No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Washington Square Healthcare Center

202 Washington Street NW, Warren, OH 44483 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 83 certified beds · (330) 399-8997 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 20262 immediate-jeopardy citations$46,963 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $46,963 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
320 High St NE · (330) 394-9090 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
150 E Market St Rm 100 · (330) 984-4013 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1020 N Park Ave · (330) 392-6707 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.5%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms31.6%30.1%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.1%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.8%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.4%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.0%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.5%75.6%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.4%CMS range 25.1–53.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 6.6–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
45.9%
Total nursing turnover
72.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 69.8 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-24)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

64 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-07-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide basic life support (BLS), including Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to Resident #61 per the residents advanced directive for a full code status, when the resident was found unresponsive and absent of vital signs. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm and the subsequent of death of Resident #61 beginning on [DATE] when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #135 alerted Registered Nurse (RN) #142 Resident #61was absent of vital signs. Instead of providing immediate care (i.e. CPR) RN #142 assessed the resident to be absent of vital signs and contacted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #136 who was working another unit to verify the resident ' s death. RN #142 pronounced the resident ' s time of death of 4:50 P.M. RN #142 notified the physician without indicating CPR was not initiated, and Physician #187 gave orders to release the resident to the funeral home. Resident #61 ' s family was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, facility policy and procedure review and interviews, the facility failed to provide timely, necessary and adequate care and services following an acute change in condition involving Resident #61 that started on [DATE]. The facility failed to ensure changes in the residents ' medical condition were comprehensively assessed, the residents change in condition, including abnormal vital signs and extreme loss of balance, was communicated to the medical provider, and individualized interventions were implemented. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm with subsequent death beginning on [DATE] when Resident #61 experienced hypotension (low blood pressure defined as a systolic pressure or top number below 90 millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg) and/or diastolic pressure or bottom number below 60 mm/Hg), dizziness, extreme loss of balance with his body going limp and eyes rolling back in his head while in physical therapy, as identified by the Physical Therapy Director (PTD)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was properly transported in a wheelchair to prevent injury. Actual harm occurred on 03/13/26 when Resident #5, who had hemiplegia (total loss of voluntary movement of affected muscle resulting in stiffness or spasticity) in his right leg and required a wheelchair for mobility, was transported to an appointment under the supervision of Transporter #719. Transporter #719 failed to maintain proper positioning of Resident #5, causing his right leg to press into the leg rests. His foot also repeatedly hit the ground when being pushed in a wheelchair to his physician appointment. Resident #5 winced in pain and complained of pain in his right leg to the staff at the physician's office. Resident #5 developed bruising and a wound infection of the right leg and was hospitalized on [DATE]. Resident #5 was diagnosed with an acute, nondisplaced transverse fracture of the proximal tibial metaphysis. No surgical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-10-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure routine assessment/skin monitoring was completed and failed to prevent the development of an avoidable pressure ulcer injury for Resident #68. Following the development of the pressure ulcer, the facility failed to ensure treatments were completed as ordered. Actual Harm occurred on 07/19/23 when Resident #68, who was assessed to be at risk for pressure ulcer development was found to have an open wound (to the left lateral foot) with no evidence of any type of treatment being initiated. On 07/20/23 the area was assessed to be unstageable (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough (yellow, tan, gray, green or brown) and/or eschar (tan, brown or black) in the wound bed) pressure ulcer. This affected one resident (#68) of three reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 61. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 01/24/23 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospital record review, review of email communication, policy review and interview, the facility failed to readmit Resident #69 during the appeal of a discharge notice. After issuing a discharge notice, the resident became distressed, made threats toward the Administrator, and was hospitalized for psychiatric evaluation. Once stabilized and cleared by hospital staff, the facility refused timely readmission and did not provide required documentation showing an inability to meet the resident's ongoing needs or a safe long-term discharge plan, leaving the resident without appropriate long-term placement. This affected one resident (#69) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 68.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #69 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 06/09/26. Resident #69 had diagnoses including heart failure, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to demonstrate effective leadership of the overall facility operations to ensure each resident attained/maintained their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:Review of the job description for Registered Nurse (RN)/Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed it was signed by RN/ADON #663 on 05/08/25. The position summary included the nurse would assist the Director of Nursing with management and training of the nursing services staff and the overall management of resident care; be aware of and adhere to residents' bill of rights; be aware of resident abuse reporting law; demonstrate availability to be on call 24 hours a day for nursing emergencies; make rounds upon entering the building each day; and be responsible for ensuring that nursing staff were aware of their job descriptions and the facilities expectations for resident care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, facility staff failed to report allegations of rights violations, misappropriation, neglect and/or abuse in a timely manner. This affected seven residents (Residents #18, #32, #43, #72, #75, #79 and #80) out of 11 residents reviewed for reporting of abuse and/or resident rights violations. This had the potential to affect 32 residents residing in the [NAME] Unit (Residents #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #9, #12, #13, #16, #18, #21, #22, #27, #28, #33, #34, #35, #38, #39, #40, #42, #43, #47, #49, #51, #55, #60, #63, #68, #69, #72 and #73) and 25 residents (Residents #1, #3, #8, #11, #12, #15, #16, #27, #28, #31, #32, #36, #37, #39, #41, #42, #44, #46, #49, #54, #60, #69, #70, #72 and #73) identified on insulin. The facility census was 74.Findings include:1. Review of closed medical record for Former Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 08/26/25 and he passed away 10/25/25 at the facility under hospice services. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were maintained. This affected one Resident (#43) out of 11 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 10/10/25 and his diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 had intact cognition, and no behaviors were identified.Review of care plan last revised 05/05/26 revealed Resident #43 had a behavior problem related to demanding medications for immediate administration, attention seeking, verbal aggression, swearing towards staff, and making false allegations. Interventions included adjusting voice tone; behavior contract given; caregivers to provide opportunities for positive interaction and attention; stop and talk with him when passing by; intervene as necessary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and facility policy, the facility failed to timely investigate into allegations that led to misappropriation of insulin. This affected four residents (Residents #12, #15, #16 and #32) out of five residents reviewed for misappropriation of their insulin. This had the potential to affect 25 residents (Residents #1, #3, #8, #11, #12, #15, #16, #27, #28, #31, #32, #36, #37, #39, #41, #42, #44, #46, #49, #54, #60, #69, #70, #72 and #73) identified on insulin. The facility census was 74.Findings include:1. Review of medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 10/05/23 and diagnoses included diabetes, anemia, cellulitis, and depression. Review of care plan last revised 07/18/25 revealed Resident #32 had diabetes. Interventions included medication as ordered, dietary consult for nutritional regimen with ongoing monitoring as needed, and discuss mealtimes, portion sizes, dietary restrictions as needed. Review of Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and facility policy, the facility failed to provide insulin to residents using accepted standards of clinical practice. This affected four residents (Residents #12, #15, #16 and #32) out of five residents reviewed for diabetic care. This had the potential to affect 25 residents (Residents #1, #3, #8, #11, #12, #15, #16, #27, #28, #31, #32, #36, #37, #39, #41, #42, #44, #46, #49, #54, #60, #69, #70, #72 and #73) identified on insulin. The facility census was 74. Findings include:1. Review of medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 10/05/23 and diagnoses included diabetes, anemia, cellulitis, and depression. Review of care plan last revised 07/18/25 revealed Resident #32 had diabetes. Interventions included medication as ordered, dietary consult for nutritional regimen with ongoing monitoring as needed, and discuss mealtimes, portion sizes, dietary restrictions as needed. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide showers for residents dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) per their preference and/or as scheduled. This affected two residents (Residents #25 and #70) out of three residents reviewed for ADL care. This had the potential to affect 35 residents (Residents #1, #3, #5, #8, #13, #15, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, 27, #29, #32, #33, #42, #44, #47, #48, #49, #50, #54, #55, #56, #57, #59, #60, #62, #66, #69, #70, #71 and #72) dependent on staff for ADL care including showers. The facility census was 74. Findings include:1. Review of medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 05/21/25 and his diagnoses included diabetes, heart failure, major depression, and hypertension.Review of Kardex care plan dated 06/04/25 revealed Resident #70 required extensive assist from one staff for showers, and he was dependent on two staff assist for transfers with use of a mechanical lift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure ostomy care was provided as recommended. This affected two residents (Residents #70 and #77) out of three residents reviewed for ostomy care. This had the potential to affect five Residents (#36, #48, #61, #70 and #77) who the facility identified with ostomies. The facility census was 74.Findings include:1. Review of medical record for Former Resident (FR) #77 revealed an admission date of 02/13/24 and his diagnoses included hypotension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, cerebral infarction, sepsis with acute organ dysfunction, septic shock, endocarditis, perforated bowel, history of cardiac arrest, and prolapsed ostomy.Review of care plan dated 08/07/25 revealed FR #77 had an alteration in gastrointestinal status related to colostomy. Interventions included empty ostomy bag each shift and as needed, give medications as ordered, monitor skin around stoma for irritation, sit upright for all meals and obtain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected two residents (Residents #32 and #73) out of eight residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 74.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/22/25 and his diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), multiple sclerosis, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 had impaired cognition and received a diuretic (medication that help move extra fluids out of the body). Review of care plan dated 10/03/23 revealed Resident #73 had COPD. Interventions included monitoring for difficulty breathing, giving aerosol and inhalers as ordered, and monitoring for signs of respiratory infection. Review of May 2026 Physician Orders and May 2026 Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the medical record contained accurate information. This affected two residents (Residents #32 and #77) out of 11 records reviewed for documentation accuracy. The facility census was 74. Findings include:1. Review of medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 10/05/23 and diagnoses included diabetes, anemia, depression and cellulitis. Review of Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was cognitively intact and received insulin.Review of care plan dated 07/17/26 revealed Resident #32 had diabetes. Interventions included medications as ordered, dietary consult, and discussing mealtimes, portion sizes, dietary restrictions and ongoing monitoring.Review of May 2026 Physician orders and Medication Administrator Record (MAR) revealed Resident #32 had the following orders: check blood sugar before meals at 7:00 A.M., 11:00 A.M., 4:00 P.M. and at bedtime (9:00 P.M.); and provide Humalog…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 50 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS) memorandum QSO-24-08-NH, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for Resident #54 during high contact resident care. This affected one resident (Resident #54) out of two residents observed for EBP. This had the potential to affect 27 residents (Residents #1, #3, #5, #9, #10, #19, #20, #21, #31, #34, #36, #39, #41, #43, #45, #44, #48, #53, #54, #56, #60, #61, #66, #67, #69 #70 and #73) identified by the facility on EBP.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 12/31/20 and her diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pulmonary edema. Review of care plan dated 10/07/25 revealed Resident #54 required EBP due to a feeding tube (a flexible tube inserted in the stomach to provide fluids…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the state agency as required. This affected one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of Resident #5's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/18/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction, hemiplegia (total loss of voluntary movement of affected muscle resulting in stiffness or spasticity) and hemiparesis (partial weakness) following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, unspecified psychosis, unspecified anxiety disorder, malignant neoplasm of colon, altered mental status, hypertension (high blood pressure), need for assistance for personal care, muscle atrophy, type two diabetes and aphasia (acquired language disorder affecting communication).Review of the care plan revised on 02/28/26 revealed Resident #5 was dependent on staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-04-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident representative was immediately notified about a leg injury and failed to ensure proper notification to the representative of an outside medical appointment for Resident #5. This effected one resident ( Resident #5) of six residents ( #3, #5, #30, #31, #41,and #58) reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 07/18/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction, hemiplegia (total loss of voluntary movement of affected muscle resulting in stiffness or spasticity) and hemiparesis (partial weakness) following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, unspecified psychosis, unspecified anxiety disorder, malignant neoplasm of colon, altered mental status, hypertension (high blood pressure), need for assistance for personal care, muscle atrophy, type two diabetes and aphasia (acquired language disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-04-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of witness statements, interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was free from verbal abuse by a staff member. This affected one resident (#5) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of Resident #5's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/18/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction, hemiplegia (total loss of voluntary movement of affected muscle resulting in stiffness or spasticity) and hemiparesis (partial weakness) following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, unspecified psychosis, unspecified anxiety disorder, malignant neoplasm of colon, altered mental status, hypertension (high blood pressure), need for assistance for personal care, muscle atrophy, type two diabetes and aphasia (acquired language disorder affecting communication). Review of the care plan revised on 02/28/26 revealed Resident #5 was dependent on staff for meeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to coordinate transportation services that were resident centered following a surgical procedure for the highest practicable well-being for Resident #41, and failed to adequately monitor Resident #5 following a change in health status resulting in hospitalization. This affected two residents ( Resident #5 and #41 ) of five residents reviewed for quality of care . The facility census was 67.Findings include:Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #5's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/18/22. Diagnoses included hemiplegia with right side weakness, muscle weakness and need for personal care assistance. Review of the care plan revised 02/28/26 revealed Resident #5 had hemiplegia related to a stroke. Interventions included reposition as tolerated every two hours. Resident #5 had self-care deficits that included dressing, personal hygiene, eating, toileting and bathing. Resident #5 required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #69 was free from a significant medication error. This affected one resident (#69) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 67. Findings include:Review of Resident #69's medical records revealed an admission date of 12/12/25. Diagnoses included diabetes, hypertension and difficulty walking. Review of care plan dated 03/11/26 revealed Resident #69 had diabetes. Interventions included administer diabetic medications as ordered, monitor/document/report signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) that included increased thirst.Review of physician orders for April 2026 included administer Humalog (fast acting insulin) subcutaneously per sliding scale before meals and at bedtime. If blood sugar 150 to 200 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) give two units, 201 to 250 give four units, 251 to 300 give six units, 301 to 350 give eight units, 351 to 400 give 10 units and if over 401 contact physician. Review of Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of blood sugar values. This affected one resident (#69) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 67.Review of Resident #69's medical records revealed an admission date of 12/12/25. Diagnoses included diabetes, hypertension and difficulty walking. Review of care plan dated 03/11/26 revealed Resident #69 had diabetes. Interventions included administer diabetic medications as ordered, monitor/document/report signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) that included increased thirst.Review of physician orders for April 2026 included administer Humalog (fast acting insulin) subcutaneously per sliding scale before meals and at bedtime.Review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed on 04/16/26 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #614 documented Resident #69's blood sugar of 131 (normal range is 60-100). Resident #69's sliding scale indicated no insulin required for a blood sugar reading of less than 150.Review of Resident #69's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of personnel files and review of the facility corrective action, the facility failed to ensure that all nursing staff were competent and legally licensed to provide nursing care and services to residents. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of the Ohio Board of Nursing (OBN) document Order, Suspension of License, revealed on 01/22/26 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #810's professional license was suspended due to narcotic diversion.Review of LPN #810's employee file revealed a hire date of 02/25/25 and a termination date of 02/25/26. There was no evidence in the file of a quarterly licensure verification completed by the facility on LPN #810's license.A confidential interview on 03/10/26 at 4:43 P.M. revealed concerns regarding LPN #810's professional license being suspended due to issues with narcotics and concern that LPN #810 continued to work without a license as a nurse providing nursing care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to demonstrate effective leadership of the overall facility operations to ensure each resident attained/maintained their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This affected five residents (#3, #28, #41, #43, and #68) and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of the job description for the position of Administrator revealed it was signed by the facility Administrator on 09/13/24. The position summary included leading and directing the overall operation of the facility in accordance with resident needs, government regulations, and company policies to maintain quality of care for the residents while achieving the facility's business directives. Administrative duties included but were not limited to maintaining working knowledge and ensuring compliance with all governmental regulations, monitoring employee relations practices of key staff to ensure compliance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility records review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the shower room on the [NAME] Unit was maintained in sanitary condition and good repair. This had the potential to affect all 37 (#1, #4, #7,#8, #9, #10, #12, #14, #17, #19, #21, #22, #25, #26, #27, #32, #34, #35, #38, #41, #42, #44, #46, #49, #50, #52, #53, #54, #56, #57, #58, #61, #62, #63, #64, #66, and #67) residents on the [NAME] Unit. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Observation on 03/10/26 at 1:30 P.M. of the [NAME] Unit shower room revealed the room was humid, and the ceiling vent did not turn on upon activation of the switch. The baseboard radiator was dented and rusty. Behind the toilet where the wall met the floor was a build-up of black substance for approximately 15 tiles, and each floor tile measured two inches by two inches. Upon entering the shower area, to the left above the shower head were approximately five to six black spots on the ceiling. At the bottom of the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated with respect and dignity. This affected one resident (Resident #68) out of 11 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/12/25. Diagnoses included hyperlipidemia, difficulty in walking, repeated falls, hypertension, type two diabetes, anxiety, depression and chronic kidney disease.Review of Resident #68's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition, was able to make all needs know and required supervision with eating, assistance from staff with dressing, toileting, and self-propelled in his wheelchair.Interview on 03/24/26 at 11:30 A.M. with Resident #68 revealed on 03/20/26 at 9:30 A.M. he spoke with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #819 and asked for his bed to be made and straighten up his room because his family was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of narcotics. This affected three residents (Residents #38, #41 and #69) of four residents reviewed for misappropriation of narcotics. The facility census was 67.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 09/29/23 with diagnoses including gangrene, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), cellulitis, type two diabetes, acquired absence of left toes, and muscle weakness.Review of Resident #38's care plan, revised 07/22/25, revealed the resident had actual pain related to cellulitis in left lower extremity. Staff were to monitor and document for side effects of pain medication, observe for constipation, new onset or increased agitation, restlessness, confusion, hallucinations, dysphoria, nausea, vomiting, dizziness and falls, report all occurrences to the physician. Additionally, staff were to monitor,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the facility self-reported incident (SRI) and investigation, and policy review the facility failed to ensure allegations of misappropriation of narcotics were thoroughly investigated. This affected three residents (Residents #28, 41 and #69) out of four residents reviewed for misappropriation of narcotics. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of SRI 271810 reported to the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) on 03/06/26 at 7:40 P.M. by the facility Administrator revealed an allegation of misappropriation was being reported. The alleged perpetrator was Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #816 and three residents (#28, #41 and #69) were allegedly involved. A brief description included that residents reported increased pain requiring additional medication and an investigation was initiated to ensure medications were being given. The facility unsubstantiated that abuse/misappropriation had occurred based on inconclusive evidence that misappropriation had occurred.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of care conference meeting documents, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure all minimum required members of the Interdisciplinary team were present during care plan meetings. This affected one resident (Resident #41) out of 11 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/07/23. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), kidney stones, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage three, viral hepatitis C, hypothyroidism, morbid obesity, mood disorder, bipolar disease, and anxiety.Review of Resident #41's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition was independent with eating and required partial to moderate assistance with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).Review of Resident #41's Care Conference meeting notes dated 03/03/26 revealed the only attendees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected one resident (Resident #70) of 11 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/13/25 and a discharge date of 11/20/25. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage four, depression, cerebral infarction, osteoarthritis, lower back pain, Alzheimer's disease, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), pressure ulcer of left heel stage three, and pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit.Review of Resident #70's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including medication administration.Review of Resident #70's physician orders dated November 2025 revealed the resident was to receive Fentanyl Transdermal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, review of the facility self-reported incident, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records were maintained for Resident #3 and Resident #43. This affected two residents (Resident #3 and Resident #43) out of 11 residents reviewed for resident records. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of the facility self-reported incident dated 02/28/26 revealed staff reported an allegation of physical abuse between Resident #3 and Resident #43. Details included Resident #3 placing his hands in the vicinity near Resident #43's neck, however, it was not seen by staff or anyone. The residents were separated, assessed to be free from injury, placed on 15-minute checks, and a room change was implemented to further separate the residents. The facility unsubstantiated that abuse had occurred.Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 02/05/26 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected one Resident (Resident #19) out of three residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 60.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 08/08/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes, cellulitis, depression, morbid obesity, malignant neoplasm or endometrium, need for assistance with personal care, and muscle weakness.Review of Resident #19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition, required setup to clean up assistance with eating, partial to moderate assistance with oral and personal hygiene, and substantial to maximal assistance with toileting and showering.Review of Resident #19's care plan, date initiated 08/21/23, revealed Resident #19 had a problem with psychosocial wellbeing related to a diagnosis of depression. Interventions included to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed to address individual needs and preferences related to insulin administration for Resident #19. This affected one resident (Resident #19) of 11 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 60. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 08/08/23 and a pertinent diagnosis of type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact and used insulin seven out of seven days. Review of the care plan, date initiated 08/21/23 and last revised on 05/01/25, revealed there was no care plan for the prescribed insulin, nor measurable goals or interventions pertaining to the use of insulin. There was nothing to indicate in the care plan that Resident #19 had preferences for certain nurses to not administer her insulin. Review of the physician orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #19) received her insulin as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 60. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 08/08/23 and a pertinent diagnosis of type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact and used insulin seven out of seven days. Review of the care plan, date initiated 08/21/23 and last revised on 05/01/25, revealed there was no care plan for insulin administration. On 02/29/24 a care plan was initiated for Resident #19 regarding resistance to care including refusing medications and insulin. The interventions included allow resident to make decisions about treatment, educate on possible outcomes of not complying, if possible negotiate a time for treatments…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure lab results were timely reported to the physician. This affected one resident (#19) out of three residents reviewed for lab services. The facility census was 60. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 08/08/23. Diagnoses included diabetes, morbid obesity, anemia, depression, kidney disease and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact and used insulin seven out of seven days.Review of the physicians orders for July 2025 revealed an order for Resident #19 to have her A1C (a blood test that provides an estimate of a person's average blood sugar levels over the past two to three months) drawn on admission then every six months.Review of the care plan dated 05/09/25 revealed resident #19 had a nutritional problem of morbid obesity. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, explaining and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure a complete and accurate medical record for Resident #19. This affected one resident (Resident #19) out of 11 residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical record. The facility census was 60.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 08/08/23 and a pertinent diagnosis of type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact and used insulin seven out of seven days. Review of the physician orders for July 2025 for Resident #19 revealed an order for insulin glargine subcutaneous 100 units per milliliter (ml) 38 units at bedtime. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2025 revealed no evidence insulin glargine 100ML 38 units at bedtime was administered to Resident #19 on 06/04/25 or 06/24/25, as the MAR on these dates for this medication was left blank and void of nurse initials…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. This had the potential to affect 14 residents (Residents #2, #5, #12, #15, #21, #25, #27, #32, #42, #47, #48, #49, #53 and #57) who resided on the [NAME] unit, out of 60 residents observed for physical environment. The facility census was 60.Findings include:An interview on 07/08/25 at 1:15 P.M. with Ombudsman #190 and Ombudsman #191 revealed Ombudsman #191 was present in the facility on 06/18/25 when there was a heavy rain storm and rain water was coming in under the exit door on the [NAME] unit in the hallway by Resident #21 and #27's room. Ombudsman #191 brought it to the attention of the Maintenance Director who verified that during heavy rain water flowed in under the exit door on that unit. Ombudsman #190 and Ombudsman #191 both confirmed they notified the Administrator and had a phone conversation with the Regional Director of Operations (RDO)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were disposed of timely when discontinued or a resident was discharged . This had the potential to affect all 29 residents residing on the [NAME] Unit (Residents #2, #3, #4, #6, #8, #16, #19, #20, #26, #31, #35, #36, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #45, #46, #47, #49, #52, #62, #116, #117, #118, #120 and #267). The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation on 04/21/25 at 1:48 P.M. of the medication storage room on the [NAME] Unit with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #338 revealed the room had resident medication cards, pill bottles and boxes of aerosol medications piled on shelves, on the floor, in baskets on the floor and in bags. There were four white pills in a plastic cup sitting on the shelf. LPN #338 verified she was unsure what pills were in the cup and who they belonged to. LPN #338 stated staff were to fill out a pharmacy paper and send the medications back to pharmacy when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment. This had the potential to affect all 29 residents (Residents #2, #3, #4, #6, #8, #16, #19, #20, #26, #31, #35, #36, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #45, #46, #47, #49, #52, #62, #116, #117, #118, #120 and #267) who resided on the [NAME] Unit, one resident ( Resident #1) on the [NAME] Unit, and an additional 13 residents (Residents 9, #11, #27, #23, #48, #22, #29, #17, #37, #28, #59, #53, #62) the facility identified as residents who smoke. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation was conducted on 04/22/25 from 3:45 P.M. to 4:01 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #314 of the facility physical environment and the following concerns were identified and verified with MD #314 at the time of the observations: • On theWashington Unit hallway there was a solid, dark brown water stain on the ceiling which MD #314 stated it was caused from a water leak. •…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to include the need for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for Resident #267. This affected one resident (#267) of 25 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #267 revealed an admission date of 04/10/25 with diagnosis including malignant neoplasm of the mouth, malignant neoplasm of the head, dysphagia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, bacteremia, attention to gastrostomy (a surgical procedure used to insert a tube through the abdomen and into the stomach), and cachexia. Review of Resident #267 Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had a feeding (gastrostomy) tube. Review of the physician order dated 04/14/25 revealed the feeding tube site needed cleansed with soap and water and apply dry dressing every night shift. There was no order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented for Resident #216 and Resident #267. This affected two residents (#216 and #267) of 21 residents (Resident #36, #35, #45, #46, #34, #6, #47, #40, #38 #2, #51, #7,#36, #48, #5, #32, #33, #53, #118, #216 and #267 ) the facility identified as requiring EBP. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #216's medical record revealed a readmission date of 10/24/24 with diagnoses including intracranial hemorrhage, malignant neoplasm of prostate, type two diabetes, altered mental status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pneumonia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #216's cognition was intact, and unhealed pressure ulcers were present upon admission/re-entry. Review of Resident #216's physician orders for April 2025 revealed no active orders for EBP. There was an order with a start…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview, review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) tracking number (#)240669, review of a personnel file, and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of a narcotic medication for Resident #56. This affected one resident (#56) of one resident reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 12/07/17. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, aphasia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, vascular dementia, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the progress notes from October 2023 to November 2023 revealed due to aphasia Resident #56 had difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement of Resident #10. This affected one resident (#10) of one resident reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 61. Finding include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, vertigo, heart failure, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia, muscle weakness, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had impaired cognition, no wandering behaviors, and could wheel 150 feet in a wheelchair. The resident required supervision for activities of daily living and with movement off the unit. Review of the elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was at a low risk for wandering. Review of Resident #10's care plan dated 02/13/23 revealed the resident was care planned for impaired thought process. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure the facility menus were followed and were reviewed by the facility registered dietitian as required for nutritional adequacy. The facility identified all 68 residents' received meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Interview on 08/23/23 at 10:25 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #357 revealed menus were not being followed. Interview on 08/23/23 at 2:44 P.M. with Dietary Aide #328 and Dietary Cook/Aide #358 revealed menu items had to be frequently substituted, since menu items were not available in the facility. Review of facility menu for 08/23/23 lunch revealed roast pork, roasted potatoes, vegetable blend, and cheesecake were to be served. Review of spreadsheets for facility menus from 08/20/23 to 08/26/23 revealed there were no spreadsheets. Observation of tray line on 08/23/23 from 12:01 P.M. to 1:27 P.M. revealed residents were served pork loin, cauliflower, mashed potatoes, and cheesecake. At the time of observation, Dietary Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to take into consideration the preferences of residents and did not ensure residents on a renal diet and carbohydrate consistent diet received a diet that met their special dietary needs. The facility identified two residents (#20 and #39) on a renal diet and 17 residents (#8, #10, #11, #16, #21, #23, #25, #32, #38, #50, #51, #56, #60, #61, #62, #65, and #68) on a carbohydrate consistent diet. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Interview on 08/23/23 at 9:35 A.M. with Dietary Director #322 revealed she made the menus and there were no spreadsheets for the menus. Interview on 08/23/23 at 10:20 A.M. with Resident #36 revealed she had been asked in the past what she wanted for the meal, but currently she wasn't being asked. Interview on 08/23/23 at 10:34 A.M. with Resident #61 revealed he was a diabetic and he didn't feel the facility was following a diabetic diet, since he was getting two Danishes at a time at breakfast. Interview on 08/23/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure competent dietary support staff to ensure residents on renal diets and carbohydrate consistent diets received meals per the physician's orders. The facility identified two residents (#20 and #39) on a renal diet and 17 residents (#8, #10, #11, #16, #21, #23, #25, #32, #38, #50, #51, #56, #60, #61, #62, #65, and #68) on a carbohydrate consistent diet. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Interview on 08/23/23 at 9:35 A.M. with Dietary Director #322 revealed she made the menus and there were no spreadsheets for the menus. Interview on 08/23/23 at 10:34 A.M. with Resident #61 revealed he was a diabetic and he didn't feel the facility was following a diabetic diet, since he was getting two Danishes at a time at breakfast. Observation on 08/23/23 of tray line from 12:40 P.M. to 1:27 P.M. revealed there was no spreadsheets, and the residents on a carbohydrate consistent diet received the same diet as the regular diet, which consisted of pork loin with gravy, mashed potatoes, cauliflower, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus included a variety of food and failed to ensure menus and recipes were followed. This affected all residents except Resident #35 who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 65. Finding include: 1. Review of the menu for week two revealed chicken for dinner on Sunday and Monday and for lunch on Tuesday. Review of the renal menu for week two revealed turkey sandwiches for lunch on Sunday and Thursday and for dinner on Tuesday and Wednesday. Interview on 12/06/22 at 12:00 P.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #451 verified the main menu had chicken for three consecutive days. DM #451 stated that was why she switched today's lunch to Sloppy joes. DM #451 verified the renal menu had turkey sandwiches repeatedly on the menu. DM #451 stated she had heard residents complain of the lack of variety on the menu. 2. Observation of tray line on 12/06/22 at 12:08 P.M. revealed the regular Sloppy [NAME] was served using a green handled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, policy and procedure review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control guidelines, the facility failed to ensure all employees were administered a baseline Tuberculosis (TB) test on hire. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's TB risk assessment revealed the facility was a low risk classification. Review of the personnel file for the Administrator revealed a hire date of 08/10/22. There was no evidence a tuberculosis test was administered prior to starting work. Review of the personnel file for Dietary Manager #451 revealed a hire date of 06/21/22. There was no evidence a tuberculosis test was administered prior to starting work. Review of the personnel file for Admissions Director #445 revealed a hire date of 04/25/22. There was no evidence a tuberculosis test was administered prior to starting work. Review of the personnel file for Social Service Designee #438 revealed a hire date of 09/23/22. There was no evidence a tuberculosis test was administered prior to starting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based observation and interview the facility failed to maintain comfortable temperature levels. This affected five (Residents #13, #17, #28, #31 and #44) of 15 residents whose rooms were observed for comfortable temperatures. Findings include: Interviews and observations on 12/04/22 from 10:49 A.M. to 11:25 A.M. with Residents #13, #17, #28, #31 and #44 revealed their rooms were cold. Resident #13 was observed lying in bed under the blankets wearing a hoodie and long sleeve shirt. Resident #17 was observed wearing a winter hat, coat and gloves seated in a wheelchair. Resident #28 was observed sitting in wheelchair wearing a long sleeve shirt. Resident #31 was observed lying in bed under the blankets wearing gloves and a winter hat. Resident #44 was observed lying in bed with two blankets covered from his face to toes. All residents stated the rooms were always cold, that staff knew about it but did not do anything about it. Observations and temperature checks on 12/04/22 from 11:28 A.M. to 11:50 A.M. with the Maintenance Director revealed temperatures measured 68 to 70 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the pureed sloppy joe was properly prepared and of the correct consistency. This had the potential to affect 13 residents (#4, #6, #10, #20, #22, #26, #29, #39, #41, #46, #52, #74, and #119) of 13 residents who received a pureed diet. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Observation on 12/06/22 at 11:31 A.M. revealed Dietary Staff (DS) #410 wash her hands and obtain the temperature of the cooked, Sloppy [NAME]. Observation of the robot coupe (food processor) revealed it was clean and dry. DS #410 poured the Sloppy [NAME] into the robot coupe, added hot water and six slices of bread then blended the mixture. At 11:35 A.M., DS #410 stopped the robot coupe and stated the it was done. DS #410 poured the finished Sloppy [NAME] into a small steam table pan. The Sloppy [NAME] appeared chunky, and a taste test revealed the Sloppy [NAME] was chunky with bites of meat. At this time Dietary Manager (DM) #451 tasted the sloppy joe and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident meal choices were obtained consistently. This affected 13 residents (#11, #14, #17, #18, #23, #32, #36, #42, #58, #59, #61, #63, and #76) and had the potential to affect all residents except Resident #35 who received nothing by mouth. Findings include: Observation of the lunch meal on 12/04/22 between 12:35 P.M. and 12:38 P.M. revealed Residents #14, #17, #23, #32, #36, #42, #59, and #76 were served chips, deli sandwich, and fruit cup. Interviews during this time with the residents revealed sometimes they received a menu and could choose between the main meal and an alternate. All stated they did not get that option on this date. They also complained there was a lack of food variety. Resident #17 stated he was not happy with what he received to eat for lunch. Interview on 12/04/22 at 3:32 P.M. with Dietary Staff (DS) #450 revealed residents usually received a menu for lunch and dinner with their breakfast trays so they could choose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents except Residents #4, #6, #10, #20, #22, #26, #29, #39, #41, #46, #52, #74, and #119 who received a pureed diet and Resident #35 who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Observation of tray line on 12/06/22 at 12:12 P.M. revealed Dietary Staff (DS) #410 with gloved hands use a red and black plunger to pick up a metal hot pellet, place the pellet on an insulated bottom, then place a plate on top. DS #410 then opened the steamer with the same gloved hands, picked up a scoop to scoop a serving of pureed carrots that was in the steamer, and then finished making the pureed plate. Continued observation revealed DS #410 with the same gloved hands take a bun from a bag of buns and make a Sloppy [NAME] sandwich for a regular diet plate. DS #410 continued to prepare plates in the same manner without changing gloves or washing hands.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Long Term Care Ombudsman received copies of hospital transfer notices. This affected two residents (#13 and #66) of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 06/24/22. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe), acute kidney failure with tubular necrosis, hydronephrosis with ureteral stricture, major depressive disorder, and stroke. Review of the quarterly minimal data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, extensive assistance of staff for transfer and toilet use, and supervision with set-up help for eating. Review of the nurses note dated 09/21/22 at 7:58 P.M. revealed Resident #13's labs returned and the physician was notified of the results with critical values. Resident 13's physician gave a new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed for hospice and dialysis services. This affected Resident #45 who received hospice services and Resident #63 who received dialysis services. This affected one (Resident #45) of one resident reviewed for hospice and one (Resident #63) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an initial admission date of 08/26/22. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, hypertension, hypothyroidism, unspecified, muscle weakness, and vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition, required total dependence for one staff for bed mobility and eating, total dependence of two staff for transfers, and was receiving hospice services. Review of the nurses note dated 10/04/22 at 10:37 A.M. revealed Resident #45 had an increase…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, interview and review of manufacturer instructions the facility failed to ensure Resident #32 was prompted or assisted to rinse mouth with water and expectorate to help reduce the risk of orophayrngeal yeast infection after administration of inhaled medication. This affected one (Resident #32) of five residents observed during medication administration. The census was 65. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 08/25/20. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, vascular dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of bronchus or lung. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/07/22, Resident #32 had intact cognition and required supervision for locomotion. Review of Resident #32's physician order dated 07/16/22 revealed an order to use a Breo Ellipta inhaler daily for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Observation on 12/04/22 at 9:13 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #461 administering Breo Ellipta inhaler to Resident #32. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#52) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 10/29/22. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition, required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility and toilet use, total dependence of two staff for transfers, and supervision with set-up help for eating, and used oxygen. Review of Resident #52's December 2022 physician orders revealed orders to change oxygen tubing every week on Sunday on 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shift dated 10/30/22. Observation on 12/04/22 at 12:00 P.M. revealed Resident #52 in bed receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis assessments were completed for one resident (Resident #63). This affected one of one resident (Resident #63) reviewed for dialysis and one of eight resident reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 09/14/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, anemia and hepatitis. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 had intact cognition, required limited assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toilet use and supervision and set up help to eat. Review of the physician orders for November 2022 revealed Resident #63 received dialysis Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Review of the dialysis communication forms from 09/16/22 through 12/05/22 revealed no pre dialysis assessment was completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented the rational when pharmacy recommendations were not accepted and no medication changes were made. This affected two out of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #5 and Resident #8). The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 05/13/22. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, hypothyroidism, anxiety and diabetes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #5's physician's orders for December 2022 revealed an order for Ondanestron (Zofran) 4 milligrams (mg), a medication used to prevent nausea, to be given every eight hours as needed, and an order for Miralax 17 grams (gm), a medication to provide relief from constipation, was ordered every 24 hours as needed. Both orders had a start date on 05/13/22. Review of pharmacist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled with name of medication, expiration date, and cautionary instructions as applicable. This had the potential to affect 34 (Resident #2, #4, #5, #6, #7, #10, #11, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #22, #25, #26, #27, #29, #30, #34, #35, #37, #41, #45, #46, #49, #51, #54, #55, #57, #58, #61, #63, and Resident #219) of 34 residents residing on the [NAME] unit. The census was 65. Findings include: Observations of medication administration on 11/04/22 at 8:59 A.M. revealed a medication cup filled with 12 medications inside the medication cart for the [NAME] unit. Interview at time of observation with Registered Nurse (RN) #458 revealed she could not identify the medications in the cup or who the medications were for. RN #458 stated the cup was in the top drawer from the night before. Interview on 12/05/22 at 3:22 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she looked up the medication based on the numbers printed on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #39 and #48's comprehensive assessments were accurate. This finding affected two (Residents #39 and #48) of twenty-one resident records reviewed. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including supranuclear palsy, Parkinson's disease and chronic low back pain. Review of Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment was on hospice services and was not coded for a life expectancy of less than six months. Review of Resident #39's physician order dated 10/15/19 indicated to admit the resident to hospice services with a diagnosis of supranuclear palsy, and the resident's prognosis was six months or less provided the disease followed its expected progression. Interview on 11/13/19 at 8:22 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #801 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor Resident #30's bowel movements and follow the facility bowel protocol ordered per her physician. This affected one resident (Resident #30) of one resident reviewed for constipation. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of medical record revealed Resident #30 had an admission date 08/18/16 with diagnoses of multiple sclerosis, constipation, quadriplegia, adult failure to thrive, reduced mobility, and supraventricular tachycardia. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #30 revealed she had impaired cognition and was totally dependent of two people with bed mobility and toileting. Transfers and locomotion did not occur. Review of care plan dated 08/18/16 for Resident #30 revealed she was at risk for impaired bowel elimination related to history of constipation. Interventions included; monitor bowel movements daily, monitor for bloating, lower abdominal pain, fecal impaction and report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #21's oxygen was administered per the physician orders. This affected one (Resident #21) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care and had the potential to affect four additional residents (Residents #16, #37, #45, and #50) who required oxygen therapy. The facility census is 54. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/16/19 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute cholecystitis, protein calorie malnutrition, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and a pacemaker. Review of Resident #21's physician orders revealed an order dated 07/17/19 for oxygen to be administered at four liters per minute via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #21's respiratory care plan revealed an intervention dated 07/29/19 for staff to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician. Observation on 11/12/19 at 10:04 A.M. revealed Resident #21 sitting in a recliner in his room wearing a nasal cannula, and the dial on the oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0839 — isolated
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNA) provided care within their scope of practice. This finding affected one (Resident #21) of four residents reviewed for oxygen therapy and had the potential to affect four additional residents (Residents #16, #37, #45, and #50) who required oxygen therapy. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/16/19 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute cholecystitis, protein calorie malnutrition, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and a pacemaker. Review of Resident #21's physician orders revealed an order dated 07/17/19 for oxygen to be administered at four liters via minute by nasal cannula. Review of Resident #21's respiratory care plan revealed an intervention dated 07/29/19 for staff to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician. Observation on 11/13/19 at 2:14 P.M. revealed Resident #21 was sitting in a specialized chair in his room wearing an oxygen nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-11-14 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #39, #45 and #51 and/or the resident's representative were notified in writing the reason for the discharge to the hospital in an easily understood language. This finding affected three (Residents #39, #45 and #51) of three resident records reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, hypertension and low back pain. Review of Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] confirmed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #39's progress notes from [DATE] to [DATE] revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital and admitted on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection. The resident was transferred to the hospital and admitted on [DATE] and returned to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-11-14 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #39, #45 and #51 and/or the resident's representative were provided written notice of the bed-hold policy and reserve bed payment at the time of transfer or within twenty-four hours of transfer to the hospital. This finding affected three (Residents #39, #45 and #51) of three resident records reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, hypertension and low back pain. Review of Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] confirmed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #39's progress notes from [DATE] to [DATE] revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital and admitted on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection. The resident was transferred to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$46,963 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $46,963 — penalty dated 2025-07-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BLUMENKRANTZ, YITZCHOKIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST12%since 12/31/2013
BRECHER, IRVINGIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/31/2013
BRECHER, MENDELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/31/2013
GOLDSTEIN, JEFFERYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 12/31/2013
SCHLESINGER, ERNESTIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 12/31/2013
SHERMAN, ISRAELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 12/31/2013
WEISS, JACOBIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST9%since 12/31/2013
BARTLETT, THERESAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/16/2013
SHERMAN, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2013

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$574K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 12%Medicare 4%Other / private 85%

This home reported $574K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$326per resident / day
operating cost
$9,898per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$312per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365784. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next