No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Piketon Nursing Center

300 Overlook Drive, Piketon, OH 45661 · For profit - Corporation · 46 certified beds · (740) 289-4074 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 289-4074 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited Dec 2021Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
549 S West St · (740) 289-2269 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
104 Thornton Dr · (740) 648-3020 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
577 S West St · (740) 443-6303 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.8%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms35.3%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.2%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.1%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.2%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.3%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.0%75.6%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.611.731.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.591.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.56U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
66.0%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 45.1 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-24)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, contract review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services to treat constipation, and hospice services. This affected three of three residents (Residents #15, #20, and #22) reviewed for constipation, one of one residents (Resident #15) reviewed for hospice services. Actual harm occurred to Resident #20 when the resident did not receive timely treatment for constipation that resulted in hospitalization of a bowel obstruction. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include: non displaced fracture of the right femur, cerebral palsy, paraplegia, contracture of left ankle, contracture of muscle multiple sites, post-surgical malabsorption, edema, anxiety disorder, disorder of psychological development, epilepsy, and constipation. Review of Resident #20's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 04/06/21 revealed Resident #20 had no speech, was rarely understood and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was appropriately assessed to identify the cause of the residents PTSD and minimize triggers and/or re-traumatization. This affected two residents (#7 and #18) out of two residents identified by the facility as having PTSD/trauma. The facility census was 43. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #7 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including partial intestinal obstruction, edema, ilius, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, Parkinson's disease, depression, anxiety, chronic post-traumatic stress disorder(on admission date of 04/07/23), schizoaffective disorder, and chronic kidney disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/11/25, revealed this resident was assessed to have intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15 out of 15. This resident was assessed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an order for the administration of as needed Ativan (an anti-anxiety medication) contained a stop date of 14 days or less. This affected one resident (#31) out of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Record review for Resident #31 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder, depression, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/27/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. The resident was assessed to have received anti-anxiety medications during the lookback period. Review of the active physicians order, dated 12/08/24, revealed Resident #31 was to be administered 0.5 milligrams (mg) of Ativan every two hours as needed for anxiety. The order did not contain a stop date. Review of the Medication Administration Records (MAR's) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a medication was administered according to physicians order. This affected one resident (#31) out of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Record review for Resident #31 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included chronic pain due to trauma, anxiety disorder, depression, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/27/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. Review of the active physicians order, dated 12/24/24, revealed Resident #31 was to be administered one milliliter (ml) of Morphine Sulfate (an opioid medication) Oral Suspension 20 milligrams (mg) per five ml's (which was equivalent to four mg's per dose administered) every two hours as needed for breakthrough pain. Review of the facility Controlled Drug Receipt…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-07 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure spend down notices were provided timely and appropriately. This affected four residents (#17, #24, #28, and #31) out of the five residents whose facility fund accounts were reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #17 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including cerebral palsy, disorder of muscle, and spastic quadraplegia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/17/23, revealed this resident was rarely/never understood. This resident was assessed to be dependent upon two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of the facility Funds Balance Report, dated 09/06/23, revealed the balance in Resident #17's account was $2,021.58. Review of the facility Spend Down Notice for Resident #17 revealed the notice was not dated and did not provide evidence of how or when it was sent to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews and facility policy, the facility failed to identify target behaviors with documentation and/or provide an appropriate diagnosis for psychotropic medications for five (Resident #2, #11, #28, #30 and #41) of the eight residents reviewed. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 10/25/22. Diagnoses included: anxiety disorder, unspecified intellectual disabilities, unspecified mental disorder due to known physiological condition and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident is rarely/never understood. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance with one-person physical assist with bed mobility, dressing, and toileting and extensive assistance with two person physical assist with transfers. Further review of the MDS revealed resident received antianxiety medication seven out of seven days. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen. This had the potential to affect 39 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Initial observation on 09/05/23 at 8:30 A.M. revealed the heating/air conditioning vents in the ceilings were rusty, with brown fuzzy like substance noted on the vents and around the vents on the ceiling. Observation on 08/07/23 at 10:30 A.M. revealed the heating/air conditioning vents in the ceiling remained soiled and blowed air over the food preparation and serving areas. The drain pipes under the sinks and dish tank were rusty, black and green like they leaked. The floor had black areas under the drains and the ice machine. Also the corners of the floor were dusty, dirty and black. The wall behind the steam/food holder was streaked with black and brown greasy like substance. The large plastic containers that contained flour and sugar were dusty on top with black like grime. Interview on 09/07/23 at 11:20 A.M. with the Regional Director (cook for the day)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility daily staffing sheets, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were maintained in an accurate manner and failed to ensure staff did not document the administration of medications using another staff members name and credentials. This affected the four residents (#2, #10, #28, and #295) reviewed for accurate documentation of medication and treatments. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #2 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including anxiety, depression, and delirium. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/06/23, revealed this resident was rarely/never understood. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility and toileting and to require extensive assistance from two staff members for transfers. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 08/2023 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-07 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements provided to residents included written notice of the residents right to rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing. This affected the ten residents (#7, #8, #18, #21, #26, #30, #31, #34, #37, and #41) who the facility identified as having signed arbitration agreements. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the facility provided list of residents who had signed arbitration agreements with the facility revealed there were ten residents ((#7, #8, #18, #21, #26, #30, #31, #34, #37, and #41) who had signed the agreements. Review of the facility Optional Arbitration Agreement form, revised 04/2017, revealed the agreement did not contain notice of the residents rights to rescind the arbitration agreement within 30 days of signing the agreement. Interview with the Administrator on 09/07/23 at 10:00 A.M. verified the facilities written arbitration agreement form did not contain notice of the residents right to rescind the arbitration agreement within 30 days of signing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and observation the facility failed to provide a safe comfortable environment for residents when the wall was scratched in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 20. The toilet seat was soiled in room [ROOM NUMBER], and there was cracked floor tiles in room [ROOM NUMBER]. This affected seven residents (#10, #11, #17, #20, #23, #37, and #95) living in those rooms. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Observation with the Maintenance Director #122 on 09/07/23 from 2:19 P.M. to 2:26 P.M. revealed room [ROOM NUMBER], where Resident #17 and #23 resides, had wall scratches and missing caulking around the toilet. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER], where Resident #95 resides, had wall scratches behind the resident's bed. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER], where Resident #20 and #37 resides, had a dark brown substance dried on the the raised toilet seat. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER], where Resident #10 and #11 resides, revealed a large crack in the floor covering multiple floor tiles. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) specified the type of skilled services being discontinued. This affected one resident (#33) out of the three residents reviewed for NOMNC and SNFABN notices during the annual survey. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Record review for Resident #33 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, glaucoma, and encephalopathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/21/23, revealed this resident was rarely/never understood. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of the NOMNC and SNFABN, both signed on 01/20/23, revealed the type of service listed as ending had been written in as Skilled Services and did not specify the type of skilled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to develop resident centered care plans for behavioral interventions for three (Residents #2, #28 and #30) of the eight residents reviewed. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 10/25/22. Diagnoses included: anxiety disorder, unspecified intellectual disabilities, unspecified mental disorder due to known physiological condition and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident is rarely/never understood. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance with one-person physical assist with bed mobility, dressing, and toileting and extensive assistance with two-persons physical assist with transfers. The resident received antianxiety medication seven days. Review of Resident #2's physician orders dated for 10/25/22 revealed this resident was receiving the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility interviews, record reviews and Medscape, the facility failed to obtain orders, and/or create care plans, conduct assessments and conduct communications for the appropriate care for three (Resident #25, #37, and # 295) out of twenty five residents reviewed. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident # 295, revealed an admission date of 08/24/23. Diagnoses included: acute osteomyelitis, essential hypertension, and type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. This resident was assessed to require limited assistance with one-person physical assist for bed mobility, transfer, dressing and supervision with set up only for eating. Review of the physician's order dated 08/25/23 for Resident #295 revealed an order for an Omnipod 5 G6 Intro (Gen 5) Kit (Insulin Infusion Disposable Pump) 1 unit every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medication error rates were not greater than five percent when Resident #95 did not receive their dose of Eliquis (an anticoagulant blood thinner medication) and gave Resident #37 the wrong dose amount of Vitamin D3. This affected two (Resident #37, and #95) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility had two errors out of 25 opportunities for a medication error rate of eight percent. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #95 revealed an admission date of 09/01/23 with pertinent diagnosis of: cellulitis, cirrhosis of liver, thrombocytopenia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, atrial fibrillation, type two diabetes mellitus, anemia, and congestive heart failure. Review of a Physicians Order dated 09/01/23 revealed to give apixaban (Eliquis) five milligrams one half tab by mouth every 12 hours. Observation on 09/06/23 at 7:54 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #138 administering medications to Resident #95 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to to provide a sanitary environment to prevent the spread and development of communicable disease and infections when they did not cleanse blood glucose monitoring machines appropriately after resident use for Resident #95. The facility identified three Residents (#5, #9, #11) on the 19-27 hallway who received blood glucose monitoring checks. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Record review of Resident #95 revealed an admission date of 09/01/23 with pertinent diagnosis of: cellulitis, cirrhosis of liver, thrombocytopenia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, atrial fibrillation, type two diabetes mellitus, anemia, and congestive heart failure. Review of a Physicians Order dated 09/03/23 revealed to inject novolog insulin per sliding scale before meals and at bedtime. Observation on 09/06/23 at 7:54 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #138 used the glucometer to check Resident #95 blood sugar level. RN #138 cleaned the glucometer with alcohol after she was done.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-12-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of time punch cards, and review of direct care staff schedule revealed the facility failed to ensure the facility had Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for a consecutive eight hours. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the nursing staff schedule from 11/01/21 through 11/30/21 revealed the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) were scheduled on 11/25/21 day shift. Review of the time punch cards for the DON revealed zero accumulated hours for 11/25/21. Review of the time punch for the ADON revealed zero accumulated hours for 11/25/21. Interview on 12/01/21 at 3:00 P.M. with the Administrator and the Regional Director of Clinical Operations #77 confirmed there was no RN coverage for the facility on 11/25/21.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-12-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, group resident interview, review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes, and a test tray the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at an acceptable temperature. This had the potential to affect 33 of 34 resident (Resident #15 receives nothing from the kitchen) and specifically affected Residents #26, #10, #22, #15, #18, #23, #26, #28, #29, and #31. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident Council meeting minutes revealed on 8/27/21 complaints of cold food, it was not the best food and the food was either over or under cooked. The 09/15/21 resident council minutes revealed the food was cold, the food tasted bad, the broccoli and cauliflower were overcooked, and served in big pieces. Interview of Resident #26 on 11/21/21 at 9:40 A.M. revealed sometimes the hot foods were served cold and were not good. Interview of Resident #10 on 11/21/21 10:30 A.M. revealed hot foods were served cold. Interview with Resident #22 on 11/21/21 at 10:53 A.M. revealed food was not served hot.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-12-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, resident group interview, resident council meeting minutes, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure accommodation of resident food preferences and failed to offer a food substitute when a resident did not like the food served. This affected 33 of 34 residents (except Resident #15 who received nothing from the kitchen) and specifically affected Residents #7, #18, #23, #28, #29, #30, and #31 . Findings include: Review of Resident Council meeting minutes revealed on 09/15/21 resident council minutes revealed staff never asked the resident's food preferences. The residents stated they never served what is on the menu, and the residents did not have a copy of the menu to ask for a substitution. Observation on 11/21/21 at 12:12 P. M. revealed Resident #18 did not eat her soup and State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #16 did not offer Resident #18 a substitute for the food she did not like. Resident #31 did not eat her chips, sandwich, or fruit and ate 50% of her soup. STNA #16 did not offer Resident #31 an alternate for the food items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen and ensure safe storage of foods served to residents. This had the potential to affect 33 of the 34 residents (Resident #15 does not receive nutrition from the facility kitchen) and specifically affected Residents #29 and #30. Facility census was 34. Findings include: The kitchen was observed on 11/21/21 at 8:20 A.M. with food debris noted on the bottom shelf of the reach in freezer. The hand washing station had missing cove base, missing and loose caulking seal around the sink and a wall gouge measuring eight inches by 10 inches long. At the time of the observation, Diet Manager, (DM )#11 verified the findings and verified the surfaces were unable to be cleaned and sanitized. Observation on 11/29/21 at 10:45 A.M. of the kitchen revealed the wall behind the stove had green drippings which had a greasy consistency when touched. Observation on 11/29/21 at 11:45 A.M. during preparation of puree foods by [NAME] #15, the attic entry door in the ceiling above the food preparation area had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review, and review of Centers for Disease Control information, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement transmission based precautions to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This had the potential to affect the 34 residents residing in the facility and specifically affected Resident #135. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Record review for Resident #135 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dysphagia, restlessness and agitation, and history of falls. This resident had no known allergies. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/22/21, revealed this resident had severely impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 04. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility and transfers and extensive assistance from one staff member for toileting. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-12-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the call light system in working order. This had the potential to affect the 34 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Observation on 11/29/21 at 12:43 P.M. revealed the call light system located at the nurses station was beeping and the light for room [ROOM NUMBER] was lit up but no lights outside resident rooms were lit up. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #88 responded to room [ROOM NUMBER] and found the call light system had not been activated in the room. LPN #88 then began going from room to room searching for the activated call light. Interview with LPN #88 on 11/29/21 at 12:50 P.M. verified the call light system located at the nurses station was beeping and the indicator for room [ROOM NUMBER] was lighting up indicating the resident residing in that room had activated the call light system. LPN #88 then verified no call lights outside the resident rooms had been lit up and the call light had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain tile flooring in a resident room in safe condition and to ensure residents and staff smoking area was free of fire hazards This had the potential to affect all 34 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 11/21/21 at 9:48 A.M. of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed there were five tiles located in the center of the room which were cracked and had raised corners coming off of the floor. Observation on 11/29/21 at 3:11 P.M. of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed there were five tiles located in the center of the room which were cracked and had raised corners coming off of the floor. Interview with Maintenance Supervisor #56 on 11/29/21 at 3:11 P.M. verified the five tiles located in the center of room [ROOM NUMBER] were cracked and had raised corners which needed to be replaced. 2. Observation on 11/30/21 between 4:15 P.M. and 4:22 P.M. State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #18 entered the dining room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Record review for Resident #26 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-displaced transverse fracture of right fibula, falls, muscle weakness, urinary tract infection, anxiety, morbid obesity, chronic pain, acute kidney failure, hypertension, bimalleolar fracture, and hyperlipidemia. This resident had no known drug allergies. Review of Resident #26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/19/21, revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of bilateral leg fractures and is currently in bed with a urinary catheter in place. Review of Resident #26's Physician Orders revealed an order was obtained on 11/03/21 for a urinary catheter due to recent acute kidney failure, resident request, and immobility. Order was obtained for 16 French urinary catheter with 10 ml balloon. Resident was explained risks and benefits.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Witnessed Authorization Forms were completed and available for residents whose personal funds were being managed by the facility. This affected two (Resident #4, and #5) of the four residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the resident personal funds account record for Resident #4 revealed the facility was managing a personal funds account for Resident #4, and failed to have a Witnessed Authorization Form on record for personal funds to be managed by the facility. Review of the resident personal funds account record for Resident #5 revealed the facility was managing a personal funds account for Resident #5, and failed to have a Witnessed Authorization Form on record for personal funds to be managed by the facility. Interview on 11/29/21 at 11:30 A.M. with Business Office Manager #76 confirmed Resident #4, and #5 did not have a Witnessed Authorization Form on record.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide receipts and/or book keeping records for all personal account activity. This affected three (Resident #4, #5, and #11) of the (4) four residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the resident personal funds revealed the facility failed to keep or provide records and/or receipts for purchases or withdrawals from resident personal funds accounts for Resident #4, #5, and #11 who were noted to have personal funds being managed by the facility. Interview on 11/29/21 at 11:30 A.M. with Business Office Manager #76 confirmed she was not able to locate any receipts for any purchases or cash withdrawals for Resident #4, #5, and #11.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, group resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide an adequate dining space that was clean, comfortable, and homelike. This affected 11 residents who routinely ate in the common area by the nurses station (Resident #6, Resident #8, Resident #18, Resident #23, Resident #31, Resident #24, Resident #29, Resident #13, Resident #7, Resident #3, and Resident #26) and one resident ( Resident #12) who was observed eating in the common area. The facility census was 34 residents. Findings include: Observation on 11/21/21 at 8:15 A.M. revealed a large dining room with the doors closed. The room was brightly lit, had seven tables of differing sizes, and other dining room furnishings (sideboards, china cabinets, etc.). At the time of the observation, Dietary Manager (DM) #11 confirmed it was the resident dining room, but it was closed to the residents and she did not know why. DM #11 revealed the residents had not used the dining room since June 2021. Observation on 11/21/21 at 11:49 A.M. revealed residents eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet for three residents, (Residents #6, #12 and #30,) and accurately monitor weights for one resident (Resident #24), as ordered by the physician for 21 residents reviewed for nutritional status. The facility census was 34. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record and face sheet revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (COPD), dementia, SOB, gastritis, peripheral vascular disease, depressive disorder, nausea, reflux disease, fatigue, and muscle weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was moderately cognitively impaired, received a mechanically altered diet, was edentulous without pain., and had no depression. Review of plan of care updated on 09/15/21, addressed Resident #30's nutritional risk due to dementia, COPD, and edentulous assessment. Interventions included provide food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: seizures, dementia, diabetes, hypertension, schizoaffective disorder (10/26/2021). Review of Resident #24's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #24 used oxygen and on hospice. Review of Resident #24's monthly physician orders for November 2021 revealed oxygen at two liters per minute as needed for dyspnea and to change the oxygen tubing every week and as needed. Review of Resident #24's treatment administration record for November 2021 revealed oxygen ordered at two liters for per minute and to change the tubing every week. There was no evidence Resident #24's oxygen tubing was changed. Observation on 11/21/21 at 9:48 A.M. of Resident #24's room revealed an oxygen concentrator with tubing next to Resident #24's bed. The tubing attached to the concentrator was not dated. Observation of Resident #24's oxygen concentrator on 11/29/21 at 10:00 A.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and personnel file review, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff were provided dementia education. This affected one resident (Resident #24) of 11 residents with a dementia diagnosis. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of Resident # 24's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: seizures, dementia, diabetes, hypertension, schizoaffective disorder. Review of Resident #24's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #24 had short-term and long-term memory problems, no recall and her decision making was severely impaired. Resident #24 had no behaviors, she rejected care one to three days. Resident #24 was dependent on two staff for bed mobility, required extensive assistance of two staff to transfer, did not walk, no locomotion, required extensive assistance of two staff for dressing, was dependent on one staff to eat, for toilet use, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to provide personal materials of the resident's choice as requested. This affected one resident(Resident #28) out of two residents reviewed for personal choices. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Record review for Resident #28 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitis type II, myositis, muscle weakness, hypertension, anxiety, osteoarthritis, urinary tract infection, dyspnea, depression, cardiac arrhythmias, bipolar disorder, muscle spasms, pain, constipation, Vitamin D deficiency, hyperlipidemia, thyroid disorders, hyperlipidemia, depression, atherosclerotic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pain syndrome, and cystocele. This resident had allergies to Ibuprofen. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/03/21, revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents who formulated an advance directive had the directive honored. This affected two of five sampled residents (Resident #15 and Resident #24) reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, urinary incontinence, anxiety, hemiplegia and hemiparesis of right side, and psychosis. Resident #15 requested a do not resuscitate-comfort care (DNR-CC) order on 09/26/19. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #15's speech was clear, she was understood by others, understands others, her vision was adequate with no correction, and her cognition was intact. Resident #15 had a life expectancy of six months or less and she received hospice services. Review of Resident #15's signed October 2021 and November 2021…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident being discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining was provided a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) form, and a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage-Forms, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 10123-(NOMNC) form. This affected one resident of the three residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notifications (Resident #13). The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 09/24/20. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure, and drug induced acute dystonia (involuntary muscle contractions that cause repetitive or twisting movements). Review of Resident #13's Significant Change of Condition, Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 experienced long and short term memory problems and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and observation the facility failed to assess a resident's use of a specialty chair and failed to assure the resident's chair was not positioned to prevent the resident for getting out of the chair. This affected one of one residents (Resident #24) reviewed for restraints. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: seizures, dementia, diabetes, and hypertension. Review of Resident #24's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #24's speech was clear, Resident #24 was rarely understood, rarely understands, she had short-term and long-term memory problems, no recall and her decision making was severely impaired. Resident #24 had no behaviors, she rejected care one to three days. Resident #24 was dependent on two staff for bed mobility, required extensive assistance of two staff to transfer, did not walk, and had no locomotion. Resident #24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Review of resident medical record and staff interview, the facility failed to document a discharge for a resident returning to the community. This affected one (Resident #34) of the two residents reviewed for discharging from the facility. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date on 02/24/21 and a discharge date of 08/31/21. Diagnoses included, dementia without behavioral disturbances, hypertension, and muscle weakness. Review of the Resident #34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07 indicating a severely impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #34 required limited assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, ambulation, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene, and supervision with set up help only for eating. Review of Resident #34's MDS revealed Discharge, return not anticipated, dated 08/31/21. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate dental and nutritional assessments to appropriately represent the residents health status. This affected two residents (Resident #4 and Resident #20) of 21 residents reviewed for accurate assessments. The facility census was 34. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #4 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Huntington's disease, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, dementia, dysphagia, abnormal posture, peripheral vascular disease, delusional disorders, depression, unspecified psychosis, paranoid personality disorder, Vitamin D deficiency, and shortness of breath. This resident had no known allergies. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/17/21, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 8. Review of Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to refer a resident for a level II pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) when the resident was newly diagnosed with a mental illness. This affected one of three sampled residents (Resident #24) reviewed for PASRR. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: seizures, dementia, diabetes, hypertension, schizoaffective disorder (10/26/21). Review of Resident #24's PASRR dated 03/17/21 revealed Resident #24 did not have any mental illness. Review of Resident #24's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident # 24 did not have a level II PASRR completed. There was no level II PASRR conducted after Resident #24 was newly diagnosed with a mental illness, schizoaffective disorder. Interview of Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO) #77 on 11/30/21 at 11:16 A.M. confirmed no level II PASRR was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority promptly after an significant change in a resident mental health, a resident with a newly diagnosed mental illness. This affected one of three sampled residents (Resident #24) reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR). Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: seizures, dementia, diabetes, hypertension, schizoaffective disorder (10/26/21). Resident #24 received a new mental health diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder on 10/26/21. Resident #24 had no mental illness diagnoses identified prior. Interview of Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO) #77 on 11/30/21 at 11:16 A.M. confirmed the state mental health authority was not notified of Resident #24's significant change in mental health.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Review of resident medical record and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for a resident returning to the community. This affected one (Resident #34) of the two residents reviewed for discharge from the facility. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date on 02/24/21 and a discharge date of 08/31/21. Diagnoses included, dementia without behavioral disturbances, hypertension, and muscle weakness. Review of the Resident #34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07 indicating a severely impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #34 required limited assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, ambulation, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene, and supervision with set up help only for eating. Review of Resident #34's MDS revealed Discharge, return not anticipated, dated 08/31/21. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with the necessary assistance to help maintain abilities in the area of eating and ambulation. This affected four of 22 residents (#7, #8, #12, and #24) reviewed for meal assistance. The facility census was 34. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #12 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, tremors, anxiety, depression, hypothyroidism, and malignant neoplasm of the breast. This resident had no known allergies. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/05/21, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 06. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and set-up assistance with supervision for eating. This resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance and care for one dependent resident (Residents #11) of 21 residents reviewed for ADL assistance. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record and face sheet revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, difficulty walking, hemiplegia following cerebral vascular accident, dysphagia, peripheral vascular disease, and aphasia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 was cognitively intact and was able to make needs known. Resident #11 required extensive assistance of one person assistance for personal hygiene care, including shaving and supervision for bathing. Review of the plan of care, revised on 10/07/21, identified Resident #11's need for extensive assistance of one staff with grooming. Interventions included explaining procedures prior to starting and providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident group meeting, and resident council minute review the facility failed to provide residents with a meaningful, varied activity program, and ongoing activities program that was tailored to the wants and needs of the residents living in the facility. This affected three of three sampled residents (Resident #6, Resident #20, and Resident #24) and five of five residents (Resident #18, Resident #31, Resident #23, Resident #28, and Resident #29) who attended the resident group meeting. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include: non displaced fracture of the right femur, cerebral palsy, paraplegia, contracture of left ankle, contracture of muscle multiple sites, postsurgical malabsorption, edema, anxiety disorder, disorder of psychological development, epilepsy, and constipation. Review of Resident #20's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to assess and provide vision services and devices as needed. This affected one of one residents reviewed for vision (Resident #15). Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, urinary incontinence, anxiety, hemiplegia and hemiparesis right side, and psychosis. Review of Resident #15's annual minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #15's speech was clear, she understood others, her vision was adequate with no correction, and her cognition was intact. Resident #15 had no behaviors and did not reject care. Resident #15 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and to transfer. Review of Resident # 15's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the following changes: rejected care one to three days, and for locomotion she required set up help with staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to complete fall investigations and assessments of residents after falls with head injuries. This affected one of three residents reviewed for falls and after fall assessments (Resident #384). Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #384 revealed an initial admission date of 10/09/13, re-entry date on 11/01/13, and a discharge date on 05/19/21. Diagnoses included difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet, repeated falls, muscle weakness, abnormal posture, stiffness of the knees, transient ischemic attack (TIA), concussion without loss of consciousness, injury of the head, and contusion of the scalp. Review of Resident #384's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating a moderately impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #384 was noted to experience or express no behaviors. Resident #384 required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to assess and provide treatment and care to treat a resident's incontinence. This affected one of one residents reviewed for bladder function (Resident #15). Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, urinary incontinence, anxiety, hemiplegia and hemiparesis right side, and psychosis. Review of Resident #15 annual minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #15's speech was clear, she understood others, and her cognition was intact. Resident #15 had no behaviors and did not reject care. Resident #15 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and to transfer. Resident #15 was not on a toileting program and was always incontinent of bladder, There was no comprehensive assessment of Resident #15's bladder function or bladder retraining potential.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy recommendations, and staff interview the facility failed to review a resident's drug regimen and make recommendations regarding drug irregularities. This affected one of six sampled residents (Resident #24) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: seizures, dementia, diabetes, and hypertension. On 10/26/21 a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was added. Review of Resident #24's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #24 received an antipsychotic medication, an antidepressant medication, and an anticoagulant, 6 of 7 day assessment period and there was no dose reduction of the antipsychotic medication. Review of Resident #24's monthly physician orders revealed on admission an order for an antipsychotic medication (Risperdal) one milligram (mg) at bedtime. Review of Resident #24's July 2021,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive an antipsychotic medication without an indication for its use. This affected one of six sampled residents (Resident #24) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: seizures, dementia, diabetes, and hypertension. On 10/26/21 a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was added. Review of Resident #24's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #24 received an antipsychotic medication, an antidepressant medication, and an anticoagulant 6 of 7 day assessment period. There was no dose reduction of the antipsychotic medication. Review of Resident #24's monthly physician orders revealed on admission an order for an antipsychotic medication (Risperdal) one milligram (mg) at bedtime. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed the resident did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide routine dental services for two residents. This affected two residents (Resident #4 and Resident #15) of four residents reviewed for routine dental services. The facility census was 34. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #4 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Huntington's disease, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, dementia, dysphagia, abnormal posture, peripheral vascular disease, delusional disorders, depression, unspecified psychosis, paranoid personality disorder, Vitamin D deficiency, and shortness of breath. This resident had no known allergies. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/17/21, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 8. Review of Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment Section L 0200 completed on 05/07/21 revealed the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records reflected an accurate code status and enteral nutrition orders. This affected two residents (Resident #383, and #20) of the 23 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 34. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #383 revealed an admission date of [DATE], and a discharge date of [DATE]. Diagnoses include chronic kidney disease stage 3, hypokalemia, and heart disease. Review of Resident #383's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision abilities. Resident #383 required supervision with no set up for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #383 required supervision with set up assist for eating and toilet use. Review of Resident #383's physician orders for [DATE] revealed Resident #383's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SERENITY EQUITY HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 09/18/2017
ZW AOM RE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 09/18/2017
GOLDSTEIN, JEFFERYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER21%since 01/15/2024
SHERMAN, ALEXANDERIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER17%since 01/15/2024
HOROWITZ, ZALEMANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 09/18/2017
WAGSCHAL, ZALMANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 09/18/2017
WEINBERGER, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 09/18/2017
MASSIE, ROBERTIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/18/2017
SHERMAN, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/18/2017
AOM HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/18/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$226K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 3%Other / private 25%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $226K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$253per resident / day
operating cost
$7,694per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$273per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365961. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next