Meadowbrook Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 48.0 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-07-08 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of the facility Resident Transfer and Discharge Policy and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe discharge to an appropriate location for Resident #49. On 05/20/25 Resident #49 was discharged to a homeless shelter with no referral for follow up care, no access to transportation and no evidence the resident's representative/emergency contact was involved in the discharge planning process or aware of the resident's discharge to the homeless shelter. In addition, there was no evidence Resident #49 was safe to discharge to this location. Upon arrival to the shelter, staff at the shelter identified Resident #49 was not appropriate to remain there and the resident voiced she wanted to return to the facility; however, the facility failed to allow the resident to return. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for actual harm, injury or death beginning on 07/01/25 when Resident #49's, who had diagnoses including diabetes, chronic obstructive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and review of staffing schedules, the staffing tool and the facility assessment, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was in the facility at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents residing at the facility.Findings include: Review of staffing schedules from 01/01/26 to 04/21/26 revealed there was no RN coverage for at least eight consecutive hours on 01/24/26 and 04/05/26. Review of the staffing tool from 04/05/26 to 04/11/26 completed on 04/21/26 at 12:00 P.M. with Administrator, Human Resource (HR) #624, and Scheduler/HR Assistant #623 revealed there was no RN coverage for at least eight consecutive hours on 04/05/26. Interview on 04/21/26 at 12:00 P.M. and 1:47 P.M. with Administrator, HR #624, and Scheduler/HR Assistant #623 verified per the staffing schedules from 01/01/26 to 04/21/26 and the staffing tool completed from 04/05/26 to 04/11/26, there was no RN coverage for at least eight consecutive hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-04-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #268530, the state survey agency database for SRI reporting, the facility investigation and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse. This affected three residents (Resident #22, #53 and #54) out of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 50.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed she had an admission date of 06/06/25 and her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, and major depression. She had a friend listed as Power of Attorney (POA) for finance and per the facility the friend did not want involvement in her healthcare decisions. There was not a POA of healthcare and/or guardian listed. There was nothing in her medical record regarding if Resident #22 was evaluated whether she had the capacity to consent to sexual activity. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] (prior to incident) revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-04-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #268530, the state survey agency database for SRI reporting, the facility investigation and facility policy, the facility failed to report to the state survey agency and/or local law enforcement an allegation of sexual abuse. This affected two residents (Residents #22 and #53) out of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 50.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed she had an admission date of 06/06/25 and her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, and major depression. She had a friend listed as Power of Attorney (POA) for finance and per the facility the friend did not want involvement in her healthcare decisions. There was not a POA of healthcare and/or guardian listed. There was nothing in her medical record regarding if Resident #22 was evaluated whether she had the capacity to consent to sexual activity. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #268530, the facility investigation and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure preventative measures were implemented to prevent sexual abuse. This affected three residents (Residents #22, #53 and #54) out of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed she had an admission date of 06/06/25 and her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, and major depression. She had a friend listed as Power of Attorney (POA) for finance and per the facility the friend did not want involvement in her healthcare decisions. There was not a POA of healthcare and/or guardian listed. There was nothing in her medical record regarding if Resident #22 was evaluated whether she had the capacity to consent to sexual activity. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] (prior to incident) revealed Resident #22's Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #268530 and the facility investigation, the facility failed to ensure Resident #22 was provided medically related social service to attain the highest practicable wellbeing by seeking guardianship to assist with decision making. This affected one resident (Resident #22) out of six residents reviewed for social service needs. This had the potential to affect four residents (Residents #15, #18, #22 and #37) who were identified by the facility as residents unable to make informed decisions without a guardian and/or responsible party. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed she had an admission date of 06/06/25 and her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, and major depression. She had a friend listed as Power of Attorney (POA) for finance and per the facility the friend did not want involvement in her healthcare decisions. There was not a POA of healthcare and/or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors by providing residents with antibiotic (ATB) therapy in a timely manner and in accordance with physician orders. This affected two residents (Residents #39, and #51) out of three residents reviewed for ATB therapy. The facility census was 50.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 10/16/25 and he was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. His diagnoses on admission included enterocolitis due to Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff) (a highly contagious bacterium that causes severe diarrhea and inflammation of colon), hypertension, malignant neoplasm of the prostate, and chronic kidney disease.Review of October 2025 physician orders revealed Resident #51 had an order dated 10/16/25 for fidaxomicin (ATB) oral tablet 200 milligram (mg) give one tablet by mouth every morning and at bedtime for five days due to C-Diff.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) and investigation review, the facility failed to ensure a SRI was thoroughly investigated related to an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This affected two residents (#16 and #49) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 05/06/24. Diagnoses included dementia, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney disease, restlessness and agitation, and anxiety. Review of the care plan dated 05/01/25 revealed Resident #16 wandered up and down hallways and into other resident's rooms. Interventions included engaging the resident in activities, moving him into a less stimulating area and redirecting him as needed. Resident #16 also made sexually inappropriate advances towards staff members and mistook a female resident as his wife, becoming verbally and physically aggressive when redirected.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16, who was cognitively impaired and had a history of wandering and sexually inappropriate behaviors, received appropriate supervision to ensure the safety of Resident #49. This affected two residents (#16 and #49) of five reviewed for abuse and behavior monitoring. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 05/06/24. Diagnoses included dementia, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney disease, restlessness and agitation, and anxiety. Review of the care plan dated 05/01/25 revealed Resident #16 wandered up and down hallways and into other resident's rooms. Interventions included engaging the resident in activities, moving him into a less stimulating area and redirecting him as needed. Resident #16 also made sexually inappropriate advances towards staff members and mistook a female resident as his wife,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach of Resident #3, #27, #34 and #43. This affected four residents of 19 residents reviewed for accommodation of need. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 11/07/24 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, major depressive disorder, and insomnia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/13/25, revealed Resident #3 was moderately impaired cognitively, had upper and lower extremity impairment on one side, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living except required substantial/maximum assistance from staff for eating, required substantial/maximum assistance to roll left and right, was independent for maneuvering his motorized wheelchair, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and had two or more falls without major injury…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to refund resident funds within 30 days of discharge. This affected two residents (#253 and #254) of six residents (#2, #5, #15, #24, #253 and #254) reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of resident records for Resident #253 revealed an initial admission date of 09/12/14 and a discharge date of 11/15/24. Diagnosis included schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. A review of the face sheet for Resident #253 revealed they had a court appointed guardian. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #253 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the facility document titled Resident Fund Authorization revealed resident #253 authorized the facility to hold, safeguard and account for personal funds. The document was signed by Resident #253 on 09/08/15. On 05/28/25 at 11:00 A.M. a review of the resident fund account for Resident #253 revealed on 01/07/25 the facility distributed check #1901 in the amount of $5,588.60 to the guardian of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$24,850 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $24,850 — penalty dated 2025-05-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH