No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Good Shepherd Village

422 North Burnett Road, Springfield, OH 45503 · For profit - Corporation · 81 certified beds · (937) 322-1911 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 322-1911 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2025Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)1 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
38 S Burnett Rd · (937) 717-4370 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.3 mi
2609 E Main St · (937) 322-7586 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.2 mi
2728 E Main St · (937) 525-6750 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.5%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.6%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.4%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.7%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.4%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.4%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.9%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
48.6%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 58.2 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

28
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-01)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2020-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of information from National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to implement preventative pressure ulcer interventions for a resident who was admitted with a pressure ulcer to the heel and failed to complete an ongoing assessment including staging of a pressure ulcer. This resulted in Actual Harm when staff failed to implement pressure ulcer preventative interventions for Resident #55 who was at risk for pressure ulcer development, was admitted with mushy heels (pressure ulcer) and subsequently the resident developed an unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel. This affected one (#55) out of two reviewed for pressure ulcers. Facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/08/19. Diagnoses included hypertension, major depressive disorder, macular degeneration, type II diabetes mellitus, and renal insufficiency. Review of a facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure meals were palatable and served at proper temperature. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents who receive their meals from the kitchen. Findings include:Interview on 06/22/26 at 3:47 P.M. with Resident #7 reported the food was terrible and most of the time it was cold, had no taste, and meats were tough.Review of the dinner menu for 06/24/26 revealed dinner was a chicken ranch wrap, side salad, vegetable soup, and a slice of yellow cake for dessert.Observations of holding temperatures at the start of dinner service on 06/24/26 at 5:07 P.M. revealed the chicken strips in the chicken ranch wrap were 170 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the vegetable soup was 178 degrees F.Observation of the test tray at the end of dinner service and interview with Dietary Manager (DM) #158 on 06/24/26 at 6:20 P.M. revealed the chicken strips in the chicken ranch wrap were 83 degrees F and falling. The wrap was bland, cold and soggy. DM #158 confirmed the temperature of the chicken strips was outside of safe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation on the disposition of controlled substances. This affected one (Resident #20) of one resident reviewed for pain management. This had the potential to affect 31 residents at the facility who utilize controlled substances. The facility census was 59.Findings include:Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic pain. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had intact cognition and pain in thoracic spine.Review of Medication Monitoring/Control Records for Resident #20 revealed one Hydrocodone five milligrams (mg)/Acetaminophen (Scheduled II controlled substance) 325 mg tablet was removed from locked storage for Resident #20's administration six times on [DATE] at 6:00 P.M., [DATE] at 5:10 P.M., [DATE] at 10:34 A.M., [DATE] at 5:03 P.M., [DATE] at 1:48 P.M., and [DATE] at 9:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and medical record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's preferences for bathing. This affected one (Resident #77) of three residents reviewed for preferences. The facility census was 59.Findings include:Review of Resident #77's medical record revealed the resident had an admission date of 6/03/26. Diagnoses include acute and chronic respiratory failure, chronic diastolic failure, cerebral infarction, and weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment last revised on 6/10/26 revealed Resident #77 did not have any memory issues and required substantial/maximal assistance from staff with bathing and showering.Review of Resident #77's preferences dated 6/03/26 revealed the resident preferred to have showers.Review of the care plan last revised 06/04/26 revealed Resident #77 was at risk for decline in actives of daily living (ADL) related to a fall at home. Interventions include allow time for rest breaks and encourage the resident to participate in ADLs.Review of the shower log revealed Resident #77 received a bed bath…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly care conferences were offered/completed for Resident #34 and failed to ensure Resident #12's care plan was updated timely. This affected one (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for care plan conferences and one (Resident #12) of 24 residents reviewed for care plan revisions. The facility census was 59.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 05/08/23. Diagnoses included anxiety, insomnia, diabetes mellitus, chronic pulmonary disease, and heart failure. Review of the care conference documentation revealed care conferences were held on 06/30/25, 11/30/25, 01/22/26 and 04/22/26. The record review found no evidence of care conference being held for five months until 11/30/25. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had intact cognition and was independent with most activities of daily living and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, hospice interview, the failed to provide joint collaborative effort and ongoing hospice communication when Resident #61 exhibited a change in condition. This affected one (Resident #61) of two residents reviewed for death. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral atherosclerosis The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #61 was admitted to Hospice with a hospice diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. Review of the nursing documentation dated [DATE] at 5:00 A.M. revealed Resident #61's treatment was completed as physician ordered. Resident #61 continued with a rattle to chest, and denies pain or discomfort. There was no documentation that hospice, the physician, or the resident's representative were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, policy review, and review of manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance were provided to the residents to prevent falls and failed to complete thorough investigations into the resident's falls. This affected two (Residents #54 and #61) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 59.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, general anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness.Review of the physician orders dated 09/19/24 revealed Resident #61 was admitted to hospice with a primary diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. Resident #61 was in the terminal stage of illness and required intensive monitoring and care coordination.Review of the care plan dated 09/24/24 and last revised on 05/12/26 revealed Resident #61 was a low risk for falls related to gait/balance problems with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who had a history of septic shock and urinary tract infection (UTI) received physician ordered antibiotics to treat the UTI and seen by infectious disease as recommended on the hospital discharge orders. This affected one (Resident #67) of five residents reviewed for UTIs. The facility census was 59.Findings include:Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/06/25. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, sepsis, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. The significant change Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment completed 08/22/25 revealed Resident #67 had short- and long-term memory impairment, was not oriented to person, place, or time, and was dependent on staff assistance for all personal care.Review of the nursing progress notes revealed Resident #67 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 06/06/25 for septic shock secondary to catheter-associated urinary tract infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's oxygen was being administered according to physician orders. This affected three (Residents #34, #47, and #75) of four residents reviewed for oxygen. The facility census was 59.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 05/08/23. Diagnoses included chronic pulmonary disease and heart failure. Review of the physician orders dated 08/15/25 revealed oxygen should be set to four liters via nasal cannula. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 intact cognition and was independent with most activities of daily living and mobility. Review of the plan of care dated 06/08/26 revealed Resident #34 was on oxygen therapy with interventions for oxygen settings of four liters delivered by nasal cannula. Observation and interview on 6/22/26 at 12:35 P.M. with Resident #34 revealed she thought…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to have a complete policy to address when it was the facilities responsibility to replace lost or missing dentures. This affected one (Resident #36) of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 59.Findings include:Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/07/24. Diagnoses included paraplegia, psychoactive substance abuse, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had intact cognition. Review of the care plan dated 03/05/25 revealed Resident #36 had oral and dental health problems to rule out injury, poor nutrition, and poor oral hygiene. The care plan did not address that Resident #36 had dentures and did not have interventions for cleaning the dentures and safe place for storage of the dentures.Interview on 06/24/26 at 11:47 A.M. with Resident #36 revealed on or around the evening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, medical record record review, meals substitute log review, menu review, diet tech audit review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow meal tickets and scheduled menu and an updated/ accurate substitution log. This affected two (#16 and #30) of three residents reviewed for nutrition with potential to affect all residents who receive meals from the dining room. Facility identified all facility residents eat food from the kitchen. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 08/13/24. Diagnoses included pneumonia, malnutrition, hemiplegia, heart failure, vascular disease, and respiratory failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 11. Interview and observation on 04/28/25 at 12:34 P.M. with Resident #30 revealed the food that was served did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an observation, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, diet tech audit review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food had a palatable taste and was served at an appetizing temperature. This affected four (#1, #16, #30, and #367) of six residents reviewed for dietary needs. The facility identified all residents eat food from the kitchen. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 08/13/24. Diagnoses included pneumonia, malnutrition, hemiplegia, heart failure, vascular disease, and respiratory failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 11. Interview on 04/29/25 at 4:32 P.M. with Resident #7 revealed food wasn't good and didn't have good taste. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #367 revealed an admission date of 03/11/25. Diagnoses included chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Observation of the walk in freezer on 04/28/25 at 8:49 A.M. revealed frozen waffles in a bag without a date. Ice was observed on the tops of boxes of Mighty Shakes and B/C Topping that were stored under the freezer condenser. Interview with the Kitchen Manger (KM) #237 confirmed that the frozen waffles did not have a date. KM #237 confirmed that the condenser appeared to be leaking and creating a build up of ice on the boxes stored below. Observation on 04/28/25 at 8:54 A.M. revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #284 testing the chemical dish machine with a chlorine test strip that appeared to be a light purple. Interview with DA #284 verified that the test strip showed that the chlorine concentration in the dish machine was at 25 parts per million (PPM). DA #284 verified that the dish machine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, facility list review, resident interview, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' personal funds were available in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect 22 Residents (#2, #3, #4, #7, #11, #12, #13, #20, #22, #23, #24, #26, #37, #43, #46, #48, #52, #53, #54, #56, #266, #367) of 22 identified to have personal fund accounts with the facility. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of facility generated list of personal funds account revealed 22 Residents (#2, #3, #4, #7, #11, #12, #13, #20, #22, #23, #24, #26, #37, #43, #46, #48, #52, #53, #54, #56, #266, #367) identified to have personal fund accounts with the facility. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/30/22. Diagnoses include anxiety, schizophrenia, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, Alzheimer's, heart failure, and kidney disease. Interview on 04/29/25 at 8:11 A.M., revealed a concern related to Resident #7 being able to access his personal funds. Resident #7 shared that he is unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical records and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop care plans to meet the needs of the residents. This affected four (#30, #36, #266, and #366) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 08/25/23. Diagnoses included dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three. This resident was assessed to require setup with eating, supervision with toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers. Review of the physician order dated 03/12/25 revealed Resident #36 was ordered Ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg), give one tablet by mouth two times a day for anxiety. Review of the care plan for Resident #36 revealed she did not have a care plan for psychotropic medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interviews, family interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed quarterly and the interdisciplinary team was present for five (#7, #13, #16, #26, and #55) of five residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility also failed to ensure revisions of care plans were updated for six (#7, #18, #30, #33, #51 and #62) of 24 care plans reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 65. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 12/30/22. His medical diagnoses included arteriosclerotic heart disease, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and convulsions. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was severely cognitively impaired. His functional status was setup or clean-up assistance for eating, substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, supervision or touching assistance for bed mobility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of physician orders, staff interviews, Certified Nursing Practitioner interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were clarified when to contact the physician for a resident daily weight change for Resident #41. The facility failed to physician orders were followed to obtain blood sugars and contact the physician when blood sugars were out of the parameters for Resident #51. The facility failed to ensure coordination with hospice services were established for hospice care for Resident #30. The facility failed to ensure skin assessments and treatments were completed for Resident #13. This affected four (#13, #30, #41 and #51) of 24 residents records reviewed for quality of care . The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #41 revealed admission date of 01/09/23, with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, alcohol abuse, chronic viral hepatitis, anxiety and alcohol dependence. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure safe water temperatures in resident rooms. This affected five (#18, #37, #51, #59, and #60) of five residents reviewed for water temperatures. The facility failed to ensure safe smoking parameters were in place for one (#20) of one resident reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 65. Findings include Observation on 04/28/25 at 10:20 A.M., revealed water temperatures of 144 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for the shared bathroom for Residents #18, #37, #51 and #60 had hot water temperatures. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 02/07/25. Diagnoses included shortness of breath, diabetes, and heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 and required supervision or touching assistance with toileting. 2. Review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, review of Medscape resource website and policy review, the facility failed to ensure extended release medications were not crushed, administer medications as ordered and/or in a timely manner. This affected six (#1, #7, #26, #266, #366, and #367 ) of 11 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 65. Findings included: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #366 revealed admission date of 02/19/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including cellulitis, morbid obesity, type two diabetes mellitus, unstageable pressure ulcer of right heel. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. She required set up for eating, was dependent with toileting hygiene, maximum assistance for showers, transfers and moderate assistance for bed mobility. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for Coreg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed ensure medications were not left unattended in residents rooms and safely store medications. This affected three residents (#7, #9 and #41) directly and had the potential to affect the 16 residents who resided on Unit #2. The facility census was 65. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 12/30/22. His medical diagnoses included arteriosclerotic heart disease, Schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and convulsions. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was severely cognitively impaired. His functional status was setup or clean-up assistance for eating, substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, supervision or touching assistance for bed mobility and transfers. He was always incontinent for bladder and codes for a colostomy. He was coded for wandering. Observation on 04/28/25 at 2:59 P.M., revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, recipe review and diet tech audit review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was made to the correct consistency and the menu was followed. This affected four (#27, #46, #54, and #62) of four residents who received purred diets. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Observation and interview on 04/29/25 at 11:14 A.M., with Dietary [NAME] #214 revealed she made four servings of pureed [NAME] chicken. She placed four, four ounce scoops into the blender along with one and a half cups of chicken gravy followed by an additional cup of gravy for a total of two and a half cups of gravy. Dietary [NAME] #214 revealed she was looking for a mashed potato consistency. The mixture was blended and poured into a container without ever scraping the sides. The final mixture was tasted by staff and surveyors and found several chunks of chicken which Dietary [NAME] #214 acknowledged. The mixture was returned to the blender and staff continued to blend to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 vaccines were offered to residents, failed to ensure education was provided related to the vaccination, and further failed to ensure vaccines were administered as consented to. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 vaccination consent forms were thoroughly and accurately completed to reflect resident decisions related to the vaccination. This affected four (#7, #30, #33, and #53) of five residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination status. The facility census was 65. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 02/19/20. Diagnoses included heart disease, schizophrenia, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease and kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/08/25, revealed Resident #7 was cognitively impaired. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence Resident #7 was offered or received the COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, the medical record revealed no evidence the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident bathrooms were free from odors for five (#7, #18, #37, #51, and #60) five residents reviewed for clean and sanitary bathrooms. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the corridors were free from pervasive odors. This affected all residents except for 16 residents (#2, #5, #6, #8, #14, #22, #23, #33, #39, #40, #41, #43, #52, #56, #58, #62) identified as living on the rehabilitation unit. The facility census was 65. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 12/30/22. Diagnoses included arteriosclerotic heart disease, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and convulsions. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/08/25, revealed Resident #7 was severely cognitively impaired. His functional status was setup or clean-up assistance for eating, substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, and supervision or touching assistance for bed mobility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were ordered for an approved diagnosis. This affected one (#9) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 03/08/25. Diagnoses included abdominal pain, spinal stenosis, gastritis and malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 9. Review of active physician orders dated 03/08/25 revealed an order for Aripiprazole oral tab 5 milligrams (mg) once daily in morning (scheduled at 8:00 A.M.) was ordered for Hypotension. This medication is a antipsychotic. Interview on 05/01/25 at 8:42 A.M., with Regional Nurse #500 and Regional Nurse #508 confirmed Ariprprazole (Abilify) was not used to treat hypotension and confirmed the order did not contain an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident family interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to implement the abuse policy for reporting and investigating an alleged injury of unknown origin. This affected one (#55) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 65. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 02/25/25. Her medical diagnoses was multiple sclerosis (MS) and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was rarely or never understood. Her functional status was substantial/maximal assistance for eating, dependent for toileting, bed mobility, and transfers were not attempted due to safety concerns. She used a Hoyer lift. Review of the progress note dated 04/27/25 at 2:47 P.M., documented by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #249, revealed the family approached the nurse regarding a discoloration to resident's left leg. There was bruising seen. The family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident family interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to report an alleged injury of unknown origin. This affected one (#55) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 65. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 02/25/25. Her medical diagnoses was multiple sclerosis (MS) and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was rarely or never understood. Her functional status was substantial/maximal assistance for eating, dependent for toileting, bed mobility, and transfers were not attempted due to safety concerns. She used a Hoyer lift. Review of the progress note dated 04/27/25 at 2:47 P.M., documented by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #249, revealed the family approached the nurse regarding a discoloration to resident's left leg. There was bruising seen. The family stated she gets her leg caught on the Hoyer lift at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident family interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged injury of unknown origin. This affected one (#55) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 65. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 02/25/25. Her medical diagnoses was multiple sclerosis (MS) and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was rarely or never understood. Her functional status was substantial/maximal assistance for eating, dependent for toileting, bed mobility, and transfers were not attempted due to safety concerns. She used a Hoyer lift. Review of the progress note dated 04/27/25 at 2:47 P.M., documented by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #249, revealed the family approached the nurse regarding a discoloration to resident's left leg. There was bruising seen. The family stated she gets her leg caught on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and family interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living was provided oral hygiene. This affected one (#55) of five residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The facility census was 65. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 02/25/25. Her medical diagnoses was Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was rarely or never understood. Her functional status was substantial/maximal assistance for eating, dependent for toileting, bed mobility, and transfers were not attempted due to safety concerns. She used a Hoyer lift. Review of care plan dated 03/05/25 revealed Resident #55 was at risk for poor oral hygiene. Her intervention was to provide mouth care as per the ADL personal hygiene. Interview on 04/28/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure completion of physician ordered treatments to promote wound healing. This affected one (#33) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 09/19/24. Medical diagnoses included sepsis and diabetes mellitus. Review of the care plan dated 10/22/24 for Resident #33 revealed the resident had the potential for pressure ulcers. Interventions were to administer treatments as orders and monitor for effectiveness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was cognitively impaired. Her functional status was dependent for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, and positioning in bed. Review of the physician's orders dated 03/25/25 revealed an order for the left buttock: cleanse with wound cleanser, apply hydrogel, calcium alginate, cover with border…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided correctly. This affected one (#7) of one resident reviewed for incontinence care. The census was 65. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 12/30/22. His medical diagnoses included arteriosclerotic heart disease, Schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and convulsions. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was severely cognitively impaired. His functional status was setup or clean-up assistance for eating, substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, supervision or touching assistance for bed mobility and transfers. He was always incontinent for bladder and codes for a colostomy. He was coded for wandering. Review of the care plan dated 03/16/25 for Resident #7 revealed the resident required staff intervention to complete self-care. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to adequately monitor and implement interventions timely for residents with significant weight loss. This affected three (#18, #26, and #53) residents of eight reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 08/13/24. Diagnoses included dementia, emphysema, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was not able to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) because she was rarely/never understood. This resident was assessed to require setup with eating, supervision with toileting, dressing, and transfers, and independent with bathing. Review of the care plan dated 02/04/25 revealed Resident #53 had a nutritional problem related to mechanical altered texture and consistency and underweight. Interventions included administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, review of the undated manufacture guidelines, and review of Medscape resource website, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent when three medication errors were observed of 25 opportunities resulting in an error rate of 12 percent. This affected three (#26, #266, and #368) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #266 revealed admission date of 06/24/24, with diagnoses including major depression disorder recurrent with severe psychotic symptoms, dementia and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had severely impaired cognition required set up assistance for eating and supervision for bed mobility, transfers and toileting hygiene. Observation of medication administration on 04/29/25 at 7:58 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #293, for Resident #266,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, review of physician orders, staff interview, and review of manufacture guidelines, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected two (#366 and #368) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #366 revealed admission date of 02/19/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including cellulitis, morbid obesity, type two diabetes mellitus, unstageable pressure ulcer of right heel. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. She required set up for eating, was dependent with toileting hygiene, maximum assistance for showers, transfers and moderate assistance for bed mobility. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for Lispro (fast acting insulin) 100 units per (/) milliliter (ml) sliding scale before meals and at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure therapeutic rehabilitation services were provided as ordered. This affected one (#366) of one resident reviewed for reviewed for therapy services. Facility census was 65. Findings include Review of the closed medical record for Resident #366 revealed an admission date of 02/19/25 and discharge 03/28/25. Diagnoses included cellulitis, kidney disease, mood disorder, and diabetes. Review of Hospital referral dated 02/18/25 revealed resident needed skilled rehab stay for wounds and therapy (Physical and Occupational). Review of physician orders dated 02/19/25 for Physical/Occupational/Speech therapy (PT/OT/ST) to evaluate and treat. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #366 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 and was dependant with toileting, substantial /maximum assistance with oral hygiene, bathing, dressing and personal hygiene.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the arbitration agreement, the facility failed to ensure residents understood the arbitration agreement in a simple manner for residents to understand. This affected three (#4, #10, and #57) of 39 residents who had arbitration. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 01/15/24. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus (DM II), schizophrenia, and hypertension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Review of the arbitration agreement dated 01/16/24 revealed Resident #4 signed the arbitration agreement. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene after providing resident care. This affected two residents (#7 and #266). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper disposal of personal protective equipment (PPE) following care provided to Resident #7, who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This affected two residents (#7 and #266) of two residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 65. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 12/30/22. Diagnoses included arteriosclerotic heart disease, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and convulsions. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/08/25, revealed Resident #7 was severely cognitively impaired. His functional status was setup or clean-up assistance for eating, substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, and supervision or touching assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #7 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure influenza (flu) and pneumococcal vaccinations were offered to residents and further failed to ensure education on the vaccinations was provided to residents and/or their representatives. This affected one resident (#7) of five residents reviewed for vaccination status. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 02/19/20. Diagnoses included heart disease, schizophrenia, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease and kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/08/25, revealed Resident #7 was severely cognitively impaired. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence Resident #7 was offered or received the flu or pneumococcal vaccinations or that the resident or resident representative received education on the vaccination. Interview on 05/01/25 at 8:39 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility had no evidence of the flu and pneumococcal vaccinations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical administration record review, staff schedule review, staff interview, agency staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was enough staff available to pass medications in a timely manner. The affected 51 (#1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, #11, #12, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #22, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #41, #42, #43, #45, #46, #48, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #60, #62, #63, #65, #67, #68, #69, #70, and #72) of 51 residents reviewed for staffing needs. The census was 71. Findings included: Review of the electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR) on 03/19/25 between 11:11 A.M. and 2:00 P.M., revealed 51 (#1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, #11, #12, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #22, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #41, #42, #43, #45, #46, #48, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #60, #62, #63, #65, #67, #68, #69, #70, and #72) had not received the physician ordered mediations as ordered for the morning of 03/19/25. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, computer medication administration record review, staff schedule review, staff interview, agency staff interview, and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the continuity of staff to administer medications within the physician ordered time frames. The affected 51 (#1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, #11, #12, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #22, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #41, #42, #43, #45, #46, #48, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #60, #62, #63, #65, #67, #68, #69, #70, #72) of 51 residents reviewed for late mediations. The census was 71. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 02/07/25. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, (CAD) heat failure, diabetes mellitus (DM), and renal insufficiency. Review of the monthly physician orders for March 2025 revealed on 03/19/25, Resident #1 was ordered to receive Tylenol 325 milligram (mg) to be given two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview with wound clinic physician, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to complete physician ordered dressing changes to promote wound healing. This affected one (#18) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 71. Findings included Medical record review for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 07/02/24. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, renal insufficiency, diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the care plan dated 12/19/24 for Resident #18 revealed the resident had the potential for pressure ulcers. Interventions were to administer treatments as orders and monitor for effectiveness. If the resident refuses the treatments confer with the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) and family to determine why and try an alternative method to gain compliance and document alternative methods. An update to the care plan dated 03/16/25 revealed the resident would remove his dressings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Infection Control practices were followed during a pressure ulcer dressing change. This affected one (#18) of three residents reviewed for infection control with pressure sores. This census was 71. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 07/02/24. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, renal insufficiency, diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was severely cognitively impaired. His functional status was setup or clean-up assistance for eating, substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, supervision or touching assistance for bed mobility and transfers. He was always incontinent with his bladder and had an ostomy. Observation of a dressing change for Resident #18, on 03/19/25 at 9:25 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #144,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of grievance forms, observations, staff interviews, review of two employee files, and policy review, the facility staff failed to implement their policy and provide appropriate and timely resolution to one resident's responsible family member's grievance concerning safe Hoyer transfers. This affected one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for grievances. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Clinical record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 12/30/22 with diagnoses including stroke, diabetes, aphasia, anxiety, and bi-polar disorder. He received hospice services since 05/10/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and could not respond or be interviewed. Review of the care plan revised 11/20/23 revealed the resident was at high risk for falls and required staff total assistance for all activities of daily living including Hoyer transfers. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of grievance forms, observations, staff and resident interviews, review of two employee files, and policy review, the facility staff failed to provide safe and appropriate lift transfers and failed to complete an investigation when staff transferred a resident alone with a Hoyer lift. This affected one (Resident #1) observed for safe Hoyer lift transfers. Additionally, the facility failed to provide adequate interventions and/or supervision to ensure a resident who was assessed as being at risk for elopements did not elope from the facility. This affected one (Resident #26) of one resident reviewed for elopements. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Clinical record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 12/30/22 with diagnoses including stroke, diabetes, aphasia, anxiety, and bi-polar disorder. He received hospice services since 05/10/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor blood sugar levels as ordered. This affected one (#60) out of three reviewed for monitoring of blood sugar levels. The facility census was 50. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 10/13/23 with medical diagnoses of hepatic encephalopathy, abdominal pain, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #60 was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate staff assistance with bathing, supervision with toileting and bed mobility, and was independent with transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #60 received seven days of insulin injections. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed a physician order dated 11/06/23 to complete accu checks (finger blood sugar level checks) daily before each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, review of manufacturer's instructions and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered resulting in three medication errors out of 25 opportunities or a 12 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected two (#54 and #68) out of the seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 50. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 01/14/21 with medical diagnoses of gastrointestinal bleed, emphysema, osteoporosis, anemia, gastric esophageal reflux disease (GERD), bipolar disorder, anxiety, and hypertension (HTN). Review of the medial record for Resident #54 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #54 was cognitively intact and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed physician orders dated 11/02/23 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, review of manufacturer's instructions and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an insulin pen was primed per manufacturer's instructions prior to insulin administration resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (#68) out of three residents reviewed for insulin administration. The facility census was 50. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 07/24/23 with medical diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM), severe protein calorie malnutrition, and anemia. Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #68 was cognitively intact and was independent with activities of daily living (ADL's). The MDS indicated Resident #68 received seven days of insulin injections. Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed a physician order, dated 08/16/23, for Humalog Kwikpen subcutaneous (SQ)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and prepared in a safe manner. This affected five (#14, #15, #18, #19, and #24) of five residents reviewed for medication storage. The census was 51. Findings included: Observation of the medication cart on 10/16/23 at 4:40 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #136 was standing at her cart and removed a pre-poured cup of medication for Resident #14 that had the resident's initials written on the side of the cup. Further observation revealed there were two pre-poured medication cups sitting on top of the medication cart as well. Interview with LPN #136 on 10/16/23 at 4:43 P.M. revealed she had two resident's pre-poured medication cups, with initials of residents on the side of the cups, sitting on top of the medication cart and pulled out two more medication cups with resident's initials on the side of those cups out of the drawer of the cart. LPN #136 confirmed she pre-poured the medication for five (#14, #15, #18, #19, and #24) residents, and stated she thought she could pre-pour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews with staff, the physician and the local ombudsman, the facility failed to follow up with a resident's Power of Attorney's concerns/grievances related to the resident's care. This affected one resident (#12) out of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed a readmission date of 04/30/23. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, protein caloric malnutrition, neuromuscular, dysfunction of bladder, aphasia, depression, Parkinson's disease, and heart disease. Review of most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 3.0 dated 08/01/23 for Resident #12, revealed the resident had severe cognitive deficits and was nonverbal. Assessment revealed the resident received hospice services. Review of the Healthcare Power of Attorney (POA) dated 08/07/20, revealed Resident #12 and Resident #12's two children established the Healthcare POA. Resident #12 delegated her daughter as agent number one and the resident's son as agent number two. Review of the facility documents titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-19 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were notified when their account exceeded the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit and failed to convey a resident's funds after the resident expired. This affected four (#15, #37, #19, and #221) of six resident funds accounts reviewed. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's personal funds account revealed a balance of $3,429.00. Record review revealed Resident #15 was a Medicaid recipient. There was no evidence Resident #15 was provided with a notice to spenddown their funds. Review of Resident #19's personal funds account revealed a balance of $4,241.30. Record review revealed Resident #19 was a Medicaid recipient. There was no evidence Resident #19 was provided with a notice to spenddown their funds. Review of Resident #37's personal funds account revealed a balance of $2,521.40. Record review revealed Resident #37 was a Medicaid recipient. There was no evidence Resident #37 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving dialysis treatments had a dialysis care plan. This affected one resident (#65) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include nondisplaced fracture of the right femur, left pubis, lumbar vertebra, and right pubis related to an accidental discharge of a firearm, end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, hemiparesis, type two diabetes, attention deficit disorder, essential hypertension, and anemia. Review of Resident #65's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment and as independent with eating, required limited assistance with bed mobility and required extensive assistance with locomotion, dressing and personal hygiene. Resident #65 received hemodialysis. Review of Resident #65's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to have an effective administration by ensuring staff implemented their Leave of Absence (LOA) policy when a resident frequently left the faciity on LOA's. This affected one (#64) out of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 08/17/22. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, abnormal laboratory values, dysphasia, cardiac pacemaker. The medical record also revealed Resident #64's wife as an emergency contact and not his power of attorney or guardian. Resident #64 discharged to home on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/24/22, revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of eight out of 15 indicating impaired cognition. The assessment identified Resident #64 to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure vials of insulin were discarded when they became out of date. This had the potential to affect six out of six residents (#14, #23, #25, #46, #69, and #178) who resided on unit one who received insulin. The facility identified there were 14 residents who received insulin. The census was 79. Findings included: Observation of medication storage for insulin for the unit one cart on 01/21/20 at 4:17 P.M. revealed there was a vial of opened Lantus with a date of opening of 12/17/19 and two vials of opened Humalog with the date of opening of 12/23/19 and 12/14/19. The vials of insulin did not have resident identification. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #70 on 01/21/20 revealed she thought the date of expiration on the vials of the above mentioned insulin was 30 days and said she would have to look at the policy to be sure. RN #70 confirmed the opened insulin vials did not contain resident identification; however, there were six (#14, #23, #25, #46, #69 and #178) residents that could use the insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility menus and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow prepared menus for the residents. This had the potential to affect 78 out of 79 residents residing in the facility, one (#54) resident was identified as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). Facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Interview on 01/21/20 at 10:20 A.M., revealed Resident #62 reported the facility changes their weekly scheduled meal menus and residents are not aware of any changes from day to day. Observation on 01/21/20 at 12:01 P.M., revealed lunch menu documented the facility was serving pork chops, sweet potato souffle, zucchini, dinner roll and fruit cup. Observations revealed the residents received green beans instead of zucchini and apple sauce instead of fruit cup. Interviews on 01/21/20 at 12:01 P.M., with six (#6, #27, #35, #38, #39, and #62) residents revealed they were not aware of the substitutions made to weekly menu. The resident's reported the weekly menus change daily. 2. Observation on 01/21/20 at 4:31 P.M., revealed dinner menu documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to label, date, and discard expired food items form the walk-refrigerator and freezer and the facility also failed to serve food in a sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect 78 out of 79 residents residing in the facility, one (#54) resident was identified as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). Facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. On 01/21/20 from 8:26 A.M. to 8:50 A.M., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Dietary Manager (DM) #56. During the observation the following concerns were observed, and all the concerns were verified during an interview with DM #56: a) In the freezer there was a plastic bag of diced chicken with no date or use by date. b) In the freezer there was a plastic bag of Salisbury steak with no date or use by date. c) In the freezer there was a plastic of chicken tenders with no date or use by date. d) In the freezer there was a plastic bag of sausage opened and not covered with no date or use by date. e) In the refrigerator there was a bag of shredded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure staff provided a dignified dining experience regarding providing timely assisting a cognitive impaired resident during a meal. This affected one (#73) of three residents observed for dignity. The facility census was 79. Finding include: Review of medical record revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility 05/04/19. Diagnoses included dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, essential hypertension, major depressive disorder, glaucoma, cardiomegaly, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/03/20, revealed Resident #73 had severely impaired cognitive deficits and required extensive assistance activity of daily living. Observation on 01/21/20 at 12:30 P.M., revealed Resident #73 had his lunch in front of him but with a lid covering it. There were three State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNA's) observed assisting and cueing residents in the dining room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed assist a resident with personal hygiene including ensuring facial hair was removed during bathing. This affected one (#54) out of one residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Facility census was 79. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 12/11/19. Medical diagnoses included heart failure, renal failure, and diabetes. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility and toilet use and total dependence for transfers and bathing with a two-person assistance. Eating was limited assistance with one-person assistance. Observation was conducted on 01/21/20 at 11:15 A.M. which revealed Resident #54 had chin and lip hairs that were approximately half an inch long. Further observation on 01/22/20 at 10:36 A.M. revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an appetite stimulant was implemented as recommended and approved by the dietician. This affected one (#77) of five residents reviewed for significant weight loss. The facility identified there were 11 residents who had significant weight loss. Facility census was 79. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 03/06/17. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's and dementia. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Her functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. She was limited assistance for eating with one-person assistance. Review of physician orders dated 12/03/20 and signed off on by the physician on 12/10/20 revealed no order for Mirtazapine. Further review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the same time frame revealed no order for Mirtazapine. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a gait belt was utilized for transporting Resident #128 in accordance with the facility policy. This affected one (#128) of one resident's reviewed for accidents during the annual survey. Facility census was 79. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #128 revealed an admission date of 01/17/20. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and dementia. Review of care plan dated 01/18/20 for Resident #128 revealed he was at risk for falls related to confusion, gait/balance problems, psychoactive drug use and unaware of safety needs. Observation on 01/21/20 at 10:44 A.M. revealed Resident #128 was being ambulated to his room by State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #40. During the observation STNA #40 was holding Resident #128 under his left arm with her left hand and had her right hand on the back of his jeans waist band while he was leaning onto her and dragging his feet to keep from falling.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow infection control practices during a wound dressing change. This affected one (#55) of two reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/08/19. Diagnoses included hypertension, major depressive disorder, macular degeneration, type II diabetes mellitus, and renal insufficiency. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 had one pressure ulcer that was unstageable due to slough. Wound care for Resident #55 was observed on 01/22/20 at 1:28 P.M. The observations revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #70 washed hands at a nursing station sink. LPN #70 obtained supplies and entered Resident #55's room. LPN #70 donned gloves and then removed dressing that was on Resident #55's right heel. LPN #70 then cleansed right heel wound with dermal wound cleanser, applied ordered treatment, and wrapped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-05-01 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received mail on the weekends. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Interview on 04/29/25 at 11:24 A.M., during resident group meeting, with Resident #1, #6, and #8, verified the mail was not delivered on Saturday, only Monday through Friday. Interview on 04/30/25 at 1:00 P.M., with Business Office Manager (BOM) #228 reported she would sort the mail Monday through Friday, and then activities would pass mail to the residents. BOM #228 verified the mail was not given to residents on Saturday, only Monday through Friday. Review of the policy titled, Resident Rights Policy and Procedure, dated 2025, revealed each resident had the right to send and receive mail, and to receive letters, packages, and other materials delivered to the facility for the resident through a means other than a postal service and should comply with the state and federal law.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-13 for 20 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.6+1.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SPRINGFIELD NURSING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/01/2022
LT INVESTOR LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2022
YAMO EQUITIES LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2022
GOLDSTEIN, JEFFERYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2022
OELBAUM, YITZCHOKIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2022
SHERMAN, LEAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2022
TRATNER, LEAHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-32.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$744K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 20%Medicare 1%Other / private 80%

This home reported $744K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$336per resident / day
operating cost
$10,214per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$254per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366236. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next