Parkview Care Center
1406 Oak Harbor Rd, Fremont, OH 43420 · For profit - Corporation · 38 certified beds · (419) 332-2589 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0606) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $159,322 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-13)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (75%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.1% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 21.4% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.0% | 6.1% | 16.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.4% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.2% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 38 beds and averages 32.8 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 75% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interviews, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) staff interview, Coroner investigator interview, review of an EMS run report, review of hospital and emergency room (ER) documentation, review of an electronic mail (e-mail) document, review of a Coroner's report and Coroner's Report of Death document, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure a resident (#50), with known swallowing issues, was provided with appropriate and timely treatment and services when the resident was assessed with changes in condition. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm, negative health outcomes, and/or death when Resident #50 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] with altered mental status, dehydration, and hyperglycemia, and returned to the facility where a follow up speech therapy evaluation was completed and determined the resident was at risk for aspiration and her diet was downgraded. Resident #50 subsequently refused multiple meals and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of medical records, review of self-reported incidents (SRI), review of witness statements, interviews with staff, residents, and family, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one cognitively impaired resident (#03) was free from resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious physical, mental and/or psychosocial negative outcomes for two residents (#03 and #21) when the facility failed to recognize and respond to Resident #02's increased sexual behavior. State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #112 reported on 04/20/24, Resident #02 had pulled his genitalia out in front of Resident #03. STNA #112 reported the incident to a nurse. On 04/26/24, Resident #02 was found with Resident #21 with his pants unfastened and was putting away his genitalia. On 04/26/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #230 was approached by staff stating Resident #02 had exposed himself to Resident #03 in the dining room. Resident #02's care plan was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, facility policy review, and manufacturer user manual, the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were implemented to promote healing and prevent the development of pressure ulcers. Actual Harm occurred when Resident #02 was placed on a faulty alternating air mattress without standard wound or equipment assessment which resulted in the deterioration of an existing stage IV pressure ulcer (full-thickness loss with exposed bone/muscle/tendon) and the development of three in-house acquired unstageable (obscured by sloth/eschar) deep tissue injuries (purple/maroon discoloration, intact or blistered skin) to the back and buttock. This affected one (#02) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 31.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #02 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, sepsis, hypertension, non-pressure chronic ulcer of the buttock,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans included a discharge plan of care. This affected four (#13, #31, #32, and #33) of five residents reviewed for discharge care plans. The facility census was 29.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 01/18/26 and readmission dates of 02/06/26, 02/24/26, 03/26/26, 04/05/26, and 04/13/26. Diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, and type two diabetes mellitus.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition.Review of Resident #13's plan of care initiated 01/19/26 and last revised 04/17/26 revealed no care plan had been initiated for discharge planning. Interview on 04/20/26 at 3:38 P.M., MDS Registered Nurse (MDSRN) #310 verified a discharge care plan had not been initiated and should have been included in the plan of care for Resident #13. 2. Review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-13 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespreadNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee personnel file review, review of the facility criminal background log, review of the facility daily timecard activity, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff with disqualifying legal convictions were not employed by the facility. This affected all 31 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:Review of the personnel file revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 was hired on 10/28/25.Review of the facility criminal background log noted LPN #200's criminal background investigation was submitted on 10/27/25 and returned on 11/20/25.According to facility daily timecard activity noted LPN #200 worked a scheduled shift on 01/06/26 between 6:53 A.M. and 7:36 P.M.Interview on 01/08/26 at 7:50 A.M., the Administrator revealed LPN #200 was charged and found guilty of domestic violence. Upon hire LPN #200 had not disclosed the guilty conviction. When LPN #200's criminal background check was returned the acting human resources staff had not discovered the conviction and recorded the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of the control substance inventory sheet, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances and narcotic medications were correctly handled, and inventoried. This affected eight (#07, #15, #06, #16, #23, #22, #09 and #21) of eight residents identified by the facility who received narcotic medications. In addition, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were reconciled at the point of administration. This affected one (#07) of eight residents who received narcotic medication. The facility census was 31. Findings include:Observation on 01/08/26 at 3:14 A.M. noted pharmaceuticals delivered to the facility by pharmacy delivery staff. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 was handed a package containing medications from the pharmacy delivery staff. No attempt to count the medications or review the contents of the package and pharmacy delivery staff immediately exited the facility.At 3:17 A.M., LPN #201 was observed placing medication cards which included controlled substances/narcotic medications in the two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions to manage lower extremity edema were implemented in accordance with physician orders. This affected two (#05 and #06) of six residents reviewed for physician prescribed treatment applications. The facility census was 31.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #05 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included lymphedema, major depression, cellulitis, chronic venous hypertension with lower extremity ulcer, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, morbid obesity, epilepsy, cellulitis on right toe, and history of transient ischemic attack. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #05 had moderately impaired cognition, delusions, no behaviors, required setup or clean-up assistance with activities of daily living, at risk for pressure ulcer development, received an antidepressant, a diuretic, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified of changes in condition. This affected one (#31) of three residents reviewed for changes in condition. The facility census was 30. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission dated of 11/11/25 and a discharge date d of 12/04/25. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, non-pressure chronic ulcer of buttock, adjustment disorder, vitamin D deficiency, muscle weakness, dysphagia, hypertension, pneumonia, Parkinson's disease, mass of right lung, and severe protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident required set-up assistance for meals. The resident had no admission weight documented on the admission MDS assessment. Review of hospital documentation dated 10/30/25 through 11/10/25 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident weights were obtained per physician orders and failed to ensure monitoring of nutritional interventions. This affected one (#31) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 30. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission dated of 11/11/25 and a discharge date d of 12/04/25. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, non-pressure chronic ulcer of buttock, adjustment disorder, vitamin D deficiency, muscle weakness, dysphagia, hypertension, pneumonia, Parkinson's disease, mass on right lung, and severe protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident required set-up assistance for meals. The resident had no admission weight documented on the admission MDS assessment. Review of hospital documentation dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and review of a job description, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a safe and sanitary condition. This affected three (#31, #3 and #30) of six resident rooms observed during the survey. The facility census was 30. Findings include: Observation on 12/22/25 at 10:25 A.M. in Resident #30's room revealed the two floor ventilation air vents had rust spots with the many areas of missing paint finish. Observation on 12/22/25 at 11:00 A.M. in Resident #3's room revealed the floor ventilation air vent was bent in the middle with rust spots. Observation on 12/22/25 at 3:00 P.M. in the room of former Resident #31 revealed the two ventilation floor air vents had rust spots, and missing finish. Further observations revealed the ventilation vents had a large build up of dust inside the floor vent. Additional observation revealed a missing piece of trim along side the bed in the former room of Resident #31. Observation and subsequent interview on 12/22/25 from 3:31 P.M. through 3:38 P.M., the Director of Maintenance (DOM) #180…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place and care was provided for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line - used for long term intravenous [IV] access). This affected one (#5) of one resident reviewed for PICC line care. The facility identified one resident with a PICC line. The facility census was 36. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission of 07/31/25 and a readmission date of 09/28/25. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and Crohn's disease of the large intestine.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had intact cognition and required staff assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).Review of a hospital After Visit Summary (AVS) dated 10/11/25 revealed Resident #5 was seen in the emergency room for painful urination and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure qualified staff were available to administer medication through a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line. This affected one (#5) of one resident reviewed for intravenous (IV) medication administration. The facility identified one resident who receive IV medications. The facility census was 36. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission of 07/31/25 and a readmission date of 09/28/25. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and Crohn's disease of the large intestine.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had intact cognition and required staff assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).Review of a hospital After Visit Summary (AVS) dated 10/11/25 revealed Resident #5 was seen in the emergency room for painful urination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessments, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an admission MDS skin condition assessment was accurate. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for MDS admission assessments. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 09/19/25. Diagnoses included surgical aftercare, colostomy status, pulmonary embolism, and malignant neoplasm of the colon. Review of the hospital documentation revealed upon discharge Resident #2 had a right buttock wound and a left buttock deep tissue injury. Review of the admission wound assessment dated [DATE] at 3:39 P.M., completed by the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed Resident #2 had a surgical incision to the abdomen and a stage two pressure ulcer of the left axilla. There was no documentation of wounds to the right or left buttock. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure colostomy drainage bag changes were completed per physician orders. This affected one (#2) of two residents reviewed for ostomy care. The facility identified two residents with colostomies. The facility census was 36.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 09/19/25. Diagnoses included surgical aftercare, colostomy status, pulmonary embolism, and malignant neoplasm of the colon. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the physician orders dated 09/19/25 revealed an order to change ostomy bag every three days and as needed. Review of the treatment administration record from 09/19/25 through 10/08/25 revealed no documentation Resident #2's colostomy bag changes had been completed per physician orders. Interview on 10/08/25 8:17 A.M., Resident #2 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of available facility medications, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a significant medication error. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 09/19/25. Diagnoses included surgical aftercare, colostomy status, pulmonary embolism, and malignant neoplasm of the colon. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the hospital discharge physician orders revealed the resident had orders for apixaban five milligrams (mg) twice daily by mouth, dronabinol 2.5 mg capsule twice daily for 30 days, folic acid one mg daily in morning by mouth, and oxycodone five mg every eight hours as needed for pain for up to 15 doses. Review of the physician orders dated 09/19/25 revealed orders for apixaban five…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of a the facility water management plan, staff interview, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, and policy review, the facility failed to implement a complete water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella bacteria and failed to wear gloves during administration of an injected medication. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents residing in the facility. The census was 34. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility the facility's water management plan lacked any information about how the facility would intervene when control measures were not met and possible contamination with Legionella bacteria was suspected or address ongoing monitoring of the plan's effectiveness. Interview with the Administrator on 03/13/25 at 10:07 A.M. verified the facility's water management plan did not address how the facility would intervene if control measures were not met, what interventions the facility would implement if contamination of Legionella bacteria was suspected, or how the facility would monitor the plan's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of activities calendars, and policy review, the facility failed to provide activities of resident preference on evenings and weekends to support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the resident. This affected one (#18) of one residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included nontraumatic subdural hemorrhage, anxiety disorder, and alcohol abuse. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact and was independent with mobility and activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview with Resident #18 on 03/10/25 at 9:33 A.M. revealed the facility did not provide activities in the evening hours and lacked a variety of different activities that suited Resident #18's interest. Resident #18 also stated on weekends…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview the facility failed to maintain medical equipment and supplies in a sanitary manner. This affected all 34 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 10/29/24 at 7:50 A.M. observation with Maintenance Director #1 during tour of the facility medical supply rooms located in the facility basement discovered the following: 1. Small medical storage room identified an open box containing 16 indwelling urinary catheter insertion trays soiled with a brown substance. Posted on the exterior of the catheter tray noted the instruction, Warning Avoid storage in direct sunlight/florescent lighting and keep area cool, dry, and well ventilated. Contents STERILE in unopened, undamaged package. 2. Small medical storage room noted a closed case of tracheostomy care kits containing 20 kits. The box was discovered with a yellow brown substance and moisture stain penetrating the box. 3. Located inside the large medical storage room noted heavy amount of debris on the floor including individual packages of incontinence briefs, open SARS-CoV-2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident heating and air conditioning equipment was operational inside resident rooms. This affected one (Resident #2) of four residents reviewed for environmental heating, ventilation and cooling in the facility. The total facility was census of 34. Findings include: Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, dementia, mood disturbance, anxiety disorder, and hypertension. According to the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #2 was assessed with intact cognition, required supervision and touch assistance with activities of daily living and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Review of facility census information Resident #2 was moved to the current room on 09/03/24. According to physician orders on 10/21/24 Resident #2 was placed into SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) COVID isolation. Observation on 10/29/24 at 11:40 A.M. located Resident #2 inside a single occupancy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the physical environment was maintained free of damage or hazardous conditions. This affected one (Resident #1) of four residents rooms observed for environmental conditions in the facility. The total facility census was 34. Findings include: On 10/29/24 at 9:13 A.M. observation discovered Resident #1 in bed with the bed located next to an exterior window. The window fixture was equipped with a single pane glass storm window containing two windows. One window pane was broken with three fractures in the glass extending across the entire pane. No additional windows were installed in the fixture to prevent exterior air movement from entering the room. Further tour of the room noted three electrical receptacles with electronic devices plugged to the outlets. The outlets were discovered to be extremely loose in the electrical junction boxes. One of the three outlets were discovered to be dislodged with approximately a one foot diameter section of drywall broken way from the wall. On 10/30/24 at 2:25 P.M. observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-20 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based of review of quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meeting sign in sheets, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly QAA meetings were completed as required. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 28. Findings include Review of the quarterly QAA meeting sign in sheets revealed the facility had no documentation a quarterly QAA meeting was held with all the required members for the second and third quarter of 2023. Interview on 05/08/24 at 1:10 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there were no sign in sheets for the quarterly meetings for the second quarter and third quarter of 2023. The DON revealed a former administrator was in charge of the sign in sheets. Review of the policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated 2024, revealed the QAA committee would meet at least quarterly and as needed to coordinate and evaluate activities under the QAPI program. This was an incidental finding found over the course of the complaint investigation.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-20 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of nurse practitioner progress notes and physician progress notes, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician and nurse practitioner were alternating resident visits. This affected five (#17, #19, #03, #02, #11) of six residents reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 28. Findings include 1. Review of the medical records revealed Resident #17 had an admission date of 10/27/21. Diagnoses included dementia, diabetes mellitus type two, epilepsy, hypertension, depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress notes revealed the NP had visits with the resident on 02/21/23, 03/09/23, 04/11/23, 05/02/23, 05/04/23, 06/01/23, 07/07/23, 08/10/23, 08/24/23, 09/07/23, 10/12/23, 11/16/23, 12/07/23, 01/04/23, 03/14/23, 04/04/24, and 05/01/24. The NP electronically signed each progress note.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of the medical record, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse. This affected three (Residents #21, #02, #03) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 28. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 02/06/24. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of left breast, secondary malignant neoplasm of brain, secondary neoplasm of right lung, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was not ambulating. Review of the plan of care initiated 04/04/24 for Resident #21 revealed the resident had a behavior problem fidgeting with medical equipment and sexually inappropriate comments related to cognitive decline and confusion. Interventions included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were provided per physician orders. This affected two (#25, #19) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 28. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 08/18/22. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, dementia, diabetes mellitus type two, protein calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required set up assistance for meals, and had significant weight loss of five percent in one month or ten percent in six months. Review of the physician orders for Resident #25 revealed orders dated 08/23/22 for a regular diet, with regular texture and thin liquids. On 01/16/24, the resident was ordered a house shake twice daily related to protein-calorie malnutrition. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure a physician was notified when the facility was unable to administer a resident's enteral nutrition as ordered. This affected one (#38) of two residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 28. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 had an admission date of 02/12/24 and a discharge date of 02/20/24. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, dysphagia, gastrostomy status, and liver transplant status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) five-day assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 had intact cognition. The resident required set-up assistance for meals and had a feeding tube. Review of hospital discharge orders dated 02/12/24 revealed Resident #38 had orders for Jevity 1.5 (nutritional formula) at 20 milliliters (ml) per hour by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received enteral feedings per physician orders. This affected one (#38) of two residents reviewed for tube feedings. The facility census was 28. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 had an admission date of 02/12/24 and a discharge date of 02/20/24. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, dysphagia, gastrostomy status, and liver transplant status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) five-day assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 had intact cognition. The resident required set-up assistance for meals and had a feeding tube. Review of hospital discharge orders dated 02/12/24 revealed Resident #38 had orders for Jevity 1.5 (nutritional formula) at 20 milliliters (ml) per hour by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. Review of a physician order dated 02/12/24 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), agency staff interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's narcotic medication was not misappropriated. This affected one (#25) of one resident reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census is 28. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was initially admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic combined systolic (congestive) heart failure, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, epilepsy, essential (primary) hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation, depression, bipolar disorder, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/19/24, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and received antianxiety, antidepressant, and opioid medications. Review of physician orders, dated 07/26/23, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the ability to affect all 30 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 30. Findings included: Observation of the kitchen on 12/15/23 at 11:11 A.M. revealed Kitchen Aide #510 was observed preparing meal trays for the resident room service. Kitchen Aide #510 was observed to not be wearing a hairnet. Interview with [NAME] #500 on 12/15/23 at 11:13 A.M. verified Kitchen Aide #510 failed to wear the proper attire to prevent possible hair contamination in the food. Review of the facility policy titled Staff Attire revised on 09/2017 revealed all staff members will have their hair off the shoulders, confined in a hair net or cap and facial hair properly restrained.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide timely dental services for a resident. This affected one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 33. Findings include: Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed Resident #12 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, anxiety, major depressive disorder, heartburn, restlessness and agitation, other psychoactive substance abuse, and homelessness. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/22/23, revealed Resident #12 was cognitively impaired with moderately severe depression. There were no behaviors or rejection of care. Resident #12 required supervision for a majority of the activities of daily living. Review of Resident #12's physician orders for October 2023 revealed an order dated 08/17/23 for dental as needed. Review of the nursing progress notes dated 08/19/23, revealed Resident #12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable, homelike environment by not ensuring the floors were maintained; showers were free from disrepair and discolored grout. This affected all 31 residents in the facility. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Interview and observations on 10/03/23 beginning at 9:50 A.M., with Maintenance Director #500 revealed the flooring in the facility was planks of flooring approximately three feet long fitting together throughout the common areas. Continued observation revealed the planks in high-traveled common areas, except the dining room, were taped with duct tape and black tape, curved, buckling, warped, and poorly fitted. In some areas the planks were raised along the long edge as if they were put in too tight and were squeezed together and raised off the subfloor, and in other places gaps were noted between the short ends. Maintenance Director #500 confirmed all observations of poorly fitting and taped together flooring in the high-traveled areas, except the dining room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medical records contained accurate and identifiable entries by specified nursing staff. This affected four (#23, #6, #10 and #5) of four medical records reviewed for accuracy and had the potential to affect all 27 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 27. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/25/22, with the diagnoses including: major depression, dementia with behavioral and psychotic disturbance, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary tract infection, urinary retention, supra pubic urinary catheter, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #23 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure multiple use medication vials were stored and maintained to promote effectiveness. This affected one (#9) resident receiving insulin and a undetermined number of residents regarding tuberculosis testing in a facility census of 27. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/18/22 at 7:42 A.M., of the Front medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #206 discovered an open multiple use vial of Lantus insulin. The vial was opened and did not contain a date opened. Interview with LPN #206, at the time of the observation, confirmed all multiple use medication vials are to be marked with an open date when first opened. Review of the policy tiled Insulin Administration Procedure, revised September 2014, instructs staff to check an expiration date, if drawing from a opened multi-dose vial. If opening a new vial, record expiration date and time on the vial. 2. Observation on 10/18/22 at 7:45 A.M., with LPN #206, of the facility medication storage room discovered two multiple use vials of tuberculin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to distribute meals to residents in a safe and sanitary manner. This affected 15 (#4, #5, #9, #10, #11, #13, #14, #16, #19, #20, #22, #24, #25, #26, and #78) of 15 residents who received meal trays in their rooms. The facility census was 27. Findings include: Observations beginning on 10/17/22 at 11:44 A.M., revealed tray carts containing food trays for the lunch meal were not enclosed and contained saucers with frosted chocolate cake on them. The chocolate cake was not covered and was open-to-air. Meal trays containing uncovered chocolate cake were delivered to the rooms of Resident #4, #5, #9, #10, #11, #13, #14, #16, #19, #20, #22, #24, #25, #26, and #78. Interview with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #204, at the time of observation, verified the chocolate cake was uncovered and open-to-air as it was transported throughout the facility. Interview on 10/18/22 at 11:40 A.M., with Dietary Manager #300 revealed food items contained on tray carts were required to be covered and verified the chocolate cake…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's documents, the facility failed to allow residents to smoke. This affected one (#4) of three residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 27. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, depression, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/28/22, revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact and was independent for the activities of daily living. Review of the smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 required supervision for smoking. Review of the nursing progress notes dated 09/26/22 at 1:12 P.M. revealed Resident #4 was a supervised smoker and lit up a cigarette and began to smoke stating she hated the rules about smoking. Resident #4 was reminded of the smoking contract she signed and continued to smoke her cigarette. Resident #4 was suspended from smoking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care and bathing was provided timely to a resident who required assistance from staff with activities of daily living. This affected one (Resident #11) of 16 residents observed for activities of daily living. The facility identified 19 residents who required assistance from staff with bathing and 20 residents who required assistance from staff with dressing. The facility census was 27. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, psoriasis, polyneuropathy, candidiasis of skin and nail, peripheral vascular disease, and abnormal posture. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #11 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #11 was dependent on staff for physical assistance of one person for the completion of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of the facility's skin assessment policy, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's skin was monitored routinely and the resident's skin impairments were reported to the nurse and physician timely. This affected one (Resident #11) of one residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin issues. The facility identified one resident with a rash related skin issue. The facility census was 27. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, psoriasis, polyneuropathy, candidiasis of skin and nail, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #11 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #11 was dependent on staff for physical assistance of one person for the completion of activities of daily living (ADL) including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure treatments were completed per physician order. This affected one (#5) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified three current residents with pressure ulcers residing in the facility. The facility census was 27. Findings Include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder, hallucinations, irritability and anger, muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of left heel, pressure-induced deep tissue damage of right and left heels, non-pressure chronic ulcer of lower left and right legs, edema, chronic pain, and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/05/22, revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact and was independent for activities of daily living. Resident #5 had two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required supervision were monitored during smoking. This affected one (Resident #10) of seven residents identified by the facility who required supervision while smoking. The facility census was 27. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, glaucoma, anxiety disorder, dry eye syndrome, cataract let eye, psychosis, major depression, dementia, suicidal ideations, and pigmentary retinal dystrophy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #10 was cognitively intact, had severely impaired vision, depressed mood, dependent on staff for the provision of hygiene and dressing, independent with bed mobility, and propels self in wheelchair. Review of the nursing plan of care, last revised on 08/03/22, revealed Resident #10 was a smoker and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #23 received appropriate treatment regarding the maintenance of a suprapubic indwelling urinary catheter and failed to ensure Resident #78 was provided with specific interventions to maintain urinary and bowel continence. This affected two of two residents (#23 and #78) reviewed for catheter care and incontinence care. The facility identified two residents with an indwelling or external catheter. The facility identified two residents on a urinary toileting program and three residents on bowel toileting program. The facility census was 27. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depression, dementia with behavioral and psychotic disturbance, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary tract infection,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical recommendations were reviewed by the physician. This affected three (#5, #6, and #10) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 27. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder, hallucinations, irritability and anger, muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of left heel, pressure-induced deep tissue damage of right and left heels, non-pressure chronic ulcer of lower left and right legs, edema, chronic pain, and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/05/22, revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact and was independent for activities of daily living. Review of Resident #5's prescribed medications list for May 2022 through October 2022 identified a current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family and staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were identified and subsequently honored. This affected one (#22) of two residents reviewed for food preferences. The facility census was 27. Findings include: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia, bipolar disorder, type II diabetes mellitus, vitamin D deficiency, and anemia. Review of Resident #22's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was identified as having severe cognitive impairment and was independent for bed mobility and eating. Review of Resident #22's electronic and paper medical records revealed no information pertaining to Resident #22's dietary preferences. Interview on 10/17/22 at 10:25 A.M., with Resident #22's family member stated Resident #22 had not been eating much because she did not like to eat American food.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of a manufacture's instructions, review of the infection control surveillance log, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure glucometers were properly sanitized/disinfect prior to use on resident's. This had the potential to affect five residents (#1, #5, #8, #9, #25) who had orders for blood sugar monitoring on the C and D halls. Additionally, the facility failed to establish and implement an infection control program to ensure ongoing surveillance of infections to to prevent the spread of infections and ensure appropriate treatment of infections. This had the potential to affect all 29 residents. The facility census was 29. Findings include: 1. Observation on 11/12/19 at 4:28 P.M. Registered Nurse (RN) #305 obtained a glucometer and supplies from a medication cart and proceeded to Resident #25's room. RN #305 pricked the resident's index finger with a lancet device, expelled a drop of the resident's blood, and used the glucometer to obtain the drop of blood to obtain a blood sugar reading. RN #305 then returned to the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-11-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the infection control surveillance log, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program to prevent the spread and ensure appropriate treatment of infections. This had the potential to affect all 29 residents. The facility census was 29. Findings include: Review of the infection control surveillance log at the time of the annual survey revealed documentation from January 2019 to November 2019 which lacked supporting information for appropriate antibiotic stewardship. The infection control surveillance log provided no evidence the facility had monitored the tracking and trending of infectious facility diseases. The infection control surveillance log did not contain any documentation of infectious organisms that would have been identified in the laboratory culture and sensitivity testing. The infection control surveillance log provided no documentation of the dates of onset of infections, and no monitoring of weather or not the antibiotic was started or completed. The infection control surveillance log provided no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility activities calendars and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide scheduled group activities for the residents. This affected one (#16) out of two residents reviewed for activities and had the potential to affect 14 additional residents (#12, #127, #8, #17, #130, #2, #3, #4, #1, #25, #15, #14, #13, #9) identified by the facility who typically attended group activities. The facility census was 29. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #16 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included legal blindness, diabetes and heart failure. Review of Resident #16's most recent plan of care revealed the resident was depended on staff for activities due to his blindness, anxiety and depression. Interventions included to provide one to one activities and to invite the resident to scheduled activities. Interview on 11/12/19 at 9:43 A.M., Resident #16 stated he did not feel the facility provided enough group activities for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a record review and family and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide resident's responsible party statements of residents trust accounts. This affected one (#8) of 18 residents reviewed during the initial pool process of the annual survey. The facility census was 29. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #8 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's most recent Minimum Data Sets assessment, dated 09/19/19, revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Review of Resident #8's trust fund quarterly statements revealed a signature by Resident #8 verifying receipt. No other signature was observed. Phone interview on 11/12/19 at 11:19 A.M., with Resident #8's Power of Attorney (POA), revealed he was the responsible for the resident's medical and financial needs. The POA confirmed the resident had a resident trust account the facility managed but stated he did not know how much was in the account. The POA revealed he did not receive statements for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medication when staff failed to monitor a resident's blood pressure and/or pulse rate prior to administering medications with physician ordered parameters. This affected one (#2) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The facility census was 29. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic atrial fibrillation, hypertension and heart failure. Review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed the resident was ordered Coreg (mediation to treat high blood pressure and heart failure) 12.5 milligrams (mg) twice a day. Further review of the order revealed staff were supposed to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure less than 110 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) and/or a heart rate less than 50 beats per minute (bmp). Review of the resident's 10/2019 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing was completed per physician orders. This affected one (#24) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The facility census was 29. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 10/13/19. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension and a history of a pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. Review of a physician order dated 10/13/19 revealed Resident #24 was ordered Coumadin (anticoagulant (blood thinning medication) to treat and/or prevent blood clots and pulmonary embolisms) nine milligrams (mg) daily. Further review of the order revealed Resident #24 was ordered laboratory testing to monitor prothrombin time (PT) (a test used to help detect and diagnose a bleeding disorder or excessive clotting disorder) and the international normalized ratio (INR) (a value calculated from a PT result and is used to monitor how well blood-thinning medication is working to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the influenza (flu) shot log, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to administer the appropriate influenza vaccination to Resident #122 and flailed to offer the appropriate pneumococcal vaccinations to Resident #8. This affected two (#8 and #122) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 29. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed the Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus and muscle weakness. Review of the Resident #8's immunization record revealed the influenza vaccination was administered on 10/23/19 and documented on a two-sided informed consent for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations. Further review of the Resident #8's immunization record revealed no documentation the pneumococcal vaccination was offered to the Resident #8 since September of 2018. Interview on 11/14/19 at 9:09 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-10-20 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily posted nursing staff information was updated timely as required. This had the potential to affect all 27 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 10/17/22 at 7:05 A.M., of the daily posted nursing staff information, revealed the posted information including the facility name, the census, and the total number and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff for resident care each shift was dated 07/28/22. Interview and observation 10/17/22 at 7:10 A.M., with Business Office Manager #855 verified daily posted nursing staff information was not up-to-date and should have been.
- No harm found · C2022-10-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the assessment used to determine what resources were necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies was updated accurately. This had the potential to affect all 27 of 27 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility assessment tool, revised October 2022, revealed the assessment included within the tool was inaccurate due to the following: a. The assessment had the incorrect name listed for the Administrator, the Director of Nursing (DON), the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the MDS Coordinator, and the Admissions Director. b. The assessment did not address the facility's use of contract (agency) nursing staff to provide services. Interview on 10/20/22 at 8:28 A.M. with the DON verified the facility assessment was not accurate.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$159,322 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $20,925 — penalty dated 2026-01-13
- $46,760 — penalty dated 2025-07-22
- $91,637 — penalty dated 2024-05-20
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERENITY EQUITY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 16% | since 09/18/2017 |
| ZW AOM RE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 16% | since 09/18/2017 |
| GOLDSTEIN, JEFFERY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 21% | since 01/15/2024 |
| SHERMAN, ALEXANDER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 17% | since 01/15/2024 |
| HOROWITZ, ZALEMAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 09/18/2017 |
| WAGSCHAL, ZALMAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 16% | since 09/18/2017 |
| WEINBERGER, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 09/18/2017 |
| WEISS, KRISTI | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/18/2017 |
| SHERMAN, SAMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/18/2017 |
| AOM HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/18/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $197K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366081. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.