Inniswood Health and Rehabilitation
1150 Colony Drive, Westerville, OH 43081 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (614) 891-5055 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $169,562 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-02)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 35.3% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.5% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.1% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.4% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.8% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.1% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.4% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 86.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, hospital record review, staff, physician and Registered Dietician (RD) interview, review of the Ohio Board of Dietetics (OBD) Standards of Practice in Nutrition Care, contract reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #32, who was identified at nutritional risk, was provided a comprehensive and individualized nutritional plan to include monitoring weights and nutritional status, physician and dietitian notification for weight loss and implementation of nutrition interventions to prevent severe weight loss. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm for Resident #32, who experienced severe weight loss from 09/07/23 to 10/04/23 when she lost 19.9 pounds, representing a weight loss of 10.05% in one month (September to October 2023); 6.5% from October to November and 6.0% from November to December 2023 with a total weight loss over this time period of 21.6 % of her body weight (a 43 pound weight loss) due to the facility repeated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement adequate skin risk interventions for Resident #32 to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer. Actual harm occurred on 08/24/23 when Resident #32, who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a displaced subtrochanteric fracture of right the femur with surgical repair and required extensive assistance with bed mobility for turning and repositioning developed a deep tissue injury (DTI) (A purple or maroon area of discolored intact skin due to damage of underlying soft tissue. The area may be preceded by tissue that is painful, firm, mushy, boggy, warmer, or cooler as compared to adjacent tissue.) to the right heel. The resident reported an increased amount of pain due to the development of the pressure ulcer. In addition, it was the resident's physician who first identified the DTI while on site at the facility on 08/24/23. The facility failed to implement comprehensive and individualized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, hospital records review, Hoyer Lift user manual review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #87 was transferred in a safe manner using a mechanical (Hoyer) lift (a mechanical device with a sling used to transfer residents from one place to another). Actual Harm occurred on 10/18/23 when Resident #87, who was dependent on two staff for transfers using a Hoyer lift, sustained a fall out of the lift resulting in a hospitalization and diagnosis of cervicalgia (pain in the neck and shoulders that varies in intensity, and may feel achy or like an electric shock from the neck to the arm) with an order for a cervical collar to be worn at all times for four weeks. The fall occurred as a result of the legs of the lift not being in proper position to accommodate a shift in the resident's weight during the transfer. This affected one resident (Resident #87) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-02-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate pain management for Resident #32 following an unwitnessed fall with pain to the right hip. Actual harm occurred on 07/31/23 when Resident #32 who was noted to have chronic hip pain and received scheduled Tylenol, was found on the floor screaming and pointing to her right leg at 4:30 A.M. The resident was assisted back into bed and continued to scream and point to her right leg for an additional two hours before Physician #502 was notified and an order was obtained for an x-ray. Additionally, the resident rated her pain as 7 out of 10 (zero being no pain and 10 being the worst pain possible) and was not given any pain medication until her scheduled Tylenol at 8:00 A.M. Subsequently the resident was assessed to have a displaced subtrochanteric fracture of right femur, leading to a transfer to a local acute care hospital on [DATE] at 2:15 P.M. and a surgical repair of the displaced subtrochanteric fracture of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for Resident #82. Actual harm occurred on 01/18/22 when Resident #82, who required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility and had a known history of pressure ulcers was identified to have an unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) pressure ulcer to the coccyx. There was no evidence the facility had adequate interventions in place to prevent the development of the ulcer and to promote healing once the ulcer was identified. The facility failed to ensure the pressure ulcer was timely identified prior to being found as an unstageable pressure ulcer and failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed and interventions were implemented to promote healing when the ulcer was first discovered. This affected one resident (#82) of two residents reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-06-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure hot water temperatures were provided to residents to maintain a homelike environment. This affected seven (#8, #21, #25, #64, #70, #85, and #90) of seven residents observed for water temperatures on the 400 and 500 hallway. The census was 86. Findings include:Observation on 06/14/26 at 08:23 A.M. of the hot water temperature from the bathroom faucet in room [ROOM NUMBER], occupied by Resident #64, revealed the hot water was tepid to touch.Observation on 06/14/26 at 12:50 P.M. of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s hot water temperature from the bathroom faucet revealed the water was tepid to touch. Interview on 06/14/26 at 12:50 P.M. with Resident #70, the resident of room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the hot water was always cold.Observation on 06/14/26 at 12:55 P.M. of the hot water temperature from the bathroom faucet in room [ROOM NUMBER], occupied by Resident #21 and Resident #90, revealed the hot water was tepid to touch. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of involuntary seclusion. This affected one, (Resident #94) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 87.Findings include:Review of Former Resident #94's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included seizure disorder, autism spectrum disorder, aphasia, and cognitive impairment.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] and the Care Area Assessment (CAA) Trigger Summary dated 01/27/26 revealed the resident demonstrated severely impaired decision-making ability.Review of the Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was independently mobile and exhibited wandering and exit-seeking behaviors, requiring supervision and monitoring for safety.Review of facility-provided email communication revealed no documentation of the reported incident involving placement of a Hoyer lift in front of the resident's door.Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate transmission based precautions (TBP) were maintained for Residents #28 and #14. This had the potential to affect all 17 residents residing on the 100 hall. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure acceptable infection control practices were maintained while administering medications to Resident #36. This affected one resident (#36) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 08/29/22, with diagnoses including extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) resistance and a non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left lower leg. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #28's physician orders revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #52 was appropriately covered to maintain dignity and privacy. This affected one Resident (#52) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and depression. Record Review of Resident #52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, showering/bathing, and lower body dressing. Resident #52 required supervision or touching assistance for rolling left to right and partial/moderate assistance with lying to sitting. Observation on 06/29/25 at 2:29 P.M. of Resident #52 revealed the resident was sleeping on her right side in bed with her back to the open door. Resident #52's incontinence brief was fully…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to place a call light button in a location where Resident #16 was able to utilize the call light. This affected one resident (#16) out of seven residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (MS), pressure ulcer of sacral region stage four, type two diabetes mellitus, need for assistance with personal care, need for assistance with personal care, osteoarthritis, and other reduced mobility. Review of a care plan dated 02/25/25 revealed Resident #16 required the use of a soft touch call light. The care plan referenced Resident #16 needed his call light positioned near his head so he could turn it on when in bed. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was cognitive intact. Resident #16 was noted to have impairment on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care for one resident (#32) out of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 05/17/16. Medical diagnoses include dementia, cerebral infarction, hypertensive heart disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic pain, major depressive disorder, deaf and non-speaking, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #32 was noted to have impaired range of motion, required supervision for eating, and was dependent on staff for self-care and mobility. Review of the care plan dated 06/05/25 revealed a goal that Resident #32's ADL needs will be met through the next review date with listed interventions which included assisting the resident with shaving and nail…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of facility policy, and review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel recommendations, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent the development or decline of pressure ulcers were in place. This affected two residents (#16 and #228) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the annual survey. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #228 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, protein-calorie malnutrition, and altered mental status. Review of the care plan, dated 06/17/25, revealed Resident #228 was at risk for alteration in skin integrity. Interventions included pressure reduction boots as tolerated. Review of the physician order dated 06/26/25 revealed an order for prevalon boots (pressure reduction boots to offload pressure from a resident's heels) every shift. Observation on 06/29/25 at 11:24 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services to prevent the worsening of contractures were provided. This affected one resident (#23) out of four residents reviewed for limited range of motion. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 01/05/12. Medical diagnoses include myocardial infarction, contracture right hand, major depressive disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, legal blindness, deaf nonspeaking, and adult failure to thrive. Resident #23 utilized an American Sign Language (ASL) interpreter and utilized tactile signing for communication. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had a severe cognitive impairment and the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was unable to be completed. Resident #23 required supervision or touch assistance with self-care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding solution was administered at the rate ordered by the physician and failed to ensure placement and residual were verified prior to using Resident #228's gastrostomy tube. This affected one resident (#228) out of one resident reviewed for gastrostomy tubes. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #228 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, protein-calorie malnutrition, altered mental status, and encounter for gastrostomy tube. Review of the care plan, revised 06/27/25, revealed the resident had an alteration in nutrition and hydration. The resident was to have nothing by mouth and received 100 percent of calories through tube feeding. a. Review of the physicians order, dated 06/26/25, revealed the resident was to be administered Isosource 1.5 (a tube feeding formula) at a rate of 65 milliliters (ml)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%). The facility had seven errors out of 37 opportunities for a medication error rate of 18.9%. This affected one resident (#228) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #228's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/14/22 with diagnoses that included gastrostomy status, hypertension, cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, convulsions, dysphagia and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #228's clinical physician orders, dated 06/26/25, revealed the resident had orders for Keppra Oral Solution (an anticonvulsant) 100 milligrams (mg) per milliliter (ml), give 5 ml via gastrostomy tube twice daily, Senna (laxative) 8.6 mg tablet, give one tablet via gastrostomy tube twice daily, Lisinopril (an antihypertensive) 20 mg tablet, give one tablet via gastrostomy tube once daily, Clopidogrel bisulfate (an antiplatelet) 75 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were not administered unnecessarily for two residents (#17 and #26) out of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 01/22/21 and diagnoses including Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), chronic kidney disease, urinary retention, obstructive uropathy, and neurogenic bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 annual assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The assessment also noted Resident #26 had an indwelling catheter, frequent incontinence, impaired mobility, and was dependent for many activities of daily living. Review of the physician orders for Resident #26 revealed an order dated 12/10/24 for Cephalexin (an antibiotic)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI's), medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an incident of potential sexual abuse was timely reported to the Administrator and to the state agency. This affected two residents (#36 and #67) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 12/02/18 with diagnoses including hemiplegia affecting left side, adjustment disorder with anxiety, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, deaf, dysphagia, and history of unspecified adult abuse. Review of Resident #36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/17/17 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, type two diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, sleep disorder, mild…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI's), medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an incident of potential sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated. This affected two residents (#36 and #67) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the SRI created 12/24/24 at 8:33 A.M. revealed on 12/22/24 at 11:45 P.M. the night shift nurse found Resident #67 lying in Resident #36's bed on top of the covers with his pants down. Resident #36 was dressed and under the blankets. Resident #67 got out of bed and was directed out of the room. During subsequent interviews Resident #36 reported she was touched on the breast, but no sexual penetration took place. She reported she had been okay with it at the time but did not want it to happen again. Resident #67 was unable to be interviewed due to his cognition at the time but was moved to another hallway. Review of the facility investigation revealed it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, this facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked at all times unless in use and under direct observation of the medication administration personnel. This had the potential to affect all 26 residents who were noted to be mobile on the 300 and 500 unit. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Observation on 08/28/24 at 8:15 A.M. of Registered Nurse (RN) #34 completing medication administration for residents who resided on the 500 unit revealed this units medication cart was noted to be unlocked and RN #34 was not in view of this medication cart and was noted to be in a residents room. Observation completed on 08/28/24 at 8:39 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #160 administer morning medication revealed there was a medication that was not available in the 300 unit medication cart. LPN #160 was noted to leave the 300 unit medication cart unlocked and walk away from the cart to a different facility unit to obtained the needed medication from the facility's medication storage room. During this time,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, medication administration observation, staff interviews, and medication administration policy review, the facility failed to ensure an medication error rate of 5% or less when medication that was noted to be delayed release was crushed, or capsule were opened during administration. Medication error rate was 9%. This affected two residents (Resident #6, and #32) of the four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 74. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 04/23/21. Diagnoses included dementia, depression, and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #32's quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15 indicating an severely impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Review of the plan of care dated 06/26/23 revealed Resident #32 uses antidepressant medication related to depression and weight loss.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medication administration observation, staff interview and facility policy review, this facility failed to ensure infection control measures were maintained during medication administration. This affected two residents (Resident #32 and #42) out of the four residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 04/23/21. Diagnoses included dementia, depression, and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #32's quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15 indicating an severely impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Review of the plan of care dated 06/26/23 revealed Resident #32 uses antidepressant medication related to depression and weight loss. Resident is at risk for complications related to antidepressant medication including, dry mucous, constipation, urinary retention,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain effective pest management. This had the potential to affect all 83 residents. Findings include: Observation on 01/02/24 at 8:39 A.M. in the kitchen under the dishwasher revealed two live cockroaches. Director of Dietary #115 verified the cockroaches at the time of the discovery, and verbalized seeing cockroaches occasionally. Observation on 01/02/24 at 10:26 A.M. in Resident #17 room revealed two live cockroaches on Resident #17's bathroom counter where one toothbrush was laying uncovered. Director of Maintenance #269 verified the pests at the time of the discovery. Interview on 01/02/24 at 10:26 A.M. with Director of Maintenance #269 confirmed they have had an outbreak of cockroaches in the kitchen, 200's and 300's hall. Observation on 01/02/24 at 10:35 A.M. in Resident #10 room revealed one live cockroach on the bathroom counter. State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #128 verified the pests at the time of discovery, stating the pests were everywhere. Observation on 01/04/24 at 10:21 A.M. of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate to reflect resident care needs. This affected two (Resident #23 and #42) of 21 residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 06/13/2023. Diagnosis included malignant neoplasm of the oropharynx, dysphagia, gastrostomy status, and vascular dementia. Review of the plan of care dated 06/14/23 and revised 12/18/23 revealed Resident #23 had a potential nutritional and/or hydration problem related to the diagnosis of tube feed dependence, receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). Interventions included to provide tube feeding, flushes, and supplement as ordered. Review of Resident #23's quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 indicating the resident had severely impaired cognition for daily decision making…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) were accurate regarding resident mental health diagnoses. This affected one (Resident #61) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an initial admission date of 09/26/18 with the diagnoses including starvation, psychosis, adult failure to thrive, congestive heart failure (CHF), non-compliance with medical treatment regimen, dementia with behavioral disturbances, delusional disorder, paranoid personality disorder, altered mental status, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), visual hallucinations, hypertension, vitamin B deficiency, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, glaucoma, auditory hallucinations, constipation and insomnia. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. The assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the preadmission screening and record review (PASRR) assessment and referral for level II services were completed. This affected one (Resident #81) of two residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 83. Findings Include: Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were spinal stenosis, muscle weakness, cervical disc disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, generalized anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, osteoarthritis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, deaf nonspeaking, legal blindness, chronic kidney disease, depression, and insomnia. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/25/23, revealed he had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #81 PASRR document and determination letter, dated 08/11/23, revealed he was approved for short term nursing stay, starting 08/22/23, for 90 days; which would end on 11/20/23. Review of the remainder of his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the state mental health agency of significant changes in a resident's mental/physical health condition. This affected one (Resident #61) of two Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents reviewed. The census was 83. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an initial admission date of 09/26/18 with the diagnoses including starvation, psychosis, adult failure to thrive, congestive heart failure (CHF), non-compliance with medical treatment regimen, dementia with behavioral disturbances, delusional disorder, paranoid personality disorder, altered mental status, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), visual hallucinations, hypertension, vitamin B deficiency, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, glaucoma, auditory hallucinations, constipation and insomnia. Review of the significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a self-releasing wheelchair seatbelt was only used during transportation to workshop for Resident #1. This affected one resident (Resident #1) of one residents reviewed for transportation devices. Findings Include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's admitting diagnoses included intellectual disabilities, type two diabetes, and impaired communication. Further review revealed Resident #1 required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. Review of Resident #1's signed physician orders revealed Resident #1 may attend workshop on Mondays and Wednesdays. Further review revealed Resident #1 received transportation to workshop on Mondays and Wednesdays and the resident must be ready 15 minutes prior to pick up time. Review of an email dated 07/12/21 from the administrator for the transport…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow a physician ordered fluid restriction for Resident #55, who received hemodialysis to promote optimal cardiac and renal outcomes for the resident. The facility also failed to ensure dialysis communication forms were accessible to facility staff for review and reference. This affected one resident (#55) of one resident reviewed for hemodialysis/hydration. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an initial admission date of 03/24/23 and a re-entry date of 11/10/2023. Diagnosis included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and heart disease. Review of the plan of care dated 03/27/23 and revised 12/22/23 revealed Resident #55 had a potential for nutritional and/or hydration problem related to type two diabetes, end stage renal disease/hemodialysis, coronary artery disease, depression, anxiety, cerebral infarction, need for therapeutic diet with fluctuating anticipated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication monitoring was completed for the use of antipsychotic medications. This affected one resident (Residents #70) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses including depression, hallucinations, schizophrenia, and high blood pressure. Further review revealed Resident #70 required staff assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) task completion and medication administration. Review of Resident #70's signed physician orders revealed an order dated 04/21/21 for the use of the antipsychotic medication Risperdal one milligram (mg) given daily at bedtime related to schizophrenia. Review of Resident #70's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated December 2023 revealed Risperdal was administered per physician order. Review of Resident #70's quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#32) physician ordered laboratory tests were completed as ordered. This affected one of 11 residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the latest readmission of 08/18/23. Her diagnoses included encephalopathy, need for assistance with personal care, displaced subtrochanteric fracture of right femur, vitamin D deficiency, major depressive disorder, deaf nonspeaking, type II diabetes, mild intellectual disabilities, secondary malignant neoplasm of the breast, acquired absence of left breast and nipple and anxiety disorder. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. Review of the physician progress note dated 11/30/23, authored by Physician #502 revealed the physician was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were not served food past the use-by date. This had the potential to affect 82 of 82 residents who receive food from the facility kitchen. One resident (Resident #23) receives nothing by mouth. The census was 83. Findings include: Observation in the facility kitchen on 01/02/24 from 8:39 A.M. to 9:23 A.M. revealed 102 cartons of 1% milk in the walk-in refrigerator that had a use by date of 01/01/24. Interview with Director of Dietary #115 on 01/02/24 at 9:14 A.M. confirmed the milk was past the use by date, and stated she thought the facility had a seven day look back policy on milk. Director of Dietary #115 confirmed the intent to use the milk past the use- by date. Interview with Director of Dietary #115 on 01/04/24 at 2:30 P.M. confirmed the facility did not have a policy for a look-back period on milk.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain hospice documentation on-site for resident care. This affected one resident (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, hyperkalemia, depression, anxiety disorder, lumbar spina bifida, acquired absence of right and left leg above knee, and glaucoma. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/14/23, revealed she had a significant cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #2's medical records revealed the facility had no hospice notes or orders on site for her. The hospice notes provided to the survey team on 01/08/24 had a fax date of 01/08/24, indicating all the hospice notes were sent to the facility on that day. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #176 on 01/08/24 at 1:07 P.M. confirmed the facility did not have any hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence of education and administration of pneumonia immunizations. This affected two residents (Resident #35 and #84) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 83. 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, high blood pressure, and chronic venous ulcer to lower left leg. Resident #35 required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. Review of Resident #35's immunization record revealed Resident #35 declined the Covid-19 immunization, the influenza immunization, and the annual Tuberculosis health questionnaire on 10/04/23. Interview on 01/08/24 at 11:30 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility did not have information on when Resident #35 would have received any previous pneumonia immunizations. The DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy and procedure review and interview facility failed to properly store food items in the dry storage, refrigerator and freezer locations to prevent contamination, spoilage or food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 86 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 01/24/22 at 10:22 A.M. observation of the facility kitchen revealed in the dry storage area there was a large bag of dried noodles that had previously been opened that was tied and undated. There was an opened bag of butterscotch baking chips undated, bags of dry spiral pasta and elbow noodles that were open and undated, two bags of gravy mix were that were undated and a container with instant mash potatoes had a secured lid on it with no date. On 01/24/22 at 10:32 A.M. observation of the walk in refrigerator revealed a block of butter was uncovered and undated, three packs of yellow and white cheese slices were wrapped up and undated. A bag of shredded cheese was opened and undated and a large plastic tub with a lid on it was unlabeled and undated. A tray of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility census review, review of the Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC) guidance, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure N95 masks were worn properly/correctly by staff working on the facility COVID-19 unit to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the facility. This affected two staff (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #203 and State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #116 who were assigned to care for the 11 residents who resided on the COVID-19 unit and had the potential to affect all 86 residents residing in the facility as these staff could also work in other (non-COVID) areas of the facility. Findings include: On 01/24/22 review of the facility census and observation of the facility revealed a designated COVID-19 unit with a census of 11 residents on the unit who were in isolation for COVID-19. On 01/24/22 at 12:30 P.M. LPN #203 was observed on the COVID-19 unit wearing an N95 mask over top of a surgical mask. The lower elastic strap of the N95 mask was hanging below LPN #203's chin. LPN #203 was observed entering and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were weighed or re-weighed timely to identify/confirm weight loss or significant weight changes and/or failed to provide fluids to Resident #35 who needed/requested them. This affected four residents (#50, #75, #34 and #387) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition and one resident (#35) of two residents reviewed for hydration. Findings include: 1. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, sensorineural hearing loss, hypertension, obesity, hyperlipidemia, lymphedema, atherosclerotic heart disease, iron deficiency, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, type II diabetes, anemia, hypothyroidism. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, section C, dated 12/07/21 revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-31 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, review of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) information, review of a HealthDay News Study and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to provide adequate justification for the use of antibiotics as a preventative measure for COVID-19. This affected six residents (#14, #33, #35, #49, #57 and #67) of six residents prescribed antibiotics. Findings include: Review of Resident #14, #33, #35, #49, #57 and #67's medical records, dated from 12/30/21 to 01/14/22 revealed the residents were treated with Azithromax (an antibiotic medication used to treat infection) or Cipro (an antibiotic medication used to treat infection) after testing positive for COVID-19. On 01/25/22 at 1:11 P.M. interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the residents were prescribed antibiotics after testing positive for COVID-19. The DON failed to provide any other evidence these residents met any type of criteria for the antibiotic use. Review of information on the FDA website (https://www.fda.gov) revealed the following FDA response to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. On 01/27/22 from 11:00 A.M. to 11:05 A.M. an environmental tour of the 200 hallway was conducted with the Administrator. The following concerns were observed and verified with the Administrator at the time of the observations: The bathroom wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] beside the commode had exposed and missing drywall. There were rust stains around the commode was well as black stains on the floor. The bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] had cracked tile on the floor, rust stains around the commode as well as black stains on the floor. The floor under a fall mat in room [ROOM NUMBER] had a red wet liquid under the mat that had been present since initial observations on 01/26/22. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional and sanitary environment for all residents. The facility also failed to maintain resident equipment in good repair for Resident #67 and Resident #38. This affected two residents (#38 and #67) and three of the four hallways in the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to provide Resident #35 with dignity and respect related to the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one resident (#35) of four residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 03/19/18 with the latest readmission of 05/29/19. Resident #35 had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, personal history of COVID-19, dementia, ataxia, dysphagia, degenerative disc of lumbar region, anemia, urinary retention, urinary tract infection (UTI), scoliosis, hypertension, major depressive disorder, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and deafness. Review of the plan of care, dated 03/20/18 revealed the resident had a suprapubic catheter related to BPH with lower urinary tract symptoms, bladder spasms and had minimal urinary output. Interventions included catheter care with rounds and as needed, empty and report output to nursing every shift, irrigate catheter with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #387, who presented with communication difficulties was able to adequately and effectively communicate needs with staff and staff were able to communicate with resident through the use of an interpreter, communication board or other effective measures. This affected one resident (#387) of three residents reviewed for communication. Findings include: Record review for Resident #387 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerosis of native arteries of right leg with ulceration of other part of foot, COVID-19, pain in unspecified foot, hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Review of the resident's initial nursing assessment, dated 12/29/21 revealed a communication board should be used when communicating with the resident. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/14/22 revealed Resident #387 was cognitively intact with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #8, who required staff assistance from staff for personal hygiene received timely and adequate assistance with shaving to maintain proper grooming and hygiene. This affected one resident (#8) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/01/18 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, cerebral infarction, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, glaucoma, cardiomegaly, diabetes mellitus, anoxic brain damage, hypertension, anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, congestive heart failure and unspecified malignant neoplasm. Review of the plan of care, dated 08/02/18 revealed the resident had a self-care deficit related to dementia, edema, incontinence, hypertension, depression and natural progression of disease process. Interventions included one to two person assist with activities of daily living/care as needed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments and monitor non-pressure related skin impairment/wounds for Resident #62 and Resident #387. This affected two residents (#62 and #387) of three residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including gas gangrene, type one diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, chronic kidney disease stage three, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, acquired absence of left leg below knee, acute osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, and acquired absence of other right toes. Review of Resident #62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 11/04/21 revealed the resident had intact cognition and was at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Review of the plan of care, dated 11/09/21 revealed the resident was at risk for alteration to skin integrity related to gas gangrene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #35's indwelling urinary catheter was properly positioned to prevent backflow of urine and possible urinary tract infections and failed to provide catheter and perineal care in a manner to decrease the risk of urinary tract infections. The facility also failed to ensure a urinalysis and culture and sensitivity were obtained timely as ordered for Resident #42 who was symptomatic of a urinary tract infection. This affected one resident (#35) of one resident reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter use and one resident (#42) of five residents reviewed for infections. The facility identified two residents with indwelling urinary catheters. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 03/19/18 with the latest readmission of 05/29/19. Resident #35 had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, personal history of COVID-19,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to review or complete pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for Resident #38, Resident #54 and Resident #72. This affected three residents (#38, #54 and #72) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 12/20/17 with diagnoses including moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, deaf non-speaking, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, unspecified open-angle glaucoma, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, cerebral infarction, major depression, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Review of a pharmacist recommendation, dated 07/20/21 revealed a recommendation for a review of a gradual dose reduction (GDR) related to the resident receiving antipsychotic medications, including Abilify 2.5 milligrams (mg), Citalopram 10 mg, Mirtazapine 15 mg and Trazodone 25 mg. Review of the medical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) psychoactive medication for Resident #54 was limited to 14 days or continued only with an evaluation by the physician or certified nurse practitioner (CNP) for the appropriateness of continued use. This affected one resident (#54) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 08/16/21 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, emphysema, osteoarthritis, foot drop and anxiety. Review of physician's orders revealed an order, dated 09/03/21 for the psychoactive, anti-anxiety medication Lorazepam (Ativan) 0.5 milligrams (mg) one tablet every four hours as needed (PRN). A pharmacy recommendation, dated 11/23/21 identified the resident had a PRN order for Lorazepam medication for more than 14 days without a reasoning or an end date. The pharmacy recommendation to discontinue the medication or provide a reason/rationale for continued use was not addressed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. The facility medication error rate was calculated to be 5.88 percent and included two medication errors of 34 medication administration opportunities. This affected one resident (#387) of seven residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: Record review for Resident #387 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerosis of native arteries of right leg with ulceration of other part of foot, COVID-19, pain in unspecified foot, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician's orders, dated 12/30/21, revealed an order for Humalog solution 100 unit (insulin Lispro (Human) to be given before meals (for diabetes) per sliding scale. If the resident's blood sugar was 151 to 200 give one unit, for blood sugar 201 to 250 give two units for blood sugar 251 to 300…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-07-01 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure daily staffing information was posted for residents and visitors to view. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Observation on 06/29/25 at 9:20 A.M. revealed no daily staffing information was posted in the facility for residents and visitors to view. Observation and interview with the Administrator on 06/29/25 at 9:22 A.M. confirmed there was the previous day's schedule in the plastic holder located at the entrance desk of the facility. The Administrator confirmed it was the staffing schedule for 06/28/25 and the schedule for the current day 06/29/25 should have been in the plastic holder on display.
- No harm found · C2022-01-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, facility policy and procedure review and staff interview the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property policies and procedures including checking references as part of the screening process for newly hired staff. This had the potential to affect all 86 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the employee personnel files revealed no evidence the facility attempted to obtain information from previous employers and/or current employers as part of the required screening process for new employees. The following personnel files were reviewed: Unit Manager #300 who was hired on 12/27/21 Receptionist #131 who was hired on 12/09/21. Dietary Staff #128 who was hired on 10/29/21. State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #102 who was hired on 09/07/21. STNA #150 who was hired on 09/07/21. On 01/26/22 at 12:30 P.M. interview with Human Resources #195 confirmed the facility did not have evidence to support reference checks were completed as part of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$169,562 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $169,562 — penalty dated 2024-02-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 4.1 | -3.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLLERAN FAM TR DATED 01-01-2018 | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/31/2024 |
| COLLERAN, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
| KRYSTOWSKI, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
| FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2024 |
| LAUGHMAN, TAYLOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
| CANOWITZ, STEPHEN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365421. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.