No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Gardens Of Fairfax Health Care Center

9014 Cedar Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 89 certified beds · (216) 795-1363 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$122,234 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $122,234 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Cleveland Clinic Main Campus - Emergency Room, 9105 Cedar Ave
Pharmacy
CCF P1 Parking Garage (1st Floor) · (216) 444-2255 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2214 E 89th St · (216) 254-4337 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8869 Cedar Ave · (216) 421-1516

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.1%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms32.6%30.1%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.4%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.8%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.1%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.2%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
1.33
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.71
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
68.8%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 58.5 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), staff statements, local police incident report, National Centers for Environmental Information, the [NAME] Cleveland Ohio Neighborhood Guide, the facility's Elopement policy and procedure and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident #1, who was assessed to be cognitively impaired and at risk for elopement, to prevent the resident from exiting the facility without staff knowledge. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the likelihood for serious harm, injury, or death on 03/16/24 between 3:30 P.M. and 4:10 P.M. when Resident #1 exited the facility without staff knowledge. Resident #1 was wearing a wanderguard bracelet (a device that activates an alarm and locks armed doors when the wearer approaches within a set parameter of the door) that failed to lock the doors or set off an alarm to alert facility staff. Resident #1's whereabouts were unknown until approximately 7:20 P.M. when a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, review of dialysis center documentation, review of an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) run sheet, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate amounts of oxygen to ensure safe breathing. This affected one resident (Resident #60) of one resident requiring oxygen on outside appointments. Facility census was 58. Findings include:Review of Resident #60's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 01/30/26 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, reduced mobility, insomnia, hypertension, paraplegia, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes and unspecified psychosis. Resident #60 discharged to home on [DATE].Review of Resident #60's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was cognitively intact, did not ambulate, used oxygen and received dialysis services.Review of Resident #60's physician's orders revealed an order dated 02/02/26 for dialysis Mondays,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-12 · tag F0800 — widespread
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of meal times, and review of the dining room checklist, the facility failed to maintain effective communication and processes to ensure a timely meal service and ensure adequate portions of the main entree were available. This had the potential to effect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified one Resident (#7) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO) who did not receive meals from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 61.Findings include: Observations on 02/11/26 of the lunch meal service revealed service began at 11:55 A.M. in the main kitchen area to serve residents who would be eating in their room. The menu included meatloaf, corn, and mashed potatoes. There were three insulated carts delivered. Following delivery of the carts, [NAME] #804 loaded trays of food from the steamtable into a heated cart and took the cart to the second floor servery at 12:34 P.M. [NAME] #804 unloaded trays onto another steamtable and began to take temperatures of each food item. There was a large spill of creamed corn on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #49's allegation of missing funds was reported to the State Agency. This affected one resident (Resident #49) out of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 61.Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/19/26 and diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to embolism of the left vertebral artery, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, and vascular dementia.Review of Resident #49's care plan dated 01/20/26 included Resident #49 required maximal assistance with ADL's (Activity of Daily Living)'s and might be at risk of developing complications associated with decreased ADL self-care performance related to decreased mobility, CVA with hemiparesis and dementia. Resident #49 would have his ADL needs met through his next review date. Interventions included Resident #49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on care received the appropriate assistance. This affected three Residents (#5, #21, and #49) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) assistance. The facility census was 61.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 08/16/22 and diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and altered mental status. Review of plan of care dated 01/20/25 revealed Resident #21 may require assistance with ADLs due to cognitive impairment and disease process. Interventions included provide assistance with bathing and grooming which included nail care, shaving, and hair care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had a moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for ADLs including bathing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #60's dialysis access site was immediately monitored upon her return to the facility from dialysis for bleeding and other complications. This affected one resident (#60) out of two residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 61.Findings include: Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/25/25 and diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD), type two diabetes mellitus with hypoglycemia, polyneuropathy and dependence on renal dialysis.Review of Resident #60's care plan dated 12/27/25 included Resident #60 was at risk for complications due to hemodialysis treatments three times weekly for ESRD. Resident #60 would receive hemodialysis treatments as scheduled with monitoring of disease process. Interventions included dialysis treatments were every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday; monitor right upper chest tunneled dialysis catheter every shift and notify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations approved by the physician were implemented in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#4) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy reviews. The facility census was 61.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, schizophrenia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia.Review of the facility document titled Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) dated 04/24/25 and 06/23/25 revealed Resident #4's medical records were reviewed and the consultant Pharmacist recorded the Medication Review Results referenced to see recommendations. Review of the facility document titled Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber (APP) dated 04/24/25 and 06/23/25 revealed the consultant Pharmacist made recommendations on both dates for laboratory testing, including Valproic Acid Level (VALs) and Liver Function…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an elopement was reported to the State Agency. This affected one resident (#50) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 47.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 05/14/24 and a discharge date of 09/16/25. Diagnoses included emphysema, malignant neoplasm of the cecum, malignant neoplasm of the upper left female breast, and personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and cerebral infarction without residual deficits. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) (modified) annual assessment, dated 06/12/25, revealed Resident #50 had severely impaired cognition. The resident was independent for mobility, transfers, toileting, ambulation, upper and lower body dressing, and donning and doffing footwear. Resident #50 had no episodes of recorded wandering. Review of mood revealed she had total severity score of 13, indicating moderate depression.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLAINCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of the closed medical record, interview, review of the facility's investigation, interviews with facility staff, and review of the facility policy on elopement, facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision to prevent Resident #50 from leaving the facility unsupervised. This affected one resident (#50) of three residents reviewed for elopement and supervision. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 05/14/24 and a discharge date of 09/16/25. Diagnoses included emphysema, malignant neoplasm of the cecum, malignant neoplasm of the upper left female breast, and personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and cerebral infarction without residual deficits. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) (modified) annual assessment, dated 06/12/25, revealed Resident #50 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of medical record, Self-Reported Incident report/investigation, and the facility's abuse policy and procedure the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedure related to an injury of unknown origin. This affected one (Resident #14) of seven residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 04/01/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. Resident #14 was receiving hospice services. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/23/24, revealed Resident #14 had impaired cognition. Review of progress note dated 02/24/24 timed 8:00 A.M. authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #106 revealed State Tested Nurse Assistant (STNA) #105 observed Resident #14 had a black eye. LPN #106 entered Resident #14's room and observed the eye. Resident #14 told LPN #14 that it happened at night. When LPN #106 asked if the injury occurred as a result of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, Self-Reported Incident report/investigation review and abuse policy and procedure review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse. This affected one (Resident #14) of seven residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 04/01/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. Resident #14 was receiving hospice services. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/23/24, revealed Resident #14 had impaired cognition. Review of progress note dated 02/24/24 timed 8:00 A.M. authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #106 revealed State Tested Nurse Assistant (STNA) #105 observed Resident #14 had a black eye. LPN #106 entered Resident #14's room and observed the eye. Resident #14 told LPN #14 that it happened at night. When LPN #106 asked if the injury occurred as a result of an accident or if it was purposeful,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide feeding assistance in a timely manner for dependent residents. This affected one (Resident #14) of seven residents reviewed. The census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 04/01/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. Resident #14 was receiving hospice services. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/23/24, revealed Resident #14 had impaired cognition and required supervision or hands on assistance for eating. Review of the plans of care revealed no plan related to nutrition or assistance needed for eating. Review of the nutritional assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 received a liberal renal pureed diet with nectar thickened liquid. Resident #14 required supervision, set-up, and assistance with eating. Resident #14 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan for one resident (#48) of two residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 10/28/23. Medical diagnoses included hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, dementia, encephalopathy, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and pressure ulcer of sacral region. Review of the physician orders for Resident #48 revealed an order dated 11/01/23 that stated to cleanse right lateral calf wound with normal saline, pat dry, apply oil emulsion gauze and cover with abdominal pad and wrap with Kerlix gauze every night shift every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and as needed. Further review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 11/01/23 that stated to cleanse sacral wound with normal saline, pat dry, pack wound with Vashe moistened gauze and cover with foam every night shift. Review of Resident #48's care plan dated 11/01/23 revealed no care plan for wound care or skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for one resident (#9) of two residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/11/20. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, pulmonary hypertension, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, and chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. Review of the physician orders for Resident #9 revealed an order dated 05/26/20 for Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNR-CC). Review of Resident #9's care plan dated 05/11/20 revealed the care plan did not include residents code status wish. Interview on 12/05/23 at 3:02 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #335 confirmed Resident #9's comprehensive person-centered care plan did not reflect that Resident #9 had a DNR-CC in effect.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility policy review, personnel file review and interview, the facility failed to implement the screening component of their abuse policy and procedure to ensure all potential new hires were checked against the state Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) to ensure no employee had findings concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of residents' property. The facility also retained staff after 30 days when background check results were not received. This affected six out of 14 employees whose personnel files were reviewed and had the potential to affect all 45 residents in the facility. Findings Include: Review of 14 personnel records on 05/10/23 starting at 12:29 P.M. with Human Resource Coordinator (HRC) #202 revealed the following concerns: a. Review of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #218's personnel file revealed a re-hire date of 04/11/23. The file contained no evidence of STNA #218 being checked against the NAR and no evidence background checks had been completed upon re-hire. b. Review of Dietary Aide (DA) #204's personnel file revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was on-site eight hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents in the facility. Findings Include: 1. Review of posted staffing sheets from 04/01/23 to 05/06/23 revealed a RN was not in the facility on 04/01/23, 04/02/23, 04/03/23, 04/06/23, 04/07/23, 04/08/23, 04/09/23, 04/10/23, 04/13/23, 04/14/23, 04/15/23, 04/16/23, 04/17/23, 04/20/23, 04/21/23, 04/22/23, 04/23/23, 04/27/23, 04/28/23, 04/29/23 and 05/06/23. Interview on 05/09/23 at 9:14 A.M. with Scheduler #220 verified the identified dates did not meet the required eight hours of RN coverage as required. 2. Review of the staffing schedules for 04/30/23 to 05/06/23 with Scheduler #220 on 05/09/23 at 12:05 P.M. revealed the facility did not have an RN onsite on any shift on 05/06/23. Interview on 05/09/23 at 4:31 P.M. with the Administrator revealed if RN #235 was not working the facility tried to obtain an RN through a staffing agency but at times, staffing was tight. The Administrator was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food was served at safe and appetizing temperatures. This affected 44 residents receiving food from the kitchen. Resident #25 was ordered nothing-by-mouth. The facility census was 45. Findings Include: Review of the Fall/Winter Week Two menu for Monday corresponding to 05/08/23 revealed the meal to be served for lunch included Salisbury steak, garlic mashed potatoes, stewed tomatoes, wheat bread, margarine, coconut cream pie and beverage of choice. Observation on 05/08/23 at 11:37 A.M. revealed [NAME] #209 was taking temperatures for lunch tray service with the facility's self-calibrating electronic thermometer. Food temperatures obtained were as follows: sour cream (on ice) 33.5 degrees Fahrenheit (F); Salisbury steak, 203 degrees F; baked potato, 191 degrees F; stewed tomatoes, 173 degrees F; and mashed potatoes 196 degrees F. Trayline started 11:46 A.M. At 12:03 P.M. staff started making trays for the two carts for the first floor and a test tray was requested. The test tray was made at 12:22 P.M., on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen. This affected 44 residents receiving food from the kitchen. Resident #25 was ordered nothing-by-mouth. The facility census was 45. Findings Include: Observation of the kitchen on 05/07/23 from 8:54 A.M. to 9:45 A.M. with [NAME] #209 revealed the following concerns: • The walk-in cooler lacked an internal thermometer. On the shelves, two bags of shredded mozzarella cheese, a lemon meringue pie and a strawberry cream pie did not have dates on them. • On the bread cart, four loaves of bread had a use by date of 04/24/23 and two loaves of bread had a use by date of 05/02/23. Buns and wraps were present but also undated. • On a pull cart, three packs of ham were undated. • In the freezer, a bag of unidentifiable meat was not dated and had a lot of ice buildup. On the shelf, 11 pans of macaroni and cheese lacked a date. There was also no internal thermometer inside the freezer. • In the dry stock room, cans did not have a date received to ensure appropriate rotating. A bottle of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary laundry service, privacy curtains were changed when visibly dirty, a comprehensive legionella program, and yearly screening for tuberculosis. This affected all 45 residents residing at the facility. Findings Include: 1. Observation on 05/10/23 at 10:29 A.M. with Building Manager #226 revealed in the soiled area of the laundry processing area there were two large washing machines and one smaller washing machine. The smaller washing machine had clothing inside. An attempt to open the door of the smaller washing machine revealed it would not open. The tops of both large washers had sticky liquid spills, and dust. Interview at the time of the observation with Building Manager #226 revealed he was unsure how long the small washer had not been in service nor how long the clothes locked inside had been there. Further observation of the clean side of the laundry processing area revealed a bath robe and additional clothing items on hangers hanging from a metal pipe just below the ceiling. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive antibiotic stewardship program. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents residing at the facility including Residents (#9, #15, #23, #27, #39 and #40) who received antibiotics between March 2023 and May 2023. Findings Include: Interview on 05/09/23 at 9:24 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility kept a log of resident infections in a notebook which was tracked by type of organism, type of antibiotic used and mapped by room to identify potential patterns. If a physician ordered an antibiotic prior to obtaining culture and sensitivity results, the nurse wrote a progress note that McGreer's criteria (antibiotic surveillance definitions specific for benchmarking appropriate antibiotic usage) had not been met and the physician was notified. When an antibiotic was started prior to obtaining the culture and sensitivity results, and the lab results indicated the current antibiotic was an inappropriate antibiotic, the physician was notified. The DON stated the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to provide nail care for residents unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) without assistance. This affected three (Residents #2, #8, and #26) of four residents reviewed for ADLs. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 06/04/21. Diagnoses included type II diabetes, heart disease, chronic kidney disease, blindness of one eye, and glaucoma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/31/23, revealed Resident #8 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, limited assistance with transfers, total dependence for dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated 05/03/23 revealed Resident #8 had a self-care performance deficit related to blindness. Intervention included one person assistance for personal hygiene, bathing, and dressing. Observation on 05/07/23 at 3:27 P.M. of Resident #8's fingernails…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring for medication effects and potential adverse consequences was completed for residents who were receiving psychotropic medications. This affected four residents (#2, #8, #11 and #41) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 45 residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/25/20 and diagnoses including type two diabetes, schizophrenia, anemia, hypertension and hypertension. Review of Resident #11's plan of care dated 11/25/20 revealed she used lexapro and trazodone. Interventions listed included: administer antidepressant medications as ordered by physician. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness each shift and monitor/document/report as needed (PRN) adverse reactions to antidepressant therapy: change in behavior/mood/cognition; hallucinations/delusions; social isolation, suicidal thoughts, withdrawal; decline in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared in a manner that preserved nutritional value. This affected five residents (Residents #6, #15, #16, #24 and #34) receiving a pureed diet. The facility census was 45. Findings Include: Review of the Fall/Winter Week Two menu for Monday corresponding to 05/08/23 revealed the meal to be served for lunch included Salisbury steak, garlic mashed potatoes, stewed tomatoes, wheat bread, margarine, coconut cream pie and beverage of choice. Observation on 05/08/23 starting at 10:56 A.M. with [NAME] #209 revealed she was making pureed stewed tomatoes for the lunch meal. [NAME] #209 indicated she needed six purees but would make seven portions. [NAME] #209 then stated she needed four purees so would make five portions. [NAME] #209 put five #8-scoops of stewed tomatoes into the food processor along with 2/3 cup of vegetable broth and 1/2 cup of thickener. [NAME] #209 blended the product then added another 1/2 cup of broth. Interview with [NAME] #209 during the observation revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible for residents. This affected one resident (Resident #46) of two residents (Resident #12 and #46) reviewed for call light placement. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 12/17/22. Diagnoses included but were not limited to cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of right posterior cerebral artery, type II diabetes mellitus and adult failure to thrive. Review of the 04/08/23 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #46 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #46 required extensive assist of one for bed mobility, transfer, walk in room, locomotion off unit, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and supervision of one for locomotion on unit, and eating. Resident #46 was noted to frequently be incontinent of bladder. Review of the 04/20/23 revised care plan for Resident #46 revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of potential abuse related to an injury of unknown origin as required. This affected one resident (Resident #29) of four residents (Residents #26, #29, #35, and #147) reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 45. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 09/02/22. Diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, adult failure to thrive and osteoarthritis. Review of 02/22/23 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #29 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #29 required supervision of one for bed mobility, transfer, walking in room, dressing, eating, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #29 was noted to use a cane and wheelchair for mobility. Review of Resident #29's care plan revealed she has limited physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation related to and injury of unknown origin for Resident #29 and an allegation of alleged sexual abuse for Resident #35. This affected two (Resident #29 and #35) of four residents (#26, #29, #35 and #147) reviewed for abuse. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, adult failure to thrive and osteoarthritis. Review of the [DATE] quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #29 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #29 required supervision of one for bed mobility, transfer, walking in room, dressing, eating, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #29 was noted to use a cane and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan. This affected one resident (Resident #148) of three residents reviewed for new admissions. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #148 revealed an admission date of 05/02/23. Diagnoses included heart disease, gout, osteoarthritis, repeated falls, and retention of urine. Review of the baseline assessment, dated 05/02/23 revealed Resident #148 experienced confusion, had a history of falls, an unsteady gait, poor balance, and was impulsive. Resident #148 used a walker. Review of the baseline care plan dated 05/03/23 revealed information regarding nutritional risk. The care plan did not include information regarding falls, unsteady gait, confusion, impulsiveness or urinary retention. Interview on 05/09/23 at 1:13 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #225 verified the baseline care only included Resident #148 had a nutrition risk and the care plan was not complete. LPN #225 stated she started the care plan but forgot to complete the care plan.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide Resident #8's restorative nursing program for ambulation and lower extremity exercises as ordered by the physician and as recommended upon discharge from physical therapy. This affected one (Resident #8) of two residents reviewed for physical therapy. Finding Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 06/04/21. Diagnoses included type II diabetes, heart disease, chronic kidney disease, blindness of one eye, and glaucoma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment, dated 03/31/22, revealed Resident #8 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers and ambulation. Review of the plan of care dated 05/03/23 revealed Resident #8 had a self-care performance deficit related to blindness. Intervention included one a person assist for personal hygiene, bathing, and dressing. Review of the physician orders dated 02/17/23 revealed an order to refer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care and monitoring. This affected one resident (Resident #44) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 45 residents. Findings Include: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/02/22 and diagnoses including acute kidney failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoarthritis, adult failure to thrive and gout. Review of Resident #44's bowel and bladder program screener dated 08/02/22 revealed a score of 19 indicating Resident #44 was a good candidate for retraining. Review of Resident #44's hospital paperwork revealed a urinary catheter was placed prior to his readmission to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a readmission bowel and bladder program screener dated 03/19/23 indicated Resident #44 scored a nine and was a candidate for scheduled toileting. The readmission bowel and bladder program screener did not mention a urinary catheter was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to obtain dialysis orders and ensure the dialysis care plan included individualized interventions which accurately reflected the care needs of the resident. This affected one of one resident (Resident #12) reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified two residents (Residents #2 and #12) receiving dialysis. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 07/13/19. Diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia, end stage renal disease and chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic heart failure. Review of the 03/14/23 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #12 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09 which indicated Resident #12 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of activities of daily living (ADLs) section of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #12 required extensive assist of one staff for bed mobility, total dependence of two staff for transfer, total dependence of one staff for locomotion on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy medication recommendations were timely addressed and followed up upon. This affected one resident (Resident #41) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 45 residents. Findings Include: Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/05/21 and diagnoses including bipolar disorder, current episode manic severe with psychotic features, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, insomnia, history of COVID-19 and other specified mental disorders due to known physiological condition. Review of Resident #41's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was cognitively impaired and received antipsychotics and antidepressants. Review of a pharmacy medication recommendation for Resident #41 dated 07/22/22 revealed if not recently obtained and if indicated would you…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-10-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was staffed sufficiently to ensure all residents had assigned nursing coverage at all times. The facility was also not staffed sufficiently to ensure timely and appropriate fulfillment of physician's orders. This affected the 25 residents residing on the first floor (Resident #37, #6, #22, #43, #12, #58, #61, #41, #65, #20, #16, #168, #54, #44, #45, #7, #23, #25, #46, #49, #36, #55, #26, #18, and #13). The facility also did not staff sufficiently to meet minimum staffing needs required by the state of Ohio, affecting all residents in the facility. In addition, the facility did not staff sufficiently to ensure residents had the option of eating in the dining room, affecting the twenty-one residents who usually eat in the second-floor dining room [ROOM NUMBER] residents (Residents #1, #8, #9, #10, #15, #27, #31, #39, #47, #48, #50, #53, #56, #57, #59, #60, #63, #64, #65, #66 and #67). The facility census was 64. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-10-23 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) process, the facility did ensure the medical director participated in the QAA committee. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the QAA committee process revealed the medical director was not included in the QAA meetings. Interview with the Medical Director on 10/23/19 at 8:49 A.M. revealed that he had been the medical director of the facility since 04/2019 and had never participated in or been invited to a QAA meeting at the facility.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for isolation precautions for one resident (Resident #19) with clostridium difficile (C-diff), cleaning of glucometers for two residents (Residents #20 and #5) and failed to have Legionella and Tuberculosis assessments. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with epilepsy, stage five kidney disease, protein malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (C-diff). Review of Resident #19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was always incontinent of bowel. On 10/21/19 at 7:40 A.M., tour of the laundry and interview with Laundry Aide #6 revealed that he did not know which linens were from isolation rooms because they were not separated, and he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide residents with their choice of eating in the dining room for meals. This affected the twenty-one residents who usually eat in the second-floor dining room (Residents #1, #8, #9, #10, #15, #27, #31, #39, #47, #48, #50, #53, #56, #57, #59, #60, #63, #64, #65, #66 and #67). The census was 64. Finding include: Observation on 10/20/19 at 4:45 P.M. revealed no residents were in the second-floor dining room. On 10/20/19 at 4:48 P.M. Resident #9 was heard asking Nurse Manager #49 why the dining room wasn't open today. Nurse Manager #49 stated that residents were going to eat in their rooms that evening. Interview on 10/22/19 at 9:57 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor #3 and Dietary Manager #16 revealed the dietary department had a list of which residents had chosen to usually ate in the second-floor dining room. The list included 21 residents (Residents #1, #8, #9, #10, #15, #27, #31, #39, #47, #48, #50, #53, #56, #57, #59, #60, #63, #64, #65, #66 and #67). The food for the second-floor residents was brought up in a steam table…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 and Resident #28 received the assistance they needed to receive regular showers. This affected two residents of 22 residents assessed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, cellulitis of right lower limb, arthritis and fibromyalgia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident required limited assistance for bed mobility. Transfers, locomotion, eating and toilet use were coded as only occurred once or twice. Dressing and personal hygiene were coded as not assessed. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the Task Sheet for Showers/Bathing for 09/24/19 through 10/22/19 revealed only two showers were completed, on 9/27/19 and on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the first floor was staffed sufficiently to ensure timely fulfillment of physician's orders and management of resident care needs. This affected the 25 residents residing on the first floor (Residents #37, #6, #22, #43, #12, #58, #61, #41, #65, #20, #16, #168, #54, #44, #45, #7, #23, #25, #46, #49, #36, #55, #26, #18, and #13). The facility census was 64. Findings include: Observation of the first floor of the facility, containing 25 residents, (Residents #37, #6, #22, #43, #12, #58, #61, #41, #65, #20, #16, #168, #54, #44, #45, #7, #23, #25, #46, #49, #36, #55, #26, #18, and #13) on 10/20/19 at 8:20 A.M. revealed no nurses engaged in any direct resident care. Interviews with State-Tested Nursing Aides (STNA) #53 and #71 on 10/20/19 at 8:23 A.M. revealed there was no nurse currently taking care of residents on the first floor. The night-shift nurse had departed, and the day-shift nurse had not yet arrived. Interview with STNA #53 on 10/20/19 at 10:16 A.M. revealed there was still no nurse assigned to provide care on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-23 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman and resident representatives were notified in writing of hospital transfers and rights. This affected two (Resident #28 and #69) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #69 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. She had not returned to the facility as of the time of the survey. The record review revealed no evidence the Ombudsman or representative had received written notice of the transfer or the rights to an appeal or bed-hold. Interview with Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #10 on 10/22/19 at 1:37 P.M. revealed when residents are hospitalized , their responsible parties were informed via telephone. The facility only notified the Ombudsman of hospital transfers if they were not anticipating the resident would return. Interview with LSW #10 on 10/22/19 at 4:17 P.M. confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment was coded accurately for Residents #26, #28, and #48. This affected three of 22 resident's reviewed for MDS 3.0 assessment accuracy. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia, diabetes mellitus, facial weakness and cerebral infarction. Review of the MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was rarely understood and eating was coded as the activity did not occur. Review of resident #26's medical record revealed physician's orders, medication administration records (MAR) and treatment administration records (TAR) for October 2019 revealed Resident #26 received nothing by mouth. The resident received enteral feeding (nutrition taken through a tube that goes directly into the stomach or small intestine) from 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. daily. Interview on 10/23/19 at 10:09…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were completed in 48 hours and a copy was provided to the resident. This affected one (Resident #19) of one resident reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, stage five kidney disease, protein malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (C-diff). Review of Resident #19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Interview on 10/23/19 at 10:09 A.M. with MDS Nurse #54 verified the baseline care plan was not completed and stated that baseline care plans are not completed. Review of the undated facility's policy entitled Advance Care Planning/Baseline Care Plan revealed that upon admission the resident and/or the responsible party shall be informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reactivated for Resident #28 after readmission, were developed related to dialysis for Resident #33 and were developed for antipsychotic medications and behaviors for Resident #40. This affected three residents of 22 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, cellulitis of right lower limb, arthritis and fibromyalgia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident required limited assistance for bed mobility. Transfers, locomotion, eating and toilet use were coded as only occurred once or twice. Dressing and personal hygiene were coded as not assessed. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Two care plans relative to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure tube feed was given according to physician's orders and quality standards of care. This affected one (Resident #26) of two residents at the facility who receive tube feeds (Resident #10 and #26). The facility census was 64. Findings include: Observation of Resident #26 on 10/20/19 at 10:18 A.M. revealed he had tube feed running into a gastric tube at 75 milliliters (ml) per hour. The feed bag was unlabeled and contained no information about the formula being fed, the date and time hung, the rate it was to run, and the time it was to come down. The feed bag was almost empty. The resident was not interviewable. Observation of Resident #26 on 10/20/19 at 10:37 A.M. and 10:59 A.M. revealed his tube feed bag was empty. The tube feed administration pump read feed error and was stopped. Tube feed formula was still visible in the tubing entering the resident's gastric tube. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #49 on 10/20/19 at 11:11 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to indicate why the administration of an as needed antipsychotic medication was necessary for one resident (Resident #61) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 64. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #61's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was rarely understood and received antipsychotic medications three days of the seven-day during the assessment reference period. Review of Resident #61's medical record, physician's orders, medication administration records (MAR) and treatment administration records (TAR) for September and October 2019 revealed Resident #61 received Haldol Solution (antipsychotic) intramuscularly one hour in the morning prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was enough personal protective equipment (PPE) for staff to wear during care with residents on isolation precautions. This affected one resident (Resident #19) and had the potential to affect all 64 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Observation and interview on 10/21/19 at 07:59 A.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #27 revealed that she was observed coming out of Resident #19's room without wearing any PPE on of any kind. Resident #19 had a diagnosis of clostridium difficile (C-diff). Interview of STNA #27 on 10/21/19 at 8:00 A.M. revealed there were no disposable gowns or masks in the PPE container hanging on the door. STNA #27 stated that the linen was put in a separate container and was double bagged. The first bag was dissolvable, and the clear bag went around it. She went to get a gown to go back into the room, and there were no disposable gowns available in the building. Observation and interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/21/19 at 8:05 A.M. revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-05-16 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data report, the facility failed to ensure consistent submission of information as required. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents in the facility. Findings Include: Review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data report for Quarter Three of 2022 (covering 04/01/22 to 06/30/22) revealed no staffing data was submitted by the facility for the quarter. Review of facility documentation for submission of PBJ data revealed the last data the facility submitted was on 05/12/22 for the dates 01/01/22 to 03/31/22. No more recent submission information was available for review. Interview on 05/08/23 at 4:26 P.M. with Human Resource Coordinator (HRC) #202 verified the facility last submitted PBJ data on 05/12/22. HRC #202 indicated she had been working in the facility on a part-time basis since October 2022 and had staffing data for November 2022 however did not have any evidence of submission.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-05-16 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, the facility failed to provide mandatory staff training on the facility's QAPI program. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of the facility's QAPI program for 2022 and 2023 revealed initiatives that included: Resident tuberculosis base line testing and documentation, COVID vaccine documentation, and code status posting policy upon admission. There was no evidence of mandatory staff training on the facility's QAPI program initiatives that included the goals and various elements of the program, how the facility intended to implement the program, and how to communicate concerns or opportunities for improvement. Interview on 05/15/23 at 12:27 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility had not provided the mandatory training to staff on the QAPI program. Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assessment and Assurance Program, undated revealed it was the responsibility of the quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-10-23 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post up-to-date staffing information in public areas. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents living at the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: Observation upon entry into the facility on [DATE] at 8:00 A.M. revealed the direct-care staffing information posted by the facility was dated 10/18/19. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/20/19 at 11:45 A.M. confirmed the posted staff schedule was from 10/18/19. This is an example of continued noncompliance from the survey completed on 10/08/19.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$122,234 in federal fines across 21 penalties.

  • $10,039 — penalty dated 2024-03-29
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
  • $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.9-1.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Inniswood Health and RehabilitationWesterville, OH 2 of 5Canterbury Villa Of AllianceAlliance, OH 2 of 5Park Health CenterSt Clairsville, OH 2 of 5Tuscany GardensPataskala, OH 2 of 5Veranda Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterCincinnati, OH 3 of 5Arlington Care CenterNewark, OH 3 of 5Bennington Glen Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterMarengo, OH 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Care CenterSt Clairsville, OH 3 of 5Emerald Pointe Health And Rehab CtrBarnesville, OH 3 of 5Hickory Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterAkron, OH 3 of 5Home At Taylor's PointeCincinnati, OH 3 of 5McNaughten Pointe Nursing And RehabColumbus, OH 3 of 5Meadow Grove Transitional CareGrove City, OH 3 of 5The Gables Of Marysville Health And RehabilitationMarysville, OH 3 of 5Timberland Ridge Nursing & RehabilitationFairlawn, OH 4 of 5Austin Trace Health And RehabilitationCenterville, OH 4 of 5Batavia Nursing Care CenterBatavia, OH 4 of 5Claymont Health And RehabilitationUhrichsville, OH 4 of 5Crown Pointe Care CenterColumbus, OH 4 of 5Florentine GardensLoveland, OH 4 of 5Hickory Creek Of AthensThe Plains, OH 4 of 5Jefferson Healthcare CenterJefferson, OH 4 of 5Lafayette Pointe Nursing & Rehab CtrWest Lafayette, OH 4 of 5Maria Joseph Living Care CenterDayton, OH 4 of 5Mill Creek Nursing & RehabilitationGalion, OH 4 of 5Respiratory And Nursing Center Of DaytonMoraine, OH 4 of 5Sycamore Run Nursing And Rehab CtrMillersburg, OH 4 of 5Waterview Pointe Nursing & RehabilitationMarietta, OH 4 of 5Woods On French Creek Nursing & Rehab Center TheAvon, OH 5 of 5Admirals Pointe Nursing & RehabilitationHuron, OH 5 of 5Brunswick Pointe Transitional CareBrunswick, OH 5 of 5Capri GardensLewis Center, OH 5 of 5Carington ParkAshtabula, OH 5 of 5Concord Health & Rehab CtrWheelersburg, OH 5 of 5Concord Ridge Health And RehabilitationMentor, OH 5 of 5Country View Of SunburySunbury, OH 5 of 5Darby Glenn Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHilliard, OH 5 of 5Glen MeadowsHamilton, OH 5 of 5Golden Years Nursing CenterHamilton, OH 5 of 5Highbanks Care CenterColumbus, OH

Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
COLLERAN, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
KRYSTOWSKI, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
EDEH, NKECHIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
BHAIJI, ALOKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366106. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next