Bennington Glen Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 70.8 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.83 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.51 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.97 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility's investigation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6 received adequate supervision and assistance with toileting to prevent the resident from falling. Actual Harm occurred on 03/21/26 when Resident #6 was not adequately supervised in the bathroom, was left on the toilet while Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #41 went to get new bedding and an adult brief, and Resident #6 got herself off the toilet and was coming out of the door when CNA #41 came in and saw Resident #6 fall backwards hitting her back and head on the sink, sustaining serious physical harm and injuries and was subsequently hospitalized related to rib fractures to her left seven through eleventh left ribs, a small left hemopneumothorax (accumulation of air and blood in the pleural cavity commonly caused by trauma), an acute left T9 transverse process fracture (a break in the small bony projection on the side of the ninth thoracic vertebra), and hematomas to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to timely address a resident's request for accommodation of mobility needs. This affected one (Resident #7) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 68. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 08/01/22. Diagnoses included contracture, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of the knee, and age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture.Review of the nursing progress notes revealed on 02/14/26 at 8:40 P.M., Resident #7 was lowered to the floor by staff during a transfer. The fall investigation revealed Resident #7 was lowered to the floor during a staff transfer due to the wheelchair rolling backward during transfer. The fall investigation revealed staff did lock the wheelchair but the wheelchair moved during the transfer.The nursing progress note revealed on 02/28/26 at 1:01 P.M., Resident #7 refused a shower after four attempts and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-04-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, medical record review, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, the facility failed to adequately assess the activity preferences of a resident and met the needs and preference of the resident. This affected one (#6) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 68.Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/04/25. Diagnoses included dementia, periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic of left hip joint and fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, depression, age-related macular degeneration, osteoarthritis, and sensorineural hearing loss. Resident #6 had a niece and daughters listed as emergency contacts.Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Score (BIMS) of six indicating she had severely impaired cognition. Resident #6 was interviewed for activity preferences and it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was timely notified of the resident's, who were weighed several times a week due to a diagnosis of congestive heart failure, excess weight gain. This affected two (#19 and #45) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 68.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/18/25 with diagnoses including chronic heart failure (CHF). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had intact cognition.Review of Resident #19's care plan dated 09/19/25 revealed the resident had the potential for alteration in nutrition and hydration related to her diagnoses including CHF. Interventions included expected weight fluctuations related to CHF and weights according to protocol.Review of Resident #19's physician note dated 04/09/26 revealed the resident had heart failure and was complaining of having shortness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's do not crust list, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was less than five percent (%). There were four medication errors out of 34 opportunities resulting in a 11.76% medication error rate. This affected one (Resident #68) of five residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 68.Findings include:Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/25/18. Diagnoses included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, polyosteoarthritis, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) without esophagitis.Review of Resident #68's physician orders revealed on 04/01/26, Metoprolol Succinate extended release (ER) (treats high blood pressure) oral tablet 24-hour 25 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth one time a day; and Metoprolol Succinate ER oral tablet 24-hour 50 mg give one tablet by mouth one time a day for a total of 75 mg daily. On 12/04/24, an order for Pantoprazole Sodium (treats GERD) tablet delayed release 20 mg one time daily. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to have accurate medical record documentation for Residents #17. The affected one (#17) of 26 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy. The facility census was 68.Findings include:Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/15/21. Diagnoses included hypothyroidism.Review of Resident #17's physician orders revealed an order for Synthroid oral tablet 175 micrograms (mcg) administer one tablet one time a day related to hypothyroidism.Review of Resident #17's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed no documentation for Resident #17's Synthroid oral tablet 175 mcg on 04/10/26, 04/11/26, 04/14/26, 04/15/26, and 04/16/26.The medical record did not reveal the reason why the Synthroid medication was not documented in the MAR.Interview on 04/22/2026 at 8:25 A.M. with Regional Registered Nurse #450 confirmed there was no documentation in the medical record regarding why Synthroid was not documented in Resident #17's MAR.This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's toothbrushes were stored in a manner to maintain infection control. This affected two (#11 and #37) of 26 residents observed for infection control. The facility census was 68.Findings include:Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/29/25. Diagnoses included dysarthria and anarthria, demyelinating disease of central nervous system, and muscle weakness.Review of the Activity of Daily Living care plan dated 08/17/25 revealed Resident #37 required assistance with oral hygiene.Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/04/21. Diagnoses included dementia, chronic respiratory failure and unilateral post-traumatic osteoarthritis of first carpometacarpal joint of the left hand.Review of the Activity of Daily Living care plan dated 08/17/25 revealed Resident #11 required assistance with oral hygiene.Review of the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic stewardship was followed for Resident #7. This affected one (#7) of four residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. The facility census was 68. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 08/01/22. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease.Review of the progress note revealed that on 02/26/26, Resident #7 reported burning with urination and a urine culture and sensitivity (C&S) was ordered. On 02/27/26, the urine specimen was collected that morning.Review of the urine culture results dated 02/28/26 revealed greater than 100,000 colonies per milliliter gram-negative bacilli, 10,000 to 50,000 colonies per milliliter Proteus species, and additional flora indicative of probable vaginal or urethral contamination. The report further indicated that three or more organisms were present, suggesting contamination, and stated that susceptibility testing was not recommended for contaminated urine specimens.Review of the physician orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were completed timely and as required. This affected nine residents (#14, #15, #23, #27, #30, #47, #52, #56, and #60) of 36 residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility census was 74. Findings include 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/04/21. Diagnoses included dementia. Review of Resident #14's MDS assessments revealed a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] was in progress. Resident #14's prior quarterly assessment was dated 06/01/24. The resident's MDS tab in her electronic medical record indicated the assessment was overdue. An interview on 10/22/24 at 2:54 P.M. with MDS Coordinator #393 confirmed the quarterly assessment for Resident #14 was incomplete and not completed timely. 2. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/25/18. Diagnoses included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was an appropriate smooth texture prior to serving residents on a pureed diet. This had the potential to affect five residents (Residents #4, #19, #29, #34, #172) who were on a prescribed pureed diet. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Interview on 10/22/24 at 10:03 A.M. with Dietary [NAME] (DC) #344 stated she wanted the puree textures at a mashed potato consistency. DC #344 stated when the puree texture was complete, it was like baby food, which was smooth with no chunks. DC #344 said she tastes her puree food, and a resident should not have to chew a puree food item. DC #344 said there were six residents on a puree diet. DC #344 stated she was going to puree chicken enchiladas, peppers and onions, and mashed potatoes for lunch that day (10/22/24). Observation and interview on 10/22/24 at 10:08 A.M. revealed DC #344 started the chicken enchilada puree. DC #344 said the puree was done at 10:09 A.M. Observation of the puree revealed it looked chunky. DC #344 then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, medical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to properly do contact tracing or implement broad-based testing when staff and residents tested positive for COVID-19. The facility also failed to offer Resident #3 another room (if available) when roommate tested positive for COVID-19, and Resident #3 was not tested in a timely manner while exhibiting symptoms of COVID-19. This affected 14 Residents (#3, #6, #22, #23, #33, #35, #60, #63, #121, #171, #173, #279, #280, and #500). The facility census was 74 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility COVID-19 tracking information revealed the following positive COVID-20 cases in 27 days. On 09/26/24, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #305 tested positive for COVID-19. No tracking was provided for CNA #305. On 10/01/24. Contracted Therapy/CNA #600 tested positive for COVID-19. Residents #37, #41, #44, #52, #53 #171, #174, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $286K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH