Eagle Pointe Skilled Nursing & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 54.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2019-10-21 · tag F0608 — failed to report suspected crimes — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure (1) employees report any suspicion of a crime against any resident, according to timelines; (2) post the notice of employee rights; and (3) prohibit and prevent retaliation for reporting.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, facility investigation, and associated investigation documents, the facility policy titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, and The Elder Justice Act and Reporting Suspected Crimes Against Residents, and interview with staff the facility failed to implement the facility abuse policy following an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the likelihood of serious physical and emotional harm for one cognitively impaired resident (Resident #38) when the administrator became aware of an allegation of sexual abuse by a resident with known sexual behaviors (Resident #47) and failed to report the allegation to local authorities. This affected one of five residents reviewed relative to investigations of physical or sexual abuse. The facility identified 12 additional cognitively impaired residents the alleged perpetrator had access to (Residents #5, #11, #21, #24, #25, #26, #30, #33, #35, #40, #41, and #196). The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2019-10-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, facility investigation, and associated investigation documents, the facility policy titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, and The Elder Justice Act and Reporting Suspected Crimes Against Residents, and interview with staff the facility failed to implement the facility abuse policy following an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the likelihood of serious physical and emotional harm for one cognitively impaired resident (Resident #38) when the administrator became aware of an allegation of sexual abuse by a resident with known sexual behaviors (Resident #47) and failed to report the allegation to the State Agency as required. This affected one of five residents reviewed relative to investigations of physical or sexual abuse. The facility identified 12 additional cognitively impaired residents the alleged perpetrator had access to (Residents #5, #11, #21, #24, #25, #26, #30, #33, #35, #40, #41, and #196).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2019-10-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, facility investigation, and associated investigation documents, the facility policy titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, and The Elder Justice Act and Reporting Suspected Crimes Against Residents, and interview with staff, resident, and resident families the facility failed to implement their abuse policy following an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the likelihood of serious physical and emotional harm for one cognitively impaired resident (Resident #38) when the administrator became aware of an allegation of sexual abuse by a resident with known sexual behaviors (Resident #47) and failed to ensure adequate monitoring of the alleged resident perpetrator, thoroughly investigate the allegation and report the allegation to law enforcement and the State Agency. This affected one of five residents reviewed relative to investigations of physical or sexual abuse. The facility identified 12 additional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-01-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of psychotropic medication information, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for Resident #26 when the resident's psychotropic medication, for reducing risk of recurrent suicidal behavior with schizophrenia was not administered as ordered by the physician from 11/20/23 until 12/06/23. The facility also failed to ensure the physician was notified timely that the medication was unavailable for administration. Actual Harm occurred on 12/07/23 when Resident #26 was admitted to the hospital with psychosis (having increased behaviors and hallucinations), suicidal ideations, threatening to kill herself and slit her throat with a knife as a result of the missed doses of the psychotropic medication, Clozapine. This affected one resident (#26) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 52. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an initial admission date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts and resolve a resident grievance involving staff smelling of marijuana while providing care. This affected one resident (Resident #21) of two residents reviewed for resident concerns. The facility census was 53. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 07/15/23 with diagnoses including pan lobular emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), insomnia, dependence on respirator, muscle wasting, heart failure, type two diabetes, and anxiety. Review of the facility document titled Witness statement dated 03/19/26 and authored by Unit Manager (UM) #336 revealed Resident #21 notified UM #336 that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #315 and CNA #339 smelled like marijuana. UM #336 stated she could smell a faint odor and that the CNA did not appear impaired. UM #336 stated she spoke with CNA #315 and #339 and told them it was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-08 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on record review, interview, observation, self-reported incident (SRI) review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation. This affected five Residents (#20, #35, #46, #54, and #55) out of six residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 53.Findings include:1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 02/19/24. She passed away at the facility on 08/28/25. Her diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis, chronic pain, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 had intact cognition and was on a scheduled pain medication regimen that included opioids (medications prescribed to treat severe or persistent pain, but they can also be addictive). Review of July 2025 physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, review of a grievance form, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that care was provided in a manner that maintained the resident's dignity and honored the resident's right to be informed of and refuse treatment. This failure affected one resident (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 53.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including panlobular emphysema, acute and chronic respiratory failure, and severe morbid obesity.Review of a grievance form dated 11/10/25 revealed Resident #20 reported that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #625 used vinegar on him during his shower. The facility investigated the incident and educated CNA #625 on customer service and patient care. The grievance documentation indicated vinegar was not to be used with Resident #20 in the future, and CNA #625 was removed from his care assignment.Review of nurse's notes dated 11/01/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of a grievance form and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure treatments were provided in accordance with professional standards and failed to obtain a physician's order prior to administering a topical treatment. This resulted in vinegar being applied to Resident #20 without a physician's order and against the resident's expressed refusal. This deficient practice affected one (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for physician-ordered treatments. The facility census was 53.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #20 revealed he admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including panlobular emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), insomnia, congestive heart failure (CHF), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), Lupus anticoagulant syndrome, anemia, muscle wasting and atrophy, difficulty walking, pain, major depressive disorder, anxiety, iron deficiency, bilateral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure labs were obtained as ordered for Resident #5. This affected one resident (#5) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications/labs. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 02/25/23 with diagnoses including diabetes, dementia, hypertension, and seizures. Review of the lab work completed from 02/25/23 to 03/18/25 revealed there was no documented evidence a ferritin level (lab that indicated the amount of iron stored in the body) or a Keppra level (lab that monitored the anticonvulsant (seizure) drug level) was completed as ordered. A Vitamin D level was completed on 07/15/24 and was 17 indicating it was low (normal range was 30 to 100 nanograms (ng)/ milliliter (mL). There were no further Vitamin D levels noted on review. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had intact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice or account for experience and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of Resident #52's post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This affected one resident (#52) of two residents reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of PTSD, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, and anxiety disorder. Review of the undated comprehensive care plan revealed the absence of a care plan addressing PTSD or associated triggers and the absence of a psychosocial assessment for Resident #52. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #43 had adaptive equipment as ordered when eating. This affected one resident (#43) out of one resident reviewed for adaptive equipment when eating. This had the potential to affect seven residents (#5, #10, #11, #17, #30, #32, and #43) that had orders for adaptive equipment while eating. The facility census was 50. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 11/02/23 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, muscle weakness, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the March 2025 physician's orders revealed Resident #43 had an order dated 11/03/23 to have built-up utensils and a two handled mug for all meals. Review of the care plan dated 03/11/25 revealed Resident #43 had a nutritional problem related to excessive energy intake and self-feeding deficit which required adaptive equipment with meals. Interventions included occupational therapy screening and providing adaptive equipment for feeding including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure they had a three-day emergency supply of food as required. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents. The facility identified no residents as receiving nothing by mouth. The census was 54. Findings include: Observation during initial tour of the kitchen on 03/25/24 from 8:03 A.M. to 8:25 A.M. with Dietary [NAME] (DC) #355 and Dietary Aide (DA) #356 revealed a minimal supply of foods in dry and cold storage areas of the kitchen. The walk-in cooler and freezer revealed the shelves held minimal foods available to cook for the meals. The bread rack had multiple empty shelves with a few packages of bread products. There was no instant powdered milk or canned meat items available for an emergency food supply. Dietary Aide #356 at the time of observation confirmed the facility did not have a three-day emergency supply of food. Interview on 03/25/24 at 8:39 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #350 confirmed the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, review of facility records and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the low temperature dish machine was being appropriately monitored for levels of chemical sanitizer, and the kitchen was clean and sanitary. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents. The facility identified no residents as receiving nothing by mouth. The census was 54. Findings include: 1. Observation of the low temperature dish machine on 03/25/24 from 9:05 A.M. to 9:13 A.M. with Regional Director (RD) #353 revealed the dish machine had not met the recommended sanitation level of 50 parts per million (ppm) when RD #353 tested the dish machine's rinse water with a QAC QR Code 2951 sanitation test strip. The strip turned a pale green color which indicated the sanitizer level did not meet the sanitation level of 50 ppm. Further observation of the low temperature dish machine and interview on 03/25/24 at 2:15 P.M. with RD #353 revealed when RD #353 used a QAC QR Code 2951 test strip to test the sanitation level of the dish machine, the test strip turned a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was provided a reasonable accommodation to enter the facility and did not ensure Resident #50's wheelchair was serviced and repaired in a timely manner. This affected two residents (Residents #4 and #50) of two residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 02/22/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anemia, nicotine dependence, anxiety disorder and morbid obesity. Review of the smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was an unsupervised smoker, but required assistance getting outside in her wheelchair. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. She was totally dependent on two people for transfers and she required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, dressing and toilet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $704K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH