Concord Health & Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 71.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have parameters for administration of two as needed pain medications for Resident #33. This affected one resident of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 03/15/24. Diagnoses included chronic pain. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was cognitively intact. Resident #33 had occasional moderate pain interfering with her activities of daily living. Review of the pain assessments dated 08/28/24 and 09/04/24 revealed Resident #33 had moderate pain described by the resident. Review of the plan of care revealed Resident #33 had pain related to recent re-fracture of right hip and surgery. The interventions included to assess/monitor pain and provide pain medication as ordered. Review of the physician orders dated 09/2024 revealed on 08/09/24, Resident #33 had an order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31 had appropriate clinical reason/diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication. This affected one (#31) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 12/11/23 with diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbance, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, psycho-physiologic insomnia, hallucinations, and delirium. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 was cognitively impaired with signs and symptoms of delirium, hallucinations, delusions and verbal behaviors directed to others. Resident #31 received antipsychotic medication seven of seven days during the look back period. The antipsychotics were reviewed on a routine basis with no gradual dose reduction attempted. Review of the plan of care for Resident #31 revealed no plan of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Power of Attorney (POA) was notified of a change in condition in the area of skin tears for one resident (#74). This affected one (Resident #74) of three residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 73. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #74 revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] with the diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare, displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Parkinsonism, generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, dysphagia, other symbolic dysfunctions, dysarthria and anarthria, repeated falls, protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, dementia, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, depression, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, dementia with behavioral disturbances, abnormal weight…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, interviews, facility investigation review and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the required state agency for one resident (#74). This affected one (Resident #74) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 73. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #74 revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] with the diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare, displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Parkinsonism, generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, dysphagia, other symbolic dysfunctions, dysarthria and anarthria, repeated falls, protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, dementia, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, depression, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, dementia with behavioral disturbances, abnormal weight loss, psychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, interviews, facility investigation review and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an allegation of abuse for one resident (#74). This affected one (Resident #74) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 73. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #74 revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] with the diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare, displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Parkinsonism, generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, dysphagia, other symbolic dysfunctions, dysarthria and anarthria, repeated falls, protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, dementia, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, depression, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, dementia with behavioral disturbances, abnormal weight loss, psychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of video camera footage, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified, professional manner by staff. This affected one resident (#46) with the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Record review for Resident #46 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, obstructive sleep apnea, epilepsy, heart failure, and muscle weakness. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/07/23, revealed this resident had mildly impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 10 out of 15. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting and to be independent with setup help only for eating. Review of the video camera footage, dated 06/28/23 and timed 6:13 A.M.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-07-18 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident personal funds accounts, policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents who were within $200.00 of the Social Security Income (SSI) resource limit of $2,000.00 were assisted in spending down the money so the resident did not lose their Medicaid eligibility. This affected two residents (#32 and #60) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, hypertension and dysphagia. Record review revealed the resident did not have a financial power of attorney or legal guardian. Review of Resident #60's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/13/2022 revealed the resident's speech was impaired and she was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #60's personal funds account on 07/11/2022 revealed she had $9,179.76 in her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-07-18 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review medical record review, policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #45's medical record contained evidence of contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident, resident representative information including contact information, advance directive information, all special instructions or precautions for ongoing care, as appropriate, and comprehensive care plan goals when the resident was discharged to the hospital. This affected one resident (#45) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 07/05/2022 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, type II diabetes, morbid obesity, anxiety and dysphagia. Review of Resident #45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/27/2022 revealed the resident's speech was clear, he made himself understood, he understands others and his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-07-18 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure bed hold information was provided to Resident #45 and/or the resident's representative at the time of transfer to the hospital. This affected one resident (#45) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Finding include: Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 07/05/2022 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, type II diabetes, morbid obesity, anxiety and dysphagia. Review of Resident #45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/27/2022 revealed the resident's speech was clear, he made himself understood, he understands others and his cognition was moderately impaired. Review of Resident #45's progress note, dated 07/04/2022 revealed Resident #45's daughter in-law was contacted, and she informed the nurse that Resident #45 had called her and he was talking about hurting himself. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-07-18 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) guidance and interview the facility failed to timely complete and submit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #63, who had been discharged from the facility. This affected one resident (#63) of 20 residents whose MDS 3.0 assessments were reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #63's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, muscle weakness and repeated falls. The resident was discharged from the facility on 05/13/22. Review of a nursing progress note, dated 05/13/22, revealed the resident was discharged to a Hospice house. Review of the MDS 3.0 assessments completed for Resident #63 revealed there had not been a discharge MDS assessment completed related to the resident's discharge from the facility as of 07/13/22. On 07/14/22 at 11:10 A.M. interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there had not been a discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH