Geneva Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 68.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.550 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to provide comprehensive, individualized and necessary pressure ulcer assessment and care for Resident #56. This affected one resident (#56) of two residents reviewed for pressure related wound care. The facility census was 63. Actual harm occurred on 03/26/24 when the facility failed to adequately assess and implement pressure ulcer wound care for Resident #56, a new admission who had impaired cognition and bowel incontinence. On 03/28/24 the resident was transferred to the emergency room where hospital staff identified an extensive coccyx/sacral pressure ulcer with surrounding cellulitis and additional concern for osteomyelitis. The facility had not implemented any type of pressure ulcer wound care for the resident prior to the hospitalization. The resident was admitted for wound care intervention with intravenous antibiotic treatment due to the facility's lack of monitoring and adequate wound care following initial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to serve hot and palatable foods. This affected four residents (Residents #2, #6, #8 and #61) and had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 68.Findings include: Interview with Resident #2 on 04/13/26 at 10:41 A.M. revealed the facility's food was The worst food I ever ate in the world. It's cooked until it's leather and dry. Interview with Resident #8 on 04/13/26 at 11:06 A.M. revealed the facility's food was scrambled eggs terrible, tasteless, and not real hot.Interview with Resident #61 on 04/13/26 at 11:11 A.M. revealed the facility's food was not hot, tasteless sometimes, and the meat is hard.Interview with Resident #6 on 04/13/26 at 12:49 P.M. revealed the facility's food was okay sometimes, most of the time it's cold by the time it gets to me. Observation of the test tray with Dietary Manager (DM) #236 on 04/15/26 at 1:09 P.M. revealed the tray consisted of chicken pot pie filling, cauliflower, a biscuit, and a brownie. The pot pie filling was 105 degrees Fahrenheit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and review of email correspondence, water temperature audit forms and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain adequate hot water temperatures in resident rooms. This affected four residents (Residents #9, #14, #17 and #54) out of 12 residents reviewed for hot water temperatures. The facility census was 68.Findings include:Interview on 04/13/26 at 4:10 P.M. with Resident #9 complained of his hot water not being warm enough when taking a shower and it was uncomfortable. Observation at the time of the interview revealed the hot water temperature in Resident #9's sink was 88 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The Administrator and Director of Maintenance (DM) #248 were notified of the temperature result at the time of the observation. An interview with DM #248 revealed he had increased the hot water tank temperature level.Observation on 04/14/26 at 7:35 A.M. of Resident #9's hot water temperature resulted in a reading of 92 degrees F. The Administrator was notified of the temperature result at the time of the observation.Review of email correspondence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #63's comprehensive care plan was revised regarding her desire to live in the community and failed to assist Resident #63 with her discharge planning. This affected one resident (#63) out of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 12/31/24 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS), diabetes, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder and major depression. Review of the care plan dated 12/31/24 revealed Resident #63's discharge planning was long-term placement. The care plan revealed Resident #63 stated she would stay at the facility, for now. Interventions included allowing resident choices, assessing resident's understanding and ability in safety during transfers, mobility, and activities of daily living, and offering opportunity to verbalize…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-03 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure state-tested nursing aides (STNAs) received annual performance evaluations. This affected two STNAs (#604 and #614) of three reviewed for completed employee files. This had the potential to affect all 63 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Record review of the employee files for STNA #604 revealed she was hired 12/21/22. Record review of the employee file for STNA #614 revealed she was hired 12/22/22. No documented evidence could be found in either employee file indicating they received annual performance evaluations. Interview with Human Resources Director #663 on 05/29/24 at 4:05 P.M. confirmed the above findings. She said the facility did not perform annual evaluations for their employees.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and the dish machine was monitored to ensure all service ware, cutlery, and utensils were sanitized effectively. This had the potential to affect 63 residents residing in the facility. The facility identified no residents received nothing by mouth. Findings include: An initial kitchen tour was conducted on 05/28/24 between 8:59 A.M. and 9:22 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #655. Observation of the low temperature dish machine revealed the following: • Dietary Worker/Cook #661 did not know what the temperature of dish machine should be or how to test the chemical level. DM #665 tested the dish machine rinse with a test strip usually used for testing Quaternary solutions used in the three compartment sinks and sanitizing buckets. Quaternary solutions should be maintained at 150 to 200 parts per million (ppm) concentration. The test strip did not show any results because it was the wrong type of strip. • Low temperature dish washers use chemical sanitization.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the memorandum from the Department of Health and Human Services, the facility failed to initiate and use enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when appropriate for Residents #56, #262, #264, and #313. This affected four residents (#56, #262, #264 and #313) of seven residents reviewed for infection prevention and control and had the potential to affect all 63 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 05/28/24 at 9:08 A.M. with Resident #262 revealed a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) in the right arm. There was no EBP posted and no personal protective equipment (PPE) available at the room entrance. Review of the medical record for Resident #262 revealed an admission date of 04/23/24. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis, diabetes mellitus type II, and urinary tract infection. The physician orders and medication administration records from April 2024 to May 2024 indicated an intravenous (IV) antibiotic was infused daily via PICC from admission until…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans and/or Kardex's were complete for Residents #14, #16, #50, and #52. This affected four residents (#14, #16, #50, and #52) out of 22 resident's care plans reviewed. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 08/04/21 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the care plan dated 08/11/21 revealed Resident #16 was on diuretic therapy due to edema. Interventions included administering diuretic medications as ordered, monitor, document and report any adverse effects, and apply TED hose/embolic stockings (tight stockings applied to lower extremities to reduce edema (swelling caused by fluid trapped in body's tissues) to her bilateral lower extremities as tolerated by donning in the morning and doffing at night. The comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to puree all items in a manner that preserved nutrient value and taste. This had the potential to affect the five residents (#13, #18, #31, #46, and #213) identified by the facility as receiving pureed consistency foods. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Observation on 05/29/24 at 11:41 A.M. of the preparation of puree green beans revealed [NAME] #656 added green beans and their cooking water to a blender. There was a lot of cooking water. The green bean mixture was blended. [NAME] #656 checked the consistency and found it was too thin. The cook added food thicker and blended again. This was completed three times. The resulting puree green beans had an appropriate consistency but tasted diluted. This amount of water and thickener also diluted the nutrient density. [NAME] #656 verified there had been too much water in the mixture requiring additional thickener to be needed to reach the correct consistency.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide privacy for urinary catheter drainage bags. This affected three residents (#25, #56 and #264) of four residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/28/24 at 9:29 A.M. from the hallway outside Resident #25's room revealed Resident #25 lying in bed with a urinary catheter drainage bag secured to the right bedside facing the room entrance door. There was no privacy covering over the urinary drainage bag. Interview on 05/29/24 at 9:31 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #630 verified there was no privacy covering over Resident #25's urinary catheter drainage bag or it was not placed on the opposite side of the bed out of public view. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 11/20/23. Diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, urinary tract infection, multiple sclerosis, and diabetes mellitus type II. The plan of care dated 11/20/23 indicated Resident #25 had a suprapubic catheter for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 and Resident #60's embolic stockings (tight stockings applied to lower extremities to reduce edema) were applied as ordered by the physician. This affected two residents (#16 and #50) out of two residents reviewed for edema. This had the potential to affect five additional residents (#3, #4, #7, #38, and #42) identified by the facility as residents who had orders for embolic stockings. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 08/04/21 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the care plan dated 08/11/21 revealed Resident #16 was on diuretic therapy due to edema. Interventions included administering diuretic medications as ordered, monitor, document, and report any adverse effects, and apply TED hose (embolic stockings) to her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-29 for 13 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH