No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Addison Heights Health And Rehabilitation Center

3600 Butz Rd, Maumee, OH 43537 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (419) 867-7926 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (419) 867-7926 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0603) — most recent Dec 2025Resident-funds citation (F0567)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Dec 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (79) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1657 Holland Rd Ste A · (419) 794-2180 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4060 Technology Dr · (800) 257-2970 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3320 Briarfield Blvd · (419) 794-4000 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3410 Briarfield Blvd · (419) 867-9119 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3000 Strayer Rd · (419) 866-2094

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.7%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms73.4%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.5%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.8%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.5%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.5%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.9%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.0%75.6%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.82
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
69.5%
Total nursing turnover
83.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 74.2 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-15)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

79 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 68 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, family interview, staff interview, review of x-ray reports, and review of hospital documents, the facility failed to provide follow up assessments and failed to ensure potential abnormal x-ray results were reported to the facility and physician. This resulted in actual harm based on a reasonable person ' s response of experiencing pain due to the presence of a fracture that was not immobilized, when Resident #50, who had severe cognitive impairment and impairment in her ability to communicate, was identified with a swollen left wrist and pain in the hand. An x-ray was ordered to the hand with no x-ray ordered to the wrist. The hand x-ray captured an image of the wrist, which appeared abnormal. The x-ray services did not identify the need for any follow up to the wrist and the nursing staff failed to provide any follow up assessments of the swollen wrist and painful hand. Sixteen days later the resident continued to complain of pain to the wrist with swelling, with an x-ray identifying the resident to have left wrist fractures. This affected one (#50)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the facility maintained comfortable and safe temperature levels. This affected all residents with the exception of 15 (#10, #12, #14, #15, #22, #26, #28, #35, #37, #43, #45, #48, #49, #50, and #51) residents whose room and common area were maintained at an appropriate temperature. The facility census was 74.Findings include: Observation on 07/01/26 at 3:50 P.M. revealed residents in the front lobby wearing weather appropriate clothing with white wash clothes around their neck or on top of their head. Observation on 07/01/26 beginning at 4:17 P.M. revealed the following resident common areas tempted above 82.0 degrees Fahrenheit: 100 hall way (82.7 degrees Fahrenheit), locked memory care unit dining room (88 degrees Fahrenheit), and 400 hall (90 degrees Fahrenheit). The following resident rooms tempted above 82.0 degrees Fahrenheit: Resident #21 and #42 room (82.1 degrees Fahrenheit), Resident #18 and #38 room (84.8 degrees Fahrenheit), Resident #31 and #39 (90.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, pest control vendor interview, review of pest control invoices, review of a staff statement and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This affected one (#48) of three residents reviewed for pest control with the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility census was 72.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 12/18/15. Diagnoses included celiac disease (digestive disorder), diabetes mellitus Type Two, pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation (A-fib), congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic pain, depression, and psychosis.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for toileting and bed mobility and required moderate assistance for personal hygiene. Further review of the MDS for Resident #48 revealed she had unhealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, hospice staff interview, pest control vendor interview, medical record review, review of hospice documentation, review of a staff written statement and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a dignified existence for a hospice resident when the resident was found with ants ants crawling all over her body. This affected one (#48) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 72. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 12/18/15. Diagnoses included celiac disease (digestive disorder), diabetes mellitus Type Two, pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation (A-fib), congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic pain, depression, and psychosis.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for toileting and bed mobility and required moderate assistance for personal hygiene. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there were effective procedures in place to protect the residents' personal belongings. This affected five (#80, #2, #11, #37, and #55) of seven residents reviewed for personal property and missing items. This had the potential to affect all residents except four residents (#6, #52, #64, #75) not receiving facility laundry services. The facility census was 74. Findings include:1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 10/06/26 and a discharge date of 12/31/26. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, type two diabetes mellitus, depressive disorder, anxiety, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Review of Resident #80's inventory of personal effects form dated 10/06/25 and signed by the resident's representative and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident representative was notified of change in condition. This affected one (#79) of three residents reviewed for changes in condition. The facility census was 74. Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 06/27/25 and a discharge date of 02/08/26. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, and depressive disorder.Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of a physician order dated 01/22/26 at 10:30 A.M. revealed an order for a STAT left arm x-ray, two views of whole arm, humerus, forearm, and hand for edema.Review of a physician order dated 01/22/26 and 10:30 A.M. revealed to apply ice to the left arm and hand, on 20 minutes and off 20 minutes every two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation was timely reported to the state agency. This affected one (#68) of four residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. The facility census was 74. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 10/22/25. Diagnoses included malignant carcinoid tumor of the bronchus and lung, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of the liver, depressive disorder, neoplasm of the brain, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition.Review of a nurse's note dated 02/14/26 at 11:00 A.M. revealed the resident was in his room going through his belongings. The hospice nurse had arrived to evaluate the resident. The resident was in the hallway with some of his belongings on his rollator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barriers precautions were implemented per physician orders. This affected one (#18) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility identified 14 residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs). The facility census was 74. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 02/17/23. Diagnoses included paraplegia, hypertension, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and stage four pressure ulcers to the right and left hips.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had intact cognition. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter, an ostomy, and two stage four pressure ulcers present on admission. Review of the physician orders dated 08/05/25 revealed the resident had orders for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Staff were to use gowns and gloves for high-contact resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate system for the dispensing, administration, reconciliation and destruction of controlled substances. The facility identified 34 residents receiving controlled pain medications. The facility census was 73. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #161 revealed an admission date of 10/22/25. Diagnoses included malignant carcinoid tumor of the bronchus and lung, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of the liver, and low back pain. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was independent for all activities of daily living. The resident had frequent pain.Review of physician orders dated 12/29/25 revealed an order for Oxycodone 30 milligrams (mg), one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain, discontinue when new medication arrives for 20 mg.Review of the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were implemented regarding the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during a SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) outbreak. This had the potential to affect 54 residents not diagnosed with COVID-19 during the outbreak. The facility identified 14 residents with a COVID-19 infection (#17, #20, #34, #36, #37, #39, #41, #43, #46, #50, #56, #62, #67, and #73). The facility census was 68. Findings Include:Observation on 12/01/25 at 1:10 P.M., upon entrance to the facility, revealed staff and residents were wearing surgical masks.Interview on 12/01/25 at approximately 1:11 P.M. with Medical Records (MR) #362 revealed the facility was in a COVID-19 outbreak. Observations on 12/01/25 between 1:48 P.M. and 2:59 P.M. revealed personal protective equipment (PPE) carts and signs for droplet precautions were posted appropriately throughout the facility.Observation on 12/01/25 at 2:49 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were in place to assist with bed mobility. This affected one (#58) resident of three reviewed for bed rail use. The facility census was 68. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 05/02/25 with diagnoses of morbid obesity, muscle weakness, and Type II Diabetes Mellitus.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/08/25, revealed Resident #58 had intact cognition and was able to roll to the left and right with supervision and/or touching assistance.Review of the current care plan, initiated 05/02/25 and updated 06/24/25 revealed Resident #58 had impaired functional abilities, self-care and mobility deficits. Interventions included bilateral half side rails to promote independence with bed mobility, self-positioning and transfers.Review of the Side Rail/Grab Bar Review assessments, completed 05/02/25 and 11/06/25 revealed bilateral side rails/grab bars were indicated and served as an enabler to promote…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 68 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the facility's investigation, review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #267064, staff interview, police report review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision which resulted in an incident of sexual abuse. This affected one (#36) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 68.1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 06/27/25 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, cerebral infarction, depression, anxiety, and cerebrovascular disease.Review of the comprehensive, significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/10/25, revealed Resident #36 had severely impaired cognition, used a wheelchair for mobility and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily life.Review of a nursing progress note dated 11/01/25 at 10:57 P.M., and written by the Director of Nursing, revealed Resident #36 was in her wheelchair in the lounge and another resident (Resident #73) had his hand in her brief. The residents were immediately separated and placed on 15-minute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, review of Self-Reported Incident #267064, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported timely to the State Agency. This affected one (Resident #36) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 68.Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 06/27/25 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, cerebral infarction, depression, anxiety, and cerebrovascular disease.Review of the comprehensive, significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/10/25, revealed Resident #36 had severely impaired cognition, used a wheelchair for mobility and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily life.Review of a nursing progress note dated 11/01/25 at 10:57 P.M., and written by the Director of Nursing, revealed Resident #36 was in her wheelchair in the lounge and another resident (Resident #73) had his hand in her brief. The residents were immediately separated and placed on 15-minute checks.Review of the facility's Self-Reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given per physician order. This affected two (#85 and #55) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 68. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Former Resident, Resident #85 revealed an admission date of 10/10/25. Resident #85 discharged home on [DATE]. Diagnoses included a fractured neck of right femur, osteoarthritis, anxiety, schizoaffective disorder, and venous thrombosis. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/17/25, revealed Resident #85 had impaired cognition.Review of the physician orders initiated 10/10/25 revealed Resident #85 should have received Senna (laxative) oral tablet, 8.6 milligrams (mg), two tablets by mouth once daily for constipation, Cefuroxime Axetil (an antibiotic) oral tablet 500 mg, one tablet twice daily for infection for five days; Eliquis (anticoagulant) oral tablet 5 mg, one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled with open dates and failed to ensure staff were knowledgeable regarding identifying expiration dates of packaged foods. This affected one (#16) resident identified to be on thickened liquids. The facility census was 68.Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 03/01/21 with diagnoses of hemiplegia/hemiparesis, cerebral infarction, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/23/25, revealed Resident #16 had impaired cognition. Review of a physician order dated 11/19/25 and discontinued 12/02/25 revealed Resident #16 was on nectar thick liquids.Review of a current physician order dated 12/02/25 revealed Resident #16 was on nectar thickened liquids.Observations of food storage on 12/01/25 beginning at 3:20 P.M. and concurrent interview with Dietary Manager (DM) #395, revealed a reach-in cooler with four 46-ounce cartons of nectar thickened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure mattresses and bedframes were compatible. This affected one (#58) of three residents reviewed for mattress and bed frame compatibility. The facility census was 68. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 05/02/25 with diagnoses of morbid obesity, muscle weakness, and Type II Diabetes Mellitus.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/08/25, revealed Resident #58 had intact cognition and was able to roll to the left and right with supervision and/or touching assistance.Review of the current physician order dated 05/07/25 revealed Resident #58 required a low air loss mattress at all times. Observation and interview on 12/01/25 at 1:50 P.M. with Resident #58 revealed a grab bar was on the left side of his bed, but no grab bar was on the right side of his bed. Resident #58 stated the mattress was too big for the frame. Observation and interview on 12/01/25 at 1:56 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #351 confirmed Resident #58's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Self-Reported Incidents, review of witness statements, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of staff to resident abuse to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#27) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 63. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included sepsis, other seizures, bipolar disorder, dysphagia-oropharyngeal phase, epilepsy, muscle weakness, other disorders of psychological development, and major depressive disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #27 was rarely or never understood by staff. Review of the plan of care dated 08/07/25 revealed Resident #27 was at risk for falls related to confusion, and unawareness of safety needs. Interventions included providing the resident with activities that were appropriate for the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, and review of facility staffing documentation, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was scheduled eight consecutive hours when the facility exceeded a census of 60 residents. This affected all 60 residents residing in the facility. Review of facility staffing documentation and related schedules between 09/01/25 and 09/07/25. Facility census was 61 current residents on 09/04/25, 09/05/25, 09/06/25. The facility Director of Nursing was listed as the only Registered Nurse in the facility. On 09/11/25 at 1:07 P.M. interview with Scheduling Coordinator (SC) #466 during a review of facility schedules between 09/01/25 and 09/07/25 verified no additional Registered Nurse was scheduled in the facility on 09/04/25, 09/05/25, 09/06/25. SC #466 also confirmed the facility exceeded a resident census of 60 on each of the three days. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2608577.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of manufactures guidelines, review of pharmacy policy, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store medications that require refrigeration. This affected Resident #13. The facility failed to ensure the freezer, located inside of the medication-storage refrigerator, was properly maintained. This affected eight residents (#10, #13, #33, #34, #37, #42, #60, and #68) that were identified by the facility as utilizing medications that required refrigeration. The facility also failed to ensure the medication-storage refrigerator maintained the correct temperature parameters to safely store medications that require refrigeration. This affected eight residents (#10, #13, #33, #34, #37, #42, #60, and #68) that were identified by the facility as utilizing medications that required refrigeration. The facility also failed to ensure that multi-use vials of medication were labeled properly when opened. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interviews, and schedule reviews the facility failed to ensure adequate kitchen staff were available to provide timely meal service. This affected all residents. The facility census was 60.Observation of the kitchen staff on 09/08/25 at 8:00 A.M. revealed only Dietary Manager #504 was working in the kitchen and was preparing the breakfast meal.Review of the dietary staffing schedule dated 09/08/25 revealed one cook was scheduled from 6:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M., and a dietary aide from 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. and a second aide from 10:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. There were two open shifts from 4:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 A.M.Interview with Dietary Manager #504 on 09/08/25 at 8:00 A.M. revealed two additional staff were scheduled, but failed to come into work.Observation at 12:45 P.M. revealed Resident #26 was in the main lobby asking staff where lunch was because she was hungry.Observation on 09/08/25 revealed lunch service was not provided until 1:00 P.M. to 1:42 P.M. Interview with Residents #22, #26, and #30 revealed lunch was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to dispose of expired foods and store foods properly. This had the ability to affect all residents. The facility census was 60.Kitchen observation on 09/08/25 at 7:57 A.M. revealed several foods were found expired in the walk in refrigerator. A plastic container of pears was dated 08/30/25 and marked to be used by 09/03/25. A large plastic container of jelly was dated 08/04/25 and use by date was 09/04/25. A plastic container was dated 09/07/25 and use by date was 09/07/25. Further observation revealed two five pound rolls of ground beef were sitting on a tray and had a red liquid substance on the tray. The meat failed to be labeled with dates.Observation of the walk-in freezer on 09/08/25 at 8:05 A.M. revealed a plastic bag of frozen chicken patties were left open to air. Observation of the dry storage area on 09/08/25 at 8:08 A.M. revealed a plastic bin sitting on the floor with bread crumbs inside. The lid failed to be attached properly and was allowing the crumbs to be open to air.Interview with Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement and monitor an effective water management program to minimize the risk for Legionella growth in the facilities building. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 60. Review of the facilities policy titled Legionella Infection Control Protocol, undated, revealed the facility will flush toilets and run sinks in resident's rooms daily to flush any standing water. The facilities protocol does not address flushing water in any other areas or a way to track and monitor areas that have been flushed. Interview on 09/09/25 at 12:11 P.M. with Director of Maintenance #458 revealed that maintenance runs water in all rooms and that water is tested with an instant read tester for Legionella randomly and a sample is sent out yearly for testing. Maintenance Director did not know if tracking sheets for the flushes or the yearly test results were available due to only working there since June. Interview on 09/09/25 at 3:13 P.M. with Director of Maintenance #458 revealed a document titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of medical record, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure there was an adequate supply of linens to meet resident needs. This affected Resident #10. The facility also failed to ensure shower chairs were in good repair and functional in the 100-hall shower room. This affected 28 residents (#5, #6, #8, #10, #13, #17, #18, #20, #24, #25, #26, #28, #32, #33, #34, #38, #39, #41, #43, #44, #45, #46, #49, #52, #56, #58, and #63) identified by the facility as using this shower room and residing in the 100 and 200 halls. The facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment in resident rooms. This affected two residents (#10 and #17). The facility failed to ensure resident window shades were in functional working order. This affected two residents (#22 and #51). The facility failed to ensure baseboard heater covers were in place and intact in resident rooms. This affected Resident #20. The facility failed to ensure the walls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of medical record, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide care and services in the area of personal hygiene. This affected four residents (#8, #20, #31, and #44) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 60.1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 06/27/25 with diagnoses of thyroid disorder, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), non-Alzheimer ' s dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed moderate cognitive impairment and a requirement of substantial assistance with showering or bathing. Observation on 09/09/25 at 9:21 A.M. revealed Resident #31 sitting in a chair in the common area on the memory care unit with greasy unkept hair and approximately three quarter to one inch hair cluster growth on chin. Interview on 09/09/25 at 12:22 P.M. with Unit Manager #463 confirmed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility pest control documentation, the facility failed to ensure effective insect control was implemented. This affected 10 of 16 residents (#10, #17, #18, #20, #38, #44, #23, #45, #22, #51) reviewed for physical environmental conditions in a facility census of 60. 1.) Observation of Resident #38 on 09/09/25 at 10:36 A.M. revealed the resident was in bed with multiple black flying insects in room and landing on various surfaces. 2.) Observation of Resident #20 on 09/09/25 at 10:50 A.M. revealed black flying insects were observed in the room, landing on resident and bedside beverages sitting on the over bed table. Resident #20 stated insects were visible for an undescribed time and at times landed on food. 3.) Observation of Resident #44 on 09/10/25 at 12:01 P.M. revealed the resident was seated in room at the side of the bed. Black flying insects were noted landing on personal property and beverages. Resident #44 was observed swatting at the pest. On 09/09/25 at 1:34…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to properly complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS). This affected one resident (#30) reviewed for vision. The facility census was 60.Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/03/25. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, altered mental status, and malnutrition. Review of Resident #30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had an intact cognition. His vision was marked as adequate and no corrective lenses were required. Review of Resident #30's most recent care plan revealed the resident received optical services, but the record was absent to vision loss. Review of Resident #30's physician note dated 03/24/25 revealed previous to entering the facility he began loosing his vision and became nearly blind. Review of Resident #30's outside eye exam report dated 04/09/25 revealed the resident had other eye problems and required a referral for cataract surgery. The resident had dense…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan was individualized to meet resident needs. This affected one (#08) of one resident revealed for base line care plans. The facility census was 60. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 07/02/25 with diagnoses of acute cystitis, cerebral infarction, heartburn, anorexia, personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), nicotine dependence, hypomagnesemia, other specified health status, major depressive disorder, adult failure to thrive, altered mental status (AMS), Alzheimer's disease, other acquired deformity of head, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #08 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, indicating Resident #08 was severely cognitively impaired. Further review of the MDS assessment for Resident #08 revealed she required substantial or maximal assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure venous ulcer preventions were in place. This deficient practice affected one (#45) of one residents reviewed for venous ulcers. The facility census was 60.Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/02/25. Diagnoses included local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of the left and right lower extremity, non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left foot and right lower leg with fat layer exposed, pressure-induced deep tissue damage of the right buttock, pressure-induced deep tissue damage of the right sacral region, pressure-induced deep tissue damage of the left buttock, hypertension, and muscle wasting. Review of Resident #45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #45 was always incontinent of bowel and frequently incontinent of urine, there was a risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of facility medical record, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services to promote healing. This affected two resident (#10 and #45) of two residents reviewed for pressure. The facility census was 60. 1.) Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 07/11/25 with diagnoses of pressure ulcer of sacral region stage four, type two diabetes mellitus (DM2), long-term (current) use of insulin, cutaneous abscess of right lower leg (RLL), acute embolism and thrombosis of left femoral vein, cutaneous abscess of right foot, encounter for other specified surgical aftercare, retention of urine, hypotension (HOTN), hypertension (HTN), hyperlipemia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), major depressive disorder, respiratory disorders in disease classified elsewhere, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation (a. fib), and morbid obesity due to excess…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention devices were implemented as indicated. This affected two of two residents (#38, #44) reviewed for fall prevention interventions in a facility census of 60. 1.Resident #38 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, bipolar disorder, dysphagia, epilepsy, disorder of psychological development, major depression, and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. According to the most recent minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #38 with severely impaired cognition, exhibited physical and other behavioral symptoms, required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living, incontinent of bowel and bladder, received mechanically altered diet, at risk for pressure ulcer development with no current skin breakdown, received antibiotic, antidepressant, antianxiety and anticonvulsant medications. On 08/07/25 a nursing plan of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to provide tracheostomy care and maintenance as ordered by the physician. This affected one of one residents (#6) reviewed for tracheostomy care in a facility census of 60. Resident #6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy, acute kidney failure, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and anxiety disorder. According to the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #6 with intact cognition, no listed behaviors, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, received oxygen and tracheostomy treatments. Review of physician orders dated 01/09/22 noted tracheostomy (trach) skin around stoma site and under ties to be assessed during trach care every shift. Notify physician if redness, irritation, drainage, alteration to skin integrity. In addition, trach care is to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to provide a clean, well-maintained, and homelike environment. This affected 10 (#7, #9, #20, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, and #50) of 63 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Observation on 06/30/25 at 6:45 A.M. of the room occupied by Resident #50 revealed spider webs in the right corner of the window sill between the blind and window, the cover for the radiant heater was not properly attached on the left side and was laying on the floor, the window sill had four pieces of missing laminate and two additional areas of missing laminate covered with an unknown substance in an attempt to repair them. The window sill also contained an approximately six inch long crack extending from front to back, an area of missing paint on the wall above the bed approximately two inches long and three inches wide. There was an approximately six inches long and 10 inches wide section of wall covered with plaster and not painted above the resident's bed to the left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based medical record review, review of care conference documentation, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were held for residents as required. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for timely care planning conferences. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 01/16/25 with diagnoses including encephalitis, dementia, abnormal findings of the lung field, latent tuberculosis, hypokalemia, and restlessness and agitation. Further review revealed Resident #1 had a discharge date of 06/05/25. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating Resident #1 was cognitively impaired. Further review of the MDS assessment for Resident #1 revealed she required assistance with all functional abilities. Review of the facility supplied care conference documentation for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility clinical protocol, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent skin breakdown were implemented as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for skin breakdown and pressure relieving interventions in a facility census of 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, multiple sclerosis, coronary artery disease, hypertension, major depressive disorder, metabolic encephalopathy, muscle weakness, and dementia. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living including transfer and bed mobility, noted as incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no current skin breakdown. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a comfortable and homelike environment. This affected three (#18, #27, #49) of six resident rooms observed and had the potential to affected all 26 residents (#39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, and #64) who resided in the memory care unit in a facility census of 64. Findings Include: 1. Observation on 04/30/25 at 6:50 A.M. revealed Resident #53 in the common area of the memory care (MC) unit seated in a wheelchair wearing a heavy winter coat with the hood pulled over her head. Concurrent observation revealed Resident #41 seated in a wheelchair wrapped in a blanket. Interview on 04/30/25 at 7:00 A.M. with Resident #53 verified she was wearing a coat due to the cold air temperature of the MC unit. Resident #53 indicated it was always cold on the MC unit. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) documents, review of product labels, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure chemicals were stored in a safe and secure manner. This had the potential to affect four (#17, #21, #23, and #27) of four residents identified by the facility as being cognitively impaired and independently mobile who resided outside of the memory care (MC) unit. The facility census was 64. Findings Include: Observation on 04/29/25 at 12:53 P.M. of the linen cart located by Resident #12 and Resident #22's room revealed one canister of Sani-Cloth germicidal disposable wipes with a purple colored top and one canister of Sani-Cloth bleach germicidal disposable wipes with an orange colored top. Further observation revealed both canisters were open and accessible to residents. Review of the product label for the Sani-Cloth germicidal disposable wipes revealed they are not skin or baby wipes and to keep out of reach of children. The product label indicated when using the product, wear disposable protective gloves, protective gowns,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, resident representative interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from pervasive odors. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except for 16 (#12, #13, #15, #16, #18, #19, #24, #26, #31, #37, #38, #41, #46, #57, #58, #75) residents identified by the facility as residing on the secured memory care unit. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Observation on 02/19/25 at 9:38 A.M., upon entering the facility, revealed the facility reception area was malodorous. Observation on 02/19/25 at 10:30 A.M. revealed the resident halls, excluding the memory care unit, had a pungent odor. A strong foul odor was noted near the nurses station, with no residents present. Interview on 02/19/25 at 10:35 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #148 verified the pungent odor and stated the odor primarily came from the hall where there were residents who declined assistance with care. CNA #148 stated the hall always smelled foul. CNA #148 confirmed the odor was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, physician interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician timely of abnormal laboratory (lab) results. This affected one (#19) of three residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/25/14. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, psychotic disorder, hypertension (HTN), unspecified symbolic dysfunctions, hyperosmolality and hypernatremia, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3B, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/20/25, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was unable to be determined due to Resident #19's cognition. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 had routine labs drawn on 01/15/25, including a complete metabolic panel (CMP) and a complete blood count with differential (CBC w/diff). The labs were resulted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, physician interview, Nephrology Nurse Practitioner (NNP) interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician provided adequate and timely follow up for resident care needs. This affected one resident (#19) of three residents reviewed for physician services. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed and admission date of 11/25/14. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, psychotic disorder, hypertension (HTN), unspecified symbolic dysfunctions, hyperosmolality and hypernatremia, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3B, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/20/25, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was unable to be determined due to Resident #19's cognition. Review of a laboratory (lab) report revealed Resident #19 had a routine complete metabolic panel (CMP) and a complete blood count with differential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure facility air temperatures were maintained at a comfortable and acceptable level. This affected 18 (#2, #3, #5, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, and #29) of 68 residents residing in the facility observed for air temperatures. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Observation during tour of the facility on 12/18/24 between 10:30 A.M. and 10:51 A.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #1 noted the facility heating ventilation and air conditioning was provided by forced air and multiple room furnaces. Each room was equipped with an electric radiant heat baseboard local control unit. Observation of ambient air temperature readings obtained in the memory care unit common corridor which contained eight (#15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, and #22) resident's rooms was 68.7 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Located outside of Resident #15's room was a digital furnace thermostat on the wall of the common corridor. The digital reading on the thermostat was 75…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were collected and completed according to the physician orders. This affected one (Resident #100) of one resident reviewed for laboratory services. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical records for Resident #100 revealed a re-admission date of 09/05/24 and a discharge date of 10/20/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), right sided heart failure (severe), cerebral vascular accident (CVA), and alcohol abuse. Review of the current physician orders dated 10/2024 for Resident #100 revealed laboratory (lab) work was to be drawn weekly for a complete blood count (CBC) (measures the number and types of cells in your blood) and basic metabolic panel (BMP) (measures eight different substances in your blood, including electrolytes and glucose). Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #100 for 09/2024 and 10/2024 revealed lab work was due on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on wound care observation, medical record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during wound care. This affected one (#18) of one resident observed for wound care. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and pressure ulcers. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was cognitively impaired and was admitted with unhealed pressure ulcers. Review of the care plan dated 10/30/24 revealed Resident #18 was care planned for wound care and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for wound care. Interventions included were to provide EBP as ordered (i.e. gowns, gloves, masks, goggles, etc.) to be worn by staff during the following high-contact resident care activities of wound care. Review of the current physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff, resident and family interviews and review of a housekeeping checklist, the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected four (#3, #32, #33 and #44) out of six residents sampled for the environment. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Observation on 07/17/24 from 8:45 A.M. to 9:15 A.M. of the Memory Care Unit revealed a peeling and bulging brown colored laminate floor in front of nurses station; broken and cracked wall bumpers on nurses station with jagged edges exposed to the main hallway; peeling blue carpeting on the bottom half of the wall to the left of the nurses station; six holes in the wall inside an open plastic plate to the left of the nurses station; a thick layer of dust on the fan paddles above the nurses station; peeling and missing wallpaper approximately six inches by eight inches in the hallway outside room [ROOM NUMBER]; food items on the floor in the hallway outside room [ROOM NUMBER]; deep white…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and facility medication administration policy, the facility failed to ensure medications to treat migraine headaches were provided as ordered by the physician resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one resident (#12) reviewed for the administration of medications in a facility census of 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, mononeuropathy, major depression, and cervicalgia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #12 with intact cognition, and independent with activities of daily living. Review of the nursing plan of care dated 09/04/22, revealed it was revised to address Resident #12's acute/chronic pain related to arthritis, depression, neuropathy, overweight, gout, migraine, and muscle spasm. Interventions included: to administer analgesia as per orders.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for self-administration of prescription medications prior to maintaining them at bedside. This affected one (#50) of two residents reviewed for medication self-administration. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 08/13/19 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had intact cognition, was independently mobile with a cane, and was not resistive to care or did not demonstrate behaviors. Review of a physician order dated 01/06/22 and discontinued 01/30/24 at 1:21 P.M. revealed Resident #50 received Proair hydrofluroalkane (HFA) 90 micrograms (mcg) (200 inhalations (INH)) with directions to use two puffs inhale orally every six hours as needed for bronchospasm. There was no physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for residents identified to use call lights to request care. This affected two (#36 and #37) of eleven residents observed for call lights within reach. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 01/24/24 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction and muscle weakness. Review of the admission Nursing Observation completed 01/24/24 revealed Resident #36 was alert to person and was verbally appropriate. Review of the current care plan for Resident #36 revealed he was at high risk for falls. Interventions included keeping the call light within reach, and prompt responses to all requests for assistance. Observations on 01/30/24 between 9:18 A.M. and 9:32 A.M. revealed Resident #36 calling out for help. Observation on 01/30/24 at 9:32 A.M. revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #107 entering Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family and staff interview, record review, review of the appointment calendar, review of Weather Underground website, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance with dressing for a resident who was dependent on staff with activities of daily living. This affected one (#18) of three residents reviewed for outside appointments. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 11/25/14 with diagnoses of dementia and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was rarely/never understood and required substantial/maximal assistance for dressing her upper and lower body. Resident #18 experienced no rejection of care or behaviors during this assessment period. Review of the current care plan, updated 10/29/23, revealed Resident #18 she had an activities of daily life self-care performance deficit. Interventions included total assistance by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bariatric incontinence supplies were available to allow a resident to void in a dignified manner. This affected one (#80) of three residents reviewed for bariatric supplies. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 01/12/24 with diagnoses of heart failure, gout, and morbid obesity. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #80 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for rolling left and right and required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting and hygiene. Resident #80 was occasionally incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of stool. Review of the progress note dated 01/12/24 at 1:28 P.M. revealed Resident #80 arrived at the facility. The progress note dated 01/12/24 at 7:58 P.M. revealed Resident #80 requested to use the bed pan, and requested a bariatric bed pan. The nurse and aide were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) report, review of the daily posted staffing, review of employment dates, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight hours each day. This had the potential to affect all 75 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the PBJ report for quarter two of the 2023 fiscal year revealed the facility had a high number of days without RN coverage. Review of posted daily staffing schedules from 08/27/23 through 09/27/23 revealed the facility had no RN coverage on 08/30/23, 08/31/23, 09/01/23, 09/02/23, 09/03/23, 09/04/23, 09/05/23, 09/06/23, 09/09/23, 09/10/23, 09/17/23, 09/20/23, 09/21/23, and 09/22/23. Interview on 09/26/23 at 7:20 A.M. with Regional Clinical Director (RCD) #362 revealed she learned on 09/22/23 the facility had a RN on-call on the weekends but did not have a RN scheduled and working in the facility for eight hours on Saturdays and Sundays. Interview on 09/27/23 at 10:50 A.M. the Administrator verified the facility reviewed RN staffing coverage from 06/01/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored on the memory care unit. This affected one (#29) of one residents reviewed for medication storage and had the potential to affect 13 (#3, #5, #6, #21, #32, #36, #50, #53, #58, #64, #65, #122, and #127) additional cognitively impaired and independently mobile residents identified by the facility residing on the secured memory care unit. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented as care planned. This affected two (#8 and #172) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/25/20. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of pharmacy delivery manifest, the facility failed to obtain medications as prescribed by the physician for administration. This affected five (#17, #25, #59, #57, and #71) of six residents observed and reviewed for the provision of medications. Facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Observation on 09/26/23 at 9:15 A.M. noted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #331 assembling Resident #17's morning medications. LPN #331 stated Resident #17's Norco 5-325 milligrams (mg) was not available and proceeded to contacted the facility pharmacy via telephone at 9:20 A.M. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed Norco 5-325 mg was ordered on 07/29/23 to be administered four times a day at 9:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., 5:00 P.M., 9:00 P.M. On 09/26/23 at 9:23 A.M. interview with LPN #331 revealed Resident #17's Norco 5-325 mg medication was not available from the pharmacy and would not be administered. 2. Observation on 09/26/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the administration of medications with an error rate of less than five percent. A total of 15 errors were observed during 30 opportunities for a medication error rate of 50%. This affected five (#16, #17, #25, #17, #57, #59) of six residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Observation on 09/26/23 at 9:15 A.M. noted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #331 assembling Resident #17's morning medications. LPN #331 stated Resident #17 Norco 5-325 milligrams (mg) was not available and proceeded to contacted the facility pharmacy via telephone at 9:20 A.M. At 9:23 A.M. LPN #331 stated Resident #17 Norco 5-325 mg medication was not available from the pharmacy and would not be administered. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed Norco 5-325 mg was ordered on 07/29/23 ad to be administered four times a day at 9:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., 5:00 P.M., 9:00 P.M. 2. Observation on 09/26/23 at 9:53 A.M. noted LPN #331…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide medications in accordance with physicians orders which resulted in medication significant medication errors. This affected four (#17, #25, #57, and #71) of six residents observed and reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Observation on 09/26/23 at 9:15 A.M. noted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #331 assembling Resident #17's morning medications. LPN #331 stated Resident #17 Norco 5-325 milligrams (mg) was not available and proceeded to contacted the facility pharmacy via telephone at 9:20 A.M. At 9:23 A.M. LPN #331 stated Resident #17 Norco 5-325 mg medication was not available from the pharmacy and would not be administered. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed Norco- 5-325 mg was ordered on 07/29/23 ad to be administered four times a day at 9:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., 5:00 P.M., 9:00 P.M. 2. Observation on 09/26/23 at 10:05 A.M. noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered pneumococcal vaccines per CDC guidelines. This affected five (#3, #9, #21 #30, and #32) of five residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/27/23. Diagnoses included paranoid personality disorder, hypertension, edema, dementia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/18/23, revealed Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired. Additionally, Resident #3 was not up to date on pneumococcal vaccination and the vaccination had been offered and declined. Review of Resident #3's immunization record revealed the resident received Prevnar 13 on 07/20/16. Additional review revealed no evidence Resident #3 received a dose of PCV20 or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, family and resident interview, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice to get out of bed. This affected one (#8) out of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 08/02/23. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, spastic cerebral palsy, convulsions, pressure ulcers, and contracture to right hand. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 08/07/23, revealed Resident #8 was rarely/never understood and was dependent on two people for transfers. Observations on 09/25/23 at 9:50 A.M., 2:27 P.M., and 3:23 P.M. revealed Resident #8 lying in bed. Interview on 09/25/23 at 2:13 P.M. with Resident #8's brother revealed the family would like Resident #8 out of bed at least four hours per day due to a previous urologist's recommendation to decreased Resident #8's risk of kidney stones. Observations on 09/26/23 at 9:21 A.M., 11:28 A.M., 12:51 P.M., 1:56 P.M., 3:13 P.M., and 4:00 P.M. revealed Resident #8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to obtain written authorizations by the resident or representative to open a Resident Trust account. This affected two (#53, #16) of six residents reviewed for Resident Trust accounts. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 12/08/21. Review of the quarterly statement documentation, Resident #53 had an established trust account with transactions dating between 04/01/23 and 08/03/23. The current balance was $500.48. No written authorization was provided stating Resident #53 authorized the facility to manage a resident trust account. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed a readmission date of 03/20/20. Review of the quarterly statement documentation, Resident #16 had an established trust account with transactions dating between 04/01/23 and 08/17/23. The current balance was $1,143.15. No written authorization was provided stating Resident #16 authorized the facility to manage a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the current code status was present on both the electronic medical record (EMR) and the paper medical record (PMR) for two (#122 and #24) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #122's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/22/23. Diagnoses included non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of left foot limited to breakdown of skin, altered mental status, dementia, hypertension, and osteoarthritis. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and Paper Medical Record (PMR) revealed no documentation of Resident #122's code status. Interview on 09/26/23 at 7:30 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #361 revealed a resident's code status should be in both the EMR and PMR. LPN #361 looked at Resident #122's EMR and verified the resident's code status was not present. LPN #361 began looking through Resident #122's PMR and found code status sheets for both Full Code and Do Not Resuscitate in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 2 evaluation was completed for one (#27) of three residents reviewed for PASRR evaluations. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 03/26/22 with diagnoses of encephalopathy and schizophrenia. Review of a PASRR Result Notice dated 03/23/22 revealed Resident #27 was referred for a Level 2 evaluation. Review of a document titled PASRR Outcome Explanation Determination, dated 04/11/22, revealed the Level 2 evaluation could not be completed because the information required information was not available to complete a determination. Interview on 09/26/23 at 7:46 A.M. with Social Services Director #311 confirmed a PASRR Level 2 evaluation was not completed as requested on 03/23/22 for Resident #27. Interview on 09/28/23 at 7:55 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the Social Services Director was responsible for completing PASRR screening and evaluations. The Administrator and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were provided with scheduled bathing and effective hygiene. This affected three (#16, #25, #61) of 29 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) and hygiene. Facility census 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Huntington's disease, anxiety disorder, gastrostomy, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, protein calorie malnutrition, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/04/23, Resident #16 was assessed with severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for completion of activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 02/08/21 revealed Resident #16 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to disease process, Huntington's disease, and cerebral vascular accident. Interventions included the resident was dependent on staff to provide bath or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure activities who were in bed were provided activities of interest. This affected two (#16 and #8) of two residents reviewed for the provision of activities in a facility census of 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Huntington's disease, anxiety disorder, gastrostomy, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, protein calorie malnutrition, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/04/23, revealed Resident #16 was assessed with severely impaired cognition and adequate vision and hearing. Review of the plan of care dated 09/30/21 revealed Resident #16 was dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs secondary to physical limitations. Interventions included staff to converse with resident while providing care, ensure the activities the resident is attending are compatible with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, family interview, staff interview, and review of the medical record, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to maintain range of motion (ROM). This affected one (#8) of one resident reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 08/02/23 with diagnoses of quadriplegia, spastic cerebral palsy, convulsions, and contracture to right hand. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/07/23, revealed Resident #8 had functional limitation in ROM on one side of his upper body and no impairment to ROM to his lower extremity. Review of the Occupational Therapy Discharge Summary for Resident #8, dated 08/18/23, revealed recommendations to place wash cloths in both hands to keep digits from touching palm of hands. Review of the care plan and physicians orders revealed no interventions for the use of a wash cloth to Resident #8's hands. Observation on 09/25/23 at 9:50 A.M. revealed Resident #8 lying in bed. Resident #8's right hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of the medical record, and review of supply invoices, the facility failed to provide nutrition supplements as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#29) of one resident reviewed for nutrition supplements. The facility identified five residents who receive the nutrition supplement. Further, the facility failed to obtain weekly weights and ensure adequate water was provided to a resident with an enteral tube. This affected one (#8) of two residents reviewed for feeding tubes. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/25/20. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/06/23, revealed Resident #29 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of a plan of care focus area,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an abdominal binder was in place to secure a gastrostomy tube (Gtube) and prevent leakage for one (#16) out of two residents reviewed for Gtubes. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Huntington's disease, anxiety disorder, gastrostomy, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, protein calorie malnutrition, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 09/04/23, revealed Resident #16 was assessed with severely impaired cognition and receives nutrition via tube feeding. Review of physician orders noted on 04/27/23 a physician order was initiated for an abdominal binder to secure gastrostomy tube every shift. Review of nurses notes dated 09/07/23 at 7:31 P.M. revealed nurse was informed by aide the patient's tube feeding leaked into bed. Nurse went into room to assess resident. Top of the Gtube opening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure supplemental oxygen was administered only with a physician's order and failed to ensure tracheostomy care was provided per physician orders. This affected two (#25, #46) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care and services. Facility census 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 admitted to facility on 03/01/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type II diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, dementia, major depression, coronary heart disease, hypertension, inflammatory disease of prostate, anxiety, and chronic hepatitis. According to the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #25 with ability to make needs known, intact cognition, requires assistance from staff with bathing, dressing, set-up help with hygiene, and received oxygen therapy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and pharmacy delivery manifest, the facility failed to place accurate documentation within the contents medical record. This affected three (#29, #45, and #71) of 23 residents reviewed for medical record entries in a facility census of 75. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/09/23 and a discharge date of 08/31/23. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, cirrhosis of liver, ascites, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hepatic failure, depression, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #71 was ordered Xifaxan oral tablet 550 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth two times a day for cirrhosis of the liver. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 08/09/23 through 08/27/23 revealed xifaxan was documented as administered on 08/10/23 and both morning and evening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents rooms were maintained in a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This affected four (#8, #27, #28, and #52) of five residents reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Observation of Resident #8's room and interview on 09/26/23 at approximately 11:00 A.M. with Regional Maintenance #365 confirmed the wallpaper alongside Resident #8's bed was torn. The tears covered approximately one-third of the wall space alongside Resident #8's bed. Observation and interview on 09/26/23 at 4:00 P.M. with Resident #8's sister revealed Resident #8 faced the window and the blinds on the windows did not function with the pull cords. Resident #8's sister moved each blind by hand so Resident #8 could see out the window. During the observations and interview wth Resident #8's sister beginning on 09/26/23 at 4:00 P.M., Regional Maintenance #365 entered the room and confirmed the blinds did not function with the pull cord. 2. Observation on 09/25/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This affected two (#28 and #29) of three residents reviewed for pest control with the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Observation on 09/25/23 at 11:03 A.M. of Resident #29's room revealed seven styrofoam cups on the floor next to the bed. Approximately three flies were observed around the resident's bed and cups. Observation on 09/26/23 at 9:37 A.M. of Resident #29's room revealed multiple flies in the room. Concurrent interview of Resident #29 revealed the resident stated I have two flies in here and I can't get rid of them. I don't like them. Observation on 09/26/23 at 12:06 P.M. revealed Resident #29 sitting in the dining room on the secured memory care unit. Resident #29's lunch meal was sitting in front of her. A fly was observed to land on the resident's vegetables. Resident #29 swatted the fly away. Interview on 09/25/23 at 12:34 P.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #302 verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-25 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — pattern
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure two residents (#108 and #109) were not involuntary secluded to their rooms unnecessarily. Additionally, the facility failed to resume communal dining. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility with the exception of three residents (#12, #20, and #39) who were identified as not receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #108's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included complete traumatic amputation between right hip and knee, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), schizoaffective disorder, major depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder. According to the clinical health status assessment dated [DATE], Resident #108 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-25 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the scheduled meal times, observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain adequate staffing in the kitchen to ensure meals were served in a timely manner. This affected all residents who eat their meals provided from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#12, #20, and #39) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Observation of the lunch meal on 05/17/21 revealed the meal cart arrived on the 100 hall at 12:20 P.M. Observation of the 200 hall revealed the meal cart had not arrived until 1:00 P.M. Further observation of the 300/400 halls, revealed the meal cart arrived at 1:10 P.M. Multiple residents were observed sitting in the doorways to their rooms asking when their lunches were coming. Interview with Dietary Aide #200 on 05/17/21 at 3:15 P.M. revealed the lunch meal should have been started at 11:30 A.M. and arrived to the floors by 12:00 P.M. She further stated there was only herself and the cook today and there should have been two dietary aides. She verified the lunch trays for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, policy review, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to adhere to the following recommended infection control practices for preventing the spread of Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) related to ensuring new resident admissions were placed on transmission-based precautions for the recommended 14 days. This affected one resident (#46) of six new resident admissions. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a urinary collection device was properly stored for Resident #46. This had the potential to affect one resident (#39) who shared the same bathroom. Lastly, the facility failed to ensure a Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine was offered to one resident (#12) of three reviewed for vaccine status. The facility census was 61. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/19/21. The resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and re-admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly assess and provide appropriately fitting, physically intact resident wheelchairs, chairs and bed. This deficient practice affected three residents (#41, #109, #12) of 24 reviewed for furniture and assistive devices. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #41 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, history of stage 4 pressure ulcer to the sacral region and stage 2 diabetic ulcer to the foot, cellulitis right lower limb, and hyperlipidemia. According to the most current minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #41 was identified as having intact cognition. Review of a 04/28/21 physical therapy (PT) evaluation noted Resident #41 to be seen three to five times weekly for four weeks using therapeutic exercises, therapeutic activity, neuromuscular re-education, wheelchair management. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, interview with resident's representative, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic guidance, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recommendations, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with in-person visitation opportunities. This deficient practice affected one resident (#25) of three reviewed for family visitation. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, dementia, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, chronic kidney disease, Alzheimer's disease, Covid-19, and anxiety. According to the most current minimum data set(MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident with severe cognitive impairment. On 05/18/21 at 11:15 A.M. interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 and LPN #201 revealed Resident #25's granddaughter was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility resident smoking policy, the facility failed to complete accurate resident smoking assessments and monitor for smoking compliance for one resident (#43) to ensure resident safety. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#44) had elopement prevention devices applied as ordered by the physician. This affected two residents (#43 and #44) of 24 residents reviewed for the potential for elopement and safe smoking in a facility census of 61. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, dementia, lack of coordination, bipolar disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, delusional disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and coronary heart disease. According to the most current minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #43 was identified with severe cognitive impairment. Review of the safe smoking evaluation dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's access to dialysis (fistula) was assessed and documented daily. This affected one resident (#34) of one reviewed for dialysis. The facility was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and end stage renal dialysis with dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the plan of care for Resident #34 dated 11/0718 revealed the resident did receive dialysis three days a week. It was noted the resident had a fistula (surgically implanted dialysis access site) which was to be assessed by nursing staff for functioning (thrill and bruit) daily. There was no evidence in the resident's medical record the fistula was assessed. Interview with Resident #34 on 05/17/21 at 3:00 P.M. revealed nursing staff did not routinely check his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, policy review, and manufacturer recommendations for use instructions the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. There were 27 opportunities were observed with eight medication errors for a calculated medication error rate of 29.63%. This affected two residents (#33, #41) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, muscle weakness, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, abnormal posture, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, major depression, history of urinary tract infection, and supra-pubic urinary catheter. Observation on 05/18/21 at 8:11 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 prepared medications for Resident #33. Medications included one 81 milligram (mg) chewable aspirin, two 4%…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, policy review, and manufacturer recommendations for use the facility failed to ensure the administration of insulin included the proper dosage which resulted in a significant medication error for one resident (#41) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes. Review of the physician orders dated 05/21/20 revealed an order for Lantus Solos Injection Insulin Gargine Solution inject eight units subcutaneous every 12 hours, and order dated 04/19/21 revealed Novolog Injection Flexpen Insulin Aspart Solution inject per sliding scale four times daily. Sliding scale blood sugar 0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) to 199 mg/dL give zero units, 200 mg/dL to 249 mg/dL give two units, 250 mg/dL to 299 mg/dL give three units, 300 mg/dL to 349 mg/dL give four units, 350 mg/dL and over give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory testing was obtained in a timely manner. This affected two residents (#33 and #32) of 24 reviewed for laboratory testing. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, muscle weakness, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, abnormal posture, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, major depression, history of urinary tract infection, and supra-pubic urinary catheter. Review of the nursing plan of care revised date 02/14/21 to address the residents diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Interventions included give medications as ordered, monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness, monitor/document/report to physician as needed signs and symptoms of damage to motor and sensory control centers: urinary frequency, urgency or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received offered ancillary dental services. This affected one resident (#38) of one resident reviewed for dental services, who had poor oral health. The facility identified 42 residents who received dental services provided by the facility's ancillary dental service. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included muscle disorder, chronic low back pan, psychoactive substance abuse, chronic pressure ulcers, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, colostomy status, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, paraplegia and bilateral above the knee amputations. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits, had rejection of care four to six days of the assessment period. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to provide rehabilitation therapy to maintain functional abilities. This affected one resident (#109) of two residents reviewed for rehabilitation services and new admission. The facility census was 61. Findings include; Review of the medical record revealed Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included severely comminuted distal femur fracture periprosthetic with surgical correction, muscle weakness, periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left hip, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, anemia, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, pulmonary nodule and history of falling. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident was alert, oriented, able to make needs known with a brief interview for mental status score of 14 indicated intact cognition. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SERENITY EQUITY HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 09/18/2017
ZW AOM RE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 09/18/2017
GOLDSTEIN, JEFFERYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER21%since 01/15/2024
SHERMAN, ALEXANDERIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER17%since 01/15/2024
HOROWITZ, ZALEMANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 09/18/2017
WAGSCHAL, ZALMANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 09/18/2017
WEINBERGER, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 09/18/2017
WHITEHOUSE, HEIDIIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/29/2018
SHERMAN, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/18/2017
AOM HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/18/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$382K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 26%Medicare 2%Other / private 72%

This home reported $382K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$287per resident / day
operating cost
$8,727per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$261per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366041. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next