Tuscany Gardens
7400 Hazelton Etna Road SW, Pataskala, OH 43062 · For profit - Corporation · 123 certified beds · (740) 964-0803 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.6% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 31.6% | 30.1% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.3% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.5% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.2% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.3% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.40 | 1.73 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.36 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.4%CMS range 52.1–68.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.9–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 78.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.4–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.87 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 106.3 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview with staff, the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained during medication administration for Residents #21, #52, #77, #84, #85, and #88. This affected six residents (#21, #52, #77, #84, #85, and #88) of 14 observed for medication administration. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of 01/05/26 and diagnoses of diabetes, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care, high blood pressure, constipation, and congestive heart failure. Observation of medication administration on 03/13/26 at 11:35 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse #201 prepared medication at the medication cart outside the room of Resident #85. She proceeded to go into the room of Resident #85 without locking the screen of the computer leaving personal health information for Resident #85 in view for anyone to see. The information in view included the residents name, room number, diagnoses and medications. On 03/13/26 at 11:44 A.M. an interview with Registered Nurse #201 verified she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with staff, the facility failed to ensure the medication carts were locked when unattended. This had the potential to affect 9 (#17, #34, #40, #50, #57, #59, #63, #87, and #93) cognitively impaired and independently mobile residents, on the 200 and 300 halls, identified during the survey. Findings Include: 1. Observation of medication administration on 03/13/26 at 11:35 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse #201 prepared medication at the medication cart outside the room of Resident #85. She proceeded to go into the room of Resident #85 without locking the medication cart.On 03/13/26 at 11:44 A.M. an interview with Registered Nurse #201 verified she had not locked the medication cart.2. Observation of medication administration on 03/13/26 at 11:42 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse #201 prepared medication at the medication cart outside the room of Resident #77. She proceeded to go into the room of Resident #77 without locking the medication cart. On 03/13/26 at 11:44 A.M. an interview with Registered Nurse #201 verified she had not locked the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the medical record, review of the Controlled Drug record, and interview with the staff, the facility failed to ensure the Controlled Drug record and the narcotic count were maintained to identify the actual doses of oxycodone/acetaminophen (a controlled narcotic medication) in the facility and failed to ensure staff did not pre-pour narcotic medication prior to administration for Resident #9. This affected one Resident (#9) of 14 observed for medication administration.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included mood disorder, bipolar disorder, anemia, diabetes, mild cognitive impairment, chronic pain, dementia, insomnia, cataracts, absence of a spleen, and follicular disorder.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had intact cognition.Review of Resident #9's physician orders revealed an order dated 07/18/25 for oxycodone acetaminophen 10/325 milligrams…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control during administration of tube feed medications for Resident #15. This affected one resident (Resident #15) of 14 observed during medication administration.Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, hypothyroidism, gastrostomy, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, hallucinations, schizoaffective disorder, adult failure to thrive, and dementia.Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had severely impaired cognition and had a feeding tube.Observation of tube feed medication administration on 03/13/26 at 9:58 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #202 went into the room of Resident #15, obtained the graduated container and syringe (the syringe was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to change and date oxygen tubing and supplies as ordered and failed to store respiratory equipment in a safe and sanitary manner. This affected four residents (#38, #44, #71, #82) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 99.Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an initial admission date of 05/02/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary embolism, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, osteoarthritis, constipation, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the plan of care dated 05/12/25 revealed the resident has a respiratory deficiencies or abnormalities of pulmonary function related to COPD, history of respiratory failure and oxygen use. Interventions included administer oxygen as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper food storage, labeling, and staff hygiene in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect 93 out of 99 residents residing in the facility, with six residents on nothing by mouth (NPO) diets. The facility census was 99.Findings include:Observation on 09/15/25 from 8:28 A.M. to 8:46 A.M. revealed that in the freezer there was open frozen corn on the cob that was undated, and opened frozen carrots that were undated. In the refrigerator, there was an open strawberry yogurt that was undated, open shredded lettuce that was undated, open shredded cheese that was undated, and open shredded mozzarella cheese with an open date of 08/05/25. In the dry storage area, there was opened spaghetti with an unreadable open date and opened orzo that was undated. Additionally, Dietary Personnel #550 and Dietary Personnel #521 were observed to have hats on with exposed hair coming out of the hat from a ponytail that was not contained in the hat or a hair net.Interview on 09/15/25 at 8:46 A.M. with Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light was positioned within reach of one resident. This affected one (Resident #60) of one resident observed for call light placement. The facility census was 99.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 09/04/24. Diagnoses included but not limited to sepsis, atrial fibrillation, paranoid schizophrenia, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia, mild cognitive impairment, depression, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, acute respiratory failure, retention of urine, signs and symptoms concerning food and fluid intake, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, primary hypertension, abnormalities of gait and mobility.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/03/25, revealed the Resident #60 had moderate cognitive impairment. The resident was assessed to require assistance on staff for all his activities of daily living (ADL). In addition, the resident was identified as having a foley…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident preferences were followed for medication administration. This affected one (Resident #103) out of one resident reviewed for choices. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #103 revealed an admission date of 06/19/25 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, Parkinson's disease, progressive supranuclear ophthalmoplegia, vitamin d deficiency, falls and hypertension. Review of physician order dated 06/20/25 revealed aspirin 81 milligram (mg) chewable oral tablet, given once daily by mouth for preventative, amlodipine besylate 5 mg oral tablet, given once daily for hypertension, magnesium oxide 400 mg oral tablet, given once daily for cramps and spasms, vitamin D3 125 micrograms (mcg) oral capsule, given once daily as a supplement, and propranolol 10 mg oral tablet every eight hours for hypertension. Review of care plan dated 07/01/25 revealed Resident #103 may require assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) interventions include requires assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the signed advanced directive for Resident #4 was correct. This affected one (Resident #4) out of three residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 99. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 12/13/23 with diagnoses that included unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease unspecified, and unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction.Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #4 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 out of 15, indicating impaired cognition. Review of the advanced directive for Resident #4 in the medical record revealed it was dated 12/18/23 for Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care-Arrest (DNRCC-A) and Do Not Intubate (DNI). In the electronic medical record, the advanced directive was listed as DNRCC, and the orders were for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview ,record review and facility policy, the facility failed to have appropriate diagnosis to support the use of antipsychotic medication for residents and failed to complete labs per pharmacy recommendations and per physician orders. This affected three (Resident #11, Resident #13, and Resident #14) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 99. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 03/30/23 with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or know physiological condition, insomnia, anxiety and major depressive disorder.Review of care plan dated 03/30/23 revealed resident is at risk for adverse effects related to psychoactive medication use: antipsychotic for psychotic disorder unspecified. Interventions include assess behaviors for which drugs are being given, assess for adverse effects, assess for non-drug approaches to deal with behaviors, give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 and Resident #99 had accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected two (Resident #4 and #99) of 34 medical records reviewed. The facility census was 99.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an initial admission date of 12/13/23 with the latest readmission date of 06/22/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, depression, anxiety, congestive heart failure, cerebral infarct, pressure ulcer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the plan of care dated 06/16/25 revealed the resident had an alteration in skin integrity as evidenced by pressure ulcer to left buttocks. Interventions included assess area for size, color, drainage weekly and as needed, assess condition of skin/dressings as needed, assess for pain and provide treatment per physician order, body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely follow-up for Resident #6's level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation. This affected one (Resident #6) out of one resident reviewed for PASARRs. The facility census was 99.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 08/05/24 with diagnoses that included paraplegia, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, injury of urethra, schizoaffective disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #6 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition.Review of the medical record chart for Resident #6 revealed the PASARR indicated the need for a level II evaluation, but there was no documented evaluation or attempt in the medical chart for the level II evaluation.Interview on 09/16/25 at 3:35 P.M. with Social Worker (SW) #583 verified that another staff member,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan addressing Resident #8's contractures. This affected one (Resident #8) out of nine residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 99.Findings include:Review of the medical record chart for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 01/22/22 with diagnoses that included type II diabetes, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, secondary parkinsonism, stiffness of unspecified joint, and schizoaffective disorder.Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09 out of 15, indicating impaired cognition. The assessment documented that the resident had impairments in both upper extremities and was maximally dependent for upper extremity dressing. The resident was also dependent on staff for rolling left and right in bed and required assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate Activities of daily living (ADL) care for resident's dependent on staff. This affected two (Residents #8 and #70) out of 9 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 01/10/22 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09 out of 15, indicating impaired cognition. The assessment documented that the resident had impairments on both upper extremities, was dependent on staff for personal care tasks including eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, and dressing, and was dependent for rolling and transfers. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospice record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure hospice information, including the hospice certification and plan of care for certification was up to date and available at the facility. This affected one resident (#44) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 99. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary embolism, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, osteoarthritis, constipation, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the plan of care dated [DATE] revealed the resident received hospice services for end stage chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Interventions included follow physician's orders and Resident's advanced directives, hospice services as ordered,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess pressure ulcers/injury upon admission/readmission to the facility. This affected two residents (#2 and #4) of seven residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 99.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an initial admission date of 02/02/24 with the latest readmission date of 06/30/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to acute myocardial infarction, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, anxiety disorder, depression, sleep apnea, pressure ulcer, sick sinus syndrome, obstructive and reflux uropathy and gastrostomy status. Review of the plan care dated 04/15/25 revealed the resident had an alteration in skin integrity as evidenced by a pressure ulcer to the coccyx. Interventions included assess area for size, color, drainage weekly and as needed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor and provide timely follow-up for Resident #8's bilateral wrist contractures. This affected one (Resident #8) out of two residents reviewed for mobility and range of motion. The facility census was 99.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 01/10/22 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, secondary parkinsonism, stiffness of joint, and schizoaffective disorder.Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09 out of 15, reflecting impaired cognition. The MDS documented dependency on staff for personal care including eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, and dressing, and full or partial dependence for transfers, rolling, and mobility. The resident's care plan did not address management of bilateral wrist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, medical record review to include hospital records, progress notes, and urology notes, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly and safely maintain urinary catheters to include the timely address of urology recommendations for one resident's suprapubic catheter. This affected two residents (#60 and #81) of six residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 99.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 09/04/24. Diagnoses included but not limited to sepsis, A-fib, paranoid schizophrenia, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia, mild cognitive impairment, depression, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, acute respiratory failure, retention of urine, s/s concerning food and fluid intake, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, primary hypertension, abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/03/25, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided adaptive equipment to promote independence with eating. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure food residents disliked were not served to residents. This affected one resident (#79) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 99.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an initial admission date of 10/16/19 with the latest readmission of 11/30/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral palsy, chronic respiratory failure, chronic pain syndrome, protein calorie malnutrition, anemia, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and neuropathy. Review of the plan of care dated 10/25/19 revealed the resident had the potential for alteration in nutrition and hydration related to malnutrition, dysphagia, cerebral palsy, history of gastrointestinal bleed and anxiety. Interventions included adaptive equipment as ordered, honor food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interviews and review of resident meal ticket, the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of one resident. This affected one resident (#79) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 99.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an initial admission date of 10/16/19 with the latest readmission of 11/30/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral palsy, chronic respiratory failure, chronic pain syndrome, protein calorie malnutrition, anemia, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and neuropathy. Review of the plan of care dated 10/25/19 revealed the resident had the potential for alteration in nutrition and hydration related to malnutrition, dysphagia, cerebral palsy, history of gastrointestinal bleed and anxiety. Interventions included adaptive equipment as ordered, honor food preferences as able, medications as ordered, monitor consistency of diet served, obtain food preferences,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate bath linens were available as needed for resident care. This had the potential to affect 48 (#2, #3, #7, #8, #12, #13, #14, #15, #19, #22, #23, #24, #29, #32, #33, #35, #37, #39, #41, #42, #43, #44, #47, #51, #52, #53, #54, #61, #65, #69, #70, #72, #74, #75, #79, #82, #87, #88, #89, #91, #95, #96, #99, #100, #101, #105, #107, and #108) residents residing on the 400 and 500 units of 110 total residents in the facility. The census was 110.Findings Include:Observations on 07/23/25 from 8:00 A.M. to 12:30 P.M. revealed the following there were no washcloths available for resident care in either of the clean linen closets on the 400 unit and there were only five (5) towels available for resident care on the 500 unit.Interview with Laundry/Housekeeping Supervisor (LHS) #107 on 07/23/25 at approximately 9:00 A.M. confirmed the 400 unit had no washcloths and stated there should always be washcloths and towels in the clean linen closet for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of an incident report, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation to determine potential neglect of a resident. This affected one (#114) of three residents reviewed for neglect. The census was 110.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #114 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, enterocolitis, pulmonary fibrosis, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, morbid obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, major depressive disorder, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, repeated falls, hypocalcemia, hyperkalemia, acute kidney failure, hypertension, obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, and lymphedema. Review of Resident #114's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact.Review of Resident #114 progress notes dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete the physician order for a urine culture in an appropriate timeframe for one (#27) of three residents reviewed for orders for urine cultures. The facility census was 110. Findings include:Record review for Resident #27 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD), history of urinary tract infections (UTIs), and pyonephrosis.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. The resident was assessed to require staff assistance with bathing, dressing and grooming.Review of the care plan dated 06/24/25 revealed Resident #27 was at risk for infection related to a history of UTIs. Interventions included completing laboratory values as ordered and notifying the provider of abnormal results.Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and resident interview,the facility failed to protect the resident from abuse by staff. This affected one (Resident #54) of four resident records reviewed for abuse. The census was 105. Findings include: Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, major depression, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety, reduced mobility and anxiety. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was intact. She required set up or clean up assistance with oral hygiene, she is dependent for toileting, and requires substantial/maximal assistance for shower/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning. She is always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. Review of the plan of care she experiences alteration in mood and/or behavior as evidenced by resident has diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with necessary transportation to attend outside appointments as scheduled. This affected one (Resident #150) of three residents reviewed for transportation to outside appointments. The facility census was 112 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #150 revealed an admission date of 09/17/20 and a readmission date of 11/30/22 with diagnoses including unspecified injury at T2-T6 level of thoracic spinal cord, morbid obesity due to excess calories, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, paraplegia, unspecified mood (affective) disorder, and depression. Review of the care plan for Resident #150 initiated 11/30/22 revealed the care plan did not address the resident's need for transportation to outside appointments. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #150 dated 10/09/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview on 12/12/24 at 4:23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This affected one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 01/24/2021. Diagnoses included dementia, unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a memory problem and had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #12's nursing progress noted from 04/2024 revealed nothing related to inappropriate resident contact. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date 07/01/23. Diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, and primary open-angled glaucoma. His April 2024 orders revealed an order for a Wandergaurd to is right ankle. Review of his quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This affected one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed admission date of 01/24/2021. Diagnoses include dementia, unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a memory problem and had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #12's nursing progress noted from 04/2024 revealed nothing related to inappropriate resident contact. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date 07/01/23. Diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, and primary open-angled glaucoma. His April 2024 orders revealed an order for a Wandergaurd to is right ankle. Review of his quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an investigation and appropriate corrective action was implemented after staff used a mechanical lift incorrectly. This affected one (Resident #13) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 11/05/2022. Diagnosis included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, stiffness of the left hip, ataxia, and Moyamoya. Review of Resident #13's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/28/23 that stated the facility may utilize Hoyer lift for transfers as needed for weakness/difficulty transferring. Review of Resident #13's progress notes from 03/01/24 through 03/31/24 revealed no notes related to the incident. A note on 03/11/2024 at 10:18 P.M. revealed that neurological (Neuro) checks continue as ordered. Review of her Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she has intact cognition and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of manufacture guidelines the facility failed to remove five expired tuberculin (TB) solution vials from circulation. This had the potential to affect all 108 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 108. Findings Include: Observation on [DATE] at 1:20 P.M. of unit 400 medication storage refrigerator revealed an opened Aplisol tuberculin (TB) solution vial received from pharmacy on [DATE] with an opened date of [DATE]. Registered Nurse (RN) #212 confirmed the expired opened Aplisol TB solution vial. Observation on [DATE] at 1:30 P.M. of unit 200 medication storage refrigerator revealed an opened Aplisol TB solution vial received from the pharmacy on [DATE] with no opened date. Further observation revealed another opened Aplisol TB solution vial received from the pharmacy on [DATE] with no opened date. Registered Nurse (RN) #282 confirmed the two opened expired Aplisol TB solution vials. Observation on [DATE] at 1:42 P.M. of unit 300 medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures for the cleaning of glucometers (blood sugar meters) and proper hand hygiene during wound dressing change procedures. This affected two residents (Residents #26 and #108) out of eleven residents requiring blood sugar checks on Units 200 and 300, and one resident (Resident #6) out of three residents reviewed for skin pressure injuries. The facility census was 108. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #108's medical record revealed Resident #108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the admitting diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus type two, high blood pressure, hypothyroidism, and weakness. Resident #108 required limited assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. Review of Resident #108 signed physician orders revealed an order dated 11/01/23 for Novolog Insulin 100 unit per milliliter administered four times daily per blood sugar check results.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-30 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observation of wound care, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident room door and window blind was closed during wound care. This affected one (Resident #6) of one resident reviewed for privacy during wound care. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of the medical record review for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 05/19/23. Diagnoses included heart failure, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and primary osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 out of 15 indicating the resident had a severely impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #6 was noted to have one unstageable pressure ulcer, one stage II pressure ulcer, and three venous and arterial ulcers. Review of Resident #6's treatment orders dated 01/07/24 revealed the following treatment to be completed, Right upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident representative and staff interviews, review of laboratory test results, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify one resident's representative (Resident #7) of laboratory test results. The facility also failed to notify one resident's (Resident #7) physician/nurse practitioner/physician assistant or resident representative a lab was not completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #7) of one reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 108. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date on 11/16/21. Medical diagnoses included spinal stenosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease Stage 3, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) oropharyngeal phase. Review of the emergency contacts for Resident #7 revealed the resident's daughter (Daughter #301) was the resident's primary emergency contact and the resident's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #7 had impaired cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement preventative skin interventions to prevent repeated skin infections for Resident #85. Additionally, the facility failed to timely assess a bruise for one resident (Resident #4) and failed to implement physician order for a back brace for one resident (Resident #96). This affected two residents (Resident #4 and #85) out of four residents reviewed for skin integrity and one resident (Resident #96) out of three residents reviewed for positioning devices. The facility census was 108. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses including Huntington's Disease, depressive disorder, disorders of the bladder, overactive bladder, impaired communication, and anxiety. Resident #85 required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. Review of Resident #85's quarterly [NAME] Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observations, and facility's fall policy, the facility failed to ensure ordered fall interventions were in place. This affected one (Resident #86) of the eight residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 04/06/21. Diagnoses included Parkinson, hypokalemia, aphasia, seizures, vitamin B 12 deficiency anemia, and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 04/22/21 and revised 05/02/23 revealed Resident #86 was at risk for falls due to unsteady gait, Parkinson's, seizures, the use of psychotropic medication, incontinence, needing assistance with activities of daily living (ADL)'s. Interventions include to educate the resident on the use of the call light, keep call light is in reach, extend strips to the shower floor, commonly used articles in reach, keep trash can within reach, non-skid material to top of chair, to toilet, chair near window closet door,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observations, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assist residents with eating and implementing nutritional interventions with a noted significant weight loss. This affected two (Resident #2 and #70) of the three residents reviewed for nutritional support. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 11/09/22. Diagnoses included dementia, metabolic encephalopathy, encounter for palliative care, and dysphasia. Review of Resident #70's documented weights revealed on 04/06/23 resident weighed 155.4 pounds and then on 04/25/23 the resident weighted 138.4 pounds. This is a noted loss of 17 pounds in less than 30 days. Continued weights after 04/25/23 revealed weights at 138.4 or less. Review of Resident #70's dietary charting revealed no documentation noted to address the sudden 17 pound weigh loss or implementation of interventions to prevent further weight loss. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observation the facility failed to post safety signs indicating the use of oxygen outside of oxygen-dependent residents' rooms as required. This affected one resident (Resident #20) who receives oxygen. The facility census was 108. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] for Urinary Tract Infection, Respiratory disorder, and Acute Respiratory Failure. Review of the Care Plan dated 12/23/23 for Resident #20 indicated the resident receives oxygen therapy. Resident #20 suffers from respiratory deficits caused by a history of Coronavirus disease 19, which includes persistent shortness of breath, pneumonia, and respiratory failure. Review of Resident #20 orders dated 12/24/23 revealed resident is to receive oxygen continuous per nasal cannula to maintain saturation above 90% every shift for hypoxia. Observation on 01/22/24 at 2:47 P.M. revealed the absence of safety signs indicating the use of oxygen outside of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer blood pressure medication according to the physician's order for one resident (Resident #75). This affected one (Resident #75) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 108. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an initial admission date on 03/03/20 and a readmission date on 03/30/23. Medical diagnoses included cerebral palsy, chronic atrial fibrillation, presence of cardiac pacemaker, and hypotension (low blood pressure). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #75 had mildly impaired cognition and scored a 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #75 was independent with completing bed mobility, toileting, and dressing and required supervision or set up help from staff to complete transfers, hygiene, showering/bathing, and eating tasks. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain a laboratory test as ordered by a physician for one resident (Resident #7). This affected one (Resident #7) of one reviewed for laboratory tests. The facility census was 108. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date on 11/16/21. Medical diagnoses included spinal stenosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease Stage 3, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) oropharyngeal phase. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #7 had impaired cognition and scored a 7 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #7 required assistance ranging from partial assistance to dependence on staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated November 2023 revealed an order for Resident #7 to check Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP), check potassium level one time only for two days was dated 11/28/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility infection control logs and infection control documentation, staff training records and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and effective infection control program to timely identify and implement corrective measures when trends and increased numbers of infection were identified to prevent the spread of infection including COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 105 residents residing in the facility. Findings include Review of the infection control log for November 2021 revealed 34 of the 102 residents in the facility were on antibiotics (33%) during the month. This included 13 residents treated for urinary tract infections (UTIs), 12 residents with skin or wound infections, six residents with respiratory infections and six residents with eye infections, C Diff, or other infections. Review of the infection control log for December 2021 revealed 32 of the 107 residents in the facility were on antibiotics (30%). This included 12 residents treated for UTIs, six residents with skin or wound infections, eight residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to obtain written authorization to manage personal funds and failed to ensure funds were maintained in an interest-bearing account for a Medicaid recipient. This affected one resident (#38) of nine residents reviewed for resident funds. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 03/02/21 with diagnoses including diabetes, diabetic neuropathy, right left below knee amputation and urine retention. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/23/22 revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Score (BIMS) of 14. The assessment revealed the resident required extensive assistance with staff for transfers and mobility. On 04/14/22 at 10:20 A.M. interview with Business Office Manager (BOM) #228 revealed Resident #38 provided the business office manager an envelope of money. BOM #228 revealed the envelope initially had $450.00. BOM #228 counted out the remaining money in the envelope to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to establish a system that assures the full, complete and separate accounting, according to generally accepted accounting principles related to funds being held by the facility for Resident #38. This affected one resident (#38) of nine residents reviewed for resident funds. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 03/02/21 with diagnoses including diabetes, diabetic neuropathy, right left below knee amputation and urine retention. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/23/22 revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Score (BIMS) of 14. The assessment revealed the resident required extensive assistance with staff for transfers and mobility. On 04/14/22 at 10:20 A.M. interview with Business Office Manager (BOM) #228 revealed Resident #38 provided the business office manager an envelope of money. BOM #228 revealed the envelope initially had $450.00. BOM #228…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with personal privacy. This affected one resident (#17) of one resident reviewed for privacy. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 01/20/22. She had resided in the same room since admission. A Minimum Data Set assessment completed on 01/27/22 stated the resident required extensive assistance from staff with transfers and locomotion. Interview with Resident #17 on 04/12/22 at 9:43 A.M. revealed the sliding door to the bathroom in her room does not close all the way. (room [ROOM NUMBER]). She stated that if the main door to her room does not get shut by staff, she feels like the people in the hallway can see her using the bathroom. (The bathroom is located right beside the main door to the room). She stated sometimes she does not like to go to the bathroom because of this. She stated the door had been this way since she was admitted .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to update and submit Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR) for Resident #95 and Resident #104 to include all mental health diagnoses. The affected two residents (#95 and #104) of four residents reviewed for PASARR screenings. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an original admission date on 02/20/18 and a recent readmission date on 02/20/22. Medical mental health diagnoses included generalized anxiety disorder (04/30/18), schizoaffective disorder (09/14/18), major depressive disorder (03/02/18), and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition (02/20/18). Review of the PASARR screening for Resident #104 dated 03/15/18 revealed mood disorder and psychotic disorder were included on the PASARR. The resident received new mental health diagnoses on 04/30/18 and 09/14/18. There were no updated PASARR screenings included in Resident #104's medical record that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview facility failed to ensure Resident #36's plan of care was implemented and updated to reflect the resident's dental care needs. This affected one resident (#36) of 27 residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 02/10/21. Resident #36 had diagnoses including cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus type two, respiratory disorder, hemiplegia, seizure disorder, hypertension, anxiety, depression, atrial fibrillation, chronic pain and polyneuropathy. Review of the plan of care, dated 09/20/21 revealed Resident #36 had impaired dentition and was at risk for oral problems including pain, chewing and swallowing difficulty and had upper and lower dentures. Interventions on the care plan included if dentures were ill fitting, contact social services to make arrangements to get dentures examined for repairs, complete an oral assessment per schedule, dentures to be worn for meals, monitor and report to the physician any reports of pain or poor fitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on closed record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview facility failed to provide a safe discharge for Resident #111. This affected one resident (#111) of one resident reviewed for discharge. Findings include Review of the medical record for the Resident #111 revealed an admission date of 01/28/22 with discharge date of 02/12/22. Resident #111 had diagnoses including dementia without behaviors, diabetes type one, asthma legal blindness, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and history of falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/04/22 revealed Resident #111 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 and required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and extensive assist of one staff for transfers. Review of the progress notes dated 02/12/22 at 5:20 P.M. revealed resident left facility with family and all belongings. The nurse was unsuccessful in contacting listed phone numbers on resident's profile. The nurse left message for resident's wife and attempted to contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff received assistance with hygiene including shaving, and nail care. This affected one resident (#15) of the four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnosis included fracture of part of the neck of the right femur, orthopedic aftercare, non-displaced type II dens fracture (dens is also known as the odontoid bone, an upward extension of the Cervical 2 (C2) vertebrae up into the C1), trochanteric fracture of the left femur, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and legal blindness as defined in the United States. Review of Resident #15's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15's cognition had not been assessed. Resident #15 was noted to required extensive assistance from two staff members for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure all residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and/or the residents' choices. The facility failed to ensure Hospice communication documentation was kept readily available for review at the facility or in the resident's medical record for Resident #16 and failed to ensure the Hospice provider was notified timely of changes in the resident's condition. The facility failed to monitor bruising following a fall for Resident #47. The facility failed to schedule and complete an ordered Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) timely for Resident #104. This affected three residents (Residents #16, #47 and #104) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date on [DATE] with diagnoses including moderate protein-calorie…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #38, who developed a pressure ulcer in the facility received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing. This affected one resident (#38) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 03/02/21 with diagnoses including diabetes with neuropathy and right below the knee amputation. The resident was admitted with an unstageable pressure ulcer to the bottom of his left foot. On 03/02/21 the resident was assessed as not being at risk for pressure ulcers with a score of 19. The rating system used by the facility was a score of 15-18 was at risk, 13-14 moderate risk, 10-12 high risk, 9 or below very high risk. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/09/21 indicated the resident had an unstageable pressure ulcer on admission. An MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 02/11/22 indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for residents at risk for falls and/or with history of falling. This affected two residents (#16 and #73) of four residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 08/21/20 with diagnoses including insomnia, recurrent major depressive disorder and heart failure. Review of the plan of care, dated 01/05/21 revealed Resident #73 was at risk for falls due to a history of a cerebral vascular accident (CVA), impaired balance and personal history of falls. Interventions included to ensure brakes to wheelchair were fixed, encourage and remind to ask for assistance, ensure call light was within reach, ensure environment was free of clutter, commonly used articles were in reach, pull tab alarm was attached to bed and wheelchair, non-skid strips to the right side of the bed and visual reminders on bathroom wall to ask for help. A plan of care, dated 07/07/21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing to rule out a possible urinary tract infection was completed timely and as ordered for Resident #362 who had a history of urinary tract infections. This affected one resident (#362) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #362 revealed an admission date of 03/29/22 with diagnoses including unspecified fracture of shaft of humerus in right arm, Type II diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection (UTI) and unspecified atrial fibrillation. Review of the admission Bowel and Bladder Assessment, dated 03/29/22 revealed Resident #362 had an indwelling catheter at the time of admission. The remaining sections of the assessment were not completed. Review of the plan of care, dated 03/29/22 revealed Resident #362 had an alteration in elimination related to recently having recently having a Foley catheter. Interventions included to monitor for signs and symptoms of UTI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring was completed related to the administration of cardiac medication for Resident #36 to ensure the medication was necessary and administered at the most effective dosage. The facility also failed to ensure adequate justification for the use of Tagamet prescribed to treat sexual behaviors for Resident #100 and failed to ensure staff documented and monitored for target behaviors to ensure the justification of the continued use of the medication. This affected two residents (#36 and #100) of four residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 02/10/21. Resident #36 had diagnoses including cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus type two, respiratory disorder, hemiplegia, seizure disorder, hypertension, anxiety, depression, atrial fibrillation, chronic pain and polyneuropathy. Review of the care plan, dated 09/20/21 revealed resident had cardiac symptoms with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to obtain or provide timely dental services to meet the needs of each resident. This affected two residents (#36 and #55) of four residents reviewed for dental services. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 12/05/21. Record review revealed the resident had a physician's order for a low concentrated sweets diet (no texture modifications). An oral assessment, dated 12/05/21 revealed the resident was edentulous (no teeth) and had no dentures. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, completed 12/12/21 revealed the resident was edentulous. The MDS care area assessment (CAA) dental status revealed the resident was noted with impaired dentition. It did not mention if the resident had dentures. An oral assessment, dated 03/30/22 indicated the resident was edentulous with no dentures. A quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment, completed 04/03/22 did not indicate any issues related to dental status. The MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #36's medical record was maintained in a complete and accurate manner. This affected one resident (#36) of 27 residents whose medical records were reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 02/10/21. Resident #36 had diagnoses including cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus type two, respiratory disorder, hemiplegia, seizure disorder, hypertension, anxiety, depression, atrial fibrillation, chronic pain and polyneuropathy. Review of the plan of care, dated 09/20/21 revealed Resident #36 had impaired dentition and was at risk for oral problems including pain, chewing and swallowing difficulty and had upper and lower dentures. Interventions on the care plan included if dentures were ill fitting, contact social services to make arrangements to get dentures examined for repairs, complete an oral assessment per schedule, dentures to be worn for meals, monitor and report to the physician any reports of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program to ensure the appropriate use of antibiotics to reduce the development of antibiotic-resistant infections/organisms. This affected one resident (#38) of five residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 03/02/21 and a diagnosis of urinary retention. Record review revealed Resident #38 had a physician's order for an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of a nurse's progress note, dated 11/01/21 at 1:13 P.M. revealed a new order was obtained to complete a urinalysis and culture and sensitivity related to Resident #38 being febrile. Review of temperature records revealed on 10/31/21 at 12:53 P.M. a temperature of 101.1 degrees Fahrenheit (F). On 10/31/21 at 3:45 P.M. his temperature was 100.1 degrees F. On 11/01/21 at 12:07 A.M. his temperature was 99.8 degrees F. On 11/01/21 at 7:32 A.M. his temperature was 98.8 degrees F. and at 1:47 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview facility failed to ensure the flu vaccine was offered and provided to Resident #72. This affected one resident (#72) of five residents reviewed for vaccines. Findings include Review of the medical record for the Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 09/30/21 with diagnoses including Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, depression, psychosis, dementia with behavioral disturbances, constipation and anxiety. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/11/22 revealed Resident #72 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 8. Review of Section O of the MDS assessment, revealed the flu vaccine was not offered or provided. Review of Resident #72's hard chart medical record contained a flu vaccination consent form that only contained the resident's name printed at the top and the date of admission [DATE]). The form did not have a selection marked regarding the vaccination and consent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 4.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLLERAN, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2019 |
| KRYSTOWSKI, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2018 |
| FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2019 |
| DUVAL, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2018 |
| DIPIETRA, JOHN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $917K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366353. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.