Waterview Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 68.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, beneficiary notice review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of what type of skilled services were being terminated. This affected three residents (#2, #20 and #83) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notifications.Findings include:Findings Include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #83 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. Review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage dated 04/28/25 for Resident #83 revealed her skilled services were ending on 04/30/25. The facility failed to document what skilled services were ending on 04/30/25. 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage dated 04/08/25 for Resident #20 revealed current services was ending on 04/10/25. The facility failed to document what skilled services were ending on 04/10/25 for Resident #20. 3. Medical record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE].Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of email correspondence to the local Ombudsman, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the State Ombudsman was notified of a resident's discharge from the facility. This affected one resident (#81) of three residents reviewed for discharge. Findings include: Review of Resident #81's closed medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder, and tremors. She had a discharge date to home on [DATE]. Review of Resident #81's Discharge Plan of Care and Recapitulation dated 06/13/25 revealed the resident was there for a respite stay. Review of an email correspondence from the facility's social worker (Social Service Designee #202) to the State Ombudsman's email address dated 07/07/25 at 4:04 P.M. revealed Social Service Designee (SSD) #202 sent an email notifying the local State Ombudsman of discharges that had occurred for the prior month (June 2025). There were 13 residents on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to attempt new interventions for skin conditions (non-pressure related) and behaviors for Resident #42. This affected one resident (#42) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents were positioned appropriately in their wheelchair. This affected one resident (#45) of one resident reviewed for positioning. The facility census was 69. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, seborrheic dermatitis, and psoriasis. Review of a care plan dated 06/27/22 revealed Resident #42 was at risk for alteration in skin integrity related to Lewy body dementia, pain, recent hip replacement, psoriasis- areas come and go (mainly on face)- picks at skin on face, and seborrheic dermatitis which comes and goes. Interventions included but were not limited to complete skin assessments per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe environment for a resident left unattended with medications. This affected one resident (#28) of 69 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, anxiety disorder, chronic pain and cerebral infarction without residual deficits. Review of the electronic Order Summary Report dated 07/31/25 revealed no evidence the resident was capable to self-administer medications. There was also no physician order for Resident #28's medications could be left at bedside unsupervised by the nurse. On 07/31/25 at 7:45 A.M., the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #130 at the medication cart in the 400 hallway preparing medications. Resident #28's door was closed and permission to enter the room was obtained after knocking on the door twice. As the surveyor entered the resident's room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician addressed all the recommendations made by the facility's consulting pharmacist for irregularities that were identified during their monthly medication regimen review. This affected two residents (#3 and #8) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included schizo-affective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of a pharmacy recommendation following a monthly medication regimen review of Resident #3's medications on 03/19/25 revealed the facility's consulting pharmacist recommended the physician consider a gradual dosage reduction (GDR) attempt regarding the resident's use of Zyprexa 10 milligrams (mg) daily, Remeron 15 mg at bedtime, Buspar 10 mg daily, and Paxil 20 mg daily. The physician agreed with the recommendation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to follow physician ordered parameters for medication administration. This affected two residents (#3, #5) of five residents reviewed for medication regimens.Findings Include:1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, adult onset diabetes mellitus, malignant neoplasm of the colon, schizo-affective disorder of the bipolar type, and mild intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #3's physician's orders revealed the resident had an order to receive Hydrocodone- Acetaminophen (Norco) 5-325 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) every six hours prn for pain rating 5-10. That order originated on 07/18/25. He also had an order to receive Tylenol Extra Strength 500 mg tablets with directions to give two tablets every six hours prn for a pain rating of 1-5. Review of Resident #3's electronic medication administration record (eMAR) for June 2025 revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain adequate infection control practices during the administration of medications. This affected two residents (#35 and #51) of three residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #35 was admitted on [DATE] and Resident #51 was admitted on [DATE].On 07/29/25 between 8:48 A.M. and 9:15 A.M., observation of both Resident #35 and #51's morning medication administrations revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #200 would apply gloves, open the medication cart, removed the pharmacy package and over-the-counter bottles of the ordered medications from multiple drawers on the medication cart and then dispense the medications into his gloved hand. The medications would then be placed into the medication cup. Twice during the observations, RN #200 was observed opening the lid to the trash can to dispose of a wasted medication and throw away trash. The electronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to evaluate and treat a resident's skin condition. This affected one of one resident (#31) reviewed for non pressure skin impairment. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 07/22/22 with diagnoses including psoriasis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #31 required partial to moderate assistance with showers and or bathing and supervision with personal hygiene. The assessment indicated Resident #31 had no skin impairments however received application of ointment/medication to site other than his feet. Review of the physician orders dated May 2024 revealed Resident #31 had an order for Ketoconazole external shampoo 2 percent to apply to scalp topically every day shift on Monday and Thursday for Seborrhea. Review of the Medication Administration Record for May 2024 revealed Resident #31 received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, resident interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This affected one of one residents reviewed for falls (#12). The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 02/29/24 and diagnoses including morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of a fall risk assessment 02/29/24 revealed the resident was at risk for falls and had a history of a fall in the last 30 days. It indicated the resident's balance was not steady moving from a seated to standing position or with walking. Review of an incident report revealed on 03/04/24 at 4:30 P.M. Resident #12 was noted on the floor in her bathroom. The resident was sitting on her buttocks facing the grab bar with her legs straight out in front of her. The resident stated that staff assisted her to the bathroom and gave her the call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to monitor a dialysis site per the resident centered care plan. This affected one resident (#26) of one resident reviewed who was receiving dialysis. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26, revealed an admission date of 10/18/20. Diagnoses included: type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe) and dysphagia, oral phase. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15. The resident was assessed to require independent with bed mobility and transfers from bed and chairs, with supervision or touching assistance with tub/shower transfers and partial moderate assistance with shower/bathe self. Review of the progress note dated 04/10/24 for Resident #26 revealed the placement of a central venous line (CVL) for dialysis with no documentation on the location and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH