Hickory Creek Of Athens

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 37.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 71.2 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of on-call physician contact procedures, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who had a significant change in condition, received appropriate and timely consultation with the on-call advanced level provider for a transfer to the hospital for an evaluation. This affected one (Resident #36) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Actual Harm occurred when Resident #36 displayed a significant change in condition consistent with a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and did not receive a timely transfer to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. Resident #36 suffered an ischemic stroke but could not be given tissue plasminogen activator (a medication used to break down blood clots) due to being outside the treatment window for optimal results. Resident #36 was hospitalized for several days before returning to the facility with residual effects from his stroke. The facility census was 78. Findings Include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide proper justification for the use of medication for dementia. This affected one, (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 78. Findings Include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were acute kidney failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type II diabetes, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, chronic respiratory failure, dysphagia, congestive heart failure, schizoaffective disorder, atrial fibrillation, anemia, anxiety disorder, anemia, acute embolism and thrombosis, osteoarthritis, mild cognitive impairment, hyperlipidemia, peripheral vascular disease, and hernia. Review of his minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/30/25, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #3's current physician orders found he was prescribed the following medications for dementia: Olanzapine (antipsychotic) 5 milligrams (mg) and Namenda (used to treat…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter care was provided in accordance with acceptable infection control practices to prevent infections. The facility also failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter's collection bag was maintained off the floor to help prevent infection. This affected one, (Resident #5) of two residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, and urinary retention.Review of Resident #5's physician's orders revealed he had an order in place for the use of an 18 French indwelling urinary catheter with 10 milliliter (ml) balloon related to obstructive uropathy. The orders also included the need to perform catheter care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide continued mental health services and implement interventions for a resident at risk of suicide. This affected one resident (#24) of three residents reviewed for depression. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, contracture of muscle to right lower leg, unspecified personality disorder, and bilateral osteoarthritis of knees. Additional diagnoses of anxiety disorder and brief psychotic disorder were added on 06/19/24. Review of orders revealed Resident #24 had orders in place for Aricept tablet 10 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth (06/20/24); sensor bed alarm to alert staff of resident's desire to transfer and check placement every shift (06/20/24); low bed for safety (06/20/24); and lurasidone hci tablet 60 mg give one tablet by mouth once…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. This affected one of nine residents on enhanced barrier precautions (Resident #11), one of two residents receiving glucometer checks on the Brookside wing (Resident #15), and one of two residents reviewed for indwelling catheters (Resident #18). Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 05/10/24 and diagnoses including dementia, diabetes, and alcoholic cirrhosis. The resident also had gastrostomy tube for nutrition. Observations of medication administration on 06/04/24 at 11:30 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #150 to administer medication through Resident #11's gastrostomy tube. Upon entering the room there was a sign on the door indicating the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions. LPN #150 did not apply a gown…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and observations, the facility failed to conduct accurate assessments in the area of hearing status. This affected two of four residents reviewed for communication (Residents #3 and #37). Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 01/08/17. The resident had a diagnosis on 01/27/23 of sensorineural hearing loss bilaterally (hearing loss caused by damage to the inner ear or the nerve from the ear to the brain). The plan of care dated 05/08/23 stated the resident had sensorineural hearing loss and would participate in audiology services as needed. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 07/27/23 revealed the resident had moderate difficulty hearing and had no hearing aid. Review of MDS assessments completed 10/16/23 and 04/15/24 revealed the resident had adequate hearing and no hearing aide. The MDS assessment on 04/15/24 stated a brief interview for mental status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Observation and interview with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents were accurate to resident current conditions and diagnoses. This affected two residents (Resident #45 and Resident #46) of three residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 77. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were COPD, congestive heart failure, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, hypertension, depression, anxiety disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and bipolar disorder. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/04/24, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #45's significant change PASRR document, dated 03/06/24, revealed under Section D, the diagnoses listed were mood disorder, panic or other severe anxiety disorder, other psychotic disorder, and bipolar disorder. But review of her diagnoses list,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and observation, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan in the area of hearing status. This affected one of four residents reviewed for communication (Resident #37). Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 01/08/17. The resident had a diagnosis on 01/27/23 of sensorineural hearing loss bilaterally (hearing loss caused by damage to the inner ear or the nerve from the ear to the brain). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 07/27/23 revealed the resident had moderate difficulty hearing and had no hearing aid. Review of MDS assessments completed 10/16/23 and 04/15/24 revealed the resident had adequate hearing and no hearing aide. The MDS assessment on 04/15/24 stated a brief interview for mental status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Observation and interview with Resident #37 on 06/03/24 at 2:21 P.M. revealed the resident to be very hard of hearing. The resident had her television volume turned up to 68.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and observations, the facility failed to residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities. This affected two of four residents reviewed for communication (Residents #3 and #37). Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 07/03/23. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 04/04/24 documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 07/12/23 revealed the resident had trouble hearing and would be referred to audiology for evaluation. Review of a consultation report revealed Resident #3 had an ear care exam on 12/06/23 by a nurse practitioner. The report stated the resident's tympanic membranes were visible in both ears. There was no evidence of a hearing evaluation and the fact that the resident had trouble hearing was not mentioned in the report. Interview with Resident #3 on 06/03/24 at 9:10 A.M. revealed he has difficulty hearing and has had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents, who were at risk for falls and had a history of falls, had fall prevention interventions implemented as per their plan of care. This affected two (Resident #18 and #28) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included adult onset diabetes mellitus, unspecified psychosis, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, unspecified dementia, Parkinson's disease, insomnia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #18's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had clear speech. He was able to make himself understood and was usually able to understand others. His cognition was severely impaired and he was known to have other behaviors not directed at others. He also had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately review all medications for proper justification via pharmacy monthly reviews. This affected one (Resident #12) of five residents reviewed for medications. The census was 77. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were type II diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, chronic bronchitis, COPD, epileptic seizures, allergic rhinitis, hypertension, personal history of traumatic brain injury, insomnia, obesity, age related nuclear cataract, macular degeneration, osteoarthritis of knee, presbyopia, hallux valgus, and dysphagia. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/15/24, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #12's physician orders revealed she was prescribed and administered Rifaximin Tablet 550 milligrams (mg) twice daily for prevention. This order was originally put in place on 12/14/20. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $635K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH