Kenton Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
117 Jacob Parrott Boulevard, Kenton, OH 43326 · For profit - Individual · 125 certified beds · (419) 674-4197 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.5% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 19.1% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.0% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 36.4% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.1% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.9% | 8.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.0% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.8% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.36 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.01 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.4%CMS range 34.6–63.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.5–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 5.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.5–10.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 89.3 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain comfortable temperatures throughout the building for Residents #2, #5, #24, #28 and #47. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Observation and interview on 05/05/26 at 2:27 P.M. revealed Residents #5, #24, and #28 were complaining it was cold in the dining area. Maintenance #166 checked the room temperature of the dining area with a digital thermometer with a result of 64.1 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Maintenance #166 verified the dining area's room temperature was 64.1 F. Interviews with Residents #5, #24, and #28 revealed all three residents were cold, even with two layers of clothing on in the dining area. Resident #5 was wearing a coat as well.Interview on 05/07/26 at 8:04 A.M. revealed Resident #47 stopped this surveyor and Director of Nursing (DON) stating the facility was so cold. Resident #47 was in the entry common area with a sweater on and a blanket.Observations and interview on 05/07/26 from 9:00 A.M. to 9:25 A.M. with the Administrator revealed room temperatures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the walls in resident rooms were maintained in a functional and comfortable manner. This affected five (#2, #8, #41, #50, and #82) of 25 residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Observation on 05/06/26 at 2:30 P.M. of Resident #2's room revealed pieces of drywall missing from the wall which appeared clawed out by the resident.Observation on 05/06/26 at 2:32 P.M. of Resident #41's room revealed scrapes up and down the wall consistent with damage from the bed being repeatedly raised and lowered against the wall.Observation on 05/06/26 at 2:33 P.M. of Resident #8's room revealed pieces of drywall coming off the wall behind the resident's chair.Observation on 05/06/26 at 2:34 P.M. of Resident #82's room revealed wallpaper torn off the wall.Observation on 05/06/26 at 2:35 P.M. of Resident #50's room revealed drywall missing from the wall beside the resident's bed.Interview on 05/06/26 at 2:46 P.M. with Maintenance Director #166 confirmed the drywall and wallpaper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were at risk for falls had the care planned fall interventions in place. This affected two (#29 and #82) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 91.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 02/12/26. Diagnoses included fracture of left femur, psychosis, anxiety, repeated falls, restlessness and agitation, and irritability and anger. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 had moderately impaired cognition and had no behaviors during the seven day look back period.Review of Resident #29's physician orders dated 02/12/26 revealed an order to place dycem (non-slip material used to secure objects) to wheelchair every shift for fall prevention.Review of the care plan dated 04/19/26 revealed Resident #29 was at risk for falls related to history of falls, poor balance, seizure disorder, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure the facility environment temperatures were maintained at a comfortable level. This had the potential to affect 24 (#113, #68, #109, #18, #83, #58, #25, #17, #39, #80, #96, #50, #27, #48, #33, #42, #63, #12, #89, #93, #61, #21, #86 and #91) residents residing on the 300 hall. The census was 106 Findings include: Observation and interview on 06/17/24 at 12:06 P.M. with Resident #12 revealed the resident stated her room was too be hot and stuffy. The lighted clock on her wall revealed a temperature reading of 86 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Observations and interview on 06/17/24 at 12:12 revealed the Administrator had taken an infrared temperature in the 300 hall which was 80.4 degrees F and the temperature in Resident #12's room was between 84 degrees F to 86 degrees F. The Administrator confirmed the air conditioning unit had been out for sometime, but stated the facility was scheduled to get a new roof tip air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary orders were followed. This affected one (#16) of three residents reviewed for dietary preferences. The facility census was 106. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #16 revealed admission date of 07/24/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including arthritis, Congestive Heart Failure, and depression. The resident remained in the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she/he had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. He required set up assistance for eating, moderate assistance for toileting hygiene, bed mobility and was dependent for transfers. Review of the physician orders revealed a diet order for a Controlled Carb diet, Regular texture, Regular consistency with double protein with a start date of 09/13/23. Observation on 06/18/24 at 12:20 P.M. of the meal ticket for Resident #16 revealed the meal should be double…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the daily staffing posting, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to post current nurse staffing information. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Observation on 07/24/23 at 4:22 P.M. revealed four daily staff postings for 05/12/23, 05/13/23, 05/14/23, and 05/15/23 posted on the window next to the main entrance of the facility. Observation on 07/25/23 at 8:01 A.M. revealed the daily staff postings for 05/12/23, 05/13/23, 05/14/23, and 05/15/23 remained in place. Interview on 07/25/23 at 10:24 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility posted staffing information on the door to the main entrance. The DON verified the staff postings of 05/12/23, 05/13/23, 05/14/23, and 05/15/23 were outdated and needed to be updated. Review of the facility policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised August 2006, revealed the facility will post the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical restraints. This affected one (Resident #34) of one resident reviewed for physical restraints. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included convulsions, cerebrovascular disease, myoneural disorder, muscle weakness, dementia, epilepsy, cognitive communication deficit, convulsions, anxiety, and depression. Review of Resident #34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating the resident was cognitively impaired. Further review revealed the resident required extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting with incontinence of bowel and bladder. There was no documentation indicating the use of physical restraints. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete an accurate assessment to reflect a resident's current status. This affected one (Resident #82) of one resident reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 01/10/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dependence on renal dialysis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #82 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Further review revealed the resident required supervision for walking in his room and corridor. Interview on 07/25/23 at 8:50 A.M. with Resident #82 revealed he was unable to walk since he came to the facility. Interview on 07/26/23 at 8:12 A.M. with Therapy Manager #400 revealed Resident #82 was receiving therapy upon his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop accurate care plans to reflect residents' current status. This affected two (Residents #40 and #34) of three reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 100. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 07/14/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dependence on dialysis, type two diabetes mellitus, depression, and Rheumatoid Arthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident was independent with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Further review revealed Resident #40 had likely cavity or broken teeth. Additionally, the resident was documented as having pain. Review of the dental note dated 05/05/23 revealed Resident #40 had tooth decay and was referred to an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a dependent resident with grooming needs. This affected one (Resident #74) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed, Resident #74 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Huntington's chorea, Alzheimer's dementia, Parkinson's disease, adult failure to thrive, aphasia, musculoskeletal impairment, gastrostomy tube, depression, and anxiety. Review of Resident #74's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognitive skills for daily decision making was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score unable to be obtained. Resident #74 required total dependence of two staff for activities of daily living, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and bathing. Review of Resident #74's plan of care dated 02/18/23 revealed the resident had an Activities of Daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement fall interventions to potentially prevent falls. This affected one (Resident #90) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date 03/07/23. Diagnoses included traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, syncope and collapse, hearing loss bilateral, dementia, dysphagia, Alzheimer's Disease with late onset, and fall. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 had severely impaired cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, walk in room, and dressing. The resident required extensive assistance of two persons for transfers. The resident had one fall with no injury since admission, reentry, or prior assessment. Review of the nursing note dated 07/03/23 at 1:30 P.M. revealed Resident #90 was wandering in front of the building in the main common…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly administer medications via enteral gastrostomy tube. This affected one (Resident #74) of one resident reviewed for medication administration via gastrostomy tube. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #74 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Huntington's chorea, Alzheimer's dementia, Parkinson's disease, adult failure to thrive, aphasia, musculoskeletal impairment, gastrostomy tube, depression, and anxiety. Review of Resident #74's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired with never or rarely making decisions. Further review revealed the resident required total dependence of two staff for activities of daily living including dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, bathing, with total dependence of one staff for intake of nourishment, and functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow fluid restrictions. This affected one (Resident #23) of one resident reviewed for fluid restrictions. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 08/13/20. Medical diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), dependence on renal dialysis, diabetes mellitus, and non-compliance with medical regimen or treatment. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #23 had an order for a renal diet, with double portions. Additionally, a fluid restriction was ordered for Resident #23 on 06/14/22. The order stated Resident #23 was to be restricted to 1200 milliliters (ml) fluid intake daily. 720 ml total is to be provided by dietary each day, and 480 ml to be provided by nursing daily. The amount provided by nursing was further divided with 360 ml to be provided by nursing staff on the 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. day shift, and 120 ml to be provided by nursing staff on the 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. night shift. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #13) of one resident reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/18/20. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease stage 3, mild cognitive impairment, alcohol abuse and dysphagia. Review of Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #13's Plan of Care (POC) dated 06/24/22 revealed Resident #13 utilized psychotropic medications with interventions to administer psychotropic medications as ordered by physician, monitor for side effects and effectiveness every shift. Review of Resident #13's physician orders revealed an order dated 04/14/22 for Haldol Decanoate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, review of manufacturer information for insulin, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials were labeled with resident names and staff could decipher opening dates vs expiration dates. This had the potential to affect three (Residents #30, #23, and #22) of three residents who received insulin from the 100 medication cart. The facility census was 100. Findings include: Observation on 07/27/23 at 8:01 A.M. of the 100 medication cart revealed five opened bottles of insulin in the top drawer: Humulin R dated 07/25/23, Novolog dated 07/11/23, Humalog dated 07/10/23 and Lispro dated 07/23/23 did not obtain the resident's name, open date, or expiration date. Lantus dated 07/21/23, expiration 08/21/23 did not obtain the resident's name. Interview on 07/27/23 at approximately 8:01 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #229 revealed the inability to determine which bottle of insulin belonged to which resident. LPN #229 further stated the inability to distinguish if the dates labeled on the bottles were opening dates or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control procedures for a resident with Clostridium difficile (C-diff). This affected one (Resident #298) and had the potential to affect 26 residents who resided on the 100 hall. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed during medication administration. This affected one (Resident #346) of five reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 100. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #398 revealed an admission date of 07/22/23. Medical diagnoses included recurrent Enterocolitis (inflammation of the inner lining of the small and large intestines) due to Clostridium difficile (C-diff, a bacteria that causes diarrhea and inflammation of the colon), intestine transplant status, and arthritis. Resident #398 had a sign on their door to see nurse before entering, contact isolation precautions were in place. Resident #398 resided on the 100-hall. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to properly label and date opened food items in the upright kitchen refrigerator. This had potential to affect 87 of 88 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (Resident #21) did not receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the facility's kitchen on 02/10/20 from 8:10 A.M. through 9:30 A.M., revealed an upright refrigerator with an opened block of cheese uncovered set in the original wrapper with no date, a bowl of noodles undated and unlabeled, a container of a dark gravy or meat like substance unlabeled and undated, and a small personal size container of ice cream in the refrigerator. Interview on 02/10/20 at 8:25 A.M. with Kitchen Manager #550 verified the opened block of cheese, undated and unlabeled bowl of noodles, and undated and unlabeled container of dark gravy or meat like substance and ice cream in the refrigerator. Kitchen Manager #550 immediately threw away the ice cream and removed the bowl of noodles. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of facility's maintenance documents, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to have appropriate Legionella monitoring. In addition, the facility failed to maintain infection control for one (Resident #26) of four residents observed for medication administration. This had the potential to affect all 89 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's monitoring control measures to prevent growth and spread of Legionella revealed no evidence of water temperatures being done in rooms or water heaters, no evidence of flushing of resident rooms/unused rooms, no evidence disinfectant level control, and no evidence of environmental testing for pathogens. Interview on 02/13/20 at 4:16 P.M. with Maintenance Supervisor #492 verified there was no evidence of Legionella prevention and Maintenance Supervisor #492 was not aware of the requirement until last month. Review of the facility's policy titled, Legionella Water Management Program, revised July 2017, revealed the water management program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 89 residents residing in the facility Findings include: 1. Observation of the smoking shelter house for resident use on 02/11/20 at 2:00 P.M. revealed multiple shingles had come off the shelter house and were scattered in the yard around the shelter house. It further revealed a large area on one side of the roof, approximately eight foot square had a bowed in, concave appearance, with the center of the area being more caved in. The underside of the roof from the inside of the shelter house revealed dark rings with open areas in the wood. This area was in close approximation to the deep concave area on the roof. Interview with Maintenance Supervisor #492 on 02/12/20 at 1:10 P.M. verified the roof to the smoking shelter had been leaking for over a year. He verified an area approximately eight foot long by eight foot wide was concave and multiple shingles were lying on the ground. He further verified the smoking shelter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner during meal times. This affected five residents (Resident #4, #9, #39, #4 #80) observed during meal time. The facility census was 89. Finding include: 1. Observation on 02/10/20 at 12:59 P.M. revealed State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #477 was assisting Resident #4 and Resident #80 eat lunch. STNA #477 alternated assisting Resident #4 and Resident #80 with spoonfuls of lunch walking back and forth alternating between residents and standing over them. At 1:02 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #410 began to assist and STNA #477 sat down with Resident #4 while LPN #410 stood above Resident #80 while assisting him with his meal. STNA #477 and LPN #410 discussed vacations and the soap opera on the television in the dining room. At 1:04 P.M., LPN #438 entered the room and brought a chair to LPN #410. Interview on 02/10/20 at 1:24 P.M. with LPN #410 verified LPN #410 and STNA #477 did stand while assisting Resident #4 and Resident #80 with their meal. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-13 · tag F0661 — patternEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility's policy and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with comprehensive discharge summaries with the required information upon discharge from the facility. This affected five residents (#136, #137, #138, #139, #141) of six residents reviewed for discharge. The facility identified 20 residents discharged from the facility in the last 60 days. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #137 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to home on [DATE]. Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, repeated falls, hypertension, anemia, muscle wasting, difficulty walking, joint pain, low back pain, allergic rhinitis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and urine retention. Review of the discharge return not anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/13/20, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of chemical warning labels, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to have safe storage of chemicals. This had the potential to affect nine residents (#32, #33, #51, #58, #32, #36, #49, #33 and #83) who were both cognitively impaired and independently mobile as identified by the facility. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Observation of the central Bath room on the 400 hall revealed the door was unlocked and partially opened. Further observation of a cart in the room revealed an opened container of Sani-cloth bleach germicidal wipes. The container had Caution keep out of reach of children on the label. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse #444 on 02/12/20 at 1:10 P.M. verified the central bath room was to be locked at all times. She further verified the sani germicidal wipes were a hazardous chemical that was supposed to be locked up at all times and should have been in a locked cabinet. 2. Observation on 02/11/20 at 8:52 A.M. of the central bath located on the 100-hallway revealed the door was not locked.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of manufacturer's recommendations and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly date and store medications. This affected two of three medication rooms and two of five medication carts. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Observation of the 100 hall medication room on [DATE] at 10:03 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #418 revealed in the refrigerator, there was one opened and undated vial of Tuberculin purified protein. RN #418 verified the Tuberculin purified protein was opened and undated. Observation of the 200 hall medication cart and the 200 hall medication storage room on [DATE] at 10:11 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #431 revealed one Albuterol duoneb (treats bronchospasm) vial in the top drawer of the medication cart not in its prescription package and one Bisacodyl (laxative) 10 milligrams (mg.) suppository not in its package. LPN #431 verified the Albuterol was not in a prescription package and Bisacodyl was not in its…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to provide reasonable privacy when a resident's door could not close and not shutting the window curtains when providing care. This affected two (Resident #76 and #85) of 26 residents observed in the initial and final sample pool. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #85 revealed an initial admission date of 01/29/20. Diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, Parkinson's disease, generalized anxiety disorder, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, polyneuropathy and visual hallucinations. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/05/20, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required extensive one person assistance with bed mobility, transferring, walking in room and corridor, locomotion off and on the unit, dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident and appropriate/required members of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) were invited to participate in the care planning process. This affected three (#8, #27, and #50) of four resident reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, muscle weakness, venous insufficiency, diabetes mellitus type two, muscle wasting and atrophy, personality disorder, chronic embolism, heart failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoarthritis, neuromuscular dysfunction of he bladder, Parkinson's disease, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, tremors, psychosis, morbid obesity, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete accurate, routinely wound assessments for Resident #73. This affected one (#73) of four residents reviewed for non-pressure wounds. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an initial admission date of 10/23/19. Diagnoses included hemiplegia/hemiparesis, end-stage renal disease, diabetes, morbid obesity, peripheral neuropathy, cellulitis and malignant neoplasm of the bone and articular cartilage. Review of the admission Clinic Health Status form, dated 10/23/19, revealed Resident #73 had a second toe plantar side ulcer and redness of the coccyx noted on the skin assessment. The body diagram identified the toe ulcer on the left foot. There was no other wound assessment information included for the coccyx wound or the foot wound. The resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview; the facility failed to obtain physician orders and provide care and services for a resident's indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one (#137) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheter. The facility identified eight residents with indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #137 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included muscle wasting, lower back pain and retention of urine. Review of the admission assessment, dated 02/08/20, revealed Resident #137 was admitted to the facility with an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the medical record for Resident #137, which included admission orders, physician telephone orders, progress notes, the medication and treatment records, dated 02/2020, the 48-hour baseline care plan, and nurse aid activities of daily living tracking form dated 02/2020 revealed there was no evidence of care and services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to timely implement nutritional recommendations for the residents. This affected two (#23 and #71) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility censes was 89. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 12/16/19. Diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease, delirium, dementia, major depressive disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/01/20, revealed the Resident #23 required set up assistance for eating and substantial to maximal assistance for oral hygiene. Review of the care plan, dated 12/24/19, revealed the resident had imbalanced nutrition related to poor intake. Interventions included the facility would provide and serve supplements as ordered. The care plan was not updated to include the recommendations from 01/30/20 to 02/12/20. Review of the facility's form titled Medical Nutritional Therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to change oxygen supplies as physician ordered. This affected one (#8) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified 10 residents who receive respiratory care. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and morbid obesity. Review of the plan of care, with implementation date of 10/23/14 with a target date of 02/21/20, revealed the resident had ineffective breathing pattern related to COPD and a history of pneumonia and as evidenced by cough, abnormal lung sounds, and a drop in oxygen saturation during rest and activity. Interventions included continuous oxygen at four liters per minute per nasal cannula and change oxygen supplies every week on Thursday. Review of the treatment administration record (TAR), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, review of the facility's policy and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a pharmacy recommendation and physician order. In addition, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the resident's bedside. This affected one resident (#1) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and affected one (#26) of 26 residents observed on the initial and final sample. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 08/08/19. Diagnosis included heart failure, type two diabetes, dysphagia, urgency of urination, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and essential hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/12/19, revealed the resident had intact cognition and no behaviors exhibited in the seven-day look-back period. Review of the pharmacy recommendation, dated 10/30/19, for Omeprazole (treats heartburn) 20 milligrams (mg.) capsule to be given by mouth daily and to be taken 30 minutes before meals.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate less than 5%. There were three medication errors out of 32 opportunities, which was a 9.38% medication error rate. This affected two (#26 and #76) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Observation of medication administration on 02/11/20 at 8:22 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #418 revealed she completed an accucheck with a result of 183 for Resident #76's blood sugar level. RN #418 then obtained medications for Resident #76, including Novolog insulin per flexpen, two units and one multivitamin tablet. RN #418 verified all the medications, then administered Resident #76's medications, including the multivitamin tablet and the insulin per subcutaneous injection at his right mid-abdomen. Review of the most recent recapitulated physician orders, dated 01/22/20 and signed by the physician on 01/28/20, revealed Novolog Flexpen administration to inject subcutaneously per sliding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtained physician ordered laboratory blood tests. This affected one (#8) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, muscle weakness, venous insufficiency, diabetes mellitus type two, muscle wasting and atrophy, personality disorder, chronic embolism, heart failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), osteoarthritis, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, Parkinson's disease, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, tremors, psychosis, morbid obesity, and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician orders, dated 12/30/19, revealed Resident #8 was to have the laboratory test prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (PT/INR) completed on 01/02/20. (PT/INR is laboratory blood tested used to help detect and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to clean and store dishes and utensils under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect 92 residents of 92 residents receiving their meals from the facility kitchen. Residents #15 and #67 did not receive meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Observations of dish washing on 03/06/19 at 11:17 A.M. revealed Dietary Aid (DA) #222 was handling dirty dishes, rinsing them with water then loading them in trays to wash them in the facility dish machine. DA #222 proceeded to run the dish machine until the were three trays of clean dishes on the clean side of the dish machine. DA #222 then proceeded to clean dishes on the other side of the dish machine without washing her hands. DA #222 emptied the clean dishes from the trays and stacked them for resident use. The dishes included plastic plate holders and metal plate holders that were still wet from the dish machine. RA #222 stacked the metal and plastic plate holders in an up-right position while they were still…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity during their dining experience. This affected one (Resident #30) of three residents observed receiving assistance in the dementia unit dining room. The facility identified 12 residents who were dependent on staff for eating. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/13. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dependence on a wheelchair, mental disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #30's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/06/19, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 indicating Resident #30 was unable to complete the interview. Resident #30 was totally dependent on eating and displayed no behaviors during the review period. Interview on 03/05/19 at 3:08 P.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #200 revealed Resident #30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Advanced Directives listed in the medical record were accurate for Resident #73. This affected one (Resident #73) of 32 residents review for Advanced Directives. The facility census was 94. Findings Include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/03/18. Diagnoses included pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, altered mental status, disorientation, schizophrenia, paranoid personality disorder, alcohol dependence with withdrawal, encephalopathy, bipolar disorder and depressive disorder Review of Resident #73's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/28/19, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #73's current care plan, dated 11/09/18, listed the resident as a full code. Review of Resident #73's physician order, dated 11/03/18, revealed an order for full code. Review of Resident #73's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated March 2019 under Advanced Directives listed the resident as a full code. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for a resident. This affected one (Resident #73) of six residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/03/18. Diagnoses included pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, altered mental status, disorientation, schizophrenia, paranoid personality disorder, alcohol dependence with withdrawal, encephalopathy, bipolar disorder and depressive disorder Review of Resident #73's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/28/19, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The assessment listed the resident as having schizophrenia, bipolar, and depressive disorder. Review of the form titled Hospital Exemption from Preadmission Screening ([NAME]) dated 11/02/18 revealed a diagnosis of schizophrenia. No level two screening had been completed. Interview on 03/07/19 at 2:00 P.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-07 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of social services job description, the facility failed to provide social services to assist in identifying a guardian for a cognitively impaired resident for decision making needs. This affected one (Resident #73) of one resident reviewed for social services. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/03/18. Diagnoses included pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, altered mental status, disorientation, schizophrenia, paranoid personality disorder, alcohol dependence with withdrawal, encephalopathy, bipolar disorder and depressive disorder Review of Resident #73's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/28/19, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The assessment listed the resident as having schizophrenia, bipolar, and depressive disorder. Review of Resident #73's care plan, dated 11/09/18, under discharge planning listed the resident will be discharged to home. The resident had impaired cognition related to mental illness.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to properly administer medications to residents. This affected two (Resident #40 and #54) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Observation of the medication pass on 03/06/19 at 7:28 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 administered vilanterol/Fluticasone furoate (Breo Ellipta) (corticosteriod) 25 micrograms (mcg.) with 100 mcg. per inhalation to Resident #40 and did not instruct the resident to rinse his mouth with water and spit it out. Interview on 03/06/19 at 7:28 A.M. with LPN #200 further verified she had not instructed Resident #40 to rinse his mouth and spit after the administration of the inhaled medication. Observation of the medication pass on 03/06/19 at 7:41 A.M. revealed LPN #210 administered Flovent HFA (corticosteriod) 220 mcg. inhalation, one inhalation, to Resident #54 and did not instruct the resident to rinse and spit afterward. Interview on 03/06/19 at 7:44 A.M. with LPN #210 verified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide residents who required mechanically altered diets with meals of the proper texture. This affected one (Resident #7) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified 10 residents who received a mechanically altered diet. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/12/18. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, type II diabetes, muscle weakness, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, neuropathy, pseudo bulbar affect and muscle spasms. Review of Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/22/19, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating Resident #7 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #7 received a mechanically altered and therapeutic diet. Resident #7 was totally dependent on staff for eating. Review of Resident #37's care plan updated 02/09/19 revealed supports and interventions for nutrition and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during medication administration when nursing touched oral medications intended for oral administration. This affected two (Resident #40 and #54) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Observation of the medication pass on 03/06/19 at 7:28 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 touched the Buspar (antianxiety) five milligram (mg.) tablet and the Venlafaxine (antidepressant) 37.5 mg. tablet, intended for Resident #40, with her bare hands. She approached Resident #40 with the medications and was stopped by this surveyor before administering the contaminated medications. Interview on 03/06/19 at 7:28 A.M. with LPN #200 provided verification of the break of infection control practices when she touched the Buspar and Venlafaxine. Observation of the medication pass on 03/06/19 at 7:41 A.M. revealed LPN #210 touched the aspirin 81 mg. tablets intended for administration to Resident #54. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-03-07 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and review of facility bed capacity, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Social Worker (LSW) was employed by the facility. This had the potential to affect all 94 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's bed capacity revealed the facility was certified for 125 beds. Interview on 03/06/19 at 2:03 P.M. with Director of Social Services Registered Nurse (RN) #408 stated she provides any needed social services for the residents. RN #408 stated the facility has one LSW that visits the facility once a week. Interview on 03/07/19 at 2:00 P.M. with RN #406 verified the facility does not have a LSW on staff and the facility has been having difficulty finding a LSW.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERENITY EQUITY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 16% | since 09/18/2017 |
| ZW AOM RE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 16% | since 09/18/2017 |
| GOLDSTEIN, JEFFERY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 21% | since 01/15/2024 |
| SHERMAN, ALEXANDER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 17% | since 01/15/2024 |
| HOROWITZ, ZALEMAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 09/18/2017 |
| WAGSCHAL, ZALMAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 16% | since 09/18/2017 |
| HUSTON, SHARON | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/18/2017 |
| SHERMAN, SAMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/18/2017 |
| AOM HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/18/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $638K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365843. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-07-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.