibiotic use was appropriate to treat an infection for Resident #60. This affected one resident (#60) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/19/19 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, diabetes and dementia. Review of the alteration in elimination due to diagnoses of diabetes, dementia, wound to buttocks and indwelling catheter plan of care initiated 03/26/19 revealed interventions included to monitor for signs and symptoms such as elevated temperature, dysuria (painful urination), flank pain, hematuria (blood in urine) and/or foul smelling urine, report to the physician and seek diagnosis and treatment promptly. Review of the resident was at risk for infection related to urinary tract infection plan of care initiated 04/08/21 revealed interventions included give antibiotic therapy as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-08-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 4.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLLERAN, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2019 |
| KRYSTOWSKI, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2018 |
| FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2019 |
| SHREVE, CAMERON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/12/2017 |
| JAO, MONINA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365975. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.