Lake Pointe Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 56.9 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, and review of the dietitian contract, the dietetic technician's personnel file, and emails, the facility failed to ensure dietitian oversight of a dietetic technician's competency. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Review of the contract between the facility and Consultant Registered Dietitian (CRD) #249 dated 08/01/25 revealed the said dietitian provided the facility with medical nutrition therapy for its residents to include but not limited to nutrition assessments based on the minimum data set (MDS) schedule, and assessments of residents experiencing significant weight changes, compromised skin integrity (pressure ulcers specifically), or has a high risk with receiving specialized care, such as dialysis, tube feeding or hospice services and pediatrics as needed. The primary clinical duties were carried out by the Dietetic Technician (DT), which CRD #249 would supervise. The CRD visited the facility quarterly and more often as needed to complete food service operations audits,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain resident medical records in a secure environment that safeguarded it from unauthorized use and prevented loss or destruction. This affected an unidentified number of discharged residents. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Interview on 12/30/25 at 12:30 P.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) regarding storage of resident medical records revealed storage of any current residents' records were kept in the locked business office area for confidentiality but stated being unsure of where discharged residents' records were kept.Observation on 12/30/25 at 12:55 P.M. of a detached storage garage on the facility grounds with Director of Maintenance (DOM) #210 revealed it was an unlocked storage area which contained general storage of maintenance equipment and a large amount of banker boxes filled with files. Near the entrance of the garage door were approximately ten opened and unsealed boxes piled on top of each other which contained confidential medical and personal information of discharged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-06 · tag F0570 — pattern
  Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, review of the facility surety bond, review of the resident fund balance, and review of a facility email review, the facility failed to maintain surety bond coverage to meet or exceed the total resident fund balance. This affected 29 residents (#1, #2, #3, #6, #9, #12, #14, #16, #20, #25, #27, #28, #29, #31, #32, #33, #35, #38, #39, #41, #44, #45, #47, #48, #51, #52, #53, #56 and #59) out of 29 residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Review of the facility document labeled Trust Current Account Balance as of 01/05/26, the total resident fund balance for Residents #1, #2, #3, #6, #9, #12, #14, #16, #20, #25, #27, #28, #29, #31, #32, #33, #35, #38, #39, #41, #44, #45, #47, #48, #51, #52, #53, #56 and #59 was $24,725.31. Review of the facility's surety bond signed 10/24/24 and effective for effective from 02/01/25 through 02/01/26 revealed a coverage amount of $15,000.00, which is less than the total resident fund balance.Review of a facility email dated 01/06/26 at 8:38 A.M. revealed a request by the Chief Financial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This affected five Residents (#15, #19, #24, #25 and #41) out of five residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 61.Findings include:1. Observation on 12/29/25 at 10:00 A.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #210 of Residents #24 and #25's room revealed packaging tape wrapped around the window curtains over the window. A strong draft of cold air was felt leaking around the closed curtains. The bathroom had stained and dirty flooring as well as a black substance around the faucet fixtures. The bathroom door had a large piece of wood missing and the door edges were uneven and rough having potential for splintering. The air pressure alarm for Resident #25's mattress was alarming. Interview at the time of the observation with Residents #24 and #25 and MD #210 revealed the residents complained to MD #210 regarding the draft of cold air leaking from the window. MD #210 provided Resident #25 with wide packaging tape to seal the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical records and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care plans reflected resident needs regarding diagnoses and medications. This affected one Resident (#4) out of eight resident records reviewed. The facility census was 61.Review of medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 11/04/25 with a diagnoses of cellulitis left lower limb, septic pulmonary embolism, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus, staphylococcal arthritis left ankle and foot, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and iron deficiency anemia. Review of comprehensive care plan dated 11/04/25 revealed no goals or interventions to manage Resident #4's foley catheter which was present on admission, or was revised to include diagnosis of anemia and hypokalemia (low potassium) which required a blood transfusion and intravenous potassium chloride infusion at the hospital on [DATE]. Resident labs are now being monitored weekly for any acute changes and medication management and were not included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, and review of facility menus, the diet report and resident council minutes, the facility failed to ensure a well-balanced meal was served at lunch on 12/25/25 and the menu changes were approved by the dietitian. This affected one resident (#2) of three residents (#2, #18 and #37) reviewed for food service. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 04/29/23. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis, depressive disorder, congestive heart failure, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required set up and clean up help with eating. Review of the diet type report dated 12/05/25 revealed Resident #2 received a regular diet. Interview on 12/29/25 at 9:38 A.M. with Resident #2 revealed the food was not nutritional, lunch on 12/25/25 was four ounces of chicken noodle soup and applesauce. Resident #2 stated they get…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility investigation, and interview the facility failed to maintain a safe environment to prevent accidents for Resident #44. This affected one resident (#44) of three resident reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/02/24 with diagnoses including paraplegia, traumatic brain injury, suicidal ideations, transsexualism, suicidal behavior, conversion disorder with seizures, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and borderline personality disorder. Review of Resident #44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. She required setup or clean up help with eating, oral hygiene, substantial to maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, dressing, personal hygiene, showers, and bed mobility. Transfers were completed with the use of the Hoyer (mechanical) lift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and transmission-based precautions (TBP) appropriately as required. This affected nine residents (#2, #4, #12, #15, #21, #24, #39, #49 and #55) and had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 06/17/24 at 8:20 A.M. during a facility tour revealed the following: • An EBP sign was posted at the entrance of Resident #2's room. There was a storage bin to the left of the entrance door which held personal protective equipment (PPE). Next to the PPE storage bin placed along the hallway wall were two large garbage containers, one for soiled linen and the other for infectious garbage lined with a red trash bag. • An EBP sign was posted at the entrance of Resident #4's room. There was no available PPE at or near the entrance for staff use with EBP. • A TBP sign which did not designate the type of precautions and an EBP sign were posted at the entrance of Resident #21's room. The storage bin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for Residents #16 and #42 when medications were signed out from the controlled drug records without evidence of administering the medication on the medication administration record (MAR) and verifying the medication was being administered as ordered by the physician. This affected two residents (#16 and #42) reviewed for controlled drug administration and had the potential to affect 25 additional residents (#2, #6, #10, #12, #15, #18, #19, #21, #23, #24, #25, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #37, #39, #41, #44, #47, #48, #49, #52 and #56) who received controlled medications. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 07/08/21. Diagnoses included low back pain and chronic pain. Review of Resident #16's physician orders revealed an order dated 09/06/23 for oxycodone 10-325 mg (milligrams) (opioid pain medication) every eight hours as needed for moderate to severe pain and no more than two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect by maintaining uncovered urinary catheter drainage bags in public view. This affected two residents (#15 and #37) of six residents with urinary catheters. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 06/06/24. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease stage III, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of the physician orders effective June 2024 revealed Resident #15 required routine urinary catheter related care daily. Observation on 06/17/24 at 8:20 A.M. revealed Resident #15 lying in bed with an uncovered urinary catheter drainage bag hanging on the bed frame facing the doorway which was visible from the hallway outside of the room. Observation on 06/17/24 at 8:58 A.M. revealed Resident #15 lying in bed with an uncovered urinary catheter drainage bag hanging on the bed frame facing the doorway visible from the hallway outside of the room. Interview at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $843K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH